JEFFREY C. MILLER and JAN E. CRONHARDT Abstract Resume

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JEFFREY C. MILLER and JAN E. CRONHARDT Abstract Resume LIFE HISTORY AND SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE WESTERN WINTER MOTH, OPEROPHTERA OCCIDENTALIS (LEPIDOPTERA: GEOMETRIDAE), IN WESTERN OREGON' JEFFREYC. MILLERand JANE. CRONHARDT Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Abstract Can. Ent. 114: 62%636 (1982) In western Oregon, Operophtera occidentalis (Hulst) has four larval instars, is univoltine, and polyphagous. Adult activity peaked in early December, eggs overwintered, larvae were present from March to June, and pupae from May to December. Temperature thresholds for egg and larval development were estimated to be 2°C. Few species of natural enemies were observed and rates of parasitism averaged 2%. Resume Dans l'ouest de I'Oregon, Operophtera occidentalis (Hulst) passe par 4 stades larvaires, est univoltine et polyphage. L'activitk des adultes est passke par un sommet t6t en dicembre, les oeufs ont hivernk, les larves ont it6 observkes de mars a juin et les chrysalides de mai a dicembre. Les seuils themiques pour le dCveloppement de l'oeuf et le dCveloppement larvaire ont it6 estimis 2 2OC. Peu d'espkces d'ennemis naturels ont Ctk observies et les incidences de parasitisme Ctaient de 2% en moyenne Introduction The genus Operophtera has four species in northwestern North America, three of which are native to North America. The western winter moth, 0. occidentalis (Hulst), and Danby's winter moth, 0. danbyi (Hulst), appear to be endemic to the Pacific Northwest while the Bruce spanworm, 0. bruceata (Hulst), has a northern distribution throughout the Nearctic region. The European winter moth, 0. brurnata (L.), is presumed to have been introduced from Europe into Nova Scotia prior to 1949 (Smith 1950) and is presumed to have occurred in British Columbia before 1972 (Gillespie et al. 1978) and in Oregon as early as 1958 (Ferguson 1978). Studies on 0. bruceata and 0. brumata have been conducted in North America by Brown (1962), Cuming (1961), Eidt and Embree (1968), Eidt et al. (1966), Embree (1966, 1967, 1970, 1971), Gillespie and Finlayson (1981), MacPhee (1967), and Sanford and Herbert (1966). These studies document a general life history as follows: mated, brachypterous females are active in the winter and deposit eggs which overwinter on the trunk and branches of deciduous trees; larvae emerge in the spring and feed on blossoms and foliage through four (0. bruceata) or five (0. brumata) instars; pupae occur in the soil through summer and early fall and adults emerge in late fall and early winter. Few native natural enemies of Operophtera have been found in North America. The biology of 0. occidentalis has not been documented as well as its congeners. A review of the literature on the biology of 0. occidentalis indicated only that adults occur in the late fall and early winter, and that larvae feed on leaves of various deciduous trees and shrubs (McFarland 1963; Sugden 1966; Tietz 1972; Furniss and Carolin 1977). A reference to 0. occidentalis larvae occurring on conifers and adults occurring in April does not conform to the general ecological characteristics of other Nearctic Operophtera (see Prentice 1963). These data suggest that additional research is needed and that the native 0. occidentalis and the exotic 0. brumata (which are presently sympatric in parts of Oregon) may be similar in 'Technical paper No. 5978. the Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. 630 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST July 1982 the ecology of their development. The degree of similarity in the ecology of Operophtera species is of importance as it affects the feasibility of biological control of 0. brumata in Oregon. This paper reports the life history and seasonal devel- opment of 0.occidentalis in western Oregon. Methods Field. The life history of 0. occidentalis was investigated in western Oregon from the fall of 1979 through the spring of 1981. Principal field sites were in MacDonald Forest, 9.6 km northwest of Corvallis, Benton County, and in West Salem, 59 km distant in Polk County. The MacDonald Forest site (ca. 17,000 ha) was a mixed coniferous forest dominated by Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, with a mixture of deciduous trees, primarily oak, Quercus garryana Dougl.; maple, Acer macrophyllum Pursh; ash, Fraxinus latifolia Benth.; alder, Alnus rubra Bong.; hazel, Corylus cornuta Marsh var. californica (A.DC.) Sharp; and cherry, Prunus emarginata (Doug.) Walp. The Salem site was a commercial sweet cherry orchard (ca. 10 ha) with an adjacent stand (ca. 3 ha) of mixed deciduous trees primarily maple, oak, and hazel. Adults were collected with nets, beating sheets, emergence net traps (see Briggs 1957), and sticky band traps. Eggs and larvae were collected by clipping selected foliage and twigs in the field for evaluation in the laboratory. Also, a beating sheet