DOCSLIB.ORG

Special Meeting; 1962

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Special Meeting; 1962 26. A Preliminary Report on the Norway Lobster (Nephrops norvégiens) in Icelandic Waters By A. SlGURßSSON Atvinnudeild Hàskôlans, Fiskideild, Reykjavik The Icelandic catch of Norway lobster comes from The catch the fishing areas off the south and south-west coast The Norway lobster fishery has been of commercial (see Figure 1 ). A comparison of this figure with Table 1 importance since 1958, reaching 728, 1,404, 2,081, shows that there are a few principal fishing areas, 1,490 and 2,672 metric tons in the years 1958, 1959, especially Areas 146-148 and Area 169. The Norway 1960, 1961 and 1962, respectively. The yield figure lobster fishery is allowed only in waters deeper than for 1962 includes 10 tons taken as by-catch in other 60 fathoms. fisheries. The catch per trawling hour, for all areas The following report is based on the data available combined, during the first three months of the season for the years 1960-62. It should be noted that the 1962 was smaller in 1962 than in 1960. O n the other hand, data have been brought up to date after the meeting. the catch per trawling hour in August and September vT "- 15$ 157 170, 173 174 175 176 Figure 1. The fishing areas for Norway lobster off Iceland. 143 Table 1. Icelandic catch per trawling hour of N e p h ro p s in the years 1960-1962 1960 May June July August September No. No. Kg No. Kg No. Kg No. Kg No. Kg of Area of hours per hour of hours per hour of hours per hour of hours per hour of hours per hour 1960 106 __ 4 15 __ 146 92 126 718 112 1,220 89 759 50 64 16 147 -- 163 172 121 99 ---- 148 -- 812 75 340 63 356 68 - - 152 -- 350 112 84 94 ---_ 154 ------ 10 230 __ 166 ---- 6 88 68 100 __ 168 -- 18 72 70 54 ---_ 169 -- 584 68 1,234 93 232 34 -_ 170 -- 401 80 641 70 62 20 -_ 171 ---- 32 52 45 182 - _ 173 - - 58 108 19 171 - -- - All areas, 1960 92 126 3,108 93 3,767 85 1,532 58 64 16 1961 146 __ 223 48 686 42 78 67 _ 147 --_- 64 49 __-_ 153 -----_ 3 nil — — 154 --- --- 129 61 - - 1962 104 __ _ _ 3 7 _ 106 ---- 1 1 -___ 125 -- 51 88 _--___ 126 -- 99 86 97 73 ____ 144 ---- 18 25 --__ 145 16 39 124 90 53 24 ---_ 146 1,021 110 4,920 83 4,874 62 2,414 65 __ 147 295 115 216 77 112 62 -_-_ 148 789 98 363 78 285 60 339 58 __ 152 -- 71 78 ----__ 153 48 81 62 53 -- 36 23 __ 154 48 33 86 66 292 79 114 46 69 57 164 -- 16 8 ______ 166 ---- 28 64 ____ 168 -- 67 50 48 56 131 56 __ 169 491 88 1,275 96 1,932 80 97 53 __ 170 83 68 86 64 124 88 ---- All areas, 1962 2,791 100 7.436 84 7,867 67 3,131 62 69 57 was greater in 1962 than in 1960 (see Table 1 and The data on catch per hour for 1961 are very scarce. Figure 2, which show the catch per trawling hour by However, those for Area 146 show a small catch areas and by months for the years 1960-62). Figure 2 compared with the data for the preceding and the shows that, as a rule, the catch is largest in the spring following years (Figure 2). Moreover, the catch per and decreases during the summer. landing was smaller in 1961 than in 1960 and 1962 (Table 2 and Figure 3). 144 120 Area 146 Area 169 120 00 100 6 0 6 0 40 40 20 20 Area 154 Areas 160 140 20 120 Kg. Kg. per Trawling Hour 100 80 I9 6 0 60 6 0 40 20 20 M J J A S M J J A S M J JA S Months Figure 2. Catch per trawling hour of Norway lobster (kg). I960 2000 196 1750 1962 500 ccn T3 C 250 _io Cl 750 500 250 Figure 3. Catch per landing of Norway lobster and the by-catch (kg). 145 Table 2. Total catch of Norway lobster and by-catch, and catch per landing in 1960, 1961 and 1962 (all fish gutted with head on) 1960 1961 1962 No. of landings.......................... 1,454 1,327 1,256 Total catch K g per 0 / Total catch K g per Total catch K g per 10 °/o 0 / (Kg) landing (Kg) landing (Kg) / 0 landing Norway lobster.......................... .......... 2.080,918 33-3 1,431 1.490.107 28-3 1.123 2,662,277 41-5 2,120 H addock........................................ .......... 890,724 14-2 613 1.122,830 21-4 846 1,023,744 16-0 815 C o d .................................................. ......... 