DOCSLIB.ORG

"In the Wake of Hms Dragon"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

"IN THE WAKE OF HMS DRAGON" CAPT (SAN) IV OR C. LITTLE Much has recently been written about With a resurgence in interest, spear- the South African Navy in World War 2 headed by Cdr Mac Bisset of the Naval but comparatively little has been men- Museum in Simonstown, in South Afri- tioned about South Africans serving in cans seconded to the Royal Navy in the Royal Navy over the same period. World War 2 she has become noted. Various articles have appeared in Large drafts of Royal Naval Volunteer "Navy News" and other publications Reserve personnel were called up at concerning veterans who served in the outbreak of the war to augment her, so let us consider the ship in detail. the peacetime crews of British warships and bring them up to their wartime DRAGON was a DANAE class light manning scale. One of these groups cruiser ordered in September 1916 as was dispatched to West Africa to join an "Improved CERESclass" and in re- HMS DRAGON, reputedly in her time sponse to an intelligence report, later the luckiest ship in the Royal Navy. Dur- proved false, that the Germans were ing her career she was comparatively planning a powerful new light cruiser obscure - never doing anything of note class. She was one of three, her sisters and her fame rested entirely on her being DANAE and DAUNTLESS, and ability to never be in the wrong place these three were later followed by a at any time. She was in fact a maritime second group of nine ships, making a dodger, malingerer and skiver and her class of 12 in all. Their design was ef- crew, especially the South Africans fective but unbalanced and as com- aboard, loved her for it. After her luck pleted with a large aircraft hanger un- finally ran out and she was sunk, she der the bridge behind B gun they were became a popular ship in literature (at well armed but ungainly looking ships. least three books have been written based on adventures in her) and has The DRAGON was laid down by Scott since emerged in reference books as a and Co in January 1917 and launched bit of a curiosity because of her origi- on the 29th of December 1917. When nal strange design. completed in August 1918 she had a 14 Militaria 23/3 7993 length of 142,6m, a beam of 13,9m and on station by the armed merchantman draught of 5,Om. When fully loaded her RAWALPINDI. Eight hours after the tonnage was 5870 tons and this weight handover RAWALPINDI encountered was pushed along by twin Brown-Curtis the German pocket battleships turbines which generated 40 000 shp SCHARNHORST and GNEISENAU. The and gave her a designed speed of 29 RAWALPINDI,an ex P and 0 passenger knots. Although lightly armoured she liner was commanded by Captain E.C. was by the standards of the time well Kennedy and manned by a crew of armed with a main armament of six x 6 reservists. She was armed with eight six- inch guns. She had a wartime comple- inch guns and was no match for the ment of 450 men. two 2600 ton German battleships and their eleven inch guns. On completion of her trials DRAGON was posted to the 5th Light Cruiser Kennedy had stumbled upon a brace Squadron (LCS), Harwich Force, start- of tigers and immediately laid down a ing her career by arriving just in time smoke screen and attempted to es- for the end of the war. Early in 1919 she cape into a fog bank. The was transferred to the Baltic where SCHARNHORSTcut him off, signalled once again she got in on the end of him to stop and put a shot across his the trouble and in time to move back bows. When the RAWALPINDI ignored to the Atlantic. There she joined the this the SCHARNHORSTfired a salvo at peacetime navy as part of the 1st Light her. Kennedy immediately replied with Cruiser Squadron, Atlantic Fleet. Her a salvo of his own. The GNEISENAUnow main duty here was to form part of the entered the action and a one- sided escort for the Prince of Wales' visit to battle ensued where the RAWALPINDI the West Indies in August 1919. was battered into a smoking wreck in 40 minutes. Kennedy refused to surren- She was a happy ship and remained in der and his ship sunk slowly so that 39 the Atlantic for all of her peacetime officers and 226 ratings went down career, changing her appearance for fighting with the ship. Only 37 seamen the better and being mainly employed survived, picked up by the Germans on the West Indies station. During this and the armed merchant cruiser period a young Boy Seaman by the CHITRAL. Kennedy was awarded a name of Joe Almond served in her. He posthumous VC. later emigrated to South Africa after the war and became chief instructor DRAGON was then switched to the at the "General Botha" where, affec- Mediterranean and assigned to con- tionately known as "Nuts", he was voy escort duties, particularly off the mentor to generations of South African Italian coast and Greek Islands. These seafarers. easy assignments proved the war to be a pleasant jolly from which a ship such Towards the end of the '30s there fol- as DRAGON could well be spared and lowed a period in reserve and then in she was sent to the Indian Ocean. A September 1939 she was few weeks later Italy entered the war recommissioned at Chatham for war on the side of the Axis - too late to up- service. By this time the DRAGON was set the DRAGON's Mediterranean cruis- no longer quite as modern as she ing but in time to enable her at long could be nor could she breathe the last after more than 20 years to get. amount of fire really required, but with into action. Together with the aircraft the motto- "We yield, but only to St carrier HERMES she bombarded George! "proudly displayed on the Mogadishu in Italian Somaliland - crest on her bridge-front she went off hardly a difficult assignment. This com- to war. pleted she went back around the Cape to West Africa to take her place Her first posting was back to her old in a task force occupying Dakar. Here station in the Atlantic. Thistime not the she lived up to her fire-eating name by sunny climes of the West Indies but the taking part in the sinking of a subma- harsh conditions of the Greenland Gap rine and capturing the French mer- and the Northern Atlantic. After one chant ship MENDOZA which she then patrol of this nature she was relieved escorted to Freetown in Sierra Leone. Militaria 23/3 7993 15 ing. At Simonstown a further group of There she was joined by 11 South Afri- South Africans joined the ship as part cans, amongst them Eric Little, John of her engineering complement. The van der Byl, now a leading resident of refit dragged on into mid-winter (al- Irene in the Transvaal, Norman though no one was complaining) until Macdonald of Johannesburg, S.A. finally the elderly ship was ready for Swinney of Port Elizabeth and L.R. her next bout of action which came Reader of Gilletts in Natal. After being about sooner than expected. called up they had been kitted out and transported to Freetown in the A rough passage to Port Elizabeth to troopship STRATHMORE. There they "show the flag" was cut short when the were transferred to the depot ship ED- DRAGON was abruptly sailed from PE INBURGH CASTLEto await assignment. leaving 15 of her crew ashore. The As the weeks dragged on some of Court Line freighter HANNINGTON them were appointed to the Flower- COURT had been mined and was class corvette CLEMATIS (which had ablaze from stem to stern whilst the Ad- just been engaged in a highly success- miralty tug ST DOGMAEL attempted to ful action against a surface raider) for tow her to safety. The weather was a spell before being returned to the atrocious and although the tug got the EDINBURGHCASTLEand ultimately put crew off, the ship was unsalvageable aboard the DRAGON. and was eventually sunk by 13 shells from the DRAGON's 6 inch guns. This The elderly DRAGON, with her happy done the DRAGON escorted the ST complement recently augmented by DOGMAEL to Simonstown and then re- her Springbok contingent, then sailed turned to Durban to escort a convoy for Takoradi. Her crew were supremely to Mauritius. One of the ships in the confident. Their successes in Dakar had convoy was the Bank Liner resulted in them taking the full brunt of TEVIOTBANKwith a full cargo of mines. the French shore batteries fire which This ship and DRAGON ploughed along had accomplished no more than 37 side by side to Port Louis, the only ex- shrapnel holes, a few slightly burned citement of the trip being the intercep- seamen and one dead canary in the tion of a Vichy French convoy by the seamens' mess. A short and uneventful RN in the same vicinity. Together they stop in Takoradi as a convoy escort pushed on to Colombo and then on to was followed by a short run on to La- Singapore where the twosome split up. gos, Nigeria. Whilst entering the har- DRAGON had a new home port, in fact bour there in dense fog the DRAGON she was now part of the Eastern Fleet, narrowly escaped collision with a de- a grand title for herself and HMS MAU- parting ship.
Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922

