DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera Brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-2015 The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine Kaitlyn M. O'Donnell University of Maine - Main, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, and the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation O'Donnell, Kaitlyn M., "The Relationship Between the Winter Moth (Operophtera brumata) and Its Host Plants in Coastal Maine" (2015). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2338. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2338 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WINTER MOTH (OPEROPTHERA BRUMATA) AND ITS HOST PLANTS IN COASTAL MAINE By Kaitlyn O’Donnell B.S. Saint Michael’s College, 2011 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Entomology) The Graduate School The University of Maine August 2015 Advisory Committee: Eleanor Groden, Professor of Entomology, School of Biology and Ecology, Advisor Francis Drummond, Professor of Insect Ecology and Wild Blueberry Pest Management Specialist, School of Biology and Ecology and the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Joseph Elkinton, Professor of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts Charlene Donahue, Forest Entomologist, Maine Forest Service THESIS ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Kaitlyn O’Donnell I affirm that this manuscript is the final and accepted thesis. Signatures of all committee members are on file with the Graduate School at the University of Maine, 42 Stodder Hall, Orono, Maine. Dr. Eleanor Groden, Professor of Entomology Date ii © 2015 Kaitlyn O’Donnell All Rights Reserved iii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Maine, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for “fair use” copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Librarian. It is understood that any copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature: Date: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WINTER MOTH (OPEROPTHERA BRUMATA) AND ITS HOST PLANTS IN COASTAL MAINE By Kaitlyn O’Donnell Thesis Advisor: Dr. Eleanor Groden An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Entomology) August 2015 This project examines the recent outbreak of the invasive winter moth (Operophtera brumata) in mid-coast Maine. The winter moth was introduced into New England in the late 1990’s and low densities of winter moth were detected with pheromone traps throughout the Maine coast in 2006. Severe defoliation occurred for the first time in Maine in the spring of 2012 in Harpswell and Vinalhaven, ME. This pest attacks an extremely broad range of host plants, including forest hardwood trees and agricultural crops such as highbush blueberry and apple. The objectives of this study are to examine the differential development and survival of the winter moth on common hardwood forest trees as well as important agricultural crops, to determine the insect phenology in relation to host plants throughout the year in Maine, to monitor the relative population densities on different host plants, and to survey Maine winter moth for pathogens already present in the population. We found that larval survival and densities are significantly higher on red oak and apple trees and lowest on pin cherry. Larval survival is significantly higher when vi egg hatch is closely synchronized with host plant bud burst. Lastly, using molecular markers, we inferred the presence of winter moth nucleopolyhedrovirus in larvae collected from seven different host plants, including wild lowbush blueberry. Larvae were observed feeding on wild lowbush blueberry, a new host for this species. While larval survival and densities are lower on lowbush blueberry than on oak and apple, they readily feed on and cause severe damage to wild blueberry when populations are at outbreak levels. Through studying the biology of this insect, we are able to determine the factors that are closely linked to its survival in the hopes of developing methods of control before seeing irreparable damage to Maine’s forests and agriculture. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Eleanor Groden, for all of her guidance throughout my graduate career at the University of Maine. I would also like to thank my committee, Dr. Francis Drummond, Charlene Donahue, and Dr. Joseph Elkinton, for being so supportive and helpful with all aspects of my research. I have learned a great deal through this project and have really enjoyed my experience working with winter moth. I am also grateful for my funding sources, the Maine Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station, the Maine Agricultural Center, and the University of Maine Graduate School and Graduate Student Government. I thank Sharon Whitney, Marlene and Freddie Ward, and the residents of Harpswell for welcoming me into their homes, for their encouragement, and for showing so much interest in my research. I also thank Hillary Morin, who helped me with field work throughout my Master’s and did a wonderful job studying winter moth for her Honor’s thesis. I would like to thank Hannah Broadley and Dr. John Burand from the University of Massachusetts for teaching me the procedures for molecular NPV detection. I would like to thank my fellow laboratory mates Jen Lund, Elissa Ballman, and Tamara Levitsky for all of their help with field and laboratory work and moral support along the way. Lastly, I would like to thank my family and friends for always being there and believing in me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………..….iv LIST OF TABLES..……………………...…………………………………………………………………….…viii LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………………………………ix CHAPTER ONE: BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF THE WINTER MOTH…………………………1 Winter Moth Invasion……………………………………………………………………………………..1 Winter Moth Biology and Life Cycle…………………………………………………………………2 Potential Control…………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Damage to Host Plants……………………………………………………………………………………6 Host Plant Effects……………………………………………………………………………………………8 CHAPTER TWO: HOST PLANT EFFECTS ON WINTER MOTH LARVAL DEVELOPMENT AND SURVIVAL……………………………..………………………………………….11 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………11 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………….15 Host Plant Phenology…………………………………………………………………………16 Larval Density……………………………………………………………………………………17 Statistical Analysis…………………………………………………………………..17 Larval Development…………………………………………………………………………...18 Statistical Analysis…………………………………………………………………..18 Survival……………………………………………………………………………………………..19 Laboratory Rearing Experiment……………………………………………….19 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………..19 v Field Sleeve Cage Experiment…………………………………………………..20 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………..22 NPV Incidence…………………………………………………………………………23 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………..24 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 Host Plant Phenology…………………………………………………………………………24 Larval Density……………………………………………………………………………………25 Larval Development…………………………………………………………………………...30 Survival……………………………………………………………………………………………..32 Laboratory Rearing Experiment……………………………………………….32 Field Sleeve Cage Experiment…………………………………………………..36 NPV Incidence…………………………………………………………………………38 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….40 CHAPTER THREE: POPULATION TRENDS OF ADULT WINTER MOTH (OPEROPHTERA BRUMATA) OVER TWO YEARS IN HARPSWELL, MAINE…..………….48 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………..48 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………48 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………….49 Study Sites…………………………………………………………………………………………49 Male Relative Density…………………………………………………………………………50 Female Relative Density…………………………………………………………………......50 vi Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………51 Male Relative Density…………………………………………………………………………51 Female Relative Density……………………………………………………………………..54 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….55 CHAPTER FOUR: WINTER MOTH – SPRING DEFOLIATOR OF WILD BLUEBERRY………………………………………………………………………………………………………58 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………58 Description…………………………………………………………………………………………………..58 Adults………………………………………………………………………………………………..58 Eggs…………………………………………………………………………………………………..60 Larvae……………………………………………………………………………………………….61 Pupae………………………………………………………………………………………………...62 Life Cycle……………………………………………………………………………………………………62 Host Plant Damage………………………………………………………………………………………..64 Control and Management………………………………………………………………………………64 LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………………………………………………...66 APPENDIX A: ADULT FEMALE PREDATION………....……………………………………..............73 APPENDIX B: PUPAL SURVIVAL IN POTTING MIX……………………………..…………...........77 BIOGRAPHY OF THE AUTHOR…………………………………………………………………………….79 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1. Mean number of winter moth larvae and host
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S

    ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S

    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
  • Biodiversity Climate Change Impacts Report Card Technical Paper 12. the Impact of Climate Change on Biological Phenology In

    Biodiversity Climate Change Impacts Report Card Technical Paper 12. the Impact of Climate Change on Biological Phenology In

    Sparks Pheno logy Biodiversity Report Card paper 12 2015 Biodiversity Climate Change impacts report card technical paper 12. The impact of climate change on biological phenology in the UK Tim Sparks1 & Humphrey Crick2 1 Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB 2 Natural England, Eastbrook, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8DR Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 1 Sparks Pheno logy Biodiversity Report Card paper 12 2015 Executive summary Phenology can be described as the study of the timing of recurring natural events. The UK has a long history of phenological recording, particularly of first and last dates, but systematic national recording schemes are able to provide information on the distributions of events. The majority of data concern spring phenology, autumn phenology is relatively under-recorded. The UK is not usually water-limited in spring and therefore the major driver of the timing of life cycles (phenology) in the UK is temperature [H]. Phenological responses to temperature vary between species [H] but climate change remains the major driver of changed phenology [M]. For some species, other factors may also be important, such as soil biota, nutrients and daylength [M]. Wherever data is collected the majority of evidence suggests that spring events have advanced [H]. Thus, data show advances in the timing of bird spring migration [H], short distance migrants responding more than long-distance migrants [H], of egg laying in birds [H], in the flowering and leafing of plants[H] (although annual species may be more responsive than perennial species [L]), in the emergence dates of various invertebrates (butterflies [H], moths [M], aphids [H], dragonflies [M], hoverflies [L], carabid beetles [M]), in the migration [M] and breeding [M] of amphibians, in the fruiting of spring fungi [M], in freshwater fish migration [L] and spawning [L], in freshwater plankton [M], in the breeding activity among ruminant mammals [L] and the questing behaviour of ticks [L].
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance

    DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance

    Page 1 of 44 DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 99.245.208.197 on 09/06/16 1 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. Page 2 of 44 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa. Because of their importance as pests and disease vectors impacting global agriculture and forestry, DNA barcode results on these arthropods have significant implications for quarantine detection, regulation, and management.
  • Fall Cankerworm

    Fall Cankerworm

    Pest Profile Photo credit: David Keith & Tim Miller, UNL Entomology Extension Common Name: Fall Cankerworm Scientific Name: Alsophila pometaria Order and Family: Lepidoptera, Geometridae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance Egg dark grayish-brown with a dot and a ring 1.0 mm on top Larva/Nymph vary between light green and dark 25.0 mm (mature larvae) brownish-green have white lines running down their body from the head to the tip of the abdomen dark-brownish green caterpillars have a black stripe the length of their back Adult males are small, have wings, and are grayish color with some white lines along 25.0 – 35.0 mm (male the wings wingspread) females have a grayish colored body and 10.0 – 12.0 mm (female) wingless Pupa (if applicable) yellow to yellow-green in color wrapped in a silken cocoon Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Chewing (caterpillar) Host plant/s: black cherry, basswood, red and white oaks, beech, ash, boxelder, elm, sugar and red maples Description of Damage (larvae and adults): When the larvae are young, they eat on the underside of the leaves, making the leaf appear skeletonized. As the larvae get older, they cause more damage by eating almost the whole leaf. In some cases, the damage is to the extent of defoliation of the tree, especially in severe cases of outbreaks. Sometimes in bad outbreaks, these caterpillars can defoliate many trees. References: Ciesla, M, W. & Asaro, C (2016) Fall Crankerworm. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 182. Published by U.S. Deparment of Agriculture- Forest Service. Portland, Oregon.
  • Pest Alert: Box Tree Moth (Cydalima Perspectalis)

    Pest Alert: Box Tree Moth (Cydalima Perspectalis)

    Pest Alert Box Tree Moth (Cydalima perspectalis) The box tree moth is an invasive pest that primarily feeds on boxwood species (Buxus spp). In its native range, it also feeds on burning bush (Euonymus alatus), Japanese spindletree (E. japonicus), purple holly (Ilex chinensis), and orange jessamine (Murraya paniculate) once boxwood in the vicinity are completely defoliated. Distribution and Spread The box tree moth is native to temperate and subtropical regions in Asia. It was first reported in Europe in 2007, after which it spread rapidly across European countries and into Western Asia and Northern Africa. In 2018, it was documented in Canada. The rate of spread for the box tree moth has varied since its introduction in Europe, with some cases peaking at 96 miles per year. Long distance movement of the box tree moth across Europe occurred primarily through the movement of infested Adult moths (top and bottom left), damage (bottom) boxwood plantings. Box tree moths are highly mobile and used for edging, as hedges, thick brown border spanning 1.6 and are good fliers. Natural spread and/or clipped into different shapes to 1.8 inches. Some adults have of this moth in Europe is about 3 to make topiaries. The box tree completely brown wings with a small to 6 miles per year. One analysis moth can cause heavy defoliation of white streak on each forewing. Males from Europe concluded that natural boxwood plants if populations are left and females show both colorations. dispersal from continental Europe unchecked. Defoliation of existing to the United Kingdom was possible, and new growth can kill the plant.
  • Softwood Insect Pests

    Softwood Insect Pests

    Forest & Shade Tree Insect & Disease Conditions for Maine A Summary of the 2011 Situation Forest Health & Monitoring Division Maine Forest Service Summary Report No. 23 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION March 2012 Augusta, Maine Forest Insect & Disease—Advice and Technical Assistance Maine Department of Conservation, Maine Forest Service Insect and Disease Laboratory 168 State House Station, 50 Hospital Street, Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 phone (207) 287-2431 fax (207) 287-2432 http://www.maine.gov/doc/mfs/idmhome.htm The Maine Forest Service/Forest Health and Monitoring (FH&M) Division maintains a diagnostic laboratory staffed with forest entomologists and a forest pathologist. The staff can provide practical information on a wide variety of forest and shade tree problems for Maine residents. Our technical reference library and insect collection enables the staff to accurately identify most causal agents. Our website is a portal to not only our material and notices of current forest pest issues but also provides links to other resources. A stock of information sheets and brochures is available on many of the more common insect and disease problems. We can also provide you with a variety of useful publications on topics related to forest insects and diseases. Submitting Samples - Samples brought or sent in for diagnosis should be accompanied by as much information as possible including: host plant, type of damage (i.e., canker, defoliation, wilting, wood borer, etc.), date, location, and site description along with your name, mailing address and day-time telephone number or e-mail address. Forms are available (on our Web site and on the following page) for this purpose.
  • Yponomeuta Malinellus