1.075.936 17-2 740 718.546 13-7 541 718,247 11-2 572 W itc h ............................................. .......... 727.434 11-6 500 514.804 9-8 388 402.957 6-3 321 R ed fish .......................................... ......... 478.183 7-6 329 246.834 4-7 186 515.364 8-0 410 L i n g ............................................... ......... 317,805 5-1 219 353,129 6-7 266 486,844 7-6 388 C a tfis h ........................................... ......... 143,195 2-3 98 192,593 3-7 145 88.720 1-4 71 Lem on sole ............................................ 132,967 2-1 91 182,917 3-5 138 82,324 1-3 66 P la ic e ........................................................ 154.057 2-5 106 167,512 3-2 126 89.535 1-4 71 H a lib u t...................................................... 96,956 1-6 67 89,370 1-7 67 51,914 0-8 41 Torsk ........................................................ 6.167 0-1 4 85,254 1-6 64 2.051 0-03 2 M egrim ...................................................... 37.423 0-6 26 18,650 0-4 14 30,676 0-5 24 Coalfish .......................................... ......... 29,254 0-5 20 11.003 0-2 8 17.796 0-3 14 Common skate ..................................... 16,183 0-3 11 15,837 0-3 12 12.170 0-2 10 Other species and w aste.......... 65,081 10 45 48,334 0-9 36 229.646 3-6 183 T o ta l................................................. 6,252,283 100-0 4,300 5,257,720 100-1 3.962 6,414,265 100-0 5,107 T otal by-catch............................... 4.171,365 66-7 2,869 3,767,613 71-7 2.839 3,751,988 58-5 2,987 The length distribution ing in kg. The table also shows the percentage in the Figure 4 shows the length distributions of Norway total catch, both of Norway lobster and fish. lobster in Area 146. Only one sample is available from Figure 3 shows the catch per landing, both of this area for the year 1960 and none for the year 1961. Norway lobster and by-catch. The amount of the From the beginning of June to the end of August 1962 latter is considerable, but as licences for the lobster fourteen samples of Norway lobster were collected trawling are valid only in waters deeper than 60 from Area 146, five of which have been selected for fathoms, the by-catch consists mainly of m ature fish illustration in Figure 4, as they show the main features and therefore does not constitute any serious problem. of the changes in the length distribution for this period. All the samples are from commercial catches. Table 3. These changes are not very pronounced for the greater The percentage of the Norway lobster with carapace part of the season. In June there were fewer small length less than 37 mm, and those less than 43 mm; also individuals in the samples than were found in July, the percentage of males and females in each sample especially in the sample for 10. July (Table 3). After (Carapace length x 3-29 = total length) that the number of small individuals decreased until Percentage with the beginning of August when it began to rise, and in carapace length ?? (Jo the last days of that month it had risen so high that Date o, < 37 mm < 43 m m °/o 10 the fishery was stopped on 31. August, except off the 8. J u n e ..................... 6-3 42-5 2-7 97-3 easterly part of the south coast, where two or three 11.J un e..................... 3-8 27-9 1-3 98-7 boats were fishing in September. 21.J une..................... 2-7 22-0 1-1 98-9 The percentage of females in the samples rose and 25. Ju n e ..................... 2-0 22-4 0-3 99-7 fell with the percentage of small animals (Figure 4 3.-4. Ju ly ................ 10-7 34-3 3-5 96-5 7-J u l y ..................... 17-5 42-7 7-1 92-9 and Table 3). 10. J u l y ..................... 22-7 52-1 14-8 85-2 12. J u l y ..................... 16-2 42-8 11-8 88-2 17. J u l y ..................... 11-4 33-8 5-8 94-2 2. A ugust................ 11-4 29-7 7-4 92-6 The by-catch 13. A ugust................ 16-4 37-3 14-8 85-2 Table 2 shows the total catch of Norway lobster 20. August................ 24-8 47-9 17-7 82-3 24.-26.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N.A.A. BULLETIN August (� Ap in Three Sections 1962 � � II�U� Section 3
