Alexander Scriabin: Aesthetic Development Through Selected Piano Works by Nuno Cernadas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alexander Scriabin: Aesthetic Development Through Selected Piano Works by Nuno Cernadas Alexander Scriabin: Aesthetic Development through Selected Piano Works By Nuno Cernadas Master Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Music Hochschule für Musik Freiburg March 2013 2 I give full flowering to each feeling, each search, each thirst. I raise you up, legions of feelings, pure activity, my children. I raise you, my complicated, unified feelings, and embrace all of you as my one activity, my one ecstasy, bliss, my last moment. I am God. I raise you up, and I am resurrected, and then I kiss you and lacerate you. I am spent and weary, and then I take you. In this divine act I know you to be one with me. I give you to know this bliss, too. You will be resurrected in me, the more I am incomprehensible to you. I will ignite your imagination with the delight of my promise. I will bedeck you in the excellence of my dreams. I will veil the sky of your wishes with the sparkling stars of my creation. I bring not truth, but freedom.1 Alexander Scriabin 1 Scriabin’s Notebooks, quoted in: Bowers, Faubion. The New Scriabin: Enigma and Answers. Newton Abbot London: David & Charles, 1974, p.115-116. 3 4 5 Acknowledgements I would like to express my profound gratitude to the Coordinator of the present Thesis, Prof. Dr. Ludwig Holtmeier, for all his support and scientific advice. I would also like to convey my appreciation to Prof. Hans Fuhlbom and Prof. Gilead Mishory of the Hochschule für Musik Freiburg, and to Prof. Dina Yoffe, for bringing me to a closer and better comprehension of Scriabin’s music. I also thank Prof. Fátima Travanca, with whom I first studied Scriabin’s piano music, for sparking my interest in music in general and for introducing me to the music of this wonderful composer. Finally, I would like to dedicate this work to my parents Josefina and Eduardo. I am deeply thankful for their love and trust and their belief in my work and character, and for always having encouraged my wish to pursue a career in music. Without their efforts, it would not have been possible to materialize this thesis. 6 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 7 BIOGRAPHY OF THE COMPOSER .......................................................... 10 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EARLY PERIOD .............................. 23 Sonata No.3 in F sharp minor, op.23 ..................................................... 25 I – Drammatico ...................................................................................... 27 II – Allegretto ......................................................................................... 35 III – Andante .......................................................................................... 39 IV – Presto con fuoco ............................................................................. 45 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MIDDLE PERIOD ........................... 55 Quatre Morceaux op.51 ......................................................................... 57 Fragilité ................................................................................................. 59 Prélude .................................................................................................. 63 Poème ailé ............................................................................................. 66 Danse Languide ..................................................................................... 71 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LATE PERIOD ................................ 76 Vers la Flamme, Poème op.72 ............................................................... 78 FINAL REMARKS .................................................................................... 91 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................................................................................... 