The UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights The UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) Nineteenth Report of Session 2005-06 Volume II Oral and Written Evidence Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 18 May 2006 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 18 May 2006 HL Paper 185-II HC 701-II Published on 26 May 2006 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.50 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current Membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Campbell of Alloway Mary Creagh MP (Labour, Wakefield) Lord Judd Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Lord Plant of Highfield Abingdon) Baroness Stern Dan Norris MP (Labour, Wansdyke) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses. The Lords Committee has power to agree with the Commons in the appointment of a Chairman. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Joint Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the two Houses. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/commons/selcom/hrhome.htm. Current Staff The current staff of the Committee are: Nick Walker (Commons Clerk), Ed Lock (Lords Clerk), Murray Hunt (Legal Adviser), Jackie Recardo (Committee Assistant), Pam Morris (Committee Secretary) and Tes Stranger (Senior Office Clerk). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to The Clerk of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Committee Office, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2467; the Committee=s e-mail address is [email protected]. The UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) Oral Evidence Page Monday 21 November 2005 Mr Ben Ward, Special Counsel, Human Rights Watch Ms Carla Ferstman, Director, REDRESS and Mr Livio Zilli, Researcher, Amnesty International Ev 1 Wednesday 7 December 2005 Ms Jane Winter, Director, British Irish Rights Watch and Ms Aideen Gilmore, Research and Policy Officer, Committee on the Administration of Justice Ev 19 Monday 6 March 2006 Ms Harriet Harman QC MP, Minister of State Baroness Ashton of Upholland, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State and Mr John Kissane, Head of Human Rights Compliance and Delivery, Department for Constitutional Affairsl Ev 30 Mr Keir Starmer QC and Ms Jane Gordon, Human Rights Advisers to the Northern Ireland Policing Board Ev 40 Wednesday 8 March 2006 Mr Shaun Woodward MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office Chief Constable Sir Hugh Orde, Assistant Chief Constable Peter Sheridan and Assistant Chief Constable Duncan McCausland, Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) Ev 45 Monday 27 March 2006 Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces Lieutenant General R V Brims CBE DSO, Commander Field Army and Dr Roger Hutton, Director, Joint Commitments Policy, Ministry of Defence Ev 60 6 The UN Convention Against Torture Written Evidence Government & Public Bodies 1 Response by the United Kingdom to Recommendations by the United Nations Committee Against Torture following its examination of the United Kingdom’s 4th Periodic Report on 17/18 November 2004 dated 20 April 2006 Ev 68 2 Letter from the Chair to Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC MP, Minister of State for Constitutional Affairs, Department for Constitutional Affairs Ev 83 3 Letter from Baroness Ashton of Upholland, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs Ev 85 4 Further evidence to the Department for Constitutional Affairs Ev 87 5 Letter from the Chair to Chief Constable Sir Hugh Orde, Police Service of Northern Ireland, re Use of AEPs Ev 88 6 Letter from Chief Constable Sir Hugh Orde, Police Service of Northern Ireland, re Use of AEPs Ev 88 7 Letter from Keir Starmer QC, Doughty Street Chambers, re Use of AEPs Ev 89 8 Letter from Mrs Nuala O’Loan, Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, re Use of AEPs Ev 89 9 Letter from the Chair to Shaun Woodward MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office Ev 90 10 Letter from Mr Shaun Woodward MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland Office Ev 90 11 Letter from the Chair to Rt Hon Jack Straw MP, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, re Extraordinary Renditions Ev 91 12 Letter from Rt Hon Jack Straw