THE GODFATHER Part Two Screenplay by Mario Puzo And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mustang Daily, April 2, 1975
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DigitalCommons@CalPoly Volume 39 Number 43 California Polytechnic State Unlverelty, San Lull Obispo Wednesday, April 2, 1975 Legal decision overrules SAC by FRED VULIN which Councilman T. Keith Gurnee was seeking M uiuni Daily stuff writer» have the right to re-election. endorte candidate» for public office, according to a In the Feb. 5 column Harvey wrote: legal opinion ittued by the Chancellor'» office. "Gal Poly students have an opportunity to The opinion, in effec t, nullifiet a Feb. 12 vote by show that they want a voice tn the decisions—a vote the Student Affair» Council, which called for an tyith some power—by voting for Keith Gurnee." immediate halt of such endortementi. Ronca saw the column as a violation of Title V The endowment», SAC held, were in violation and asked SAC to vote accordingly—which the of Title V (Sec. 42405) of the California Ad- legislative body did. The Ronca motion received miniitrative Code. The code prohibit» the u»e of only one dissenting vote—that of Mike Murdy of fund» of an auxiliary organization to: the School of Communicative Arts and "Support or oppo»e any i»»ue before the voter» of Humanities. thii »late or any »ubdiviiion thereof or any city, Mustang editor Marji Nieuwsma immediately munic ipality or local governmental entity of any requested the Chancellor's office to make a legal kind..." interpretation of Title V. The letter by Mayman HoweveV, Linda G. May man, an attorney work represents the official view of the California Suite ing for the Chancellor'» general counsel, informed University and Colleges on the subject. -
Recommended Reading 2010
American History 2010 Official Sponsors Ever worry that you’ve forgotten Dollar General, Dollar General Literacy everything you learned in school? Brush Foundation Wondering what to read in up with these American novels and history HarperCollins Publishers, Avon A, Harper your book club? books. Paperbacks, Harper Perennial Hyperion/Voice 1. Founding Mothers: The Women Simon & Schuster Let us help! Who Raised Our Nation by Cokie Unbridled Books Roberts $14.99 2. Moloka’i by Alan Brennert $14.99 3. The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl by Park Road Books Timothy Egan $14.95 Park Road Shopping Center 4. The Devil in the White City 4139 Park Road Murder, Magic, and Madness at the Charlotte, NC 28209 Fair that Changed America by Erik Larson $15.00 5. The River of Doubt: Theodore Roosevelt's Darkest Journey by Candice Millard $15.00 6. Impatient with Desire by Gabrielle Burton $22.99 7. Ahab's Wife: Or, The Star-Gazer by Here are 4 lists of books that would Sena Jeter Naslund $15.95 make for great discussions at your 8. The Tea Rose by Jennifer Donnelly $14.95 book club, chosen by the officers of 9. All the President's Men by Carl the Charlotte chapter of the Women’s Bernstein and Bob Woodward $7.99 National Book Association 10. Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell $15.00 11. Confederates in the Attic: The Women’s National Book Association Dispatches from the Unfinished brings together people who share an Park Road Books carries all of these Civil War by Tony Horwitz $16.00 interest in books and reading. -
The Godfather Part II Lay in Coppola ' S Eye for Detail and His Need for a Verisimilitude Transcending the Limits of Perfunctory Storytelling
A N I L L U M I N E D I L L U S I O N S E S S A Y B Y I A N C . B L O O M TT HH EE GG OO DD FF AA TT HH EE RR PP AA RR TT II II Directed by Francis Ford Coppola Produced by Francis Ford Coppola Distributed by Paramount Pictures Released in 1974 mboldened by press accounts documenting the Apocalypse Now shoot as a self - destructive E odyssey, some c ritics confronting the film for the first time in 1979 tried to undermine Francis Ford Coppola ' s monumental achievement. Though its filming was as arduous as the war itself, they faulted him, a man who had never served in uniform, for promoting Apocalypse Now as the definitive statement on Viet Nam. To this day the film retains its primal angst and resolute daring, while film critics everywhere jealously disparage the pioneering work of yet another generation. Coppola is a keen observer, a progressive th inker who learns as much from talking to others as he does consulting his cherished collection of books. His early films find their genesis in childhood experiences — his mother ' s strange departure and subsequent return to the pressures of family became The Rain People (1969); a love of musicals nourished by his father led to Finian ' s Rainbow (1968); and his Manhattan misadventures as an AWOL military school cadet fostered You ' re A Big Boy Now (1967). Similarly, the ultimate triumph of The Godfather Part II lay in Coppola ' s eye for detail and his need for a verisimilitude transcending the limits of perfunctory storytelling. -
Godfather Part II by Michael Sragow “The a List: the National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002