93 7 Introduction The music of Alexander Scriabin has a magical quality that has captivated the imagination of the public for generations. The first piano pieces have inherent a certain freshness (almost naiveté) and a simplicity of musical expression that fascinates every listener, through their beauty and ingenuity. Although these works are tremendously inspired by Chopin, Scriabin does not copy the polish master but rather takes inspiration from his sound world in order to create his own poetic voice. As one dwells over Scriabin’s work, going progressively deeper into his middle and late periods, it becomes apparent an ever-growing crystallization and sophistication of the composer’s ideas and principles. Hence, the middle period serves as a transitional étage for the clarification of Scriabin’s musical thought and is the critical moment of his musical development. It is a period of self-searching, deepening of concepts, progressive construction of a musical formula in which he would later swim freely. The final period is the consolidation of his art. It corresponds to the production of a self-confident master, finally achieving the tightly bond structure that allows for unique and effortless musical expression. This is his most original period, for it is during this phase that Scriabin claims the right to be inscribed in Music History books, as one of the most visionary and imaginative composers of all time. This noticeable evolution of Scriabin’s aesthetics and musical thought brings about two very important questions: • What caused it? • In which ways is this development recognizable in his music? The present thesis attempts to answer these problems in a manner that mixes both concrete analytical terminology and the subjective opinions of its author. It tries, however, not to fall into hermetical analytical concepts but rather provide them as a support for the conclusions that the author hopes to be musically clarifying. 8 It is the author’s opinion that there is much more to Scriabin’s music than just the explanation of the Mystic chord or the harmonic developments that his music brought about. This thesis does not intend to explain in detail the development of either the harmonic, melodic, rhythmical or philosophical dimensions of Scriabin’s music, but uses each one of these perspectives as means to enlighten the evolution of the musical thought. In order to provide answers for the above-mentioned first question, the author decided to present a biography of the composer, hoping that the insight on Scriabin’s private, social and spiritual life may bring forth a better contextualization of the internal and external conditions in which Scriabin’s oeuvre was brought to life. To answer the second question, the author elected three significant works of Scriabin’s piano production, each one belonging to a different period of his musical creation. These will serve as musical examples to prove Scriabin’s creative evolution, since each of these compositions is a superlative representative of the qualities that are idiomatic to the corresponding period, while simultaneously containing features that are transversal to the composer’s whole production. The selected piano works are: • Piano Sonata No.3 in F sharp minor, op.23 - Early Period • Quatre Morceaux (Four Pieces), op.51 - Middle Period • Poème “Vers la Flamme”, op.72 - Late Period The author will focus on the analysis of each of these works, considering their different dimensions. He will try to show each piece’s inspiration and compositional procedures as well as their philosophical content in an attempt to faithfully portray the similarities and differences between them. This comparison will, hopefully, allow for a clearer recognition of the aesthetical development of Scriabin’s music. 9 By recognizing the new musical possibilities opened up by Scriabin, the author must adapt his analytical techniques for a better understanding of each of these very different works. In this sense, and although the analysis of the Third Sonata op.23 focuses itself entirely in tonal principles (however filled with a characteristic fin de siècle chromaticism), the author’s approach to Quatre Morceaux and especially to Vers la Flamme had to mix different analytical components, in order to portray a more accurate and clarified perspective. These consist of the traditional musical analysis rooted on tonality as well as the so called “pitch-class set theory”, which the author considered very useful to classify some of the atonal structures present in Scriabin’s later music, and also as a labeling device with which Scriabin’s harmonies could be more immediately distinguishable. 10 Biography of the Composer As he liked to say, Scriabin came from a “(…) noble and military family. Indeed, his was an aristocratic family, with roots going as deep as the thirteen century.” 2 All of his male relatives on his father’s side had careers in the military. His father, Nikolai Alexandrovich Scriabin (1849-1914), avoided this tradition and studied Law instead at the Moscow University as well as Oriental Languages in Petersburg, granting him the possibility of being sent as an official interpreter to the Russian Embassy in Constantinople.3 Alexander Scriabin’s mother, Lyubov Petrovna Shchetinina (1849-1873), was a concert pianist and one of the first Russian female professional musicians. She took her diploma with honors in the Petersburg Conservatory (she was awarded the Great Gold Medal) in 1867. Her teacher was Theodor Leschetizky,4 Europe’s most notable piano pedagogue at the time, a man who taught Ignaz Friedman, Arthur Schnabel and Benno Moiseiwitsch, among other great pianists. She was a frequent
