Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013, 67

NOTE Psychrobacter sp. isolated from the kidney of salmonids at a number of aquaculture sites in Scotland

Ú. McCarthy*, H. Stagg, K. Donald, A. Garden and S. J. Weir

Š›’—ŽȱŒ˜•Š—ȱŒ’Ž—ŒŽǰȱŠ›’—ŽȱŠ‹˜›Š˜›¢ǰȱ‹Ž›ŽŽ—ǰȱŗŗȱşȱǰȱŒ˜•Š—

Abstract In October 2011, a Psychrobacter sp. was isolated as the predominant bacterial type from the kidney ˜ȱ–˜›’‹ž—ȱ꜑ǰȱœŠ–™•ŽȱŠȱ˜—Žȱ•Š—’ŒȱœŠ•–˜—ȱǻSalmo salar) site and one rainbow trout (Onco- rhynchus mykiss Walbaum) site, at two geographically and commercially separate seawater loca- tions in Scotland. The organism was subsequently isolated from kidney, and skin lesions or gills of moribund salmon at three further farm sites. While psychrobacter species have frequently been ’Ž—’ꮍȱŠ–˜—ȱ꜑ȱ’••ȱ˜›ȱ’—Žœ’—Š•ȱ̘›Šǰȱ‘Žȱ›ŽŒ˜ŸŽ›¢ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ‹ŠŒŽ›’ž–ȱŠœȱ‘Žȱ™›Ž˜–’—Š—ȱ’œ˜•ŠŽȱ from the kidney of compromised individuals suggests it has the capacity to establish opportunistic infections in salmonids.

growth was examined at regular intervals during In the late summer/autumn of 2011, marine colony development to determine the predomi- salmon farms in Scotland experienced high nant colony types based on colony morphology levels of mortality caused by amoebic gill (colour, size, shape, consistency, margins) and disease (AGD). As part of routine surveillance bacterial cell morphology (eg. straight or curved ˜ȱŽŽŒȱŠ—ȱ–˜—’˜›ȱ—˜’ꊋ•ŽȱŠ—ȱŽ–Ž›’—ȱ ›˜ǰȱŒ˜ŒŒžœǰȱꕊ–Ž—˜žœȱ›˜ǼǯȱŽ™›ŽœŽ—Š’ŸŽœȱ ’œŽŠœŽœǰȱŠ›’—ŽȱŒ˜•Š—ȱŒ’Ž—ŒŽȱǻǼȱœŠěȱ of predominant colonies were subcultured to Œ˜••ŽŒŽȱœŠ–™•Žœȱ›˜–ȱ–˜›’‹ž—ȱ꜑ȱ˜—ȱŠ- ˜‹Š’—ȱ™ž›ŽȱŒž•ž›Žœȱ˜›ȱ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱŽœœǯȱŠŒ- fected farms for testing to rule out the involve- terial isolates were then subjected to frontline ment of other factors in the mortalities. ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱŽœœȱ’ǯŽǯȱ™›ŽŽ›Ž—ŒŽȱ˜›ȱ›˜ ‘ȱŠȱ 15°C or 22°C, for media containing 1.5 % or 2 On site, samples of kidney material were taken % NaCl, Gram appearance, motility, presence with sterile disposable loops and inoculated asep- of cytochrome oxidase and catalase enzymes, tically onto tryptone soya agar (TSA), TSA plus oxidative or fermentative metabolism on modi- 1.5% NaCl (TSAS) and Flexibacter Maritimus ꎍȱ˜Ž••Ȃœȱ–Ž’ž–ȱǻŽ–˜œȱŽȱŠ•ǯǰȱŗşŞśǼȱŠ—ȱ Medium (FMM) for bacterial recovery. On receipt sensitivity to vibriostat O/129. Based on results at the Marine Laboratory, agar plates were incu- ˜ȱ‘ŽœŽȱŽœœǰȱž›‘Ž›ȱ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱ ŠœȱŒŠ››’Žȱ bated at 15°C for 10 days. The resultant bacterial out using a selection of standard biochemical

* Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] 68, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013 tests, including including miniaturised tests from ™ž›’ꮍȱžœ’—ȱ‘Žȱ Ž—ȱ’—•žŽȱ Ž•ȱ¡›ŠŒ- bioMérieux (API 20E, API 20NE or API ZYM, ’˜—ȱ ’ȱǻ Ž—ǰȱŘŞŜŖŜǼǯȱŽšžŽ—Œ’—ȱ›ŽŠŒ’˜—œȱ bioMérieux UK), supplementing media to 2 % were performed using the GenomeLab DTCS ꗊ•ȱœŠ•ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—ȱ ‘Ž›Žȱ Š››Š—ŽǯȱœŽ›ŠœŽȱ ž’Œ”ȱŠ›ȱ ’ȱǻŽŒ”–Š—ȱ˜ž•Ž›ǼȱŠ—ȱȱ activity of isolates was tested on TSAS contain- 8800 Sequencher (Beckman Coulter), according ing 1 % Tween 80 and haemolysin production to the manufacturer’s instructions, using the was tested on sheep blood agar (blood agar base œŠ–Žȱ™›’–Ž›œȱŠœȱžœŽȱ’—ȱȱŠ–™•’ęŒŠ’˜—ǯȱ‘Žȱ ǻ¡˜’ȱŖŞŚśǼǰȱ ’‘ȱśȱƖȱŽę‹›’—ŠŽȱœ‘ŽŽ™Ȃœȱ sequences were manually checked and edited ‹•˜˜ȱŠ—ȱŘȱƖȱꗊ•ȱœŠ•ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—Ǽǯȱ‘Ž›Žȱ using BioEdit software (Hall, 1999). The con- an isolate was of particular interest based on sensus sequence was matched with sequences ™›Ž˜–’—Š—ŒŽȱ˜›ȱ™›Žœž–™’ŸŽȱ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱ›˜–ȱ available in NCBI using BLAST (Altschul et al., the foregoing tests, genomic DNA was extracted, 1997). For phylogenetic comparisons, 1361 bases to allow sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, using from 16S rRNA gene sequences of a range of ‘ŽȱŽŠœ¢ȱ•˜˜ȱŠ—ȱ’œœžŽȱ ’ȱǻ Ž—ǰȱŜşśŖŜǼȱ Psychrobacter species were aligned using Clustal and following the manufacturer’s instructions for W2 (Larkin et al., 2007). Distance matrices were Gram-positive . generated by DNADIST using the assumptions of Kimura (1980) and dendrograms constructed Sections of DNA within the 16S rRNA gene using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Ž›ŽȱŠ–™•’ꮍȱ‹¢ȱȱžœ’—ȱŠȱœŽ•ŽŒ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ Ž’ǰȱŗşŞŝǼȱžœ’—ȱ  ȱŸŽ›œ’˜—ȱřǯŜşȱǻ‘Ĵ™DZȦȦ primer pairs to achieve sequence coverage of evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip/getme. the gene between positions 24 and 1540 (Yumoto html accessed 15/10/2012). Bootstrap values et al., 1999, see Table 1 for the list of primers). were obtained from 1000 trees generated with The production of a single band of the expected ȱŠ—ȱǯȱ›ŽŽ’Ž ȱŸŽ›œ’˜—ȱ œ’£Žȱ‹¢ȱŽŠŒ‘ȱ™›’–Ž›ȱ™Š’›ȱ ŠœȱŒ˜—ę›–Žȱ‹¢ȱ 1.6.6 (Page 1996) was used to visualise trees. electrophoresis on a 1.5 % agarose gel. The Š–™•’ꮍȱ‹Š—œȱ Ž›ŽȱŽ¡Œ’œŽȱ›˜–ȱ‘ŽȱŽ•ȱŠ—ȱ In October 2011, a previously unknown cocco-

Table 1. Positions and sequences of primers used in this study; F – forward, R – reverse.