and sweep net were used to collect larvae. Pupae were collected by sifting soil from 0.5 d trays which were placed in the field. Adult development was monitored between October and January with 30 sticky band traps twice a week in 1979 and 81 traps once a week in 1980. Larval development was monitored by collecting (at the Salem site) 80 leaf clusters twice a week from the same set of 10 trees through the spring of 1980. Also, 80 leaf clusters were collected twice a week from a single tree chosen at random. Through the spring of 1981, 175 leaf clusters were collected once a week from the same set of five trees. Larval development was also observed outside of the Salem site. Leaf clusters from a variety of plant species were collected for in field and laboratory evaluation. Laboratory. A culture of 0. occidentalis was started in the fall of 1979 and maintained for three generations. Field-collected adults were observed and reared under conditions of 4-6"C, 12L:12D photoperiod. Field-collected eggs and larvae were reared separately at 16"C, 14L: 10D photoperiod, and 70-85% relative humidity. Parasitoids reared from these larvae were preserved and moths were added to the laboratory culture. Adults used for laboratory observations on longevity and fecundity were obtained from larvae collected in the field during the previous generation, or from adults collected directly from the field. The developmental requirements of the eggs and larvae of 0. occidentalis were investigated under constant temperatures of 4", lo0, 16", 22", 28", and 34°C. Relative humidity ranged between 70% and 85% and the photoperiod was 14L:lOD. Eggs and larvae used in this study were F, progeny of field-collected adults. A total of 231 eggs were held at 4"-6'C for 3 months and then placed individually in one of the six constant temperature cabinets. At least 3 1 eggs were used in each temperature treatment. Eggs were observed at 12 h intervals until hatch or death due to desic- cation, which was indicated by collapse. A total of 192 larvae were placed indi- vidually in one of the six temperature cabinets. At least 29 larvae were placed in each cabinet except the 34°C cabinet which had only 19. The larvae were fed fresh, Volume 114 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 63 1 young cherry leaves as a standard diet and observed at 12 h intervals until death or pupation. Climatological data for field studies were obtained for the Salem airport from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Results and Discussion Sampling techniques. The technique most productive for collecting both male and female moths was sticky bands around tree trunks about m from the ground. However, specimens were damaged and not suitable for behavioral studies. Males for behavioral studies were captured with an aerial net just after dusk and females by beating tree branches over drop cloths. The stationary net trap described by Briggs (1957) did not capture as many females as did the other techniques. Eggs and larvae of all age classes were most easily collected by clipping branches from trees and inspecting blossom/leaf clusters in the laboratory. Middle and late instar larvae could be located easily by searching for foldedltied leaves. The technique of beating branches was more satisfactory for collecting late instar than early instar larvae. Pupae were difficult to locate in the field. The sifting of "native" soil and the placement/analysis of soil filled trays were too time-consuming and the recovery of specimens negligible. Life history. In western Oregon, 0.occidentalis is univoltine (Fig. 1). A major portion of the development time, 9 of 12 months, was spent either in the overwin- tering egg or oversummering pupal stage. Larval stages and active adults each occurred over a period of 8 weeks during the spring and late fall - early winter, respectively. Adults were most active between dusk and midnight. Prior to darkness, adults were found at the soil surface beneath leaf litter. Approximately '12-1 h after sunset, males would begin to fly and would remain active for a 6-h period. When temper- atures were below freezing, males would not fly but did ascend trees and could locate females. Also, the brachypterous females would ascend trees at dusk and presumably return to the ground litter. No females were collected from the tree canopy during daylight hours. Males and females in copulo were observed on tree trunks and branches from ground level to 2 m above ground between dusk and midnight. I -Adults Eggs Larvae I Larvae II: P -Larvae JK -Larvae IP Pupae 1'~~1~~.1,~b1~1,1,~,1,~#1*#11I~~+- Oct. Dec. Feb. April June-Sept. FIG. 1. The seasonal distribution of Operophtera occidenzalis. Salem, Oregon, 1979-1981. 632 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOI.OGIS7 July 1982 Field-collected adults and adults from laboratory cultures were observed to document longevity and reproductive potential. Males from laboratory cultures were kept alive for an average of 9.4 days (n = 9, S.D.
