Brief Note: Vegetational History of Mentor Marsh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brief Note: Vegetational History of Mentor Marsh Copyright © 1981 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/81/0003-0105 $2.00/0 BRIEF NOTE VEGETATIONAL HISTORY OF MENTOR MARSH1 NEIL P. BERNSTEIN,2 Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights OH 44118 OHIO J. SCI. 81(3): 105, 1981 During the summer of 1976, a study of habitat selection by red-winged black- birds (Agelaius phoeniceus) was conducted at Mentor Marsh in Mentor, Ohio (Bernstein and McLean 1980). This paper is a summary of the material collected from written records and per- sonal communications concerning the vegetational history of Mentor Marsh plus my observations. A more detailed description and complete bibliography of the material presented can be found in Bernstein (1977). Topography and Geology FIGURE 1. Map of Mentor Marsh. A. Study Mentor Marsh Natural History Land- Area A, B. Study Area B, C. Study Area C, D. Wakerobin Trail, E. Becker Trail, F. Becker mark is located on the lake plains of Pond, G. School Forest, H. Shipman Wildlife north-central Lake County and covers Memorial at Shipman Pond, I. Black Brook. an area of approximately 800 acres. It Insert—Map of Ohio showing the approximate varies from 0.25 to 0.50 miles in width location of Mentor Marsh in Lake County. Stippled area—indicate open bodies of water and is approximately 4.50 miles long. within the marsh. Isajd (1966) states that the marsh is 600 ft above sea level and about 20 to 25 ft above Lake Erie. The angle of marsh in the south-east corner, the decline from the surrounding uplands stream becomes distributary and no to the marsh is usually below 20 degrees main channel can be discerned (see fig. 1). and it is most gentle on the eastern edge. Becker Pond and Shipman Pond are With exception of two natural highlands, the two largest bodies of open water, little change in elevation occurs within about 3 acres each, and several smaller the marsh. areas of open water exist, some seasonally. Three man-made structures presently The size and number of these areas of traverse the marsh (fig. 1). Corduroy open water are dependent upon amount Road allows vehicular traffic, while the of rainfall in any one year. Zimmerman Wakerobin Trail and the sewer Pipeline (1976) and Newhous (1976) point out between Becker Pond and the north that three areas east of Corduroy Road shore of the marsh are footpaths. Roads on the south shore were dynamited in no longer in use are also in evidence. the late 1960's in an attempt to create open water that would attract waterfowl. Black Brook is the only noticeable Mentor Marsh is geologically unusual surface stream, and upon entering the because, unlike northwest Ohio with 1Manuscript received 13 October 1978 and in its many marshes, marshes are not revised form 9 May 1980 (#78-61). common in northeast Ohio. The present 2Present address: Dept. of Ecology and Be- havioral Biology, 108 Zoology, Univ. of Min- marsh was probably formed from a nesota, Minneapolis MN 55455. westward flowing segment of the Grand 105 106 NEIL P. BERNSTEIN Vol. 81 River when, at some unknown time, the the marsh in the School Forest, and river formed a new easterly mouth into the southern border is mostly mixed Lake Erie and the isolated river segment, oaks. The remainder of the marsh, on a bedrock base surrounded by upland central and southeast portions, is a forests, developed into Mentor Marsh cattail-nightshade community. Neither (Aronson 1974, Bernstein 1977). the broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia) nor the narrow-leaved cattail (T. angusti- Vegetation of Mentor Marsh folia) was dominant at the time of It is not certain how the marsh Isard's study (1966) and both were appeared to the first settlers, but pub- associated with bittersweet nightshade lished interviews from early settlers to (Solarium dulcamara). This community the area provided clues (Gault 1957). still exists, but it has been almost It appears that the marsh was largely entirely replaced by common reed an open body of water until the early (Phragmites australis). 1800's, but by 1937, a dense swamp had developed in the eastern portion. Plant Succession and Communities By 1951, little herbaceous vegetation In the early 1800's, the marsh was was apparent and the swamp forest largely an open body of water that had covered most of the area. In 1959, a no substantial influx of water other than die-off of the swamp forest began that Black Brook. I assume that succession was witnessed by many area residents first created a marsh, followed by a (Zimmerman 1976) and is evidenced by swamp forest, that was replaced by the aerial photographs that indicate dying present marsh after the die-off. Aldrich trees (Bernstein 1977). It is not known (1943) described the primary successional why the die-off occurred, but leakage stage from