Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens E-194 11-03 Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens John A. Jackman Professor and Extension Entomologist The Texas A&M University System Vegetable gardening can be an entertaining pas- eration time, about a week under good condi- time and a source of fresh, homegrown produce. tions, and their numbers can increase rapidly. Producing your own vegetables adds to the When pests seem to appear in large numbers enjoyment of consuming them and may also be almost overnight, they have either flown in or cheaper than purchasing produce. are reproducing rapidly. However, growing your own vegetables can be As insects grow, they change size and shape. challenging. One of the challenges is successful- This process is called metamorphosis. Some ly dealing with pests, especially insects. This insects damage plants in both the immature and publication discusses some of the management adult stages. Because insects change form, they alternatives that vegetable gardeners can use to may be difficult to identify and their damage deal with insects and other pests and provides may change with them. Small caterpillars may information on insecticides that are registered barely scrape the surface of a leaf, while larger for use in home gardens. caterpillars may eat great chunks of leaves. An insect’s mouthparts often determine the type Understanding Insects of damage expected from a pest. Insects with Although there are about 30,000 species of sucking mouthparts feed by piercing leaves or insects in Texas, fewer than a hundred are rou- fruit. Damage appears as pock marks or mottled tine pests in vegetable gardens. Actually, most leaves. Insects with chewing mouthparts chew insects in gardens are either incidental or bene- holes in plant tissue. Recognizing how an insect ficial organisms that contribute to pollination, feeds also helps a gardener select the proper the balance of nature or recycling of organic insecticides — stomach poisons for chewing matter. A garden with an abundant supply of insects or contact poisons for sucking insects. insects may actually be quite healthy and pro- ductive. However, some pest species can reduce Plan Ahead the quantity and/or quality of the vegetables When planning a vegetable garden, anticipate produced or transmit plant diseases from one the pests that may occur later. Consider the plant to another. Consider control measures management practices for specific pests before when insects threaten a garden. they become a problem. Implement the manage- Identify the insects in your garden to determine ment plan in plenty of time to deal with the whether they are beneficial or pest species. pest problems. Use past experience as a guide to Learn to recognize the common insects in your anticipating pests for the upcoming season. area, especially the common pests, and the signs of pest damage, and inspect your garden at least Integrated Pest Management once per week to detect pests. Integrated pest management — IPM — is a phi- Insect pests can enter vegetable gardens by losophy of managing pests by using a combina- walking or flying. Flight especially allows many tion of control techniques. IPM balances the insects great mobility, and their movement in goals of economic production and environmen- large numbers is possible. Moreover, certain tal stewardship when implementing control pests such as aphids and mites have a short gen- practices. IPM is the overriding strategy for 3 most of production agriculture today, and it is many modern varieties is not well known rapidly being adopted in urban environments as because of the need to test new varieties as they well. become available in the marketplace. Monitoring or scouting crops for the presence Recently, researchers have altered the genetic and abundance of pests is an important part of material of some field crops and vegetables such IPM. IPM programs typically reserve the use of as tomatoes, potatoes and corn. These are called insecticides for situations where a pest is known transgenic plants. Dramatic results can be achiev- to be present and the numbers are high enough ed when genes for resistance to insects are incor- to justify the cost of control practices. porated in the new varieties. Most of the insect- resistant transgenic vegetable varieties incorporate Although many other insect control practices genes of the bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis, mak- can be implemented as part of an IPM program, ing them resistant to caterpillar pests. This resist- the use of insecticides is generally included as a ance is an antibiosis effect that inhibits the control option. When alternate control practices growth of caterpillars on these plants. Resistant are substituted for insecticides, the IPM transgenic vegetable varieties are expected to approach is much like organic gardening. become increasingly available to homeowners. Many of the control practices available for home vegetable gardeners are categorized in the fol- Biological Control lowing sections. Biological control is the use of one organism to control