Channel Islands Checklist of Lichens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Channel Islands Checklist of Lichens Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 145-302. 2012. *pdf effectively published online 23October2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) The Annotated Checklist of Lichens, Lichenicolous and Allied Fungi of Channel Islands National Park 1 2 KERRY KNUDSEN AND JANA KOCOURKOVÁ ABSTRACT. – For Channel Islands National Park, at the beginning of the 21st century, a preliminary baseline of diversity of 504 taxa in 152 genera and 56 families is established, comprising 448 lichens, 48 lichenicolous fungi, and 8 allied fungi. Verrucaria othmarii K. Knudsen & L. Arcadia nom. nov. is proposed for the illegitimate name V. rupicola (B. de Lesd.) Breuss, concurrently a neotype is also designated. Placidium boccanum is reported new for North America and California. Bacidia coprodes and Polycoccum pulvinatum are reported new for California. Catillaria subviridis is verified as occurring in California. Acarospora rhabarbarina is no longer recognized as occurring in North America. Seven species are considered endemic to Channel Islands National Park: Arthonia madreana, Caloplaca obamae, Dacampia lecaniae, Lecania caloplacicola, Lecania ryaniana, Plectocarpon nashii and Verrucaria aspecta. At least 54 species, many of which occur in Mexico, are only known in California from Channel Islands National Park INTRODUCTION Channel Islands National Park (heretofore referred to as CINP) in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties in southern California consists of five islands totalling approximately 346 square miles in area (221331 acres, 89569 ha, 900 km2). Santa Barabara Island, with an area of 1.02 square miles (639 acres, 259 ha, 2.63 km2) is the smallest island in CINP. It is a considered a member of the southern islands which include San Nicolas Island, Santa Catalina Island, and San Clemente Island, all outside the boundaries of the national park. The other four islands in CINP are called the northern islands and once formed a single island called Santarosae during a time of lower sea levels in the Pleistocene. They are Anacapa Island (699 acres, 283 ha, 1.14 mi2, 2.8 km2), Santa Cruz Island (60,645 acres, 24,542 ha, 96.51 mi2, 249.95 km2), Santa Rosa Island (52,794 acres, 21,365 ha, 83.12 mi2, 215.27 km2), and San Miguel Island (9,325 acres, 3,774 ha, 14.7 mi2, 37.74 km2) (Wikipedia, 2012). None of the islands were ever connected to the mainland of California. The northern islands represent the northwest end of the Transverse Ranges of southern California which include the Santa Monica Mountains and extend southeast to the Little San Bernardino Mountains in Joshua Tree National Park. The geology of the islands is comprised of various volcanic and sedimentary rocks on San Miguel, Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa Island with extensive marine terraces. Santa Barbara and Anacapa Island are primarily volcanic rock. Caliche can be found on San Miguel and Santa Rosa Island (Weigand 1998). The oceanic climate and the calcareous and non-calcareous rocks support a diverse community of saxicolous lichens. The marine terraces support biological soil crusts, which were probably extensive, before grazing, erosion, and the introduction of non-native plants. On all of the islands, the cessation of grazing, has allowed biological soil crusts to begin to become reestablished. Channel Islands National Park hosts approximately 790 plant taxa, of which about 578 are native and 205 are nonnative (CINP 2012). Major native plant communities are coastal sage shrub, maritime 1 KERRY KNUDSEN – Herbarium, Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521–0124, U.S.A. – e-mail: [email protected] 2 JANA KOCOURKOVÁ – Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6 - Suchdol, CZ–165 21, Czech Republic. – e-mail: [email protected] 145 chaparral, and forests of island oaks, mixed hardwoods, pine, and riparian trees. These plant communities support a rich diversity of epiphytic macrolichens and crusts, including 17 species of Usnea. The introduction of non-native animals including sheep, cattle, pigs, and rabbits (the latter on Santa Barbara Island) had a significant impact on vegetation, denuding large parts of the islands and causing greatly increased erosion rates. However non-native animals, as well as introduced elk and deer (both on Santa Rosa Island), have been removed from the CINP. Throughout the islands the native vegetation is regenerating as is the lichen flora. Based on available data all of the lichens reported here are native to CINP. The only historical collections of lichens from CINP that we have examined are a small number of collections by Blanche Trask from Santa Barbara Island, some which can be found in the Farlow Herbarium at Harvard University (FH) and at New York Botanical Garden (NY). The major modern collections from CINP are those assembled by William Weber (University of Colorad, Boulder; COLO) and Charis Bratt (Smithsonian Institution (US) and Santa Barbara Botanic