TurkJBot 28(2004)29-37 ©TÜB‹TAK

TheGenus L. ()withSpecialReferenceto HybridisationandBiodiversityinTurkey

AliA.DÖNMEZ HacettepeUniversity,FacultyofScience,DepartmentofBiology,06532-Beytepe/AnkaraTURKEY

Received:23.09.2002 Accepted:24.02.2003

Abstract: ThegenusCrataegus L.hasapproximately200speciesworldwide.However,thenumberofthespeciesisincreasedto 1200speciesbysometaxonomists.Traditionally,thegenusisplacedinthesubfamilyMaloideae anditiscloselyrelatedtothegenera M.Roem., L. and Lindl. Thelatestphylogeneticanalysisofthegenusshowsthatitisclosestto thegenus Lind. Crataegus isdividedinto40sectionsbyvarioustaxonomists.Thegeneticdiversitycentreofthesection Crataegus rangesfromTurkeytoIran.AccordingtofieldobservationsinTurkey,newdiversitycentresareproposed.Thelatest studiesonTurkishCrataegus speciesshowthattherearemorespeciesthanhithertoknown.Hybridisationiscommonbetweenthe Crataegus speciesinTurkeyandthebiogeographicdistributionsofthemandtheirparentsaregiven.Somefeaturesofthegenus, includingandpyrenesmorphology,pyrenesnumberandcolours,arepolymorphic.Polymorphismandhybridisationarethe mainreasonforabundanceofthesynonymsofthe Crataegus species.

KeyWords: Crataegus,Rosaceae,,Turkey

Crataegus L.’un(Rosaceae)Türkiye’dekiDurumu: BiyoçeflitlilikveMelezlenme

Özet: Crataegus L. cinsiyeryüzünde200kadartüresahiptir.Bununlabirliktebusayıbazıtaksonomistlertarafından1200’ekadar çıkarılmıfltır.Bucinseskidenberi altfamilyasıiçinekonmufl, Pyracantha M.Roem.,Mespilus L. veHesperomeles Lindl.’in yakıncinsleriolarakde¤erlendirilmifltir.Ensonyapılanfilogenetikanalizleregöre,Osteomeles Lindl. cinsinedahayakınoldu¤uortaya konmufltur.Crataegus çeflitliarafltırıcılartarafından40seksiyonabölünmüfltür.Buseksiyonlararasında Crataegus seksiyonunun genetikçeflitlenmemerkeziTürkiye’den‹ran’ado¤ruuzanır.Arazigözlemlerimizegöre,Türkiye’debazıyerlerinbucinsinçeflitlenme merkeziolaca¤ıdüflünülmektedir.Yaptı¤ımızarafltırmalarbucinsinTürkiye’debilinendendahafazlatürüoldu¤unugöstermektedir. Türkiye’deki Crataegus’lardamelezlenmeyaygınbirdurumdur.Tümtürlerinbiyoco¤rafikda¤ılıflıvemeleztürlerinataları belirtilerek,tartıflılmıfltır. Cinsinyaprakveçekirdekmorfolojisi,çekirdeksayısı,meyverengigibibazıözellikleripolimorf tur. Polimorfizimvemelezlenme,Crataegus türlerindebukadarçoksinonimolmasınınnedenlerindendir.

AnahtarSözcükler: Crataegus,Rosaceae,taksonomi,Türkiye

Introduction FloraCaucasica(Grossheim,1934)andtheFloraof Linnaeusrecognisedthegenera Crataegus L. (nine Turkey(Browicz,1972). species), Mespilus L. (sevenspecies), Pyrus L. (four Ihaveperformedaliteraturesurvey,conductedfield species)and L. (twospecies)inthesubfamily studiesandexaminedherbariumspecimensandhaveseen Maloideae (Linnaeus,1754;Robertsonetal.,1991). thatthetaxonomyof Crataegus isproblematicdueto Intragenericclassificationofthemaloidgenerahasbeen polymorphiccharacters,hybridisation,insufficient studiedindetailbyPhipps(1983a),Phippsetal.(1991) collectionsandlackoffieldobservations. andCampbelletal.(1990).Acomprehensive The Crataegus accountintheFloraofTurkey monographicstudyoftheAsiaticandEuropeanCrataegus recognises17species,onesubspeciesandthreevarieties specieswascarriedoutbyChristensen(1992)and (Browicz,1972).Thetaxonomictreatmentofthe includedtheTurkish Crataegus species.Thetaxonomic TurkishCrataegus speciesbyChristensen(1992)differs treatmentsontheTurkishtaxawerebasedonherbarium fromthatofBrowicz.Heaccepted19species,one specimensandsomepreviousliteraturerecords,suchas subspecies,andtwovarieties.Inaddition,hereported5