marsh to swamp forest in of salt into Black Brook from surrounding northeastern Ohio as the Cephalanthus- salt mining operations or a fluctuating Alnus associes. At the time, the sere water table are possible explanations. consisted of buttonbush (Cephalanthus Isard (1966) divided the vegetation occidentalis) or speckled alder (Alnus into 5 communities: the cattail-night- rugosa). In my study, C. occidentalis shade (Typha-Solanutn) community, the was extremely rare, but A. rugosa was mixed-oak (Quercus) swamp forest, the common and it was often seen in the maple-ash-elm (A cer-Fraxinus- Ulmus) same habitat with common buckthorn swamp forest, the beech-maple (Fagus- (Rhamnus calhartica). Aldrich termed Acer) forest, and the buttonbush-willow the climax swamp forest community the (Cephalanthus-Salix) community. The Acer-Ulmus-Fraxinus associes. Of the buttonbush-willow community at Ship- characteristic primary dominants, red man Pond is no longer present due to maple (Acer rubrum), American elm flooding created by a beaver {Castor (Ulmus americana), and white ash canadensis) dam at the northeast corner (Fraxinus americana) are currently of the pond. Killed were the buttonbush common, but swamp white oak (Quercus (Cephalanthus occidentalis), swamp loose- bicolor), silver maple (Acer saccharinum), strife (Decodon verticillatus), and the black ash (Fraxinus nigra), and pin surrounding blackwillow (Salix nigra) oak (Quercis palustris) are less common as described by Aldrich (1943). (At the in Mentor Marsh. This is in agreement time of Aldrich's study, Shipman Pond with Isard's (1966) vegetation survey was referred to as Norton's Pond.) although Q. bicolor and F. nigra were The mixed-oak swamp forest, which then more common. is located on the extreme eastern edge Two secondary successional communi- of the marsh bordering on Heisley Road, ties were listed by Aldrich (1943): the is now largely dead trees as is the Cornus-Rosa-Spiraea associes and the majority of the maple-elm-ash swamp Salix-Populus-Quercus associes. Of the forest once present on the eastern edge first, red-osier dogwood (Cornus stoloni- of the marsh and in localized areas. fera), swamp rose (Rosa Carolina), and Beech-maple forest presently covers most elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) are of the uplands on the northern border of indicator plants that were found along Ohio J. Sci. VEGETATIONAL HISTORY OF MENTOR MARSH 107 Becker Trail. Narrow-leaved meadow- In Holland, where P. australis is used sweet (Spiraea alba) was not observed in land reclamation projects on land in my study or those of Isard (1966, that was formerly ocean bottom, it is 1967). The Salix-Populus-Quercus com- useful in removing salt from soil and munity is characteristic of the serai creating suitable substrate for terrestrial stage leading to the Quercus-Carya forest. plants (Newhous 1976). In such a Of typical species in this community, recently disturbed area, the invasion cottonwood (Populus deltoides) was com- and growth of P. austalis in a land mon along Becker Trail; Q. bicolor was reclamation project took place spontane- not common, but it was found in small ously and resulted in dense vegetation groups in the open marsh; Q. bicolor was within a few years. Perhaps this is common, but was found in small num- similar to the situation that occurred bers on Wakerobin Trail and in the in Mentor Marsh after the die-off dis- northeast corner of the marsh. Since turbed the natural succession in the area. these plants are typical of secondary Typha latifolia is usually found in succession, they may be an indication deeper water than T. angustifolia, and of a return to the swamp forest or they Phragmites australis is found in the driest may be remnants that survived the die- habitat (Sears 1916). I believe that this off of the first swamp forest. Isard is the sequence of biotic succession (1966) reported presence of poison sumac within the marsh. Studies by Keefe (Rhus vernix) that may have been (1974) and Jones (1975) indicate that associated with the swamp forest, and salt concentration is greatest where Newhous (personal communication 1976) Black Brook enters the marsh and that also encountered the plant while clearing salt concentration gradually decreases to vegetation to build Wakerobin Trail in the west. The most uniform stands of the 1920's. I found none in my study. P. australis are in the southeastern Mentor Marsh is presently covered by portion of the marsh where salt concen- herbaceous marsh vegetation over much tration is the highest. Therefore, P. of its area. Typha latifolia and T. australis would be expected to have a angustijolia were originally the two greater salt tolerance than the Typha dominant types of marsh vegetation species. This is, indeed, the case after the die-off. P. auslralis has rapidly (Penfound and Hathaway 1938, Rechav multiplied so that it is now the dominant 1967, van der Toorn 1972).