Garden (SBBG)), beginning in the 1980’s. The Sonoran Lichen Flora Project, led by Thomas H. Nash III (Arizona State Univeristy; ASU) and Bruce Ryan (ASU), with the help of Charis Bratt, led to the extensive collection of lichens in the mid- ninties on West Anacapa, San Miguel, Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa Island by an international team of lichenologists. The three volumes of the Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region (Nash et al. 2002, 2004, 2007), written by an international team of more than 80 lichenologists included both the southern and northern Channel Islands as well as the Santa Monica Mountains. It forms the foundation for the study of the lichens and lichenicolous fungi of CINP in the beginning of the 21st century. Our study of CINP began in 2006. There are a total of 9,361 collections of lichens, lichenicolous fungi, and allied fungi deposited in the four herbaria with significant collections from CINP (ASU, MIN (University of Minnesota), SBBG, and UCR (University of California, Riverside)) (CNALH 2012; UCR Herbarium 2012). These same herbaria contain 51,528 collections from the whole of California. Thus with 18% of the total number of lichen vouchers from California having been collected in CINP, the study area represents the most collected and studied area in the state in terms of Lichenology. Nonetheless, after the publication of the Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, new records and new species for the CINP continue to be discovered (Knudsen 2008, 2009a–b; Knudsen & Kocourková 2008, 2010; Knudsen & Lendemer 2009; Kocourková & Knudsen 2008, 2009a–c, 2010, 2011; Kocourková et al. 2009, 2012; Kukwa & Knudsen 2011; Lendemer & Knudsen 2010; Lendemer 2010; Lendemer & Hodkinson in review). During our studies, we have also discovered many remaining taxonomic problems that need to be resolved and identifications of specimens that need to be verified or revised, particulairly at SBBG. Much exploration for lichens also remains to be done in CINP. For instance, the majority of collections from Santa Cruz and Santa Rosa Islands were made only near the main roads. The east end of Santa Cruz Island had not even been visited by lichenologists until our recent fieldwork. There have been no collections on the Middle Island of Anacapa. In fact we estimate that 75% or more of the total area of the islands has never been explored for lichens. Lichenicolous fungi as well as some lichen genera and substrates have also been undercollected, including epiphytic crusts on bark, sterile crusts, and biological soil crusts. There has also been no study of intertidal lichens, which are in danger of extirpation if ocean levels rise rapidly due to global warming. Several rare lichen species such as Harpidium nashii Scheidegger, Hypogymnia schizidiata McCune, and Tornabea scutellifera (With.) J.R. Laundon may be extirpated and should be the subject of targeted surveys to relocate and map any extant populations. Three species endemic to CINP are currently only known from their type collections and should be the subject of similar investegations. These include Dacampia lecaniae Kocourk. and K. Knudsen, Plectocarpon nashii Hafellner, and Toninia nashii Timdal. The discovery of Arthonia subdispuncta Nyl. ex Hasse on West Anacapa (Knudsen & Kocourková 2010a), a species apparently extirpated from the Santa Monica Mountains, gives us hope that other rare or extirpated taxa from the Santa Monica Mountains and southern California, such as Bacidia veneta S. Elman, Verrucaria dacryodes Nyl. ex Hasse (Plate 1, Fig. A), and Rinodina terricola Sheard and K. Knudsen (Plate 1, Fig. B) will be discovered in CINP. All of these areas of investigation have necessitated the publication of this preliminary checklist of CINP, officially sanctioned by the National Park Service, to guide further exploration, study, and prepare for the eventual publication of a lichen flora of the northern Channel Islands. 146 MATERIALS AND METHODS The identification of specimens was based primarily on the Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region (Nash et al. 2002, 2004, 2007), except where other literature is cited for the description of the species in the header or in the notes. The identifications of specimens not seen by the authors were only accepted if made by recognized taxonomic experts, usually the assorted authors of the treatments of the Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, or our collegue J.C. Lendemer (NY). All the idenifications of Channel Island specimens at SBBG, not verified by taxonomic experts or the authors of the present work, are here excluded from the species list and distribution data until they are revised in the future for a flora of CINP. Specimens at UCR needing further verification were also excluded but are searchable online http://www.herbarium.ucr.edu. Undescribed taxa mentioned in the literature or filed in the herbarium at UCR were also excluded. Verified new additions to the offficial checklist will be published in updates in future volumes of Opuscula Philolichenum.
