DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ISSUANCE OF AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT TO CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR TAKE OF FLORIDA SCRUB-JAYS AND EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES INCIDENTAL TO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATED UNDER CHARLOTTE COUNTY’S PERMITTING AUTHORITY PREPARED BY: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES DIVISION ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMITS BRANCH 1875 CENTURY BOULDEVARD, #200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30345 FEBRUARY 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION....................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Proposed Action...........................................................................................1 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action..……....................................................................................2 1.4 Decision That Must be Made…….......................................................................................3 1.5 Issues and Concerns…….....................................................................................................4 1.6 Coordination and Consultation……....................................................................................5 2.0 ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION..……….................................6 2.1 Alternative 1: The No Action Alternative…..…................................................................7 2.2 Alternative 2: Issuance of the Incidental Take Permit (The Preferred Alternative)...........8 2.2.1 Minimization Measures………...............................................................................8 2.2.2 Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................9 2.2.3 Other Conservation Measures……………………………………………………...10 3.0 THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT......................................................................................11 3.1 Physical Environment........................................................................................................12 3.2 Land Use............................................................................................................................12 3.3 Biological Environment.....................................................................................................12 3.3.1 General Description of Plant and Animal Communities..........................................13 3.3.1.1 Xeric Oak Scrub……………………………………………………………...13 3.3.1.2 Sand Pine Scrub……………………………………………………………...13 3.3.1.3 Scrubby Pine Flatwoods……………………………………………………..14 3.3.2 Protected Species......................................................................................................14 3.3.2.1 Florida Scrub-jay…………………………….................................................14 3.3.2.1.1 Biological Information......................................................................14 3.3.2.1.2 Site-specific Information for Charlotte County................................22 3.3.2.2 Eastern Indigo Snake…………………………………………………….......22 3.3.2.2.1 Biological Information......................................................................22 3.3.2.2.2 Site-specific Information for Charlotte County................................24 3.3.2.3 Florida Bonneted Bat…………………….......................................................25 3.3.2.3.1 Biological Information......................................................................25 3.3.2.3.2 Site-specific Information for Charlotte County................................27 3.3.2.4 Gopher Tortoise………………………………………………………...........28 3.3.2.4.1 Biological Information......................................................................28 3.3.2.4.2 Site-specific Information for Charlotte County................................35 3.3.3 Natural and Human Threats to Protected Species in Charlotte County....................35 3.3.3.1 Florida Scrub-jay…………………………………………………………….35 3.3.3.2 Eastern Indigo Snake………………………………………………………...41 3.3.3.3 Florida Bonneted Bat………………………………………………………...44 3.3.3.4 Gopher Tortoise……………………………………………………………...48 3.4 Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................50 3.5 Social Interests...................................................................................................................51 3.6 Economy............................................................................................................................51 3.7 Aesthetics..........................................................................................................................51 i 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES..............................................................................52 4.1 Alternative 1: The No Action Alternative.........................................................................52 4.1.1 Physical Environment...............................................................................................52 4.1.2 Land Use...................................................................................................................53 4.1.3 Biological Environment............................................................................................53 4.1.3.1 Covered Species....…………………………………………………………...53 4.1.3.1.1 Direct Effects…………………………………………………………..54 4.1.3.1.2 Indirect Effects…………………………………………………………54 4.1.3.1.3 Cumulative Effects……………………………………………………..55 4.1.3.2 Other Federally-listed Species……………………………………………….55 4.1.4 Cultural Resources....................................................................................................55 4.1.5 Social Issues..............................................................................................................55 4.1.6 Economic Concerns..................................................................................................56 4.1.7 Aesthetics..................................................................................................................56 4.2 Alternative 2: Issuance of the ITP (The Preferred Alternative).........................................57 4.2.1 Physical Environment...............................................................................................57 4.2.2 Land Use...................................................................................................................57 4.2.3 Biological Environment............................................................................................57 4.2.3.1 Protected Species……….................................................................................57 4.2.3.1.1 Direct Effects..........................................................................................58 4.2.3.1.2 Indirect Effects........................................................................................59 4.2.3.1.3 Cumulative Effects..................................................................................59 4.2.3.3 Other Species...................................................................................................60 4.2.4 Cultural Resources....................................................................................................60 4.2.5 Social Issues..............................................................................................................60 4.2.6 Economic Concerns..................................................................................................61 4.2.7 Aesthetics..................................................................................................................61 5.0 REFERENCES.........................................................................................................................62 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Comparison of With and Without a Charlotte County-wide HCP……..………….73 Table 2. Mitigation Fees, by Acreage Tier………………………………………………….74 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Scrub-jay observation buffers in Charlotte County……………………………….75 Figure 2. Prospective Reserve areas…………………………………………………...…….76 Figure 3. Metapopulations of scrub-jays in Charlotte County…..…………………………..77 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Charlotte County County-wide Florida Scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Habitat Conservation Plan Attachment B – SHPO Statement Regarding Cultural Resources in Charlotte County ii ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ISSUANCE OF AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMIT TO CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR TAKE OF FLORIDA SCRUB-JAYS AND EASTERN INDIGO SNAKES INCIDENTAL TO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATED UNDER CHARLOTTE COUNTY’S PERMITTING AUTHORITY 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION 1.1 Introduction The County of Charlotte, Florida (Applicant or County) is seeking an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. The ITP would authorize the take of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) (scrub-jay) and Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon courais couperi) (indigo snake) incidental to construction and development permitted and/or conducted by the Applicant (impact area), and habitat management activities conducted or authorized by the Applicant on conservation lands (Reserve) throughout Charlotte County. Together, the impact area and the Reserve area comprise the Action Area. The Applicant has submitted an HCP in support of the ITP application. Much of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What Can We Predict About the Spread of Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases?