    United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922

    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
  • Guns Blazing! Newsletter of the Naval Wargames Society No

    Guns Blazing! Newsletter of the Naval Wargames Society No

    All Guns Blazing! Newsletter of the Naval Wargames Society No. 290 – DECEMBER 2018 Extract from President Roosevelt’s, “Fireside Chat to the Nation”, 29 December 1940: “….we cannot escape danger by crawling into bed and pulling the covers over our heads……if Britain should go down, all of us in the Americas would be living at the point of a gun……We must produce arms and ships with every energy and resource we can command……We must be the great arsenal of democracy”. oOoOoOoOoOoOoOo The Poppies of four years ago at the Tower of London have been replaced by a display of lights. Just one of many commemorations around the World to mark one hundred years since the end of The Great War. Another major piece of art, formed a focal point as the UK commemorated 100 years since the end of the First World War. The ‘Shrouds of the Somme’ brought home the sheer scale of human sacrifice in the battle that came to epitomize the bloodshed of the 1914-18 war – the Battle of the Somme. Artist Rob Heard hand stitched and bound calico shrouds for 72,396 figures representing British Commonwealth servicemen killed at the Somme who have no known grave, many of whose bodies were never recovered and whose names are engraved on the Thiepval Memorial. Each figure of a human form, was individually shaped, shrouded and made to a name. They were laid out shoulder to shoulder in hundreds of rows to mark the Centenary of Armistice Day at Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park from 8-18th November 2018 filling an area of over 4000 square metres.
  • On Our Doorstep Parts 1 and 2