MP, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, re Extraordinary Renditions Ev 91 13 Letter from the Chair to Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Ministry of Defence Ev 95 14 Letter from Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Ministry of Defence Ev 96 15 Further letter from Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Ministry of Defence Ev 103 16 Further letter from Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Ministry of Defence Ev 104 17 Memorandum from Rt Hon Adam Ingram MP, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, Ministry of Defence, further to oral evidence session of 27 March 2006 Ev 104 Other Organisations 18 Submission from Amnesty International Ev 105 19 Submission from British Irish Rights Watch Ev 110 20 Further submission from British Irish Rights Watch, re Extraordinary Renditions Ev 138 21 Submission from the Committee on the Administration of Justice Ev 141 22 Submission from Human Rights Watch Ev 145 23 Submission from Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) Ev 150 24 Joint submission from JUSTICE and Liberty on UNCAT Ev 153 25 Further joint submission from JUSTICE and Liberty on UK involvement in Extraordinary Renditions Ev 159 26 Submission from Kurdish Human Rights Project Ev 169 27 Submission from the Law Society Ev 170 28 Submission from the Redress Trust Ev 177 29 Further submission from the Redress Trust on the alleged use of UK airports in extraordinary renditions Ev 181 30 Submission from The 1990 Trust Ev 185 Individuals 31 Submission from Peter Kinderman, Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, re Psychological Torture Ev 188 32 Submission from Michelle Pratley Ev 189 335839PAG2 Page Type [SO] 22-05-06 22:58:27 Pag Table: COENEW PPSysB Unit: PAG2 Joint Committee on Human Rights: Evidence Ev 1 Oral evidence Taken before the Joint Committee on Human Rights on Monday 21 November 2005 Members present: Mr Andrew Dismore, in the Chair Bowness, L Mary Creagh Lester of Herne Hill, L Dan Norris Stern, B Mr Richard Shepherd Mr Douglas Carswell Witnesses: Mr Ben Ward, Special Counsel, Human Rights Watch, Ms Carla Ferstman, Director, REDRESS and Mr Livio Zilli, Researcher, Amnesty International, examined. Q1 Chairman: Welcome everybody. This is the first are in fact part of the same obligation and there is of our evidence sessions on UK compliance with no distinction between them, and in fact if there is the UN Convention Against Torture, and we have going to be an eVective international system for the three witnesses today: Mr Zilli from Amnesty prevention of torture it is absolutely critical that the International, Mr Ward from Human Rights states recognise that their obligation in relation to Watch and Ms Ferstman from REDRESS. First of torture does not stop with not torturing people all, thank youall for coming. What I wouldlike to themselves, but extends to their relations with other do is start oV with a general question and perhaps states and the actions they take that indirectly may this is best addressed in the first instance to Mr expose people to that risk. Ward. What is your overall view of UK compliance Mr Zilli: I would like to briefly thank the with the Convention Against Torture and where do Committee for having given this opportunity to youthink the di Yculties are to be found? Is it in Amnesty to address youon this subject,this very the legal structures, in Government policy or just important inquiry you are conducting. I would like in the practical treatment of detainees? to underscore what Ben has just said and I think Mr Ward: It seems to me that what we can observe that the Convention Against Torture as the in UK Government policy in respect of torture over primary instrument internationally makes it very the past several years is a kind of divergence and clear that the prohibition itself—which of course a sense that actually the obligation that the UK has has been recognised by the House of Lords and in respect of torture has a hard part and a soft part. many other judicial and other bodies to have the The hard part is that the UK has a clear obligation character of encompassing an erga omnes not to carry out any actions itself that would result obligation on governments—consists of a whole in torture, so it must not torture detainees, it must host of duties.