29 TheGenusCrataegus L.(Rosaceae)withSpecialReferencetoHybridisationandBiodiversityinTurkey

speciesasnewrecordsforTurkeyandhehasalso Habit:orpolycormic,andmostlyarmed. recentlydescribedtwonewspecies.Hechangedthe Therearetwotypesofthorn;thefirstoneissmalland statusof11speciesrecognisedbyBrowiczintheFloraof lacksleafandinflorescence,andthesecondoneisstout Turkeyeitherbyreducingintosynonymyorbymaking andbearsinflorescence.Shortthornpossiblyturnsto newcombinationsorstatus. stoutovertime.Bothtypesofthornareonallof Thegenus Crataegus hasbeendividedintomany somespecies.Toprepareanaccurateherbariumsheet sectionsandsubsectionsbyvariousauthorsinthelast bearingthorns,thornybranchesoftreesshouldbe century.Thesectionsweretreatedtaxonomicallyandall pruned. werereorganisedbyPhipps(1983a);oneofwhich,the Indumentum:Fivekindsofindumentumareseenon section Orientales ZabelexC.K.Schneid. sensu the Crataegus specimensinTurkey:(1)villous,(2) Christensen,ispresentinTurkey.Thenothosection lanate,(3)sericeous,(4)tomentoseand(5)appressed- Crataeguineae K.I.Chr. hasrecentlybeendescribedby pubescent.Hairsoftheusuallydecreaseduring Christensen(1992),thoughitisnotrepresentedin transitionfromfloweringstagetofruitingstage. Turkey. Leafandstipule:Bothleafandstipulecharactersare frequentlyusedinthetaxonomyofthegenusandthere MaterialsandMethods arethreetypesof(Smith&Phipps,1984; Dickinson,1986). Leavesofelongatedshoots :these Thespecimensusedinthisstudywerecollected developfromtheaxisofmainbranchesororiginatefrom fromdifferentpartsofTurkeyover8years.Materials theapexofpreviousyears’branchesonthesameplant. fromvariousherbariainbothTurkey(HUB,GAZI,VAN Leavesoftheelongateshootsarelargestononeofthe andANK)andEurope(P,JE,PR)werealsoexamined.To plantsandthereisnofloweronit.Similarly,stipulesof collectbothfloweringandfruitingmaterials,mostofthe theelongatedshootsarealsothemostrobustamongall localitieswerevisitedtwice.Observationsonhabitat,life stipulesofthesameplant.Theincisionisdeeperthanthat form,phenologyandsomemorphologicalfeatureswere oftheothers.Leavesofshortshoots:leavesappearbelow notedandphotographed. theinflorescenceandtheyshowvariationinshapeand TaxonomictreatmentsbyBrowicz(1972)and size.Thisvariationiscalledleafheteroplasty(Smith& Christensen(1992)ontheTurkish Crataegus taxaare Phipps,1984;Dickinson&Phipps,1986).Leafvariation quitedifferentfromoneanother.Inthisstudy,forthe isalsopresentonleavesofsterileshootsoftheshort taxonomyofCrataegus,thechangesmadebyChristensen shoot.Subterminalleavesoftheshortshootarea areexplainedundertherelatedspecies.Thetaxonomic characteristicandusefultaxonomiccharacter.Numberof treatmentofthegenusbasedonChristensen’srevision lobepairs,depthofdivision,andnumberofteetharealso andthesynonymsofthetaxaarenotgivenhere. commonlyused. Leavesofsterileshoots :similarto floweringshootsinbothshapeandsize,buttheseare clusteredonthetopoftheshortshoots. Results Inflorescence:Corymbs,rarelyumbel,terminalon Adetailedexaminationofthecollectedspecimens, floweringshoots.Thenumberofflowersinthe herbariummaterial,andliteraturesurveysshowthat21 inflorescencevariesfromafewto50. Crataegus Crataegus speciesgrownaturallyandtwospeciesgrowin pentagyna Waldst.andKit.exWilld. ischaracterisedby cultivationinTurkey.Allthespeciespresentinherbaria manyflowersamongtheotherCrataegus species.Bracts: orcollectedfromthefieldhavebeenexaminedandthe theirserration,glandsanddurationarefrequentlyused acceptedtaxonomicranksaregivenhere.Diagnostic fortaxonomicpurposes.Thebractsusuallyfalloffafter featuresofthespeciesandcomparisonsbetweenthe anthesis.Hence,theyshouldbeobservedinthefieldand revisionsbyBrowicz,Christensenandmyown keptinanenvelope. C.tanacetifolia (Poir.)Pers. is suggestionsarediscussedundertherelatedtaxa. characterisedbypersistentbractsandprominentglands. Thefollowingcharactersareusedindelimiting Flower:Five-merous,however,afewwith4,6 species: and7sepalsofC.ambigua C.A.Mey.exBacker havebeen

