REPORT NO. 199
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA
DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS
ONE HUNDRED NINETY NINTH REPORT Action Taken by Government on the Recommendations/ Observationscontained in the One Hundred Ninety-seventhReport on Demands for Grants (2016-17) of the Ministry of Home Affairs (Presented to the Rajya Sabha on8 th February, 2017 ) (Laid on the Table of Lok Sabha on8 th February, 2017 )
Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi February, 2017/Magha, 1938 (Saka) Website : http://rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail : [email protected] Hindi version of this publication is also available
C.S. (H.A.)-390
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA
DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS
ONE HUNDRED NINETY NINTH REPORT
Action Taken by Government on the Recommendations/ Observations contained in the One Hundred Ninety-seventh Report on Demands for Grants (2016-17) of the Ministry of Home Affairs
(Presented to the Rajya Sabha on 8th February, 2017) (Laid on the Table of Lok Sabha on 8th February, 2017)
Rajya Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi February, 2017/Magha, 1938 (Saka) CONTENTS
PAGES
1. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ...... (i)-(ii)
2. INTRODUCTION ...... (iii)
3. ACRONYMS ...... (iv)-(viii)
4. REPORT ...... 1-54
Chapter I Recommendations/Observations which have been accepted by the Government ...... 3-11
Chapter II Recommendations/Observations on which the Committee does not desire to pursue the matter in view of the Government’s reply ...... 12-22
Chapter III Recommendations/Observations in respect of which replies of the Government have not been accepted by the Committee ...... 23-46
Chapter IV Recommendations/Observations in respect of which final reply of the Government have not been received ...... 47-54
5. RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS — AT A GLANCE ...... 55-61
6. MINUTES ...... 63-67 COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (Re-constituted w.e.f. 1st September, 2016)
1. Shri P. Chidambaram — Chairman
RAJYA SABHA
2. Shri K. Rahman Khan 3. Dr. V. Maitreyan 4. Shri Shamsher Singh Manhas 5. Shri Majeed Memon 6. Shri Bhaskar Rao Nekkanti 7. Shri Derek O’Brien 8. Shri Neeraj Shekhar 9. Shri R.K. Sinha 10. Shri Sitaram Yechury
LOK SABHA
11. Shri Prem Singh Chandumajra 12. Shri S. Selvakumara Chinayan 13. Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury 14. Dr. (Smt.) Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar 15. Shri Ramen Deka 16. Shri Prataprao Jadhav 17. Shri Mallikarjun Kharge 18. Shrimati Kirron Kher 19. Shri Kaushal Kishore 20. Shri Ashwini Kumar 21. Shri P. Nagarajan 22. Shri Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu 23. Shri Baijayant “Jay” Panda 24. Shri Dilip Patel 25. Shri Lalubhai Babubhai Patel 26. Shri Natubhai Gomanbhai Patel 27. Shri Bheemarao B. Patil 28. Shri Mohammed Faizal PP 29. Shri Bishnupada Ray
(i) (ii)
30. Dr. Satya Pal Singh 31. Shri B. Sreeramulu
SECRETARIAT Shri P.P.K. Ramacharyulu, Additional Secretary Shri Vimal Kumar, Director Dr. (Smt.) Subhashree Panigrahi, Joint Director Shri Bhupendra Bhaskar, Deputy Director Shri Pritam Kumar, Assistant Director INTRODUCTION
I, the Chairman of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs, having been authorized by the Committee to submit the Report on its behalf, do hereby present this One Hundred Ninety Ninth Report on Action Taken by Government on the observations/recommendations contained in the One Hundred Ninety Seventh Report on Demands for Grants (2016-17) of the Ministry of Home Affairs.
2. The One Hundred and Ninety-seventh Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs was presented to the Rajya Sabha and laid on the Table of the Lok Sabha on 3rd May, 2016. After presentation of the Report, the copies thereof were sent to the Ministry of Home Affairs requesting them to furnish Action Taken Notes on the recommendations of the Committee contained in the
Report. The Ministry furnished the Action Taken Notes on the said report to the Committee on 14th September, 2016.
3. The Minister of Home Affairs laid the statement on the status of implementation of the recommendations contained in the said Report of the Committee on the Table of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on 14th December, 2016, pursuant to the direction of Chairman, Rajya Sabha dated 24th September 2004.
4. The Committee considered the draft One Hundred and Ninety Ninth Report and adopted the same at its meeting held on 31st January 2017.
5. The recommendations/observations of the Committee are printed in bold letters.
P. BHATTACHARYA NEW DELHI; Chairman 31st January, 2017 Department-related Parliamentary Magha 11, 1938 (Saka) Standing Committee on Home Affairs Rajya Sabha
(iii) ACRONYMS
AAI – Airports Authority of India
AAC – Administrator’s Advisory Council
ACA – Additional Central Assistance
ACP – Assistant Commissioner of Police
APWD – Andaman Public Work Department
AR – Assam Riffles
ASI – Assistant Sub-Inspector
ATI – Andaman Timber Industries
BADP – Border Area Development Programme
BE – Budget Estimates
BM – Border Management
BSF – Border Security Force
CAPFs – Central Armed Police Forces
CCEA – Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs
CCS – Cabinet Committee on Security
CCTNS – Crime and Criminal Tracking Network System
CCTV – Close Circuit Television
CFSL – Central Forensic Science Laboratory
CGHS – Central Government Health Scheme
CIAT – Counter Insurgency and Anti-Terrorist
CISF – Central Industrial Security Force
CNE – Committee on Non-Plan Expenditure
CoBRA – Commando Battalions for Resolute Action
CP – Commissioner of Police
CPMFs – Central Para Military Forces
CPOs – Central Police Organisations
(iv) (v)
CPWD – Central Public Works Department
CRPF – Central Reserve Police Force
CTD – Counter-Terrorism Department
CSS – Centrally Sponsored Schemes
C-Visa – Centralized Visa Issuance System
DA – Dearness Allowance
DCP – Deputy Commissioner of Police
DGMO – Director General of Military Operation
DPC – District Planning Committee
DPR – Detailed Project Report
EFA – Encroached Forest Area
EFC – Expenditure Finance Committee
EoI – Expression of Interest
FIR – First Information Report
GoI – Government of India
GNCTD – Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
HC – Head Constable
HHTI – Hand Held Thermal Imager
HM – Home Minister
HMAC – Home Minister’s Advisory Committees
IAP – Integrated Action Plan
ICPs – Integrated Check Posts
IMB – Indo-Myanmar Border
ITBP – Indo-Tibetan Border Police
JIT – Joint Investigation Team
KLNLF – Karbi Longri NC Hills Liberation Front
KNO – Kuki National Organisation
LORROS – Long Range Reconnaissance & Observation System
LPAI – Land Port Authority of India
LSI – Large Scale Industry (vi)
LTV – Long Term Visa
LWE – Left Wing Extremist/Extremism
MCP – Mega City Policing
MHA – Ministry of Home Affairs
MSI – Medium Industry
MoD – Ministry of Defence
MoRD – Ministry of Rural Development
MoRTH – Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
MoU – Memorandum of Understanding
MPCS – Multi-Purpose Cyclone Shelters
MPF – Modernisation of Police Forces
NATGRID – National Intelligence Grid
NBCC – National Building Corporation Company
NCRMP – National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project
NCT – National Capital Territory
NDFB/P – National Democratic Front of Bodoland/Progressive
NDFB/RD – National Democratic Front of Bodoland/Ranjan Daimary
NDMA – National Disaster Management Authority
NDRF – National Disaster Response Force
NEPA – North Eastern Police Academy
NFSC – National Fire Service College
NIA – National Investigation Agency
NIP – New Implementation Plan
NITI AAYOG – National Institution for Transforming India Aayog
NPA – National Police Academy
NPR – National Population Register
NSCN/R – National Socialist Council of Nagaland/Reformation
NSG – National Security Guards
OBC – Other Backward Class
OCI – Overseas Citizens of India (vii)
OIDC – Omnibus Industrial Development Corporation
OL – Official Language
ORGI – Office of Registrar General of India
OSINT – Open Source Intelligence
PH – Physically Handicapped Personnel
PHQ – Police Headquarters
PMGSY – Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana
PMKVY – Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana
PMRP – Prime Minister Reconstruction Programme
PMO – Prime Minister’s Office
PMU – Project Management Unit
POC – Project Oversight Committee
PPP – Public-Private-Partnership
PSC – Project Steering Committee
PWD – Public Works Department
RE – Revised Estimates
RIB – Rigid Inflatable Boats
RGI – Registrar General of India
SDMC – South Delhi Municipal Corporation
SHO – Station House Officer
SI – Sub-Inspector
SIMI – Students Islamic Movement of India
SIS – Special Infrastructure Scheme
SLEIAA – State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority
SoO – Suspension of Operation
SP – Superintendent of Police
SPG – Special Protection Group
SPSC – State Project Steering Committees
SRE – Security Related Expenditures
SSB – Sashastra Seema Bal (viii)
SSC – Staff Selection Commission
SVPNPA – Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Police Academy
UC – Utilisation Certificates
UPF – United Progressive Front
UTs – Union Territories 1
REPORT
The Report of the Committee deals with the Action Taken by the Government on the recommendations contained in its One Hundred Ninety Seventh Report on Demands for Grants of the Ministry of Home Affairs for the years (2016-17). The said Report was presented to the Rajya Sabha and laid on the Table of the Lok Sabha on 3rd May, 2016.
2. Action Taken Notes were received from the Ministry of Home Affairs in respect of the recommendations contained in the 197th Report on 14th September, 2016. The Minister of Home Affairs laid the statement on the status of implementation of the recommendations contained in the said Report of the Committee on the Table of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on 14th December, 2016 The Action Taken Notes received from the Ministry of Home Affairs have been categorised as follows: Chapter-I: The recommendations/Observations, which have been accepted by the Government: Para Nos. 2.6, 2.15, 2.24, 2.27, 3.1.10, 3.3.5, 4.7.6, 4.9.9, 4.9.10, 5.18.7, 5.19.7, 5.19.8, 5.19.9, 5.48, 5.50, 5.53.12, 5.53.14, and 5.53.15 (of One Hundred and Ninety Seventh Report)
Total Recommendations-18
The Committee is pleased to note that the Ministry has accepted its recommendations as mentioned in Chapter-I of the Report.
Chapter-II: The recommendations/observations which the Committee does not desire to pursue in view of the Government’s replies: Para Nos. 2.17, 2.18, 2.20, 2.23, 3.1.8, 3.4.5, 3.5.11, 3.5.12, 5.3.5, 5.5.2, 5.6.2, 5.12.2, 5.13.2, 5.14.5, 5.16.3, 5.18.8, 5.18.9, 5.19.10, 5.52, 6.3.2, 6.3.3, and 6.5.4 (ibid)
Total Recommendations-22
The Committee is convinced with the explanations furnished by the Ministry and, therefore, does not wish to pursue the recommendations further.
Chapter-III: The recommendations/observations in respect of which the Committee is not satisfied with the replies of the Ministry: Para Nos. 2.16, 2.19, 2.25, 3.1.6, 3.2.4, 3.4.9, 3.4.10, 3.4.11, 3.5.10, 4.1.9, 4.1.10, 4.2.4, 4.2.5, 4.2.9, 4.3.9, 4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.11.3, 5.7.2, 5.8.3, 5.9.3, 5.11.2, 5.14.4, 5.49, 5.51, 5.53.13, 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.2.8, 6.2.9, and 6.4.2 (ibid)
Total Recommendations-31
The Committee expresses its concern over the non-implementation of its recommendations contained in Chapter-III and desires that the Ministry should furnish convincing explanations in respect of those recommendations.
Chapter-IV: Recommendations/Observations in respect of which final replies of the Government have not been received: Para Nos. 2.12, 2.13, 4.3.8, 4.5.2, 4.6.7, 4.9.8, 4.11.2, 5.1.18, 5.4.2, 5.10.2, 5.14.3, 5.16.2, 5.18.6, 5.18.10, and 5.53.11 (ibid)
1 2
Total Recommendations-15
In respect of 15 recommendations in Chapter-IV, the Ministry has either furnished interim reply or couched its response in vague terms. Therefore, the Committee desires that the Ministry should furnish pointed and detailed Action Taken Notes in respect of the recommendations categorised in Chapter-IV in keeping with the spirit of the recommendations. 3. The details of the Action Taken Notes have been analysed in the succeeding chapters. CHAPTER-I
RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT
1.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DEMANDS FOR GRANTS
Recommendation
1.1.1 The Committee notes that there is an increase of 12.15% over BE 2015-16 and 9.84% over RE 2015-16 to the Ministry of Home Affairs BE 2016-17. The Committee apprehends that this nominal increase would just meet the inflationary pressures. The Committee recommends that the Ministry after making a thorough scrutiny of its needs to run the 15 projects in hand and projects proposed, may approach the Ministry of Finance for enhancing allocation at RE stage, otherwise ongoing schemes and projects would be seriously affected. Besides, currently launched projects th would also be adversely affected. (Para 2.6 of 197 Report)
Action Taken
1.1.2 The allocated budget is less than the demand projected by the Ministry in the Budget of the current financial year. Based on the project evaluations and physical targets achieved during the year, the matter of providing additional funds will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at the time of Revised Estimate Stage.
Recommendation
1.1.3 The Committee notes the overall security situation in the country particularly in the North- Eastern States and Left Wing Extremism (LWE) affected States and the efforts to bring ultras from North East to negotiating table. The Committee is of the view that the Ministry should enhance its efforts to bring these separatist forces to the mainstream through dialogue and negotiation. (Para 2.15)
Action Taken
1.1.4 ‘Police’ and ‘Public Order’ being State subjects, maintenance of law and order is primary responsibility of the State Governments concerned. However, the Central Government supplements the efforts of the States to fight extremism.
1.1.5 The Government positively considers any offer of talks, once the extremists renounce violence and express faith in the democratic set up. The Central as well as State Governments encourage extremists to leave violence, surrender and come into the mainstream. For this purpose, the State Governments have their Surrender-cum-Rehabilitation policies, which provide financial as well as physical help for their rehabilitation and settlement.
1.1.6 As regards Left Wing Extremism, the Central Government also provides financial assistance to the LWE affected States under Security Related Expenditure (SRE) Scheme. Due to such constant efforts of the Central as well State Governments, the number of surrendered LWE cadres
3 4 have increased to 878 in 2016 (up to 31.7.2016) against 272 in the corresponding period of 2015. Hence, the LWE cadres are coming forward for surrendering before the Government to join the mainstream.
1.1.7 As regards, North Eastern States, the Central Government is pursuing a policy for talks/ negotiation with such groups which categorically abjure violence, lay down arms and seek solutions for their problems peacefully within the framework of the Constitution of India. At present, the Government is engaged in peace talks with various insurgent groups of NE Region and talks are continuing with United Liberation Front of Assam [ULFA/Pro-talk], National Democratic Front of Bodoland/Progressive [NDFB/P], NDFB/Ranjan Diamary [NDFB/RD], Karbi Longri NC Hills Liberation Front [KLNLF] of Assam.
1.1.8 National Socialist Council of Nagaland/Isak Muivah [NSCN/IM], NSCN/Kitovi-Neopaokonyak [NSCN/KN] and NSCN/Reformation [NSCN/R] of Nagaland are under ceasefire agreements. A total of 23 UG outfits of Manipur, under two conglomerates (United Progressive Front [UPF] -8, Kuki National Organisation [KNO] -15) are presently under Suspension of Operation (SoO) agreement with the Government. Three valley based UG outfits of Manipur, namely, United Revolutionary Front [URF], Kangleipak Communist Party (Lamphel) [KCP/L] and Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup/MDF [KYKL/MDF] have signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Government of India.
1.1.9 Pursuant to the policy of talks, various insurgent outfits viz. United People’s Democratic Solidarity [UPDS], Dima Halam Daogah [DHD] of Assam and Achik National Volunteer Council [ANVC] and ANVC/B of Meghalaya have signed Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) with the Government and dissolved themselves. As a result, a number of cadres of insurgent outfits have surrendered after laying down arms and joined the mainstream of society.
Recommendation
1.1.10 The Committee also notes that the Government proposes to adopt multi-pronged strategy to deal with extremists/separatists of North East Region. The Committee is of the view that the Government should start dialogue with these groups and address sympathetically their grievances within the framework of the Constitution of India with an aim to bring them into the mainstream. The multipronged strategy should include this aspect also. (Para 2.24 ibid)
Action Taken
1.1.11 The Government is following a multi-pronged strategy to deal with insurgent and militant activities in the North-East Region which, inter-alia includes willingness to talk to groups, provided they abjure violence.
1.1.12 At present, the Government is engaged in peace talks with various insurgent groups of NE Region and talks are continuing with United Liberation Front of Assam [ULFA/Pro-talk], National Democratic Front of Bodoland/Progressive [NDFB/P], NDFB/Ranjan Diamary [NDFB/RD], Karbi Longri NC Hills Liberation Front [KLNLF] of Assam.
1.1.13 National Socialist Council of Nagaland/Isak Muivah [NSCN/IM], NSCN/ Kitovi- Neopaokonyak [NSCN/KN] and NSCN/Reformation [NSCN/R] of Nagaland are under ceasefire agreements. A total of 23 UG outfits of Manipur, under two conglomerates (United Progressive Front [UPF]-8, Kuki National Organisation [KNO] -15) are presently under SoO agreement with the Government. Three valley based UG outfits of Manipur, namely, United Revolutionary Front [URF], 5
Kangleipak Communist Party (Lamphel) [KCP/L] and Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup/MDF [KYKL/MDF] have signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Government of India.
1.1.14 Pursuant to the policy of talks, various insurgent outfits viz. United People’s Democratic Solidarity [UPDS], Dima Halam Daogah [DHD] of Assam and Achik National Volunteer Council [ANVC] and ANVC/B of Meghalaya have signed Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) with the Government and dissolved themselves.
1.1.15 As a result, a number of cadres of insurgent outfits have surrendered after laying down arms and joined the mainstream of society.