    N.A.A. BULLETIN August (� Ap In Three Sections 1962 � � II�U� Section 3 1.919' S Topical Index to Volume XLIII of N.A.A. BULLETIN and Special Publications Section 1 Research Reports Accounting Practice Reports SEPTEMBER 1961 THROUGH AUGUST 1962 Topical Index Accounting Background for Management - Accounting Techniques. ERIC L. KOHLER. October, 1961. Emerging Role of Mathematical Methodology in Accountancy. NORTON M. BEDFORD, CHARLES H. GRIFFIN and THOMAS H. WILLIAMS. June, 1962. Emerging Tools for Managerial Accounting. NORTON M. BEDFORD. October, 1961. Management Accountant's Opportunity in the Present Business Climate, The. WILLIAM H. FRANKLIN. October, 1961. Accounting Systems (See Systems and Procedures) Accounts Payable Accounting for Payables —A Tabulating Procedure. ELMER B. FISHER. September, 1961. Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Information for the Credit Department. JAMES D. CRAIG. July, 1962. Order Entry- Billing —Key to Standard Profit Analysis. ROBERT H. SCHWINN. July, 1962. Small Order in Large and Small Business, The. DAVID E. HENDERSON. December, 1961. Administrative Expense Control of Administrative Expenses in Banking, The. RICHARD J. POWELL. May, 1962. Management Costs Can Be Controlled. FRED R. GRANT. May, 1962. Advertising (See Distribution) Airplane Construction and Transportation EDP Control of Detail Parts in Airframe Manufacturing. CHARLES T. BARRETT. December, 1961. Effective Overhead Budgeting. KENNETH E. MCMULLEN. September, 1961. Input - Output Relationships as a Forecasting Tool. R. L. DRESSEL. June, 1962. Assets —Fixed (See also Return on Investment) Doubtful Areas in Lease Capitalization. CHARLES G. WALKER. March, 1962. Management Planning of Capital Allocations to Business Activities. JOHN V. JAMES. September, 1961. Practical Application of Present -Value Technique, A. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Libraries, July-August 1962
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Special Libraries, 1962 Special Libraries, 1960s 7-1-1962 Special Libraries, July-August 1962 Special Libraries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962 Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons, Collection Development and Management Commons, Information Literacy Commons, and the Scholarly Communication Commons Recommended Citation Special Libraries Association, "Special Libraries, July-August 1962" (1962). Special Libraries, 1962. 6. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/sla_sl_1962/6 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Libraries, 1960s at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Libraries, 1962 by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION Putting Knowledge to Work OFFICERS DIRECTORS President SARAAULL ETHELS. KLAHRE Uniz;evsity of Hou rton Federal Reserve Bank of Clevela~zd,Clel,eland, Ohio Houston 4, Texas First Vice-president and President-Elect JOANM. HUTCHINSON MRS.MILDRED H. BRODE Research Center, Diamond Alk.11; David Taylor Model Bath. W~shiu,qio~r.D. C. Comparzj, Paiwes~,ille.Ohjo Second Vice-president PAULW. RILEY ROBERTW. GIBSON,JR. College of BusI'ne.t.r Adminirfviitiu~i Thomas J. Watron Research Cet//rv. Ydmzm Bosiott College Height.r, New Yovk Che~t~utHill, Ma.r.rachuset/.r Secretary MRS.JEANNE B. NORTH MRS. ELIZABETHB. ROTH Lockheed Missi1e.r 6 Sp~crDil~isiou. P.do Alto. Stundard Oil Company of Callfor- Culiforniil niil, San Frawrisro, Cdifor~zia Treasurer EDWARDG. STRABLE RALPHH. PHELPS J. Walter Thompsorz Compnizj Ettgineering Societie.~L;brar). A-ew Yvrk, Nru York Chicago, Illinois Immediate Past-President MRS.ELIZABETH R.