The Godfather and The Godfather Part II By Michael Sragow “The A List: The National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002 Reprinted by permission of the author Although Francis Ford Coppola has often been depicted president.” — and loves to depict himself — as primarily an emotion- Kay re- al and intuitive director, “The Godfather” is a film filled sponds, with correct choices, painstakingly thought out and pas- “You know sionately carried through. Part of what made it a break- how naïve through as a crime move is that it’s about gangsters who you sound? make choices too and aren’t propelled simply by blood- Senators lust and greed. They’re battling for position in New York’s and presi- Five Families, circa 1945-1946. If Don Vito Corleone dents don’t (Marlon Brando) and his successor Michael (Al Pacino) have men come off looking better than all the others, it’s because killed.” In a they play the power game the cleverest and best — and line that Marlon Brando as Don Vito Corleone. the game is sordidly exciting. marked a Courtesy Library of Congress breakthrough For all the movie’s warmth, you could never confuse the for mainstream political awareness when the film premi- Corleones or their allies and competitors for fun-loving ered in 1972, Michael wearily answers, “Who’s being ethnic types. The first scene shows the Don exacting naïve, Kay?” deadly patronage, coercing an undertaker named Bonasera into vows of love and pledges of unmitigated But when Michael says his father’s way of doing things is loyalty in exchange for a feudal bond than can’t be bro- finished, he is being naïve. -
Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's Adapted Screenplays
Absorbing the Worlds of Others: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala’s Adapted Screenplays By Laura Fryer Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of a PhD degree at De Montfort University, Leicester. Funded by Midlands 3 Cities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. June 2020 i Abstract Despite being a prolific and well-decorated adapter and screenwriter, the screenplays of Ruth Prawer Jhabvala are largely overlooked in adaptation studies. This is likely, in part, because her life and career are characterised by the paradox of being an outsider on the inside: whether that be as a European writing in and about India, as a novelist in film or as a woman in industry. The aims of this thesis are threefold: to explore the reasons behind her neglect in criticism, to uncover her contributions to the film adaptations she worked on and to draw together the fields of screenwriting and adaptation studies. Surveying both existing academic studies in film history, screenwriting and adaptation in Chapter 1 -- as well as publicity materials in Chapter 2 -- reveals that screenwriting in general is on the periphery of considerations of film authorship. In Chapter 2, I employ Sandra Gilbert’s and Susan Gubar’s notions of ‘the madwoman in the attic’ and ‘the angel in the house’ to portrayals of screenwriters, arguing that Jhabvala purposely cultivates an impression of herself as the latter -- a submissive screenwriter, of no threat to patriarchal or directorial power -- to protect herself from any negative attention as the former. However, the archival materials examined in Chapter 3 which include screenplay drafts, reveal her to have made significant contributions to problem-solving, characterisation and tone. -
NOMINEES WINNING ALL / NONE [Updated Thru 88Th Awards (2/16)]
NOMINEES WINNING ALL / NONE [Updated thru 88th Awards (2/16)] WINNING ALL [Nominees with 2 or more competitive nominations, winning all] 4 Mark Berger 2 Mark Harris 4 Glen Robinson [plus 2 Sci/Tech Awards] 2 Helen Hayes 3 James Acheson 2 Rabbi Marvin Hier 3 Cecil Beaton 2 David Hildyard 3 Randall William Cook 2 Thomas Howard 3 Jacques-Yves Cousteau 2 Sarah Kernochan 3 Vernon Dixon 2 Barbara Kopple 3 Alex Funke 2 Ring Lardner, Jr. 3 Winton Hoch [plus 1 Sci/Tech Award] 2 Vivien Leigh 3 David MacMillan 2 Andrew Lockley 3 John Meehan (Art Director) 2 Branko Lustig 3 Giorgio Moroder 2 John Mollo 3 Carlo Rambaldi 2 Marc Norman 3 Jim Rygiel 2 Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy 3 United States Navy 2 Paramount Publix Studio Sound Dept. 3 Saul Zaentz [plus 1 Thalberg Award] 2 Paramount Studio [plus 1 Sci/Tech Award] 2 Ben Affleck 2 Mario Puzo 2 Robert Amram 2 Luise Rainer 2 Manuel Arango 2 Tony Richardson 2 Richard Attenborough 2 Stephen Rosenbaum 2 Karen Baker Landers 2 Albert S. Ruddy 2 Frank Borzage 2 Denis Sanders 2 Simon Chinn 2 Gustavo Santaolalla 2 Pierre Collings 2 Tom Scott 2 Mark Coulier 2 Robert Skotak 2 Michael Douglas 2 Kenneth Smith 2 Robert Epstein 2 Kevin Spacey 2 Freddie Francis 2 John Stears 2 Roger K. Furse 2 Hilary Swank 2 Harry Gerstad 2 John Truscott 2 Sheridan Gibney 2 Marcel Vertes 2 Mel Gibson 2 Christoph Waltz 2 Benjamin Glazer 2 Paul Weatherwax 2 William Goldman 2 Russell Williams II 2 Elizabeth Haffenden 2 Peter Young WINNING NONE [Nominees with 8 or more competitive nominations, winning none] 20 Kevin O'Connell 9 Ingmar Bergman [1 Thalberg Award] 16 Greg P. -
Influence of Michael Corleone's Personalities on His Relationship