Recommendation
1.1.16 The Committee is displeased to note the underutilisation of funds in respect of many of the plan schemes of the Ministry of Home Affairs consistently during the years 2012-16 (as on 29th February, 2016). The main concern of the Committee is that during the last four financial years, the Ministry has not even been able to spend the reduced allocation at RE Stage in several schemes which is an indicator of under-performance. The Committee notes that under many schemes/projects like infrastructure for CAPFs or Border Management there are still huge gaps in terms of what is desired and what is existing. Moreover, the funds available have not been optimally utilized. The Ministry needs to gear up its machinery to analyze what is the cause of this consistent underutilisation and take adequate measures to plug the gaps for achieving the desired objectives and goals. The Committee would like to be apprised about the steps to be taken for strengthening the absorption capacity of various schemes and agencies. Besides, the Committee has apprehension that this underutilisation may prove to be a valid ground for further reduction in allocation during future financial allocations. The Committee, therefore, recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should pay attention to restructure its implementation agencies so that the schemes /projects would be completed without time and cost overrun. (Para 2.27) Action Taken
1.1.17 Due to various bottlenecks in the implementation of projects/schemes, the allocated funds could not be utilized fully in past. However, the following efforts/initiatives/measures have been taken by the MHA for ensuring completion of projects in a time bound manner:–
z Decentralization of execution:
¾ Earlier works were being executed mostly through CPWD and some through NBCC.
¾ MHA has issued order on 16.07.2015 that DGs can execute works through any Central/State PSU/PWOs following General Financial Rules and CVC guidelines.
¾ Ministry of Finance on 13.04.2016 issued amendment to GFR Rules, 2005, which inter alia, prescribe that award of works to the PSUs/other Government organizations, as defined in the amended Rule 126(3), shall be based on competition among such PSUs/organizations. This competition shall be essentially on the lump sum service charges to be claimed for execution of work.
z Delegated power of DGs of forces has been increased. 6
z Regular review meetings are being held in MHA at senior level to monitor the progress of the works assigned to construction agencies.
z In pursuance to NITI Aayog’s guidelines dated 29.03.2016, this Ministry has issued directions on 13.05.2016 to CAPFs to set up a force-level Standing Committee to fix the responsibility for cost and overrun, both for the revised cost proposals to be submitted for approval of Cabinet/CCEA as well as the proposals to be decided within the delegated powers of the Ministry or within the delegated powers of the DGs.
1.1.18 It is submitted that the expenditure in the Ministry is reviewed periodically at the highest level with the heads of budget controlling authorities and suitable instructions are given to avoid underutilisation of funds. This exercise is also aimed at identifying and removing bottlenecks in the implementation process. Necessary advisory has been issued from time to time to prepare the budgetary allocations/estimates, keeping in view the ground realities and achievability of targets, with the stipulation that scarce resources should not be tied to schemes which do not take off.
1.1.19 It is mentioned that the exercise has paid off in improving the situation on all fronts. For the first time in many years, almost 50% of Budget Estimate 2015-16 had been utilized during the first six months i.e. upto September, 2015. Consequently, during the year 2015-16, the reduction in the plan outlay was very marginal and the expenditure has been recorded at approximately 96% of the total available plan outlay for the whole year.
1.2 DEMAND NO. 46 – MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
Recommendation
1.2.1 The Committee observes that against projected demand of `5003.97 crore under Demand No. 46 only `4630.90 crore (`1250.00 crore under Plan and `3380.90 crore Non-Plan) has been allocated for the year 2016-17. The Committee also observes that there is a shortfall in major Heads such as Secretariat-General Services, Official language, Disaster Management, Civil Defence and Fire and Emergency Service, Home Guards, etc. The Committee presumes that this shortfall in allocation is a clear indicator of low absorption of funds as highlighted in the trend of expenditure during last financial year and hence impresses upon the Ministry to optimize its utilisation capacity to put up a robust case for more allocations at RE stage. (Para 3.1.10)
Action Taken
1.2.2 The recommendation of the Committee has been noted and the matter of providing additional funds will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at the time of Supplementary Demands for Grants and Revised Estimate Stages. 1.3 FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES
Recommendation
1.3.1 The Committee takes note of the submission of the Ministry that Fire Services in most of the States fall within the jurisdiction of local bodies which are often starved of financial resources and hence are ill-equipped. The Committee also takes note of the submission of the Ministry that financial constraints have also been a major factor for the State Governments for neglecting Fire Services. The Committee is concerned to note that the Central Government has discontinued Scheme for ‘Modernization of Fire and Emergency Services’ in the name of 14th Finance Commission 7 recommendations which according to Committee are not practicable. The Committee in view of this recommends that a serious introspection is needed by the Central Government in this regard to avoid the problems which might emerge due to discontinuation of many centrally sponsored schemes. (Para 3.3.5)
Action Taken 1.3.2 The provision of modern equipment and strengthening urban fire station under Scheme for Modernization of Fire and Emergency Services has been recommended by the EFC/CNE in its meeting held on 20.07.2016 at a cost of ` 1250 crore for the years 2017-18 to 2019-20. 1.4 LAND PORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Recommendation
1.4.1 The Committee expresses concern to note that only ` 80 crore (Plan fund) has been allocated against ` 320.00 crore of the projected demand of the Ministry for LPAI which is almost one fourth of actual requirement. The Committee is of the view that the reduced allocation might lead to obstruction in ongoing as well as upcoming projects and therefore, recommends that MHA should take up the matter with the Finance Ministry to look into this and make enhancement at RE stage. (Para 4.7.6) Action Taken
1.4.2 The recommendation of the Committee has been noted and the matter of providing additional funds at RE stage has been taken up with Ministry of Finance vide DO letter dated 24.06.2016 for appropriate allocation of funds.
1.5 MODERNISATION OF STATE POLICE
Recommendation
1.5.1 The Committee further notes that “The Mega City Policing”, a sub set of the Non-Plan MPF Scheme was initiated in 2005-06 onwards and hopes that this scheme will prove to be a catalyst in terms of establishing robust policing infrastructure and improving safety scenario in six identified mega cities. The Committee hopes that the concerned State Governments will give priority to this scheme, contribute their share and there will be no unspent balances lying with the State Governments under this scheme. With the implementation of this scheme, the Committee also hopes that policing in the identified mega cities will improve to a large extent. (Para 4.9.9)
Action Taken
1.5.2 The Megacity Policing (MCP) Plans of all the six cities (a sub-component of MPF Scheme) have been approved and following funds released:
Sl.No. City Allocation Releases Total
2013-14 2014-15 TOTAL 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Ahmedabad 5.02 10.03 15.05 5.02 10.03 0.00 15.05 2 Mumbai 45.74 91.47 137.21 0.00 0.00 44.997 44.997 3 Chennai 29.49 58.98 88.47 0.00 0.00 29.49 29.49 8
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 Hyderabad 16.03 32.07 48.10 0.00 22.34 0.00 22.34 5 Kolkata 31.92 63.85 95.77 0.00 0.00 31.92 31.92 6 Bengaluru 16.10 32.20 48.30 0.00 40.73 0.00 40.73
TOTAL 144.30 288.60 432.90 5.02 73.1 106.407 184.527
1.6 MODERNISATION OF STATE POLICE
Recommendation
1.6.1 The Committee understands that MPF Scheme is an important initiative which aims at capacity building of the State Police Forces and helps improve police infrastructure in the states. The Committee notes that the utilisation pattern of the States is improving over the years, however, it recommends that the Ministry should pursue with State Governments, which are lagging behind, to expedite works under this scheme in their respective States. (Para 4.9.10)
Action Taken 1.6.2 The following measures are being taken to pursue with state Governments which are lagging behind, to expedite works under MPF scheme in their respective States:
(i) To expedite works under this scheme, the Utilisation Certificates (UCs) for the funds released during previous years are to be furnished by the State Governments duly certified by the competent authority.
(ii) The States are regularly reminded for submission of UCs.
1.6.3 To ensure proper utilisation of funds, a quarterly concurrent audit is being conducted by the Internal Audit Wing of the Ministry of Home Affairs. 1.7 DEMAND NO. 91 (CHANDIGARH)
Recommendation
1.7.1 The Committee also notes the submission that the low allocation under the Head “Health” is also insufficient for many projects to improve Health infrastructure in the UT. The Committee recommends that the Government should look into this and seek enhanced allocation to help improve health facilities in the UT of Chandigarh. (Para 5.18.7)
Action Taken th 1.7.2 The details have already been given in para No. 5.18.2 of 197 report of DRSC on Home Affairs (at page no. 76-77 of report) and an additional amount of `1022.00 crore has been projected which will cover the grant for Health Sector.
1.8 DEMAND NO. 92 (DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI)
Recommendation
1.8.1 The Committee notes that the allocation to UT of Dadra and Nagar Haveli BE 2016-17 is not in tune with what was projected by the UT as allocation is almost half of projected amount. The Committee is not convinced with the submission of the UT Administration that it would try 9 to implement the schemes/programmes with the agreed allocation in B.E.2016-17 and recommends that the UT should be provided with additional fund at RE Stage otherwise development of this UT will be hampered. (Para 5.19.7)
Action Taken
1.8.2 Additional fund will be demanded at RE stage as recommended by the Committee.
Recommendation
1.8.3 The Committee takes note of the schemes/projects to be initiated in the year 2016-17 on Energy security, Health, Rural Development and Housing and Urban Development in the UT and hopes that these schemes will be completed without time and cost overrun and go a long way in development of this Union territory. (Para 5.19.8)
Action Taken
1.8.4 All out efforts will be made to speed up the implementation of Schemes/Projects on Energy, Health, Rural Development and Housing and Urban Development as recommended by the Committee. Instructions on these lines will be issued to the concerned departments.
Recommendation
1.8.5 The Committee takes serious view of the fact that a meagre sum of ` 5.97 crore has been allocated in BE 2016-17 for “Small and Village Industries” which is drastic reduction over RE 2015-16 i.e. `11.98 crore. The Committee is unconvinced with the reply of the Ministry that the reduced allocation will not impact the project underway as there are less project proposals due to slow down of industrial growth and recommends that the Ministry should give clear picture on the issue as “Small and Village Industries” as this is considered to be source of livelihood for many poor people and in view of the Committee higher allocation may increase pace of growth in the said sector. (Para 5.19.9) Action Taken
1.8.6 The allocation of `11.98 crore in 2015-16 was for development of infrastructure of existing industrial estates which has been completed last year. Additional fund in RE 2016-17 will be demanded as one time grant as recommended by the Committee.
1.9 DEMAND NO. 93 (DAMAN & DIU)
Recommendation
1.9.1 The Committee notes that there is under expenditure in Demand No-93 pertaining to UT of Daman & Diu during the financial year 2015-16 which in view of the Committee might have led to reduction in allocation in BE 2016-17 compared to BE 2015-16. The Committee also notes that the grant to this UT is also not in consonance with projected demand as it has been allocated very much less than the projected one. The Committee recommends that additional fund should be allocated to the UT as per the requirement at Supplementary stage of Demands for Grants. (Para 5.48)
Action Taken
1.9.2 All the Departments in UT of Daman and Diu have been instructed to ensure proportionate 10 monthly expenditure to avoid under expenditure for the Demand for Grant during the current financial year 2016-17. The additional fund on the basis of spending capacity will be projected at the supplementary stage of Demands for Grant.
Recommendation
1.9.3 The Committee notes the projects and initiatives likely to be undertaken during this financial year in the sectors such as Forestry and Wild Life Development, Health, Rural Development and Housing and Urban Development. The Committee hopes that these projects will be completed without time and cost overrun. (Para 5.50)
Action Taken
1.9.4 The UT Administration is committed to ensure that the projects proposed during the current financial year (2016-17) are completed without time and cost overrun.
1.10 DEMAND NO. 94 (LAKSHADWEEP)
Recommendation
1.10.1 The Committee also takes note of the major projects, schemes, initiatives, etc. proposed to be undertaken during the year 2016-17 under the health, education, agriculture, energy and allied sectors and recommends that all these works should be completed in a time bound manner. Procedural wrangles should be avoided to fast pace these works. (Para 5.53.12)
Action Taken
1.10.2 Necessary instructions are issued regularly to all concerned Departments of Lakshadweep UT Administration to implement the projects in a time bound manner. Further review meetings will be arranged on regular intervals to monitor the progress of major projects, schemes, initiatives etc., proposed to be undertaken during 2016-17 so as to ensure timely completion and to sort out any related issues to minimize the effect of procedural wrangles.
Recommendation
1.10.3 The Committee notes the various issues flagged by Members of the Committee which pertain to development of social and physical infrastructure in the UT of Lakshadweep and recommends that the Ministry may look into all these issues and apprise the Committee of the action taken. (Para 5.53.14)
Action Taken
1.10.4 Various issues flagged by Members of the Committee which pertain to development of social and physical infrastructure in the UT of Lakshadweep reflected in the report of the Committee have already been circulated to all concerned Departments of Lakshadweep UT Administration for further follow up action. MHA will also monitor developmental and other issues pertaining to the Lakshadweep Islands. Action taken on each issue will be submitted in due course and intervention of the Ministry will be ensured as and when required, where the issue is beyond the level of Lakshadweep UT Administration.
Recommendation
1.10.5 The Committee is aware that none of the items like paddy, wheat or coarse grains are grown 11 in Lakshadweep, though the rice is a staple diet of the islanders. The entire requirement of rice has to be transported from the mainland to the Island. The Committee is also aware that the islanders cannot afford to buy the rice at the market prices as they are mainly rural and tribals. The Committee, therefore, recommends that an additional amount of ` 3 crore per annum should be provided to Lakshadweep to meet this contingency. (Para 5.53.15)
Action Taken
1.10.6 In view of the recommendation of the Committee, UT Lakshadweep Administration will work out a Plan for supply of rice, which is a staple diet of the islanders, at a reasonable price through the Fair Price Shops with its financial implication. Additional requirement of funds, if any, for 2016-17 will be projected at RE 2016-17 stage and for future it will be included in the budget proposals of the respective year. CHAPTER - II
RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS ON WHICH THE COMMITTEE DOES NOT DESIRE TO PURSUE THE MATTER IN VIEW OF THE GOVERNMENT’S REPLY
2.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DEMANDS FOR GRANTS Recommendation 2.1.1 The Committee notes that the procedure for security clearance of proposals relating to Defence/ Infrastructure Projects and Maintenance Policy for the Border Infrastructure (i.e. Border Roads, Flood Lights, Border Fencing and Border Outposts) has been finalised. The Committee would like to be apprised of the same. (Para 2.17) Action Taken 2.1.2 The Ministry of Home Affairs has formulated a policy for national security clearance for certain sensitive sectors of the economy including Defense/Infrastructure projects by codifying all existing practices. The new policy is aimed at bringing about a healthy balance between meeting the imperatives of national security and facilitating ease of doing business and promoting investment in the country. The policy has been formulated in discharge of the mandate of the Ministry of Home affairs to exercise oversight over India’s internal security. 2.1.3 The maintenance policy for the border assets along the Indo-Bangladesh and Indo-Pakistan borders has been reviewed and finalized, whereas in respect of Indo-China border, maintenance policy is under finalization. In respect of infrastructure projects on Indo-Myanmar Border (IMB), Assam Rifles, the operational clearance/security clearance is given by DGMO, MoD (Army) and subsequently the same is submitted to this Ministry. Recommendation 2.1.4 The Committee also notes that the Government has approved 33% reservation for women in direct recruitment for Non-Gazetted posts from Constable to Sub-Inspector in the CAPFs & police forces of all the UTs including Delhi Police. The Committee hopes that assured 33% recruitment of women in these forces will instill confidence among women folk and bridge gender divide prevalent in the society. It should be implemented at the earliest. (Para 2.18) Action Taken 2.1.5 After approval of reservation of 33% for women in direct recruitment in Non-Gazetted posts from Constable to Sub-Inspector in the police forces of all the Union Territories including Delhi Police, Union Territories including GNCTD were requested to make enabling provisions in the relevant Recruitment Rules to ensure implementation of the above decision of Government of India. UTs of Andaman and Nicobar Itlands, Chandigarh, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and NCT of Delhi have made enabling provisions in the relevant Recruitment Rules. UT of Puducherry has amended the Recruitment Rules of the post of Constables. Action is underway regarding amendment of Recruitment Rules to the post of Sub-Inspector; and other posts are promotion posts. Following implementation status has been reported by the UTs (including Delhi Police):
12 13
Sl. Name of the UT Implementation status No.
1. Delhi 88 vacancies of women/ Sub-Inspector (Exe.) were already sent to Staff Selection Commission for filling up the same through direct recruitment. 450 candidates (311 males and 139 female) have been selected to the post of constable through special recruitment drive/ nomination from North Eastern States. Vacancies of 4669 posts (3115 males 1554 female) of constables are being conveyed by Delhi Police to SSC for filling the same through direct recruitment.
2. Puducherry 100 women candidates have been recruited for the post of constables.
3. Dadra & Nagar In the recruitment for filling up of 67 posts of constables, 23 women Haveli candidates have been selected.
4. Daman & Diu 12 women candidates have been selected for the post of constables out of 44, and 03 posts are vacant due to non-availability of female candidates in OBC category.
5. Chandigarh 520 posts of constables have been advertised keeping 260 posts exclusively for women candidates.
2.1.6 No separate quota for women is sanctioned in the CAPFs. However, on 31.05.2011, advisory to CAPFs (CRPF, BSF, ITBP, CISF, SSB and Assam Rifles) to increase the percentage of women in the Forces to 5% was issued. Further, to enhance the representation of women in CAPFs, it has been decided to reserve 33% posts at Constable level for being filled up by women in CRPF & CISF to begin with and 14-15% posts at Constable level in border guarding forces i.e. BSF, SSB & ITBP. This reservation would be horizontal. Order has been issued on 05.01.2016.
Recommendation
2.1.7 The Committee is happy to note that various relaxations for long-term visa (LTV) holders of Pakistani minorities have been approved which include the facilitation for studies of their children, visit to additional places and employment in private sector, easy renewal of LTVs and renewal for prolonged period. The Committee is hopeful that this relaxation for Pakistani minorities residing in India will help in their rehabilitation. (Para 2.20)
Action Taken 2.1.8 The Central Government has been constantly reviewing the hardships being faced by the applicants from the neighboring countries, especially the minorities in those countries, for grant of Indian Citizenship and Long term Visa (LTV). This is a continuous process.
2.1.9 To further facilitate the persons belonging to minority communities in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, namely, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians staying in India on Long Term Visa (LTV),it has been decided to provide the following facilities to such persons:
(i) Opening of bank accounts. 14
(ii) Permission for purchase of dwelling unit for self-occupation and suitable accommodation for carrying out self-employment.
(iii) Permission to take up self-employment or for doing business.
(iv) Issue of driving license, PAN card and Aadhaar number.
(v) Allowing free movement within the State/UT where they are staying.
(vi) Permission for the transfer of LTV papers from one State/UT to another State/UT.
(vii) Reduction of penalty on non-extension of short term visa/LTV on time. (viii) Permission to apply for LTV at the place of present residence in cases where the applicants have moved to the present place of residence without prior permission.
