General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade RESTRICTED L/1820 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 7 August 1962 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Original: English AUSTRALIAN ACTION UNDER ARTICIE XIX. Notification of Restrictions on Imports of Antibio-.ics The :following communication, dated 3 Auguist 1962, has been received from the Government of Australia: "The Australian Government wishes to advise the CONTRACTING PARTIES that in accordance with the provisions of Article XIX it is imposing temporary quantitative restrictions on. the following items, 280(R) Benaylpenicillin and its salts 280(S) Phernaxymethylpencillin and its salts 280(T) Streptonyein sulphate 285(A) 1 Pharmaceutical preparations etc . of Benzylpenicillin and its salts: Phenoxymethylpenicillin and its salts: Streptomyoin sulphate: Admixtares of Streptomycin sulphate with Benzylpenicillin or its salts or with Phenoxymethyl- penicillin or its salts. "The action has been made necessary following an increase in imports. under such conditions as to cause serious injury to the domestic production of penicillins n Australia and the possibility of increased imports threatening serious damage to streptomycin production. "As delay would cause damage difficult to repair action will be taken as from 3 August 1962. The question of the local industry's normal protective needs is already unde. enquiry by the Australian Tariff Board. The present action is essentially of a holding nature pending the receipt of the Board's full report. Duties on the items concerned are not bound under the GATT. "Followirg evidence of damage to domestic industry, dumping duties were imposed in January 1961 and additional temporary duties in January 1962. This action has, however, been ineffective and there. has. been substantial increase in imports of Benzylpenicillin and Phenoxymethylpenicillin in the six months January/June 1962 compared to the six months ended December 1961. L/1820 Page 2 "Following a recent enquiry, a special advisory authority appointed under the Tariff Board Act found that urgent action was necessary to protect the manufacture of antibiotics and that this protection could be provided effectively only by quantitative restrictions on imports of both penicillins and streptomycin and their preparations. The authority considered action necessary on streptomycin, although imports had not, increased, because of a serious threat from imports in the absence of protective action. "The restrictions will take the form of non-discriminatory quantita- tive licensing on.an administrative basis. Licensing periods will be of six months duration. Licenses for benzylpenicillin and its salts, phenothethylpenicillin and its salts and streptomycin sulphate will be issued on the basis of one imported unit for each nine locally produced units purchased after 2 August 1962. For preparations, licenses will be issued at an annual rate of 20 per cent of imports in 1961/62. Licenses without regard to the above qualifications will be issued for: (i) Goods in transit for Australia on 2 June 1962; (ii) Goods which are not reasonably available from Australian production; (iii) Goods needed for replacement of imported penicillins and stireptonmyein used in the preparation of formulations which have been exported on or after 5 August 1962. "The temporary duties imposed on the items in January 1962.are being withdrawn with the introduction of the quantitative restricc.ons.. "Relevant import statistics are: Benzylpenicillin - Tariff Items 280(A) and ex .285(A)1 Mega July/December 1961 2,156,536 January/June 1962 3,755,590 Phenoxymethylpenicillin - Tariff Items 280(S) and ex 285(A)1 Kgs. July/December 1961 3,997 Janary/June 1962 7,044 Streptomycin Sulphate - Tariff Items280(T) and ex 285(A)1 Kgs. July/December 1961 522 *January/June 1962 143 L/1820 Page 3 "Imports by countries in 1961/62 were: Benzylpenicillin Thousand Mega United States 4,060 France 935 United Kingdom 707 German Federal Republic 152 Denmark 50 Netherlands 6 Total 5,910 Phenoxvmethylpenicillin Kgs. United States 9,620 United Kingdom 1.313 Austria 93 Denmark 15 Total 11,041 Streptomycin Sulphate Kgs. United Kingdom 570 France 90 United States 5 Total 665 "Substantial suppliers have been informed of the proposed action. Australia is willing to consult as provided for in paragraph 2 of Article XIX witih those contracting parties having a substantial interest as exporters in respect of the proposed action.".