Recommended publications
  • Cuivre Bryophytes
    Trip Report for: Cuivre River State Park Species Count: 335 Date: Multiple Visits Lincoln County Agency: MODNR Location: Lincoln Hills - Bryophytes Participants: Bryophytes from Natural Resource Inventory Database Bryophyte List from NRIDS and Bruce Schuette Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acarospora unknown Identified only to Genus Acarosporaceae Lichen Acrocordia megalospora a lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Amandinea dakotensis a button lichen (crustose) Physiaceae Lichen Amandinea polyspora a button lichen (crustose) Physiaceae Lichen Amandinea punctata a lichen Physiaceae Lichen Amanita citrina Citron Amanita Amanitaceae Fungi Amanita fulva Tawny Gresette Amanitaceae Fungi Amanita vaginata Grisette Amanitaceae Fungi Amblystegium varium common willow moss Amblystegiaceae Moss Anisomeridium biforme a lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Anisomeridium polypori a crustose lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Anomodon attenuatus common tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Anomodon minor tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Anomodon rostratus velvet tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Armillaria tabescens Ringless Honey Mushroom Tricholomataceae Fungi Arthonia caesia a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthonia punctiformis a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthonia rubella a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthothelium spectabile a lichen Uncertain Lichen Arthothelium taediosum a lichen Uncertain Lichen Aspicilia caesiocinerea a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen Aspicilia cinerea a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen Aspicilia contorta a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen
    [Show full text]
  • Untangling Quantitative Lichen Diversity in and Around Badrinath Holy Pilgrimage of Western Himalaya, India
    Journal of Graphic Era University Vol. 6, Issue 1, 36-46, 2018 ISSN: 0975-1416 (Print), 2456-4281 (Online) Untangling Quantitative Lichen Diversity in and Around Badrinath Holy Pilgrimage of Western Himalaya, India Sugam Gupta1, Omesh Bajpai2*, Himanshu Rai3,4, Dalip Kumar Upreti3, Pradeep Kumar Sharma1, Rajan Kumar Gupta4 1Department of Environmental Science Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India 2Division of Plant Sciences Plant and Environmental Research Institute (PERI), Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India 3Lichenology laboratory, Plant Diversity, Systematics and Herbarium Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India 4Department of Botany Pt. Lalit Mohan, Government P.G. College, Rishikesh, Dehradun, India *Corresponding Author: [email protected] (Received August 16, 2017; Accepted, December 6, 2017) Abstract The present study was conducted in the Badrinath holy pilgrimage in Western Himalaya. Lichen collected from seven localities (Badrinath, enroute Bhimpul to Vasudhara, Mana, enroute Vasudhara to Mana, Bhimpul, Vasudhara Glacier and enroute Vasudhara to Bhagirathi Glacier). The highest overall IVI (6.64) was recorded for Rhizoplaca chrysoleuca. The maximum number of lichens have been documented in Badrinath locality (139 spp.) while minimum (6) in enroute Vasudhara to Bhagirathi Glacier. The Badrinath has also express maximum 71 site specific species, while the Vasudhara Glacier has only 2 species. The dominance has been computed maximum (0.17) for enroute Vasudhara to Bhagirathi Glacier while, minimum for the Badrinath (0.01). The lowest Simpson Index value (0.83) has been recorded in enroute Vasudhara to Bhagirathi Glacier while the highest (0.99) in Badrinath. The lowest value of Berger-Parker diversity index (0.03), as well as the highest values of Brillouin, Shannon, Menhinick, Margalef and Fisher alpha diversity indices (7.20, 4.78, 8.03, 24.2 and 100.6 respectively) from the Badrinath locality, designates it as a site of highest species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 1-XXXX