Recommended publications
  • Impact Fee Study Also Called for a Multimillion Dollar Indoor Facility but the Project Did Not Materialize Over the Last 10 Years
    Town of Amherst Impact Fees 2020 Basis of Assessment and Fee Schedules Public Schools Police Fire-Rescue Recreation Town Roads June 3, 2020 Prepared for: Town of Amherst 2 Main Street Amherst, New Hampshire 03031 Prepared by: P. O. Box 723 Yarmouth, ME 04096 [email protected] Table of Contents A. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Impact Fee Principles ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. Conditions for Impact Fee Assessment ................................................................................................. 3 2. Impact Fee Assessment, Collection, and Retention ............................................................................. 3 3. Units of Assessment ............................................................................................................................. 4 C. Proportionate Demand Measures ........................................................................................................... 5 1. Residential Development Trend........................................................................................................... 5 2. Employment and Commercial Development Trend ............................................................................ 8 D. Public Safety Impact Fees .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study
    TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY AND SYSTEMS PRESERVATION STUDY AMHERST, NEW HAMPSHIRE July, 2006 Prepared by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study for Amherst, New Hampshire July, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................I-1 A. THE ISSUES ................................................................................................................................. I-1 B. STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................................ I-1 C. NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................................ I-2 CHAPTER II: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................II-1 A. ORIGIN OF THE TCSP STUDY.................................................................................................... II-1 B. NRPC ROLE.............................................................................................................................. II-2 C. STUDY PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ II-2 D. REPORT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... II-2 CHAPTER III: TRAFFIC
    [Show full text]
  • 10-26-2020 Joint
    VILLAGE OF ESSEX JUNCTION TRUSTEES Online TOWN OF ESSEX SELECTBOARD Essex Junction, VT 05452 Monday, October 26, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 6:30 PM E-mail: [email protected] www.essexjunction.org Phone: (802) 878-1341 www.essexvt.org (802) 878-6951 Due to the Covid -19 pandemic, this meeting will be held remotely. Available options to watch or join the meeting: • WATCH: the meeting will be live-streamed on Town Meeting TV. • JOIN ONLINE : Join Microsoft Teams Meeting. Depending on your browser, you may need to call in for audio (below). • JOIN CALLING : Join via conference call (audio only): (802) 377-3784 | Conference ID: 142 554 11# • PROVIDE FULL NAME: For minutes, please provide your full name whenever prompted. • CHAT DURING MEETING: Please use “Chat” to request to speak, only. Please do not use for comments. • RAISE YOUR HAND: Click on the hand in Teams to speak or use the “Chat” feature to request to speak. • MUTE YOUR MIC: When not speaking, please mute your microphone on your computer/phone. The Selectboard and Trustees meet together to discuss and act on joint business. Each board votes separately on action items. 1. CALL TO ORDER [6:30 PM] 2. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES 3. APPROVE AGENDA 4. PUBLIC TO BE HEARD a. Comments from Public on Items Not on Agenda 5. BUSINESS ITEMS a. Approve Town of Essex / Village of Essex Junction Public Works Winter Operations Plan with COVID 19 Impacts 2020-2021 b. Accept traffic study with change in speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph on Sand Hill Road near Founders Road (Selectboard only) c.
