Rosebay Rhododendron Rhododendron Maximum
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province
Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, and North Carolina, NAPPC South Carolina, Tennessee Table of CONTENTS Why Support Pollinators? 4 Getting Started 5 Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest 6 Meet the Pollinators 8 Plant Traits 10 Developing Plantings 12 Far ms 13 Public Lands 14 Home Landscapes 15 Bloom Periods 16 Plants That Attract Pollinators 18 Habitat Hints 20 This is one of several guides for Check list 22 different regions in the United States. We welcome your feedback to assist us in making the future Resources and Feedback 23 guides useful. Please contact us at [email protected] Cover: silver spotted skipper courtesy www.dangphoto.net 2 Selecting Plants for Pollinators Selecting Plants for Pollinators A Regional Guide for Farmers, Land Managers, and Gardeners In the Ecological Region of the Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest Coniferous Forest Meadow Province Including the states of: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia And parts of: Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee a nappc and Pollinator Partnership™ Publication This guide was funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the C.S. Fund, the Plant Conservation Alliance, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management with oversight by the Pollinator Partnership™ (www.pollinator.org), in support of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC–www.nappc.org). Central Appalachian Broadleaf Forest – Coniferous Forest – Meadow Province 3 Why support pollinators? In theIr 1996 book, the Forgotten PollInators, Buchmann and Nabhan estimated that animal pollinators are needed for the reproduction “ Farming feeds of 90% of flowering plants and one third of human food crops. -
Mountain Laurel Or Rhododendron? Recreation Area Vol
U.S. Dept. of the Interior National Park Service . Spanning the Gap The newsletter of Delaware Water Gap National Mountain Laurel or Rhododendron? Recreation Area Vol. 7 No. 2 Summer 1984 These two members of the plant kingdom are often confused. Especially before they blossom, they resemble each other with their bushy appearance and long, dark-green leaves. Both plants ARE shrubs, and they are often seen growing together. Another thing they have in common: although some species have not been proven dangerous, it is well to consider ALL members of the laurel- (Above) Rhodendron. rhododendron-azalea group of plants as potentially toxic. The rhododendron (rhododenron maximum) is undoubtedly the most conspicuous understory plant in the mountain forests of Pennsylvania. In ravines and hollows and along shaded watercourses it often grows so luxuriantly as to form almost impenetrable tangles. In June or early July, large clusters of showy blossoms, ranging from white to light rosy- pink, appear at the ends of the branchlets. People travel many miles to witness the magnificent show which is provided by the rhododendron at flowering time. In the southern Appalachians the plant grows much larger than it ordinarily does in this area, often becoming a tree 25 feet or more in height. The dense thickets of rhododendron in the stream valleys and on the lower slopes of our mountains are favorite yarding grounds for deer when the Rhodendron. snows become deep in the wintertime. The dark- green, leathery leaves react to subfreezing temperatures by bending downward and rolling into a tight coil. Although the shrub is often browsed to excess, it has little or no nutritional value. -
Native Trees of Georgia
1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W. -
Native Plants for Conservation, Restoration & Landscaping
ABOUT THE NATIVE PLANTS FOR CONSERVATION, WHAT ARE NATIVES? For more information, refer to field guides and publications RESTORATION AND LANDSCAPING PROJECT Native species evolved within specific regions and dispersed on local natural history for color, shape, height, bloom times This project is a collaboration between the Virginia Depart- throughout their range without known human involvement. and specific wildlife value of the plants that grow in your ment of Conservation and Recreation and the Virginia Native They form the primary component of the living landscape region. Visit a nearby park, natural area preserve, forest or Plant Society. VNPS chapters across the state helped to fund and provide food and shelter for wildlife management area to learn about common plant the 2011 update to this brochure. native