Primer name Sequence (5’ – 3’)

24Fa GCA GGC YTA ACA CAT GCA AGT CGA

357F CTC CTA CGG GAG GCA GCA

806R GGA CTA CCA GGG TAT CTA AT

1080R GAG CTG ACG ACA RCC ATG CA

1240R TAC CGD CCA TTG TAG CAC GTG TGT A 1540R AAG GAG GTG ATC CAG CCG CA a based on numbering of E. coli 16S rRNA gene Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013, 69 bacillus was the most prevalent isolate, cultured 1496 (numbering corresponds to the Escherichia on TSAS from the kidney of 4 out of 5 sampled coli 16S rRNA gene). The results of phylogenetic ꜑ȱ˜—ȱ ˜ȱŽ˜›Š™‘’ŒŠ••¢ȱŠ—ȱŒ˜––Ž›Œ’Š••¢ȱ analysis are shown in Figure 1. Sequences used separate sea sites, one Atlantic salmon (Salmo in the analysis included a range of isolates from salar) and one rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus marine organisms as well as two sequences mykiss Walbaum). Subsequently, the organism with similarities to isolates obtained by Steinum was isolated on TSAS from skin lesions of 3 et al. (2009) in their study of Atlantic salmon œŠ•–˜—ȱŠ—ȱ‘Žȱ”’—Ž¢ȱ˜ȱŗȱ˜ȱ‘ŽœŽȱ꜑ȱ’—ȱŠȱśȱ gill-associated bacteria, namely Accession Nos. ꜑ȱœŠ–™•Žȱ’—ȱŽ‹›žŠ›¢ȱŘŖŗŘDzȱ›˜–ȱ‘Žȱ’••œȱ˜ȱ ŚřřřřŘȱŠ—ȱŜŝŝŞŜŞǯȱ a single salmon sampled in March; from the kidney of 1 of 2 salmon sampled in July. In all The Psychrobacter incorporates a group of 5 cases, the isolates exhibited the same pheno- aerobic, non-motile, oxidase and catalase posi- typical and biochemical characteristics . In cases tive, non-pigmented, mainly psychrotrophic 1, 2, 4 and 5 the isolate was sequenced and the Gram-negative rods or coccobacilli (Juni and 16S rRNA sequence was identical. Heym, 1986). Members of the genus have been isolated from a variety of low-temperature envi- The organism forms creamy-white, opaque, ronments including polar seas, sea ice and soils low convex 1 mm diameter colonies at 48 h on Š—ȱŠœȱœ™˜’•ŠŽȱ˜›Š—’œ–œȱ˜ȱ–ŽŠȱŠ—ȱ꜑ȱ’—ȱ TSAS and prefers growth at 22°C to 15°C. It cold storage (Bowman et al., 1996; González et is a Gram-negative, non-motile coccobacillus al., 2000; Bozal et al., 2003; Romanenko et al., occurring in pairs, oxidase and catalase posi- 2004). Psychrobacters have also been isolated tive and resistant to vibriostat O/129. In oxida- from the faeces of seals (Yassin and Busse, 2009) tion-fermentation tests the organism is inert and of pigeons (Kämpfer et al., 2002), and a and it is negative in sulphide-indole-motility strain designated as P. pulmonis was isolated (SIM) and gas from glucose (GfG) tests (both from the lungs of infected lambs (Vela et al., of these media supplemented with NaCl to a 2003). Human isolates, other than P. phenylpyru- ꗊ•ȱŒ˜—ŒŽ—›Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱŘƖǼǯȱ‘Žȱ ȱŘŖȱ™›˜ę•Žȱ vicus, mostly belong to the species ǯȱŠŽŒŠ•’œ and is 0201004, i.e. positive for citrate utilisation, P. pulmonis (Deschaght et al., 2012). Voges-Proskauer reaction and oxidase. The  ȱŘŖȱ™›˜ę•Žȱ’œȱŖŖŖŖŖŖŚǰȱ’Žǯȱ—ŽŠ’ŸŽȱ˜›ȱ Psychrobacters are found as a normal compo- all tests except for oxidase. In API ZYM, the —Ž—ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ–’Œ›˜Ě˜›Šȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱœ”’—ȱŠ—ȱ’••œȱǻ ž—’ȱ isolate is positive for alkaline phosphatase, C4 and Heym, 1986; Scholes and Shewan 1964; esterase, C8 esterase-lipase, leucine and valine ‘Ĵ™DZȦȦ‹ŠŒ–Š™ǯ ’œ‘Š›•Š‹ǯŒ˜–Ȧ˜›Š—’œ–œȦśŘŜȱ peptidases and phosphoamidase. Tween 80 is accessed 8/09/2012). They have been reported hydrolysed but the organism is non-haemolytic from the gut of Atlantic salmon, Arctic charr on sheep blood agar. Blast analysis of the partial (Salvelinus alpinus L.), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua ŗŜȱ›ȱœŽšžŽ—ŒŽȱǻ‹ŠœŽœȱśŖȬŗśŖŖǼȱ’Ž—’ꮍȱ L.) (Kristiansen et al., 2011; Ringø et al., 2006a; the organism as Psychrobacter sp. with 100 % Ringø et al., 2006b) and from fast growing ju- similarity to Psychrobacter sp. 146Z4-2 (GenBank venile grouper (Epinephilus coioides) (Sun, 2009). řŗŖŘŜŚǼǰȱ‹ŠœŽȱ˜—ȱŒ˜–™Š›’œ˜—ȱ˜ȱ‹ŠœŽœȱśŖȱȮȱ Ž››’ꎕȱŽȱŠ•ǯȱǻŘŖŖşǼȱ’œ˜•ŠŽȱ™œ¢Œ‘›˜‹ŠŒŽ›ȱ 70, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013

