DOCSLIB.ORG

0908399 [2010] RRTA 82 (18 February 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0908399 [2010] RRTA 82 (18 February 2010) 0908399 [2010] RRTA 82 (18 February 2010) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 0908399 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2009/103014 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Guinea TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Tony Caravella DATE: 18 February 2010 PLACE OF DECISION: Perth DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Guinea arrived in Australia [in] May 2009 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (“the Department”) for a Protection (Class XA) visa [in] August 2009. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa [in] October 2009 and notified the applicant of the decision and his review rights by letter [on the same date]. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal [in] October 2009 for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act. RELEVANT LAW 6. Under s.65(1) a visa may be granted only if the decision maker is satisfied that the prescribed criteria for the visa have been satisfied. In general, the relevant criteria for the grant of a protection visa are those in force when the visa application was lodged although some statutory qualifications enacted since then may also be relevant. 7. Section 36(2)(a) of the Act provides that a criterion for a protection visa is that the applicant for the visa is a non-citizen in Australia to whom the Minister is satisfied Australia has protection obligations under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees as amended by the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (together, the Refugees Convention, or the Convention). 8. Further criteria for the grant of a Protection (Class XA) visa are set out in Part 866 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994. Definition of ‘refugee’ 9. Australia is a party to the Refugees Convention and generally speaking, has protection obligations to people who are refugees as defined in Article 1 of the Convention. Article 1A(2) relevantly defines a refugee as any person who: owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it. 10. The High Court has considered this definition in a number of cases, notably Chan Yee Kin v MIEA (1989) 169 CLR 379, Applicant A v MIEA (1997) 190 CLR 225, MIEA v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559, Chen Shi Hai v MIMA (2000) 201 CLR 293, MIMA v Haji Ibrahim (2000) 204 CLR 1, MIMA v Khawar (2002) 210 CLR 1, MIMA v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 222 CLR 1 and Applicant S v MIMA (2004) 217 CLR 387. 11. Sections 91R and 91S of the Act qualify some aspects of Article 1A(2) for the purposes of the application of the Act and the regulations to a particular person. 12. There are four key elements to the Convention definition. First, an applicant must be outside his or her country. 13. Second, an applicant must fear persecution. Under s.91R(1) of the Act persecution must involve “serious harm” to the applicant (s.91R(1)(b)), and systematic and discriminatory conduct (s.91R(1)(c)). The expression “serious harm” includes, for example, a threat to life or liberty, significant physical harassment or ill-treatment, or significant economic hardship or denial of access to basic services or denial of capacity to earn a livelihood, where such hardship or denial threatens the applicant’s capacity to subsist: s.91R(2) of the Act. The High Court has explained that persecution may be directed against a person as an individual or as a member of a group. The persecution must have an official quality, in the sense that it is official, or officially tolerated or uncontrollable by the authorities of the country of nationality. However, the threat of harm need not be the product of government policy; it may be enough that the government has failed or is unable to protect the applicant from persecution. 14. Further, persecution implies an element of motivation on the part of those who persecute for the infliction of harm. People are persecuted for something perceived about them or attributed to them by their persecutors. However the motivation need not be one of enmity, malignity or other antipathy towards the victim on the part of the persecutor. 15. Third, the persecution which the applicant fears must be for one or more of the reasons enumerated in the Convention definition - race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. The phrase “for reasons of” serves to identify the motivation for the infliction of the persecution. The persecution feared need not be solely attributable to a Convention reason. However, persecution for multiple motivations will not satisfy the relevant test unless a Convention reason or reasons constitute at least the essential and significant motivation for the persecution feared: s.91R(1)(a) of the Act. 16. Fourth, an applicant’s fear of persecution for a Convention reason must be a “well- founded” fear. This adds an objective requirement to the requirement that an applicant must in fact hold such a fear. A person has a “well-founded fear” of persecution under the Convention if they have genuine fear founded upon a “real chance” of persecution for a Convention stipulated reason. A fear is well-founded where there is a real substantial basis for it but not if it is merely assumed or based on mere speculation. A “real chance” is one that is not remote or insubstantial or a far-fetched possibility. A person can have a well-founded fear of persecution even though the possibility of the persecution occurring is well below 50 per cent. 17. In addition, an applicant must be unable, or unwilling because of his or her fear, to avail himself or herself of the protection of his or her country or countries of nationality or, if stateless, unable, or unwilling because of his or her fear, to return to his or her country of former habitual residence. 