2.1.10 Further it has been decided to simplify the procedure for grant of Indian citizenship to such persons staying in India on Long term Visa (LTV) as mentioned below:-
(i) Empowering the Collector, Deputy Commissioner or the District Magistrate to authorize, in his absence, in writing an officer not below the rank of Sub Divisional Magistrate for administering the oath of allegiance to the applicant.
(ii) Delegation of powers to the Collectors or the District magistrates of the following 16 Districts in 7 States for a period of two years for registration of such persons as citizens of India:-
Sl.No. Name of States Name of Districts
1. Chhattisgarh Raipur 2. Gujarat Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar and Kutch 3. Madhya Pradesh Bhopal and Indore 4. Maharashtra Nagpur, Mumbai, Pune and Thane 5. National Capital Territory West Delhi and South Delhi of Delhi 6. Rajasthan Jodhpur, Jaisalmer and Jaipur 7. Uttar Pradesh Lucknow
In respect of other districts in the above mentioned 7 States, the power to register such persons as citizens of India may be delegated to the Secretary, Home Department of the respective States for a period of 2 years. iii. Reduction of fees for registration as citizen of India for such persons from the existing level ranging from ` 3000 (under registration) to ` 15,000 (under naturalization), to a uniform fee of `100/-each at the time of grant of certificate of registration/ naturalization. Recommendation
2.1.11 The Committee notes that the prime focus area of the Central Government on the Internal Security front will be countering terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir, North Eastern Areas, Left Wing 15
Extremism affected States and the hinterland of the Country. The Committee also notes that the Government of India in tandem with the State Government of Jammu and Kashmir has adopted a multi-pronged approach to check cross border infiltration, promote economic growth, provide relief to victims and strengthen the State Government apparatus. (Para 2.23)
Action Taken 2.1.12 No further action has been recommended by the Committee.
2.2 DEMAND NO. 46 -MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
Recommendation
2.2.1 The Committee takes a serious view of the underutilisation of funds under this grant (Grant No.53) during the year 2015-16. The Committee is constrained to note that the Ministry was allocated `1570 crore under Demand No. 53 (which is now known as Demand No. 46) which was increased to `1751.16 crore at RE stage in the year 2015-16 but the Ministry has been able to spend only `1303.17 crore at the fag end of the last fiscal. It reflects low absorption capacity of the Ministry under the scheme and will weaken its case before the Finance Ministry while arguing for augmentation in allocation. (Para 3.1.8)
Action Taken
2.2.2 Grant No.53-MHA is one of the Major Grants of the Ministry consisting of budgetary provision of MHA Secretariat, RGI, Official Language, National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project (NCRMP) etc. During the year, an amount of `1570 crore was allocated for Grant No.53 at BE stage which was enhanced to `1751.16 crore at RE Stage. Out of the available allocation, an amount of `1689 crore was utilised under the Grant amounting to 96.45% of the available allocation. 2.2.3 Saving occurred under Non-Plan Section of the Grant due to non-filling of vacant posts, less claims of medical reimbursement and non-receipt of the utilisation certificate etc. 2.2.4 Ministry makes all the efforts to make out realistic budgeting and consequently guidelines/ instructions are issued from time to time to all Budget Controlling Authorities under the Ministry to scrupulously follow instructions for realistic budgeting and determine their outlays on the basis of performance and target fixed.
2.3 RELIEF & REHABILITATION OF MIGRANTS AND REPATRIATES
Recommendation
2.3.1 The Committee is dismayed to note that the Ministry has been able to spend approximately 50% (till 29th February, 2016) of allocation made in RE 2015-16 under Relief & Rehabilitation of Migrants and Repatriates (Major Head 3601) as it has utilized only ` 96.24 crore out of allocation of `188.03 crore in RE 2015-16. The Committee is not satisfied with the submission that ` 90 crore is under process for the scheme of rehabilitation package for the returnees from former Indian enclaves in Bangladesh and up-gradation of infrastructure in former Bangladeshi enclaves in India and observes that months have passed since enclaves were exchanged with Bangladesh but rehabilitation package for the Indian enclave dwellers is still not processed. Besides, the Committee hopes that installment of `1.76 crore for reimbursement to the Government of Tamil Nadu for providing relief assistance to the Sri Lankan Tamil refugees will be released soon. (Para 3.4.5) 16
Action Taken 2.3.2 Under Relief and Rehabilitation of migrants and repatriates (Major Head 3601) an amount of `188.03 crore was allotted to this Ministry in RE 2015-16 for providing relief assistance to Sri Lankan Tamil refugees staying in camps, Tibetan refugees and rehabilitation of returnees from erstwhile Indian enclaves in Bangladesh and creation and up-gradation of infrastructure in former Bangladeshi enclaves in India and in Cooch Behar District in West Bengal. `188 crore has been st utilised up to 31 March, 2016 which includes `140 crore as grant-in-aid to the Government of West Bengal for rehabilitation of returnees from erstwhile Indian enclaves in Bangladesh and creation and up-gradation of infrastructure in former Bangladeshi enclaves in India and in Cooch Behar District in West Bengal, and reimbursement to Government of Tamil Nadu of `48 crore including the installment of `1.76 crore for providing relief assistance to the Sri Lankan Tamil refugees staying in camps.
2.4 DISASTER MANAGEMENT Recommendation
2.4.1 The Committee takes note of the mandate of World Bank assisted Centrally Sponsored Scheme National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project (NCRMP) whose objective is to address the vulnerability of coastal community to cyclones, who are generally poor and from weaker section of the society, through minimizing the vulnerability to cyclone and making people and infrastructure disaster resilient. The Committee hopes that this project will be completed in a time bound manner and go a long way in terms of establishing robust mitigation infrastructure to withstand cyclone. The Committee may be periodically apprised of the status of different projects under this scheme and also of the steps being taken to avoid any element of delay. (Para 3.5.11)
Action Taken 2.4.2 The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) manages the project on behalf of Ministry of Home Affairs and has overall responsibility for implementation. The Project Management Unit (PMU), NDMA and Project Implementation Units (PIUs) at State level are responsible for implementation of the project. At National level, Project Steering Committee (PSC) headed by Member, NDMA reviews progress of project at quarterly interval while at State level same function is performed by State Project Steering Committees (SPSC) headed by Chief Secretary of the State Government concerned. To resolve inter-ministerial issues, Project Oversight Committee (POC) headed by Home Secretary, GoI meets whenever need is felt. In addition, Project is being monitored through World Bank Missions and Inspections conducted by Project Management Unit (PMU) officials. 255 Nos. of Multi-Purpose Cyclone Shelters (MPCS), 770 Kms of Roads, 20 Nos. Bridges and 22 Kms of Saline Embankments have been completed under National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project (Phase-I) benefitting 14 lakhs (approx.) persons of coastal community with an expenditure of `1350 crore (approx.). Recommendation 2.4.3 The Committee is aware of the fact that the concerned State Governments have primary responsibility for disaster management in the event of occurrence of any disaster and the States with their limited resources undertake relief and rehabilitation measures in the wake of natural disasters. The Committee recommends that the Central Government should play a major role in the event of big disasters taking place in any State. The Committee also recommends that the Central 17
Government should set up a monitoring mechanism to oversee the status of the rehabilitation measures taken by the State Government without undue interference. (Para 3.5.12)
Action Taken
2.4.4 In the event of severe disasters, the Central Government always helps the State Government with necessary logistics and financial assistance from time to time. Personnel from Army, Air Force, CAPFs and NDRF are deployed at required places to carry out relief and rescue operations. In addition to the funds already allocated/placed at the disposal of the states from the State Disaster Response Fund, additional financial assistance is also provided to the States from National Disaster Response Fund, whenever required, by following the prescribed norms and established procedures.
2.4.5 Since, Disaster Management is primarily the responsibility of the concerned State Government, to have a monitoring mechanism to oversee the State’s rehabilitation measures would tantamount to interfering into the sovereign functions of the State. It may create situations of confrontation between the Centre and the State particularly, where the ruling party in the State is different from the ruling party at the Centre. It would also be against the principle of decentralization. In any case, undertaking rehabilitation work is a sovereign function of the State Government and they should be relied upon to perform their job with a free hand as per their expertise and capacity.
2.5 DEMAND NO. 90 (ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS)
Recommendation
2.5.1 The Committee strongly recommends that committed liabilities under Plan fund (whatever amount it may be) must be transferred to Non-Plan fund. Besides, ` 893.46 crores should be given as additional Plan fund for development of the UT of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. (Para 5.3.5)
Action Taken
2.5.2 Committed liabilities for an amount of `893.46 crores were proposed to be transferred from Plan to Non-Plan in the Budget Estimate (BE) of 2016-17, based on the projections made by different departments at the RE stage of 2015-16. The projection under Plan Section also includes the committed liabilities. The proposal for transfer of committed liabilities from Plan to Non-Plan was not considered. However, while fixing the ceiling for BE (2016-17), Non-Plan provision for the proposed transferable expenditures were accordingly kept in the BE (2016-17) Plan. Additional requirement (if any) will be projected at the RE stage of 2016-17 based on realistic assessment.
CONSULTATION WITH PEOPLES REPRESENTATIVES
Recommendation
2.5.3 The Committee is of the view that peoples’ representatives should have a say in decision making process of UT since it does not have a legislative assembly where grievances of the people can be heard. The Committee recommends that the UT Administration should consult elected representatives while taking any policy decision/development measures/allocation of funds on any Head concerning the UT. (Para 5.5.2) 18
Action Taken
2.5.4 A&N Islands is following grassroots level planning. Plan formulation process starts from the Gram Panchayat level. All the Districts prepare District Development Plan covering policy decision/ developmental measures/allocation of funds concerning the District which is placed before the District Planning Committee (DPC) having representation of elected representatives for deliberation and recommendation.
2.5.5 The consolidated District Development Plan recommended by the DPCs, restricted to the budgetary ceiling for Budget Estimate fixed by the Government of India, is placed before the A&N State Planning Board having representation for deliberation and approval.
2.5.6 Further, major policy decisions are also discussed in the Administrator’s Advisory Council which have members from political parties, trade organizations, prominent citizens etc. besides the local Member of Parliament. It has also been decided to reconstitute the Home Minister’s Advisory Committees (HMAC) under the chairmanship of Hon’ble Home Minister.
Rural Roads
Recommendation
2.5.7 The Committee takes note of the reply and feels that the development of rural roads and maintenance is not as per requirement of the UT. The Committee is not satisfied with slow pace of development of rural roads and maintenance of the same. The Committee recommends that the Government should pay attention to development of rural roads to help improve connectivity in the UT. (Para 5.6.2)
Action Taken
2.5.8 Construction of the rural roads is taken up by both PRIs and Andaman Public Works Department (APWD). Majority of the road work is taken up by the APWD. Efforts are being made for better coordination between PRIs and APWD to avoid duplication of works and also to have integrated approach while executing rural road works.
2.5.9 Almost all the habitations are connected by black top road except some Encroached Forest Area (EFA) and rural village which have sea route connectivity. Major hindrance in rural road construction is land availability and forest clearance which has delayed the progress enormously in addition to limited working season. The Administration is taking steps to connect newly regularised EFA and those habitations which are free from encumbrances.
PAYMENT OF EX-ANDAMAN TIMBER INDUSTRIES (ATI) WORKERS
Recommendation
2.5.10 The Committee recommends that the Ex-ATI workers should be compensated while taking their issues and concerns under consideration at the earliest. The Committee should also be apprised action taken in this regard. (Para 5.12.2)
Action Taken
2.5.11 The Administration has filed/diarised a Curative Petition (Diary) No.19340 of 2016 on 03.06.2016 in Review Petition No.888 of 2015 in Civil Appeal No.1810 of 2009 titled Collector of 19
Land Acquisition and Ors. Vs M/s Andaman Timber Industries and Ors. before the Hon’ble Apex Court. The matter is under adjudication and on receipt of requisite verdict, it shall be disposed of accordingly.
FUND FOR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Recommendation
2.5.12 The Committee is not satisfied with the reply and feels that the allocation is not in sync with the demand made by the Municipal Council. The Committee understands that the Municipal Council is burdened with a lot of work pertaining to civic amenities and improvement of social infrastructure. The Committee in view of this recommends that allocation should be enhanced at RE stage. (Para 5.13.2)
Action Taken
2.5.13 An amount of `36.45 crores has been allocated in the BE 2016-17 for Municipal Council. The council has further sought additional funds for development of newly extended wards, which is being examined. The allocation at RE stage of 2016-17 will be made based on the ceiling fixed by the Government of India and utilisation capacity of the institution.
ISSUES RAISED IN MEETING OF DRSC ON HOME AFFAIRS
Recommendation
2.5.14 The Committee takes note of the submission of the Ministry regarding relaxation of cut-off date for UTs of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep and would like to be apprised of the decision taken in this regard in writing. (Para 5.14.5)
Action Taken
2.5.15 A proposal in this regard was taken up with M/o Finance at Home Secretary level on th 15 May, 2015. Even though, no reply was received in this regard, it is relevant to mention here that the issue was discussed during the discussion on budget at RE stage and no cut was imposed at the RE Stage in the last Financial year.
DA TO THE DRMS WORKING IN APWD
Recommendation
2.5.16 The Committee notes that the allocation to the UT is not as per requirement, especially on Plan side and therefore the Government should consider enhancement at RE stage. It also takes note of the slow pace of umpteen numbers of projects in various sectors in the UT. The Committee is unable to understand the dichotomy between higher allocation and incompletion of projects. Crores of funds are being pumped in the UT but nothing substantial is visible on the ground in terms of social and physical infrastructure. The Committee strongly recommends that policy makers should deliberate on the slow pace of development in the UT of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and come out with short term strategies to achieve them. The Committee also recommends that the Government should seriously look into all the issues flagged by the Member representing Andaman and Nicobar Islands in Lok Sabha and address them at the earliest and apprise the Committee about action taken in this regard. (Para 5.16.3) 20
Action Taken
2.5.17 55-60% of the plan fund is only available for development. All materials for development works are to be brought from mainland. Fragile ecology, Island’s topography and limited working season are constraints for development. Thus, there is slow pace of development. Administration is taking all efforts to give momentum to development. All the spending authorities have been instructed to project their requirement based on realistic assessment. Provisions for Plan expenditure are to be made for the schemes that have been fully worked out and accepted by competent authority viz. SFC/EFC and where infrastructure for implementation exists. Administration has set up an online tool to monitor the progress of all projects costing `4.00 crore and above. Further, continuous monitoring of major projects/expenditure is being done. All the issues flagged by the Hon’ble Member representing A&N Islands in Lok Sabha are also being addressed.
2.6 DEMAND NO. 91(CHANDIGARH)
Recommendation
2.6.1 The Committee notes the submission of the Member of Committee and recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should pay attention to growing crisis of traffic congestion in the UT of Chandigarh. Besides, the issue of declaring Punjabi as second language of the UT of Chandigarh may be considered in view of the location of the UT. (Para 5.18.8)
Action Taken 2.6.2 This is an administrative matter and necessary steps will be taken to solve the issues administratively.
Recommendation
2.6.3 The Committee understands that Chandigarh being the joint capital of States of Punjab and Haryana, is a Centrally-administered Union Territory (UT) where for about four decades, the 60:40 quota system is in place for filling vacancies in the Chandigarh administration from Punjab and Haryana, respectively. The Committee recommends that this system should be adhered to and there should be no violation of this arrangement sanctioned by Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966. (Para 5.18.9)
Action Taken
2.6.4 This is an administrative matter and necessary steps will be taken to solve the issues administratively.
2.7 DEMAND NO. 92 (DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI)
Recommendation
2.7.1 The Committee also takes note of the issues concerning the UT of Dadra and Nagar Haveli flagged by Member of the Committee. The Committee also notes that most of the issues were raised earlier and taken up with the Ministry, however, nothing has reflected on ground. The Committee strongly recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should look into the issues and address them at the earliest. The Committee would also like to be apprised of action taken in this regard. (Para 5.19.10) 21
Action Taken
2.7.2 Instructions have been given to concerned Departments to give special attention to address the issues noted by the Committee.
2.8 DEMAND NO. 93 (DAMAN AND DIU)
REPEALING/AMENDING OF PORTUGUESE LAWS
Recommendation
2.8.1 The Committee also finds merit in the representation made by Daman Industries Association regarding issues pertaining to the industrial development of the UT. The Committee understands that the UT of Daman and Diu, being an underdeveloped UT, should be given incentives in terms of tax holidays (sales tax and income tax exemption) for more years, to stop migration of industry and capital from the UT and subsequent loss of employment and income. Besides, issues of giving subsidies, like power subsidy, Interest subsidy on Capital, Industrial promotional subsidy, in different forms, technological upgradation subsidy, should be considered in the interest of the development of the UT. (Para 5.52)
Action Taken
2.8.2 In the UT of Daman and Diu, exemption from payment of Central Sales Tax is up to 31.12.2017 or 15 years whichever is earlier from the date of 1st Sale by the Medium Industry (MSI)/Large Scale Industry (LSI) registered as such in U.T. of Daman and Diu. A proposal for extension of tax benefit beyond 2017 is also under consideration.
2.8.3 Further, a robust Industrial Policy has already been formulated so that not only industries find an incentive to stay back but new industries are also attracted to the territory. UT Administration of Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli has announced the New Industrial Policy on 22.01.2015 to ensure sustained Promotion Schemes-2015 so as to further improve the conducive industrial climate in the UTs and to provide global competitive edge to the industries. The said policy includes subsidies like interest subsidy on Capital, Industrial promotional subsidy in different form, technology upgradation subsidy etc.