    2010 Fleas, Hosts and Habitat: What can we predict about the spread of vector-borne zoonotic diseases? Ph.D. Dissertation Megan M. Friggens School of Forestry I I I \, l " FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? by Megan M. Friggens A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science Northern Arizona University May 2010 ?Jii@~-~-u-_- Robert R. Parmenter, Ph. D. ~",l(*~ l.~ Paulette L. Ford, Ph. D. --=z:r-J'l1jU~ David M. Wagner, Ph. D. ABSTRACT FLEAS, HOSTS AND HABITAT: WHAT CAN WE PREDICT ABOUT THE SPREAD OF VECTOR-BORNE ZOONOTIC DISEASES? MEGAN M. FRIGGENS Vector-borne diseases of humans and wildlife are experiencing resurgence across the globe. I examine the dynamics of flea borne diseases through a comparative analysis of flea literature and analyses of field data collected from three sites in New Mexico: The Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, the Sandia Mountains and the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP). My objectives were to use these analyses to better predict and manage for the spread of diseases such as plague (Yersinia pestis). To assess the impact of anthropogenic disturbance on flea communities, I compiled and analyzed data from 63 published empirical studies. Anthropogenic disturbance is associated with conditions conducive to increased transmission of flea-borne diseases. Most measures of flea infestation increased with increasing disturbance or peaked at intermediate levels of disturbance. Future trends of habitat and climate change will probably favor the spread of flea-borne disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 7.100
    Coast Guard, DHS § 7.100 the easternmost extremity of Black- (e) A line drawn across the seaward beard Island at Northeast Point. extremity of the Sebastian Inlet Jet- (d) A line drawn from the southern- ties. most extremity of Blackbeard Island to (f) A line drawn from the seaward ex- latitude 31°19.4′ N. longitude 81°11.5′ W. tremity of the Fort Pierce Inlet North (Doboy Sound Lighted Buoy ‘‘D’’); Jetty to latitude 27°28.5′ N. longitude thence to latitude 31°04.1′ N. longitude 80°16.2′ W. (Fort Pierce Inlet Lighted 81°16.7′ W. (St. Simons Lighted Whistle Whistle Buoy ‘‘2’’); thence to the tank Buoy ‘‘ST S’’). located in approximate position lati- tude 27°27.2′ N. longitude 80°17.2′ W. § 7.85 St. Simons Island, GA to Little (g) A line drawn from the seaward ex- Talbot Island, FL. tremity of St. Lucie Inlet north jetty (a) A line drawn from latitude 31°04.1′ to latitude 27°10′ N. longitude 80°08.4′ N. longitude 81°16.7′ W. (St. Simons W. (St. Lucie Inlet Entrance Lighted Lighted Whistle Buoy ‘‘ST S’’) to lati- Whistle Buoy ‘‘2’’); thence to Jupiter tude 30°42.7′ N. longitude 81°19.0′ W. (St. Island bearing approximately 180° true. Mary’s Entrance Lighted Whistle Buoy (h) A line drawn from the seaward ex- ‘‘1’’); thence to Amelia Island Light. tremity of Jupiter Inlet North Jetty to (b) A line drawn from the southern- the northeast extremity of the con- most extremity of Amelia Island to crete apron on the south side of Jupiter latitude 30°29.4′ N.