18. Whether an applicant is a person to whom Australia has protection obligations is to be assessed upon the facts as they exist when the decision is made and requires a consideration of the matter in relation to the reasonably foreseeable future. CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE 19. The Tribunal has before it the Department’s file relating to the applicant. The Tribunal also has had regard to the material referred to in the delegate's decision, and other material available to it from a range of sources. Application made to the Department for a Protection Visa 20. The applicant is a [age deleted: s.431(2)] year-old national of Guinea. He was born in [location deleted: s.431(2)], Guinea and declares that he is of the Foulah ethnic group. He declares that he is a [occupation deleted: s.431(2)] by profession. He arrived in Australia [in] May 2009 as the holder of a subclass TH 442 Occupational Trainee visa which provides that he is permitted to remain in Australia until [a date in] February 2011. 21. The applicant lodged a protection visa application which is the subject of this review [in] August 2009. The applicant’s protection claims were set out in response to questions 40 to 45 of Part C of the application forms. The respective responses to each question are set out below. 22. In response to question 40, the applicant states he is seeking protection in Australia so that he does not have to go back to Guinea. 23. In response to question 41, Why did you leave that country? the applicant states: • [Company A] sponsored him in August 2007 to come to Australia as an occupational trainee. He claims he was granted the relevant visa for this [in] February 2009. [In] April 2009, [Company A] sent him a letter advising him the training program was cancelled. He says that he was not told his visa was no longer valid and in his view the visa was still valid and the only thing he needed to enter Australia was to buy a ticket; • He claims he borrowed US$10,000 to buy his air ticket and to have some money for his expenses. He also claims he gave his family US$4,500 out of the US$10,000; • He claims that his family were starving and he was too. He claims they had one meal a day and sometimes nothing. He claims the training program was his only hope for him and for his family to improve their situation. He claims now he is in trouble and scared for his life because he does not know how to pay the money back to the moneylenders.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guinea | Freedom House
    Guinea | Freedom House http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/guinea About Us DONATE Blog Contact Us REGIONS ISSUES Reports Programs Initiatives News Experts Events Donate FREEDOM IN THE WORLD Guinea Guinea Freedom in the World 2012 OVERVIEW: 2012 In July 2011, dissident army officers carried out an unsuccessful SCORES assassination attempt on President Alpha Condé. The run-up to December legislative elections—seen as the final step in cementing STATUS Guinea’s return to civilian rule after a 2008 military coup—was marred by violence and political infighting, including a police crackdown on a Partly September opposition protest in which at least two people were killed. The elections were ultimately postponed due to objections from the Free opposition. FREEDOM RATING Guinea gained independence from France in 1958 and grew increasingly 5.0 impoverished under the repressive, one-party rule of President Ahmed Sékou CIVIL LIBERTIES Touré. After his death in 1984, a military junta led by Lieutenant Colonel Lansana Conté abolished all political parties and the constitution, and began a 5 program of economic liberalization. A new constitution was adopted in 1990. Conté won the country’s first POLITICAL RIGHTS multiparty presidential election in 1993, but international observers said the poll was deeply flawed. Presidential, legislative, and municipal elections over the 5 next 12 years were similarly marred by serious irregularities; all resulted in victories for Conté and the ruling party. Security forces killed more than 130 people during nationwide antigovernment demonstrations in 2007, and martial law was declared. Union leaders agreed to suspend a general strike in exchange for Conté’s pledge to implement political and economic reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea
    Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. Map of Guinea1 1 For the purposes of this report, we will be using the following names for the regions of Guinea: Upper Guinea, Middle Guinea, Lower Guinea, and the Forest Region. Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................1 Proxy Voting and Participation of Executive Summary .........................2 Marginalized Groups ......................43 The Carter Center Election Access for Domestic Observers and Observation Mission in Guinea ...............5 Party Representatives ......................44 The Story of the Guinean Security ................................45 Presidential Elections ........................8 Closing and Counting ......................46 Electoral History and Political Background Tabulation .............................48 Before 2008 ..............................8 Election Dispute Resolution and the From the CNDD Regime to the Results Process ...........................51 Transition Period ..........................9 Disputes Regarding First-Round Results ........53 Chronology of the First and Disputes Regarding Second-Round Results ......54 Second Rounds ...........................10 Conclusion and Recommendations for Electoral Institutions and the Framework for the Future Elections ...........................57
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea: Putting the Transition Back on Track
    GUINEA: PUTTING THE TRANSITION BACK ON TRACK Africa Report N°178 – 23 September 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. A HOTLY DISPUTED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ................................................ 2 A. MISTRUST OF ELECTORAL INSTITUTIONS ..................................................................................... 2 B. ETHNICITY, A POTENT POLITICAL INFLUENCE .............................................................................. 4 1. Ethnicity as a political idea in post-colonial Guinea .................................................................... 4 2. Ethnicity in the 2010 presidential election ................................................................................... 5 III. TAKING POLITICS AND THE MILITARY IN HAND ............................................. 8 A. THE POLITICAL PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE “CHANGE”: A HETEROGENEOUS GROUP .............. 8 B. IS THE ARMY UNDER CONTROL? .................................................................................................. 9 IV. THE REFORMS .............................................................................................................. 13 A. REFORM OF THE SECURITY SECTOR – SLOW PROGRESS ............................................................ 13 B. GOOD ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE – AN END OR A MEANS? ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2008 | Guinea Country Report