2.9 PATHANKOT AIRBASE ATTACK
FOREIGN HAND BEHIND THE ATTACK
Recommendation
2.9.1 In view of the Committee, there can be no two opinions on the fact that Pakistan based Jaish-e-Mohammad terror group was behind this ghastly terror attack, which was established through interception of calls between terrorists and their handlers based in Pakistan, thanks to their use of robbed mobile phones from Pathankot SP and his friend. Besides, weapons, ammunitions and many items found in possession of killed terrorists are also said to be having ‘Made in Pakistan’ marking. (Para 6.3.2)
Action Taken
2.9.2 No action is required as these are statements of facts. 22
Recommendation
2.9.3 In view of the ease with which the terrorists sneaked into our side from Pakistan, the Committee understands that the attack cannot take place without active support from security and intelligence agencies of Pakistan as four armed men cannot easily pass through heavy Pakistani defence establishment situated near border area. (Para 6.3.3) Action Taken
2.9.4 The NIA is investigating the incident from all aspects.
PREVENTING MEASURE FOR FUTURE ATTACKS
Recommendation
2.9.5 The Committee notes the various measures taken by the Government of India to effectively counter future terror attacks. The Committee is of the view that only security establishment/ infrastructure in place will not do but there should be proper intelligence gathering and timely sharing of inputs between various security agencies in real time which will help anticipate an attack and launch counter terror operations. The Committee hopes that the security agencies would learn lessons from terror attacks of past to avoid mistakes in future. (Para 6.5.4)
Action Taken
2.9.6 Different agencies involved in the Border guarding and intelligence generating have undertaken review of their preparedness and capabilities. Actions have also been taken to plug the loopholes and improving the capabilities. CHAPTER - III
RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS IN RESPECT OF WHICH REPLIES OF THE GOVERNMENT HAVE NOT BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE COMMITTEE
3.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DEMANDS FOR GRANTS
Recommendation
3.1.1 The Committee simultaneously expresses its anguish on the grievous breach of security in Pathankot and Gurdaspur (Punjab) and feels that these incidents put a question mark on our security preparedness and reflects of gaps in our intelligence network. The Committee observes that these incidents put shadow on all other achievements made on the internal security front and hence impresses upon the Ministry to take all steps to see that such incidents are not repeated in future. (Para 2.16)
Action Taken
3.1.2 There was close coordination between the Central Intelligence/Security Forces and the State Security Forces before and during the anti-terrorist operation at Pathankot air base. Due to the well planned, well-coordinated anti-terrorist operation by the security forces and the real-time mobilization and deployment of security forces, all the terrorists involved in the attack were neutralized without any loss of assets of the Indian Air force, which was the main target of attack by the terrorists. There was clear chain of command and control during the operation.
3.1.3 The exact mode and the route taken by the terrorists, while infiltrating from Pakistan, is still under investigation by the NIA. However, the steps taken by the Government to strengthen the security measures and to counter the cross-border infiltration in Punjab border areas as under:
(i) In order to strengthen border domination, one more Battalion of BSF has been inducted in Gurdaspur sector on Punjab Border.
(ii) One pilot project for deploying technological solutions in 2 patches of 5-6 kilometers of riverine gaps and sensitive areas of Jammu Frontier has been sanctioned.
(iii) Introduction of Force Multipliers and Hi-tech surveillance equipments to reduce stress level of troops and enhance the surveillance border. (iv) Upgradation of Intelligence Network and coordination with sister agencies.
(v) Conduct of special operations along the Border and in-depth areas.
(vi) Vulnerability mapping of BOPs along Indo Pak Border are being reviewed from time to time.
(vii) Four Pilot Projects of approx. 30-40 kilometers each in different terrains and sensitive riverine gaps in Jammu, Punjab, Gujarat and West Bengal States have been approved by the Government.
23 24
(viii) Forty-five more laser/IR Intrusion detection system are being fabricated and being installed in Punjab (eight have been fabricated and installed).
(ix) Twenty-Six Training Companies are being deployed on Border for better domination.
3.1.4 However, the Government has taken note of the observations of the Committee and reaffirms its firm commitment to fight the menace of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations.
Further Recommendation
3.1.5 Despite the several steps reportedly taken by the Government to strengthen the security measures, it has comprehensively failed to prevent recurrence of such attacks that took place at Pampore, Uri, Baramula, Handwara and Nagrota. The Committee observes that the Government has not learnt any lesson from the Pathankot attack. The Committee, therefore, recommends that there remains an urgent need to further strengthen the security network and plug the serious gaps in security establishment and intelligence gathering/sharing that have come to the fore in the recent attacks.
Recommendation
3.1.6 The Committee notes that 78% (approx. 12000) Police Stations are registering 100% FIR and an advisory to ensure no discrimination in registering FIRs was issued on 12th August, 2015. However, the Committee doubts this claim and therefore, would like to know the basis used to arrive at this claim that 78% (approx. 12000) Police Stations are registering 100% FIR. However, efforts should be continued to achieve this in all Police Stations. (Para 2.19)
Action Taken
3.1.7 All States except Bihar and Rajasthan which are encountering delays in engaging System Integrators are using CCTNS software. Out of total 14999 Police Stations (PS) in the country 1757 PS are in these two States. 3.1.8 In the balance 13242 PS in the country, presently 12519 PS (94.54%) are entering 100% FIRs using CCTNS software.
Further Recommendation
3.1.9 The Committee is displeased to note that the Government is furnishing a vague and evasive reply to the serious issue like, refusal of registration of FIR. The Committee had recommended to ensure FIR registration in Police Stations without any discrimination so that the common people could get justice but the action taken in this regard reflects filing of FIR through CCTNS software. Filing of FIR through CCTNS software is entirely secondary issue. The main issue is refusal to register FIR by the Police in Police Stations. The Committee strongly recommends that the Government should consider making refusal of registration of FIR by Police Personnel, a criminal offence, and action be taken against such erring Police Personnel. Merely issuing an advisory to the States in this regard will not suffice.
Recommendation 3.1.10 The Committee also notes that the priority of Central Government in dealing with Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is development, ensuring rights and entitlements of local communities and 25 public perception management. The Committee is of the view that development measures should have precedence over security measures while dealing with Left Wing Extremists, though security measures cannot be ignored. (Para 2.25) Action Taken 3.1.11 Development in the States is the primary responsibility of the States concerned. The LWE affected States have taken/been taking various initiatives in the field of development. The Central Government supplements efforts of the State Governments through various flagship/developmental schemes. 3.1.12 The Government is committed for overall/holistic development of the LWE affected States. This is one of the most important parts of the multi-pronged strategy of the Government. Some of the major flagship/developmental schemes being implemented in LWE affected States and their achievements are as follows: (i) Road Requirement Plan (RRP-I): The MoRTH is implementing this scheme for constructing 5,422 km. roads in 34 LWE affected districts, of which 4,092 km. roads have been completed up to 30.06.2016. Construction of 1,330 km. roads is under progress. (ii) RRP-II: MoRD has circulated draft note for CCS to the concerned departments seeking their comments. The MoRD has included 5412 kms. of Roads and 126 bridges/CD works in 44 districts of 9 LWE States having financial implication of ` 11725 crores (approx.). The roads/bridges proposals were selected by MHA. (iii) Skill Development in 34 LWE affected districts: The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MoSDE) is constructing 01 ITI and 02 Skill Development Centers (SDCs) in each of 34 LWE affected districts along with skill training for 5,340 youths of these districts. Construction of ITIs and SDCs is in progress. Up to 30.06.2016, total 4,290 youths been identified for training of which 2,979 have completed or are undergoing training. (iv) Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY): This flagship Scheme is being implemented in whole of the country, including LWE affected States to enable a large number of Indian youth to take up industry-relevant skill training that will help them in securing a better livelihood. Out of 35 most LWE affected districts, 31 are already covered under the scheme. (v) Integrated Action Plan (IAP)/Additional Central Assistance (ACA): - This scheme was under implementation from 2010-11 to 2014-15 for providing public infrastructure and services in 88 districts in the LWE affected States. Under this Scheme, total 1,70,024 projects have been sanctioned in 10 LWE affected States. As on 11.07.2016, 1,65,0681 projects have been taken up, of which 1,42,884 projects have been completed and 22,184 projects are in progress. The scheme has been delinked from Central assistance from 2015-16. (vi) Forest Rights Act, 2006: - Under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, title deeds are distributed to traditional forest dwellers/local Committees to protect and vest their rights and entitlements on the forest land. Up to 31.05.2016, total 14,37,651 title deeds have been distributed in 10 LWE affected States. 26
(vii) Installation of Mobile Towers: Under this Scheme of DoT, total 2,199 mobile towers are to be installed in LWE affected States, of which 2119 mobile towers have been completed. Installation of remaining towers is in progress. Besides, other Ministries/ Department, like Ministry of Power, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Rural Development, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation etc., are also implementing various schemes in LWE affected States. 3.1.13 Progress of these flagship/developmental schemes is monitored/reviewed by the Ministries/ Departments concerned as well as MHA. In the MHA, progress of the schemes/programs is reviewed on regular basis through meetings/video conferences with the Ministries/Departments and State Governments. Further Recommendation
3.1.14 The Committee notes with regret that the Integrated Action Plan (IAP)/Additional Central Assistance (ACA) scheme which was implemented for a period of 5 years in 88 districts in the LWE affected States, was delinked from Central assistance with effect from 2015-16. The action taken note does not say why a scheme that has been successfully implemented for 5 years and was generally acclaimed was delinked from Central assistance. 3.1.15 The Committee would like to know: (i) The status of the 22,184 projects that had been taken up but had not been completed on account of the delinking. (ii) Which State Governments have continued IAP/ACA using their own funds and which State Governments have discontinued the scheme? (iii) Have the State Governments, which continued IAP/ACA schemes, made adequate provision for taking up vital infrastructure projects in accordance with the original objective of IAP/ACA? (iv) What alternative arrangements have been made by the State Governments which have discontinued IAP/ACA altogether to meet the original objective of IAP/ACA? 3.1.16 Since the Government appears to have reduced the emphasis on the development measures by delinking IAP/ACA scheme from Central assistance, the Committee would like to know whether this has been duly compensated by enhanced security measures. 3.2 DEMAND NO. 46 - MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Recommendation
3.2.1 The Committee takes note of the various reasons cited for decrease of `237.20 crore in RE 2015-16 over BE 2015-16 under ‘Non-Plan’ and expresses its displeasure that non finalization of proposal under various Schemes of National Disaster Response Force, non-finalization of proposal of shifting of campus of National Fire Service College, Nagpur and non-finalization of rehabilitation package of displaced Kashmiri Migrants which included providing 3000 Government Jobs to Kashmiri Migrants and construction of transit accommodation in the Valley are some of the reasons for this decrease. In view of the above, the Committee recommends that the Ministry 27 should dwell into the reasons for these delays in many important schemes/projects under the Head and put its machinery into gear to fast pace finalization of these schemes/packages at the earliest. (Para 3.1.6)
Action Taken 3.2.2 Recommendation of the Committee has been noted for compliance. Efforts shall be made to put machinery into gear to fast pace finalization of schemes pertaining to DM Division at the earliest. However, updates with regard to the concerned schemes may be seen as under:-
3.2.3 Shifting of the Campus of National Fire Service College, Nagpur: The construction work of the building for NFSC, Nagpur is likely to be completed shortly. 3.2.4 National Disaster Response Force: In terms of Rule 134 of the GFR, a Committee has been constituted under the Chairmanship of JS (DM), MHA. Director (Finance), IFD MHA, Head (Project of the concerned PWOs/CPWD and IG, NDRF are other members of the Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to monitor the status of development of approved projects in NDRF and to ensure maintenance of even pace of expenditure, so that budgetary allocations made available to NDRF are not reduced at RE stage. The Committee would also suggest appropriate measures to be taken by NDRA/PWOs in proper execution of projects and utilisation of funds. 3.2.5 Taking into account the past experience regarding return and rehabilitation of Kashmir migrants, it was felt that a new package for rehabilitation of Kashmiri Migrants needs to be finalized in consultation with State Government and the representatives of the migrants, who are the main affected party. A number of meetings were held with State Government officials and representatives of migrants which took some time and on certain matters a decision was taken that the scheme may be prepared in phases. First phase scheme for providing State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and construction of transit accommodations in the valley is to be launched. Government of India has approved a package, involving an estimated expenditure of `2000 crore on 18/11/2015 for providing 3000 additional State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and construction of about 6000 transit accommodations in the valley. Approval of the Government in this regard has been sent to State Government of J&K on 04/12/2015 requesting them to take necessary action to implement the proposal at the earliest. Ministry is making all out efforts to streamline the scheme/project. Since the main implementing agency is the State Government of J&K, it takes time for collaborating with the State Government.
Further Recommendation 3.2.6 The Committee takes into account the assurance of the Government with regard to fast pacing of finalization of schemes of DM Division. The Committee hopes that the construction work of the building for NFSC, Nagpur would be completed as per schedule. The Committee desires that the Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation of the fresh package. 3.3 CIVIL DEFENCE
Recommendation 3.3.1 The Committee takes serious view of the fact that during 2015-16, there was no Central financial assistance to the States for revitalization of Civil Defence since all the Centrally Sponsored schemes have been subsumed in the State Plan Funds since 1st April, 2015. The 28
Committee is not satisfied with the argument put forward by the Ministry to justify scrapping of Central support on the ground of so called higher share of allocation to States in the Fourteenth Finance Commission. The Committee is unable to understand why the Central Government in a federal set up is abdicating its responsibilities and leaving the State Governments in a lurch. The Committee is aware of the fact that some State Governments are already hard pressed even in terms of paying salaries to their employees, etc. and it is almost impossible for them to manage additional resources to carry out the plan schemes as per their own requirement. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Government must continue to give financial assistance to the States for revitalization of Civil Defence. (Para 3.2.4) Action Taken
3.3.2 Concern of the Committee has been noted for future compliance. 3.3.3 An EFC proposal for the Scheme for strengthening of Civil Defence set up in the country costing ` 328 crore was submitted to Ministry of Finance for approval but the same has not been agreed to.
Further Recommendation 3.3.4 The Committee does not agree with the decision of the Ministry of Finance. The Committee recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should pursue with Ministry of Finance for approval of the proposal for the Scheme for strengthening of Civil Defence set up in the Country. 3.4 RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF MIGRANTS AND REPATRIATES
Recommendation
3.4.1 The Committee takes serious view of the fact that `174.22 crore only was spent till February, 2016 out of the allocation of `280 crore made in RE 2015-16 for relief and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants under Security Related Expenditure. The Committee would like the Ministry to find out the reasons for under-utilisation of funds for a scheme which calls for immediate attention and take all measures to hasten the pace of expenditure. The Committee would like to be apprised of the detailed action plan drawn in this regard. (Para 3.4.9)
Action Taken 3.4.2 A scheme for providing additional 3000 State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and to construct 6000 transit accommodations in the Kashmir migrants has been approved by the Government of India on 18th November, 2015. The scheme is to be implemented by the State Government of Jammu and Kashmir, accordingly the same has been requested vide MHA letter dated 04-12-2015 to take immediate necessary action for implementation of the proposal at the earliest. Implementation of the scheme is a gradual process. The amount is to be utilized by the MHA by way of reimbursement to the State Government under Security Related Expenditure (Relief and Rehabilitation)-SRE (R&R), against its claim for expenditure incurred in implementation of the scheme. No claim was received from the State Government of J&K in this respect during 2015-16, except some claims against providing a living in Jammu, so the full amount could not be utilized. The State Government is being pursued to expedite the implementation of the scheme. Implementation of the various schemes for relief and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants is being closely reviewed and monitored by the Ministry of Home Affairs. In addition, a Coordination 29
Committee has been constituted for monitoring the progress in implementation of the package(s) for the return and rehabilitation of the Kashmir migrants.
Further Recommendation
3.4.3 The Committee deeply regrets to note that while the Central and State Governments had repeatedly expressed serious concerns about the return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants but the funds allocated for the purpose have not been utilised. The responsibility for return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants rests heavily upon the State Government and the Committee is concerned about the approach of the State Government in this regard as it appears to be callous. The Committee desires that the Central Government should prevail upon the State Government to take up the matter of return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants with the seriousness that it deserves and ensure that the funds allocated for the purpose are fully utilised.
Recommendation
3.4.4 However, the Committee simultaneously notes that the Government has approved a package in November, 2015, involving an estimated expenditure of `2000 crore for providing financial assistance for additional 3000 State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and construction of 6000 transit accommodations in the Kashmir Valley. The Committee hopes that the Ministry would pursue the J&K State Government to speed up implementation of this package in terms of providing jobs and construction of transit accommodations for Kashmiri Migrants. (Para 3.4.10)
Action Taken
3.4.5 The State Government is being pursued to expedite the implementation of the scheme. It has been informed by the State Government that 300 posts have been identified in 16 different Departments and necessary action is being taken for creation of these posts. Authorization has been issued to executing agency (JKPCC) for construction of 400 transit accommodations and about 90 acres’ land has been identified in seven districts in Kashmir Valley for remaining transit accommodations.
3.4.6 Implementation of the various schemes for relief and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants is being closely reviewed and monitored by the Ministry of Home Affairs. In addition, a Coordination Committee has been constituted for monitoring the progress in implementation of the package(s) for the return and rehabilitation of the Kashmiri migrants.
Further Recommendation
3.4.7 The Committee takes into account the steps taken in implementing estimated expenditure of ` 2000 crore for providing financial assistance for additional 3000 State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and construction of 6000 transit accommodations in the Kashmir Valley. The Committee desires that Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation of scheme for filling up identified/ targeted number of posts and construction of adequate number of transit accommodations in a time bound manner for actualizing the policy of return and rehabilitation of the Kashmiri migrants. 30
Recommendation
3.4.8 The Committee also notes that the Government has approved a proposal with estimated expenditure of ` 13.45 crore per annum, to provide relief to the migrants of the hilly areas of Jammu division (who migrated from different hilly areas of Jammu division to safer places of nearby towns due to security reasons) at par with the Kashmiri migrants. The Committee appreciates that they will be provided with cash relief of ` 2500 per head per month (maximum ` 10000 per family per month) plus relief for ration/fodder. The Committee is hopeful that this relief measure is implemented in a time bound manner. The Committee would like to be informed about the steps proposed to be taken to fast track these rehabilitation moves of the Government. (Para 3.4.11)
Action Taken
3.4.9 The Government of India has approved, on 18-11-2015, a proposal for providing relief to the migrants of the hilly areas of Jammu division at par with the Kashmiri migrants i.e. cash relief of ` 2500 per head per month (maximum ` 10000 per family per month) plus relief for ration/ fodder, involving a total estimated expenditure of ` 13.45 crore per annum. The State Government has been requested by the Ministry of Home Affairs vide its letter dated 04.12.2015 to take immediate necessary action for implementing the proposal. The State Government of J&K has issued necessary order of implementing the proposal vide letter dated 19-01-2016.
Further Recommendation
3.4.10 The Committee takes into account the relief package to the migrants of the hilly areas of Jammu division at par with the Kashmiri migrants i.e. cash relief of ` 2500 per head per month (maximum ` 10000 per family per month) plus relief for ration/fodder, involving a total estimated expenditure of ` 13.45 crore per annum and the directions of the State Government of J&K in implementing the same. The Committee desires that Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation at the ground level in a time bound manner for adequate and expeditious relief to the aggrieved individuals. Since complaints come about the lack of implementation at ground level, the Committee recommends that the Government may persuade the State Government to ensure that the transfer of the cash relief is done through Aadhaar linked bank accounts.