    On Our Doorstep Parts 1 and 2

    ON 0UR DOORSTEP I MEMORIAM THE SECOD WORLD WAR 1939 to 1945 HOW THOSE LIVIG I SOME OF THE PARISHES SOUTH OF COLCHESTER, WERE AFFECTED BY WORLD WAR 2 Compiled by E. J. Sparrow Page 1 of 156 ON 0UR DOORSTEP FOREWORD This is a sequel to the book “IF YOU SHED A TEAR” which dealt exclusively with the casualties in World War 1 from a dozen coastal villages on the orth Essex coast between the Colne and Blackwater. The villages involved are~: Abberton, Langenhoe, Fingringhoe, Rowhedge, Peldon: Little and Great Wigborough: Salcott: Tollesbury: Tolleshunt D’Arcy: Tolleshunt Knights and Tolleshunt Major This likewise is a community effort by the families, friends and neighbours of the Fallen so that they may be remembered. In this volume we cover men from the same villages in World War 2, who took up the challenge of this new threat .World War 2 was much closer to home. The German airfields were only 60 miles away and the villages were on the direct flight path to London. As a result our losses include a number of men, who did not serve in uniform but were at sea with the fishing fleet, or the Merchant avy. These men were lost with the vessels operating in what was known as “Bomb Alley” which also took a toll on the Royal avy’s patrol craft, who shepherded convoys up the east coast with its threats from: - mines, dive bombers, e- boats and destroyers. The book is broken into 4 sections dealing with: - The war at sea: the land warfare: the war in the air & on the Home Front THEY WILL OLY DIE IF THEY ARE FORGOTTE.
  • World War I Context Follow up in 1915, Europe Was Embroiled in U.S

    World War I Context Follow up in 1915, Europe Was Embroiled in U.S

    1915: World War I Context Follow Up In 1915, Europe was embroiled in U.S. newspapers aroused outrage war, but U.S. public sentiment op- against Germany for ruthlessly kill- posed involvement. President ing defenceless Americans. The U.S. Woodrow Wilson said they would was being drawn into the war. In “remain neutral in fact as well as in June 1916, Congress increased the name.”23 size of the army. In September, Con- gress allocated $7 billion for national Pretext Incident defense, “the largest sum appropri- On May 7, 1915, a German subma- ated to that time.”30 rine (U-boat) sank the Lusitania, a In January 1917, the British British passenger ship killing 1,198, said they had intercepted a German including 128 Americans.24 message to Mexico seeking an alli- The public was not told that ance with Germany and offering to passengers were, in effect, a ‘human help Mexico recover land ceded to shield’ protecting six million rounds the U.S. On April 2, Wilson told of U.S. ammunition bound for Brit- Congress: “The world must be safe ain.25 To Germany, the ship was a for democracy.” Four days later the threat. To Britain, it was bait for lur- U.S. declared war on Germany.31 ing an attack. Why? A week before the attack, Real Reasons British Admiralty leader, Winston The maneuvre which brings Influential British military, political Churchill wrote to the Board of an ally into the field is as and business interests wanted U.S. Trade’s president saying it is “most serviceable as that which help in their war with Germany.
  • The Movement for the Reformation of Manners, 1688-1715

