DOCSLIB.ORG

Swift II Bus Rapid Transit Final Categorical Exclusion And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swift II Bus Rapid Transit Final Categorical Exclusion And Swift II Bus Rapid Transit Final Categorical Exclusion and Documented Categorical Worksheet As approved by FTA on March 31, 2016 Prepared for Prepared by Environmental Science Associates FTA Region 10 CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION and DOCUMENTED CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET Swift II Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – Boeing to Canyon Park Project Sponsoring Agency Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation (Community Transit) Date Approved March 31, 2016 Table of Contents I. Project Description .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. NEPA Class of Action ............................................................................................................................. 3 A. Will the project significantly impact the natural, social and/or economic environment? .................. 3 B. Does the project appear on the following list of Categorical Exclusions (CEs)? ............................. 3 C. Does the project appear on the following list of potential documented Categorical Exclusions? .... 4 III. Information Required for Documented Categorical Exclusions ....................................................... 5 A. Detailed Project Description ............................................................................................................. 5 B. Location and Zoning ......................................................................................................................... 9 C. Traffic ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 11 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 15 D. Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................................... 16 E. Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 18 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Greenhouse Gas ................................................................................................................................. 19 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 19 F. Coastal Zone .................................................................................................................................. 20 G. Environmental Justice .................................................................................................................... 20 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 20 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Outreach Efforts Targeted Specifically at Minority or Low-Income Populations. ................................ 22 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 22 H. Floodplains ..................................................................................................................................... 23 I. Hazardous Materials ...................................................................................................................... 23 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 23 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 24 J. Navigable Waterways .................................................................................................................... 24 K. Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................................................ 24 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 25 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 27 DRAFT DCE Worksheet i March 31, 2016 L. Prime and Unique Farmlands ........................................................................................................ 28 M. Historic & Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 28 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 29 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 30 N. Biological ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 32 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 34 O. Recreational ................................................................................................................................... 34 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 35 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 35 Findings and conclusions .................................................................................................................... 36 P. Seismic and Soils ........................................................................................................................... 36 Q. Water Quality ................................................................................................................................. 37 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 37 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 38 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 39 R. Wetlands ........................................................................................................................................ 40 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 40 Project Effects ..................................................................................................................................... 40 Findings and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 42 S. Construction Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 42 T. Cumulative and Indirect Impacts .................................................................................................... 44 U. Property Acquisition ....................................................................................................................... 44 V. Energy ............................................................................................................................................ 45 W. Public Involvement ......................................................................................................................... 46 X. Mitigation Measures ....................................................................................................................... 46 Temporary Construction .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact Fee Study Also Called for a Multimillion Dollar Indoor Facility but the Project Did Not Materialize Over the Last 10 Years
