Beyondidentity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Beyond Identity: Social Relations for International Conict and Cooperation Dissertation Presented in partial fulllment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of e Ohio State University By Kathleen E. Powers, B.S., B.S., M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science e Ohio State University Dissertation Committee: Richard K. Herrmann, Advisor Christopher Gelpi Kathleen McGraw William Minozzi ©Copyright by Kathleen E. Powers Abstract How can groups overcome conict and cooperate with one another in international pol- itics? Strong group identities contribute to conict — from nationalism driving WWII to sectarian ethnic groups inciting violence in Iraq. As a result, scholars oen turn to the seemingly simple solution of bringing competing groups together as a single community — uniting rivals France and Germany under a common European identity is meant to sustain cooperation on the continent. I argue that this approach is fraught with difficulty: nation- alism within a state promotes militaristic foreign policy, and communities formed among heterogeneous states are both difficult to maintain and potentially problematic as trust only extends to representative community members. I argue that different social relations shape the meaning, and ultimately the effects, of identity. On one hand individuals can understand their identity group as a community, where maintaining the group’s unity requires a separation between “us” and “them” and justies intergroup conict but not cooperation. On the other, relations can be dened by equality and reciprocity, among individuals who see themselves as one of a set of equals that compose the group. e latter produces a conceptually and practically distinct understand- ing of social identity — one that can accommodate diversity not only within but also outside of the group. I argue that bridging competing groups with equality produces cooperation while avoiding the conictual pitfalls associated with strong community identities. ii I test this argument and the microfoundations of cooperation and conict in three em- pirical chapters. e rst two present the results of online survey experiments, and demon- strate that the relationship between strong national identities and foreign policy preferences depends upon the relational content that underlies the national identity. e third analyzes public opinion data from a cross-national survey of individuals in European states to probe the type of transnational identity that fosters cooperation in a transnational group. Across the three studies, I nd that identities based on equality promote cooperative ten- dencies, while identities based on community can produce more conictual preferences. iii Acknowledgements My road to the PhD has been full of many twists and turns, most of which I would not have been able to navigate without the support and advice of the people who surround me. I owe a great debt to my advisor, Rick Herrmann. He has supported me since he per- suaded me to come to Ohio State years ago. Rick has been a reliable sounding board for ideas, and I have learned and grown as a scholar in each of our many conversations. His connection to foreign policy and constant search for concrete examples of theory in action has changed the way I write and approach my work — for the better. I thank him for being as generous with his time as he is with feedback, and will continue to hone research throughout my career with his advice in the background. Chris Gelpi arrived in Columbus at precisely the right time to shape how I thought about my dissertation. I thank him for believing in the project from its earliest stages, and for the thoughtful insights that have had a profound impact on the direction of this project. He taught me to sharpen the way that I discuss my contributions, and his infectious enthusiasm leaves me newly invigorated about my work each time I meet with him. I thank Kathleen McGraw for spurring my enthusiasm for political psychology. I learned most of what I know about public opinion and the broader world of political psychology from her courses, each of which introduced me to the fascinating questions behind my cur- rent agenda. I am also indebted to her for always reminding me to think rigorously about research design. Her keen eye for valid experimental instruments has shaped the way that I approach each of my projects, and they have improved immeasurably as a result. iv I thank William Minozzi for his detailed feedback on my research and for pushing me to become a better writer and scholar. Perhaps more importantly, I thank him for bringing a unique perspective to my work, on that leads me to think differently about my theories and evidence each time I step