30 A.A.DÖNMEZ

collectedfromCentralAnatolia.Sepalsareindurateinthe Table1.Chromosomenumbersofthe Crataegus taxainTurkey. TurkishCrataegus speciesandarecommonlyreflexedor patent.Erectsepalsarecharacteristicfor C.microphylla Taxa Chromosomenumbers(x=17) C.Koch.C.orientalis M.Bieb. showsvariationintheerect C.tanacetifolia ? patentorreflexedsepals.However,theother Crataegus C.azarolus var. 2n(2x)=34 speciesusuallyhaveone-positionedsepals.Itsshape C.pontica 2n(4x)=68 changesslightlyfromspeciestospecies,butitisnot C.orientalis 2n(4x)=68 characteristicformanyspecies.Moreover,variousshapes C.pentagyna 2n(2x)=34 ofsepalareseeninthesameflowerandinflorescence. C.davisii ? Themaincolourforpetalsiswhite,butpinkishpetalsare C.meyeri 2n(3x)=51;2n(4x)=68 seeninC.rhipidophylla Gand.,whilecreamandgreenish C.caucasica 2n(3x)=51 petalsareseenin C.pentagyna.Stylenumberisclosely C.ambigua 2n(3x)=51 relatedtopyrenenumber,bothofwhicharevery C.heterophylloides ? importantforthetaxonomyoftheCrataegus speciesand C.longipes ? whichshouldbenotedinthefield.Thebasalpartofthe C.microphylla 2n=32;2n(2x)=34 styleishairyonfewspeciesofthegenus.Apicesofstyle C.rhipidophylla 2n(2x)=34;2n(3x)=51; haveenlargedsurfacesforpollination. 2n(4x)=68 Fruit:Thecolourofmaturefruitsisusedfor C.pseudoheterophylla 2n(3x)=51;2n(4x)=68 taxonomicpurposes.Yellow,redandblackarebasic C.monogyna 2n(2x)=34 coloursformaturefruits.However,therearealsomany C. xbornmuelleri ? intermediatecolours. C.azarolus L.,C.tanecetifolia and C.x yosgatica ? C. x bornmuelleri Zabel havevarioustonesofyellow C.x sinaica ? while C.pentagyna,C.davisii Browicz and C.caucasica C. x rubrinervis ? C.Koch areblack-fruitedspeciesinTurkey.Thefruitsof C. x browicziana ? therestofthespeciesareeitherredoryellowish-redor C.x kyrtostyla 2n(2x)=34;2n(4x)=68 varioustonesofred. Flesh:theediblepartoffruit betweentheskinandpyreneissometimesusedforthe identificationofsomespecies.Itisusuallypaleyellow,but HybridisationintheTurkishCrataegus species ifthefruitisblack,thenthefleshismostlyredanddark- red-veined. ThetaxonomictreatmentbyChristensenshowedthat 30%ofthespecieswerehybridinorigin(Table2).His Pyrenes:Thenumberofpyrenesisfrequentlyusedin judgementofhybridspecieswasbasedonlyon thetaxonomyofthegenus.Dorsalandventralsurfaces morphologicalfeatures.Noevidencefrommolecularor havegroovesthatareoftaxonomicimportance. cytologicalstudiessofaravailablesupportshybridisation. ChromosomecountsonTurkishCrataegus species Ontheotherhand,Iobservedthat C. x browicziana Basicchromosomenumberis(n)=17forthe K.I.Chr.andC. x bornmuellerihavefewflowersandfruit, Crataegus species(Gladkova,1968;Campbelletal., intwosuccessiveyears,whereas C.xyosgatica K.I.Chr. 1991).Additionally,mostofthespeciesarepolyploid. and C. x sinaica Boiss. havemanyflowersandfruits. Apomixisisacommonbreedingstrategyin Crataegus, Polyploidyisacommonphenomenonamongthe whichwouldresultinpolyploidy(Smith&Phipps, Crataegus species.Itscurrentknownrateofpolyploidyis 1988a,b;Campbelletal,1991;Well&Phipps1989). 60%inTurkey(Christensen,1992;IPCN,2002),(Table 1).Duetosomedifficultiesinstudyingthechromosome Floweringphenology morphologyofwoodyplantsincluding Rosaceae,Ihave Theflowerbearingperiodofatreerangesfrom1to notyetcompletedthechromosomecounts. 2weeksundernaturalconditionsinTurkey.Thetimeof Agamospermyandapomixisarecommonin Crataegus floweringisalmostspecies-specificanditiscontrolledby (Muniyama&Phipps,1983;Dickinson&Phipps,1986; environmentalconditions.One-andtwo-pyrenedspecies Dickinson&Campbell,1991;Campbelletal.,1991). (series Crataegus L.)ofthegenusblossomfirst.This