    Town of Amherst Impact Fees 2020 Basis of Assessment and Fee Schedules Public Schools Police Fire-Rescue Recreation Town Roads June 3, 2020 Prepared for: Town of Amherst 2 Main Street Amherst, New Hampshire 03031 Prepared by: P. O. Box 723 Yarmouth, ME 04096 [email protected] Table of Contents A. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Impact Fee Principles ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. Conditions for Impact Fee Assessment ................................................................................................. 3 2. Impact Fee Assessment, Collection, and Retention ............................................................................. 3 3. Units of Assessment ............................................................................................................................. 4 C. Proportionate Demand Measures ........................................................................................................... 5 1. Residential Development Trend........................................................................................................... 5 2. Employment and Commercial Development Trend ............................................................................ 8 D. Public Safety Impact Fees .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Draft Long Range Plan February 2018
    CONNECTING YOUR FUTURE Everett Transit DRAFT LONG RANGE PLAN Everett Transit Long Range Plan 1 Connecting Your Future 2 Connecting Your Future Table of CONTENTS i Executive Summary i 1 Why a Long Range Plan? 1 2 Transit Today and in the Future 4 3 Everett Transit’s Role 10 4 Our Plan to Move Forward 13 5 Our Financial Future 16 6 Strategy for Implementation 19 Everett Transit Draft Long Range Plan Everett Transit Long Range Plan 3 Connecting Your Future The Goals of the Plan Everett Transit provides safe, customer-focused, cost-efficient, and effective public transit and transportation management services in support of sustainable growth and a livable community. This Long Range Plan services three main goals: 1 Identify future transit service 2 Determine options for implementation 3 Establish service standards Everett Transit Draft Long Range Plan i Everett Transit Long Range Plan i How the Community Helped Develop a Growth Network Plan Everett Transit went out to the community throughout 2017 to help define the vision for transit in the future and to gather feedback on how service should be provided to support continued growth in the region. Respondents described the role they see for Everett Transit in the region and they highlighted their priorities for transit. What We Heard Provide a locally-focused transit network with high frequency and expanded service hours that connects to key destinations and regional transit services. Everett Transit Growth Network Route Frequency (Peak) !#"5 Marysville 15-20 MInutes 30 Minutes E M r a D ri
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study
    TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY AND SYSTEMS PRESERVATION STUDY AMHERST, NEW HAMPSHIRE July, 2006 Prepared by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission Transportation and Community and Systems Preservation Study for Amherst, New Hampshire July, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................I-1 A. THE ISSUES ................................................................................................................................. I-1 B. STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................................ I-1 C. NEXT STEPS ................................................................................................................................ I-2 CHAPTER II: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................II-1 A. ORIGIN OF THE TCSP STUDY.................................................................................................... II-1 B. NRPC ROLE.............................................................................................................................. II-2 C. STUDY PROCESS ........................................................................................................................ II-2 D. REPORT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... II-2 CHAPTER III: TRAFFIC
    [Show full text]
  • 10-26-2020 Joint
    VILLAGE OF ESSEX JUNCTION TRUSTEES Online TOWN OF ESSEX SELECTBOARD Essex Junction, VT 05452 Monday, October 26, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 6:30 PM E-mail: [email protected] www.essexjunction.org Phone: (802) 878-1341 www.essexvt.org (802) 878-6951 Due to the Covid -19 pandemic, this meeting will be held remotely. Available options to watch or join the meeting: • WATCH: the meeting will be live-streamed on Town Meeting TV. • JOIN ONLINE : Join Microsoft Teams Meeting. Depending on your browser, you may need to call in for audio (below). • JOIN CALLING : Join via conference call (audio only): (802) 377-3784 | Conference ID: 142 554 11# • PROVIDE FULL NAME: For minutes, please provide your full name whenever prompted. • CHAT DURING MEETING: Please use “Chat” to request to speak, only. Please do not use for comments. • RAISE YOUR HAND: Click on the hand in Teams to speak or use the “Chat” feature to request to speak. • MUTE YOUR MIC: When not speaking, please mute your microphone on your computer/phone. The Selectboard and Trustees meet together to discuss and act on joint business. Each board votes separately on action items. 1. CALL TO ORDER [6:30 PM] 2. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES 3. APPROVE AGENDA 4. PUBLIC TO BE HEARD a. Comments from Public on Items Not on Agenda 5. BUSINESS ITEMS a. Approve Town of Essex / Village of Essex Junction Public Works Winter Operations Plan with COVID 19 Impacts 2020-2021 b. Accept traffic study with change in speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph on Sand Hill Road near Founders Road (Selectboard only) c.