Recommended publications
  • Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-7-2018 12:30 PM Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse Renee MacKenzie The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Nolan, Catherine The University of Western Ontario Sylvestre, Stéphan The University of Western Ontario Kinton, Leslie The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Music A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Musical Arts © Renee MacKenzie 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Music Performance Commons Recommended Citation MacKenzie, Renee, "Rachmaninoff's Piano Works and Diasporic Identity 1890-1945: Compositional Revision and Discourse" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5572. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5572 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This monograph examines the post-exile, multi-version works of Sergei Rachmaninoff with a view to unravelling the sophisticated web of meanings and values attached to them. Compositional revision is an important and complex aspect of creating musical meaning. Considering revision offers an important perspective on the construction and circulation of meanings and discourses attending Rachmaninoff’s music. While Rachmaninoff achieved international recognition during the 1890s as a distinctively Russian musician, I argue that Rachmaninoff’s return to certain compositions through revision played a crucial role in the creation of a narrative and set of tropes representing “Russian diaspora” following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachmaninoff's Early Piano Works and the Traces of Chopin's Influence
    Rachmaninoff’s Early Piano works and the Traces of Chopin’s Influence: The Morceaux de Fantaisie, Op.3 & The Moments Musicaux, Op.16 A document submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in the Division of Keyboard Studies of the College-Conservatory of Music by Sanghie Lee P.D., Indiana University, 2011 B.M., M.M., Yonsei University, Korea, 2007 Committee Chair: Jonathan Kregor, Ph.D. Abstract This document examines two of Sergei Rachmaninoff’s early piano works, Morceaux de Fantaisie, Op.3 (1892) and Moments Musicaux, Opus 16 (1896), as they relate to the piano works of Frédéric Chopin. The five short pieces that comprise Morceaux de Fantaisie and the six Moments Musicaux are reminiscent of many of Chopin’s piano works; even as the sets broadly build on his character genres such as the nocturne, barcarolle, etude, prelude, waltz, and berceuse, they also frequently are modeled on or reference specific Chopin pieces. This document identifies how Rachmaninoff’s sets specifically and generally show the influence of Chopin’s style and works, while exploring how Rachmaninoff used Chopin’s models to create and present his unique compositional identity. Through this investigation, performers can better understand Chopin’s influence on Rachmaninoff’s piano works, and therefore improve their interpretations of his music. ii Copyright © 2018 by Sanghie Lee All rights reserved iii Acknowledgements I cannot express my heartfelt gratitude enough to my dear teacher James Tocco, who gave me devoted guidance and inspirational teaching for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachmaninoff, Isle of the Dead, Op. 29
    Sergei RACHMANINOFF rg Isle of the Dead, Op. 29 Sergei Vasilyevich Rachmaninoff (1 April 1873 – 28 March 1943) was a Russian composer, virtuoso pianist, and conductor. Born into a musical aristocratic family, Rachmaninoff enrolled in piano lessons at age 4, and began studying at the Saint Petersburg Conservatory at age 10. A somewhat failing domestic life, however, distracted Rachmaninoff from his early studies, as two of his sisters would die from disease before the age of 18, and his father – who lost 4 of the 5 family estates through his financial incompetence and gambling habits – left the family to live in Moscow. Upon his struggles, his cousin, Alexander Siloti – an accomplished pianist studying under Franz Liszt – suggested for Rachmaninoff to study at the Moscow Conservatory under his strict former teacher, Nikolai Zverev. Rachmaninoff would go on to study under Siloti himself, and graduated from the conservatory a year early, requesting to do his final exams prematurely