another. Three approaches to biological Cultural Control control have been successfully implemented: im- Cultural control consists of physical garden portation, conservation and augmentation. Impor- management practices that reduce pest impact. tation requires bringing a parasite or predator This may include crop rotation, cultivation, from a foreign country into our country to con- weed management, water management and trol a pest species. Importation is highly regulat- proper fertilizer use. For some pests, it is effec- ed and is generally beyond the scope of home tive to interrupt the life cycle of the pests by vegetable gardeners, although we all benefit from leaving acreage fallow for a period or by rotat- importation programs performed by research ing crops. Always remove plant debris from a groups. garden area because it can harbor pests. Control The conservation approach to biological control weeds because they can attract insects that may is encouraging natural enemies that are already feed on vegetables. Some pests of landscape present in an area. Conservation methods are plants may also move into vegetable gardens. useful in home gardens. They include planting Host Plant Resistance nectar-producing flowers that provide food for parasites and avoiding unnecessary pesticide Vegetable varieties differ in susceptibility to applications. Conservation also includes selecting insect pests, a response called host plant resist- pesticides that are toxic to a pest but relatively ance (HPR). Resistance can be expressed as tol- non-toxic to beneficial insects. erance, non-preference or antibiosis. Tolerance is the ability of a plant to grow and produce Augmentation is the release of additional preda- even with insect damage. Non- preference is tors and parasites, such as ladybird beetles, prey- exhibited when an insect chooses to feed on or ing mantids and parasitic wasps, into the natural lay eggs on alternate varieties or host plants. populations of biological control organisms. How- Antibiosis is the ability of a plant to kill or slow ever, many of these organisms occur naturally in development of a pest, usually with chemicals the environment, and any additional benefit from that occur naturally in the plant. such releases may be marginal. There are many commercial sources of biological control agents. Extensive trials are needed to understand the HPR of vegetables. Most variety selection Biological control should not be considered an emphasizes other factors, such as appearance, instant solution to pest problems. Generally, a taste and production volume. HPR status of sound biological control program needs to be 4 supported by careful study. Proper identification Labeled insecticides may or may not be effec- of pests, careful selection of beneficial organisms tive in killing pests that are mentioned on a and increased monitoring are all necessary for product label. The number of products available success. Biological control solutions cannot be for use in home vegetable gardens and the rapid implemented for all pest situations because bio- turnover in the market makes it difficult to logical control agents are not available for every know the efficacy of products available to gar- pest. deners. The response of pests can also change as they become tolerant or as environmental fac- Mechanical Control tors interact with a chemical. Furthermore, pes- Mechanical control is the use of physical means ticides may fail because a user did not read the to reduce the number of insects or their dam- label and/or calibrate the application equipment age. Mechanical methods include the use of bar- and, consequently, applied the wrong amount of riers, covers, high pressure water sprays and product. hand picking of pests. The USER is always the person responsible for Barriers come in many shapes and sizes to pre- the proper use of any pesticide. It is illegal to vent the movement of pests onto plants. use a product in a manner or situation that is Cardboard or plastic cylinders around the base not defined on a pesticide label. of transplants are an example of a type of barri- Product labels may carry a number of restric- er that discourages cutworms and other soil tions that must be considered by the user. inhabiting pests from attacking transplants. Labels include limits on product rate, number of Cloth or plastic screening can prevent the inva- applications per season, specific crops, method sion of pests into a newly planted garden. of applications, days from last application to Screening may raise the temperature of a plant- harvest and other items. There are numerous ing bed, often an additional benefit. Screening is trade names for generic insecticides, and special most useful for young plants and seedlings that restrictions may be noted on a specific label. Be are most susceptible to pest attack. sure to read the label for additional restrictions High pressure water sprays are another mechan- and follow the directions carefully. ical control method. These are most effective The EPA approves pesticides for use on a partic- against small, soft-bodied pests such as aphids.