    [Show full text]
  • February 7 and 14, 2008 LOCATION of CONFERENCES
    BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE REPORT DATE OF CONFERENCES: February 7 and 14, 2008 LOCATION OF CONFERENCES: J.O. Morton Building ATTENDED BY: Sarah Graulty, Christine Perron, Kevin Nyhan, Cathy Goodmen, Charles Hood, Marc Laurin, Mark Hemmerlein, Matt Urban, Phil Miles, Lisa Denoncourt, and Chris Waszczuk, NHDOT; Dick Boisvert and Beth Muzzey, NHDHR; Jamie Sikora, FHWA; Joe Klementovich, HEB; Jamie Paine, CLD; Cole Melendy and Rene LaBranch, Stantec; Gene McCarthy and Vicki Chase, MJ Inc.; Liz Hengen, Preservation Consultant; and Deb Loiselle, Jim Gallagher, Grace Levergood, and Steve Doyon, DES. SUBJECT: Monthly SHPO­FHWA­ACOE­NHDOT Cultural Resources Meeting Tuftonboro Rochester Hudson, STP­TE­X­5229(013), 13100 Auburn Nashua, X­A000(006), 10136A Concord X­A000(566), 14426 Pelham, X­A000(415), 14491 Bartlett 14372 Seabrook 12630 Portsmouth­Dover­Rochester 15304 Salem­Manchester, IM­IR­0931(174), 10418C Connecticut River Scenic Byway Phase I Nashua (Litchfield) 10644 Wakefield 14871 NHDES­Dam Bureau Thursday, February 7, 2008 Tuftonboro (no project numbers). Participant: Joe Klementovich, HEB Engineers ( [email protected]); Sue Weeks, Chair, Selectperson, Town of Tuftonboro, and Dick Boisvert, NHDHR The historical and archaeological impacts created by the replacement of four culverts and the re­ aligning of 1400 feet of Lang Pond Road which parallels Mirror Lake were examined. Joe Klementovich presented an overview of the project and the scope of work proposed for the improvements along Lang Pond Rd. Sue Weeks, the chair of the Tuftonboro Board of Selectman, presented historical aerial photographs, maps and documents relating to Native American trails in the area and identified the corridor as the Governor Wentworth Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 5, 2019 6:00 PM
    Council Chambers, 18415 101st Ave NE, Bothell, WA City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 5, 2019 6:00 PM Members of the City Council: Mayor Andy Rheaume, Deputy Mayor Davina Duerr, Councilmember Tom Agnew, Councilmember Rosemary McAuliffe, Councilmember James McNeal, Councilmember Liam Olsen, Councilmember Jeanne Zornes Members of the Staff: City Manager Jennifer Phillips, Assistant City Manager Torie Brazitis, City Attorney Paul Byrne, Public Works Director Erin Leonhart, Interim Finance Director Maureen Schols, Community & Economic Development Director Michael Kattermann, Parks & Recreation Director Nik Stroup, Human Resources Director Mathew Pruitt, Information Services Director Joe Sherman, Police Chief Carol Cummings, Fire Chief Bruce Kroon, City Clerk Laura Hathaway 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, Pledge of Allegiance 2. Meeting Agenda Approval 3. Review Public Engagement Opportunities 4. Special Presentations a. Bothell Kenmore Chamber of Commerce – Andrea Schafer & Brittany Caldwell b. Community Transit Update- Swift Green Line Project – Emmett Heath & June DeVoll 5. Staff Briefings a. WSDOT I-405 Northend Project Update- Sherman Goong 6. City Manager/Council Committee Reports 7. Visitor Comment During this portion of the meeting, the Mayor will invite visitor comment. Each speaker will be granted 3 minutes 8. Consent Pgs. 5-16 a. Minutes – January, 2019 Recommended Action: Approve the City Council Meeting Minutes of the January 7 Special Meeting, the January 8 Regular Meeting, and the January 15 Special and Regular Meetings as presented. City Council Regular Meeting March 5, 2019 Page 2 of 4 Pgs. 17-18 b. AB # 19-028 – December 1-31, 2018 and January 1-31, 2019 Vouchers Recommended Action: Approve the following December 1-31, 2018 and January 1-31, 2019 vouchers totaling $9,070,229.66 that were approved and paid by the City Auditor.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas County Engineers Office Keith G
    Lucas County Engineers Office Keith G. Earley, P.E., P.S., Lucas County Engineer Richfield Center Road—Brint Road to Sylvania- Metamora Road Raab Road Bridge #275 Decant Road—Brown Road to S.R. 2 1 Hertzfeld Road—U.S. 24 to Vollmer Road Holloway Road—Salisbury Road to Garden Road Brown Road—Nissen Road to Turnau Road Lucas County Engineer’s Office JUNE 1st, 2012 One Government Center Responsible Action is Necessary A good highway system is a vital component of our economic prosperity. Suite 870 We depend on it to perform our daily commercial and personal activities. If we Toledo, Ohio 43604-2258 hope to maintain or improve our infrastructure, a suitable level of financial invest- ment is required. In Lucas County, our dedicated revenue for county maintained Phone: 419-213-4540 roads and bridges is slightly less than it was twelve years ago while overall costs Road Maintenance Department have increased over 50%, some costs such as asphalt paving have more than dou- bled, and the situation is similar across the state. We have reduced our workforce 2504 Detroit Avenue by 35%, and many people have taken on additional duties. We are doing what we Maumee, Ohio 43537 can to reduce our long term operating costs, to free up money for roadway preser- vation and improvement projects. We would like to make improvements that INSIDE THIS REPORT would last 15 years or more, but financial conditions have forced us to rely on pres- Responsibilities of the Engineer 3 ervation projects that will probably only last three to eight years.
