DOCSLIB.ORG

Declaration of David A. Rosenfeld Filed on Behalf of Robbins Geller

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CARRIE SCHEUFELE, JEFFREY : Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-05753-JGK SCHEUFELE and NICHOLAS ORAM, : Individually and on Behalf of All Others : CLASS ACTION Similarly Situated, : : DECLARATION OF DAVID A. Plaintiffs, : ROSENFELD FILED ON BEHALF OF : ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD vs. : LLP IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR : AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND TABLEAU SOFTWARE, INC., CHRISTIAN : EXPENSES CHABOT, THOMAS WALKER, PATRICK : HANRAHAN and CHRISTOPHER STOLTE, : : Defendants. : x Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 9 I, DAVID A. ROSENFELD, declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller” or the “Firm”). I am submitting this declaration in support of my Firm’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses and charges (“expenses”) in connection with services rendered in the above-entitled action (the “Litigation”). 2. This Firm is Lead Counsel of record for Lead Plaintiff United Association National Pension Fund (formerly known as The Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund) and the Class herein. 3. The information in this declaration regarding the Firm’s time and expenses is taken from time and expense reports and supporting documentation prepared and/or maintained by the Firm in the ordinary course of business. I am the partner who oversaw and/or conducted the day-to- day activities in the Litigation and I reviewed these reports (and backup documentation where necessary or appropriate) in connection with the preparation of this declaration. The purpose of this review was to confirm both the accuracy of the entries on the printouts as well as the necessity for, and reasonableness of, the time and expenses committed to the Litigation. As a result of this review, reductions were made to both time and expenses in the exercise of billing judgment. Based on this review and the adjustments made, I believe that the time reflected in the Firm’s lodestar calculation and the expenses for which payment is sought herein are reasonable and were necessary for the effective and efficient prosecution and resolution of the Litigation. In addition, I believe that these expenses are reasonable and were necessary for the effective and efficient prosecution and resolution of the Litigation. 4. After the reductions referred to above, the number of hours spent on the Litigation by the Firm is 18,990.20. A breakdown of the lodestar is provided in the attached Exhibit A. The - 1 - Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 3 of 9 lodestar amount for attorney/paraprofessional time based on the Firm’s 2021 rates is $12,430,152.75. The hourly rates shown in Exhibit A are the Firm’s regular 2021 rates in contingent cases set by the Firm for each individual. These hourly rates are consistent with hourly rates submitted by the Firm to state and federal courts during 2021 in other securities class action litigation. The Firm’s rates are set based on periodic analysis of rates charged by firms performing comparable work both on the plaintiff and defense side. For personnel who are no longer employed by the Firm, the “current rate” used for the lodestar calculation is based upon the rate for that person in his or her final year of employment with the Firm. 5. The Firm seeks an award of $1,040,478.69 in expenses and charges in connection with the prosecution of the Litigation. Those expenses and charges are summarized by category in the attached Exhibit B. 6. The following is additional information regarding certain of these expenses: (a) Filing, Witness and Other Fees: $7,295.19. These expenses have been paid to the Court for filing fees and to attorney service firms or individuals who either: (i) served process of the complaint or subpoenas; or (ii) obtained copies of court documents for plaintiffs. The vendors who were paid for these services are set forth in the attached Exhibit C. (b) Class Action Notices: $110,192.76. This amount represents the costs of printing and mailing the Notice of Pendency of Class Action to Class Members and publishing a summary notice pursuant to the Court’s Order of May 12, 2020 (Dkt. No. 144). (c) Transportation, Hotels & Meals: $103,031.61. In connection with the prosecution of this case, the Firm has paid for travel expenses to, among other things, attend court hearings, meet with witnesses, mediators and opposing counsel and take or defend depositions. The date, destination and purpose of each trip is set forth in the attached Exhibit D. - 2 - Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 4 of 9 (d) Court Hearing Transcripts and Deposition Reporting, Transcripts and Videography: $77,144.74. The vendors who were paid for these services are listed in the attached Exhibit E. (e) Experts/Consultants: $547,787.50. (i) Tasta Group (dba Caliber Advisors, Inc.) (“Caliber”): $237,787.50. Lead Plaintiff retained the services of Caliber, a valuations and economic consulting firm and its managing director, Bjorn Steinholt, CFA, to assist in financial analysis of materiality, loss causation, market efficiency, and damages. Caliber specializes in financial analyses and related economic consulting services with Mr. Steinholt having more than 25 years of experience providing capital markets consulting. Mr. Steinholt provided Lead Plaintiff with substantial assistance in its economic analysis in the initial investigation, estimation of damages, and loss causation allegations, provided an expert declaration on allegations related to market efficiency in connection with Lead Plaintiff’s successful motion for class certification, and provided a report addressing issues that Lead Plaintiff intended to prove at trial, including materiality, loss causation, and damages. During the Litigation, Mr. Steinholt sat for two separate depositions. His opinions and his services in these proceedings contributed materially to the benefits achieved for the Class. (ii) M. Todd Henderson: $109,000.00. Lead Plaintiff retained the services of University of Chicago Law Professor M. Todd Henderson, an expert on the use of Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. In his reports, Professor Henderson offered opinions about Defendants’ insider trading and how that trading was influenced by Defendants’ Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. Professor Henderson reviewed thousands of pages of documents, met with Lead Counsel several times (both in person and by telephone) to discuss his opinions, and provided testimony during a one day-long - 3 - Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 5 of 9 deposition. Professor Henderson’s opinions and his services in these proceedings contributed materially to the benefits achieved for the Class. (iii) Heights Consulting, LLC: $173,250.00. Lead Plaintiff retained the services of Heights Consulting, a business consulting firm, and its Principal Kevin Hill, to assist counsel in assessing the Business Intelligence industry and how the internal evidence produced in the Litigation reflected on Tableau’s position in that market both before and during the Class Period. Mr. Hill analyzed thousands of documents to understand the market for Tableau’s products and Tableau’s relative position in that market compared to its competitors. Mr. Hill’s opinions addressed issues that Lead Plaintiff intended to prove at trial, including falsity, scienter, and materiality. During the Litigation, Mr. Hill provided substantive testimony during a one day-long deposition. Mr. Hill’s services in these proceedings contributed materially to the benefits achieved for the Class. (iv) FitforProjects, Inc.: $24,750.00. Lead Plaintiff retained the services of FitforProjects, a data analysis firm, to assist its expert Kevin Hill in understanding volumes of data relating to the demand for Tableau’s products. Its analysis enabled Mr. Hill to develop his opinions concerning Tableau’s position in the Business Intelligence market and how the product offering by other companies in that market affected Tableau’s ability to close deals and generate revenue compared to Tableau’s performance historically. These services were necessary for Mr. Hill to understand the data and develop his opinions, which contributed materially to the benefits achieved for the Class. (v) The Expert Institute Group, LLC: $3,000.00. Lead Counsel utilized the services of The Expert Institute to identify, verify, and retain the services of Kevin Hill, a Business and Market Intelligence expert, to assist in analyzing and understanding the market for - 4 - Case 1:17-cv-05753-JGK Document 188 Filed 08/10/21 Page 6 of 9 Tableau’s products before and during the Class Period and Tableau’s relative position in that market compared to its competitors. (f) Photocopies: $3,665.99. In connection with this case, the Firm made 15,492 black and white copies. Robbins Geller requests $0.15 per copy for a total of $2,323.80. Each time an in-house copy machine is used, our billing system requires that a case or administrative billing code be entered and that is how the number of in-house copies were identified as related to the Litigation. The Firm also paid $1,342.19 to outside copy vendors. A breakdown of these outside charges by date and vendor is set forth in the attached Exhibit F. (g) Online Legal and Financial Research: $21,282.90. This category includes vendors such as LexisNexis Products, Refinitiv (formerly Thomson Financial), Transunion Risk and Alternative Data Solutions, and Westlaw. These resources were used to obtain access to SEC filings, factual databases, legal research and for cite-checking of briefs. This expense represents the expenses incurred by Robbins Geller for use of these services in connection with this Litigation.
Recommended publications
  • Refinitiv UK Parent Limited