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED W.19/19 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 8 December 1961 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Nineteenth Session NEWLY-INDEPENDENT STATES Recommrendation of 18 November 19.30 (Note by the Executive Secretary) The Recommendation of' 18 November 1960(9S/16) provides for the de facto application of the CATT between contracting parties and territories which acquire fully autonomy in the conduct of their external commercial relations and to which the GATT wasformerly applied by the metropolitan power. The period of de facto aapplication ends two years after the date of independence. This Recommendation is at present applicaible in respect of the following States until the dates indicated: Cameroon-1 (1 January 1962) Ivory Coast (7 August 1962) Central African Repoublic (141 August 1962) Madagascar (25 June 1932) Chad (11 August 1932) Mali ( 20 June 1932) Congo (Brazzaville) (15 August 1962) Mauritania (28 November 1962) Congo (Leopoldville (50 June 1932) Niger (3 Augzust 1962) Cyprus (16 Auguust 1932) Senegal (20 June 1962) Dahomey (1 August 1)932) Togo (27 April 1962) Gabon (17 August 1932) Upper Volta (5 August 1962) The Governments of the Rei:ublic of Camersoen (L/1653) and the Republic of' Congo (Lecocidville) (L/1563) have requested an extension of the time-limit, a.s it will not be possible for them to take decisions in this matter within the two-yearperiod. Other States may also wish to have a longer period in which to decide upon their future relations with the GATT. It is therefore suggested, for consideration by the CONTRACTING PARTIES, that the Recomniendation of 18 November 1960 might be extended for one year for any State which requests an extension, In the event that the CONTRACTING PARTIES wish to actupon this suggestion the following text of a decision miht be considered: W.19/19 Page 2 DRAFTDECISION CONSIDERING that the CONTRACTING PARTIES recommended on 18 November 19(0 that contracing parties should continue to apply de factor the Ceneral Agreement in their relations with any territory which acquires full.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED L/1820 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 7 August 1962 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution Original: English AUSTRALIAN ACTION UNDER ARTICIE XIX. Notification of Restrictions on Imports of Antibio-.ics The :following communication, dated 3 Auguist 1962, has been received from the Government of Australia: "The Australian Government wishes to advise the CONTRACTING PARTIES that in accordance with the provisions of Article XIX it is imposing temporary quantitative restrictions on. the following items, 280(R) Benaylpenicillin and its salts 280(S) Phernaxymethylpencillin and its salts 280(T) Streptonyein sulphate 285(A) 1 Pharmaceutical preparations etc . of Benzylpenicillin and its salts: Phenoxymethylpenicillin and its salts: Streptomyoin sulphate: Admixtares of Streptomycin sulphate with Benzylpenicillin or its salts or with Phenoxymethyl- penicillin or its salts. "The action has been made necessary following an increase in imports. under such conditions as to cause serious injury to the domestic production of penicillins n Australia and the possibility of increased imports threatening serious damage to streptomycin production. "As delay would cause damage difficult to repair action will be taken as from 3 August 1962. The question of the local industry's normal protective needs is already unde. enquiry by the Australian Tariff Board. The present action is essentially of a holding nature pending the receipt of the Board's full report. Duties on the items concerned are not bound under the GATT. "Followirg evidence of damage to domestic industry, dumping duties were imposed in January 1961 and additional temporary duties in January 1962. This action has, however, been ineffective and there. has. been substantial increase in imports of Benzylpenicillin and Phenoxymethylpenicillin in the six months January/June 1962 compared to the six months ended December 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • September 13, 1965 Issue (Dig091365.Pdf)
    ECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION I1'W~ IDll@I1~1r brief summary of financial proposals filed with and actions by the S.EC ('n ordering full text of Releo.e. Irom Publication. Unit, cit" number) (ISBue No. 65-9-8) FOR R E LEA S E _-=S..::,e!:.pt:..:e::m::b..::,e~r....;1::.:3:..z.,--!.;19::..:6~5~__ UNEEDA VENDING OFFERING SUSPENDED. In a order under the Securities Act announced today (Release 33-4800), the SEC made permanent its August 1964 order temporarily suspending a Regulation A exemption from Securities Act registration with respect to a public offering of 73,500 shares of common stock of Uneeda Vending Service, Inc., of Brooklyn, N. Y. After a hearing, the Commission's hearing examiner submitted an initial decision in which he found that the temporary suspension order should be made permanent. No petition for review of the decision was filed although an extension was granted for its filing. Accordingly, pursuant to the said initial decision, the Commission ordered that the suspension be permanent. DORADO SECURITIES WITHDRAWAL AUTHORIZED. In a decision under the Securities Exchange Act announced today (Release 34-7703), the SEC granted a request of Dorado Securities Corporation, 350 Fifth Avenue New York, for withdrawal of its broker-dealer registration; and the Commission discontinued proceedings o~ the question whether such registration should be revoked. The proceedings were based upon the company's failure to file a report of financial condition for 1963. George Geiger and Howard S. Hammond, company officials, were named as
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Description
    Military Planning for Berlin Emergency Archival Description Military Planning for Berlin Emergency Reference Code(s): DEF 4-4-04 -> DEF 4-4-04 Title: Military Planning for Berlin Emergency Dates of creation : 1961 – 1987 Level of description : Sub-series Name of creator: EF then DEF Administrative history/Scope and content: Following the Soviet note of 27 November 19581 which challenged the status quo established by the Potsdam Agreement, the Three Western Powers (UK, US and France) decided on 4th April 1959 to set up a Planning Group, named Live Oak, to prepare plans on land and in the air which would guarantee West Berlin’s access and would help assess Soviet’s intentions. On 2nd April 1959 and 21st September 1960 respectively, the French and UK Representatives to the North Atlantic Council presented the Three Powers’ view on the measures to be taken in case of a crisis and on the need for coordination between NATO and Live Oak. The crisis of 13 August 19612 and the erection of the Berlin wall, resulted in an acceleration of NATO’s plans for Berlin Emergency and the adoption of temporary measures to strengthen the Alliance’s military machinery. On 22 September 1961, the Secretary General briefed the Council in private session on his discussions in Washington with the Tripartite Working Group and on 25 October 1961 in a Private Meeting of the Council it was decided that instructions would be given to NATO Commanders for the preparation of military plans to ensure cooperation with the Three Powers Contingency plans and allow for a closer link between LIVE OAK and NATO plans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of the Cold Winter of 1962/63 on the Helgoland Population of Branchiostoraa Ianceolatum (Pallas)
    The effects of the cold winter of 1962/63 on the Helgoland population of Branchiostoraa Ianceolatum (Pallas) WILLIAMINA A. M. COUt~TNEY and JosEPH E. WEt~B Department of Zoology, Westfield College, University of London, England KURZFASSUNG: Wie Wirkungen des kalten Winters 1962/63 auf die Helgoland-Population yon Branchiostoma lanceolatum (PALLAS). I~ber die H~l~e der Helgoi~inder Branchiostorna lanceolatum-Population starb, als die Wassertemperatur w~ihrend des strengen Winters 1962/63 unter 0° C herabsank. Dies geht aus der Analyse yon F~ingen hervor, welche mit Van Veen und Hensen Dredgen gemacht worden waren. In der jiingsten Altersgruppe der Population stieg die Sterberate auf 100°/0 an. Die Empfindlichkeit yon Individuen verschiedener GrSfe gegeniiber niedriger Temperatur wird diskutiert hinsichtlich ihres Verhaltens sowohl im Laboratorium als auch im Grobsand ihres Habitats. Untersuchungen i~ber das Aktivit~tsmuster von Vertretern der