    Yponomeuta Malinellus

    Yponomeuta malinellus Scientific Name Yponomeuta malinellus (Zeller) Synonyms: Hyponomeuta malinella Zeller Hyponomeuta malinellus Zeller Yponomeuta malinella Yponomeuta padella (L.) Yponomeuta padellus malinellus Common Names Apple ermine moth, small ermine moth Figure 1. Y. malinellus adult (Image courtesy of Eric LaGasa, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Bugwood.org). Type of Pest Caterpillar Taxonomic Position Class: Insecta, Order: Lepidoptera, Family: Yponomeutidae Reason for Inclusion 2012 CAPS Additional Pests of Concern Pest Description Eggs: “The individual egg has the appearance of a flattened, yellow, soft disc with the centre area slightly raised, and marked with longitudinal ribbings. Ten to eighty eggs are deposited in overlapping rows to form a flattened, slightly convex, oval egg mass. At the time of deposition, the egg mass is covered with a glutinous substance, which on exposure to air forms a resistant, protective coating. This coating not only acts as an egg-shield but provides an ideal overwintering site for the diapausing first-instar larvae. The egg mass is yellow at first but then darkens until eventually it is grey-brown and resembles the bark of apple twigs. Egg masses average 3-10 mm [0.12-0.39 in] in length and 4 mm [0.16 in] in width but vary considerably in size and shape” (CFIA, 2006). Larvae: “Grey, yellowish-grey, greenish-brown, and greyish-green larvae have been reported. The mature larva is approximately 15-20 mm [0.59-0.79 in] in length; the anterior and posterior extremities are much narrower than the remainder of the body. There are 2 conspicuous laterodorsal black dots on each segment from the mesothorax to the 8th abdominal segment.
  • No Slide Title

    No Slide Title

    Tachinidae: The “other” parasitoids Diego Inclán University of Padova Outline • Briefly (re-) introduce parasitoids & the parasitoid lifestyle • Quick survey of dipteran parasitoids • Introduce you to tachinid flies • major groups • oviposition strategies • host associations • host range… • Discuss role of tachinids in biological control Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Life cycle of a parasitoid Alien (1979) Life cycle of a parasitoid Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Parasitoid does not kill the host kill its host Insects life cycles Life cycle of a parasitoid Some facts about parasitoids • Parasitoids are diverse (15-25% of all insect species) • Hosts of parasitoids = virtually all terrestrial insects • Parasitoids are among the dominant natural enemies of phytophagous insects (e.g., crop pests) • Offer model systems for understanding community structure, coevolution & evolutionary diversification Distribution/frequency of parasitoids among insect orders Primary groups of parasitoids Diptera (flies) ca. 20% of parasitoids Hymenoptera (wasps) ca. 70% of parasitoids Described Family Primary hosts Diptera parasitoid sp Sciomyzidae 200? Gastropods: (snails/slugs) Nemestrinidae 300 Orth.: Acrididae Bombyliidae 5000 primarily Hym., Col., Dip. Pipunculidae 1000 Hom.:Auchenorrycha Conopidae 800 Hym:Aculeata Lep., Orth., Hom., Col., Sarcophagidae 1250? Gastropoda + others Lep., Hym., Col., Hem., Tachinidae > 8500 Dip., + many others Pyrgotidae 350 Col:Scarabaeidae Acroceridae 500 Arach.:Aranea Hym., Dip., Col., Lep., Phoridae 400?? Isop.,Diplopoda
  • The Winter Moth ( Operophtera Brumata) and Its Natural Enemies in Orkney

    The Winter Moth ( Operophtera Brumata) and Its Natural Enemies in Orkney

    Spatial ecology of an insect host-parasitoid-virus interaction: the winter moth ( Operophtera brumata) and its natural enemies in Orkney Simon Harold Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Biological Sciences September 2009 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement ©2009 The University of Leeds and Simon Harold ii Acknowledgements I gratefully acknowledge the support of my supervisors Steve Sait and Rosie Hails for their continued advice and support throughout the duration of the project. I particularly thank Steve for his patience, enthusiasm, and good humour over the four years—and especially for getting work back to me so quickly, more often than not because I had sent it at the eleventh hour. I would also like to express my gratitude to the Earth and Biosphere Institute (EBI) at the University of Leeds for funding this project in the first instance. Steve Carver also helped secure funding. The molecular work was additionally funded by both a NERC short-term grant, and funding from UKPOPNET, to whom I am also grateful. None of the fieldwork, and indeed the scope and scale of the project, would have been possible if not for the stellar cast of fieldworkers that made the journey to Orkney. They were (in order of appearance): Steve Sait, Rosie Hails, Jackie Osbourne, Bill Tyne, Cathy Fiedler, Ed Jones, Mike Boots, Sandra Brand, Shaun Dowman, Rachael Simister, Alan Reynolds, Kim Hutchings, James Rosindell, Rob Brown, Catherine Bourne, Audrey Zannesse, Leo Graves and Steven White.
  • Predicting the Invasion Range for a Highly Polyphagous And