    Refinitiv UK Parent Limited

    DocuSign Envelope ID: 03AE1696-6072-4AFF-8189-06C441DF1ED5 Registration number: 11273092 Refinitiv UK Parent Limited Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2019 DocuSign Envelope ID: 03AE1696-6072-4AFF-8189-06C441DF1ED5 Refinitiv UK Parent Limited Contents Strategic Report 1 to 3 Directors' Report 4 to 7 Independent Auditor's Report 8 to 13 Profit and Loss Account 14 Statement of Financial Position 15 Statement of Changes in Equity 16 Notes to the Financial Statements 17 to 39 DocuSign Envelope ID: 03AE1696-6072-4AFF-8189-06C441DF1ED5 Refinitiv UK Parent Limited Strategic Report for the Year Ended 31 December 2019 The directors present their strategic report and the audited financial statement for the financial year ended 31 December 2019. Definitions As used in this annual report, the "Group" and "Refinitiv" refers to the Refinitiv Holdings Limited and its subsidiary undertakings, including joint ventures and associates. The "Company" refers to Refinitiv UK Parent Limited. Fair review of the business The principal activity of the Company is to act as a holding company and as a group treasury company. The Company was incorporated on 23 March 2018 and comparative numbers for the previous year have been presented accordingly. The loss for the financial period amounted to $161,960,000 (2018: $32,410,000). As at 31 December 2019, the Company has a net asset position of $2,589,659,000 (2018: $2,701,767,000). Principal risks and uncertainties As a holding company, the principal risks and uncertainties are limited to its investment portfolio. The Company may be required to take future impairment charges that would reduce the reported assets and earnings as a result of realising the underlying assets.
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book

    The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book

    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
  • Instructions for Refinitiv Bill to Legal Entity Changes

    Instructions for Refinitiv Bill to Legal Entity Changes

    The Financial and Risk business of Thomson Reuters is now Refinitiv refinitiv.com Instructions for Refinitiv Bill to Legal Entity Changes The Refinitiv Bill to Legal Entity file details up-to-date information relating to supplier invoice submission , such as Legal Entity name, Bill To/Registered Address, tax registration numbers, mailing addresses(where invoices are submitted in hard copy ) and e-mail ids for electronic submission of invoices. The file also highlights any legal entity names, calling out both the old and the new legal entity names along with the date on which the name change becomes effective. Note: This is a dynamic document with updates made on a weekly basis, where required, till all changes have been finalized. Please therefore continue to refer to this portal to confirm and check invoice submission protocols Guidelines to be followed while referring to the Document: 1. The file provides country-wise-legal entity names- old names(where the invoices used to be addressed) to Vs new legal entity name(where the invoices should be billed to going forward) 2. Bill to Registered address- The address which needs to be printed on the invoice along with the Legal Entity name 3. Tax Registration number- This is mandatory information to be printed on the invoices for all VAT applicable countries. 4. Invoice mailing address- This is the physical mailing address and should be used only where hard copy requirement is mandatory for invoice submission. The vendors are requested not to send physical invoices where Soft Copy requirements apply- Refer column Hard copy/Soft Copy for more details.
  • Enron and Co

    Enron and Co

    Enron and Co. - the fiasco of the new USA-style economy Eric Toussaint (*) Twenty years of deregulation and market liberalization on a planetary scale have eliminated all the safety barriers that might have prevented the cascade effect of crises of the Enron type. All capitalist companies of the Triad and emerging markets have evolved, some with their own variations, on the same lines as in the USA. The planet's private banking and financial institutions (as well as insurance companies) are in a bad way, having adopted ever riskier practices. The big industrial groups have all undergone a high degree of financialization and they, too, are very vulnerable. The succession of scandals shows just how vacuous are the declarations of the US leaders and their admirers in the four corners of the globe (see Ahold, Parmalat,…). A mechanism equivalent to several time -bombs is under way on the scale of all the economies on the planet. To name just a few of those bombs: over indebtedness of companies and households, the derivatives market (which in the words of the billionaire Warren Buffet, are « financial weapons of mass destruction »), the bubble of property speculation (most explosive in the USA and the UK), the crisis of insurance companies and that of pension funds. It is time to defuse these bombs and think of another way of doing things, in the USA and elsewhere. Of course, it is not enough to defuse the bombs and dream of another possible world. We have to grapple with the roots of the problems by redistributing wealth on the basis of social justice.
  • When Exactly Is It Time to Make Your Personal Exit?