Helgoland- und der Neapel-Populationen in Abh~ingigkeit yon verschie- denen Temperaturen machen wahrscheinlich, daft B. lanceolatum eine mediterrane Art ist, welche sich nordw~irts in den Englischen Kanal und die Nordsee ausgebreitet hat. Die Tiere sind nicht in der Lage, si& bei Temperaturen unter 3° C - wie sic bei Helgoland im Winter normalerweise vorkommen - fortzubewegen. INTRODUCTION Branchiostoma Ianceolatum is found in large numbers in coarse sand deposits at several localities in the German Bight. An important and accessible ground where these animals can easily be studied lies some 3 miles to the N.E. of Helgoland. The authors are at present investigating the life history and populations of B. Ianceolatum, chiefly at Helgoland, with a view to comparison with a tropical species, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilateral Trade Negotiations the Uruguay
    MULTILATERAL TRADE RESTRICTED MTN.GNG/NG7/W/40/Rev.l NEGOTIATIONS 15 July 1988 THE URUGUAY ROUND Special Distribution Group of Negotiations on Goods (GATT) Negotiating Group on GATT Articles DE FACTO STATUS AND SUCCESSION: ARTICLE XXVI:5(c) Note by the Secretariat * Revision At the fifth meeting of the Group the secretariat was asked to provide any available information on the duration of de facto application of the GATT by countries which have subsequently succeeded to the status of contracting parties under Article XXVI:5(c). The table below lists the contracting parties which have succeeded to GATT under the provisions of Article XXVI:5(c). It also shows in each case the date on which "full autonomy in the conduct of its external relations and of the other matters provided for in this Agreement" was acquired and the date of succession as a contracting party. The legal aspects of de facto application of the General Agreement are analysed in a secretariat note of 28 June 1984 on "De Facto Application of the General Agreement" (C/130). See also MTN.GNG/NG7/W/31. Contracting Date of Date of admission Time- party de facto status by declaration/ lag certification (in months) Indonesia 27 December 1949 24 February 1950 2 Ghana 6 March 1957 17 October 1957 7 1/4 Malaysia 31 August 1957 24 October 1957 2 In the previous document, MTN.GNG/NG7/W/40, Tanzania and Hong Kong were omitted from the list of contracting parties which have succeeded to GATT under the provisions of Article XXVI:5(c).
    [Show full text]
  • The Money Market in August 1963
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK 139 sluggishnessshown in this sector during the earlier part of were about the same as in January and April and were the year. Recent Government forecasts of the volume of appreciably above the year-earlier level. Plans to buy private construction for 1963 as a whole imply little change household durables, though showing what appears to be a from present levels over the balance of the year. seasonal decline from the April level, were also higher Spending by the consumer sector, on the other hand. than a year ago. appears to have taken on new vigor in the past several Consumer purchases of cars and durables, of course, months. Thus, retail sales registered gains of better than often involve the use of consumer credit, the steady expan- 1 per cent in both June and July, and weekly data for sion of which has been one of the factors contributing to August suggest a further small increase in that month. the strength in consumer buying throughout the current While new car sales fell off in August, this may in part business upswing. Automobile credit, in particular, has have reflected a shortage of models most heavily in de- shown a marked risc, reflecting the high rate of car sales, mand as the production of 1963 models came to a close. which was perhaps partly stimulated by the continuation Department stores, in contrast, set a new sales record of the trend toward lower downpayments and longer during August, as cooler weather reportedly brought on maturities. It is noteworthy that, despite this easing in the a rush to purchase back-to-school items and fall fashions.