    [Show full text]
  • Swift Orange Line BRT Everett, Washington Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2020)
    Swift Orange Line BRT Everett, Washington Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2020) Summary Description Proposed Project: Bus Rapid Transit 11.3 Miles, 13 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $80.97 Million Section 5309 CIG Share ($YOE): $37.15 Million (45.9%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2024): $8.86 Million 2,100 Daily Linked Trips Current Year Ridership Forecast (2017): 635,100 Annual Linked Trips 3,400 Daily Linked Trips Horizon Year Ridership Forecast (2030): 1,035,300 Annual Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area, known as Community Transit (CT), proposes to implement bus rapid transit (BRT) in the corridor between Edmonds Community College in Lynnwood and the McCollum Park- Park and Ride in Mill Creek. The project includes improvements to two existing transit centers/park and ride facilities, 13 vehicles, queue bypass lanes, and transit signal priority. The service is planned to operate 19 hours per day, with buses every 10 minutes during weekdays and every 20 minutes in the evenings and on weekends. Project Purpose: The corridor includes several important activity centers such as Edmonds Community College, Lynnwood Transit Center, Alderwood Mall, and Mill Creek Town Center. The project is planned to include fast, frequent and reliable transit service connecting these activity centers as well as to two other Swift BRT lines and Sound Transit light rail service. Project Development History, Status and Next Steps: The locally preferred alternative was selected in October 2018. The project entered Small Starts Project Development in November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Pond
    HARVARD POND: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY Prepared by Robert A. Clark 1889 SELECTED POINTS OF INTEREST 5 4 3 6 2 7 8 1 9 10 11 © Map courtesy of Harvard Forest – Modified A PLACE OF MANY NAMES: MEADOW WATER – BROOKS POND WEST POND – HARVARD POND 1 Ezra Pike's home. Just north is the dam and outflow from Harvard Pond, East Branch Fever Brook. Immediately north of the dam, between the pond and the road, is the site of a steam powered saw mill used to cut logs from trees downed by the 1938 hurricane. 2 A mystery farm – land use history with a red pine and European larch plantation which was cut in 2008. 3 Sawmill owned by the Southworth brothers of Hardwick in 1850. This mill cut the lumber for the new Town House (Town Hall) built in 1850. The mill was removed in 1865. 4 Mr. Gilson's home. Mr. Gilson probably sawed the lumber for the new Town House in 1850 which burned in 1957. On the north side of Tom Swamp Road was the home of William Pierce which was later the home of Deacon Levi Babbett. 5 Tom Swamp – an ancient red spruce, black spruce, tamarack quaking bog. The raised road (causeway ) over the wetlands is a corduroy road and the gravel that covers the logs which were laid crosswise in a ribbed pattern (hence corduroy) was taken from the borrows just east of the causeway. 6 Richard Thornton Fisher memorial – Richard Thornton Fisher was the first director of Harvard Forest. His memorial is located at one of his favorite spots of old growth forest overlooking the pond which was unfortunately devastated by the 1938 hurricane.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Gaps Analysis Executive Summary
    2020 GAPS ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A variety of unique transportation gaps exist in North King County, an area that includes the cities of North Seattle, Shoreline, Bothell, Kenmore, Lake Forest Park, and Woodinville. These gaps may be spatial, temporal, institutional, infrastructural, or awareness gaps. Seeing these needs, a community task force supported by the North King County Mobility Coalition formed to understand the region's unique needs better. The purpose of this analysis is to: Understand the mobility challenges in the North King County region for populations with special transportation needs and, in doing so, better coordinate members and service providers to facilitate mobility improvement projects. As a result of this analysis, the North King County Mobility