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 15: 56-81. 2016. *pdf effectively published online 25July2016 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Lichens, lichenicolous fungi, and allied fungi of Pipestone National Monument, Minnesota, U.S.A., revisited M.K. ADVAITA, CALEB A. MORSE1,2 AND DOUGLAS LADD3 ABSTRACT. – A total of 154 lichens, four lichenicolous fungi, and one allied fungus were collected by the authors from 2004 to 2015 from Pipestone National Monument (PNM), in Pipestone County, on the Prairie Coteau of southwestern Minnesota. Twelve additional species collected by previous researchers, but not found by the authors, bring the total number of taxa known for PNM to 171. This represents a substantial increase over previous reports for PNM, likely due to increased intensity of field work, and also to the marked expansion of corticolous and anthropogenic substrates since the site was first surveyed in 1899. Reexamination of 116 vouchers deposited in MIN and the PNM herbarium led to the exclusion of 48 species previously reported from the site. Crustose lichens are the most common growth form, comprising 65% of the lichen diversity. Sioux Quartzite provided substrate for 43% of the lichen taxa collected. Saxicolous lichen communities were characterized by sampling four transects on cliff faces and low outcrops. An annotated checklist of the lichens of the site is provided, as well as a list of excluded taxa. We report 24 species (including 22 lichens and two lichenicolous fungi) new for Minnesota: Acarospora boulderensis, A. contigua, A. erythrophora, A. strigata, Agonimia opuntiella, Arthonia clemens, A. muscigena, Aspicilia americana, Bacidina delicata, Buellia tyrolensis, Caloplaca flavocitrina, C. lobulata, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycosphere Notes 225–274: Types and Other Specimens of Some Genera of Ascomycota
    Mycosphere 9(4): 647–754 (2018) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/3 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Mycosphere Notes 225–274: types and other specimens of some genera of Ascomycota Doilom M1,2,3, Hyde KD2,3,6, Phookamsak R1,2,3, Dai DQ4,, Tang LZ4,14, Hongsanan S5, Chomnunti P6, Boonmee S6, Dayarathne MC6, Li WJ6, Thambugala KM6, Perera RH 6, Daranagama DA6,13, Norphanphoun C6, Konta S6, Dong W6,7, Ertz D8,9, Phillips AJL10, McKenzie EHC11, Vinit K6,7, Ariyawansa HA12, Jones EBG7, Mortimer PE2, Xu JC2,3, Promputtha I1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China 3 World Agro Forestry Centre, East and Central Asia, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China 4 Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China 5 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China 6 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 7 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 8 Department Research (BT), Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, BE-1860 Meise, Belgium 9 Direction Générale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Rue A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fungi of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve and Environs
    THE FUNGI OF SLAPTON LEY NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE AND ENVIRONS APRIL 2019 Image © Visit South Devon ASCOMYCOTA Order Family Name Abrothallales Abrothallaceae Abrothallus microspermus CY (IMI 164972 p.p., 296950), DM (IMI 279667, 279668, 362458), N4 (IMI 251260), Wood (IMI 400386), on thalli of Parmelia caperata and P. perlata. Mainly as the anamorph <it Abrothallus parmeliarum C, CY (IMI 164972), DM (IMI 159809, 159865), F1 (IMI 159892), 2, G2, H, I1 (IMI 188770), J2, N4 (IMI 166730), SV, on thalli of Parmelia carporrhizans, P Abrothallus parmotrematis DM, on Parmelia perlata, 1990, D.L. Hawksworth (IMI 400397, as Vouauxiomyces sp.) Abrothallus suecicus DM (IMI 194098); on apothecia of Ramalina fustigiata with st. conid. Phoma ranalinae