    [Show full text]
  • 104-10301-10000.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com 1(}/- }()'b()/- J 0000 ~·· .. ' ... -~ • TOP-SECRET JOHN A. McCONE THE SIXTH DIRECTOR OF CkN~RAL INTELLIGENCE II. .•. By Walter Elder •. Edited by Mary s. McAuliffe, DCI Staff Historian .. 1987 The attached is a draft history CL BY BYE-1 which has not be~n forwarded for DECL OADR review outside the DCI History Staff. DERIVED FROM BYE-1 WORKING DRA~T . BY NO. 018-88 99 copy d of· 2 Handle via{iY,EM Control System· C.. -,;: TOP. SECRET 1j-OOOOO CHAPTER IV In the meanwhlle, Cuba remained a sore point for both the CIA and the Kennedys. Shortly after the Bay of Pigs, President Kennedy asked General Maxwell Taylor to chair a small commission, consisting of Robert Kennedy, All~n Dulles and Admiral Arleign &urke, to investigate. Highly critical of the piecemeal and acquiescent administrative decisions which had accompaned the operation's progress, ·the Taylor report was mild in comparison w~th the severely critical internal report prepared by CIA Inspector General Lyman Kirkpatrick. Robert Kennedy also produced a personal Bay of Pigs :report to ~he President, which he discussed with McCone in late November 1961. The Attorney General was especially critical of Richard Bissell, Deputy Director for Plans, because Bissell had told the President the operation was likely to succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant's Annual Report, 1962-1963
    COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT 1962 --- 1963 The Judge Advocate General's School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia FOREWORD The Commandant's Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1963 marks the second in a series of annual records of the activities of The Judge Advocate General's School. This report, like that of the ~naugural issue published last year, has a three-fold purpose: 1. To summarize the operations of the School during the past fiscal year. z. To preserve in printed form a record of the School and its staff and faculty, students, and enlisted personneL 3. To describe the various courses of instruction offered at the School. JOHN F. T. MURRAY Colonel, JAGC Commandant COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I -The Judge Advocate General's School Today ................................................................... 1 Mission ....................................................................... 1 History ....................................................................... 3 Section II -Organization of The Judge Advocate General's School ...................................... ~.......... 4 Academic Department ............................................. 4 Nonresident Training Department ....................... 4 Plans and Publications Department ....................... 4 Office of School Secretary....................................... 6 Board of Visitors ....................................................... 6 Section III -Academic Activities ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multilateral Agreement Relating to Certificates of Airworthiness for Imported Aircraft Signed at Paris on 22 April 1960
    MULTILATERAL AGREEMENT RELATING TO CERTIFICATES OF AIRWORTHINESS FOR IMPORTED AIRCRAFT SIGNED AT PARIS ON 22 APRIL 1960 Entry into force: In accordance with Article 11, paragraph 1, the Agreement entered into force on 24 August 1961. Status: 16 parties, 17 signatories. State Date of signature Date of deposit of Effective date Instrument of ratification or adherence Austria 25 April 1960 25 July 1961 24 August 1961 Belgium 28 April 1960 6 October 1961 5 November 1961 Denmark 4 November 1960 13 September 1962 13 October 1962 Finland 22 April 1960 France 22 April 1960 29 November 1962 29 December 1962 Germany 28 March 1961 17 July 1962 16 August 1962 Greece 22 June 1961 29 March 1967 28 April 1967 Ireland 22 April 1960 14 September 1967 14 October 1967 Italy (4) 22 April 1960 19 April 1968 19 May 1968 Luxembourg 22 April 1960 22 March 1965 21 April 1965 Netherlands (1) 2 September 1960 25 September 1962 25 October 1962 Norway 21 February 1962 11 April 1962 11 May 1962 Portugal 22 April 1960 4 June 1968 4 July 1968 Spain 22 April 1960 1 August 1961 31 August 1961 Sweden (2) 22 April 1960 7 June 1960 24 August 1961 Switzerland 22 April 1960 20 September 1961 20 October 1961 United Kingdom (3) 22 April 1960 5 December 1961 4 January 1962 (1) Ratification concerned the Kingdom in Europe and the Netherlands Antilles. The Netherlands Antilles ceased to exist as an autonomous country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands with effect from 10 October 2010. By a note dated 31 August 2011, deposited on 9 September 2011, the Netherlands advised ICAO that, following a modification in the structure of the Kingdom of the Netherlands effective from 10 October 2010, this Agreement applies from 10 October 2010 to the Caribbean part of the Netherlands (the islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba), Curaçao and Sint Maarten.
    [Show full text]