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance
    Page 1 of 44 DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 99.245.208.197 on 09/06/16 1 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. Page 2 of 44 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa. Because of their importance as pests and disease vectors impacting global agriculture and forestry, DNA barcode results on these arthropods have significant implications for quarantine detection, regulation, and management.
    [Show full text]
  • HANNAH J. BROADLEY, Phd Postdoctoral Research Associate 43 Bayshore Drive, Mashpee MA 02649 [email protected], 585-406-0197 Hannahbroadley.Com
    HANNAH J. BROADLEY, PhD Postdoctoral Research Associate 43 Bayshore Drive, Mashpee MA 02649 [email protected], 585-406-0197 hannahbroadley.com EDUCATION Ph.D. Organismic and Evolutionary Biology 2018 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA Dissertation: Impact of native natural enemies on populations of the invasive winter moth (Operophtera brumata L) in the northeast United States Advisor: Dr. Joseph S. Elkinton, Department of Environmental Conservation M.S. Organismic and Evolutionary Biology 2016 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA B.S. Environmental Studies, Cum Laude 2010 Bates College, Lewiston, ME CURRENT APPOINTMENT Postdoctoral Research Associate 2018- Present Cooperative agreement Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts & USDA APHIS, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Science and Technology, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts My current projects include: • Studying the general ecology and biology of a host-specific, parasitic wasp of the invasive insect Spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) • Developing research to determine the distribution and natural enemy complex of the Roseau cane scale (Nipponaclerda biwakoensis) HONORS AND AWARDS Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster Prevention Program (Farm Bill), FY2019 $97,873.00 Title: Determining the distribution and natural enemy complex of the Roseau Cane Scale in Asia 1st Place, Gerald N. Lanier Student Forum, Northeast Forest Pest Council, 2018 $225.00 Society of Invertebrate Pathology, Virus Division Travel Award, 2017 $750.00 Irwin Martin Award, Research in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 2017 $2500.00 Natural History Collections Summer Scholarship, 2017 $3500.00 NSF GRFP Learning Community Outreach Grant, Individual Professional Development $1000.00 Graduate School Fieldwork Grant, 2017 $3300.00 College of Natural Sciences Teaching Fellowship, 2015, 2016 $6000.00 Graduate School Dissertation Research Grant, 2015 $1000.00 Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Travel Grant, 2013-2015 $1500.00 2nd Place, Gerald N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera Brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-2015 The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M. O'Donnell University of Maine - Main, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, and the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation O'Donnell, Kaitlyn M., "The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2338. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2338 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WINTER MOTH (OPEROPTHERA BRUMATA) AND ITS HOST PLANTS IN COASTAL MAINE By Kaitlyn O’Donnell B.S. Saint Michael’s College, 2011 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Entomology) The Graduate School The University of Maine August 2015 Advisory Committee: Eleanor Groden, Professor of Entomology, School of Biology and Ecology, Advisor Francis Drummond, Professor of Insect Ecology and Wild Blueberry Pest Management Specialist, School of Biology and Ecology and the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Joseph Elkinton, Professor of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Charlene Donahue, Forest Entomologist, Maine Forest Service THESIS ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Kaitlyn O’Donnell I affirm that this manuscript is the final and accepted thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fennoscandia Via the British Isles: Evidence for a Novel Post- Glacial Recolonization Route by Winter Moth (Operophtera Brumata)