Nordin; rare. (L2) Abrothallus usneae (as A. parmeliarum p.p.; L2) Acarosporales Acarosporaceae Acarospora fuscata H, on siliceous slabs (L1); CH, 1996, T. Chester. Polysporina simplex CH, 1996, T. Chester. Sarcogyne regularis CH, 1996, T. Chester; N4, on concrete posts; very rare (L1). Trimmatothelopsis B (IMI 152818), on granite memorial (L1) [EXTINCT] smaragdula Acrospermales Acrospermaceae Acrospermum compressum DM (IMI 194111), I1, S (IMI 18286a), on dead Urtica stems (L2); CY, on Urtica dioica stem, 1995, JLT. Acrospermum graminum I1, on Phragmites debris, 1990, M. Marsden (K). Amphisphaeriales Amphisphaeriaceae Beltraniella pirozynskii D1 (IMI 362071a), on Quercus ilex. Ceratosporium fuscescens I1 (IMI 188771c); J1 (IMI 362085), on dead Ulex stems. (L2) Ceriophora palustris F2 (IMI 186857); on dead Carex puniculata leaves. (L2) Lepteutypa cupressi SV (IMI 184280); on dying Thuja leaves. (L2) Monographella cucumerina (IMI 362759), on Myriophyllum spicatum; DM (IMI 192452); isol. ex vole dung. (L2); (IMI 360147, 360148, 361543, 361544, 361546).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Classification of Leotiomycetes
    Mycosphere 10(1): 310–489 (2019) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes Ekanayaka AH1,2, Hyde KD1,2, Gentekaki E2,3, McKenzie EHC4, Zhao Q1,*, Bulgakov TS5, Camporesi E6,7 1Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 2Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 4Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 5Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops, 2/28 Yana Fabritsiusa Street, Sochi 354002, Krasnodar region, Russia 6A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy. 7A.M.B. Circolo Micologico “Giovanni Carini”, C.P. 314 Brescia, Italy. Ekanayaka AH, Hyde KD, Gentekaki E, McKenzie EHC, Zhao Q, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E 2019 – Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes. Mycosphere 10(1), 310–489, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Abstract Leotiomycetes is regarded as the inoperculate class of discomycetes within the phylum Ascomycota. Taxa are mainly characterized by asci with a simple pore blueing in Melzer’s reagent, although some taxa have lost this character. The monophyly of this class has been verified in several recent molecular studies. However, circumscription of the orders, families and generic level delimitation are still unsettled. This paper provides a modified backbone tree for the class Leotiomycetes based on phylogenetic analysis of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, TEF, and RPB2 loci. In the phylogenetic analysis, Leotiomycetes separates into 19 clades, which can be recognized as orders and order-level clades.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Lichens and Allied Fungi of Kathy Stiles Freeland Bibb County Glades Preserve, Alabama, U.S.A
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 18: 420–434. 2019. *pdf effectively published online 2December2019 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Checklist of the lichens and allied fungi of Kathy Stiles Freeland Bibb County Glades Preserve, Alabama, U.S.A. J. KEVIN ENGLAND1, CURTIS J. HANSEN2, JESSICA L. ALLEN3, SEAN Q. BEECHING4, WILLIAM R. BUCK5, VITALY CHARNY6, JOHN G. GUCCION7, RICHARD C. HARRIS8, MALCOLM HODGES9, NATALIE M. HOWE10, JAMES C. LENDEMER11, R. TROY MCMULLIN12, ERIN A. TRIPP13, DENNIS P. WATERS14 ABSTRACT. – The first checklist of lichenized, lichenicolous and lichen-allied fungi from the Kathy Stiles Freeland Bibb County Glades Preserve in Bibb County, Alabama, is presented. Collections made during the 2017 Tuckerman Workshop and additional records from herbaria and online sources are included. Two hundred and thirty-eight taxa in 115 genera are enumerated. Thirty taxa of lichenized, lichenicolous and lichen-allied fungi are newly reported for Alabama: Acarospora fuscata, A. novomexicana, Circinaria contorta, Constrictolumina cinchonae, Dermatocarpon dolomiticum, Didymocyrtis cladoniicola, Graphis anfractuosa, G. rimulosa, Hertelidea pseudobotryosa, Heterodermia pseudospeciosa, Lecania cuprea, Marchandiomyces lignicola, Minutoexcipula miniatoexcipula, Monoblastia rappii, Multiclavula mucida, Ochrolechia trochophora, Parmotrema subsumptum, Phaeographis brasiliensis, Phaeographis inusta, Piccolia nannaria, Placynthiella icmalea, Porina scabrida, Psora decipiens, Pyrenographa irregularis, Ramboldia blochiana, Thyrea confusa, Trichothelium