3.5 DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Recommendation
3.5.1 The Committee is constrained to note that ` 919.29 crore allocated under the Head ‘Disaster Management’ in BE 2015-16 was reduced to ` 650.99 crore at RE stage due to delay in undertaking the works of development of infrastructure of various NDRF battalions. The Committee does not want to go into procedural wrangles leading to delay in taking off of any project and recommends that procedural complexities should be minimized to fast pace the project concerning development of infrastructure of various NDRF battalions. The Committee would like to be apprised of the utilisation status of funds in the first quarter of the current financial year against the administration sanction order. (Para 3.5.10) 31
Action Taken
3.5.2 The concern of the committee regarding slow pace of the project concerning development of Infrastructure of various NDRF battalions is very well appreciated. As part of the monitoring measures, since March, 2016, 3 meetings have been taken at a very senior level with the officers of NDRF and representatives of the PWOs/CPWD etc., to review the progress of construction works approved for NDRF Battalion.
Further Recommendation
3.5.3 The Committee strongly recommends that the project concerning development of infrastructure must be implemented at an accelerated pace for effective disaster management in the country.
3.6 DEMAND NO. 48 – POLICE
Recommendation
3.6.1 The Committee notes that major reduction has been made under schemes of Border Infrastructure and Management and Police Infrastructure. (Para 4.1.9)
Action Taken
3.6.2 Regarding Border Infrastructure and Management, in actual RE 2015-16, the original BE allocation in respect of Border infrastructure of fence, road, BOP, Floodlights, ICPs was largely retained for almost majority of items. The reduction under coastal plan was mainly on account of non-materialization of procurement of Boats for Coastal Security Scheme Phase-II. It is stated that out of actual RE of ` 2744.24 crore, a sum of ` 2742.34 crore i.e. 99.93% has been utilised. 3.6.3 For infrastructure for CAPFs, an amount of ` 4150.59 crore was projected for 2016-17 against which an amount of ` 2593.82 crore has been allocated in BE 2016-17. Recommendation
3.6.4 The Committee also notes that there is an increase of 12.97 % in BE 2016 as compared to what was allocated in BE 2015-16 whereas there is an increase of 10.33 % in comparison to RE 2015-16 under Demand No. 48. However, this nominal increase does not seem to be in sync with what was projected by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The Committee also notes that the major shortfall has been under schemes concerning Central Armed Police Forces, Security Related Expenditure (SRE), Border Infrastructure and Management and Police Infrastructure which are of vital importance in terms of ensuring internal security in the country. In view of the above, the Committee strongly recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should pursue with Finance Ministry/NITI Ayog for higher allocation at RE stage as reduced allocation might hamper ongoing schemes/projects as well as taking off of new projects. The Committee impresses upon the Ministry to take steps for judicious and optimum utilisation of available resources to ward off any impact of decrease in allocation vis-à-vis projected allocation. (Para 4.1.10)
Action Taken
3.6.5 ` 300 crore has been allocated under SRE Scheme for NE States in BE 2016-17 against the demand of ` 450 crore Enhanced budgetary provisions from ` 300 crore to 450 crore will be taken up at RE stage based on actual requirement. 32
3.6.6 In BE 2015-16, ` 210 crore was allocated under Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme for LWE States. The amount was increased at RE stage to ` 258.65 crore. The entire amount allocated in RE stage has been spent.
3.6.7 An amount of ` 4150.59 crore was projected for 2016-17 against which an amount of ` 2593.82 crore has been allocated in BE 2016-17. Further, demand of ` 12243.25 crore has been projected in the Mid-Term Review of 12th Plan for capital infrastructure.
3.6.8 The border projects along all the land borders of the country as well as the scheme of Coastal Security are on-going schemes/projects and the requirement of additional funds at RE stage will be projected/demanded as per the pace of work and requirement of funds by the construction/ implementing agencies.
3.6.9 The recommendation of the Committee has been noted and the matter of providing additional funds will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at the time of Supplementary Demands for Grants and Revised Estimates stages.
3.6.10 Due care is taken to optimally utilize budgetary allocation through various mechanisms developed for oversight.
Further Recommendation 3.6.11 The Committee notes that, according to the action taken note under Border Infrastructure and Management, the BE amount for 2015-16 was largely retained at the RE stage. Of this, in the case of the Coastal Security Scheme Phase-II, 99.93% of the RE amount was actually spent by the end of 2015-16. If this is the position, it is not clear why in respect of infrastructure for CAPFs, against the projection of ` 4150.59 crores, only ` 2593.82 crores was allocated in BE 2016-17. The Committee would like to be apprised of the reasons why the projection of the Ministry of Home Affairs was not accepted and what prompted the Ministry of Finance to drastically reduce the amount at the stage of BE 2016-17. While furnishing their answer to this recommendation, the Ministry may present the figures in tabular form showing the overall allocation for Border Infrastructure and Management and the amounts allocated for each component under Border Infrastructure and Management.
3.7 NATGRID
Recommendation 3.7.1 The Committee is aware that NATGRID was conceived after the 2008 Mumbai Terror Attack which, many in security establishments believe, could have been averted but for delayed scattered intelligence. It aims to bring to one platform intelligence from over 20 agencies like railways, banks, IB, RAW, CBI, ED, Central Board of Direct Taxes, etc. The NATRGID is expected to use cutting edge technology to place all the details regarding telephone, residential, travel and banking of a suspect on a common platform. However, the Committee is extremely disappointed at the slow progress. NATGRID was conceived in 2010-11 to be put in place in four phases. Two phases were planned to be completed by 2014 at an estimated cost of ` 1100 crore. It is disheartening to know that even phase one has not been completed till date. (Para 4.2.4)
Action Taken
3.7.2 In this regard, it is stated that the work of DRC at Bangalore is in final stage. The Data 33
Centre and BCP, New Delhi was delayed due to the dispute between SDMC and DDA which was resolved only recently and hence the construction could be started in Feb., 2016.
3.7.3 Meanwhile, an Advisory Committee has revalidated the DPR and has also suggested improvements in technologies by incorporating Big Data Technology, Network Level Encryption, use of Data Diode, etc. User Agency requirements have been finalized. Providing Organizations have been taken on board and necessary legal requirements are being formulated. Expression of Interest (EoI) of Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is under issue.
Further Recommendation
3.7.4 The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this in that report.
Recommendation
3.7.5 The Committee is also aware that construction of a building to house NATGRID was given to NBCC after foundation stone was laid in 2014 in South Delhi. It has taken around 2 years to get clearance from the State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SLEIAA), which was granted in November, 2015. Though as per the Ministry’s information, construction has begun w.e.f February, 2016, the estimated cost of the proposed complex is ` 150 crore but the total budget allocation in 2016-17 is only ` 45 crore. It is very clear to the Committee that Government has gone slow on the NATGRID project whereas it strongly feels that this project should be given priority in order to tackle high-tech terrorism which has become order of the day. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Ministry must prepare a plan with clear time-frame within which all the four phases should be completed as per set target and if required, the Ministry should ask for enhanced allocation at RE stage. (Para 4.2.5)
Action Taken
3.7.6 It is clarified that the total budget allocation for NATGRID under the head Major works is ` 59 crore for year 2016-17. The construction work for New Delhi has been awarded for ` 154.25 crore to be completed over a period of 2 years. The demand for major works is a conservative demand, keeping in view the earlier savings in BE. The sanction of building plans is likely to be considered by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) in the month of September, 2016. The requirement of any additional fund for 2016-17 would be assessed and sought through Supplementary Demand for Grants/RE stage. The budgetary requirements for 2017-18 would be planned suitably as per progress of the works.
Further Recommendation 3.7.7 The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this issue in that report.
Recommendation
3.7.8 The Committee is given to understand that NATGRID aims to enhance the country’s counter-terrorism capability through sharing information online and providing actionable intelligence. The Committee while noting the reply of the Ministry, justifying uneven trend of allocation of funds meant for NATGRID since last financial year, hopes that New Implementation Plan (NIP) as envisaged would prove to be successful experiment in terms of cost effectiveness and conducive to 34 maintain strategic control. Since this project is of national importance in terms of ensuring internal security of this country, the Committee also recommends that bureaucratic red-tapism should be kept at minimum to check procedural delay without compromising quality in implementation of this project. Besides, the Government should make allocation as per requirement to help erect necessary physical infrastructure and make NATGRID functional at the earliest. (Para 4.2.9) Action Taken 3.7.9 Allocation already exists for the said requirement for erecting necessary physical infra-structure and making NATGRID functional at the earliest. Further Recommendation 3.7.10 The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this in that report. 3.8 DELHI POLICE Recommendation 3.8.1 The Committee is not satisfied with the implementation status of modernization plans of Delhi Police during the last financial year. The Committee finds that in most of the Plan schemes such as “Modernization of Traffic and Communication Network of Delhi Police”, “Induction of Latest Technology and Capacity Building”, “Public Private Partnership Initiative”, the Ministry has not even been able to spend 50% of the allocation made at RE 2015-16 till 29th February, 2016. It exposes low absorption capacity of Delhi Police which might have led to low allocation by the Finance Ministry in this fiscal. The Committee strongly recommends that Delhi Police should evaluate and analyze the reasons for underutilisation of funds in its plan initiatives and draw an action plan to fast track completion of its schemes/projects without further time and cost overruns, otherwise it would be a futile attempt projecting higher allocation. (Para 4.3.9) Action Taken 3.8.2 Regular expenditure review meetings are held in MHA and implementing units of Delhi Police are sensitized on the issue. Delhi Police has reported that all Plan implementing units have been directed to fast track the proposals for obtaining requisite approvals and all possible efforts be made to complete the proposals/projects within the time-frame and fully utilize the allocated funds during the current financial year 2016-17. Delhi Police has also reported that regular meetings on monthly basis are being held to discuss the status of proposals and review of expenditure for optimum utilisation of budget during the current financial year 2016-17. 3.8.3 The details of BE, final allocation and expenditure incurred by Delhi Police during 2015-16 under Plan and Non-Plan heads are as under: (` in crores) Non-Plan/Plan 2015-16 B.E. Final Allocation Exp. upto 31/3/16 Non-Plan 4979.48 5024.38 5021.95 Plan 390.00 442.07 441.89
TOTAL 5369.48 5466.45 5463.84 35
3.8.4 Additional allocation received for Delhi Police Building Programme and “Induction of Latest Technology and Capacity Building” during 2015-16 has been fully utilized during the year.
3.8.5 Status of the PPP projects as reported by Delhi Police is as under:
z Dheerpur Housing Complex: Due to non-achievement of financial closure by the Concessionaire, the construction work of Residential Complex at Dheerpur could not be started. However, all the mandatory clearances have already been obtained from local bodies on 19 March, 2015.
z Construction of Delhi Police Head Quarter: Approval of building plans of New PHQ building have been received from NDMC on 23 March, 2016. Excavation work has already been started at site. Appointed date as per Concession Agreement has been fixed for 31 March, 2016 and construction work will be completed within 840 days from the appointed date.
3.8.6 It is also added that regular meetings are being held by MHA with Delhi Police to monitor the progress of the projects, to ensure that the same are completed in a time bound manner.
Further Recommendation
3.8.7 The Committee expresses its displeasure that despite mandatory clearance from local th bodies on 19 March, 2015, Dheerpur Housing Complex for Delhi Police could not be started due to non achievement of financial closure. The Committee would like to be apprised whether financial closure has since been achieved and whether the construction of the housing complex has started; if so, from which date. If, despite the passage of 22 months, the construction of the housing complex has not yet been started, the Committee would like to be apprised whether accountability has been fixed on the persons concerned. The Committee would also like to be apprised whether the role of the concessionaire should be examined and whether there are any lapses or defaults on the part of the concessionaire and, if so whether any action has been taken against the concessionaire, including its replacement, so that construction of the housing complex may start immediately.
3.9 BORDER MANAGEMENT
Recommendation
3.9.1 The Committee takes note of the status of ongoing as well as new schemes/projects likely to be undertaken during this financial year. The Committee also notes various bottlenecks coming in the way of the fencing, flood lighting and border road projects such as issues in land acquisition, bilateral issues, protests by people residing in border areas, concerns of some border State Governments. The Committee, in view of this, recommends that these bottlenecks should be dealt with by taking State Governments and people at large into confidence. Issues involving neighboring countries who are opposed to fencing, flood lighting and border roads in any particular patch of border areas should be taken up by the Ministry of Home Affairs in coordination with the Ministry of External Affairs through formal channels. (Para 4.5.3)
Action Taken
3.9.2 All out efforts are being made to speed up the process of obtaining forest/wildlife clearances as well as acquisition of land. Wherever required, matter has been taken up with State 36
Governments for land acquisition. Issues concerning other countries are also being taken up in bilateral talks at appropriate levels.
Further Recommendation
3.9.3 The Committee has taken up Border Management for detailed examination separately and accordingly, detailed observations will be made in that report.
Recommendation
3.9.4 The Committee notes the targets set under Phase-II of the Coastal Security scheme such as construction of Coastal Police Stations, jetties, Marine Operation Centres, boats, Rigid Inflatable Boats (RIBs), large vessels, four wheelers and motorcycles. The Committee also notes the submission of the Ministry of Home Affairs that approval of the Cabinet Committee on Security for extension of the period of implementation of the Phase-II of the scheme for a period of 3 more years, w.e.f. 1st April, 2016 is being sought. The Committee observes that the Phase-II of this scheme was supposed to be completed in the last financial year i.e. 2015-16, however, a lot of work is yet to be done under this scheme. The Committee in view of this, while being hopeful that these proposals would be approved by CCS, strongly recommends that the Government should make all out efforts to complete this scheme during extended time period without any time and cost overrun. (Para 4.5.4)
Action Taken
3.9.5 During the Phase-II of the scheme, the coastal States/UTs were sanctioned 131 Coastal Police Stations (CPS), 60 Jetties, 225 Boats, 131 Four Wheelers, 242 Two Wheelers and a lump sum of ` 15 lakhs per CPS for purchase of surveillance equipment, computer systems and furniture.
3.9.6 Out of the sanctioned components, 109 CPSs have been operationalized and 78 CPSs have been constructed. 35 CPSs are under various stages of construction. Out of the 60 sanctioned Jetties, 22 Jetties have been constructed/in operation. 127 Four Wheelers and 234 Two Wheelers have been purchased. The process of the procurement of 225 boats is presently underway in Police Modernization (PM) Division of MHA.
3.9.7 The observations of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee have been noted. Further recommendation
3.9.8 The Committee has taken up Border Management for detailed examination separately and accordingly, detailed observations will be made in that report.
3.10 POLICE INFRASTRUCTURE
Recommendation 3.10.1 The Committee takes note of the fact that the CPWD has not yet started work on the construction of 80 quarters in NPA, Hyderabad and the Ministry is considering a proposal to increase the number of quarters for construction. The Committee takes a serious note of all these developments. First of all, the CPWD should have started construction instead construction work has been halted. There seems to be something fishy in entire matter and a thorough probe needs 37 to be done. The Committee also desires that construction of 24 quarters being done in NEPA, Shillong should be completed as per the target fixed. There should be no time and cost overrun. (Para 4.11.3) Action Taken 3.10.2 NPA vide letter dated 02.09.2013 had submitted the proposal for C/o of 80 nos. residential quarters through CPWD at an estimate cost of ` 16.55 crore for its staff members and for which the approval has been accorded by this Ministry vide order dated 29.10.2014. However, NPA could not take up the work for construction of 80 Nos. residential quarters due to following reasons:
(i) The Academy has sanctioned 274 new posts in the year 2011. Accordingly, the sanctioned strength of the Academy increased to 692 personnel. To provide proper accommodation to its staff, the Academy is having only 350 Nos. of residential quarters. Thus, the Academy needs to construct 342 Nos. additional/new quarters. (ii) The Academy did not have any exclusive accommodation for the CISF contingent comprising of 199 personnel and which has been inducted in the year 2011 for the security purpose. These CISF personnel from the date of their induction are residing in rented houses far off from the campus, which is not correct from the security point of view, for meeting exigencies. (iii) The Academy had earlier proposed for C/o of 80 nos. of residential quarters in the new land as the request for acquisition of 5 Acres land from State Government was under active consideration. However, the land acquisition could not be materialised, therefore, the proposal for C/o of 80 nos. of residential quarters could not be taken up. 3.10.3 Accordingly, NPA has proposed that it would not be feasible to construct the required total number of residential quarters within the limited available land as per the prescribed maximum permissible limit, it was decided to go for construction of 112 residential quarters with a vertical expansion. As such, it has been proposed for construction of 112 residential quarters at an estimated cost of ` 38.06 crore in supersession of the earlier approved proposal of 80 residential quarters, as this step would also strengthen the security of the campus. 3.10.4 In view of the above, the proposal for C/o of 112 residential quarters of the NPA was due to increase in the demand for residential quarters subsequent to filling up various newly created posts and to meet the need for providing residential accommodation to the CISF personnel for strengthening the security of the Academy campus, the imperative requirement for constructing the required number of residential quarters, the Academy identified a piece of land measuring 1.25 Acres in its own campus which is on the north-east side of Kendriya Vidyalaya Teachers Quarters, Shivarampally and which is well suited for undertaking C/o of 112 residential quarters. Hence, the revised proposal for C/o of 112 residential quarter at SVP NPA is under consideration in this Ministry. 3.10.5 In so far as construction of 24 quarters being executed in NEPA, it is mentioned that all the projects have been started by the executing agency i.e. NEPA and will be completed within stipulated time. Further Recommendation 3.10.6 The Committee observes that SVPNPA is in urgent need of 342 residential quarters not only from the point of view of accommodating its staff but also to ensure adequate 38 security of the premises of the academy. A decision ought to have been taken about the number of quarters that can be constructed (within the limits of land and funds available) and the construction work should have been started long ago. However, valuable time was lost in debating whether 80 or 112 residential quarters should be constructed because, in either event, the number would fall short of the requirement of 342 additional quarters.
3.10.7 The Committee feels that the Ministry of Home Affairs should strongly pursue the matter of acquisition of additional land with the State Government for construction of additional number of residential quarters keeping in mind the security concerns of the Academy. The Committee notes that, finally, the Academy has identified 1.25 acres within its own Campus. The Committee, therefore, recommends that Ministry of Home Affairs should immediately approve the proposal of construction of 112 residential quarters on the 1.25 acres of available land and should request the State Government for allotment of additional land for SVPNPA for constructing additional quarters.