EU433332 EU433332 Psychrobacter sp. (Arctic marine sediments) AF468405 AF468405 Arctic sea ice bacterium

HE800832 HE800832 P. okhotskensis (Arctic Ocean)

PSYSAL Psychrobacter salmon isolate Scotland

JX310264 JX310264 Psychrobacter sp. (Southern Ocean)

GU574735 GU574735 Psychrobacter sp. (Bering Sea)

FJ785515 FJ785515 Psychrobacter sp. (Pacific Ocean) 675 HM584277 HM584277 P. glacincola (red tanner crab) 989 NR024806 NR_024806 P. okhotskensis (north-eastern Pacific Ocean) 902 JQ691541 JQ691541 Psychrobacter sp. (fish gut microbiome)

DQ677868 DQ677868 Psychrobacter sp. (glacier, Antarctica)

938 JQ691535 JQ691535 Psychrobacter sp. (fish gut microbiome)

EU000245 511 EU000245 P. maritimus (Arctic marine bacterium) 701 977 AB302185 AB302185 (diseased Antarctic krill)

AB302184 AB302184 (diseased Antarctic krill)

NR042221 NR_042221 P. urativorans type strain DSM 14009

662 HM212666 HM212666 P. sanguinis (human) 1000 HM212668 HM212668 P. sanguinis (human) 940 FJ463826 FJ463826 Psychrobacter sp. (chicken) 919 PRwf 1 NC_009524 Psychrobacter sp. PRwf-1 (silk snapper skin and gills) 1000 GQ370385 GQ370385 Psychrobacter sp. (herring gut) 559 NR041688 NR_041688 P. fulvigenes (marine crustacean)

HQ698584 HQ698584 P. pulmonis (human)

HQ698570 HQ698570 P. faecalis (human)

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of the Psychrobacter sp. isolated in this study with species from marine Ž—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—œȱŠ—ȱ’—ŸŽ›Ž‹›ŠŽœǰȱ›˜–ȱ’—Žœ’—ŽȱŠ—ȱ’••œȱ˜ȱ꜑ȱŠ—ȱ›˜–ȱ‘’‘Ž›ȱŸŽ›Ž‹›ŠŽœǯȱŽ’‘‹˜ž›Ȭ joining tree based on the alignment of 1361 nucleotides of the 16S rRNA gene, using the assumptions of Kimura. Numbers at nodes are the bootstrap values from 1000 replications (only values greater than 500 are œ‘˜ —Ǽǯȱ™ŽŒ’ŽœȱŠ›Žȱ’Ž—’ꮍȱ‹¢ȱ‘Ž’›ȱ Ž—Š—”ȱŠŒŒŽœœ’˜—ȱ—ž–‹Ž›ǰȱœ™ŽŒ’ŽœȱŠ—ȱœ˜ž›ŒŽǯ