    When Exactly Is It Time to Make Your Personal Exit?

    When exactly is it time to make your personal exit? Consider all of the players who have over stood their hands in the last two years. And I am not talking about you, or me, or our personal stock holdings here. Not all that long ago, Ken Lay was the toast of Houston; a regular at the White House, the Texas if not the California Governor’s Mansion, and all the best charity events in town. Consider Enron even bought the naming rights for the local arena. Now Lay would be most welcome all over town on a barbeque spit, anybody’s barbeque spit, rotating around with his tail feathers just above the coals. How about Bernie Ebbers? What must the new trophy wife be thinking? Whatever lifestyle she thought she was signing on to enjoy a couple of years ago surely didn’t include the prospect of personal bankruptcy and a three-bedroom ranch house with a carport for the used Chevy. Let’s just watch and see how long true love lasts in the face of what lies ahead for Mrs. Ebbers. What will the new little wifey really think as the “wealthy tycoon” is exposed for having been right up to his elbows in cooking the revenues? Will she really hang out when he trades in his vertical pinstripes for the government -issue horizontal ones? Perhaps you prefer Sam Waksal? Recently Sam decided to go the full 100 yards dash naked. He insisted in Court in August that Imclone will ultimately help a lot of people beat cancer, that he would not plea bargain but rather prove his innocence, and all those apparent efforts to sell his stock were just a big misunderstanding.
  • Ethics and Investment Management: True Reform Marianne M

    Ethics and Investment Management: True Reform Marianne M

    Ethics and Investment Management: True Reform Marianne M. Jennings These are introspective times for those involved in the financial markets. Some feel a sense of renewal via reform. Others, who have come to the realization that Frank Quattrone, late Silicon Valley guru of Credit Suisse First Boston, will do about one month in prison for each word that he wrote in a hasty e-mail to his employees, feel fear, particularly of New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and e-mail.1 Others wonder if we really “get it.” That is, after all that we have In the era of Enron, witnessed, been involved with, and, sadly, in some cases, sanctioned, are we really renewed and reformed, or have we simply taken our WorldCom, and lashes and moved on to find other circuitous ways to do what we were doing before? the rest, the lapses The answer to the question of true reform requires exploration of three areas: (1) the crises that led to the current market and regulatory reforms, (2) the reforms themselves, and (3) what will were great, the bring about true reform. conflicts many, Crises That Led to Reforms Taking stock of the types of conduct that led to indictments, reforms, and the cost, in settlements, and fines yields two groups of observations: (1) The practices and conduct of analysts that were sanctioned and reformed terms of investor were not close calls. (2) We were engaged in repetitive behavior; we’ve been down this road before. trust, nearly Not Close Calls. One of the common defenses offered by those accused of ethical or legal lapses is, “It’s a gray area,” “The law is unspeakable.
  • Completeandleft