    [Show full text]
  • February 7 and 14, 2008 LOCATION of CONFERENCES
    BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE REPORT DATE OF CONFERENCES: February 7 and 14, 2008 LOCATION OF CONFERENCES: J.O. Morton Building ATTENDED BY: Sarah Graulty, Christine Perron, Kevin Nyhan, Cathy Goodmen, Charles Hood, Marc Laurin, Mark Hemmerlein, Matt Urban, Phil Miles, Lisa Denoncourt, and Chris Waszczuk, NHDOT; Dick Boisvert and Beth Muzzey, NHDHR; Jamie Sikora, FHWA; Joe Klementovich, HEB; Jamie Paine, CLD; Cole Melendy and Rene LaBranch, Stantec; Gene McCarthy and Vicki Chase, MJ Inc.; Liz Hengen, Preservation Consultant; and Deb Loiselle, Jim Gallagher, Grace Levergood, and Steve Doyon, DES. SUBJECT: Monthly SHPO­FHWA­ACOE­NHDOT Cultural Resources Meeting Tuftonboro Rochester Hudson, STP­TE­X­5229(013), 13100 Auburn Nashua, X­A000(006), 10136A Concord X­A000(566), 14426 Pelham, X­A000(415), 14491 Bartlett 14372 Seabrook 12630 Portsmouth­Dover­Rochester 15304 Salem­Manchester, IM­IR­0931(174), 10418C Connecticut River Scenic Byway Phase I Nashua (Litchfield) 10644 Wakefield 14871 NHDES­Dam Bureau Thursday, February 7, 2008 Tuftonboro (no project numbers). Participant: Joe Klementovich, HEB Engineers ( [email protected]); Sue Weeks, Chair, Selectperson, Town of Tuftonboro, and Dick Boisvert, NHDHR The historical and archaeological impacts created by the replacement of four culverts and the re­ aligning of 1400 feet of Lang Pond Road which parallels Mirror Lake were examined. Joe Klementovich presented an overview of the project and the scope of work proposed for the improvements along Lang Pond Rd. Sue Weeks, the chair of the Tuftonboro Board of Selectman, presented historical aerial photographs, maps and documents relating to Native American trails in the area and identified the corridor as the Governor Wentworth Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas County Engineers Office Keith G
    Lucas County Engineers Office Keith G. Earley, P.E., P.S., Lucas County Engineer Richfield Center Road—Brint Road to Sylvania- Metamora Road Raab Road Bridge #275 Decant Road—Brown Road to S.R. 2 1 Hertzfeld Road—U.S. 24 to Vollmer Road Holloway Road—Salisbury Road to Garden Road Brown Road—Nissen Road to Turnau Road Lucas County Engineer’s Office JUNE 1st, 2012 One Government Center Responsible Action is Necessary A good highway system is a vital component of our economic prosperity. Suite 870 We depend on it to perform our daily commercial and personal activities. If we Toledo, Ohio 43604-2258 hope to maintain or improve our infrastructure, a suitable level of financial invest- ment is required. In Lucas County, our dedicated revenue for county maintained Phone: 419-213-4540 roads and bridges is slightly less than it was twelve years ago while overall costs Road Maintenance Department have increased over 50%, some costs such as asphalt paving have more than dou- bled, and the situation is similar across the state. We have reduced our workforce 2504 Detroit Avenue by 35%, and many people have taken on additional duties. We are doing what we Maumee, Ohio 43537 can to reduce our long term operating costs, to free up money for roadway preser- vation and improvement projects. We would like to make improvements that INSIDE THIS REPORT would last 15 years or more, but financial conditions have forced us to rely on pres- Responsibilities of the Engineer 3 ervation projects that will probably only last three to eight years.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Pond
    HARVARD POND: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY Prepared by Robert A. Clark 1889 SELECTED POINTS OF INTEREST 5 4 3 6 2 7 8 1 9 10 11 © Map courtesy of Harvard Forest – Modified A PLACE OF MANY NAMES: MEADOW WATER – BROOKS POND WEST POND – HARVARD POND 1 Ezra Pike's home. Just north is the dam and outflow from Harvard Pond, East Branch Fever Brook. Immediately north of the dam, between the pond and the road, is the site of a steam powered saw mill used to cut logs from trees downed by the 1938 hurricane. 2 A mystery farm – land use history with a red pine and European larch plantation which was cut in 2008. 3 Sawmill owned by the Southworth brothers of Hardwick in 1850. This mill cut the lumber for the new Town House (Town Hall) built in 1850. The mill was removed in 1865. 4 Mr. Gilson's home. Mr. Gilson probably sawed the lumber for the new Town House in 1850 which burned in 1957. On the north side of Tom Swamp Road was the home of William Pierce which was later the home of Deacon Levi Babbett. 5 Tom Swamp – an ancient red spruce, black spruce, tamarack quaking bog. The raised road (causeway ) over the wetlands is a corduroy road and the gravel that covers the logs which were laid crosswise in a ribbed pattern (hence corduroy) was taken from the borrows just east of the causeway. 6 Richard Thornton Fisher memorial – Richard Thornton Fisher was the first director of Harvard Forest. His memorial is located at one of his favorite spots of old growth forest overlooking the pond which was unfortunately devastated by the 1938 hurricane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mount Auburn Incline and the Lookout House by John H