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

—— Preview end. ——

Recommended publications
  • December 11, 1961 Comments of N. S. Khrushchev, 11 December 1961
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 11, 1961 Comments of N. S. Khrushchev, 11 December 1961 Citation: “Comments of N. S. Khrushchev, 11 December 1961,” December 11, 1961, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, APRF, Fond 52, Opis 1, Delo 598, List 79-94. Published in ''Istochnik'', (Moscow) No. 6, 2003, pp. 122-127. Translated for CWIHP by Gary Goldberg. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113340 Summary: Krushchev dictates his ideas for a general memorandum that he will give to Kroll. The memorandum will describe the situation in Germany and the possible development of Soviet-West German relations. It should demonstrate to West Germany the economic and political advantages of improving its relationship with the Soviet Union. Khrushchev describes the potential for West Germany's allies to capitalize on Cold War tensions in Germany and concludes that better relations with the Soviet Union will make West Germany a more active force in East-West relations and lead to a more stable balance of power. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation First I would like to talk so that you understand [me] and then I will dictate what the nature of this document should be. I would consider it necessary to prepare a memorandum, a memorandum of an impersonal nature; neither from me nor the MID [Ministry of Foreign Affairs], nor from anyone to anyone. This memorandum is to describe the essence of the situation that has now developed in the world and especially the question of Germany, the solution to the German question, and the further development of relations between the Soviet Union and the Federal Republic of Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • N.A.A. BULLETIN August (� Ap in Three Sections 1962 � � II�U� Section 3
    N.A.A. BULLETIN August (� Ap In Three Sections 1962 � � II�U� Section 3 1.919' S Topical Index to Volume XLIII of N.A.A. BULLETIN and Special Publications Section 1 Research Reports Accounting Practice Reports SEPTEMBER 1961 THROUGH AUGUST 1962 Topical Index Accounting Background for Management - Accounting Techniques. ERIC L. KOHLER. October, 1961. Emerging Role of Mathematical Methodology in Accountancy. NORTON M. BEDFORD, CHARLES H. GRIFFIN and THOMAS H. WILLIAMS. June, 1962. Emerging Tools for Managerial Accounting. NORTON M. BEDFORD. October, 1961. Management Accountant's Opportunity in the Present Business Climate, The. WILLIAM H. FRANKLIN. October, 1961. Accounting Systems (See Systems and Procedures) Accounts Payable Accounting for Payables —A Tabulating Procedure. ELMER B. FISHER. September, 1961. Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Information for the Credit Department. JAMES D. CRAIG. July, 1962. Order Entry- Billing —Key to Standard Profit Analysis. ROBERT H. SCHWINN. July, 1962. Small Order in Large and Small Business, The. DAVID E. HENDERSON. December, 1961. Administrative Expense Control of Administrative Expenses in Banking, The. RICHARD J. POWELL. May, 1962. Management Costs Can Be Controlled. FRED R. GRANT. May, 1962. Advertising (See Distribution) Airplane Construction and Transportation EDP Control of Detail Parts in Airframe Manufacturing. CHARLES T. BARRETT. December, 1961. Effective Overhead Budgeting. KENNETH E. MCMULLEN. September, 1961. Input - Output Relationships as a Forecasting Tool. R. L. DRESSEL. June, 1962. Assets —Fixed (See also Return on Investment) Doubtful Areas in Lease Capitalization. CHARLES G. WALKER. March, 1962. Management Planning of Capital Allocations to Business Activities. JOHN V. JAMES. September, 1961. Practical Application of Present -Value Technique, A. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Almanac, December 1961, Vol. 8, No. 4
    VOL. 8, NO. 4 DECEMBER 1961 University Preparing for Accreditation Visits in 1963 Academic officials of the University and its various Dr. Bradley will serve as coordinator of the work of the Schools were urged by Dr. Sculley Bradley, Vice-Provost, three sub-committees. during mid-November to consider ways in which they may The sub-committee on financial-academic decisions assist in preparing data for the decennial evaluation of the (Continued on Page 3) University, to be conducted in November, 1963, by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools. Summer Research Grants Evaluations of each member institution are undertaken To Be Available for 1962 by the Association at stated intervals as a means of main- The on the Advancement academic standards. In the instance, how- Committee of Research plans taining coming to offer a number of Special Summer Research Grants for ever, the Association has informed the University of a The new which accreditation can be combined 1962. awards provide one thousand dollars each to procedure by full-time members of the Faculty. Grantees are expected with assistance to the institution in its internal educa- to the summer tional devote months exclusively to the project planning. approved by the Committee. To gain the greatest possible benefit from this new Applications for these grants should be made by letter form of cooperative evaluation, the University has under- to the Committee Secretary, Dr. E. R. Nixon, 103 Bennett taken at the request of the Association to prepare the Hall, before February 1, 1962. Announcement of the following in the present academic year: awards will be made by about March 1, but payments of its usually are not available until July 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense : Robert S. Mcnamara
    The Ascendancy of the Secretary ofJULY Defense 2013 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Cover Photo: Secretary Robert S. McNamara, Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor, and President John F. Kennedy at the White House, January 1963 Source: Robert Knudson/John F. Kennedy Library, used with permission. Cover Design: OSD Graphics, Pentagon. Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara 1961-1963 Special Study 4 Series Editors Erin R. Mahan, Ph.D. Chief Historian, Office of the Secretary of Defense Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. President, Larsen Consulting Group Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense July 2013 ii iii Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 4 The Ascendancy of the Secretary of Defense Contents This study was reviewed for declassification by the appropriate U.S. Government departments and agencies and cleared for release. The study is an official publication of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Foreword..........................................vii but inasmuch as the text has not been considered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, it must be construed as descriptive only and does Executive Summary...................................ix not constitute the official position of OSD on any subject. Restructuring the National Security Council ................2 Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line in included.