animal species. Native associations, spatial groupings and habitat conditions. For The following partners have provided valuable assistance plants co-evolved with specific recommendations and advice about project design, throughout the life of this project: native animals over many consult a landscape or garden design specialist with thousands to millions of experience in native plants. TheNatureConservancy–VirginiaChapter•Virginia years and have formed TechDepartmentofHorticulture•VirginiaDepartmentof complex and interdependent WHAT ARE NON-NATIVE PLANTS? AgricultureandConsumerServices•VirginiaDepartment relationships. Our native Sometimes referred to as “exotic,” “alien,” or “non- of Environmental Quality, Coastal Zone Management fauna depend on native indigenous,” non-native plants are species introduced, Program•VirginiaDepartmentofForestry•Virginia flora to provide food and DepartmentofGameandInlandFisheries•Virginia Native intentionally or accidentally, into a new region by cover. -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
RHODODENDRON STATE PARK Soils, It Can Spread to Surrounding Upland Areas
DIRECTIONS GIANT RHODODENDRON NH Natural Heritage Bureau From Rte. 119 between Fitzwilliam and Richmond, Giant rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum), take Rhododendron Rd and follow signs to the park. also known as great laurel or rosebay, is a large ev- Visiting New Hampshire’s Biodiversity ergreen shrub known for its showy flower displays. It is near the northern limit of its range in New Rhododendron Hampshire and native populations are rare. In fact, it is considered rare or uncommon throughout New State Park England. It is really a species of the southern and central Appalachians, where it is common on wooded mountain slopes, often forming dense and extensive colonies. Giant rhododendron prefers moist acidic soils that are high in organic matter, like those found in ever- green swamps. However, once established in moist RHODODENDRON STATE PARK soils, it can spread to surrounding upland areas. In addition to producing seed, rhododendron can This 2,723-acre park located in southwestern NH is spread vegetatively through a process called named after its focal point, a 16-acre grove of giant “layering,” where low growing branches that make rhododendron. A universally accessible trail encir- contact with the soil can take root, establishing new cles the grove allowing visitors to observe the plants stems and expanding the colony. close up. Mid-July is the best time to see blooms. The fragrant clusters of the giant rhododendron’s PARK USE GUIDELINES pink and white blossoms burst into bloom in mid- This park is open to the public for recreation and July and often last for a few weeks. -
Rhododendron Glenn Dale Hybrid Azaleas
U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction Rhododendron Glenn Dale Hybrid Azaleas Nothing says spring like azaleas! One of the National Arboretum’s most popular plantings, the Glenn Dale Azaleas draw thousands for annual spring viewing. Horticulturist Benjamin Y. Mor- rison worked for over 25 years to create this superior group of winter-hardy azaleas with large, colorful flowers suitable for the Washington, DC region. We present a small vignette of the 454 named introductions to entice you to grow these lovely spring treasures. Check our on-line photo gallery and be sure to make an April visit to the Arboretum part of your tradition too! The south face of Mt. Hamilton at the National Arboretum in Washington, DC was planted with approximately 15,000 azaleas from Glenn Dale in 1946-47. In 1949, the Arboretum opened to the public for the first time during the azalea bloom. U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3501 New York Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20002 Glenn Dale Hybrid Azaleas Botanical Name: Rhododendron Glenn Dale hybrids Plants in the Glenn Dale azalea breeding program were initially assigned Bell or "B" numbers an old name for the Plant Introduction Station at Glenn Dale, MD. Plant Introduction (PI) numbers were assigned later. The first “B” number was assigned to ‘Dimity’ in 1937. and ‘Satrap’ received the last “ B” number in 1951 and PI number in 1952. Family Ericaceae Hardiness: U.S.D.A. Zones 6b-8 (some hardy to Zone 5) Development: In the late 1920’s B.Y. -
Two New Species of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) from Guizhou, China