    The Movement for the Reformation of Manners, 1688-1715

    THE MOVEMENT FOR THE REFORMATION OF MANNERS, 1688-1715 ANDREW GORDON CRAIG 1980 (reset and digitally formatted 2015) PREFACE TO THE 2015 VERSION This study was completed in the pre-digital era and since then has been relatively inaccessible to researchers. To help rectify that, the 1980 typescript submitted for the degree of PhD from Edinburgh University has been reset and formatted in Microsoft “Word” and Arial 12pt as an easily readable font and then converted to a read-only PDF file for circulation. It is now more compact than the original typescript version and fully searchable. Some minor typographical errors have been corrected but no material published post-1980 has been added except in the postscript (see below). Pagination in the present version does not correspond to the original because of computerised resetting of the text. Footnotes in this version are consecutive throughout, rather than chapter by chapter as required in the 1980 version. The original bound copy is lodged in Edinburgh University Library. A PDF scan of it is available at https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk /bitstream/handle/1842/6840/254333.pdf A further hand-corrected copy is available together with my research archive in the Special Collections Department at St Andrews University Library. http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/library/specialcollections/ A note for researchers interested in the movement for the reformation of manners 1688-1715 and afterwards has been added as a postscript which lists other studies which have utilised this work and its sources in various ways. I am grateful to the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland for its generous scholarship support while a research student at Edinburgh University undertaking this study in the 1970s and to the following for their encouragement, guidance and support during the creation and completion of this research.
  • Defence Acquisition

    Defence Acquisition

    Defence acquisition Alex Wild and Elizabeth Oakes 17th May 2016 He efficient procurement of defence equipment has long been a challenge for British governments. It is an extremely complex process that is yet to be mastered with vast T sums of money invariably at stake – procurement and support of military equipment consumes around 40 per cent of annual defence cash expenditure1. In 2013-14 Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) spent £13.9bn buying and supporting military equipment2. With the House of Commons set to vote on the “Main Gate” decision to replace Trident in 2016, the government is set to embark on what will probably be the last major acquisition programme in the current round of the Royal Navy’s post-Cold War modernisation strategy. It’s crucial that the errors of the past are not repeated. Introduction There has been no shortage of reports from the likes of the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee on the subject of defence acquisition. By 2010 a £38bn gap had opened up between the equipment programme and the defence budget. £1.5bn was being lost annually due to poor skills and management, the failure to make strategic investment decisions due to blurred roles and accountabilities and delays to projects3. In 2008, the then Secretary of State for Defence, John Hutton, commissioned Bernard Gray to produce a review of defence acquisition. The findings were published in October 2009. The following criticisms of the procurement process were made4: 1 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120913104443/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/78821960-14A0-429E- A90A-FA2A8C292C84/0/ReviewAcquisitionGrayreport.pdf 2 https://www.nao.org.uk/report/reforming-defence-acquisition-2015/ 3 https://www.nao.org.uk/report/reforming-defence-acquisition-2015/ 4 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120913104443/http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/78821960-14A0-429E- A90A-FA2A8C292C84/0/ReviewAcquisitionGrayreport.pdf 1 [email protected] Too many types of equipment are ordered for too large a range of tasks at too high a specification.
  • Appendix 1 – the Evolution of HMS Dorsetshire

    Appendix 1 – the Evolution of HMS Dorsetshire

    Appendix 1 – The Evolution of HMS Dorsetshire This image and the one on the next page show Dorsetshire in 1930, during builder’s trials1 Dorsetshire in July 19312 Dorsetshire in 1932.At this time her secondary and tertiary armament is still very light, just four single 4-inch guns abreast the forward funnels and four single 2-pdr pompoms abreast the bridge3 This 1948 model, shown to better advantage on the next page, depicts Dorsetshire under refit in 1937 in No. 14 Dock at Portsmouth Dockyard. The twin 4-inch mountings are in place abreast the funnels, as are the octuple 2-pounder pom poms aft of the torpedo tubes.4 Dorsetshire in dock at Singapore after her 1937 refit.5 This image and the one on the next page show how difficult it was for her to engage aircraft attacking from directly ahead. The arrows highlight her guns as follows: blue = twin 4-inch red = quad .5-inch green = octuple 2-pdr pom poms Dorsetshire in 19416 Three shots of Dorsetshire in 1941. The painting of the aft funnel and part of the hull in a light colour was meant to make her appear to be a single-funnelled vessel – a sloop, according to one source. The paint scheme was possibly first applied at Simonstown between 16 and 20 March, since this was apparently Dorsetshire’s only docking between December 1940 and June-July 1941. The top image was taken at Cape Town, possibly between 21 and 23 April 1941. The centre image was presumably taken prior to the June-July refit, since the ship sports what seems to have been the original version of this paint scheme.
  • Freedom by Reaching the Wooden World: American Slaves and the British Navy During the War of 1812

    Freedom by Reaching the Wooden World: American Slaves and the British Navy During the War of 1812