    [Show full text]
  • L/1633 TARIFFS and TRADE 24 November 1961 Limited Distribution CONTRACTING Partiesoriginal: English Nineteenth Session
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/1633 TARIFFS AND TRADE 24 November 1961 Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIESOriginal: English Nineteenth Session NEW ZEALAND - RENEGOTIATION OF SCHEDULE XIII Request for Further Extension With reference to item 40 in the agenda for the nineteenth session, the Government of New Zealand has submitted the following communication: "By their Decision of 4 June 1960 the CONTRACTING PARTIES suspended the application of Article II of the General Agreement to the extent necessary to enable New Zealand, subject to specified conditions, to introduce a new Customs Tariff (involving changes in Schedule XIII) without fulfilling the requirement of prior negotiation. "By their further Decision of 18 November 1960 the CONTRACTING PARTIES extended until 31 December 1961 the period during which effect might be given to the New Zealand tariff pursuant to the Decision of 4 June 1960 and during which the consequent negotiations and consulta- tions should be completed. "Information concerning the changes in Schedule XIII was submitted to contracting parties on 26 September and the New Zealand delegation has been ready to undertake negotiations since 2 October. While every effort will be made to complete the negotiations by 31 December 1961 it seems unlikely, judging from the experience of other countries that this will be possible. "It is necessary therefore to request the further extension of the Decision of 4 June 1960 to 31 December 1962." If the CONTRACTING PARTIES agree to extend the waiver, in compliance with the
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights During the Kennedy Administration, 1961-1963
    CIVIL RIGHTS DURING THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION, 1961-1963 Part 1: The White House Central Files and Staff Files and the President's Office Files UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCES: Microfilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections August Meier and Elliott Rudwick General Editors CIVIL RIGHTS DURING THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION, 1961-1963 Part 1: The White House Central Files and Staff Files and the President's Office Files CIVIL RIGHTS DURING THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION, 1961-1963 Part 1: The White House Central Files and Staff Files and the President's Office Files A collection from the holdings of The John F. Kennedy Library, Boston, Massachusetts Edited by Carl M. Brauer Associate Editor Robert Lester Guide Compiled by Martin Schipper A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA, INC. 44 North Market Street • Frederick, MD 21701 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Civil rights during the Kennedy administration, 1961-1963 [microform]. (Black studies research sources: microfilms from major archival and manuscript collections) Contents: pt. 1. The White House central files and staff files and the president's office files/ edited by Carl M. Brauer. 1. Civil rights—United States—History—Sources. 2. United States—Politics and government—1961-1963— Sources. 3. John F. Kennedy Library. I. Brauer, Carl M., 1946- . II. John F. Kennedy Library. [JC599] 323.4'0973 87-2061 ISBN 0-89093-900-4 (pt. 1) Copyright ® 1986 by University Publications of America, Inc. All rights reserved. ISBN
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, July-August 1962
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1962 Special Libraries, 1960s 7-1-1962 Special Libraries, July-August 1962 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, July-August 1962" (1962). Special Libraries, 1962. 6. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962/6 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1960s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1962 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact scholarworks@sjsu.edu. SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION Putting Knowledge to Work OFFICERS DIRECTORS President SARAAULL ETHELS. KLAHRE Uniz;evsity of Hou rton Federal Reserve Bank of Clevela~zd,Clel,eland, Ohio Houston 4, Texas First Vice-president and President-Elect JOANM. HUTCHINSON MRS.MILDRED H. BRODE Research Center, Diamond Alk.11; David Taylor Model Bath. W~shiu,qio~r.D. C. Comparzj, Paiwes~,ille.Ohjo Second Vice-president PAULW. RILEY ROBERTW. GIBSON,JR. College of BusI'ne.t.r Adminirfviitiu~i Thomas J. Watron Research Cet//rv. Ydmzm Bosiott College Height.r, New Yovk Che~t~utHill, Ma.r.rachuset/.r Secretary MRS.JEANNE B. NORTH MRS. ELIZABETHB. ROTH Lockheed Missi1e.r 6 Sp~crDil~isiou. P.do Alto. Stundard Oil Company of Callfor- Culiforniil niil, San Frawrisro, Cdifor~zia Treasurer EDWARDG. STRABLE RALPHH. PHELPS J. Walter Thompsorz Compnizj Ettgineering Societie.~L;brar). A-ew Yvrk, Nru York Chicago, Illinois Immediate Past-President MRS.ELIZABETH R.