Two New Species of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) from Guizhou, China Xiang Chen South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; and Institute of Biology, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, 550009, Guiyang, People’s Republic of China. [email protected] Jia-Yong Huang Research Division, Management Committee for Baili Rhododendron Scenic Spot of Guizhou, 551500, Qianxi, People’s Republic of China Laurie Consaul Research Division, Botany, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada. [email protected] Xun Chen Guizhou Academy of Sciences, 550001, Guiyang, People’s Republic of China. Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT . Two new species, Rhododendron huang- 2005; Fang et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2006) and pingense Xiang Chen & Jia Y. Huang and R. lilacinum hundreds of similar herbarium specimens, we de- Xiang Chen & X. Chen (Ericaceae), from Guizhou scribe two previously undescribed species here. Province, China, are described and illustrated. Rhododendron huangpingense is close to the morpho- 1. Rhododendron huangpingense Xiang Chen & logically similar species R. oreodoxa Franch. var. Jia Y. Huang, sp. nov. TYPE: China. Guizhou: adenostylosum Fang & W. K. Hu and the sympatric Baili Rhododendron Nature Reserve, Pudi, species R. decorum Franch., from which it differs by 27u149N, 105u519E, 1719 m, 22 Apr. 2008, having short yellowish brown hairs on the leaves, the Xiang Chen 08024 (holotype, HGAS; isotype, rachis 15–18 mm long, a rose-colored corolla with MO). Figure 1. deep rose flecks, and the stigma ca. -
Introduction to the Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan
SOUTHERN BLUE RIDGE ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN Summary and Implementation Document March 2000 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY and the SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN FOREST COALITION Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan Summary and Implementation Document Citation: The Nature Conservancy and Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition. 2000. Southern Blue Ridge Ecoregional Conservation Plan: Summary and Implementation Document. The Nature Conservancy: Durham, North Carolina. This document was produced in partnership by the following three conservation organizations: The Nature Conservancy is a nonprofit conservation organization with the mission to preserve plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. The Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition is a nonprofit organization that works to preserve, protect, and pass on the irreplaceable heritage of the region’s National Forests and mountain landscapes. The Association for Biodiversity Information is an organization dedicated to providing information for protecting the diversity of life on Earth. ABI is an independent nonprofit organization created in collaboration with the Network of Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation Data Centers and The Nature Conservancy, and is a leading source of reliable information on species and ecosystems for use in conservation and land use planning. Photocredits: Robert D. Sutter, The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This first iteration of an ecoregional plan for the Southern Blue Ridge is a compendium of hypotheses on how to conserve species nearest extinction, rare and common natural communities and the rich and diverse biodiversity in the ecoregion. The plan identifies a portfolio of sites that is a vision for conservation action, enabling practitioners to set priorities among sites and develop site-specific and multi-site conservation strategies. -
Plant Propagation Protocol for Rhododendron Lapponicum ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL
Plant Propagation Protocol for Rhododendron lapponicum ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/RHLA2.pdf Source: (Left to Right - Lindman, 1926, Douglas, 1999, and Hedegaard, 1980)10, 12, 16 TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Ericaceae20 Common Name Heath family20, Crowberry family14 Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Rhododendron lapponicum (L.) Wahlenb.20 Varieties The USDA Plants database includes the following varieties as Rhododendron lapponicum’s subordinate taxa. Rhododendron lapponicum (L.) Wahlenb. var. lapponicum Rhododendron lapponicum (L.) Wahlenb. var. parvifolium (M.F. Adams) Herder20 Sub-species None17, 19, 20 Cultivar None17, 19, 20 Common Synonym(s) Azalea ferruginosa Pall. Azalea lapponica L. Azalea parvifolia (Adams) Kuntze Rhododendron confertissimum Nakai Rhododendron lapponicum subsp. Parvifolium (Adams) T. Yamaz. Rhododendron