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 497 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2020) Influence of Michael Corleone’s Personalities on His Relationship With Other Characters in Trilogy of The Godfather Longhe Cao Shenzhen Middle School, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518034, China *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Analyzing the personalities and relationship of the characters is an effective method for both the professionals and the ordinary audience to comprehend movies. By discovering and explaining how Michael Corleone in The Godfather influences his relationship with other characters, this dissertation is aimed at assisting readers to fully comprehend the essence of movies in detail. This paper utilizes the method which extracts a variety of conflicts and major transitions between Michael and other characters to reflect how Michael’s personalities work on these relationships. Based on the facts in the movie, Michael demonstrates different attitudes to his family members and the outsiders of his family. It will be helpful for the audience if there are researches which can deeply analyze a more well-rounded image of Michael’s Corleone, besides analyzing his relationship and personalities appears in the future. This paper finally concludes that Michael’s personalities cause him to have completely different relationships with two types of character, as the family members and the outsiders. Keywords: Personalities, relationship, influence, gangster, Godfather 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OVERVIEW OF MICHAEL CORLEONE’S PERSONALITIES The Godfather, as a classic and representative Italian gangster movie, reflects the conflicts between Corleone Overall, Michael has two types of personalities, including family and other forces in United States as well as the stable personalities and the variational personalities. -
2. the Godfather Returns.Pdf
The Godfather Returns Mark Winegardner alla mia famiglia "Whoever forsakes the old way for the new knows what he is losing, but not what he will find. " Sicilian proverb "They were killing my friends." AUDIE MURPHY, most decorated U.S. soldier of World War II, when asked how he had found the courage to fight an entire German infantry company *The Godfather II also covers the early life of Vito Corleone (1910-1939) in flashback scenes. **The second half of The Godfather Returns also covers the early life of Michael Corleone (1920-1945) in flashback scenes. THE CORLEONE FAMILY Vito Corleone, the first godfather of New York's most powerful crime family Carmela Corleone, Vito Corleone's wife and mother of their four children Sonny Corleone, Vito and Carmela Corleone's oldest son Sandra Corleone, Sonny's wife, now living in Florida Francesca, Kathy, Frankie, and Chip Corleone, Sonny and Sandra Corleone's children Tom Hagen, consigliere and unofficially adopted son Theresa Hagen, Tom's wife and mother of their three children Andrew, Frank, and Gianna Frederico "Fredo" Corleone, Vito and Carmela's second-born son (underboss 1955-1959) Deanna Dunn, Oscar-winning actress and Fredo's wife Michael Corleone, Vito's youngest son and the reigning Don of the Corleone Family Kay Adams Corleone, Michael's second wife Anthony and Mary Corleone, children of Michael and Kay Corleone Connie Corleone, Vito and Carmela's daughter Carlo Rizzi, Connie Corleone's deceased husband Ed Federici, Connie Corleone's second husband THE CORLEONE FAMILY ORGANIZATION Cosimo "Momo the Roach" Barone, soldato under Geraci and nephew of Sally Tessio Pete Clemenza, caporegime Fausto Dominick "Nick" Geraci, Jr. -
Diplomarbeit
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „The Italianness of The Godfather – Die Darstellung von italienischer Ethnizität und Kultur in The Godfather und The Godfather – Part II“ Verfasserin: Barbara Wallner angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. Phil) Wien, 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 317 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Diplomstudium Theater-, Film- und Medienwissenschaft UniStG Betreuer: Mag. Dr. Claus Tieber Danksagung Ich möchte meinem Betreuer Mag. Dr. Claus Tieber für sein fachliches und persönliches Interesse an dieser Arbeit herzlich danken. Mein Dank gilt außerdem Dr. Ulrike Kerschbaum, die diese Arbeit sicher durch den Dschungel der neuen Rechtschreibung geführt hat. Danke schließlich auch meinen Eltern, insbesondere meiner Mutter, sowie allen anderen, die mich in den letzten Monaten ertragen mussten und immer noch mit mir sprechen. Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Einleitung ..................................................................................................................... 1 1. Eine kleine Geschichte des Gangsterfilms ................................................................... 4 1.1. THE GODFATHER – der Gangsterfilm schlechthin ..................................................................... 11 2. „A Natural Inclination Towards Criminality“ – Die Stereotypisierung der Italo-Amerikaner ............................................................... 18 2.1. Ein Volk von Al Capones? -
The Godfather Study Guide