    [Show full text]
  • Recession to Recovery, 1960-62 May • 1962^ Case Study in Flexible Monetary Policy
    May 1962 A M Iu Review A tlan ta , Recession to Recovery, 1960-62 May • 1962^ Case Study in Flexible Monetary Policy MAY 2 3 1962 Function of the Federal Reserve System. An efficient onetary mechanism is indispensable to the steady develop­ FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF e d of the nation’s resources and a rising standard of living. The function of the Federal Reserve System is to foster a Also in this issue: flow of credit and money that will facilitate orderly economic growth and a stable dollar.— the federal reserve system : PURPOSES AND FUNCTIONS HESITANT RECOVERY Monetary policy decisions are made in response to the current state of the American economy. Because our economy is complex, monetary IN ALABAMA policy making and its execution must, therefore, be complex. The necessity for making qualitative judgments only increases this com­ plexity. For example, few persons would disagree with the general goals SIXTH DISTRICT implied by the statement at the beginning of this article. Opinions do STATISTICS differ, however, with respect to the effectiveness of monetary policy in achieving these goals and with respect to which goals should be given priority in case of conflict. Furthermore, interpretations of current economic developments are by no means unanimous; nor is there com­ DISTRICT BUSINESS plete agreement as to which techniques could be best used in executing CONDITIONS the chosen policy. The complexities involved in determining and executing monetary policy are exceptionally well illustrated in the period from early 1960 to the present. This was a period of both recession and recovery and, in addition, one in which special problems were created by the United States’ balance of payments position.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED W.19/19 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 8 December 1961 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Nineteenth Session NEWLY-INDEPENDENT STATES Recommrendation of 18 November 19.30 (Note by the Executive Secretary) The Recommendation of' 18 November 1960(9S/16) provides for the de facto application of the CATT between contracting parties and territories which acquire fully autonomy in the conduct of their external commercial relations and to which the GATT wasformerly applied by the metropolitan power. The period of de facto aapplication ends two years after the date of independence. This Recommendation is at present applicaible in respect of the following States until the dates indicated: Cameroon-1 (1 January 1962) Ivory Coast (7 August 1962) Central African Repoublic (141 August 1962) Madagascar (25 June 1932) Chad (11 August 1932) Mali ( 20 June 1932) Congo (Brazzaville) (15 August 1962) Mauritania (28 November 1962) Congo (Leopoldville (50 June 1932) Niger (3 Augzust 1962) Cyprus (16 Auguust 1932) Senegal (20 June 1962) Dahomey (1 August 1)932) Togo (27 April 1962) Gabon (17 August 1932) Upper Volta (5 August 1962) The Governments of the Rei:ublic of Camersoen (L/1653) and the Republic of' Congo (Lecocidville) (L/1563) have requested an extension of the time-limit, a.s it will not be possible for them to take decisions in this matter within the two-yearperiod. Other States may also wish to have a longer period in which to decide upon their future relations with the GATT. It is therefore suggested, for consideration by the CONTRACTING PARTIES, that the Recomniendation of 18 November 1960 might be extended for one year for any State which requests an extension, In the event that the CONTRACTING PARTIES wish to actupon this suggestion the following text of a decision miht be considered: W.19/19 Page 2 DRAFTDECISION CONSIDERING that the CONTRACTING PARTIES recommended on 18 November 19(0 that contracing parties should continue to apply de factor the Ceneral Agreement in their relations with any territory which acquires full.