3.11 DEMAND NO. 90 (ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS)
IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING ROADS
Recommendation
3.11.1 The Committee is not satisfied with the reply and recommends that allocation should be made as per requirement of the UT in terms of improvement of existing roads in the UT. (Para 5.7.2) Action Taken 3.11.2 Construction of the rural roads is taken up by both PRIs and APWD. The Gram Panchayats are not able to fully utilize the funds allocated to them. Utilisation certificates amounting to ` 63 crore out of total ` 255 crore allotted to Gram Panchayats for the purpose during the period 2010-11 to 2014-15 have not been furnished. Sufficient funds are being provided to the PRIs and APWD for construction of road. In order to make availability of fund in Rural Development, MoRD has offered to provide fund under PMGSY-II for maintenance purpose of rural road. Approximately, 258 km. of rural roads have been identified for up-gradation and improvement. Proposal is being prepared to take up improvement work of 258 km. (approx.) of rural road under PMGSY-II, which shall improve the progress. Further Recommendation
3.11.3 The Action Taken Note of the Government reveals a dismal state of affairs in the UT of Andaman and Nicobar Islands in terms of construction of rural roads. The Committee notes that the Gram Panchayats are not fully utilizing the funds allocated to them. The Committee, therefore, strongly urges the Ministry of Home Affairs to impress upon the UT Administration to take up the issue with Andaman Public Works Department and concerned PRIs to complete construction of these roads by proper utilisation of allocated funds.
ESTABLISHMENT OF POLYTECHNICS Recommendation
3.11.4 The Committee is concerned to note that there are three districts in the UT, however, only one district (South Andaman) has got a polytechnic and other two are not having any polytechnic. 39
It was brought to the notice of the Committee that the Government of India in 2008-09 with objective of skill development sanctioned two more polytechnics in the 127 districts of Car Nicobar and North Andaman district and still it has not been opened. The Committee takes serious view of this fact, that years have passed and polytechnics are yet to be established for want of land and fund. The Committee in view of this recommends that the UT Administration should provide land and fund without any procedural delay to fast pace opening of two polytechnics in the UT. (Para 5.8.3)
Action Taken 3.11.5 A feasibility report on starting of new Polytechnic in North and Middle Andaman and Nicobar Districts has been prepared by a Joint Committee. As per the report, the capital cost involved in the establishment of the Polytechnic in N & M Andaman shall be ` 43.75 crores and for the Polytechnic at Nicobar District the capital cost shall be ` 51.80 crores. The recurring cost shall be to the tune of ` 4 crores per annum which would then increase subsequently. A DPR in this regard will be prepared. 3.11.6 Starting a Polytechnic at Nicobar District has not appeared to be feasible at this stage. However, this could be reviewed by year 2020 based on the data available at that time. The feasibility study Report is under consideration of the UT Administration and necessary action will be taken shortly. Further Recommendation
3.11.7 The Committee is displeased to note that progress so far in the matter of establishing a new Polytechnic at North and Middle Andaman District is painstakingly slow to the extent that even the DPR has yet not been finalised. The Committee, therefore, strongly recommends that the Ministry must earnestly pursue the UT Administration to expedite the establishment of the new Polytechnic. The Committee also desires to be apprised of the reasons for non-feasibility of establishing a Polytechnic in Nicobar District.
ESTABLISHMENT OF SAINIK SCHOOL Recommendation
3.11.8 The Committee is not satisfied with the submission of the Ministry and recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs cannot wash its hands off just by writing to the Ministry of Defence for opening of Sainik School in the UT of A&N Islands with request for sanctioning entire capital cost of the project as a special case. The Committee recommends that the Government should take a call on this issue and make allocation as per requirement to open up Sainik School in UT. Besides, the Committee recommends that the land required for Sainik School which is available in the UT should be acquired for the purpose. (Para 5.9.3)
Action Taken 3.11.9 Provision is being made in Annual Plan 2016-17 for Sainik School. Identification of 38 acres of land for opening of a Sainik School in South Andaman is in process.
Further Recommendation 3.11.10 The Committee has noted that while provision has been made in the Annual Plan 2016-17, the issue of making the land available for the Sainik School has not been sorted 40 out. As a result, no work has started on the proposed school and it is likely that the provision made in the Annual Plan 2016-17 will remain unutilised. The Committee is displeased to note that the whole year has been wasted in identifying the land and the proposal for the Sainik School has not moved forward. The Committee urges the Ministry to pay serious attention to this matter and to ensure that the Sainik School begins to function at least from the academic session 2017-18.
INADEQUATE ALLOCATION ON ROAD SECTORS
Recommendation
3.11.11 It was brought to the notice of the Committee by the Member representing Andaman & Nicobar Islands in Lok Sabha that unspent balances are lying with APWD which were sanctioned long back in around 2002-03 and the UT Administration is not taking any interest in development of roads under PMGSY. The Committee would like to be apprised about reasons behind under expenditure in this scheme and year-wise details pertaining to development of roads and expenditure under PMGSY and other centrally sponsored schemes since 2002. (Para 5.11.2)
Action Taken
3.11.12 Slow progress was because environment and forest clearances were not given. PMGSY scheme was launched in 2001-02. UT’s Contribution of ` 10.00 crore was released to the DRDA during 2001-02 and ` 10.00 crore was released during 2002-03 to the Zilla Parishad, South Andaman. The Zilla Parishad, South Andaman has constructed 3 roads by utilising ` 5.31 crore and 7 roads transferred to newly constituted Zilla Parishad, North & Middle Andaman along with balance fund of ` 7.50 crore including interest. DRDA has taken up 7 roads works through APWD, of which 4 have been completed and 3 are in progress. Zilla Parishad, North & Middle Andaman has transferred all the 7 PMGSY roads to APWD, 4 roads were dropped and work is being taken up in 3 for which tendering is under process, with total cost ` 12.37 Crore. An amount of ` 12.07 Crore is available to take up the above works.
Further Recommendation
3.11.13 The Committee is concerned to note such an inordinate delay in completion of projects like development of roads under PMGSY sanctioned more than a decade back. The Committee does not accept the argument that slow progress was because environment and forest clearances were not given. The Ministry of Home Affairs should take up the matter with the Ministry of Environment and Forests and UT Administration of A&N Islands for completion of road projects under PMGSY without further delay.
ISSUES RAISED IN MEETING OF DRSC ON HOME AFFAIRS
Recommendation
3.11.14 The Member representing Andaman and Nicobar Islands in Lok Sabha apprised the Committee that no meeting of HMAC or AAC has been called in the last 8 years not to say of inviting him in the said meetings. The Committee is displeased to note that the Ministry of Home Affairs is not giving clear picture of the issues raised by the Member and recommends that the UT Administration should call such meetings on regular basis and invite people’s representatives in these meetings. (Para 5.14.4) 41
Action Taken
3.11.15 Administrator’s Advisory Council (AAC) constituted on 24.06.2010 had meeting on 17.10.2011, 28.11.2013, 18.10.2014 & next meeting is scheduled to be held shortly. Meeting of the Home Minister’s Advisory Committee (HMAC) in respect of UT of A & N Islands was last held on 20.12.2006. Since no meeting of the HMAC was held after 2006, the Committee has become defunct. The Ministry has already taken a decision to reconstitute the HMAC and a proposal in this regard has been initiated.
Further Recommendation
3.11.16 The Committee is not happy to note that Administrator’s Advisory Council (AAC) constituted in 2010 meets rarely, once in a year and after 2014 no such meeting has taken place and the Government has simply informed the Committee that it would be held shortly. The same is true with Home Minister’s Advisory Committee (HMAC) in respect of UT of A & N Islands where no meeting of the HMAC was held after 2006 as it became defunct. The Committee strongly recommends that the Administrator’s Advisory Council (AAC) should meet frequently and peoples’ representatives should be invited. Besides, the Ministry should reconstitute the HMAC without any further delay.
3.12 DAMAN & DIU (DEMAND NO. 93)
Recommendation
3.12.1 The Committee takes serious view of the fact that allocation for “Transport” has been drastically reduced presumably due to underutilisation of allocated funds which got reduced at RE stage in 2015-16. The Committee recommends that procedural delay should be minimised to complete projects without further delay. (Para 5.49)
Action Taken
3.12.2 The reduction in the allocation made during the year 2015-16 under ‘Transport’ sector was due to non-finalisation of two major projects i.e. Purchase of Catamaran (`60.00 crore) and dredging of Daman Ganga river mouth at Daman and sea mouth at Diu (`14.00crore). The UT Administration will ensure minimising the procedural delay and try to complete the project on time.
Further Recommendnation
3.12.3 The Ministry has not apprised the Committee of the progress made in respect of the two major projects in 2016-17, although the action taken report was furnished in September, 2016. The Committee would like to be apprised of the current status of the two projects namely:
(i) Purchase of Catamaran.
(ii) Dredging of the Daman Ganga river mouth at Daman and sea mouth at Diu. 3.12.4 The Committee would also like to be apprised whether adequate provision was made in 2016-17 BE and whether the allocated amount has been spent and the projects completed.
Recommendation
3.12.5 The Committee takes note of the submission made by the Member of Committee representing 42
Daman & Diu in Lok Sabha. The Committee, while noting that most of the issues discussed above were discussed at length in its earlier reports, is concerned to note that nothing substantial has been done to solve these issues. The Committee, in view of this, strongly recommends that the Government should pay attention to these issues and address them on priority basis. The Committee would also like to be apprised about actions/initiatives taken regarding this. (Para 5.51)
Action Taken 3.12.6 The UT Administration has taken up the matter with the concerned authority to resolve the issues raised by the Hon’ble Member of Parliament representing Daman & Diu from time to time. Efforts are being made to address the same on priority basis. The action taken from time to time has already been apprised to the Committee. Further developments will be intimated.
Further Recommendation 3.12.7 The Committee is not satisfied with the vague and general answer given in the action taken note. The Committee would like to be apprised specifically on the progress of the issues raised by the Member of the Committee representing Daman & Diu in the Lok Sabha. The Committee would like to be informed about the issues that have been resolved and the issues that remain to be resolved along with the time line, and which of the pending issues are likely to be resolved. 3.13 DEMAND NO. 94 (LAKSHADWEEP)
Recommendation 3.13.1 The Committee is in agreement with submission of the Member of the Committee that connectivity to the mainland with UT of Lakshadweep is a perennial problem. The Committee recommends that the Shipping Corporation of India should acquire new ships for ferrying passengers as per requirement of the UT. The Committee also recommends that development of tourism sector should be given priority on the lines of Maldives which has same topography and natural beauty to help generate income, employment and investment in the UT. (Para 5.53.13) Action Taken
3.13.2 The 15 years’ perspective plan for shipping for the period from 2015 to 2030 has been received in the Ministry in which 9 new ships are proposed to be acquired. Shipping Corporation of India, being the technical consultant of UT Lakshadweep Administration, has a key role to play on timely completion & delivery of new ships.
3.13.3 UT Lakshadweep Administration understands the role of tourism development for revenue as well as employment generation. A tourism policy has been formulated, in which public sector, PPP mode & private investors can contribute their share. For development of tourism, besides creation of infrastructure, up-gradation of transportation facilities is equally important since Lakshadweep islands are isolated from mainland. Key initiative for transportation facilities are as follows:
(i) Ministry of Tourism has already conveyed in-principle approval of acquisition of 2x250 pax cruise ships exclusively for tourists, (ii) Provision is kept in UT Lakshadweep Budget for acquiring 2 new ferry vessels for inter-island transportation of tourists, 43
(iii) Action is under process to introduce Seaplane operations, etc. (iv) For creation of tourist infrastructure facilities, a DPR is submitted to Ministry of Tourism for construction of transit accommodation at Androth and establishment of eco-friendly tourist resort at Kalpeni under Central Sector other than various programmes under UT sector. Further Recommendation
3.13.4 The Committee takes note of the reply of the Ministry with regard to its recommendation on providing connectivity to the UT of Lakshadweep and desires early finalisation of the perspective plan for shipping to ensure timely completion and delivery of ships for expanding the horizons of tourism sector in the UT. The tourism policy needs early implementation. 3.14 PATHANKOT AIRBASE ATTACK
OPERATION TO NEUTRALISE TERRORISTS Recommendation
3.14.1 First of all, the Committee is unable to understand that in spite of terror alert sounded well in advance, how terrorists managed to breach the high-security air base and subsequently attack. The Committee is constrained to note that despite concrete and credible intelligence inputs received from abducted and released Pathankot’s Superintendent of Police (SP) and his friend and through interception of communication between terrorists and their handlers by the terrorists disclosing that they were planning an attack on a defence establishment, the security agencies of our country were so ill-prepared to anticipate threats in time and counter them swiftly and decisively. (Para 6.2.6) Action Taken
3.14.2 On the basis of the intelligence, a meeting of senior officers was held by the Central Government, immediately. Consequent to the meeting, the Army Units were mobilized, Air Force Commando Guards were flown along with Air Officer Commander in Chief, Western Command and NSG was airlifted to the most possible target of terror attack, the Air Force Station, Pathankot, by the evening of 1st January, 2016. As a precautionary measure, high value air assets were moved away from the Airbase. Subsequently, Army also inducted Special Forces (1 Para) Bomb Disposal Units and other specialized equipments.
3.14.3 The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which is investigating the terror attack on Pathankot Airbase, is also investigating the exact mode and route taken by the terrorists. Recommendation
3.14.4 The Committee feels that something is seriously wrong with our counter-terror security establishment. Despite the fencing, floodlighting and patrolling by BSF personnel, Pakistani terrorists managed to sneak into India from across the border. The Committee understands that in this attack, the role of Punjab Police is also very questionable and suspicious as even after abduction of Punjab Police SP, the Punjab Police took longtime in arriving at the conclusion that their abduction was not just a criminal robbery but it was going to be serious national security threat. The Committee is unable to understand why the terrorists let the SP and his friend off, 44 which should be thoroughly examined by NIA. Besides, the Committee is of the view that the role of narco-syndicate active in border areas of Punjab should also be investigated as the terrorists might have taken help of channels or networks used by smugglers to infiltrate the border, shelter and carry out terror attack. (Para 6.2.7)
Action Taken
3.14.5 The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which is investigating the case, would look into all aspects and it would be premature to point fingers at any individual or force at this stage.
Further Recommendation
3.14.6 The Committee is displeased to note that the investigation by the NIA remains incomplete even after a period of one year. Unless the investigation is completed at an early date, it will not be possible to answer the grave questions that were raised following the terrorist attack including:
(i) Why was no preventive action taken despite credible intelligence inputs that were received; ii) Why was no action taken despite interception of communication between terrorists and their handlers?
3.14.7 While the action taken note indicates the use of Special Forces (1 Para), it is not clear whether the Special Forces were actually deployed to neutralise the terrorists.
3.14.8 The Committee would also like to be apprised of the sequence of events leading to the visit of the Joint Investigation Team from Pakistan and in particular the terms agreed between the two countries for promoting such a visit. The Committee would like to be apprised whether it was insisted that Pakistan should allow an investigation team from India to visit Pakistan to gather evidence and whether Pakistan agreed to the demand; and, if Pakistan had not agreed to the demand, why was the Pakistan team allowed to visit India without a commitment to allow a reciprocal visit by an Indian Investigation Team.
Recommendation
3.14.9 The Committee also recommends that in view of these series of attacks from across the international border in this area, the Government of India should pay attention to effectively sealing the border through enhanced patrolling, fencing, flood lighting, etc. (Para 6.2.8 ibid)
Action Taken
3.14.10 All the feasible portions of Indo-Pakistan Border are plugged/being plugged by Physical barriers. Further, MHA is in process of plugging the stretches which are not feasible for fencing by means of Technological solutions. Moreover, the areas not having Physical barriers are being dominated by BSF through enhanced patrolling, High Mast Lights, Deployment of Hand Held Thermal Imager (HHTI), Long Range Reconnaissance & Observation System (LORROS), Laser, Infra-red etc.
Further Recommendation
3.14.11 The Committee is examining Border Security separately and will address this issue in detail in that report. 45
Recommendation 3.14.12 The Committee during its visit found that airbase’s security cover was not robust and it had a poorly guarded perimeter wall. The perimeter wall of airbase was not having patrolling road around it. The Committee also found growth of long shrubs and trees in the premises which might have helped terrorists in hiding and making difficult for security forces in combing out these terrorists. The Committee recommends that the Pathankot Airbase which is very close to border should be declared high security zone and should be properly secured through round-the-clock patrolling and making it out of bounds for general people residing around the airbase. (Para 6.2.9) Action Taken
3.14.13 A Security audit of all IAF bases has been carried out with the aim to identify potential gaps that can be alleviated by incorporating changes in physical security measures ability to counter a terrorist attack and procurement of hi-tech security equipment to detect and neutralize any threat.
3.14.14 An FIR No. 06/16 dated 18th February, 2016 registered at Police Station Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD), Gujranwala under Section 302, 324,109 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7, 21-1 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997.The Government of Pakistan constituted a Joint
Investigation Team (JIT) on 25th February, 2016 under Section 19(I) of its Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to conduct investigation into the attack on Pathankot Air Force base.
3.14.15 The JIT from Pakistan had visited India between 27th March, 2016 to 31st March, 2016 to collect, review and document physical evidences and to interview key witnesses and victims through the National Investigation Agency, with regard to the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The interaction with JIT was held in accordance with Terms of Reference mutually agreed on the basis of reciprocity. The JIT also informed that they were collecting admissible evidence outside Pakistan under the provisions of the CrPC of Pakistan that will legally enable them to use the evidence in prosecution.
3.14.16 The NIA briefed the JIT on investigations carried out in the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The Pakistan JIT, in turn, shared with NIA the results of investigations carried out by them in Pakistan so far. The Pakistan JIT assured of their full cooperation and promised to execute the LR, which has been received by them. The case is under investigation in both the countries. The Government is in touch with the relevant Pakistani Authorities in the matter. The Pakistan JIT was informed that a team of NIA officials would like to visit Pakistan to carry forward the investigation in the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The details of the visit are yet to be finalized.
Further Recommendation 3.14.17 The Committee reiterates its further recommendation given in paras 3.14.6, 3.14.7 and 3.14.8.
Recommendation 3.14.18 The Committee notes the submission of the Ministry that the NIA is handling the investigation of this case and terrorists belonging to the Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist outfit based in Pakistan have been found to be behind this attack but the Committee would like to be apprised what made the Government of India to seek help of Pakistan into investigation of this terror attack and invite a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) from Pakistan to India. (Para 6.4.2) 46
Action Taken
3.14.19 After the issue was raised by the Government of India with the Government of Pakistan, an FIR No. 06/16 dated 18th February, 2016 was registered at Police Station Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD), Gujranwala under Section 302, 324,109 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 7, 21-1 of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. The Government of Pakistan constituted a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) on 25th February, 2016 under Section 19(I) of its Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to conduct investigation into the attack on Pathankot Air Force base.