    To restore public confidence after the 1889 crash the incline was rebuilt to show a change in grade. The Cincinnati Inclined Plane Railway Company: The Mount Auburn Incline and the Lookout House by John H. White, Jr. ackson Park, one of the most inaccessible parcels of public land in Cin- J cinnati, is situated at the end of a labyrinth of dead-end streets just east of Christ Hospital in Mount Auburn. Despite its forbidding approach, this obscure neck of land rising high above the city witnessed the beginnings of suburban public transit in Cincinnati. The city's first incline and earliest electric street railway of any length started at this location. Although a few suburban villages far from the urban center had been established early in the city's development, Mount Auburn was one of the first close-in hilltop communities to be settled. The lofty eminence of Jackson Hill which removed it from the bustle and confusion of the basin made it a desirable residential area. By the 1850's, a female seminary, Mount Auburn Young Ladies Institute, was in operation, broad avenues were graded, and the landscape was dotted with handsome estates. It was a rich man's com- munity from which the residents could afford private conveyance to the city, but there were some who desired the convenience and economy of public transit. This need was answered about 1850 by the establishment of an omnibus line. The horse-drawn bus was never satisfactory, however; it was slow, expensive, and often "crowded to suffocation inside with passengers of both sexes and 'many minds'.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension to Private Holdings--Minette Bay West
    Management Plan, Extension to Private Holdings, Minette Bay West District of Kitimat, June 2017 Extension to Private Holdings – Minette Bay West District of Kitimat 0 | Page Management Plan, Extension to Private Holdings, Minette Bay West District of Kitimat, June 2017 Background The District of Kitimat (DOK) is currently undertaking a planning and design exercise for 191 hectares of municipal land on the west side of Minette Bay. These lands, formally described as District Lots 471 and 95, and known as “Minette Bay West”, are designated as a future park in Kitimat’s Official Community Plan (OCP). This site presents a significant opportunity to provide much needed public access to the ocean, which is a key priority for Kitimat Council and the community. The planning process for Minette Bay West is a collaborative effort involving Kitimat Council, DOK staff, Haisla Nation staff, a consulting team, community members and stakeholders in Kitimat and Kitamaat. Three phases of concept planning work will be complete by early summer 2017. Council is expected to consider adoption of a final concept plan in summer 2017. Phase 1 of detailed design and construction is expected to follow in fall 2017, including a landscape plan, with construction start in 2018. Based on community feedback and with Council’s support, the District has applied for grant funding to assist with the first phase of development. Phase 1 would include an accessible trail, park and day use area and access road improvements. See Attachment A. The day use area abuts a causeway which was originally believed to be within DL 471.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Historic Roadway Study B) Design
    You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library Table of Contents TABLE of CONTENTS Acknowledgements . i Preface . vii I. Introduction . 1 II. Approach . 3 III. Methodology . 5 A. Stage I: Develop Historic Overview . 5 B. Stage II: Establish Historic Signifi cance . 5 C. Stage III: Identifi cation of Signifi cant Roadways . 6 D. Integrity Thresholds . 11 IV. Terms . 13 V. Roadways that Span Multiple Eras . 15 VI. Historic Contexts and Signifi cant Roads . 17 A. Early Roads Era (ca. 1621 - ca. 1815) . 17 1. Introduction . 17 2. Early Roads Era Historic Context . 17 a) Background . 17 b) Nature of Early Roads Era Traffi c . 23 c) Early Roads Era Road Technology . 23 d) Early Roads Era Administrative Innovation . 24 e) Conclusion . 25 3. Early Roads Era Signifi cant Routes . 26 a) Criteria for Signifi cance . 26 b) Signifi cant Routes . 26 4. Early Roads Era Associated Resources . 29 5. Early Roads Era Integrity Thresholds . 30 a) Location . 30 b) Design . 30 c) Materials . 30 d) Workmanship . 30 e) Setting . 30 f) Feeling . 31 g) Association . 31 6. Early Roads Era Timeline . 31 7. Research Questions . 33 B. Internal Improvements Era (ca. 1790 - ca. 1889) . 34 1. Introduction . 34 2. Internal Improvements Era Historic Context . 35 a) Background . 35 b) Nature of Internal Improvements Traffi c . 39 c) Technology . 39 d) Internal Improvements Era Administrative Innovation . 40 e) Conclusion . 41 3. Internal Improvements Era Signifi cant Routes . 42 a) Criteria for Signifi cance . 42 b) Signifi cant Routes .