    BTI 2008 | Guinea Country Report Status Index 1-10 3.72 # 109 of 125 Democracy 1-10 3.98 # 88 of 125 Market Economy 1-10 3.46 # 116 of 125 Management Index 1-10 2.62 # 113 of 125 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI) 2008. The BTI is a global ranking of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economic systems as well as the quality of political management in 125 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. The BTI is a joint project of the Bertelsmann Stiftung and the Center for Applied Policy Research (C•A•P) at Munich University. More on the BTI at http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/ Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2008 — Guinea Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2007. © 2007 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2008 | Guinea 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 9.4 HDI 0.45 GDP p.c. $ 2,060 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 2.2 HDI rank of 177 160 Gini Index 38.6 Life expectancy years 54 UN Education Index 0.34 Poverty3 % - Urban population % 33.0 Gender equality2 - Aid per capita $ 21.0 Sources: UNDP, Human Development Report 2006 | The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2007 | OECD Development Assistance Committee 2006. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate 1990-2005. (2) Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Autocratic President General Lansana Conté, who came to power in 1984 by a military coup d’état, has been seriously ill with diabetes and leukemia and probably amnesia for several years, leaving him unable to govern his country.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Agency, and the State in Guinea
    Women, Agency, and the State in Guinea This book examines how women in Guinea articulate themselves politically within and outside institutional politics. It documents the everyday practices that local female actors adopt to deal with the continuous economic, political, and social insecurities that emerge in times of political transformations. Carole Ammann argues that women’s political articulations in Muslim Guinea do not primarily take place within women’s associations or institu- tional politics such as political parties; but instead women’s silent forms of politics manifest in their daily agency, that is, when they make a living, study, marry, meet friends, raise their children, and do household chores. The book also analyses the relationship between the female population and the local authorities, and discusses when and why women’s claim making enjoys legiti- macy in the eyes of other men and women, as well as representatives of ‘tra- ditional’ authorities and the local government. Paying particular attention to intersectional perspectives, this book will be of interest to scholars of African studies, social anthropology, political anthropology, the anthropology of gender, urban anthropology, gender stu- dies, and Islamic studies. Carole Ammann is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Amster- dam, the Netherlands. Routledge Studies on Gender and Sexuality in Africa 1. The Tunisian Women’s Rights Movement From Nascent Activism to Influential Power-broking Jane D. Tchaicha and Khédija Arfaoui 2. Disability and Sexuality in Zimbabwe Voices from the Periphery Christine Peta 3. Love, Sex and Teenage Sexual Cultures in South Africa 16 Turning 17 Deevia Bhana 4. African Women, ICT and Neoliberal Politics The Challenge of Gendered Digital Divides to People-Centered Governance Assata Zerai 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinee : Remettre La Transition Sur Les Rails
    GUINEE : REMETTRE LA TRANSITION SUR LES RAILS Rapport Afrique N°178 – 23 septembre 2011 TABLE DES MATIERES SYNTHESE ET RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. UNE ELECTION PRÉSIDENTIELLE TRES DISPUTÉE .......................................... 2 A. L’ABSENCE DE CONFIANCE DANS LES INSTITUTIONS ELECTORALES .............................................. 2 B. L’ETHNICITÉ, UNE IDEE POLITIQUE FORTE .................................................................................... 4 1. L’ethnicité comme idée politique dans la Guinée postcoloniale ................................................ 4 2. L’ethnicité dans l’élection présidentielle de 2010 ....................................................................... 5 III. LA PRISE EN MAIN DU POLITIQUE ET DU MILITAIRE ..................................... 8 A. LE PERSONNEL POLITIQUE DU « CHANGEMENT » : UNE STRUCTURE COMPOSITE ........................... 8 B. UNE ARMÉE SOUS CONTRÔLE ? .................................................................................................. 10 IV. LES REFORMES ............................................................................................................ 14 A. LA REFORME DU SECTEUR DE LA SECURITÉ, UN LENT PROGRES .................................................. 14 B. LA BONNE GOUVERNANCE ECONOMIQUE ET FINANCIERE, FIN OU MOYEN ? ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea: Situation Analysis and Outlook
    writenet is a network of researchers and writers on human rights, forced migration, ethnic and political conflict WRITENET writenet is the resource base of practical management (uk) e-mail: [email protected] independent analysis GUINEA: SITUATION ANALYSIS AND OUTLOOK A Writenet Report by Paul Melly commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Emergency and Technical Support Service August 2008 Caveat: Writenet papers are prepared mainly on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. The papers are not, and do not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The views expressed in the paper are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Writenet or Practical Management. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................. ii 1 Introduction........................................................................................3 1.1 The Present Situation ..................................................................................3 1.2 Some Background Data...............................................................................4 1.3 Outline of Events since 2006 .......................................................................5 2 Overview of the Crisis .......................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • “We Have Lived in Darkness” RIGHTS a Human Rights Agenda for Guinea’S New Government WATCH