31 TheGenusCrataegus L.(Rosaceae)withSpecialReferencetoHybridisationandBiodiversityinTurkey

Table2.Hybridspeciesof Crataegus inthefloraofTurkey. SiberianandIrano-Turanianphytogeographicalregions. ItsdistributionareaalsoextendstoCentralAnatolia. Hybridspecies Parentspecies1 Parentspecies2 Localpopulationsarefoundcloseto Quercus scrubor C. xbornmuelleri C.orientalis C.tanacetifolia clearingareasofdeciduousscrub.Thespeciesprefers C. xyosgatica C.monogyna C.tanacetifolia relativelyhumidscrubbyareas.Itisadistinctspecies C. xsinaica C.azarolus C.monogyna taxonomically.Fruitsarecommonlyusedbylocalpeople C. xrubrinervis C.monogyna C.pentagyna asfood. C. xbrowicziana C.microphylla C.rhipidophylla 2- C.orientalis M.Bieb. Fl.taur.-caucas.1:387. C. xkyrtostyla C.monogyna C. rhipidophylla 1808,nonCrataegusorientalis(Poir.)BoscexDC. Type:U.S.S.R.,theCrimea, MarshallvonBieberstein groupincludesthespecies C.monogyna, Jacq. C. s.n. (lectotype:B-W9271-2,photo:C,isolectotypes:B- rhipidophylla and C.x sinaica Boiss. Inaddition,thereisa W9271-1,B-W9271-3,photos:C,HAL). variationintimebetweenthesespecies.Thespecieswith AccordingtoChristensen,thespeciesisdistributedin threetofivepyrenesbelongingtothe Orientales EasternAnatolia,CentralAnatoliaandsurroundingareas. (C.K.Schneid.)Pojark.seriesblossom1monthlaterthan Itisrepresentedbytwosubspecies,namelysubsp. thememberoftheseries Crataegus.Theseries orientalis andsubsp.szovitsii (Pojark.)K.I.Chr. inTurkey, Pentagyna (C.K.Schneid.) Russanovisrepresentedby C. and C.orientalis var. obtusata Browicz isreducedtoa pentagyna,whichblossomsbetweenthesetwogroups. synonym. C.orientalis prefersman-madehabitats, Accordingtomyfieldobservations,Crataegus species clearingareasinthesteppeandotheropenplaces.The specieshasmanylocaltypesandextremeforms.Fruits blossomedlatein2002,possiblybecauseoflower arecommonlyusedasfood. temperaturesinthewinterthaninthepreviousyear.Due totheverydiversetopographyTurkey,itisdifficultto 3- C. x bornmuelleri Zabel inBeissner,Schelle& collectallfloweringspecimensofthegenusinoneseason. Zabel,Handb.Laub-holzben.179.1903. Pharmacologicalactivitiesofthe Crataegus Type:Germany,cultivatedat“Forstakademie species Münden.”(Zabels.n.,JE!). Someimportantcompoundshavebeenobtainedfrom Thespeciesisahybridof C.orientalis and C. theleaves,flowersandfruitsofthespecies. C. tanacetifolia. Itisdistinguishedfrom C.orientalis by monogyna,C.oxyacantha L. and C.pentagyna were glandularbractsandfrom C.tanacetifolia bydeciduous extensivelystudiedfortheirpharmacologicalpeculiarities bractsonmaturefruit.Thedistributionpatternofthe (Meriçli,1989).Inadditiontothesespecies,C.orientalis, speciesissimilartothatof C.tanacetifolia ,butits distributionareaisnarrowerthanthatofthelatter.It C.tanacetifolia andC.monogyna werestudiedindetailin prefersrelativelyhumidhabitats. respecttoheartdisease(Meriçli&Ergezen,1994; Melikoglu&Meriçli,2000;Birmanetal.,2001). 4-C.azarolus L.Sp.Pl.477.1753. Flavonoidcompounds,oligomers,procyanidinsand Type:France.Herault,Montpellier,Maguelonne chardiotonicaminesarethemainchemicalcompounds Cathedral,Moullefarines.n. (neotype:CGE). usedforheartdisease. Thespeciesisrepresentedbytwovarieties,var. TurkishspeciesofCrataegus. aronia L. andvar. pontica (C.Koch)K.I.Chr.,inTurkey 1- C.tanacetifolia (Poir.)Pers. inSyn.Pl.2:38. accordingtoChristensen.Bothofthevarietieswere 1807. considereddifferentspeciesbyBrowicz(1972).Onthe otherhand,Browiczdescribedtwonewvarieties,namely Type:Mespilusorientalistanacetifoliovillosomagno var. dentata Browicz andvar. minuta Browicz,inthe fructopentagonoeviridiflavescente, Tourneforts.n. Crataegus accountoftheFloraofTurkey.Bothvarieties (holotype:P!;isotype:JE!). arereducedtoasynonymbyChristensen.Accordingto Thespeciesischaracterisedbypersistentbracts.The myownexaminationsofspecimensandfieldobservations speciesgrowswellinthetransitionzoneoftheEuro- thevar. minuta isdistinctfromtheothervarietiesof