    Freedom by Reaching the Wooden World: American Slaves and the British Navy during the War of 1812. Thomas Malcomson Les noirs américains qui ont échappé à l'esclavage pendant la guerre de 1812 l'ont fait en fuyant vers les navires de la marine britannique. Les historiens ont débattu de l'origine causale au sein de cette histoire, en la plaçant soit entièrement dans les mains des esclaves fugitifs ou les Britanniques. L'historiographie a mis l'accent sur l'expérience des réfugiés dans leur lieu de réinstallation définitive. Cet article réexamine la question des causes et se concentre sur la période comprise entre le premier contact des noirs américains qui ont fuit l'esclavage et la marine britannique, et le départ définitif des ex-esclaves avec les Britanniques à la fin de la guerre. L'utilisation des anciens esclaves par les Britanniques contre les Américains en tant que guides, espions, troupes armées et marins est examinée. Les variations locales en l'interaction entre les esclaves fugitifs et les Britanniques à travers le théâtre de la guerre, de la Chesapeake à la Nouvelle-Orléans, sont mises en évidence. As HMS Victorious lay at anchor in Lynnhaven Bay, off Norfolk, in the early morning hours of 10 March 1813, a boat approached from the Chesapeake shore.1 Its occupants, nine American Black men drew the attention of the sailors in the guard boat circling the 74 gun ship. The men were runaway slaves. After a cautious inspection, the guard boat’s crew towed them to the Victorious where the nine Black men climbed up the ship’s side and entered freedom.
  • 100 Years of Submarines in the RCN!

    100 Years of Submarines in the RCN!

    Starshell ‘A little light on what’s going on!’ Volume VII, No. 65 ~ Winter 2013-14 Public Archives of Canada 100 years of submarines in the RCN! National Magazine of The Naval Association of Canada Magazine nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada www.navalassoc.ca Please help us put printing and postage costs to more efficient use by opting not to receive a printed copy of Starshell, choosing instead to read the FULL COLOUR PDF e-version posted on our web site at http:www.nava- Winter 2013-14 lassoc.ca/starshell When each issue is posted, a notice will | Starshell be sent to all Branch Presidents asking them to notify their ISSN 1191-1166 members accordingly. You will also find back issues posted there. To opt out of the printed copy in favour of reading National magazine of The Naval Association of Canada Starshell the e-Starshell version on our website, please contact the Magazine nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada Executive Director at [email protected] today. Thanks! www.navalassoc.ca PATRON • HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh OUR COVER RCN SUBMARINE CENTENNIAL HONORARY PRESIDENT • H. R. (Harry) Steele The two RCN H-Class submarines CH14 and CH15 dressed overall, ca. 1920-22. Built in the US, they were offered to the • RCN by the Admiralty as they were surplus to British needs. PRESIDENT Jim Carruthers, [email protected] See: “100 Years of Submarines in the RCN” beginning on page 4. PAST PRESIDENT • Ken Summers, [email protected] TREASURER • Derek Greer, [email protected] IN THIS EDITION BOARD MEMBERS • Branch Presidents NAVAL AFFAIRS • Richard Archer, [email protected] 4 100 Years of Submarines in the RCN HISTORY & HERITAGE • Dr.
  • Surya Class Frigate

    Surya Class Frigate

    SURYA CLASS FRIGATE A trailblazing design, the Surya class takes its place with the Constitution, Saladin and Fed- It wasn’t until 2248 that the Surya—along with the Coventry, Loknar, Saladin and Larson eration as one of the most important ship classes of the Class I era. classes—was able to free up the larger heavy cruisers and assume primary responsibility for defensive/offensive operations. It was from this point forward that these ships began to Originally, the Anton class was set to be produced to uprated specifications—the design build an impressive and fearsome reputation. itself being altered to correct a number of flaws. However, the changes compounded what was already a complicated and complex design. After review, the decision was sub- sequently reversed and existing ships were gradually withdrawn from service. In 2249, the Pralaya (FF 1855), Avenger (FF 1860) and Illustrious (FF 1863) were present with the 8th Fleet at the Battle of Thranstor. The introduction of Phaser weaponry that year and Instead, the ASDB revisited an earlier proposal, the Hunt class Light Cruiser. Little more than its presence on the majority of the Starfleet vessels present at the battle helped ensure a a Ptolemy class transport/tug with more comprehensive armament, Hunt was an intriguing swift and overwhelming Federation victory. The Pralaya was lost with all hands not long af- modification of an already proven design, though it was eventually dropped in favor of the ter, being drawn into an ambush outside the Beta Aurigae star system. Kearsarge class. Throughout the war though, a favored tactic of fleet commanders was to disguise these The potential of a fully armed Ptolemy was not lost on designers though and from this point, vessels as Ptolemy class transport/tugs and use them (usually in groups of 2 or more) as they continued to study various proposals based around it.
  • 1/23/2019 Sheet1 Page 1 Date Ship Hull Number Port Notes 31-Dec