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2009 the California Lichen Society Seeks to Promote the Appreciation, Conservation and Study of Lichens
    Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Volume 16 No. 2 Winter 2009 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation and study of lichens. The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although the focus is on California. Dues categories (in $US per year): Student and fixed income - $10, Regular - $20 ($25 for foreign members), Family - $25, Sponsor and Libraries - $35, Donor - $50, Benefactor - $100 and Life Membership - $500 (one time) payable to the California Lichen Society, PO Box 7775 #21135 , San Francisco, California 94120-7775. Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, field trips, lectures and workshops. Board Members of the California Lichen Society: President: Erin Martin, shastalichens gmail.com Vice President: Michelle Caisse Secretary: Patti Patterson Treasurer: Cheryl Beyer Editor: Tom Carlberg Committees of the California Lichen Society: Data Base: Bill Hill, chairperson Conservation: Eric Peterson, chairperson Education/Outreach: Erin Martin, chairperson Poster/Mini Guides: Janet Doell, chairperson Events/field trips/workshops: Judy Robertson, chairperson The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1093-9148) is edited by Tom Carlberg, tcarlberg7 yahoo.com. The Bulletin has a review committee including Larry St. Clair, Shirley Tucker, William Sanders, and Richard Moe, and is produced by Eric Peterson. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities. The best way to submit manuscripts is by e-mail attachments or on a CD in the format of a major word processor (DOC or RTF preferred).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi: 7
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2011. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON Volume 115, pp. 45–52 January–March 2011 doi: 10.5248/115.45 Studies in lichens and lichenicolous fungi: 7. More notes on taxa from North America James C. Lendemer*1 & Kerry Knudsen2 1Cryptogamic Herbarium, Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126, USA 2The Herbarium, Dept. of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124, USA Correspondence to *: [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract— Acarospora complanata, Fellhaneropsis myrtillicola, and Lecanora stramineoalbida are reported new for North America north of Mexico. Acarospora superfusa is confirmed as occurring in North America. Biatorella rappii is placed in synonymy with Ramonia microspora. Key words— Appalachian Mountains, Magnusson, Sonoran Desert, SE coastal plain. 1. Acarospora complanata H. Magn., Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 18: 332. 1924. Type: France. Provence-Alpes-Côte D’azur: Var Dist., Massif volcanique de la Courtine, pres Ollisules, 1923, de Crozals (hb. B. de Lesd.[n.v.-presumed destroyed], holotype; UPS! isotype). Acarospora complanata was described from France (Magnusson 1924) and Magnusson recognized it as occurring in Africa and Mexico (Magnusson 1929, 1956). The species forms a brown areolate orbicular thallus with inconspicuous immersed apothecia and an effigurate margin with narrow lobes, a hymenium 80–90 μm high, paraphyses at mid-height mostly 2–2.5 μm in diameter, and a cortex that contains gyrophoric and lecanoric acids (KC+ pink). For a fuller description see Magnusson (1929). Morphologically, the species does not appear related to A. molybdina (Wahlenb.) Trevis, A. macrocyclos Vain., or A.
    [Show full text]