32 A.A.DÖNMEZ

azarolus. Thespeciesoccursinthetransitionzoneofthe specimenscollectedfromthetypelocalityrevealthat C. MediterraneanandIrano-Turanianregions.Additionally, davisii isadifferentspeciesfrom C.pentagyna. itsdistributionareareachesSouth-eastAnatoliawiththe 7-Crataegusdavisii Browicz,NotesRy.Bot.Gard. exceptionofdrierMesopotamianplains. C.azarolus Edinburgh3:323.1972. formspurestandsinElazı¤province.Itisthemostxeric speciesinTurkey. Type:Turkey,Hakkari,fiemdinlitoYüksekova1650 m,Davis45168 (holotype:E,photo:W). 5- C.pontica C.Koch Verh.VereinsBeförd. Thisspecieswascollectedfromthetypelocalityand GartenbauesKönigl.Preuss.Staaten1:269.1853. itsenvirons.Itwasrecognisedasasynonymof C. Type:Turkey.Prov.Çoruh,inderNahevonArdanuç, pentagyna byChristensen.However,myobservationson Koch187(holotype:B,destroyed).Neotype,drawingof habitatandphenologyandexaminationsofthespecimens holotype,Figure6binPojarkova,1939b. showthattherearemanyprominentdifferencesbetween ThespecieshasbeenevaluatedunderC.azarolus asa them.Hence,Iregarditasadifferentspecies.However, varietybyChristensen.Thespecieswascollectedfrom furtherstudiesareneeded. Ardanuç(Artvin)anditdoesnothaveanabundant 8-C.meyeri Pojark. inKomarov,Fl.URSS9:500, populationthere.Itneedsfurthertaxonomicstudiesto FigureXXIX.3.1939. understanditsrelationshipwithC.azarolus. Type: U.S.S.R.,ArmeniainvicinitateurbisJerevan, 6- C.pentagyna Waldst.andKit.exWilld. Sp.Pl. infaucibusfl.Gjarni-czai,propemonasteriumGehart.11 2(2):1006.1800. Oct1936,Pojarkova792 (holotype:LE,photo:C). Type:Hungary/Yugoslavia.InDunatoetSyrmio, ThisspeciesisdistributedinCentralandEastAnatolia. (DanubeandSerbia), Kitaibels.n. (holotype:B-W9718, C.dikmensis isreducedtoasynonymofthisspecies. photos:C). SomespecimenscollectedfromAnkarabelongto C. dikmensis.However,furtherstudiesandexaminationsof Thisspeciesiseasilydistinguishedfromtheother typespecimensareneededfortaxonomicaccuracy. Crataegus speciesgrowinginTurkeybyitsrichflowered inflorescence, smallerflowers,5styles,blackfruitsand 9- C.caucasica C.Koch,Verh.VereinsBeförd. smallpyrenes.ThespeciesiscommonintheThracian, GartenbauesKönigl.Preuss.Staaten1:286.1853. centralandwesternBlackSearegions.C.davisii hasbeen Type:U.S.S.R.,Caucasus,Wilhelmss.n.(holotype:B, reducedtoasynonymof C.pentagyna byChristensen. destroyed,neotypeU.S.S.R.,Azerbaijan,Kirovabad, However,myfieldobservationsandexaminationsofthe Pojarkova288(LE).

123456789 42

A C.davisii C.ambigua C.xbornmuelleri C.rhipidophylla 40 C.orientalis C.pseduoheterophylla C.xrubrinervis C.tanacetifolia C.monogyna C.orientalis B C.microphylla C.meyeri C.rhipidophylla C.pentagyna C.xsinaica C.xbrowicziana C.longipes C.heterophylloides 38 C.pentagyna C.orientalis C.azarolus C.rhpidophylla C.meyeri C.ambigua C.monogyna C C.xsinaica C.rhipidophylla C.microphylla C.orientalis 0 100 200 36 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44

Figure1.Diversityareasofthegenus Crataegus inTurkey.

33 TheGenusCrataegus L.(Rosaceae)withSpecialReferencetoHybridisationandBiodiversityinTurkey

Thespeciesgrowsinnorth-eastTurkeyaccordingto Thisspecieshasbeenincludedin C.curvisepala Grosheim’smap,butitwasnotbeenrecordedinthe Lindman byBrowicz.ItiscommoninTurkeyandis FloraofTurkeybyBrowicz.Floweringandfruiting characterisedbyleafserrationandlobes.However,itis specimenswerecollectedfromI¤dırandanewlocalityin frequentlyconfusedwith C.monogyna.Therearemany Artvin. extremeformsofthisspecies. 10-C.ambigua C.A.Mey.exBacker,Bull.Soc.Imp. 15-C.pseudoheterophylla Pojark.inKomarov,Fl. NaturalistesMoscou31:12,34.1858. USSR9:507,FigureXXX.5.1939. Type:U.S.S.R.,Sarepta(KrasnoarmeiskiGorod), Type:U.S.S.R.,Armenia,distr.Jerevan,prope 24May1851, Beckers.n. (holotype:LE;isotype:LE, monasteriumGehart,infaucibusfl.Gjarni-czai,11Oct photos:C). 1936,Pojarkova793 (holotype:LE;isotype:LE). ThespecieswasrecordedbyBrowiczas C. atrosanguinea Pojark. Ithasbeencollectedfrommany C.pseudoheterophyllaPojark. C.turcomanica Pojark. localitiesinTurkeyandhasmanylocalpopulationswhich and C.turkestanica Pojark. havebeendescribedas aredifferentfromeachothermorphologically. differentspeciesbyPojarkova.Thesecondandthirdhave beenrecognisedassubspeciesof C.pseudoheterophylla 11-C.heterophylloides Pojark.exK.I.Chr. inRev.of byChristensen.Neitherofthesubspecieshavebeen Crataegus Sect.Crataegus andNothosect.Crataeguineae recordedintheFloraofTurkey.Somespecimens (Rosaceae-Maloideae) intheOldWorld.82,1992. collectedbytheauthorareattributedtothesevarieties. Type:Turkey,prov.Elazı¤,incollibuspr.Harput,Oct However,furtherstudiesareneededtoconfirmthe 1865,Haussknechts.n. (holotype:JE!). presenceofthesetaxainTurkey. IthasbeenrecentlydescribedfromTurkey(Elazı¤) 16- C.monogyna Jacq.,Fl.austriac.3:50,Table basedonpreviouslycollectedherbariummaterials.In 292.1775. additiontotypelocality,othercollectionshavebeen carriedoutfromMalatyaandtheadjacentregions.Fruits Type:Austria, Jacquins.n. (lectotypeBM; areblackandleafshapesarethemostprominentfeatures isolectotype:TO,photo:C). foridentification.Bothcharactershavevariationsand ThisspeciesiswidespreadinTurkey.Ithasbeengiven pureblack-fruitedmaterialhasnotbeencollectedyet. as C.monogyna var. monogyna andvar. azarella 12-C.longipes Pojark.,Novit.Syst.Pl.Vasc.1964a: (Grisebach)Koehne byBrowicz.Variety azarella is 171,Figure6.1964. reducedtoasynonymandthespecieshavebeengivenas Type:Turkey,Anatoliaorientalis,1890, Bornmueller var.monogyna andvar.lasiocarpa (Lange)K.I.Chr. Both s.n. (holotype:JE!). varietiesaregrowinginTurkeyaccordingtoChristensen. ThespecieswasdescribedfromTurkeyanditisalso Specimensofthemhavebeencollectedbyme. presentinSyria. 17-C. x yosgatica K.I.Chr. inRev.ofCrataegus Sect. 13- C.microphylla C.Koch,Verh.VereinsBeförd. Crataegus andNothosect. Crataeguineae (Rosaceae- GartenbauesKönigl.Preuss.Staaten1:288.1853,non Maloideae) intheOldWorld.121,1992. Crataegusmicrophylla Gand.,1871. Type:Turkey,prov.Yozgat,ca.27kmwestof Type:U.S.S.R.,Talish,admarginemsylvarum Akda¤madenialongSivas-Yozgatrd,1350m,13Jun propeLenkoran,1838, Hohenackers.n. (holotype:W; 1975,Browicz&Zielinski574(holotype:KOR;isotype: isotype:BM). KOR). ThespeciesiscommoninTurkey.Itischaracterised Thisspeciesisratherrareinthelocalitiesgivenas byerectsepalsinfruitandsmallerleaves. YozgatandTunceli.Thespecieswascollectedfrom 14-C.rhipidophylla Gand.,Bull.Soc.Bot.France18: relativelyhumidplacesin Quercus scrub.Christensen 447.1871. wrotethatdividedsepalsarecharacteristicforthe Type:France,Rhone,Liergues,alaCombe,2Oct species.However,Ihavecollectedotherspecieswith 1870,Gandoger3 (holotype:LY). dividedsepalsfromvariouslocalities.