3.14.20 The JIT from Pakistan had visited India between 27th March, 2016 to 31st March, 2016 to collect, review and document physical evidences and to interview key witnesses and victims through the National Investigation Agency, with regard to the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The interaction with JIT was held in accordance with Terms of Reference mutually agreed on the basis of reciprocity. The JIT also informed that they were collecting admissible evidence outside Pakistan under the provisions of the CrPC of Pakistan that will legally enable them to use the evidence in prosecution.
3.14.21 The NIA briefed the JIT on investigations carried out in the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The Pakistan JIT, in turn, shared with NIA the results of investigations carried out by them in Pakistan so far. The Pakistan JIT assured of their full cooperation and promised to execute the LR, which has been received by them. The case is under investigation in both the countries. The Government is in touch with the relevant Pakistani Authorities in the matter.
3.14.22 The Pakistan JIT was informed that a team of NIA officials would like to visit Pakistan to carry forward the investigation in the Pathankot Airbase terror attack. The details of the visit are yet to be finalized.
Further Recommendation
3.14.23 The Committee reiterates its further recommendation given in paras 3.14.6, 3.14.7 and 3.14.8. CHAPTER - IV
RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS IN RESPECT OF WHICH FINAL REPLY OF THE GOVERNMENT HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DEMANDS FOR GRANTS
Recommendation
4.1.1 The Committee is in agreement with the view submitted by the Ministry of Home Affairs that the schemes to be included in the Centrally Sponsored Umbrella Scheme called “National Scheme for Modernization of Police and other forces” are of National Security importance and are vital for strengthening of internal security architecture in the country and continuation of support of the Central Government to these schemes is critical. The Committee is hopeful that the proposal of Home Ministry for inclusion of SIS, SRE Scheme in umbrella scheme will be considered as these schemes are vital for Left Wing Extremism affected and other troubled regions/states of the country. (Para 2.12)
Action Taken 4.1.2 With a view to focus on outcomes, to increase efficiency and to enhance performance in the implementation of Expenditure Budget, the Department of Expenditure has initiated the process of rationalization of schemes of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). To this end, the Government of India has re-organized some of the existing schemes in the Union Budget 2015-16, by the name “National Scheme for modernization of Police and other forces” under which the following schemes were covered: Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & System (CCTNS), Special Infrastructure Scheme (SIS) of LWE States and Scheme of Modernization of State Police Forces (MPF).
4.1.3 Further, on the advice of Department of Expenditure, MHA has formulated an umbrella scheme of “Modernization of Police Forces” with mainly two verticals/schemes namely, (I) Modernization of Police Forces of States and UTs, and (II) Security Related Expenditure for J&K, NE States and LWE Areas. Sub-schemes under these verticals include CCTNS, existing MPF scheme, SIS, SRE Scheme, etc. Expenditure Finance Committee (EFC)/Committee on Non-Plan th Expenditure (CNE) appraised the proposals on 20 July, 2016 and presently, note for Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) is under process.
4.1.4 Out of the sub-schemes, which form part of the umbrella scheme, no budgetary allocation has been provided for SIS Scheme for the current year i.e. 2016-17. Matter in this regard will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at RE 2016-17 stage. Recommendation
4.1.5 The Committee is not ready to buy the argument that merely by enhancing the share of the States in the net proceeds of Union taxes from 32% to 42%, the Central Government can justify delinking the SIS from Central assistance. Besides, the Committee is of the view that increasing of share of the States in the divisible pool of Union taxes to 42 percent from 32percent would not 47 48 yield the desired results, as due to the imposition of various types of cesses and surcharges in the BE 2016-17, such as Krishi Kalyan Cess, Education Cess, Swachh Bharat Cess, Clean Energy Cess etc. which go directly to the Centre’s coffers and not to the States, States’ share in the divisible pool is likely to go down instead of 42% as claimed. The Committee accordingly proposes that the decision on modality of the implementation of the Umbrella scheme may be devolved to the States in terms of sufficient flexibility to conceive and implement scheme/programmes suited to their local needs but financial support from the Centre should continue as States, particularly backward States have their own social sector commitments. (Para 2.13)
Action Taken
4.1.6 Keeping in view the importance of the Special Infrastructure Scheme (SIS) and Security Related Expenditure (SRE) Scheme, MHA has proposed for continuation of both the Schemes for another 4 years, i.e. from 2016-17 to 2019-20 as part of the Umbrella Scheme, “Modernization of Police Forces”. The Schemes were approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee (EFC) in its meeting held under the Chairmanship of the Secretary (Expenditure) on 20.07.2016. Draft Cabinet note of the Umbrella Scheme is under preparation in MHA.
4.2 DELHI POLICE
Recommendation
4.2.1 The Committee observes that there is drastic reduction in allocation in B.E. 2016-17 under plan as well as Non-Plan heads. The Committee also notes the details of negative consequences which this reduction may cause in terms of paying the salaries to deployed forces from outside in Delhi for maintaining law and order, procurement of latest gadgets, weapons and equipment, proper maintenance of buildings of Delhi Police, completion of ongoing and new housing/office building projects, purchase of land for new police stations/housing projects. The Committee understands that these are essential components to run and modernize any Police Force. In view of this, the Committee while expressing its deep concern over this drastic reduction, recommends that this should be addressed at RE Stage otherwise this reduction would have adverse impact on functioning of Delhi Police. (Para 4.3.8)
Action Taken
4.2.2 Delhi Police has reported that in view of the recommendations of the Committee, the shortfall will be projected in RE-2016-17 under the appropriate head.
4.3 BORDER MANAGEMENT
Recommendation
4.3.1 The Committee takes serious view of the fact that only ` 3777.40 crore has been allocated to Border Management Department against its projected demand of ` 5045.70 crore for the financial year 2016-17. The Committee feels that the Ministry of Home Affairs should reconsider the allocation as the huge deduction of around ` 1300 crore expenditure over border infrastructure and management projects may not be advisable. Keeping in view that the requirement of fencing, flood lighting and border roads is of utmost importance to ensure proper border management and to check external security threats, the Committee strongly recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should impress upon Finance Ministry to further enhance allocation at RE stage. (Para 4.5.2) 49
Action Taken
4.3.2 The recommendation of the Committee has been noted and the matter of providing additional funds has been taken up with Ministry of Finance vide DO letter dated 24.06.2016for appropriate allocation of funds.
4.4 BORDER AREA DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (BADP)
Recommendation
4.4.1 The Committee notes submission of the Ministry that Border Area Development Programme aims to meet the special developmental needs and well-being of the people living in remote and inaccessible areas situated near the international border through construction of physical and social infrastructure. The Committee, however, is constrained to note that over the years the fund allocation of the BADP has been grossly inadequate to cater to the needs of the border population and the Centre is shirking its responsibility. It is also noted that the budgetary allocation for BADP for the financial year (2016-17) is ` 990 crore against projected demand of ` 1800.00 crore which is almost half of the projection. The Committee is of the strong opinion that the development of border areas should not suffer for want of funds and therefore recommends that the allocation may be enhanced at RE stage to meet the developmental needs of the populace residing in border areas to check their migration from there. The Committee also recommends that the share of BSF under the allocation meant for BADP should be increased from mere 10% to at least 40% as they are the people who happen to be well versed with the problems faced by populace living in border areas and moreover they are much accessible to the people of border areas. (Para 4.6.7)
Action Taken
4.4.2 Regards increasing the share of BSF sponsored schemes from 10% to 40%, a meeting of the Steering Committee on BADP under the Chairmanship of Secretary (BM) was convened on 17-06-2016 where representatives from all 17 states and BGF’s including BSF were present.
4.4.3 Secretary (BM) has emphasized that the schemes suggested by the BGFs should be given due consideration while deciding on BADP schemes and seeking approval. Representatives of BSF stated that they are satisfied with the existing arrangements.
4.4.4 The matter of providing additional funds will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at the time of Supplementary Demands for Grants and Revised Estimates Stages. 4.5 MODERNISATION OF STATE POLICE
Recommendation
4.5.1 The Committee notes that ` 1753.90 crore has been allocated in BE 2016-17 which is a steep rise as compared with ` 662.11 crore as allocated in RE 2015-16 under this scheme. The Committee also notes submission of the Ministry that increased allocation is on account of consolidation of some schemes under the Umbrella Scheme of Modernization of Police Forces. The Committee, however, understands that even this increased allocation is not as per requirement of the States. The Committee is of the view that the State Governments require large sum of allocation to modernize their police forces, to improve police infrastructure and to launch development initiatives in the Left Wing Extremist affected areas. In view of the above, the Committee recommends that big enhancement should be made at RE stage and share of Central Government 50 should be increased on all the projects under the scheme “Modernisation of Police Forces”. Besides, no allocation has been made under the Head “Special Infrastructure Scheme for LWE Areas” which is essentially required for ensuring development in Left Wing Extremism affected areas to check growth of naxalism and recommends that policy makers should deliberate upon this issue and give Special Infrastructure Scheme (SIS) a go ahead. (Para 4.9.8)
Action Taken
4.5.2 The recommendation of the Committee has been noted and the matter of providing additional funds will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at the time of Supplementary Demands for Grants and Revised Estimates Stages
4.6 NATIONAL POLICE ACADEMY AND NORTH EASTERN POLICE ACADEMY (NEPA)
Recommendation
4.6.1 The Committee notes that the fund allocation for Residential Buildings for CAPFs, NSG, Assam Rifles and Delhi Police in BE 2016-17 is very low as compared to what was projected by the Ministry. The Committee also notes submission of the Ministry that this reduction would adversely affect the infrastructure projects of CAPFs and further reduce housing satisfaction level. The Committee observes that out of physical target of 4240 under Residential Building (plan) for CAPFs, NSG and Assam Rifles only 898 could be achieved due to low allocation during the last financial year. The Committee also observes that out of the target of 72 projects of Delhi Police during the Twelfth Plan period (2012-17), only 31 projects could be completed which is not even half of the target. Ramifications of low allocation is already visible in terms of slow pace of construction activities, incompletion of targeted projects, delay in land purchase, etc. Taking into account the submission of Ministry, the Committee strongly recommends that the Finance Ministry should look into this and an increase should be made as per the requirement of CAPFs at RE stage. The Committee hopes that demand of ` 12243.25 crore projected by the Ministry under 12th Plan for capital infrastructure would be considered positively. (Para 4.11.2)
Action Taken
4.6.2 In Twelfth Five Year Plan Scheme (2012-17), Delhi Police has taken up 72 Projects. Delhi Police has reported that out of 72 Projects, 33 projects have been completed; 21 & one part of project (PS Dabri) are under construction which will be completed during the current financial year 2016-17;9 projects are at planning stage; and 06 & one part of Project (DCP/Office & 48 Staff Qtrs. at Dabri), which were held-in-abeyance due to paucity of funds, are now being processed for giving a ‘go ahead’ since funds over and above the Twelfth Plan outlay have been allocated under Delhi Police Building Programme. 2 Projects relate to Extra-Ordinary Repairs & Land cases. Delhi Police proposes to project additional requirement of funds in the Revised Estimate 2016-17.
4.6.3 An amount of `4150.59 crore was projected for 2016-17 against which an amount of `2593.82 crore has been allocated in BE 2016-17. Further, demand of `12243.25 crore has been projected in the Mid-Term Review of Twelfth Plan for capital infrastructure. This Ministry will pursue the Finance Ministry for higher allocation at Supplementary/Revised Estimates Stage, taking into account the requirement and expenditure trend. Against physical target of 4240 under Residential Building (Plan) for CAPFs, NSG and Assam Rifles, 2505 houses were constructed in the last financial year. 51
4.6.4 The recommendation of the Committee has been taken up with Ministry of Finance vide MHA’s DO letter No. 10/32/2016-Bgt I dated 24.06.2016 for allocation of additional funds under building programmes of CAPF at RE stage. Further Recommendation 4.6.5 The Committee desires to be informed of the allocation made by Ministry of Finance.
4.7 UNION TERRITORIES DEMAND NO. 49 – TRANSFERS TO UNION TERRITORY GOVERNMENTS WITH LEGISLATURE Recommendation 4.7.1 The Committee notes that under Grants and Loans to meet Non-Plan gap, UT of Puducherry has been allocated approximately half of the amount projected. The Committee also notes the view of Puducherry Government that the allocation sanctioned is not sufficient to meet the increase in non-plan expenditure over the years. The Committee in view of this recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should impress upon Finance Ministry to enhance allocation to UT of Puducherry under Grants and Loans to meet Non-Plan gap as per requirement. (Para 5.1.18 ibid) Action Taken 4.7.2 The issue for enhancement of allocation under Grant No. 49 will be taken up with the Ministry of Finance at RE Stage after taking into account the inflationary pressure. DEMAND NO. 90 (ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS) FUND FOR PRIS Recommendation 4.7.3 The Committee is constrained to note that the Government of India has not accepted the Reports of the 3rd as well as 4th Finance Commission of UT. The Committee is not ready to buy the argument of the government that rigidity of the expenditure/committed liabilities has made the Government unable to allocate the funds to PRIs/Municipal Council. The Committee in view of this recommends that 4th UT Finance Commission Report should be implemented in toto by the Government in PRIs/Municipal Council. (Para 5.4.2) Action Taken 4.7.4 After submission of Report by 4th Finance Commission of UTs, a copy of the report has already been circulated among all UTs/ Ministries/ Departments etc. for their views/ comments on the recommendation of Finance Commission. 4.7.5 Views/ comments of Stake Holders are yet to be received. After taking views/comments of the Stake Holders, Government will take a decision on the implementation of the report of 4th Finance Commission of UTs. ESTABLISHMENT OF NAVODAYA VIDHYALAYA Recommendation
4.7.6 It was brought to the notice of the Committee that the proposal of Navodaya Vidhyalaya 52 is pending since 2004 and still nothing is visible on ground. The Committee takes serious view of this fact and recommends that all procedural technicalities should be minimized and opening of the Navodaya Vidhyalaya in the South Andaman district should be expedited. (Para 5.10.2)
Action Taken
4.7.7 The Commissioner, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Noida has been requested to depute a team of officers to inspect the site identified for permanent campus as well as temporary accommodation for opening new Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya in South Andaman district vide D.O. letter no.1-6(5)/ JNV/Genl/Edn/2010/2017 dated 13.05.2016.
Further Recommendation
4.7.8 The Committee strongly recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should expedite the opening of Navodaya Vidyalaya in South Andaman District at the earliest by minimizing procedural delay.
INADEQUATE ALLOCATION ON ROAD SECTORS Recommendation
4.7.9 The Committee takes note of the reply and recommends that the Home Ministry should take an early decision in regard to implementation of non-lapsable fund policy for the UTs, as in the case of North Eastern States, so that the unspent balance is carried forward for the next financial year. (Para 5.14.3)
Action Taken
4.7.10 A proposal in this regard is being initiated to take up the matter with the Ministry of Finance.
DA TO THE DRMS WORKING IN APWD
Recommendation
4.7.11 The Committee notes the reply and recommends that the Administration should consider the proposal of granting DA to DRMs who have been working with APWD for a long time, at the earliest. (Para 5.16.2)
Action Taken
4.7.12 The proposal for consideration of grant of 1/30th of pay plus DA to DRMs working in APWD is under examination.
DEMAND NO. 91 (CHANDIGARH)
Recommendation
4.7.13 The Committee notes that there is an increase of ` 313.14 crore in BE 2016-17 over BE 2015-16. The Committee also notes that the allocation is not in sync with what was projected by the UT of Chandigarh. While noting the effect of low allocation on projects under Plan Schemes, the Committee recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs in tandem with UT of Chandigarh should pursue the Finance Ministry to get increased allocation as per requirement of UT at supplementary grant stage. The Committee is of the view that the reduced allocation might affect 53 projects of social infrastructure such as Education, Health, Municipal Corporation, etc. (Para 5.18.6)
Action Taken
4.7.14 As detailed in para No. 5.18.2 of 197th report of DPRC on Home Affairs (at page no.76-77of report), an additional amount of ` 1022.00 cr. has been projected by the Chandigarh Administration which will cover the grant for Health, Education, Medical Education and Research, Grant to Municipal Corporation, etc. The matter will be taken up with Ministry of Finance at RE-stage.
Recommendation
4.7.15 The Committee notes that the budget allocation for the Municipal Corporation of Chandigarh is not as per requirement. The Committee was apprised that the Municipal Corporation has made plans for various development works which will be left incomplete for the want of necessary budget allocation for the Municipal body. The UT Administration has got an extra canal from Bhakra Nangal duly approved by Punjab and Haryana Governments and to get this water to Chandigarh, a canal and pipeline from Kajauli water works are to be built at a projected cost of ` 250 crores and in view of this, the Committee recommends that the Municipal Corporation should be given required amount so that the water problems of Chandigarh could be addressed. (Para 5.18.10)
Action Taken
4.7.16 The detail has already been given in para No. 5.18.2 of 197th report of DPRC on Home Affairs (at pg. no. 76-77 of report) and an additional amount of `1022.00 cr. has been projected which will cover the grant for Health Sector.
Further Recommendation
4.7.17 The Committee does not appreciate the reply of the Government and would like to know whether an amount of ` 250 crore projected for construction of an extra canal from Bhakra Nangal after due approval by Punjab and Haryana Governments for getting water to Chandigarh from Kajauli Water Works, has been allocated to the UT Chandigarh Administration at the RE stage.
DEMAND NO. 94 (LAKSHADWEEP)
Recommendation
4.7.18 The Committee notes that the allocation to the UT is not in tune with projections made. The Committee also notes that the allocation for Health and Transport is also very less. In view of the very poor health infrastructure in the UT, where people are forced to visit the State of Kerala during emergency health conditions which is also a double blow as this UT has very poor connectivity with mainland, the Committee recommends that there should be large enhancement made at RE stage for improving health infrastructure and transport (connectivity) in the UT. Besides, facility of air ambulances may be made at concessional rates for people belonging to UT. (Para 5.53.11)
Action Taken
4.7.19 Under Transport Sector, UT Lakshadweep is facing deficit of funds, for running & 54 maintenance of ships, in Non-Plan side. As such, on the basis of recommendation of the Committee and on assessing the actual requirements, a proposal will be projected for additional funds in RE 2016-17, especially under Transport and Health Sectors, to overcome the deficit in allocation.