species from the intestine of rainbow trout fed a ming motility, oxidase and catalase positive, diet rich in soybean meal, but not from trout fed fermentative, sensitive to O/129 and exhibiting ꜑–ŽŠ•ǯȱ —ȱŠȱœž›ŸŽ¢ȱ˜ȱ‹ŠŒŽ›’ŠȱŠœœ˜Œ’ŠŽȱ ’‘ȱ Œ‘Š›ŠŒŽ›’œ’Œȱ™›˜ę•Žœȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱ ȱŘŖȱŽœǯȱ˜‘ȱ proliferative gill disease of salmon in Norway Moritella viscosa and Allivibrio spp. have been (Steinum et al., 2009), psychrobacter was one of ’Ž—’ꮍȱŠœȱ™Š›ȱ˜ȱ‘’œȱ–’¡ŽȱŒž•ž›Žǯȱ‘žœǰȱ the predominant species isolated from the gills the coincidental initial isolation of Psychrobacter ˜ȱ‹˜‘ȱŠěŽŒŽȱŠ—ȱ—˜—ȬŠěŽŒŽȱ꜑ǯȱ as the predominant species in 4 of 5 sampled ꜑ȱ›˜–ȱ ’Ž•¢ȱœŽ™Š›ŠŽȱ•˜ŒŠ’˜—œȱœžŽœŽȱ With this widespread and common association ‘Šȱ’ȱ–Š¢ȱ‘ŠŸŽȱ–˜›Žȱœ’—’ęŒŠ—ŒŽȱ‘Š—ȱŠœȱŠȱ ˜ȱ‘Žȱ‹ŠŒŽ›’ž–ȱ ’‘ȱ꜑ǰȱ’ȱ’œȱ—˜ȱœž›™›’œ’—ȱ˜ȱ chance occurrence. Furthermore, isolation of ꗍȱ’ȱ’—ȱŒ˜Ĵ’œ‘ȱœŠ•–˜—’œǯȱ ˜ ŽŸŽ›ǰȱ’—ȱ˜ž›ȱ the bacterium from kidney implies that it can hands, bacteria typically recovered from the access and establish a presence in the internal kidney of salmonids in seawater are mixed iso- ˜›Š—œȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ꜑ǯȱ lates of the Vibrionaceae family ie. Gram-nega- tive rods preferring growth on media containing Psychrobacter is classed as a member of the Mo- 2% NaCl and growth at 22°C, exhibiting swim- raxellaceae family, of which a number of species Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013, 71