34 A.A.DÖNMEZ

18-C. x sinaica Boiss.,Diagn.Pl.orient.2(2):48. Type:unknownlocality,Poirets.n.(lectotype:P-herb. 1856. Moquin-Tandon). Type:Egypt,SouthSinai,inpraeruptisSt.Catharinae, Thisspeciesiscommonlycultivatedforitsshowy 19May;11Aug1835, Schimper271&373 (lectotype: flowersingardensandparksinmajorcitiesinTurkey. G;isolectotypes:G,W). 23-C.crus-galli L.,Sp.Pl.476(1753). ThisspeciesiscommoninTurkeyanditslightly Type:notindicated. differsfrom C.rhipidophylla .Accordingtomyfield observationsandexaminationsofthespecimens,the C.crus-galli hasexaminedinalivingcollectioninthe thorn,withrecurvedtipisnotspecifictothishybrid AtatürkArboretumoftheForestryFacultyof‹stanbul species. University. 19- C. x rubrinervis Lange,Bot.Tidsskr.13:25. 1882-1883. Discussion Type:Denmark,cultivatedattheBotanicalGardenof Therehavebeenmanydifferenttaxonomic theUniversityofCopenhagen,20Oct1881, Langes.n. treatmentsofCrataegus andtherearestilldisagreements (holotype:C). aboutthetaxonomyofsomespecies.Many Crataegus Thespecieshasbeenrecordedfrom‹stanbul.The speciesarepolyploid.Grant(1971)explainsthe areawasvisitedseveraltimesandspecimenswere correlationbetweenpolyploidyandvariousfactors collectedatbothfloweringandfruitingstages.Fruitis includingclimate,latitude,elevation,typeofhabitat,life mainlypurpleordarkpurple,butnotpureblack. form,breedingsystem,hybridity,cellsize,chromosome size,chromosomestructure,sexchromosomemechanism 20- C. x browicziana K.I.Chr. inRev.of Crataegus andgenotype.Turkeyhasmanydiverseareasintermsof Sect.Crataegus andNothosect.Crataeguineae (Rosaceae- climate,latitudeandelevationtypeofhabitat.Each Maloideae) intheOldWorld.153,1992. Crataegus specieshasmanylocalpopulations,someof Type:Turkey,prov.Kütahya,KütahyatoEskiflehir, whichhavebeendescribedasnewtaxa. 900m,incalcareousgorge10-15kmnorthofKütahya; SomeregionsofTurkeyhavespecificclimateand 7Jully1962,Davis&Coode37,006 (holotype:E). habitatfortheCrataegus species.Theareashaveatleast Typelocalityanditssurroundingareashavebeen onecharacteristicspeciesandothersecondaryor widelysurveyed.Onlyonebushhasbeenfoundinthe commonspecieswithlocalvarieties.Theseareasare typelocality.C.xbrowicziana wouldbeanextremeform givenalongwiththeirinterestingfeaturesbelow(Figure 1). ofC.rhipidophylla. The‹stanbul-Boluregion:Thisareaischaracterised 21-C. x kyrtostyla Fingerh.,Linnaea4:379,Table byC. x rubrinervis,whichisahybridofC.monogyna and III.1.1829. C.pentagyna .Thetypelocalityofthespecieshasbeen Type:unknown;neotype:Luxembourg,a50mdela visitedseveraltimesandthereisnotanabundant frontierebelge,enfacedupontdeRomeldangesurla population.Thearea(Büyükdere-‹stanbul)isunderthreat Sure,11Aug1960,Lawalree11088 (BR). ofurbanisation.Lowaltitudesandhighhumidityare Thespeciesisahybridof C.monogyna and C. characteristicforthearea.Similarhabitatshavebeen rhipidophylla. AccordingtoChristensen,ithasbeen investigatedtofindanotherlocalityofthespecies. Unfortunately,thespecieshasnotbeenfoundyet.There recordedfromtheThracianregionofTurkey. aremanyrichpopulationsof C.microphylla,C. Unfortunately,Iwasunabletocollectitfromthelocality rhipidophylla, C.monogyna andC.pentagyna andtheir givenoranotherplaces.Furtherfieldandherbarium intermediateforms. studiesareneededforthespecies. TheKastamonu-Ankararegion :Thisareais 22-C.laevigata (Poir.)DC.,Prodr.2:630.1825. situatedinthetransitionzoneofthecentralpartofthe