Recommended publications
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard No. 2, 2002 TUESDAY, 12 MARCH 2002 FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIRST PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET The Journals for the Senate are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/work/journals/index.htm Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard SITTING DAYS—2002 Month Date February 12, 13, 14 March 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 May 14, 15, 16 June 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 August 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 September 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26 October 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24 November 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21 December 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on the following Parliamentary and News Network radio stations, in the areas identified. CANBERRA 1440 AM SYDNEY 630 AM NEWCASTLE 1458 AM BRISBANE 936 AM MELBOURNE 1026 AM ADELAIDE 972 AM PERTH 585 AM HOBART 729 AM DARWIN 102.5 FM SENATE CONTENTS TUESDAY, 12 MARCH Distinguished Visitors........................................................................................... 509 Questions Without Notice— Health: Program Funding ................................................................................ 509 New Tax System.............................................................................................. 509 Health: Program Funding ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Book About Terror and Terrorism
    THINKING ABOUT TERRORISM: The Threat to Civil Liberties in a Time of National Emergency Michael E. Tigar thinkingaboutterror.odt, 7/9/2011, page 1 Dedication To my family Author’s Note Material in this book has previously appeared, although with major changes, in Law & the Rise of Capitalism (2d ed. 2000), Fighting Injustice (2002), and in lectures and speeches I have delivered to academic and bar audiences. I have been greatly assisted by Natalie Hirt, a law student at Duke, and by Jennifer Dodenhoff and Maria del Cerro, law students at Washington College of Law. Jane Tigar contributed ideas and sources on issues of executive power. The law libraries at Duke and WCL provided valuable assistance. In footnotes, I have tried to direct the reader to source materials on which I relied. In more than fifty years of writing and speaking on these topics, I cannot with confidence represent that I have acknowledged all the people and works that have influenced me. Many of the ideas here are based on being privileged to represent clients engaged in seeking social change; to them, a special thank you. thinkingaboutterror.odt, 7/9/2011, page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication Author’s Note Foreword – Two Kinds of Terrorism PART ONE: STATE-SPONSORED TERRORISM AND ITS PERPETRATORS Defining Terrorism – History, Logic, France and Mark Twain How to Judge State-Sponsored Terror – Where to Stand and What to Do Judicial Proceedings – Letelier-Moffitt Judicial Proceedings – Pinochet, not Kissinger Judicial Proceedings – the French Cases Reconciliation, Amnesty,
    [Show full text]
  • N.S.A. Able to Foil Basic Safeguards of Privacy on Web - Nytimes.Com
    N.S.A. Able to Foil Basic Safeguards of Privacy on Web - NYTimes.com http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/us/nsa-foils-much-internet-encryp... HOME PAGE TODAY'S PAPER VIDEO MOST POPULAR U.S. Edition Try a Digital Subscription Log In Register Now Help Search All NYTimes.com U.S. WORLD U.S. N.Y. / REGION BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE HEALTH SPORTS OPINION ARTS STYLE TRAVEL JOBS REAL ESTATE AUTOS POLITICS EDUCATION TEXAS N.S.A. Able to Foil Basic Safeguards of Privacy on Web Log in to see what your friends are sharing Log In With Facebook on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | What’s By NICOLE PERLROTH , JEFF LARSON and SCOTT SHANE This? Published: September 5, 2013 1466 Comments The National Security Agency is winning its long-running secret war FACEBOOK What’s Popular Now on encryption, using supercomputers, technical trickery, court orders TWITTER On Syria Vote, Doug Stanhope’s and behind-the-scenes persuasion to undermine the major tools Trust, but Verify ‘Beer Hall GOOGLE+ Putsch,’ a protecting the privacy of everyday communications in the Internet Stand-Up Album SAVE age, according to newly disclosed documents. E-MAIL Enlarge This Image The agency has circumvented or SHARE cracked much of the encryption, or MOST E-MAILED MOST VIEWED PRINT digital scrambling, that guards global 1. Harvard Business School Case Study: commerce and banking systems, REPRINTS Gender Equity protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the 2. 3 Quiet Museums in Rome e-mails, Web searches, Internet chats and phone calls of Associated Press Americans and others around the world, the documents This undated photo released by the show.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Communication Ethics in Social Conflict: Nonviolent and Christian Perspectives a Dissertation Submitt