46, 841-848. are considered to be pathogens of animals or have been associated with nosocomial infections Bozal N, Montes MJ, Tudela E and Guinea J (2003). Characterization of several of both humans and animals (Vela et al., 2003). psychrobacter strains isolated from Moraxella sp. have recently been associated with Antarctic environments and description of poor growth performance in Mediterranean- Psychrobacter luti sp. nov. and Psychrobacter farmed sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) (Addis et al., ˜£’’ sp. nov. —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’Œȱ Š—ȱŸ˜•ž’˜—Š›¢ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 53, 1093-1100. 2010). An intramuscular challenge of rainbow trout with P. immobilis, isolated from naturally- ŽœŒ‘Š‘ȱǰȱ Š—œœŽ—œȱǰȱŠ—ŽŽŒ‘˜žĴŽȱȱŠ—ȱ Wauters G (2012). Psychrobacter isolates infected trout, failed to cause mortality, but did of human origin, other than Psychrobacter Ž•’Œ’ȱ’—ĚŠ––Š˜›¢ȱ›Žœ™˜—œŽœǰȱŸŠœŒž•Š›ȱ’•Š’˜—ȱ phenylpyruvicus, are predominantly and congestion (Hisar et al., 2002). The authors Psychrobacter ŠŽŒŠ•’œ and Psychrobacter of this study suggested that P. immobilis may pulmonis, with emended description of P. ŠŽŒŠ•’œ. —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’Œȱ be an opportunistic pathogen of trout. Neop- Š—ȱŸ˜•ž’˜—Š›¢ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 62, 671-674. aramoeba perurans, the causative agent of AGD, González CJ, Santos JA, García-López M-L and has been shown to cause immunosuppression in Otero A (2000). Psychrobacters and related Atlantic salmon (Wynne et al., 2008; Young et al., ‹ŠŒŽ›’Šȱ’—ȱ›Žœ‘ ŠŽ›ȱ꜑ǯȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ˜˜ȱ 2008) and it could be that this has rendered the Protection 63, 315-321. ꜑ȱ’—ȱ‘ŽȱŒ˜Ĵ’œ‘ȱ ȱ˜ž‹›ŽŠ”œȱœžœŒŽ™’‹•Žȱ Hall T (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological to invasion by Psychrobacter. On the other hand, sequence alignment editor and analysis an underlying infection by an opportunistic program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95-98. ‹ŠŒŽ›’ž–ȱŒ˜ž•ȱŠ•œ˜ȱŽ¡ŠŒŽ›‹ŠŽȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒœȱ˜ȱ amoebic infestation and it may be helpful in Hisar O, Yanik T and Hisar SA (2002). Clinical and pathological investigation of ŠŒ”•’—ȱ‘’œȱ•ŠĴŽ›ȱŒ˜—’’˜—ȱ˜ȱŠœŒŽ›Š’—ȱ’ȱ‘Žȱ infection In rainbow ‹ŠŒŽ›’ž–ȱ’œȱŒ˜—›’‹ž’—ȱ™Š‘˜•˜’ŒŠ•ȱŽěŽŒœǯ trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) œ›ŠŽ•’ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱšžŠŒž•ž›Ž - BAMIGDEH References 54, 189-196. Addis MF, Cappuccinelli R, Tedde V, Pagnozzi ž—’ȱȱŠ—ȱ Ž¢–ȱ ȱǻŗşŞŜǼǯȱŽę—Žȱ–Ž’ž–ȱ D, Viale I, Meloni M, Salati F, Roggio T and for Moraxella bovis. Applied and Environmental ££ŠžȱȱǻŘŖŗŖǼǯȱ —ĚžŽ—ŒŽȱ˜ȱMoraxella sp. ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 52, 966-968. colonization on the kidney proteome of farmed gilthead sea breams (Sparus aurata, Kämpfer P, Albrecht A, Buczolits S and Busse L.). Proteome Science Oct 12, 8:50:8. H-J (2002). œ¢Œ‘›˜‹ŠŒŽ›ȱŠŽŒŠ•’œ sp. nov., a new species from a bioaerosol originating •œŒ‘ž•ȱǰȱŠŽ—ȱǰȱŒ‘§ěŽ›ȱǰȱ‘Š—ȱ ǰȱ from pigeon faeces. Systematic and Applied Zhang Z, Miller W and Lipman DJ (1997). ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 25, 31-36. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search Kimura M (1980). A simple method for programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 3389- estimating evolutionary rates of base 3402. substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ˜•ŽŒž•Š›ȱ Bowman JP, Cavanagh J, Austin JJ and Evolution 16, 111-120. Sanderson K (1996). Novel psychrobacter species from Antarctic ornithogenic soils. ›’œ’Š—œŽ—ȱ ǰȱ Ž››’ꎕȱ ǰȱ ŽŒ’—˜ȱ  ǰȱ —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’ŒȱŠŒŽ›’˜•˜¢ Myklebust R and Ringø E (2011). Evaluation 72, Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 33(2) 2013