    a Frontiers of Biogeography 2021, 13.1, e49581 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Northern Fennoscandia via the British Isles: evidence for a novel post- glacial recolonization route by winter moth (Operophtera brumata) Jeremy C. Andersen1 , Nathan P. Havill2 , Brian P. Griffin1, Jane U. Jepsen3 , Snorre B. Hagen4 , Tero Klemola5 , Isabel C. Barrio6 , Sofie A. Kjeldgaard7, Toke T. Høye7 , John Murlis8, Yuri N. Baranchikov9, Andrey V. Selikhovkin10,11 , Ole P. L. Vindstad12 , Adalgisa Caccone13 , and Joseph S. Elkinton1 1 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, USA; 2 Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Hamden, Connecticut, 06514, USA;3 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, FRAM High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway; 4 Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Svanhovd, NO-9925 Svanvik, Norway; 5 Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland; 6 Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Árleyni 22, IS-112 Reykjavík, Iceland; 7 Department of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark; 8 41 Royal Crescent, London W11 4SN, England; 9 Department of Forest Zoology, Sukachev Institute of Forest FRC KSC, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia; 1 0 Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game Management, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia; 1 1 Department of Biogeography & Environmental Protection, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7–9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation,1 2 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, PO Box 6050 Langnes N-9037, Tromsø, Norway;1 3 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Spanworm Moth Operophtera Bruceata
    Geometridae Operophtera bruceata Bruce Spanworm Moth 10 9 8 n=0 7 High Mt. 6 • N 5 u 4 3 m 2 b 1 e 0 r 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 NC counties: 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec o 10 f 9 n=1 = Sighting or Collection 8 • 7 Low Mt. High counts of: in NC since 2001 F 6 l 5 1 - Watauga - 2013-12-03 4 i 3 g 2 Status Rank h 1 0 NC US NC Global t 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 D Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec a 10 10 9 9 t 8 n=0 8 n=0 e 7 Pd 7 CP s 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 15 5 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Three periods to each month: 1-10 / 11-20 / 21-31 FAMILY: Geometridae SUBFAMILY: Larentiinae TRIBE: Operophterini TAXONOMIC_COMMENTS: One of three species in this genus recorded in North America north of Mexico (Troubridge and Fitzpatrick, 1993), and the only one recorded in North Carolina FIELD GUIDE DESCRIPTIONS: Beadle and Leckie (2012) ONLINE PHOTOS: MPG, BugGuide, BAMONA, BOLD TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION, ADULTS: Forbes (1948); Troubridge and Fitzpatrick (1993) TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION, IMMATURE STAGES: Forbes (1948); Wagner et al.
    [Show full text]
  • National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine
    APPENDIX 1 National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT 2007 – 2012 Current Research Projects in National Program 304* SYSTEMATICS 1245-22000-262-00D SYSTEMATICS OF FLIES OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPORTANCE; Allen Norrbom (P), Sonja Jean Scheffer, and Norman E. Woodley; Beltsville, Maryland. 1245-22000-263-00D SYSTEMATICS OF BEETLES IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE, LANDSCAPE PLANTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; Steven W. Lingafelter (P), Alexander Konstantinov, and Natalie Vandenberg; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-264-00D SYSTEMATICS OF LEPIDOPTERA: INVASIVE SPECIES, PESTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS; John W. Brown (P), Maria A. Solis, and Michael G. Pogue; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-265-00D SYSTEMATICS OF PARASITIC AND HERBIVOROUS WASPS OF AGRICULTURAL IMPORTANCE; Robert R. Kula (P), Matthew Buffington, and Michael W. Gates; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-266-00D MITE SYSTEMATICS AND ARTHROPOD DIAGNOSTICS WITH EMPHASIS ON INVASIVE SPECIES; Ronald Ochoa (P); Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-267-00D SYSTEMATICS OF HEMIPTERA AND RELATED GROUPS: PLANT PESTS, PREDATORS, AND DISEASE VECTORS; Thomas J. Henry (P), Stuart H. McKamey, and Gary L. Miller; Washington, D.C. INSECTS 0101-88888-040-00D OFFICE OF PEST MANAGEMENT; Sheryl Kunickis (P); Washington, D.C. 0212-22000-024-00D DISCOVERY, BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF NATURAL ENEMIES OF INSECT PESTS OF CROP AND URBAN AND NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS; Livy H. Williams III (P) and Kim Hoelmer; Montpellier, France. * Because of the nature of their research, many NP 304 projects contribute to multiple Problem Statements, so for the sake of clarity they have been grouped by focus area. For the sake of consistency, projects are listed and organized in Appendix 1 and 2 according to the ARS project number used to track projects in the Agency’s internal database.