Recommended publications
  • Mitochondrial Toxicity of Triclosan on Mammalian Cells
    Toxicology Reports 2 (2015) 624–637 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicology Reports j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxrep Mitochondrial toxicity of triclosan on mammalian cells a,∗,1 a,1 b,1 c Charmaine Ajao , Maria A. Andersson , Vera V. Teplova , Szabolcs Nagy , d e f g Carl G. Gahmberg , Leif C. Andersson , Maria Hautaniemi , Balazs Kakasi , h a Merja Roivainen , Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen a Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, POB 56, FI-00014, Finland b Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, RAS, Puschino, Moscow Region, Russia c Department of Animal Science and Animal Husbandry, University of Pannonia, Georgikon Faculty, Deak F. u.,16, H8360 Keszthely, Hungary d Dept. of Bio- and Environmental Sciences, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland e Dept. of Pathology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland f Finnish Food Safety Authority (EVIRA), Research and Laboratory Department, Veterinary Virology Research Unit, Mustialankatu 3, FI 00790 Helsinki, Finland g Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, H-8200 Veszprem, Hungary h National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Virology, Mannerheimintie 166, 00300 Helsinki, Finland a r t a b i c s t l r e i n f o a c t Article history: Effects of triclosan (5-chloro-2 -(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) on mammalian cells were Received 28 January 2015 investigated using human peripheral blood mono nuclear cells (PBMC), keratinocytes Received in revised form 29 March 2015 (HaCaT), porcine spermatozoa and kidney tubular epithelial cells (PK-15), murine pan- Accepted 30 March 2015 creatic islets (MIN-6) and neuroblastoma cells (MNA) as targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii on Two Foliage Plants, Dwarf Brassaia Diazinon Plant After Spots
    in Japan and England will be given by Tosh Fu- {Brassaia arboricola) and Dwarf Ti {Cordyline chikami of O.M. Scotts and Ray McMicken of B. terminalis 'Madameandre') to determine their Hayman Co., respectively. phototoxicity to selected insecticides and acara- cides. Plants, growing in 6-inch pots, were treated Farwest Show by submerging the aerial portions of the plant in Farwest Nursery, Garden, and Supply Show water suspensions of 7 pesticides for 15seconds. will be September 8-10, 1975, at the Memorial Granular formulations of 2 pesticides were ap Coliseum in Portland, Oregon. For information plied to the soil surface. Materials, at 2X stand contact: Farwest Nursery Show, Suite GA-7, ard rates, were as follows: 222 S.W. Harrison, Protland, OR. 97201. Amount formulation per: ASHS The 72d annual meeting of ASHS (American Material and formulation 1-gallon water 6-inch pot Society for Horticultural Science) will be held in chlorobenzilate 4E 2t — Honolulu, September 8 to 13, 1975, at the dicofol (Kelthane) 35WP 2T - Sheraton-Waikiki Hotel. Meeting concurrently Pentac 50WP 2T — with ASHS will be the American Horticulture carbaryl (Sevin) 50WP 2T - Society. The University of Hawaii will host the diazinon AG500 (48% EC) 2t - meeting with Dr. Richard Bullock, general chair dimethoate (Cygon) 2E 2t — man. Dr. Henry Nakasone will serve as assistant Volck Oil Supreme 2T - general chairman, Dr. Phil Parvin as local arrange aldicarb (Temik) 10G - 1.5t ments chairman, and Dr. Richard Criley as pro disulfoton (Di-Syston) 15G - 1.5t gram chairman. Neighbor island tours will be untreated controls - conducted following the meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Organophosphorous Insecticide Use Among Private Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2012) 22, 584 -- 592 & 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/12 www.nature.com/jes ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lifetime organophosphorous insecticide use among private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study Jane A. Hoppin1, Stuart Long2, David M. Umbach3, Jay H. Lubin4, Sarah E. Starks5, Fred Gerr5, Kent Thomas6, Cynthia J. Hines7, Scott Weichenthal8, Freya Kamel1, Stella Koutros9, Michael Alavanja9, Laura E. Beane Freeman9 and Dale P. Sandler1 Organophosphorous insecticides (OPs) are the most commonly used insecticides in US agriculture, but little information is available regarding specific OP use by individual farmers. We describe OP use for licensed private pesticide applicators from Iowa and North Carolina in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) using lifetime pesticide use data from 701 randomly selected male participants collected at three time periods. Of 27 OPs studied, 20 were used by 41%. Overall, 95% had ever applied at least one OP. The median number of different OPs used was 4 (maximum ¼ 13). Malathion was the most commonly used OP (74%) followed by chlorpyrifos (54%). OP use declined over time. At the first interview (1993--1997), 68% of participants had applied OPs in the past year; by the last interview (2005--2007), only 42% had. Similarly, median annual application days of OPs declined from 13.5 to 6 days. Although OP use was common, the specific OPs used varied by state, time period, and individual. Much of the variability in OP use was associated with the choice of OP, rather than the frequency or duration of application.