    Guinea HUMAN “We Have Lived in Darkness” RIGHTS A Human Rights Agenda for Guinea’s New Government WATCH “We Have Lived in Darkness” A Human Rights Agenda for Guinea’s New Government Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-772-8 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org May 2011 ISBN: 1-56432-772-8 “We Have Lived in Darkness” A Human Rights Agenda for Guinea’s New Government Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 4 To the New Government of Guinea and President .................................................................. 4 To Address Accountability for Past Abuses and Create a Culture of Respect for Human Rights ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea - Researched and Compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on Tuesday 26 January 2016
    Guinea - Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on Tuesday 26 January 2016 Information on the UFDG party including: treatment of; are they peaceful or militaristic A report issued in November 2015 by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project points out that: “Guinea witnessed a dramatic spike in political unrest in October with levels of political violence surpassing those seen during the depth of the Ebola crisis. The primary cause of this instability is the presidential election, which took place on 11 October, which pitted incumbent Alpha Conde with long-time challenger Cellou Dalein Diallo. Conde and his Rally of the Guinean People party (RPG) won 57.9% while Diallo and the Union of Democratic Forces of Guinea (UDFG) won only 31.4% of the vote…” (Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (5 November 2015) Guinea — November 2015 Update). The Agence France Presse in October 2015 states: “At least two people were killed and a score hurt in clashes between rival political parties ahead of Guinea's presidential election Sunday, the head of the gendarmerie told AFP. The clashes near the city's large Madina market Thursday between supporters of incumbent President Alpha Conde, and leading opposition rival Cellou Dalein Diallo, left two dead, General Ibrahima Balde, the gendarmerie chief-of-staff, told AFP” (Agence France Presse (9 October 2015) At least two dead in Guinea pre- election violence). This document also states that: “At the Madina market, spare parts traders from Conde's Malinke people blocked access to Fulani traders close to Diallo's UFDG party after seeing their wares go up in smoke on Thursday.
    [Show full text]
  • The September 28 Massacre and Rapes by Security Forces in Guinea
    Bloody Monday The September 28 Massacre and Rapes by Security Forces in Guinea Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-584-9 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org December 2009 1-56432-584-9 Bloody Monday The September 28 Massacre and Rapes by Security Forces in Guinea Map of Guinea .................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Conakry .................................................................................................................. 2 Map of the September 28 Stadium and Surrounding Area ................................................... 3 Summary ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2011
    United Nations A/HRC/16/26 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Guinea* Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 13/21 inviting the High Commissioner for Human Rights to submit a report on the situation of human rights in Guinea to the sixteenth session of the Council. This report covers the period from April to 31 December 2010. The final report of the International Commission of Inquiry mandated to establish the facts and circumstances of the events of 28 September 2009 in Guinea recommended, inter alia, that the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) “monitor the situation in Guinea, at least in 2010, during which the country is likely to remain unstable, by an appropriately significant presence, in both quantitative and qualitative terms, to serve as a deterrent to potential violators of international law.” As a follow-up to this recommendation, on 4 May 2010, OHCHR and the Government of Guinea signed a host country agreement relating to the establishment of an OHCHR Office. Since its establishment in May 2010, the OHCHR office in Guinea has been monitoring and reporting on the situation of human rights throughout the country. During the six first months of its operation, the Office focused on the elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Stopping Guinea's Slide
    STOPPING GUINEA'S SLIDE Africa Report N°94 – 14 June 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. POLITICAL REFORMS: HOW REAL? .................................................................... 3 A. DIPLOMATIC OPTIMISM, POPULAR PESSIMISM ......................................................................3 B. THE MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS .................................................................................................3 C. THE OPPOSITION ...................................................................................................................4 III. THE PRESIDENT'S HEALTH AND SUCCESSION QUESTIONS........................ 6 A. THREE SCENARIOS ................................................................................................................6 B. THE COMPETITORS................................................................................................................7 C. IMPLICATIONS FOR REFORM..................................................................................................9 D. A WAY FORWARD ................................................................................................................9 1. Political reforms and sovereignty ..............................................................................9 2. The timetable for succession....................................................................................10
    [Show full text]