35 TheGenusCrataegus L.(Rosaceae)withSpecialReferencetoHybridisationandBiodiversityinTurkey

BlackSeaandCentralAnatolia.Lowhumidityandscrub honeybeesandvariousinsectsarevectorsfortheir areasarebestfor C. x bornmuelleri,whichisthe pollination. characteristicspeciesofthearea.Therearescattered Hybridspeciesarecommoninthegenus Crataegus. specimensof C. rhipidophylla,C.monogyna and C. Lowerflowerandfruitsethavebeenobservedin C. x pentagyna.However, C.tanacetifolia andC.orientalis browicziana and C.x bornmuelleri.Thissituationmight flourishbetterandmanylocalpopulationsformpure beattributedtotheirhybridnature.Incontrast,hybrid stands. species,C.xsinaica andC.xyosgatica,havebothahigh TheKütahyaregion :Thisisasmallareacovering numberofflowersandfruitset.Althoughtheabundance Kütahyavilayetanditsenvirons,characterisedby C. x offlowersandfruitsetandothermorphological browicziana.Therearesomedeciduousscrubstands observationsprovideonlysomecluestothehybridorigin predominatedbymanyCrataegus species.C.microphylla, oftheplants,hybridisationandtheparentspeciesshould C.rhipidophylla, C.monogyna,C.x sinaica,C.pentagyna alsobedetectedbymoleculartechniques. andC.orientalis arefoundinthearea. Inspiteofthefactthattherehavebeenseveral TheSivas-Erzincan-Tunceliregion :Thisisa taxonomicstudiesonthe Crataegus species,some geographicallylargeanddiversearea.Itincludessome taxonomicproblemsremainunresolved.Therearefew steppeanddeciduousscrubbyareas.Characteristic taxonomicstudiesontheTurkish Crataegus speciesin speciesoftheregionare C.xyosgatica,C.longipes and comparisontothoseonEuropeanandAmericantaxa. C.heterophylloides.Inadditiontothesespecies,thearea ManynewtaxahavebeendescribedfromAsiaand isrichinothersecondary Crataegus species,suchas C. EuropebyPoiret,Koch,Gandoger,Cinovskis,Pojarkova microphylla,C.rhipidophylla, C.meyeri,C.xsinaica,C. andothers.TheRussiantaxonomistPojarkovadescribed ambigua, C.azarolus andC.orientalis. somespeciesfromTurkey(Pojarkova,1941).Manynew specieshavebeendescribedfromNorthAmericabyAshe, TheBitlis-Van-Hakkariregion :Theareais BeadleandSargent(Christensen,1992).Hence,the characterisedby Quercus and otherdeciduousscrub speciesnumberofthegenushasbeenincreasedto1200. species.Openplacesofthescrubandthesurrounding Nevertheless,acceptedspeciescurrentlynumberabout settlementsarerichin Crataegus species. C.davisii is 200andmanyofthedescribedspecieshavebeenreduced especiallycharacteristicofthearea.Inaddition, C. tosynonymsbylatertaxonomists. ambigua and C.meyeri bothhaverichpopulationsaround Duetopolymorphism,hybridisation,apomictic thesouthofVanLake. C.pseudoheterophylla and C. breedingstrategiesandotherreasons,thespeciesofthis orientalis arealsoseeninthearea. genusshowgreatvariationsinpopulations.Therefore, Many Crataegus specieshavesurvivedinman-made mostofthetaxadescribedbyformertaxonomistsshould habitatsorplacesclosetohumansettlements.Thereare beregardedassynonymsbecauseofthediversenatureof noCrataegus speciesgrowingeitherinthehighmountain thegenus. zoneorinforestsfarfromsettlementsinTurkey.During myfieldstudies,Iobservedthatthefruitsofthe Crataegus speciesareeatenbybirdsandsome Acknowledgements mammalians.Theseanimalsserveasvectorsinthe TheauthorthanksTUBITAK(TBAG-2304)forits distributionoftheCrataegus species.Ontheotherhand, financialsupportofthisstudy.