to avoid studying under a new teacher after hearing that Siloti was leaving Moscow. After launching his compositional career, Rachmaninoff fell into a depression after learning of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky’s death, who had agreed to conduct his tone poem, The Rock (1893). Through his struggles, Rachmaninoff cancelled a Russian tour, pawned a gold watch given to him by Zverev, and debuted his Symphony No. 1 (1895) which was widely criticized – in large part due to conductor Alexander Glazunov’s misuse of rehearsal time and possible drunkenness during the performance. Following a 3-year writer’s block, Rachmaninoff would get counselling from Nikolai Dahl and compose his Piano Concerto No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phiiharmonic-Symphony Society 1842 of New York Consolidated 1928
    THE PHIIHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY 1842 OF NEW YORK CONSOLIDATED 1928 1952 ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH SEASON 1953 Musical Director: DIMITRI MITROPOULOS Guest Conductors: BRUNO WALTER, GEORGE SZELL, GUIDO CANTELLI Associate Conductor: FRANCO AUTORI For Young People’s Concerts: IGOR BUKETOFF CARNEGIE HALL 5176th Concert SUNDAY AFTERNOON, APRIL 19, 1953, at 2:30 Under the Direction of DIMITRI MITROPOULOS Assisting Artist: ARTUR RUBINSTEIN, Pianist FRANCK-PIERNE Prelude, Chorale and Fugue SCRIABIN The Poem of Ecstasy, Opus 54 Intermission SAINT-SAËNS Concerto for Piano and Orchestra, No. 2, G minor, Opus 22 I. Andante sostenuto II. Allegretto scherzando III. Presto Artur Rubinstein FRANCK Symphonic Variations for Piano and Orchestra Artur Rubinstein (Mr. Rubinstein plays the Steinway Piano) ARTHUR JUDSON, BRUNO ZIRATO, Managers THE STEINWAY is the Official Piano of The Philharmonic-Symphony Society COLUMBIA AND VICTOR RECORDS THE PHILHARMONIC-SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NEW YORK BOARD OF DIRECTORS •Floyd G. Blair........ ........President •Mrs. Lytle Hull... Vice-President •Mrs. John T. Pratt Vice-President ♦Ralph F. Colin Vice-President •Paul G. Pennoyer Vice-President ♦David M. Keiser Treasurer •William Rosenwald Assistant Treasurer •Parker McCollester Secretary •Arthur Judson Executive Secretary Arthur A. Ballantine Arthur A. Houghton, Jr. Mrs. William C. Breed Mrs. Arthur Lehman Chester Burden Mrs. Henry R. Luce •Mrs. Elbridge Gerry Chadwick David H. McAlpin Henry E. Coe Richard E. Myers Pierpont V. Davis William S. Paley Maitland A. Edey •Francis T. P. Plimpton Nevil Ford Mrs. David Rockefeller Mr. J. Peter Grace, Jr. Mrs. George H. Shaw G. Lauder Greenway Spyros P. Skouras •Mrs. Charles S. Guggenheimer •Mrs. Frederick T. Steinway •William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Symphony (In One Movem Ent), Op
    ONE MOVEMENT SYMPHONIES BARBER SIBELIUS SCRIABIN MICHAEL STERN KANSAS CITY SYMPH ONY A ‘PROF’ JOHNSON RECORDING SAMUEL BARBER First Symphony (In One Movem ent), Op. 9 (1936) Samuel Barber was born on March 9, 1910 in West Chester, Pennsylvania. His father was a physician and his mother a sister of the famous American contralto, Louise Homer. From the time he was six years old, Barber’s musical gifts were apparent, and at the age of 13 he was accepted as one of the first students to attend the newly established Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia. There he studied with Rosario Scalero (composition), Isabelle Vengerova (piano), and Emilio de Gogorza (voice). Although he began composing at the age of seven, he undertook it seriously at 18. Recognition of his gifts as a composer came quickly. In 1933 the Philadelphia Orchestra played his Overture to The School for Scandal and in 1935 the New York Philharmonic presented his Music for a Scene from Shelley . Both early compositions won considerable acclaim. Between 1935 and 1937 Barber was awarded the Prix de Rome and the Pulitzer Prize. He achieved overnight fame on November 5, 1938 when Arturo Toscanini conducted the NBC Symphony Orchestra in Barber’s Essay for Orchestra No. 1 and Adagio for Strings . The Adagio became one of the most popular American works of serious music, and through some lurid aberration of circumstance, it also became a favorite selection at state funerals and as background for death scenes in movies. During World War II, Barber served in the Army Air Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachmaninoff and the Flexibility of the Score: Issues Regarding Performance Practice