palustre Turcz. Rhododendron parviflorum F. Schmidt Rhododendron parvifolium Adams Rhododendron parvifolium subsp. Confertissimum (Nakai) A.P. Khokhr.17, 19 Common Name(s) Lapland rosebay20 Species Code (as per USDA RHLA220 Plants database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range R. lapponicum’s circum-polar range includes North America’s Alaska, Canada, and Greenland, Europe’s Scandinavia and Russia, and Siberia and Northern Japan in Asia.1, 7, 11 Source: (USDA, 2018)20 Source: (Central Yukon Species Inventory Project, 2018)4 Ecological distribution R. lapponicum is found in the arctic tundra and is a circumpolar species that prefers limestone-rich clay, moss, and peat or igneous and serpentine soil types.5, 6, 8 Climate and elevation range R. lapponicum prefers cold arctic conditions and alpine elevations up to 6,000 feet.6, 8 Local habitat and abundance Because R. lapponicum is circum-polar, it is found in a variety of habitats and therefore does not have any commonly associated species.1, 6, 8, 11 Plant strategy type / successional R. -
Rhododendrons International the Online Journal of the World’S Rhododendron Organizations
Rhododendrons International The Online Journal of the World’s Rhododendron Organizations V i s re n y ro as d en od Rhod Azaleas Volume 2, 2018. Part 2 - Rhododendron Articles of Broad Interest Rhododendrons International 1 Contents ii From the Editor, GLEN JAMIESON 1 Part 1. Rhododendron Organisations in Countries with American Rhododendron Society Chapters 1 Canadian Rhododendron Societies, GLEN JAMIESON AND NICK YARMOSHUK 41 Danish Rhododendron Society, JENS HOLGER HANSEN 45 Rhododendron Society in Finland, KRISTIAN THEQVIST 57 Rhododendrons in the Sikkimese Himalayas, and the J.D. Hooker Chapter, KESHAB PRADHAN 73 Rhododendrons in The Netherlands and Belgium, HENRI SPEELMAN 86 Rhododendron Species Conservation Group, United Kingdom, JOHN M. HAMMOND 95 The Scottish Rhododendron Society, JOHN M. HAMMOND 102 Part 2. Rhododendron Articles of Broad Interest 102 Maintaining a National Collection of Vireya Rhododendrons, LOUISE GALLOWAY AND TONY CONLON 116 Notes from the International Rhododendron Register 2016, ALAN LESLIE 122 A Project to Develop an ex situ Conservation Plan for Rhododendron Species in New Zealand Collections, MARION MACKAY 128 A Summary of Twenty Years in the Field Searching for Wild Rhododendrons, STEVE HOOTMAN 138 Vireyas from West and East: Distribution and Conservation of Rhododendron section Schistanthe, MARION MACKAY JOURNAL CONTACTS Journal Editor: Glen Jamieson, Ph.D. Issue Layout: Sonja Nelson Journal Technical Reviewers: Gillian Brown, Steve Hootman, Hartwig Schepker, Barbara Stump. Comments on any aspect of this new journal and future articles for consideration should be submitted in digital form to: Dr. Glen Jamieson [email protected] Please put “Rhododendrons International” in the subject line. i From the Editor Dr. -
Rhododendron Update 2 Ver4 290814
Rhododendron Update - 2 INTRODUCTION This is the second part of our Rhododendron species update and contains 14 species. Our methods are described in the previous newsletter but basically we had a six-step process. 1. We extracted all “accepted” names of Rhododendron that were not synonyms from “The Plant List”, an online working list of all known plant species, produced by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and the Missouri Botanical Garden.1 2. We then removed species that were on the ICON2 list of Rhododendrons whose seed can be legally imported into Australia. 3. We then removed species that Simon Begg had already determined were not on the ICON list and that await submissions to be prepared for their inclusion on the ICON list. These species are mostly from Argent (2006) and Cox and Cox (1997). 4. This left approximately 70 ‘missed’ Rhododendrons i.e. species not yet permitted for import and not on Simon’s list of species awaiting submissions to ICON, mostly species described since 1997. 5. These missed species were then cross-checked in two other on-line databases – The International Plant Names Index (IPNI)3 and Tropicos4. 6. We then consulted The Red List of Rhododendrons (Gibbs et al. 2011) for their conservation status and checked other databases, Rhododendron society websites and primary scientific literature to discover more about each species. 1 http://www.theplantlist.org. The List combines multiple checklist data sets held by these institutions and others and provides the accepted Latin name for most species, and synonyms by which that species has been known.