Coalition has identified several prioritized projects and actions for the region. Whether you’re a resident, an elected official, a human service organization, or a private business, a unified voice is required to enact these changes and ensure transportation better serves people throughout North King County. We invite you to join in on these conversations. Accomplishing projects related to the needs identified in this report will result in many benefits for the region and the people our coalition aims to serve. The most prominent recommendations for the North King County Region identified by this report are as follows: ► Directly engage with all North King County cities around transportation issues outlined in this Gaps Analysis and implement actions that will address these issues. ► Increase outreach to underserved communities, especially limited English speakers. ► Alternative services should be as low-barrier as possible with their intake process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mount Auburn Incline and the Lookout House by John H
    To restore public confidence after the 1889 crash the incline was rebuilt to show a change in grade. The Cincinnati Inclined Plane Railway Company: The Mount Auburn Incline and the Lookout House by John H. White, Jr. ackson Park, one of the most inaccessible parcels of public land in Cin- J cinnati, is situated at the end of a labyrinth of dead-end streets just east of Christ Hospital in Mount Auburn. Despite its forbidding approach, this obscure neck of land rising high above the city witnessed the beginnings of suburban public transit in Cincinnati. The city's first incline and earliest electric street railway of any length started at this location. Although a few suburban villages far from the urban center had been established early in the city's development, Mount Auburn was one of the first close-in hilltop communities to be settled. The lofty eminence of Jackson Hill which removed it from the bustle and confusion of the basin made it a desirable residential area. By the 1850's, a female seminary, Mount Auburn Young Ladies Institute, was in operation, broad avenues were graded, and the landscape was dotted with handsome estates. It was a rich man's com- munity from which the residents could afford private conveyance to the city, but there were some who desired the convenience and economy of public transit. This need was answered about 1850 by the establishment of an omnibus line. The horse-drawn bus was never satisfactory, however; it was slow, expensive, and often "crowded to suffocation inside with passengers of both sexes and 'many minds'.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry's September 2016 Newsletter
    Councilmember Terry Ryan September, 2016 Issue: # Day/Month/Year Terry's September 2016 Newsletter QUICK L INKS 3000 Rockefeller Ave., M/S 609 Everett, Washington 98201 Office: 8th floor, Robert J. Drewel Building Phone: 425-388-3494 Share with a Friend E-Mail: [email protected] Snohomish County Council Assessor S erviices S n oh omiish Cou n ty Homepage Cou n ty Cou n ciill Homepage Liin k to Cou n ciill Webcasts ________________________ Evergreen State Fair recap Ellectiion In formatiion Jaiill Regiister Job Opportu n iitiies Ou tstan diin g Warran ts Pu blliic Records Marriiage Liicen ses Property In formatiion Recorded Docu men ts Regiistered S ex Offen ders S olliid Waste S erviices Zon iin g Maps ________________________ Keep In formed On Neiigh borh ood Devellopmen t Projjects B u iilldiin g Permiit an d Lan d Another year of success at the Evergreen State Fair in Use Actiiviity Reports Monroe! Con stru ctiion Traffiic Allerts Vollu n teer Opportu n iitiies We take great pride in our county fair and in all of the family Wh o represen ts you ? friendly activities such as-free entertainment at the Courtyard _____________________________ S u bscriibe to S n oh omiish stage, livestock shows and competition, equestrian, rodeo, Cou n ty''s Week lly Roads arts and crafts, rides, carnival, 4H presentations and Con stru ctiion Update competition, many food options (love those scones!) and fantastic concerts with Christian singers Mercy Me and Jeremy Camp, Country singer Hunter Hayes (Incredible concert!), 80's star Pat Benatar and others.
    [Show full text]