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 Rachmaninoff and the Flexibility of the Score: Issues Regarding Performance Practice Tanya Gabrielian The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2762 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] RACHMANINOFF AND THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE SCORE: ISSUES REGARDING PERFORMANCE PRACTICE by TANYA GABRIELIAN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts, The City University of New York 2018 Ó 2018 TANYA GABRIELIAN All Rights Reserved ii Rachmaninoff and the Flexibility of the Score: Issues Regarding Performance Practice by Tanya Gabrielian This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Music in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts. Date Anne Swartz Chair of Examining Committee Date Norman Carey Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Geoffrey Burleson Sylvia Kahan Ursula Oppens THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Rachmaninoff and the Flexibility of the Score: Issues Regarding Performance Practice by Tanya Gabrielian Advisor: Geoffrey Burleson Sergei Rachmaninoff’s piano music is a staple of piano literature, but academia has been slower to embrace his works. Because he continued to compose firmly in the Romantic tradition at a time when Debussy, Stravinsky, and Schoenberg variously represented the vanguard of composition, Rachmaninoff’s popularity has consequently not been as robust in the musicological community.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Concert Programs, Season 75, 1955-1956, Trip
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA FOUNDED IN I88I BY HENRY LEE HI 1955 1956 SEASON Veterans Memorial Auditorium, Providence Boston Symphony Orchestra (Seventy-fifth Season, 1955-1956) CHARLES MUNCH, Music Director RICHARD BURGIN, Associate Conductor PERSONNEL Violins Violas Bassoons Richard Burgin Joseph de Pasquale Sherman Walt Concert-master Jean Cauhape Ernst Panenka Alfred Krips Eugen Lehner Theodore Brewster George Zazofsky Albert Bernard Contra-Bassoon Rolland Tapley George Humphrey Richard Plaster Norbert Lauga Jerome Lipson Robert Karol Vladimir Resnikoff Horns Harry Dickson Reuben Green James Stagliano Gottfried AVilfinger Bernard Kadinoff Charles Yancich Einar Hansen Vincent Mauricci Harry Shapiro Joseph Leibovici John Fiasca Harold Meek Emil Kornsand Violoncellos Paul Keaney Roger Shermont Osbourne McConathy Samuel Mayes Minot Beale Alfred Zighera Herman Silberman Trumpets Jacobus Langendoen Roger Voisin Stanley Benson Mischa Nieland Leo Panasevich Marcel Lafosse Karl Zeise Armando Ghitalla Sheldon Rotenberg Josef Zimbler Gerard Goguen Fredy Ostrovsky Bernard Parronchi Clarence Knudson Leon MarjoUet Trombones Pierre Mayer Martin Hoherman William Gibson Manuel Zung Louis Berger William Moyer Kauko Kabila Samuel Diamond Richard Kapuscinski Josef Orosz Victor Manusevitch Robert Ripley James Nagy Flutes Tuba Melvin Bryant Doriot Anthony Dwyer K. Vinal Smith Lloyd Stonestreet James Pappoutsakis Saverio Messina Phillip Kaplan Harps William Waterhouse Bernard Zighera Piccolo William Marshall Olivia Luetcke Leonard Moss George Madsen Jesse
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander SCRIABIN
    SCRIABIN Piano Music • 2 Allegro appassionato Fantaisie in B minor Impromptus Soyeon Kate Lee, Piano Alexander Scriabin (1872-1915) Piano Music • 2 Expressive beauty and refined originality are hallmarks of Zverev’s favourite students, including ‘Scriabushka’, as The relationship between an early un-numbered He approved of the work’s brooding opening, melodic much of Scriabin’s keyboard music. In an article published Scriabin was affectionately named because of his piano sonata in E flat minor and the Allegro appassionato, abundance and generally virtuosic style. After a while, in The Musical Times in 1940, Scriabin’s old colleague diminutive stature. Scriabin used to perform music by his Op. 4, dating from about 1892, is fascinating. Although curiosity got the better of him and he called out, ‘Who wrote Leonid Sabaneev argued that these qualities entitle his great heroes Schumann and Chopin at these events, but the two works differ considerably from a structural point of that? It sounds a bit familiar.’ ‘It’s your Fantasy’, came the smaller piano pieces to a permanent place in the musical he also tried out his own latest compositions, including the view, a distinct sense of overlap remains. During the three response. ‘What Fantasy?’ It was the Fantaisie in B minor, repertory. He was confident that this would eventually charming Waltz in G sharp minor, which he wrote around or four years separating them, Scriabin had tightened up Op. 28, which Scriabin had composed several years happen and that Scriabin was destined for revaluation and 1886, when he was no more than fourteen. his compositional style in the interests of good pianistic earlier, around the turn of the century.