    [Show full text]
  • Report SFRC-83/01 Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity
    Report SFRC-83/01 Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity NATIONAL b lb -a'*? m ..-.. # .* , *- ,... - . ,--.-,, , . LG LG - m,*.,*,*, Or 7°C ,"7cn,a. Q*Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O.Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................... 1 STUDYAREA ............................ 1 METHODS .............................. 3 RESULTS .............................. 4 Figure 1. Distribution of the indigo snake in southern Florida ..... 5 Figure 2 . Distribution of the indigo snake in the Florida Keys including Biscayne National Park ............. 6 DISCUSSION ............................. 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................ 13 LITERATURE CITED ......................... 14 APPENDIX 1. Observations of indigo snakes in southern Florida ....... 17 APPENDIX 2 . Data on indigo snakes examined in and adjacent to Everglades National Park ................. 24 APPENDIX 3. Museum specimens of indigo snakes from southern Florida ... 25 4' . Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity Report ~F~~-83/01 Todd M. Steiner, Oron L. Bass, Jr., and James A. Kushlan National Park Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 January 1983 Steiner, Todd M., Oron L. Bass, Jr., and James A. Kushlan. 1983. Status of the Eastern Indigo Snake in Southern Florida National Parks and Vicinity. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC- 83/01. 25 pp. INTRODUCTION The status and biology of the eastern indigo snake, Drymarchon corais couperi, the largest North American snake (~awler,1977), is poorly understood. Destruction of habitat and exploitation by the pet trade have reduced its population levels in various localities to the point that it is listed by the Federal government as a threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Seroice Research Note S E- 177 July 1971
    USDA Forest Seroice Research Note S E- 177 July 1971 CHOPPING AND WEBBING CONTROL SAW-PALMETTO IN SOUTH FLORIDA1 Abstract.--Saw-palmetto is one of the more troublesome plants growing in south Florida, and its control is often desirable in programs of range and timber management. Both cross-chopping and webbing (root plowing) proved to be ef­ fective control measures, but webbing appeared to be less effective on a moist site. Many other shrubs were also effectively reduced by these treatments. Saw-palmetto (Serenoa repens (Bartr.) Small) is the major under­ story shrub over much of the pine flatwoods. It is the dominant shrub on some 8.5 million acres of grazed forest land and 9 million acres of com­ mercial, nongrazed forest land in Florida (4) and is commonly associated with other shrubs over most of the pine-;Iregrass type. These shrubs are important competitors with forage and trees for soil moisture, nutri­ ents, light, and space. In dense stands of shrubs, particularly palmetto, yield and availability of forage is decreased, and cattle handling is more difficult. Wildfire is especially damaging to trees where shrubs contrib­ ute a large amount of combustible material. Most shrubs also impede planting and harvesting of pines. For these reasons, most land managers seek practical methods of shrub control. Fire has been used in the South for many years to alleviate these problems (6). Although burning temporarily reduces the size of saw­ palmetto, the plants are not killed but readily begin sprouting. These re­ sponses to fire are also true of most other southern shrubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice with Attachments
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT P. O. BOX 4970 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32232-0019 FEBRUARY 27, 2019 PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Application Number SAJ-2018-03124(SP-MRE) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) as described below: APPLICANT: Grand Creek Partners LLC 161 Hampton Point Drive, Suite 1 St. Augustine, Florida 32092 WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States (wetlands) associated with Petty Branch, a tributary to the St. Johns River. The project site is contiguous to, and west of, the intersection of Old Palm Valley Road (County Road 210) and Longleaf Pine Parkway; and, is formed by several properties (St. Johns County Property Appraiser Parcel Identification Numbers 010080-0000, 010080-0020, 010090-0000, 010090-0032, and 010510- 0010), in Sections 32 and 40, Township 5 South, Range 27 East, and Section 43, Township 6 South, Range 27 East, St. Johns County, Florida. APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES: Latitude 30.016600° Longitude -81.613946° PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: The basic project purpose is residential development. Overall: The overall project purpose is the establishment of a residential subdivision serving the housing market in northwest St. Johns County. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Soils: The Soil Survey of the St. Johns County, Florida identifies eleven soil types at the project site. These soil types are Adamsville fine sand (map unit 01), Astatula fine sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes (map unit 02), Holopaw fine sand, frequently flooded (map unit 47), Myakka fine sand (map unit 03), Pomona fine sand (map unit 09), Pottsburg fine sand (map unit 40), Riviera fine sand, frequently flooded (map unit 36), Samsula muck (map unit 26), Sparr fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (map unit 44), Tavares fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (map unit 06), and Winder fine sand, frequently flooded (map unit 48).