References BrowiczK(1972).Crataegus L.In:PHDavis(ed).FloraofTurkeyand CampbellCS&DickinsonTA(1990).Apomixis,Patternof theEastAegeanIslands 4:133-147.Edinburgh:Edinburgh MorphologicalVariation,andSpeciesConceptsinsubfam. UniversityPress. Maloideae (Rosaceae).SystBot 15:124-135. BirmanH,Tamerfi,Meliko¤luG&MeriçliAH(2001).Hypotensive CampbellCS,GreeneCW&DickinsonTA(1991).ReproductiveBiology ActivityofCrataegustanacetifolia.‹stanbulEczFakMec34:23- inSubfam.Maloideae(Rosaceae).SystBot 16:333-349. 25.

36 A.A.DÖNMEZ

ChristensenKI(1992).Revisionof Crataegus Sect. Crataegus and MuniyammaM&PhippsJB(1983).Studiesin Crataegus XI.Further Nothosect.Crataeguineae (Rosaceae-Maloideae)intheOldWorld. cytologicalevidencefortheoccurrenceofapomixisinNorth SystematicBotanyMonographs35,pp.199.USA. AmericanHawthorns,CanJBot 62:2316-2324. DavisPH.(1972). FloraofTurkeyandtheEastAegeanIslands, v.4. PojarkovaAI(1941). Crataegus L.In:KomarovVL&YuzepchukSV Edinburgh:EdinburghUniversityPress. (ed). FloraUSSR IX:317-356.MoscowandLeningrad: BotanicheskiiInstitutAkademiiNaukSSSR.(Translatedfrom DickinsonTA&PhippsJB(1986a).Studiesin Crataegus(Rosaceae: RussianbyIsraelProgramforScientificTranslations.Jerusalem Maloideae) XIV.TheBreedingSystemof Crataeguscrus-galli 1971). sensulatoinOntario.AmerJBot 73:116-130. PhippsJB(1983).Biogeographic,Taxonomic,andCladistic DickinsonTA(1986).TopodemedifferentiationinOntariotaxaof RelationshipsbetweenEastAsiaticandNorthAmerican Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae)leafmorphometricevidence. Crataegus.AnnMissouriBotGard 70:667-700. CanJBot 64:2738-2747. PhippsJB(1983a). Crataegus-Anomenclatorforsectionalandserial DickinsonTA&PhippsJB(1986b).Studiesin Crataegus (Rosaceae: names.Taxon 32:598-604. Maloideae)IX.Short-shootleafheteroblastyin Crataeguscrus- galli sensulato.CanJBot 62:1775-1780. PhippsJB,RobertsonKR,PhippsJB,RohrerJR&SmithPG(1991). Originandevolutionofsubfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae).SystBot DickinsonTA&CampbellCS(1991).PopulationStructureand 16:303-332. ReproductiveEcologyinthe Maloideae (Rosaceae).SystBot 16: 350-362. RobertsonKR,PhippsJB,RohrerJR&SmithPG(1991).Asynopsisof generainMaloideae (Rosaceae).SystBot 16:376-394. GladkovaVN(1968).Karyologicalstudiesonthegenera CrataegusL. and Medik.(Maloideae)asrelatedtotheirtaxonomy. SmithPG&PhippsJB(1984).Studiesin Crataegus (Rosaceae, BotZurn 53:1263-1273. Maloideae)IX.Short-leafheteroblastyin Crataeguscrus-galli sensulato,CanJBot 62:1775-1780. GrantV(1971). PlantSpeciation, pp.435.NewYorkandLondon: ColumbiaUniversityPress. SmithPG&PhippsJB(1988a).Studiesin Crataegus (Rosaceae, Maloideae)XV.PatternofMorphometricVariationin Crataegus GrossheimAA(1934).FloraKavkasa.v.4:39-44.Baku. seriesRotundifoliae inOntario,SystBot13:97-106. IPCN-IndextoPlantChromosomeNumbers(2002). SmithPG&PhippsJB(1988b).Studiesin Crataegus (Rosaceae, http://mobot.mobot.org/cgi-bin/search_vast. Maloideae)XIX.BreedingbehaviorinOntario Crataegus series th LinnaeusC(1754). GeneraPlantarum .5 ed.,pp.213-214. Rotundifoliae,CanJBot 66:1914-1923. Stockholm. WellsTC&PhippsJB(1989).Studiesin Crataegus (Rosaceae, MelikogluG&MeriçliAH(2000). Flavonoidsof Crataegus stevenii. Maloideae)XX.Interserialhybridizationbetween Crataegus Pharmazie 55:326. monogyna (series Oxyacanthae)and Crataeguspunctata (series MeriçliAH(1989). Crataegus (Alıç)TürlerininKimyasalBilefliklerive Punctata) insouthernOntario,CanJBot 67:2465-2472. FarmakolojikEtkileri.Pharmacia-JTPA 29:63:26-30. MeriçliAH&ErgezenK(1994).Flavonoidsof Crataegustanacetifolia (Lam.)Pers.(Rosaceae)anEndemicSpeciesfromTurkey.Scientia Pharmaceutica 62:277-281.

37