    1/23/2019 Sheet1 Page 1 Date Ship Hull Number Port Notes 31-Dec

    Sheet1 1/23/2019 Date Ship Hull Number Port Notes 31-Dec-18 USNS Cesar Chavez T-AKE 14 Sembawang 31-Dec-18 USCGC William R Flores WPC 1103 Miami 31-Dec-18 USCGC Skipjack WPB 87353 Intracoastal City 31-Dec-18 USCGC Sanibel WPB 1312 Woods Hole 31-Dec-18 USCGC Resolute WMEC 620 St Petersburg FL 31-Dec-18 USCGC Oliver Berry WPC 1124 Honolulu 31-Dec-18 USCGC Flyingfish WPB 87346 Little Creek 31-Dec-18 USCGC Donald Horsley WPC 1127 San Juan 31-Dec-18 USCGC Bailey Barco WPC 1122 Ketchikan 31-Dec-18 USAV Missionary Ridge LCU 2028 Norfolk 31-Dec-18 USAV Hormigueros LCU 2024 Kuwait 31-Dec-18 MV Cape Hudson T-AKR 5066 Pearl Harbor 31-Dec-18 INS Nirupak J 20 Kochi 31-Dec-18 INS Kuthar P 46 Visakhapatnam 31-Dec-18 HNLMS Urania Y 8050 Drimmelen 31-Dec-18 HNLMS Holland P 840 Amsterdam 31-Dec-18 HMS Argyll F 231 Yokosuka 31-Dec-18 ABPF Cape Leveque Nil Darwin 30-Dec-18 HMCS Ville de Quebec FFH 332 Dubrovnik SNMG2 30-Dec-18 USNS Yano T-AKR 297 Norfolk 30-Dec-18 USNS Trenton T-EPF 5 Taranto 30-Dec-18 USNS Fall River T-EPF 4 Sattahip 30-Dec-18 USNS Catawba T-ATF 168 Jebel Ali 30-Dec-18 USCGC Washington WPB 1331 Guam 30-Dec-18 USCGC Sitkinak WPB 1329 Fort Hancock 30-Dec-18 USCGC Flyingfish WPB 87346 Norfolk 30-Dec-18 USCGC Blue Shark WPB 87360 Everett 30-Dec-18 HNLMS Urk M 861 Zeebrugge 30-Dec-18 HMS Brocklesby M 33 Mina Sulman 30-Dec-18 ABPF Cape Nelson Nil Darwin 29-Dec-18 ESPS Infanta Elena P76 Cartagena Return from patrol 29-Dec-18 RFS Ivan Antonov 601 Baltiysk Maiden Arrival 29-Dec-18 USNS Bowditch T-AGS 62 Guam 29-Dec-18 USNS Amelia Earhart T-AKE 6
  • World War II at Sea This Page Intentionally Left Blank World War II at Sea

    World War II at Sea This Page Intentionally Left Blank World War II at Sea

    World War II at Sea This page intentionally left blank World War II at Sea AN ENCYCLOPEDIA Volume I: A–K Dr. Spencer C. Tucker Editor Dr. Paul G. Pierpaoli Jr. Associate Editor Dr. Eric W. Osborne Assistant Editor Vincent P. O’Hara Assistant Editor Copyright 2012 by ABC-CLIO, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II at sea : an encyclopedia / Spencer C. Tucker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-59884-457-3 (hardcopy : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-59884-458-0 (ebook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Naval operations— Encyclopedias. I. Tucker, Spencer, 1937– II. Title: World War Two at sea. D770.W66 2011 940.54'503—dc23 2011042142 ISBN: 978-1-59884-457-3 EISBN: 978-1-59884-458-0 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, LLC 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America To Malcolm “Kip” Muir Jr., scholar, gifted teacher, and friend. This page intentionally left blank Contents About the Editor ix Editorial Advisory Board xi List of Entries xiii Preface xxiii Overview xxv Entries A–Z 1 Chronology of Principal Events of World War II at Sea 823 Glossary of World War II Naval Terms 831 Bibliography 839 List of Editors and Contributors 865 Categorical Index 877 Index 889 vii This page intentionally left blank About the Editor Spencer C.