    [Show full text]
  • 26 September 1960
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/1298 TARIFFS AND TRADE 26 1960 LimitedSeptemberDistribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Original: English Seventeenth Session RENEGOTLATIONOF SCHEDULE XIII - NEW ZEALAND (Decision of 4 Tune 1960)1 Request for Extension of Period The following communication, dated 19 September 1960, has been received from the Delegation of NewZealand: "By this Decision of 4 June 1960 the CONTRACTING PARTIES suspended the application of the provisions of Article II of the generall Agreement to the extent necessary tc enable New; Zealand to apply, subject tc specified conditions, the new customs tariff simultaneously .with its submissionto the New Zealand Parliament. "The CONTRACTING PARTIES undertook to decide at the seventeenth session upon any additional period Subsequent to 31 December 1960 during which effect may be given to the new.. tariff pursuant to the waiverand during which the consequent renegotiations and consultations shall be comleted. "In outlining the reasons for the request (docmmleont L/1211) the NewZealand Government stated that the introduction of the new tariff would be carried out in two stages - the first stage this year and the second stage next year. The first stage was carried out this year in accordance with the terms of the Decision. "The second part of the operation will be introduced during the 1961 Parliamentary Session. Work is now proceeding on this stage but as stated. in document L/1211, the final draft will not be available until well into 1961 and there will not be sufficient ime to undertakenegotiations prior to its presentation to the New.Zealand Parliament. "It is necessary therefore, to request t:he extension of the period of the Decision to 31 December, 1961, and I should be pleased if you would arrange for this request to be included on the agenda for the seventeenth session." See L/1246, pages 12 and 13..
    [Show full text]
  • A/RES/1717 (XVI) (19 December 1961)
    Resolutions adopted ou the reports of the ,Second Committee 23 United Nations administrative unit located at FAO Head­ sources of development capital and assistance necessary quarters in Rome and reporting to both the Director-General to enable the less developed countries to determine for and the Secretary-General, with the costs of administration and themselves the most appropriate sources to which they operation under this resolution to be met from contributions may turn for assistance as needed. to the programme; 10. In the administration of the Programme attention should 1084th plenary meeting, be paid to: 19 December 1961. (a) Establishing adequate and orderly procedures on a world basis for meeting emergency food needs and emergencies in­ herent in chronic malnutrition (this could include the estab­ 1716 (XVI). Confirmation of the allocation of lishment of food reserves) ; Funds for the Expanded Programme of (b) Assisting in pre-school and school feeding; and Technical Assistance in 1962 (c) Implementing pilot projects, with the multilateral use of The General Assembly, food as an aid to economic and social development, particularly Noting that ~he Technical Assistance Committee has when related to labour-intensive projects and rural welfare; reviewed and approved the Expanded Programme of 11. Projects should be undertaken only in response to re­ Technical Assistance for the biennium 1961 and 1962, quests from the recipient country or countries concerned; 1. Confirms the allocation of funds authorized by 12. The administration of the proposed Programme will the Technical Assistance Committee to each of the or­ require close co-operation, particularly on development projects, between FAO and the United Nations, as well as with appro­ ganizations participating in the Expanded Programme priate United Nations agencies, and other appropriate inter­ of Technical Assistance from contributions, general re­ governmental bodies; sources and local costs assessments, as follows: 13.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER of 27 DECEMBER 1961 La Présente Ordonnance Doit Être Citée Comme Suit
    COUR INTEKNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES OBLIGATIONS FINANCIÈRES DES MEMBRES DES NATIONS UNIES (REQUÊTEPOUR AVIS CONSULTATIF) ORDONNANCE DU 27 DÉCEMBRE 1961 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) ORDER OF 27 DECEMBER 1961 La présente ordonnance doit être citée comme suit: (< Obligations financières des Membres des Ilrations Unies, Ordonnance dzt 27 décembre 1961 : C. I. J. Recueil 1961, fi. 64.1) This Order should be cited as follows: "Financial obligations of Members of the United Nations, Order of 27 December 1961: I.C.J. Reports 1961, p. 64." No de 256 1 Sales number INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 1961 1961 27 December 27 December 1961 General List: No. 49 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS (REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION) ORDER The President of the International Court of Justice, having regard to Article 66, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court ; Whereas, on 20 December 1961, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution requesting the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on the following question : "Do the expenditures authorized in General Assembly resolu- tions 1583 (XV) and 1590 (XV) of zo December 1960, 1595 (XV) of 3 April 1961, 1619 (XV) of ZI April 1961 and 1633 (XVI) of 30 October 1961 relating to the United Nations operations in the Congo undertaken in pursuance of the Security Council
    [Show full text]