OSCAR WINNER 1972: Best Picture Best Actor Best Adapted Screenplay TEACHERS’ NOTES This study guide is aimed at students of GCSE Media Studies, A’Level Film Studies and GNVO Media: Communication and Production (Intermediate and Advanced). Specific areas of study covered by the guide are those of genre, representation and the issue of violence in film. The Godfather: Certificate 18. Running Time 175 minutes. MAJOR CREDITS FOR THE GODFATHER The Godfather 1972 (Paramount) Producer: Albert S. Ruddy Director: Francis Coppola Screenplay: Mario Puzo, Francis Coppola Director of Photography: Gordon Willis Editors: William Reynolds, Peter Zinner Music: Nino Rota Art Director: Dean Tavoularis Cast: Marion Brando Al Pacino James Caan Richard Conte Robert Duvall Sterling Hayden Oscars 1972: Best Picture Best Actor (Marion Brando) Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar Nominations 1972: Best Director Best Supporting Actor (James Caan, Robert Duvall, Al Pacino) Best Music [later declared incligiblel Best Costume Design Best Editing Best Sound © Film Education 1 THE GODFATHER Coppola’s The Godfather was the direct descendant of dozens of gangster movies made with stars like Cagney and Edward C. Robinson. But there was a vital difference. Its examination of the Corleone family had a consistently human dimension that made the evil of the Mafia, who loved it for the wrong reasons, all the more horrendous. As a study of evil, it was all the better for assuming that such darkness emanated not from dyed-in-thewool villains but out of some of the family values we now most cherish. Added to that, of course, was the brilliance of its making, with Gordon Willis’ photography and Nino Rota’s score adding to Coppola’s fine orchestration of a terrific cast. -
The Reflection of Successful American Dream Through the Character of Michael Corleone in Mark Winegardner’S the Godfather Returns
THE REFLECTION OF SUCCESSFUL AMERICAN DREAM THROUGH THE CHARACTER OF MICHAEL CORLEONE IN MARK WINEGARDNER’S THE GODFATHER RETURNS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By DODI ROSYID SAPUTRA Student Number: 034214064 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2008 THE REFLECTION OF SUCCESSFUL AMERICAN DREAM THROUGH THE CHARACTER OF MICHAEL CORLEONE IN MARK WINEGARDNER’S THE GODFATHER RETURNS AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By DODI ROSYID SAPUTRA Student Number: 034214064 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2008 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first and greatest gratitude goes to Allah SWT who has given me life, power, guidance and everything so I can stand still till this second and by his blessing and guidance I can finish my study and my thesis. This thesis is dedicated to my beloved mother and father who always pray for my success, encourage me and support me emotionally, spiritually, and financially. My gratitude also goes to my advisor Paulus Sarwoto, S.S., M.A. who has given me big help and support during the writing of my thesis. I would like to thank to J. Harris Hermansyah S., S.S., M.Hum. and Ni Luh Putu Rosiandani, S.S., M.Hum. for the critical corrections and suggestions. My warmest thanks go to my older sister Debie and my best friend Budi. Thanks to Mbak Debie for accompanying and supporting me during my hard time in writing this thesis and to Budi for the support and our friendship. -
Play Ball! Sports As Paradigms of Masucline Performance In
PLAY BALL! SPORTS AS PARADIGMS OF MASUCLINE PERFORMANCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY UNITED STATES by GEOFFREY AARON DOUGLAS (Under the Direction of DAVID SALTZ) ABSTRACT This study examines the culture of baseball and football as paradigms for masculine performativity. The goal is to establish a new way to examine the construction of masculine behavior in United State popular culture. After establishing how both baseball and football present distinct performative images of masculinity, a materialist reading of plays and films representing both sports will reveal how images of gender identity extend into the United States’ popular culture. INDEX WORDS: Gender, Masculinity, Performative Acts, Baseball, Football, Western, Film, Drama, Theatre, Babe Ruth, Grantland Rice, Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne, Walter Camp PLAY BALL! SPORTS AS PARADIGMS OF MASUCLINE PERFORMANCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY UNITED STATES by GEOFFREY AARON DOUGLAS BA, SAMFORD UNIVERSITY, 2006 MA, TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, 2011 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2017 © 2017 GEOFFREY AARON DOUGLAS All Rights Reserved PLAY BALL! SPORTS AS PARADIGMS OF MASUCLINE PERFORMANCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY UNITED STATES by GEOFFREY AARON DOUGLAS Major Professor: David Saltz Committee: John Bray Jepkorir Rose Chepyator-Thompson Christopher Sieving Electronic Version Approved: Suzanne Barbour Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2017 iv DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my parents, who encourage me to love an accept everyone. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are too many people, without whose support and expertise this study would not exist, to list.