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COMMUNICATION ETHICS IN SOCIAL CONFLICT: NONVIOLENT AND CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY RUSSELL P. JOHNSON CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2019 © 2019 by Russell Paul Johnson All Rights Reserved Table of Contents Acknowledgments..........................................................................................................................v Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Audiences .................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter Outline............................................................................................................................ 9 1. The Three Voices in the Ethics of Communication ............................................................. 14 I. The Etiquette of Democracy: Stephen L. Carter on Civility .................................................. 15 II. Realistic Radical: Saul Alinsky on Victory .......................................................................... 20 III. Being Just a Listener: Sally Miller Gearhart on Open-mindedness .................................... 25 IV. The Limits of Open-mindedness ......................................................................................... 30 V. The State of the Debate ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism, Risk and the Global City
    Terrorism, Risk and the Global City Towards Urban Resilience Jon Coaffee TERRORISM, RISK AND THE GLOBAL CITY This page has been left blank intentionally Terrorism, Risk and the Global City Towards Urban Resilience JON COAFFEE Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, UK © Jon Coaffee 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Jon Coaffee has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Coaffee, Jon. Terrorism, risk and the global city : towards urban resilience. -- Rev. ed. 1. City planning--England--London. 2. Terrorism--England-- London--Prevention. 3. City planning--Political aspects. 4. Terrorism--Prevention. I. Title 307.1'216'09421-dc22 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Coaffee, Jon. Terrorism, risk and the global city: towards urban resilience / by Jon Coaffee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7546-7428-3 (hardcover) -- ISBN 978-0-7546-9046-7 (ebook) 1. City planning--England--London. 2. Terrorism--England--London--Prevention. 3. City and town life--England--London--Psychological aspects. 4. Public buildings--Security measures-- England--London. 5. Crime prevention and architectural design--England--London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unconstitutionality of Government Propaganda
    The Unconstitutionality of Government Propaganda CAROLINE MALA CORBIN Government propaganda—the government’s deliberate dissemination of false claims on matters of public interest—has increasingly become a source of concern in the United States. Not only does the current presidential administration disseminate propaganda at a rate unprecedented in the modern era, so that Americans now live in an age of government-created “alternative facts,” but the internet and social media have made it possible to find receptive audiences with alarming speed and accuracy. This surge of government propaganda poses troubling questions for the health of our democracy, which requires political accountability and the valid consent of the governed to thrive. Although the crucial role that speech plays in our democratic self-rule is a major reason it merits First Amendment protection, the Free Speech Clause as currently interpreted has no part to play in combating government propaganda. Under the government speech doctrine, the Free Speech Clause does not apply to government speech, including government propaganda. It is time to revisit that conclusion. This Article argues that government propaganda, although government speech, ought to be regarded as covered by, and in violation of, the Free Speech Clause. Admittedly, this proposal is radical for two reasons. First, with few exceptions, the free speech tradition in the United States is averse to regulating harmful speech. Such regulations are believed to invite government abuse and to chill private speech. However, neither of these concerns are triggered when the government is the object rather than the enforcer of speech regulations. The second radical aspect of this proposal is bringing government speech into the purview of the Free Speech Clause.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Security, Privacy, Data Protection and Other Human Rights: Technologies and Legal Principles Law, Governance and Technology Series