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Index to Volume 118 Compiled by Leslie Cody Abies balsamea, 46,95,124,251,268,274,361,388,401,510,530 confines, 431 lasiocarpa, 191,355,584 thomsoni, 431 Abrostola urentis, 541 Agelaius phoeniceus, 201 Acanthopteroctetes bimaculata, 532 Agelaius phoeniceus, Staging in Eastern South Dakota, Spring Acanthopteroctetidae, 532 Dispersal Patterns of Red-winged Blackbirds, 201 Acasis viridata, 539 Aglais milberti, 537 Acer,52 Agonopterix gelidella, 533 negundo, 309 Agriphila ruricolella, 536 rubrum, 41,96,136,136,251,277,361,508 vulgivagella, 536 saccharinum, 41,124,251 Agropyron spp., 400,584 saccharum, 361,507 cristatum, 300 spicatum, 362 pectiniforme, 560 Achigan à grande bouche, 523 repens, 300 à petite bouche, 523 sibiricum, 560 Achillea millefolium, 166 Agrostis sp., 169 Achnatherum richardsonii, 564 filiculmis, 558 Acipenser fulvescens, 523 gigantea, 560 Acipenseridae, 523 Aira praecox, 177 Acleris albicomana, 534 Aix sponsa, 131,230 britannia, 534 Alaska, Changes in Loon (Gavia spp.) and Red-necked Grebe celiana, 534 (Podiceps grisegena) Populations in the Lower Mata- emargana, 535 nuska-Susitna Valley, 210 forbesana, 534 Alaska, Interactions of Brown Bears, Ursus arctos, and Gray logiana, 534 Wolves, Canis lupus, at Katmai National Park and Pre- nigrolinea, 535 serve, 247 obligatoria, 534 Alaska, Seed Dispersal by Brown Bears, Ursus arctos,in schalleriana, 534 Southeastern, 499 variana, 534 Alaska, The Heather Vole, Genus Phenacomys, in, 438 Acorn, J.H., Review by, 468 Alberta: Distribution and Status, The Barred Owl, Strix varia Acossus
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of the Kingston Study Area
    Moths of the Kingston Study Area Last updated 30 July 2015 by Mike Burrell This checklist contains the 783 species known to have occurred within the Kingston Study. Major data sources include KFN bioblitzes, an earlier version created by Gary Ure (2013) and the Queen’s University Biological Station list by Kit Muma (2008). For information about contributing your sightings or to download the latest version of this checklist, please visit: http://kingstonfieldnaturalists.org/moths/moths.html Contents Superfamily: Tineoidea .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Family: Tineidae ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Tineinae .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Psychidae ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Subfamily: Psychinae ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Superfamily: Gracillarioidea ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Family: Gracillariidae ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Michigan, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 5Th International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods (Eds
    112 7.1 Friend or Foe: The Role of Native, Natural Enemies in the Biological Control of Winter Moth H.J. Broadley1, J.S. Elkinton2 and G.H. Boettner3 1Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected], 2Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected], 3Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected] Natural enemies that cross over from related native species to invasive species mediate invasions in complex ways (Strauss et al., 2012; Dearborn et al., 2016; Faillace et al., 2017). They have the potential to slow down invasions and aid in biological control efforts (Kenis et al., 2008; Vindstad et al., 2013; Dearborn et al., 2016). In the northeastern United States, the European winter moth, Operophtera brumata L. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is an invasive, forest pest causing widespread defoliation in rural and urban settings (Elkinton et al., 2014). Following successful biological control of winter moth in Nova Scotia and British Columbia using the tachinid fly, Cyzenis albicans (Fallén) (Diptera: Tachinidae) (Embree 1966; Murdoch et al., 1985; Roland and Embree, 1995), similar efforts are underway in the northeastern United States (Elkinton et al., 2015). While biocontrol shows promising results, success likely depends on additional mortality from native natural enemies. In the northeast U.S., the closest relative to winter moth is Bruce spanworm, O. bruceata (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The two are congeners and can hybridize (Gwiazdowski et al., 2013; Havill et al., 2017), thus it is likely that natural enemies from Bruce spanworm as well as other generalists could cross over to cause mortality to the winter moth population.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance
    Genome DNA Barcodes for Bio -surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2016-0024.R2 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the Author: 16-Jul-2016 Complete List of Authors: Ashfaq, Muhammad; University of Guelph Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Hebert, Paul; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, species identification,Draft cryptic taxa, invasive species, quarantine, pest Keyword: management https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 73 Genome DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Draft Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Genome Page 2 of 73 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa.
    [Show full text]