4.7.20 As regards the concessional rate for air ambulance, it is submitted that such a system is already in operation so that patients and escorts can travel at concessional rates as compared to normal rates. For example, normal helicopter fare from Kavaratti to Kochi is `5030/-per passenger whereas patients & two escorts are extended this facility with concessional rate of `4060/-per passenger. Further Recommendation
4.7.21 The Committee notes that the UT Administration is facing deficit of funds on Non- Plan side for running and maintenance of ships. The Committee hopes that the Ministry of Finance would look into the issue of requirement of the UT under transport and health sector and approve the projected additional allocation at RE stage. RECOMMENDATIONS/OBSERVATIONS — AT A GLANCE
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DEMANDS FOR GRANTS
Despite the several steps reportedly taken by the Government to strengthen the security measures, it has comprehensively failed to prevent recurrence of such attacks that took place at Pampore, Uri, Baramula, Handwara and Nagrota. The Committee observes that the Government has not learnt any lesson from the Pathankot attack. The Committee, therefore, recommends that there remains an urgent need to further strengthen the security network and plug the serious gaps in security establishment and intelligence gathering/sharing that have come to the fore in the recent attacks. (Para 3.1.5)
The Committee is displeased to note that the Government is furnishing a vague and evasive reply to the serious issue like, refusal of registration of FIR. The Committee had recommended to ensure FIR registration in Police stations without any discrimination so that the common people could get justice but the action taken in this regard reflects filing of FIR through CCTNS software. Filing of FIR through CCTNS software is entirely secondary issue. The main issue is refusal to register FIR by the Police in Police stations. The Committee strongly recommends that the Government should consider making refusal of registration of FIR by Police Personnel, a criminal offence, and action be taken against such erring Police Personnel. Merely issuing an advisory to the States in this regard will not suffice. (Para 3.1.9)
The Committee notes with regret that the Integrated Action Plan (IAP)/ Additional Central Assistance (ACA) scheme which was implemented for a period of 5 years in 88 districts in the LWE affected states, was delinked from central assistance with effect from 2015-16. The action taken note does not say why a scheme that has been successfully implemented for 5 years and was generally acclaimed was delinked from central assistance. (Para 3.1.14)
The Committee would like to know:
(i) The status of the 22,184 projects that had been taken up but had not been completed on account of the delinking.
(ii) Which State Governments have continued IAP/ACA using their own funds and which State Governments have discontinued the scheme?
(iii) Have the State Governments, which continued IAP/ACA schemes, made adequate provision for taking up vital infrastructure projects in accordance with the original objective of IAP/ACA?
(iv) What alternative arrangements have been made by the State Governments which have discontinued IAP/ACA altogether to meet the original objective of IAP/ACA? (Para 3.1.15)
55 56
Since the Government appears to have reduced the emphasis on the development measures by de-linking IAP/ACA scheme from central assistance, the Committee would like to know whether this has been duly compensated by enhanced security measures. (Para 3.1.16)
DEMAND NO. 46-MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
The Committee takes into account the assurance of the Government with regard to fast pacing of finalization of schemes of DM Division. The Committee hopes that the construction work of the building for NFSC, Nagpur would be completed as per schedule. The Committee desires that the Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation of the fresh package. (Para 3.2.6)
CIVIL DEFENCE
The Committee does not agree with the decision of the Ministry of Finance. The Committee recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should pursue with Ministry of Finance for approval of the proposal for the Scheme for strengthening of Civil Defence set up in the Country. (Para 3.3.4)
RELIEF & REHABILITATION OF MIGRANTS AND REPATRIATES
The Committee deeply regrets to note that while the Central and State Governments had repeatedly expressed serious concerns about the return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants but the funds allocated for the purpose have not been utilised. The responsibility for return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants rests heavily upon the State Government and the Committee is concerned about the approach of the State Government in this regard as it appears to be callous. The Committee desires that the Central Government should prevail upon the State Government to take up the matter of return and rehabilitation of Kashmiri migrants with the seriousness that it deserves and ensure that the funds allocated for the purpose are fully utilised. (Para 3.4.3)
The Committee takes into account the steps taken in implementing estimated expenditure of ` 2000 crore for providing financial assistance for additional 3000 State Government jobs to the Kashmiri migrants and construction of 6000 transit accommodations in the Kashmir Valley. The Committee desires that Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation of scheme for filling up identified/ targeted number of posts and construction of adequate number of transit accommodations in a time bound manner for actualizing the policy of return and rehabilitation of the Kashmiri migrants. (Para 3.4.7)
The Committee takes into account the relief package to the migrants of the hilly areas of Jammu division at par with the Kashmiri migrants i.e. cash relief of ` 2500 per head per month (maximum ` 10000 per family per month) plus relief for ration/fodder, involving a total estimated expenditure of ` 13.45 crore per annum and the directions of the State Government of J&K in implementing the same. The Committee desires that Central Government should persuade the State Government of J&K for early implementation at the ground level in a time bound manner for adequate and expeditious 57 relief to the aggrieved individuals. Since complaints come about the lack of implementation at ground level, the Committee recommends that the Government may persuade the State Government to ensure that the transfer of the cash relief is done through Aadhaar linked bank accounts. (Para 3.4.10)
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
The Committee strongly recommends that the project concerning development of infrastructure must be implemented at an accelerated pace for effective disaster management in the country. (Para 3.5.3)
DEMAND NO. 48 – POLICE
The Committee notes that, according to the action taken note under Border Infrastructure and Management, the BE amount for 2015-16 was largely retained at the RE stage. Of this, in the case of the Coastal Security Scheme Phase II, 99.93% of the RE amount was actually spent by the end of 2015-16. If this is the position, it is not clear why in respect of infrastructure for CAPFs, against the projection of `4150.59 crores, only `2593.82 crores was allocated in BE 2016-17. The Committee would like to be apprised of the reasons why the projection of the Ministry of Home Affairs was not accepted and what prompted the Ministry of Finance to drastically reduce the amount at the stage of BE 2016-17. While furnishing their answer to this recommendation, the Ministry may present the figures in tabular form showing the overall allocation for Border Infrastructure and Management and the amounts allocated for each component under Border Infrastructure and Management. (Para 3.6.11)
NATGRID
The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this in that report. (Para 3.7.4)
The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this issue in that report. (Para 3.7.7)
The Committee is examining NATGRID separately and will give detailed observations on this in that report. (Para 3.7.10)
DELHI POLICE
The Committee expresses its displeasure that despite mandatory clearance from local bodies on 19th March, 2015, Dheerpur Housing Complex for Delhi Police could not be started due to non achievement of financial closure. The Committee would like to be apprised whether financial closure has since been achieved and whether the construction of the housing complex has started; if so, from which date. If, despite the passage of 22 months, the construction of the housing complex has not yet been started, the Committee would like to be apprised whether accountability has been fixed on the persons concerned. The Committee would also like to be apprised whether the role of the concessionaire should be examined and whether there are any lapses or defaults on the part of the concessionaire and, if so whether any action has been taken against the concessionaire, including its replacement, so that construction of the housing complex may start immediately. (Para 3.8.9) 58
BORDER MANAGEMENT
The Committee has taken up Border Management for detailed examination separately and accordingly, detailed observations will be made in that report. (Para 3.9.3)
The Committee has taken up Border Management for detailed examination separately and accordingly, detailed observations will be made in that report. (Para 3.9.8)
POLICE INFRASTRUCTURE
The Committee observes that SVPNPA is in urgent need of 342 residential quarters not only from the point of view of accommodating its staff but also to ensure adequate security of the premises of the academy. A decision ought to have been taken about the number of quarters that can be constructed (within the limits of land and funds available) and the construction work should have been started long ago. However, valuable time was lost in debating whether 80 or 112 residential quarters should be constructed because, in either event, the number would fall short of the requirement of 342 additional quarters. (Para 3.10.6)
The Committee feels that the Ministry of Home Affairs should strongly pursue the matter of acquisition of additional land with the State Government for construction of additional number of residential quarters keeping in mind the security concerns of the Academy. The Committee notes that, finally, the Academy has identified 1.25 acres within its own Campus. The Committee, therefore, recommends that Ministry of Home Affairs should immediately approve the proposal of construction of 112 residential quarters on the 1.25 acres of available land and should request the State Government for allotment of additional land for SVPNPA for constructing additional quarters. (Para 3.10.11)
DEMAND NO. 90 (ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS)
Improvement of Existing Roads
The Action Taken Note of the Government reveals a dismal state of affairs in the UT of Andaman & Nicobar Islands in terms of construction of rural roads. The Committee notes that the Gram Panchayats are not fully utilizing the funds allocated to them. The Committee, therefore, strongly urges the Ministry of Home Affairs to impress upon the UT Administration to take up the issue with Andaman Public Works Department and concerned PRIs to complete construction of these roads by proper utilisation of allocated funds. (Para 3.11.3)
Establishment of Polytechnics
The Committee is displeased to note that progress so far in the matter of establishing a new Polytechnic at North & Middle Andaman District is pain stakingly slow to the extent that even the DPR has yet not been finalised. The Committee, therefore, strongly recommends that the Ministry must earnestly pursue the UT Administration to expedite the establishment of the new Polytechnic. The Committee also desires to be apprised of the reasons for non-feasibility of establishing a Polytechnic in Nicobar District. (Para 3.11.7) 59
Establishment of Sainik School
The Committee has noted that while provision has been made in the Annual Plan 2016-17, the issue of making the land available for the Sainik School has not been sorted out. As a result, no work has started on the proposed school and it is likely that the provision made in the Annual Plan 2016-17 will remain unutilised. The Committee is displeased to note that the whole year has been wasted in identifying the land and the proposal for the Sainik School has not moved forward. The Committee urges the Ministry to pay serious attention to this matter and to ensure that the Sainik School begins to function at least from the academic session 2017-18. (Para 3.11.10)
Inadequate Allocation on Road Sectors
The Committee is concerned to note such an inordinate delay in completion of projects like development of roads under PMGSY sanctioned more than a decade back. The Committee does not accept the argument that slow progress was because environment and forest clearances were not given. The Ministry of Home Affairs should take up the matter with the Ministry of Environment and Forests and UT Administration of A&N Islands for completion of road projects under PMGSY without further delay. (Para 3.11.13)
Issues raised in meeting of DRSC on Home Affairs
The Committee is not happy to note that Administrator’s Advisory Council (AAC) constituted in 2010 meets rarely, once in a year and after 2014 no such meeting has taken place and the Government has simply informed the Committee that it would be held shortly. The same is true with Home Minister’s Advisory Committee (HMAC) in respect of UT of A & N Islands where no meeting of the HMAC was held after 2006 as it became defunct. The Committee strongly recommends that the Administrator’s Advisory Council (AAC) should meet frequently and peoples’ representatives should be invited. Besides, the Ministry should reconstitute the HMAC without any further delay. (Para 3.11.16)
DAMAN & DIU (DEMAND NO. 93)
The Ministry has not apprised the Committee of the progress made in respect of the two major projects in 2016-17, although the action taken report was furnished in September, 2016. The Committee would like to be apprised of the current status of the two projects namely:
(i) Purchase of Catamaran.
(ii) Dredging of the Daman Ganga river mouth at Daman and sea mouth at Diu. (Para 3.12.3)
The Committee would also like to be apprised whether adequate provision was made in 2016-17 BE and whether the allocated amount has been spent and the projects completed. (Para 3.12.4)
The Committee is not satisfied with the vague and general answer given in the action taken note. The Committee would like to be apprised specifically on the progress of the issues raised by the Member of the Committee representing Daman & Diu in the Lok 60
Sabha. The Committee would like to be informed about the issues that have been resolved and the issues that remain to be resolved along with the time line, and which of the pending issues are likely to be resolved. (Para 3.12.7) DEMAND NO. 94 (LAKSHADWEEP) The Committee takes note of the reply of the Ministry with regard to its recommendation on providing connectivity to the UT of Lakshadweep and desires early finalisation of the perspective plan for shipping to ensure timely completion and delivery of ships for expanding the horizons of tourism sector in the UT. The tourism policy needs early implementation. (Para 3.13.4) PATHANKOT AIRBASE ATTACK Operation to Neutralise Terrorists The Committee is displeased to note that the investigation by the NIA remains incomplete even after a period of one year. Unless the investigation is completed at an early date, it will not be possible to answer the grave questions that were raised following the terrorist attack including: iii) Why was no preventive action taken despite credible intelligence inputs that were received; iv) Why was no action taken despite interception of communication between terrorists and their handlers? (Para 3.14.6) While the action taken note indicates the use of Special Forces (1 Para), it is not clear whether the Special Forces were actually deployed to neutralise the terrorists. (Para 3.14.7) The Committee would also like to be apprised of the sequence of events leading to the visit of the Joint Investigation Team from Pakistan and in particular the terms agreed between the two countries for promoting such a visit. The Committee would like to be apprised whether it was insisted that Pakistan should allow an investigation team from India to visit Pakistan to gather evidence and whether Pakistan agreed to the demand; and, if Pakistan had not agreed to the demand, why was the Pakistan team allowed to visit India without a commitment to allow a reciprocal visit by an Indian Investigation Team. (Para 3.14.8) The Committee is examining Border Security separately and will address this issue in detail in that report. (Para 3.14.11) The Committee reiterates its further recommendation given in paras 3.14.6, 3.14.7 and 3.14.8. (Para 3.14.17) The Committee reiterates its further recommendation given in paras 3.14.6, 3.14.7 and 3.14.8. (Para 3.14.23) NATIONAL POLICE ACADEMY AND NORTH EASTERN POLICE ACADEMY (NEPA) The Committee desires to be informed of the allocation made by Ministry of Finance. (Para 4.6.5) 61
UNION TERRITORIES
Establishment of Navodaya Vidyalaya
The Committee strongly recommends that the Ministry of Home Affairs should expedite the opening of Navodaya Vidyalaya in South Andaman District at the earliest by minimizing procedural delay. (Para 4.7.8)
DEMAND NO. 91 (CHANDIGARH)
The Committee does not appreciate the reply of the Government and would like to know whether an amount of ` 250 crore projected for construction of an extra canal from Bhakra Nangal after due approval by Punjab and Haryana Governments for getting water to Chandigarh from Kajauli Water Works, has been allocated to the UT Chandigarh Administration at the RE stage. (Para 4.7.17)
DEMAND NO. 94 (LAKSHADWEEP)
The Committee notes that the UT Administration is facing deficit of funds on Non- Plan side for running and maintenance of ships. The Committee hopes that the Ministry of Finance would look into the issue of requirement of the UT under transport and health sector and approve the projected additional allocation at RE stage. (Para 4.7.21)
MINUTES
VII SEVENTH MEETING
The Committee met at 4.30 P.M. on Tuesday, the 31st January, 2017 in Room “A”, Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi.
MEMBERS PRESENT 1. Shri P. Chidambaram — Chairman
RAJYA SABHA
2. Dr. V. Maitreyan 3. Shri Majeed Memon 4. Shri Bhaskar Rao Nekkanti
LOK SABHA
5. Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury 6. Shrimati Kirron Kher 7. Shri P. Nagarajan 8. Shri Baijayant “Jay” Panda 9. Shri Lalubhai Babubhai Patel 10. Shri Natubhai Gomanbhai Patel 11. Shri Bheemarao B. Patil 12. Shri B. Sreeramulu
SECRETARIAT
1. Shri P.P.K. Ramacharyulu, Additional Secretary 2. Shri Vimal Kumar, Director 3. Dr. (Smt.) Subhashree Panigrahi, Joint Director 4. Shri Bhupendra Bhaskar, Deputy Director 5. Shri Pritam Kumar, Assistant Director
WITNESSES Representatives of Ministry of DoNER 1. Shri Naveen Verma, Secretary 2. Shri Satya Narayan Pradhan, Joint Secretary 3. Shri Shankar Lal Meena, Joint Secretary 4. Smt. Jhanja Tripathy, Joint Secretary & Financial Adviser 5. Shri J.P. Bhattacharjee, Statistical Adviser 6. Smt. Mamta Shankar, Economic Adviser 7. Shri Ravindra Chaudhary, Director
65 66
8. Ms. Mercy Epao, Director 9. Ms. V.L. Roui Kullaj, Director 10. Shri Atul Basumatary, Director 11. Shri B.N. Prasad, Director 12. Shri S.P. Singh, Director 13. Smt. Samita Arora, Deputy Secretary
Representatives of North East Council 1. Shri Ram Muivah, Secretary, North Eastern Council 2. Shri C.H. Kharshiing, Planning Adviser, North Eastern Council 3. Shri G.K. Chin, Financial Adviser, North Eastern Council
I. Opening Remarks
2.0 At the outset, the Chairman welcomed the Members to the meeting of the Committee and apprised them of the agenda of the meeting which was to consider and adopt two Draft Action Taken Reports of the Committee followed by the presentation of Secretary, Ministry of DoNER on the General Working of the Ministry. The following draft Reports were considered by the Committee:-
(i) Draft 199th Report on Action Taken by the Government on the recommendations/observations contained in the 197th Report on the Demands for Grants (2016-17) of Ministry of Home Affairs;
(ii) * * *
II. Consideration and adoption of Draft Reports
3.0 The Committee then took up the Draft 199th Report for consideration and adoption. Suggestions of the Members were sought on the further observations/recommendations. On Para 3.1.16, a Member of the Committee suggested that the Government has reduced the emphasis on the development measures by delinking IAP/ACA scheme from central assistance, therefore, the Government should compensate the same by enhanced security measures. The Committee agreed to the suggestion of the Member and decided to incorporate the same in Para 3.1.16.
3.1 With regard to para 3.4.10 pertaining to relief and rehabilitation of Kashmiri Migrants and repatriates, a Member of the Committee suggested that since complaints come about lack of implementation at ground level in providing relief to migrants of the hilly areas of Jammu, the Government may persuade the State Government to ensure that the transfer of the cash relief is done through Aadhaar linked bank accounts so that benefits of the scheme reach the targeted people. The Committee agreed to the suggestion of the Member and decided to incorporate it in Para 3.4.10 of the Report.
3.2 After a brief discussion, the 199th draft Report was adopted subject to the incorporation of the suggestions given by the Members.
3.3 * * *
3.4 The Committee also authorized the Chairman to carry out any typographical/factual errors, if any and if necessary further vetting in the Reports.
*** Relate to other matters. 67
3.5 The Committee then authorized the Chairman to nominate three members from Rajya Sabha and two from Lok Sabha to present/lay the Reports to the respective houses of Parliament.
III. * * *
4. * * *
5. * * *
6. * * *
7. Verbatim record of the proceedings was kept.
8. The Committee then adjourned at 6.10 P.M.
*** Relate to other matters.