    Predicting the Invasion Range for a Highly Polyphagous And

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 59: 1–20 (2020) Winter moth environmental niche 1 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.59.53550 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Predicting the invasion range for a highly polyphagous and widespread forest herbivore Laura M. Blackburn1, Joseph S. Elkinton2, Nathan P. Havill3, Hannah J. Broadley2, Jeremy C. Andersen2, Andrew М. Liebhold1,4 1 Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA 2 Department of En- vironmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA 3 Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Hamden, Connecticut, USA 4 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Praha 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic Corresponding author: Andrew Liebhold ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ingolf Kühn | Received 23 April 2020 | Accepted 26 June 2020 | Published 28 July 2020 Citation: Blackburn LM, Elkinton JS, Havill NP, Broadley HJ, Andersen JC, Liebhold AМ (2020) Predicting the invasion range for a highly polyphagous and widespread forest herbivore. NeoBiota 59: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3897/ neobiota.59.53550 Abstract Here we compare the environmental niche of a highly polyphagous forest Lepidoptera species, the winter moth (Operophtera brumata), in its native and invaded range. During the last 90 years, this European tree fo- livore has invaded North America in at least three regions and exhibited eruptive population behavior in both its native and invaded range. Despite its importance as both a forest and agricultural pest, neither the poten- tial extent of this species’ invaded range nor the geographic source of invading populations from its native range are known.
  • The Use and Exchange of Biological Control Agents for Food and Agriculture

    The Use and Exchange of Biological Control Agents for Food and Agriculture

    BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 October 2009 E COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE THE USE AND EXCHANGE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE by Matthew J.W. Cock, Joop C. van Lenteren, Jacques Brodeur, Barbara I.P.Barratt, Franz Bigler, Karel Bolckmans, Fernando L. Cônsoli, Fabian Haas, Peter G. Mason, José Roberto P. Parra 1 This document has been prepared at the request of the Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture by the Global Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit-Sharing of the International Organisation for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC), as a contribution to the cross-sectoral theme, Consideration of policies and arrangements for access and benefit-sharing for genetic resources for food and agriculture , which the Commission will consider at its Twelfth Regular Session. The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members. 1 For affiliation of the authors see Annex 2. BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION .................................................................................................................1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................4
  • Maine Forest Service MAINE DEPARTMENT OF

    Maine Forest Service MAINE DEPARTMENT OF

    Maine Forest Service ● MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FALL CANKERWORM Alsophila pometaria (Harris) Insect and Disease Laboratory ● 168 State House Station ● 50 Hospital Street ● Augusta, Maine ● 04333­0168 Damage This important pest of forest and shade trees occurs generally throughout most of Northeastern America where it feeds on a variety of hardwoods. Damage is first noticed in early May when feeding by the tiny larvae known as "cankerworms," "loopers," "inchworms" or "measuring worms" on the opening buds and expanding leaves causes the foliage to be skeletonized. Later as the larvae mature all but the midrib (and veins) of leaves are devoured. Occasional outbreaks of this pest in Maine have caused severe defoliation of oak and elm. The outbreaks are most often localized and usually last three to four years before natural control factors cause the population to collapse. Trees subjected to two or more years of heavy defoliation may be seriously damaged, especially weaker trees or trees growing on poor sites. Hosts Its preferred hosts are oak, elm and apple, but it also occurs on maple, beech, ash, poplar, box elder, basswood, and cherry. Description and Habits The wingless, greyish­brown female cankerworm moths emerge from the duff with the onset of cold weather in October and November and crawl up the tree trunks. The male moth is greyish­brown with a one inch wing span. Males can often be seen flitting through infested stands during the day or warmer nights during hunting season. The females are not often seen. Females deposit their eggs in single­layered compact masses of 100 or more on the bark of smaller branches and twigs of trees often high in the crown from October to early December.