    [Show full text]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Disulfoton When EPA concluded the organophosphate (OP) cumulative risk assessment in July 2006, all tolerance reassessment and reregistration eligibility decisions for individual OP pesticides were considered complete. OP Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs), therefore, are considered completed REDs. OP tolerance reassessment decisions (TREDs) also are considered completed. Combined PDF document consists of the following: • Finalization of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) and Interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for the Organophosphate Pesticides, and Completion of the Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration Eligibility Process for the Organophosphate Pesticides (July 31, 2006) • Disulfoton IRED UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM DATE: July 31, 2006 SUBJECT: Finalization of Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decisions (IREDs) and Interim Tolerance Reassessment and Risk Management Decisions (TREDs) for the Organophosphate Pesticides, and Completion of the Tolerance Reassessment and Reregistration Eligibility Process for the Organophosphate Pesticides FROM: Debra Edwards, Director Special Review and Reregistration Division Office of Pesticide Programs TO: Jim Jones, Director Office of Pesticide Programs As you know, EPA has completed its assessment of the cumulative risks
    [Show full text]
  • Case Report - Disulfoton Poisoning of Beef Cattle
    PEER REVIEWED Case Report - Disulfoton Poisoning of Beef Cattle Gene A Niles, DVM; Sandra Morgan, DVM, MS, DABVT Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 Abstract during World War II.2,3,9 These compounds are among the most toxic chemical warfare agents known. 2 Use of A herd of beef cattle routinely fed cotton industry OP insecticides in agriculture increased dramatically by-products was poisoned by disulfoton-treated cotton following the war, with great economic benefit to all seed that was disposed in cotton gin trash. Disulfoton aspects of the industry. Although still in use, the amount is an organophosphorus insecticide. Eighteen of 48 ani­ of disulfoton used in agriculture has significantly de­ mals died. Blood acetylcholinesterase (AChE) levels clined since the 1970s.11 were used to determine clearance of disulfoton from the Disulfoton is used in agriculture for insect control.11 surviving animals, and to determine when the animals One example of its use is the impregnation of seed grain could be sold. At 36 days post-exposure three animals, with disulfoton to control insect damage during stor­ although asymptomatic, hadAChE levels that suggested age, planting and germination. Disulfoton and captan, persistentAChE inhibition. At 77 days following initial a fungicide oflow toxicity (rat oral LD50-9000 mg/kg),1 exposure, AChE levels were within normal limits. are the active ingredients of Di-Syston®.a Disulfoton has been administered orally to calves Resume at 0.11 mg/lb (0.25 mg/kg) and yearlings at 0.22 mg/lb (0.5 mg/kg) without toxic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Disulfoton CAS #: 298-04-4
    Review Date: 10/20/2013 disulfoton CAS #: 298-04-4 Type Organophosphate insecticide. Controls Selective insecticide especially effective on sucking insects - aphids, beetles, billbugs, borers, grasshoppers, leafhoppers, leafminers, mealybugs, midge, mites, moths, psyllids, scale, thrips, webworm, wireworm, and whiteflies. Mode of Action Systemic insecticide that is absorbed through plant roots and is an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor in insects. Thurston County Review Summary: The insecticide active ingredient disulfotton is rated high in hazard and products containing it fail Thurston County's pesticide review criteria. Disulfoton is rated high in hazard for its mutagenic potential. Risk to humans and wildlife from the use of disulfoton insecticides is rated moderate for the only remaining EPA registered product. According to the EPA's January 2010 registration review decision document for disulfoton, the registrants of all pesticide products containing disulfoton were voluntarily cancelled. No new products will be manufactured but existing products can be sold (Reference 3). As of the date of this review, the only existing product containing disulfoton registered for use in the states of Washington and Oregon has the EPA registration number 72155-49, which is a granular product for use on residential ornamentals including rose bushes, shrubs, and flowerbeds. MOBILITY Property Value Reference Value Rating Water Solubility (mg/L) 25 4 Moderate - low Soil Sorption (Kd=mL/g) Value not found Organic Sorption (Koc=mL/g) 383 to 888 1 Moderate - high Mobility Summary: Disulfoton is not very soluble in water and is expected to adhere moderately to organic soil. The hazard for disulfoton to move off the site of application with rain or irrigation water is rated moderate if the product is left on the surface soil, and low if it is incorporated into the soil and watered in.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Chemical P026 1-(O-Chlorophenyl)Thiourea P081 1