    [Show full text]
  • Scriabin (1872-1915) the Complete Piano Sonatas
    ALEXANDER SCRIABIN (1872-1915) THE COMPLETE PIANO SONATAS SOMMCD 262-2 Peter Donohoe piano CD 1 [74:34] 1 – 4 Sonata No. 1 in F Minor, Op. 6 (1892) 23:58 5 – 6 Sonata No. 2 in G Sharp Minor, Op. 19, “Sonata-Fantasy” (1892-97) 12:10 7 – bl Sonata No. 3 in F Sharp Minor, Op. 23 (1897-98) 18:40 SCRIABIN bm – bn Sonata No. 4 in F Sharp Major, Op. 30 (1903) 7:40 bo Sonata No. 5, Op. 53 (1907) 12:05 THE COMPLETE CD 2 [65:51] 1 Sonata No. 6, Op. 62 (1911) 13:13 PIANO SONATAS 2 Sonata No. 7, Op. 64, “White Mass” (1911) 11:47 3 Sonata No. 8, Op. 66 (1912-13) 13:27 4 Sonata No. 9, Op. 68, “Black Mass” (1912-13) 7:52 5 Sonata No. 10, Op. 70 (1913) 12:59 6 Vers La Flamme, Op. 72 (1914) 6:29 TURNER Recorded live at the Turner Sims Concert Hall SIMS Southampton on 26-28 September 2014 and 2-4 May 2015 Recording Producer: Siva Oke ∙ Recording Engineer: Paul Arden-Taylor Peter Donohoe Front Cover: Peter Donohoe © Chris Cristodoulou Design & Layout: Andrew Giles piano DDD © & 2016 SOMM RECORDINGS · THAMES DITTON · SURREY · ENGLAND Made in the EU SCRIABIN PIANO SONATAS DISC 1 [74:34] SONATA NO. 5, Op. 53 (1907) bo Allegro. Impetuoso. Con stravaganza – Languido – 12:05 SONATA NO. 1 in F Minor, Op. 6 (1892) [23:58] Presto con allegrezza 1 I. Allegro Con Fuoco 9:13 2 II. Crotchet=40 (Lento) 5:01 3 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Scriabin (1871-1915): Piano Miniature As Chronicle of His
    ALEXANDER SCRIABIN (1871-1915): PIANO MINIATURE AS CHRONICLE OF HIS CREATIVE EVOLUTION; COMPLEXITY OF INTERPRETIVE APPROACH AND ITS IMPLICATIONS Nataliya Sukhina, B.M., M.M. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2008 APPROVED: Vladimir Viardo, Major Professor Elvia Puccinelli, Minor Professor Pamela Paul, Committee Member Graham Phipps, Director of Graduate Studies in the College of Music James C. Scott, Dean of the College of Music Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Sukhina, Nataliya. Alexander Scriabin (1871-1915): Piano miniature as chronicle of his creative evolution; Complexity of interpretive approach and its implications. Doctor of Musical Arts (Performance), May 2008, 86 pp., 30 musical examples, 3 tables, 1 figure, references, 70 titles. Scriabin’s piano miniatures are ideal for the study of evolution of his style, which underwent an extreme transformation. They present heavily concentrated idioms and structural procedures within concise form, therefore making it more accessible to grasp the quintessence of the composer’s thought. A plethora of studies often reviews isolated genres or periods of Scriabin’s legacy, making it impossible to reveal important general tendencies and inner relationships between his pieces. While expanding the boundaries of tonality, Scriabin completed the expansion and universalization of the piano miniature genre. Starting from his middle years the ‘poem’ characteristics can be found in nearly every piece. The key to this process lies in Scriabin’s compilation of certain symbolical musical gestures. Separation between technical means and poetic intention of Scriabin’s works as well as rejection of his metaphysical thought evolution result in serious interpretive implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Prometheus” and the Russian Symbolist Poetics of Light