    Completeandleft

    MEN WOMEN 1. JA Jason Aldean=American singer=188,534=33 Julia Alexandratou=Model, singer and actress=129,945=69 Jin Akanishi=Singer-songwriter, actor, voice actor, Julie Anne+San+Jose=Filipino actress and radio host=31,926=197 singer=67,087=129 John Abraham=Film actor=118,346=54 Julie Andrews=Actress, singer, author=55,954=162 Jensen Ackles=American actor=453,578=10 Julie Adams=American actress=54,598=166 Jonas Armstrong=Irish, Actor=20,732=288 Jenny Agutter=British film and television actress=72,810=122 COMPLETEandLEFT Jessica Alba=actress=893,599=3 JA,Jack Anderson Jaimie Alexander=Actress=59,371=151 JA,James Agee June Allyson=Actress=28,006=290 JA,James Arness Jennifer Aniston=American actress=1,005,243=2 JA,Jane Austen Julia Ann=American pornographic actress=47,874=184 JA,Jean Arthur Judy Ann+Santos=Filipino, Actress=39,619=212 JA,Jennifer Aniston Jean Arthur=Actress=45,356=192 JA,Jessica Alba JA,Joan Van Ark Jane Asher=Actress, author=53,663=168 …….. JA,Joan of Arc José González JA,John Adams Janelle Monáe JA,John Amos Joseph Arthur JA,John Astin James Arthur JA,John James Audubon Jann Arden JA,John Quincy Adams Jessica Andrews JA,Jon Anderson John Anderson JA,Julie Andrews Jefferson Airplane JA,June Allyson Jane's Addiction Jacob ,Abbott ,Author ,Franconia Stories Jim ,Abbott ,Baseball ,One-handed MLB pitcher John ,Abbott ,Actor ,The Woman in White John ,Abbott ,Head of State ,Prime Minister of Canada, 1891-93 James ,Abdnor ,Politician ,US Senator from South Dakota, 1981-87 John ,Abizaid ,Military ,C-in-C, US Central Command, 2003-
  • The Inevitability of a Strong SEC, 91 Cornell L

    The Inevitability of a Strong SEC, 91 Cornell L

    Cornell Law Review Volume 91 Article 1 Issue 4 May 2006 The nevI itability of a Strong SEC Robert A. Prentice Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert A. Prentice, The Inevitability of a Strong SEC, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 775 (2006) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol91/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INEVITABILITY OF A STRONG SEC Robert A. Prenticet There are many visions for the future of securities regulation. One prominent view fratures significant private contractingfor disclosure and fraud protection. Another envisions regulatory competition, enabling compa- nies to choosefrom among a menu of regulatory regimes provided by different states, nations, or securities exchanges competing for incorporations or list- ings. This article demonstrates that these two regulatory regimes rely too heavily upon the reputationalconstraint, which is insufficient for the signifi- cant task of securities regulation. Tenets of behavioral psychology suggest that self-serving bias and other factors will too often cause managers to choose regulatory regimes that serve their own best interests rather than those of shareholders. Around the globe, most developed economies have rejected private con- tracting and regulatory competition in favor of emulating the United States' current strong-SEC model. An impressive body of transnationalempirical evidence supports the viewpoint that the strong-SEC regulatory model is sig- nificantly more effective than alternatives at promoting capital markets.
  • Weltweit Auf Schnäppchenjagd

    Weltweit Auf Schnäppchenjagd

    DAS MAGAZIN FÜR WIRTSCHAFT, POLITIK & INVESTMENTPRODUKTE GLOBALE AKTIENFONDS Weltweit auf 5,90 Euro | 2020 2020 / Schnäppchenjagd Ausgabe 10 Ausgabe | Satte Gewinne Wie Fondsmanager die Branchenrotation an den Börsen nützen. 4profit Verlag GmbH, Rotenturmstraße 12, 1010 Wien 12, 1010 GmbH, Rotenturmstraße Verlag 4profit | MZ 03Z035262 M MZ 03Z035262 | Inflation Warum man keine Angst vor stark steigenden Preisen haben muss. Österreichische Post AG Post Österreichische Digitalisierung Nachhaltigkeit Aktien-Tipp Setzen Sie mit speziellen Green Bonds und ESG- Aixtron überzeugt mit Fonds auf den weiter Anleihen erleben einen weit überlegenen High boomenden IT-Sektor! deutlichen Aufschwung. Tech-Anlagen. Finanzpolitik + Volkswirtschaft + Länder- und Branchenanalysen + Banking + Investmentfonds + Aktien + Immobilien + Rohstoffe + Blockchain + Alternative Investments + Versicherungen editorial Branchentrends er Covid-Virus grassiert wieder in Europa – die zweite Welle ist da. Auf der Landkarte, in der die Regionen mit hohen Infektionsraten D markiert sind, dominiert bereits wieder die Signalfarbe Rot. Gegen- seitige Reisewarnungen, Maskenpflicht und Lokalschließungen nehmen zu, kein Thema beherrscht unseren Alltag mehr als Corona und ändert immer stär- ker unsere Gewohnheiten. An den Finanzmärkten zucken die Kurse auf und ab, die Visibilität der Unternehmensentwicklungen ist gering. Laufend tickern Nachrichten über Massenentlassungen und Sparprogramme über den Mario Franzin, Bildschirm – eigentlich zum Fürchten. Chefredakteur GELD-Magazin Das ist
  • Why Attorneys Who Invest in Their Clients in a Post-Enron World Are "Selling Out," Not "Buying In"