˜ȱ™›Ž‹’˜’ŒȱŠ—ȱ™›˜‹’˜’ŒȱŽěŽŒœȱ˜—ȱ‘Žȱ method: a new method for reconstructing intestinal gut microbiota and histology of phylogenetic trees. ˜•ŽŒž•Š›ȱ’˜•˜¢ȱŠ—ȱ Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ Evolution 4, 406-425. Aquaculture Research and Development S1, 009. Scholes RB and Shewan JM (1964). The Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, present status of some aspects of marine ‘Ž——ŠȱǰȱŒ ŽĴ’Š—ȱǰȱŒ’••’Š–ȱ ǰȱ microbiology ŸŠ—ŒŽœȱ’—ȱŠ›’—Žȱ’˜•˜¢ Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, 2, 133-169. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ and Higgins DG Steinum T, Sjåstad K, Falk K, Kvellestad A ǻŘŖŖŝǼǯȱ•žœŠ•ȱȱŠ—ȱ•žœŠ•ȱȱŸŽ›œ’˜—ȱŘǯŖǯȱ and Colquhoun DJ (2009). An RT PCR- ’˜’—˜›–Š’Œœ 23, 2947-2948. DGGE survey of gill-associated bacteria in Lemos ML, Toranzo AE and Barja JL (1985). Norwegian seawater-reared Atlantic salmon Modified medium for the oxidation- œžěŽ›’—ȱ™›˜•’Ž›Š’ŸŽȱ’••ȱ’—ĚŠ––Š’˜—ǯȱ Ž›–Ž—Š’˜—ȱŽœȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱ’Ž—’ęŒŠ’˜—ȱ˜ȱ Aquaculture 293, 172-179. marine bacteria. Applied and Environmental Sun YZ, Ling ZC, Chang JB and Ye JD (2009). ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 49, 1541-1543. Gut microbiota of fast and slow growing Ž››’ꎕȱǰȱ’–’›˜•˜žȱǰȱ›Š•Ž¢ȱ ǰȱŠ”Ž›ȱ grouper Epinephelus coioides. ›’ŒŠ—ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ RTM and Davies SJ (2009). Soybean meal ˜ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ Research 3, 713-720. alters autochthonous microbial populations, Vela AI, Collins MD, Latre MV, Mateos A, microvilli morphology and compromises Moreno MA, Hutson R, Domínguez L intestinal enterocyte integrity of rainbow and Fernández-Garayzábal JF (2003). trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). sp. nov., isolated ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ’œ‘ȱ’œŽŠœŽœ 32, 755-766. from the lungs of lambs. —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ Page RDM (1996). Tree View: An application ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’ŒȱŠ—ȱŸ˜•ž’˜—Š›¢ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ to display phylogenetic trees on personal 53, 415-419. computers. Computer applications in the Wynne J, O’Sullivan M, Cook M, Stone G, Nowak biosciences : CABIOS 12, 357-358. ǰȱ˜ŸŽ••ȱȱŠ—ȱ••’˜ĴȱȱǻŘŖŖŞǼǯȱ›Š—œŒ›’™˜–Žȱ Ringø E, Sperstad S, Myklebust R, Mayhew TM Š—Š•¢œŽœȱ˜ȱŠ–˜Ž‹’Œȱ’••ȱ’œŽŠœŽȬŠěŽŒŽȱ Š—ȱ•œŽ—ȱȱǻŘŖŖŜŠǼǯȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒȱ˜ȱ’ŽŠ›¢ȱ Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) tissues reveal inulin on aerobic bacteria associated with localized host gene suppression. Marine hindgut of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus ’˜ŽŒ‘—˜•˜¢ 10, 388-403. L.). Aquaculture Research 37, 891-897. Yassin AF and Busse H-J (2009). Psychrobacter Ringø E, Sperstad S, Myklebust R, Refstie S lutiphocae sp. nov., isolated from the faeces and Krogdahl Å (2006b). Characterisation of a seal. —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’Œȱ of the microbiota associated with intestine Š—ȱŸ˜•ž’˜—Š›¢ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 59, 2049-2053. of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhuaȱǯǼDZȱ‘ŽȱŽěŽŒȱ Young ND, Cooper GA, Nowak BF, Koop BF ˜ȱ꜑ȱ–ŽŠ•ǰȱœŠ—Š›ȱœ˜¢‹ŽŠ—ȱ–ŽŠ•ȱŠ—ȱŠȱ and Morrison RN (2008). Coordinated bioprocessed soybean meal. Aquaculture down-regulation of the antigen processing 261, 829-841. machinery in the gills of amoebic gill disease- Romanenko LA, Lysenko AM, Rohde M, ŠěŽŒŽȱ•Š—’ŒȱœŠ•–˜—ȱǻŠ•–˜ȱœŠ•Š›ȱǯǼǯȱ Mikhailov VV and Stackebrandt E (2004). ˜•ŽŒž•Š›ȱ ––ž—˜•˜¢ 45, 2581-2597. Psychrobacter maritimus sp. nov. and Yumoto I, Iwata H, Sawabe T, Ueno K, Ichise N, Psychrobacter arenosus sp. nov., isolated from Matsuyama H, Okuyama H and Kawasaki coastal sea ice and sediments of the Sea K (1999). Characterization of a facultatively of Japan. —Ž›—Š’˜—Š•ȱ ˜ž›—Š•ȱ˜ȱ¢œŽ–Š’Œȱ psychrophilic bacterium, Vibrio rumoiensis Š—ȱŸ˜•ž’˜—Š›¢ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 54, 1741-1745. sp. nov., that exhibits high catalase activity. Saitou N and Nei M (1987). The neighbor-joining ™™•’ŽȱŠ—ȱ—Ÿ’›˜—–Ž—Š•ȱ’Œ›˜‹’˜•˜¢ 65, 67-72.