    Code Chemical P026 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P081 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate (R) P042 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, (R)- P067 1,2-Propylenimine P185 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)- carbonyl]oxime 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a,-hexahydro-, P004 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5alpha,8alpha,8abeta)- 1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10-hexa- chloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-, P060 (1alpha,4alpha, 4abeta,5beta,8beta,8abeta)- P002 1-Acetyl-2-thiourea P048 2,4-Dinitrophenol P051 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth [2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9 -hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2abeta,3alpha,6alpha,6abeta,7 beta, 7aalpha)-, & metabolites 2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9- hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a- P037 octahydro-, (1aalpha,2beta,2aalpha,3beta,6beta,6aalpha,7 beta, 7aalpha)- P045 2-Butanone, 3,3-dimethyl-1-(methylthio)-, O-[methylamino)carbonyl] oxime P034 2-Cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1- phenylbutyl)-, & salts, when present at P001 concentrations greater than 0.3% P069 2-Methyllactonitrile P017 2-Propanone, 1-bromo- P005 2-Propen-1-ol P003 2-Propenal P102 2-Propyn-1-ol P007 3(2H)-Isoxazolone, 5-(aminomethyl)- P027 3-Chloropropionitrile P047 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, & salts P059 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro- 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P008 4-Aminopyridine P008 4-Pyridinamine P007 5-(Aminomethyl)-3-isoxazolol 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Biorational and Natural Products for Vegetable Crop Management in Commercial Market Gardens and Home Gardens
    Report to the Ohio IPM Program on a Vegetable Team Project funded by the Ohio IPM Block Grant Program, 2005 Title: Evaluation of biorational and natural products for vegetable crop management in commercial market gardens and home gardens Investigators: Celeste Welty (entomologist), Sally Miller (plant pathologist), Doug Doohan (weed scientist); Mark Bennett, Matt Kleinhenz, Bob Precheur (horticulturists). Background: The insect pests and diseases that affect vegetable crops are the same whether grown on large farms for commercial production or on small diversified farms or home gardens, but the management tactics preferred by growers are often different for the different scale operations. Many market gardeners prefer to avoid using conventional pesticides because of concern about human safety and environmental contamination. During the past few years, many biorational crop protection products have become available. While it is known that biorational products are safer to humans than conventional pesticides, it is not known whether they are effective in controlling the target pests that they claim to control. In addition to products for insect and disease control, there are many products that promote plant growth, such as microbial soil inoculants. There is little to no unbiased data available on efficacy of these products. This deficit is a limiting factor in formulating up-to-date extension recommendations for market gardens and home gardens. This project was an important first step in the development of a set of recommended garden IPM tactics that will include cultural controls to prevent or delay pest problems, along with biological controls and selective chemical controls. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of biorational products that are available for vegetable crop management, in comparison with standard conventional materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Triclosan on the Functioning of Liver Mitochondria And