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Southern Florida's Native Plant Heritage
    A publication of The Institute for Regional Conservation’s Restoring South Florida’s Native Plant Heritage program Copyright 2002 The Institute for Regional Conservation ISBN Number 0-9704997-0-5 Published by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue Miami, Florida 33170 www.regionalconservation.org [email protected] Printed by River City Publishing a division of Titan Business Services 6277 Powers Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32217 Cover photos by George D. Gann: Top: mahogany mistletoe (Phoradendron rubrum), a tropical species that grows only on Key Largo, and one of South Florida’s rarest species. Mahogany poachers and habitat loss in the 1970s brought this species to near extinction in South Florida. Bottom: fuzzywuzzy airplant (Tillandsia pruinosa), a tropical epiphyte that grows in several conservation areas in and around the Big Cypress Swamp. This and other rare epiphytes are threatened by poaching, hydrological change, and exotic pest plant invasions. Funding for Rare Plants of South Florida was provided by The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Major funding for the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, the research program upon which this manual is based, was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Nemastylis floridana Small Celestial Lily South Florida Status: Critically imperiled. One occurrence in five conservation areas (Dupuis Reserve, J.W. Corbett Wildlife Management Area, Loxahatchee Slough Natural Area, Royal Palm Beach Pines Natural Area, & Pal-Mar). Taxonomy: Monocotyledon; Iridaceae. Habit: Perennial terrestrial herb. Distribution: Endemic to Florida. Wunderlin (1998) reports it as occasional in Florida from Flagler County south to Broward County.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia).
    [Show full text]
  • Keys Sanctuary 25 Years of Marine Preservation National Parks Turn 100 Offbeat Keys Names Florida Keys Sunsets
    Keys TravelerThe Magazine Keys Sanctuary 25 Years of Marine Preservation National Parks Turn 100 Offbeat Keys Names Florida Keys Sunsets fla-keys.com Decompresssing at Bahia Honda State Park near Big Pine Key in the Lower Florida Keys. ANDY NEWMAN MARIA NEWMAN Keys Traveler 12 The Magazine Editor Andy Newman Managing Editor 8 4 Carol Shaughnessy ROB O’NEAL ROB Copy Editor Buck Banks Writers Julie Botteri We do! Briana Ciraulo Chloe Lykes TIM GROLLIMUND “Keys Traveler” is published by the Monroe County Tourist Development Contents Council, the official visitor marketing agency for the Florida Keys & Key West. 4 Sanctuary Protects Keys Marine Resources Director 8 Outdoor Art Enriches the Florida Keys Harold Wheeler 9 Epic Keys: Kiteboarding and Wakeboarding Director of Sales Stacey Mitchell 10 That Florida Keys Sunset! Florida Keys & Key West 12 Keys National Parks Join Centennial Celebration Visitor Information www.fla-keys.com 14 Florida Bay is a Must-Do Angling Experience www.fla-keys.co.uk 16 Race Over Water During Key Largo Bridge Run www.fla-keys.de www.fla-keys.it 17 What’s in a Name? In Marathon, Plenty! www.fla-keys.ie 18 Visit Indian and Lignumvitae Keys Splash or Relax at Keys Beaches www.fla-keys.fr New Arts District Enlivens Key West ach of the Florida Keys’ regions, from Key Largo Bahia Honda State Park, located in the Lower Keys www.fla-keys.nl www.fla-keys.be Stroll Back in Time at Crane Point to Key West, features sandy beaches for relaxing, between MMs 36 and 37. The beaches of Bahia Honda Toll-Free in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
    Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum Bitterweed Helenium amarum Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia Nolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Spanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) Scrub Palmetto Sabal etonia Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae (Milkweed) Caesalpinceae Butterfly Weed Asclepias
    [Show full text]
  • ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants
    Longleaf Pine Preserve Plant List Acanthaceae Asteraceae Wild Petunia Ruellia caroliniensis White Aster Aster sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Adoxaceae Begger-ticks Bidens mitis Walter's Viburnum Viburnum obovatum Deer Tongue Carphephorus paniculatus Pineland Daisy Chaptalia tomentosa Alismataceae Goldenaster Chrysopsis gossypina Duck Potato Sagittaria latifolia Cow Thistle Cirsium horridulum Tickseed Coreopsis leavenworthii Altingiaceae Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Oakleaf Fleabane Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Fleabane Erigeron sp. Amaryllidaceae Prairie Fleabane Erigeron strigosus Simpson's rain lily Zephyranthes simpsonii Fleabane Erigeron vernus Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Anacardiaceae Dog Fennel Eupatorium compositifolium Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum Dog Fennel Eupatorium spp. Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans Slender Flattop Goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana Flat-topped goldenrod Euthamia minor Annonaceae Cudweed Gamochaeta antillana Flag Pawpaw Asimina obovata Sneezeweed Helenium pinnatifidum Dwarf Pawpaw Asimina pygmea Blazing Star Liatris sp. Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Roserush Lygodesmia aphylla Rugel's pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii Hempweed Mikania cordifolia White Topped Aster Oclemena reticulata Apiaceae Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Button Rattlesnake Master Eryngium yuccifolium Rosy Camphorweed Pluchea rosea Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Pluchea Pluchea spp. Mock Bishopweed Ptilimnium capillaceum Rabbit Tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum
    [Show full text]