into his office. I thank him, too, for his cumulative advice about various aspects of professional academic life — from setting medium- and long-term goals, to creating realistic timelines and remembering to read e Cra of Research. I thank my graduate student colleagues, who enriched my time at OSU intellectually and otherwise. Sebastien Mainville provided me with reliable and helpful comments on my work, stimulating academic discussions, and friendship throughout our years as members of the IR cohort. Regular coffee trips with Carolyn Morgan immensely improved my nal semester, and her comments on this dissertation have proven invaluable. Erin Graham, Eleonora Mattiacci, and Emily Lynch merit recognition as not only my brilliant and helpful colleagues but my favorite running buddies. I am also thankful to Matt Hitt, Marina Duque, Raphael Cunha, Nyron Crawford, Vittorio Merola, and Jessy Defenderfer, each of whom le a positive mark on my graduate school experience through their feedback, friendship, or both. I especially thank my mentor, colleague, and friend, Josh Kertzer. Working with Josh taught me more about professionalization, navigating the discipline, the importance of presentation, and framing good research questions than I can reasonably expand upon lest I write another book. e length of my appendices alone is a testament to his inuence. Josh’s condence in my ability to make a contribution to the eld was a major force behind my drive to complete this degree, and I cannot thank him enough. I thank Larry Baum, Bear Braumoeller, Jennifer Mitzen, Mike Neblo, Tom Nelson, Randy Schweller, Alex ompson, and Alex Wendt, all members of the OSU faculty who have pro- vided me with comments or advice at various times on this project and throughout graduate v school. Each has made me a better teacher and/or scholar through feedback on my research, stimulating seminar discussions, and passing conversations. I also thank my colleagues out- side of the department who provided valuable feedback on portions of this project including Jonathan Renshon, Brian Rathbun, Aaron Rapport, and Debbie Larson. I acknowledge the support of the Mershon Center for International Security Studies and the Decision Sciences Collaborative at Ohio State. Each provided me with the nancial support required to fund my experimental work and for that I am most grateful. I thank my parents for fueling my passion to learn, and Judi Powers for inspiring a love of reading that has carried me through life. Even though they are not quite sure what it is I do every day – and the fault for that surely lies with me – I thank my entire family for believing in me during the most demanding parts of writing this dissertation. ank you to all of my nieces and nephews for making everything better and brighter every day. I thank several people whose friendship has enriched my life and made the challenges within and outside of academia far less daunting. Discussions with Kallie LaPier and Jor- dan LaPier helped me to connect theory to practice, and their friendship is a constant in a world full of variables. Ann Palcisco, Sara Florkey, Randa Johnson, Lydia Bolander, and Jess Reback supported me on and off the rugby pitch and make Columbus a wonderful place. Melissa Kleis and Angela Carlberg provided culinary comfort, while Diego Zaccai and Ed- die Worbis furnished technical support in addition to their friendship. Finally, I thank Dave Lieberman, whose implacable optimism has lled in for my own condence more than once. He also deserves credit for a portion of this project aer suggesting that Kennedy might have agreed with the implications of my theory. He has experienced my frustrations and celebrated my successes throughout graduate school, and while an adequate expression of appreciation eludes me, I make an effort by including this sincere, if brief, “thanks.” vi Vita . B.S. Political Science, Arizona State University . B.S. Psychology, Arizona State University . M.A. e Ohio State University -present . Graduate Student, e Ohio State University Publications Joshua D. Kertzer, Brian C. Rathbun, Kathleen E. Powers, and Ravi Iyer. “Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Preferences.” e Journal of Politics, (), -. Fields of Study Major Field: Political Science vii 5BCMFPG$POUFOUT 1BHF "CTUSBDU JJ "DLOPXMFEHFNFOUT JW 7JU B WJJJ -JTU PG 5BCMFT YJJJ -JTU PG 'JHVSFT YW $IBQUFS Ɖ *OUSPEVDUJPO #VJMEJOH $PMMFDUJWF *EFOUJUJFT JO *OUFSOBUJPOBM 1PMJUJDT Ɖ ƉƉ 0VU PG .BOZ 0OF "EESFTTJOH $POĘJDU CZ #VJMEJOH $PNNPO *EFOUJUJFT ƌ ƉƊ #FZPOE $PNNVOJUZ Ɖƍ ƉƋ 0VUMJOF PG UIF %JTTFSUBUJPO Ɗƈ $IBQUFS Ɗ ćF -JNJUT PG *EFOUJUZ 3FDPOTUSVDUJPO 4PDJBM 3FMBUJPOT BOE UIF $POTUJUV UJPO PG 4PDJBM *EFOUJUZ ƊƊ ƊƉ 0WFSWJFX ćF $IBMMFOHF PG #BMBODJOH 6OJUZ BOE %JWJTJPO ƊƋ ƊƊ 4PDJBM *EFOUJUZ BOE *OUFSHSPVQ $POĘJDU