    The Poet of Fire: Aleksandr Skriabin’s Synaesthetic Symphony “Prometheus” and the Russian Symbolist Poetics of Light Polina D. Dimova Summer 2009 Polina D. Dimova is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley Jean Delville, Cover Illustration for the Original Score of Aleksandr Skriabin’s “Prometheus: A Poem of Fire” Acknowledgements The writing of this essay on Aleksandr Skriabin and Russian Symbolism would not have been possible without the guidance, thought-provoking discussions, and meticulous readings of my dissertation committee—my advisor, Professor Eric Naiman; Professor Robert P. Hughes; Professor Barbara Spackman; and Professor Richard Taruskin. I was generously funded by a Graduate Division Summer Grant from UC Berkeley for my research trip to Moscow in 2006. I want to express my gratitude to the researchers and staff at The Aleksandr Skriabin State Museum, Moscow, for allowing me to access archival print and video materials, concerning Skriabin’s “Prometheus,” as well as for kindly offering their help and expertise. I have been fortunate to discuss specialized sections of my work with William Quillen, a Berkeley Ph.D. Candidate in Musicology and Donovan Lee, a Berkeley Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Abstract: This paper discusses the synaesthetically informed metaphors of light, fire, and the Sun in Russian Symbolism and shows their scientific, technological, and cultural resonance in the novel experience of electric light in Russia. The essay studies the harmonic synaesthetics of Aleksandr Skriabin’s symphony “Prometheus, A Poem of Fire”—which also includes an enigmatic musically notated part for an electric organ of lights, along with Symbolist texts concerning light and electricity and the synaesthetic poetry of fire by Skriabin’s close associate Konstantin Bal’mont.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN Symphonies TCHAIKOVSKY • BORODIN • PROKOFIEV • MYASKOVSKY • SHOSTAKOVICH RIMSKY-KORSAKOV • RACHMANINOV • SCRIABIN • GLAZUNOV • KALINNIKOV
    GREAT RUSSIAN SYMPHONIES TCHAIKOVSKY • BORODIN • PROKOFIEV • MYASKOVSKY • SHOSTAKOVICH RIMSKY-KORSAKOV • RACHMANINOV • SCRIABIN • GLAZUNOV • KALINNIKOV 1 8.501059 Rimsky-Korsakov acquired a high degree of musical expertise, helped by leaving the GREAT RUSSIAN SYMPHONIES navy and taking up a position as inspector of naval bands. He remained the most fully professional of the Five, with particular skill in orchestration. In the nature of things TCHAIKOVSKY • BORODIN • PROKOFIEV • MYASKOVSKY Borodin, Mussorgsky and Cui had to combine their careers with composition. Cui, a SHOSTAKOVICH • RIMSKY-KORSAKOV harsh critic, excelled in shorter, genre pieces, while the first two left much unfinished at RACHMANINOV • SCRIABIN • GLAZUNOV • KALINNIKOV their deaths, works to be revised and completed by Rimsky-Korsakov. The Russian composers who followed were able to benefit both from the teaching INTRODUCTION of the Conservatories and from the ideals of the nationalists, but later generations were greatly affected by the course of Russian politics. The first Russian revolution of 1905 had found Rimsky-Korsakov siding with the students in a political disturbance that, for The mid-nineteenth century brought increasing awareness of national identities the time being, lost him his position at the St Petersburg Conservatory. The resulting throughout Europe and not least in Russia. Led by Balakirev, a group of five nationalist constitutional settlement lasted until the final victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Russian composers, described by the polymath Vladimir Stasov as Mogushka, the Revolution of 1917. The establishment of a socialist régime in Russia changed the Mighty Handful, and otherwise known as The Five, worked intermittently together course of Russian music and the lives of Russian musicians.
    [Show full text]