    The Journal of Membrane Biology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-019-00099-w Efect of Triclosan on the Functioning of Liver Mitochondria and Permeability of Erythrocyte Membranes of Marsh Frog (Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771)) Mikhail V. Dubinin1 · Kirill S. Tenkov1 · Anton O. Svinin1 · Victor N. Samartsev1 · Konstantin N. Belosludtsev1,2 Received: 28 June 2019 / Accepted: 24 September 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract The paper examines the efects of the antimicrobial agent triclosan on the functioning of the liver mitochondria of marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus (Pallas, 1771)). It was established that triclosan inhibits DNP-stimulated respiration of mito- chondria and decreases respiratory control ratio. In addition, triclosan causes the collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential on both types of substrates. Such an action of triclosan can be mediated by both a protonophore efect and suppres- sion of the activity of complex II and combined activity of complexes II + III (and, to a lesser degree, the combined activity of complexes I + III) of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. It is shown that high concentrations of triclosan enhance the production of hydrogen peroxide during the oxidation of substrates of the complex I by mitochondria, and decrease it in the case of succinate oxidation. It is found that triclosan is able to induce nonspecifc permeability of the liver mitochondria of these amphibians, as well as the plasma membrane of erythrocytes. The possible mechanisms of triclosan efect on marsh frog liver mitochondria and red blood cells are discussed. Graphic Abstract Keywords Triclosan · Toxicology · Mitochondria · Pelophylax ridibundus · Erythrocytes · Membrane permeability Abbreviations TCS Triclosan CsA Cyclosporine * Mikhail V.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR)
    Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR) Name of Process: Status: Gas-Phase Chemical Reduction (GPCR) A Commercial system operated in Australia for more than 5 years, treating Vendor: more than 2,500 tons of PCB’s, DDT and other POPs. In 1999 a full-scale test ELI Eco Logic International Inc. on HCB was conducted using the commercial plant. Web site: http://www.ecologic.ca Eco Logic’s partners in Japan have recently built a semi-mobile GPCR plant for Applicable Pesticides and related the treatment of PCB wastes, which will be operational in 2003. POPs wastes: Pesticides such as Hexachlorobenzene, In combination with Foster Wheeler and Kvaerner the company is DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, HCB’s, DDT, PCB’s, participating at present in the ACWA (Army Chemical Weapons Assessment) dioxins and furans and other POPs. Program for the destruction of chemical warfare agents. Eco Logic has partnered with Torftech Inc. for the treatment of soils and sediments at rates of up to 20 tons per hour. Eco Logic has also been selected by UNIDO for a pilot project for treatment of 1000 tons of PCB wastes in Slovakia. Additional approvals received: -for PCB and dioxin waste in Japan -for PCB’s TSCA permit in USA -for PCB’s and other toxic compounds in the Province of Ontario (Canada) Technology description: Eco Logic’s GPCR technology involves the gas-phase chemical reduction of organic compounds by hydrogen at a temperature of 850°C or higher. Chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as HCB, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) and other POPs, are chemically reduced to methane and hydrogen chloride (HCl).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances
    List of Class 1 Designated Chemical Substances *1:CAS numbers are to be solely as references. They may be insufficient or lacking, in case there are multiple chemical substances. No. Specific Class 1 CAS No. (PRTR Chemical (*1) Name Law) Substances 1 - zinc compounds(water-soluble) 2 79-06-1 acrylamide 3 140-88-5 ethyl acrylate 4 - acrylic acid and its water-soluble salts 5 2439-35-2 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate 6 818-61-1 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate 7 141-32-2 n-butyl acrylate 8 96-33-3 methyl acrylate 9 107-13-1 acrylonitrile 10 107-02-8 acrolein 11 26628-22-8 sodium azide 12 75-07-0 acetaldehyde 13 75-05-8 acetonitrile 14 75-86-5 acetone cyanohydrin 15 83-32-9 acenaphthene 16 78-67-1 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile 17 90-04-0 o-anisidine 18 62-53-3 aniline 19 82-45-1 1-amino-9,10-anthraquinone 20 141-43-5 2-aminoethanol 21 1698-60-8 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenylpyridazin-3(2H)-one; chloridazon 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-cyano- 22 120068-37-3 4[(trifluoromethyl)sulfinyl]pyrazole; fipronil 23 123-30-8 p-aminophenol 24 591-27-5 m-aminophenol 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-methylthio-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one; 25 21087-64-9 metribuzin 26 107-11-9 3-amino-1-propene 27 41394-05-2 4-amino-3-methyl-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one; metamitron 28 107-18-6 allyl alcohol 29 106-92-3 1-allyloxy-2,3-epoxypropane 30 - n-alkylbenzenesulfonic acid and its salts(alkyl C=10-14) 31 - antimony and its compounds 32 120-12-7 anthracene 33 1332-21-4 asbestos ○ 34 4098-71-9 3-isocyanatomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl isocyanate 35 78-84-2 isobutyraldehyde
    [Show full text]