    Why Attorneys Who Invest in Their Clients in a Post-Enron World Are "Selling Out," Not "Buying In"

    Counselor, Gatekeeper, Shareholder, Thief: Why Attorneys Who Invest in Their Clients in a Post-Enron World Are "Selling Out," Not "Buying In" CHRISTINE HURT* In recent years, many corporate attorneys have tried to function not merely as legal adviser to their clients, but as business consultants to them, and even as investors in their enterprises. During the "Dot-Coin" boom of the late-1990s, this phenomenon led to the widespreadpractice of law firms taking equity in lieu of or in addition to, their traditionallegal fees. But when a corporate attorney's financial well-being becomes too closely tied to the success of a transaction in this way, her ability to exercise her independent professional judgment regarding the matter can be compromised. Recent financial scandals have aroused suspicion of the corporate world generally, and although public wrath has thus farfocused primarily on the misdeeds of accountants and investment analysts, scrutiny could turn next to the propriety of relationships between corporations and their attorneys. Professor Hurt argues that, at least in part because of the prevalent and questionablepractice of taking equity in lieu offees from a client, the legal profession is now susceptible to the embarrassmentof an Enron-like scandal. The authorfirst describes some of the ways that corporations have sought to structure legal fee arrangements so that their attorneys are more effective at achieving results beneficial to the corporation. Then the author examines traditional understandings of the corporate attorney-client relationship by focusing on the attorney's roles as transactional cost engineer, reputational intermediary, and gatekeeper. Next, the author shows how investing in a client adversely affects an attorney's attempts to fulfill each of these traditionalroles.
  • Buy the Rumor, Sell the Fact : 85 Maxims of Investing and What They Really Mean

    Buy the Rumor, Sell the Fact : 85 Maxims of Investing and What They Really Mean

    BUY THE RUMOR, SELL THE FACT This page intentionally left blank. BUY THE RUMOR, SELL THE FACT 85 Maxims of Investing and What They Really Mean Michael Maiello McGraw­Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufac­ tured in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copy­ right Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior writ­ ten permission of the publisher. 0­07­144225­1 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: 0­07­142795­3. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fash­ ion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw­Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please contact George Hoare, Special Sales, at george_hoare@mcgraw­hill.com or (212) 904­ 4069. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw­Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work.
  • Securities Analysts: Why These Gatekeepers Abandoned Their Post

    Securities Analysts: Why These Gatekeepers Abandoned Their Post

    Securities Analysts: Why These Gatekeepers Abandoned Their Post DAVID J. LABHART* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1037 I. WHAT CAUSED SELL-SIDE ANALYSTS TO MISS ENRON? ................. .. ... .. .. .. .. 1040 A. The Absence of Deterrencefrom Third Party Liability ........................... 1041 B. Confl icts of Interest ................................................................................. 1043 1. Investment Banking Conflicts .......................................................... 1044 2. Informational Conflicts ..................................................................... 1046 3. Lack of Incentive .............................................................................. 104 7 II. CURRENT REGULATIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON ANALYST INCENTIVES ......... 1051 A . Regulation FD ......................................................................................... 1052 B. Regulation A C ......................................................................................... 1054 C. Self-Regulatory Organizationsand the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ................... 1055 D . The Global Settlem ent ............................................................................. 1057 III. SUGGESTED REGULATIONS ............................................................................. 1058 C ONCLUSION ........................................................................................................1061 INTRODUCTION In