    [Show full text]
  • Log Roads to Light Rails: the Evolution of Main Street and Transportation in Buffalo, New York," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 13 Article 6 1984 Log Roads to Light Rails: The volutE ion of Main Street and Transportation in Buffalo, New York Michael A. Cinquino Marvin G. Keller Carmine A. Tronolone Charles E. Vandrei Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Cinquino, Michael A.; Keller, Marvin G.; Tronolone, Carmine A.; and Vandrei, Charles E. Jr. (1984) "Log Roads to Light Rails: The Evolution of Main Street and Transportation in Buffalo, New York," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 13 13, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol13/iss1/6 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol13/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Log Roads to Light Rails: The volutE ion of Main Street and Transportation in Buffalo, New York Cover Page Footnote This article is a condensed and edited version of a report submitted to the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) in June 1981 (Ecology and Environment, Inc. 1981). Research on the Buffalo Log Road was conducted with public funds provided through PL 93-291. The NFTA and the engineering firm of Cordy, Carpenter, Dietz and Zack deserve special thanks for their cooperation and logistical support. Ecology and Environment, Inc. in particular Mr. Gerald Strobel, provided the corporate support required for the production of this paper; Patrica Kammer, who prepared the graphics for this paper; and Nancy Schiller, who edited the original report which was the basis of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Tape 2, Side 2
    Idaho Panhandle Oral History Project October 19, 1979 Janusch/Barton Tape 2; Side 2 DB: What is the longest trip do you remember taking from the area? HJ: (mumbled question) DB: Yeah. What is the farthest that you'd take a trip? HJ: Well, it was, uh, back to Minnesota.-- -. - - DB: Back to Minnesota? Um hum. DB: OK, and how would you get there? By train, or... HJ: No, model A (mumbled) coupe, back then. Four of us in it. DB: Hah. Did you ever take the train, when you were. ..? HJ : No, I never did. DB: OK, ahm. Since you've been here since the mid '20s, how's the train system developed, since you've been here? Has it, has it really been changing since you've been here, or was it pretty much all here, when you got here? HJ: Well, when I come to Coeur dtAlene, there was 20 trains a day into Coeur dVAlene--passenger trains. In the summer. DB: How about the, the timber trains--the lumber trains, where they pretty busy? HJ: Well, there's Ohio Match, it's Diamond now. They haul logs by train, from ah, (mumble) it's decided; cheaper way, into Coeur dlAlene and they had a trestle built out on the lake, and that's where they dump them. DB: What was the line, that was running those? HJ : That's the. ..that is the Spokane International, that is hauling the logs. DB: Can you remember any other logs, ah ..., railroad lines? Their names? HJ: That come into town? DB: Aha.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Mill and Back Fairfield’S Ash Creek Corduroy Road Acknowledgments Many People Generously Offered Their Time and As- Sistance in Preparation of This Booklet
    To the Mill and Back Fairfield’s Ash Creek Corduroy Road Acknowledgments Many people generously offered their time and as- sistance in preparation of this booklet. Douglas Roy- alty and Catherine Labadia at the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office provided guidance and improved the text with their editorial comments. Ed- ward H. Jones, Thomas Coarse, and Joanne Moura of the Town of Fairfield graciously assisted our staff during their visits to the site and provided information on the corduroy road. Dr. Gail Robinson, Ph.D., Presi- dent of Ash Creek Conservation Association Inc., and Bryan Quinn of OneNature, LLC assisted R. Christo- pher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. in locating historical sources and images of Ash Creek and Black Rock. Finally, we would like to thank David Brant, executive director of the Aspectuck Land Trust, and Michael Richardson, owner of Connecticutwilderness.com, for permission to use of photos in the booklet. This material is based on work assisted by a grant from the Historic Preservation Fund of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and is one component of the Hurricane Sandy grant pro- gram administered by the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office. Any opinions, findings, and con- clusions or recommendations expressed in this ma- The Ash Creek Open Space is an important element of Fairfield’s Open Space Program, which pre- terial are those of the author(s) and do not necessar- serves more than 1,100 acres of town-owned natural areas for public benefit (Photo courtesy of Connecticutwilderness.com) ily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]