    Law, Governance and Technology Series Sub-series: Issues in Privacy and Data Protection 37 Olga Mironenko Enerstvedt Aviation Security, Privacy, Data Protection and Other Human Rights: Technologies and Legal Principles Law, Governance and Technology Series Issues in Privacy and Data Protection Volume 37 Series editors Pompeu Casanovas, Barcelona, Spain Giovanni Sartor, Florence, Italy Serge Gutwirth, Brussels, Belgium Issues in Privacy and Data Protection aims at publishing peer reviewed scientific manuscripts that focus upon issues that engage into an analysis or reflexion related to the consequences of scientific and technological developments upon the private sphere, the personal autonomy and the self-construction of humans with data pro- tection and privacy as anchor points. The objective is to publish both disciplinary, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary works on questions that relate to experiences and phenomena that can or could be covered by legal concepts stemming from the law regarding the protection of privacy and/or the processing of personal data. Since both the development of science and technology, and in particular information tech- nology (ambient intelligence, robotics, artificial intelligence, knowledge discovery, data mining, surveillance, etc.), and the law on privacy and data protection are in constant frenetic mood of change (as is clear from the many legal conflicts and reforms at hand), we have the ambition to reassemble a series of highly contempo- rary and forward-looking books, wherein cutting edge issues
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Blount, T,. (2018) “Modelling Eristic and Rhetorical Argumentation on the Social Web”, University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, PhD Thesis, [pagination]. Data: Author (Year) Title. URI [dataset] UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Electronics and Computer Science Modelling Eristic and Rhetorical Argumentation on the Social Web by Tom Blount Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Electronics and Computer Science Doctor of Philosophy MODELLING ERISTIC AND RHETORICAL ARGUMENTATION ON THE SOCIAL WEB by Tom Blount Argumentation, debate and discussion are key facets of human communication, shaping the way people form, share and promote ideas, hypotheses and solutions to problems. Argumenta- tion can broadly be broken down into collaborative problem solving or truth-seeking (dialectic argumentation) and quarrelling without hope for a resolution, either aggressively or for the pur- pose of recreation, catharsis or entertainment (eristic argumentation).
    [Show full text]
  • Talking About Terrorism
    Talking about Terrorism Risks and Choices for Human Rights Organisations International Council on Human Rights Policy The International Council on Human Rights Policy was established in Geneva in 1998 to conduct applied research into current human rights issues. Its research is designed to be of practical relevance to policy-makers in international and regional organisations, in governments and inter-governmental agencies, and in voluntary organisations of all kinds. The Council is independent, international in its membership, and participatory in its approach. It is registered as a non- profit foundation under Swiss law. Cover illustration © The Trustees of the British Museum.The Milky Way, 1968, detail. Joichi Hoshi, 1913-1979. Coloured woodblock print. Talking about Terrorism – Risks and Choices for Human Rights Organisations The International Council thanks the British Department for International Development (DFID); CAFOD, United Kingdom; the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAE), Switzerland; the Ford Foundation, United States; the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); and an anonymous donor, for their contribution to this project. Talking about Terrorism – Risks and Choices for Human Rights Organisations © 2008 International Council on Human Rights Policy © 2008 International Council on Human Rights Policy 48, chemin du Grand-Montfleury, P. O. Box 147, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland. Talking about Terrorism – Risks and Choices for Human Rights Organisations, 2008. International Council on Human Rights Policy. Versoix, Switzerland. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • March 6 2012 Compilation
    March 6, 2012 The Inconvenient Truths Series #10: Lest We Forget Hello Every One! I owe you all an explanation as to why you've not received any compilation from me since November 27, 2011. Here is why through the following email reply I did yesterday... Bruce Vinikas ([email protected]) asked me: "What happened to the Earth Rainbow Network compilations? They just stopped last November. Thousands of people over 10 years received those, passed them on. They served as a powerful resource during the critical Bush and Obama years. They MADE A DIFFERENCE. Will you RESTART the compilations ever?" And my reply was (in part) "I've been Hyper busy with launching a coalition against smart meters and electromagnetic pollution here in Quebec - check the French website I've created at http://www.cqlpe.ca. I published 8 large French bulletins, organized with others a demo last Feb 5 in 3 cities against those meters and struggled to work on my book translation through all this. Had almost a burn out. So managing the Meditation Focuses - which I translate in French every week now while I also process (network and archive) the Portuguese version of these weekly Meditation Focuses in addition to the English one - is all I could do." Later Bruce added: "If I'd known you were going to post my comments I would have poured my heart out. I can't say enough about the work you did for those years AND what I hope you will continue to do. For example, after receiving your compilations for a few years I realized it was a powerful venue so I started my own.
    [Show full text]