DOCSLIB.ORG

Eq134 Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eq134 Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Draft THIS REPORT RELATES STIRLING COUNCIL TO ITEM ON THE AGENDA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 6 SEPTEMBER 2001 NOT EXEMPT LOCH LOMOND AND THE TROSSACHS NATIONAL PARK DRAFT DESIGNATION ORDER CONSULTATION RESPONSE 1 PURPOSE 1.1 To comment to the Scottish Ministers on the proposal for the designation of the new National Park for Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. 2 SUMMARY 2.1 This is the last consultation on the establishment of the National Park and focuses on boundaries, powers and representation. The progress towards establishing the National Park is welcomed, however it is recommended that the Council argues for the inclusion of Killin as an area within the National Park, and argues for the exclusion of Loch Earn and St Fillans. It is also proposed that the Council again seeks confirmation that the Scottish Executive will ensure that the National Park is wholly and adequately funded with no adverse impact on local authority capital or revenue budgets. 3 RECOMMENDATION(S) 3.1 That the Council welcomes the continuing progress towards the designation of the new National Park for Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. 3.2 That the detailed comments based on this report are submitted by the Director of Environmental Services as the Council’s response to the consultations being carried out by the Scottish Ministers on the Draft Designation Order. 3.3 That the Council seeks early confirmation from the Scottish Executive that the National Park will be centrally funded, and its establishment will have no adverse impacts on capital or revenue budgets. 4 CONSIDERATIONS Background 4.1 Stirling Council and its predecessors have been a long time supporter of the establishment of a National Park for the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs N:\DEMSUPP\NEWDECISIONS\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\EQ20010906-EQ195MS.DOC area. The Council responded to the consultation on boundaries and powers carried by SNH, acting as “reporter” on the proposals for the National Park, (Stirling Council report 8 March 2001). In that response to consultation, the Council’s position on the area was that it should be restricted to the core area. Comments on the other aspects of the powers and responsibilities have largely been reflected in the Draft Designation Order. The detailed response to be submitted is given in full as appendix, however the following paragraphs deal with those areas of most contention. Area of the Park – Boundaries. 4.2 There are 3 contentious parts of the Park, where it is considered that the boundaries proposed by the Executive in the designation order would not be in the best interests of the National Park, the respective communities, or the Council; these are considered individually below (see attached Map). The criteria for an area to be included in the National Park, specified in the National Park Act , sect 1(2), are:- a) Outstanding national importance because of natural, or combination of natural and cultural heritage. b) Distinctive character and coherent identity. c) Designation would meet the special needs of the area and would be the best means of ensuring that the National Park aims are achieved in a co-ordinated way. The aims of National Parks are specified in the Act as: - a) Conserve and enhance natural and cultural heritage. b) Promote sustainable use of natural resources of the area. c) Promote understanding and enjoyment (including recreation) of special qualities if the area. d) Promote sustainable economic and social development of areas communities. 4.3 Killin and east Glen Dochart - this area is excluded, and it is recommended that the Council argues for its inclusion in the National Park, because it clearly meets the criteria for inclusion; it is also argued that the inclusion of Killin will add to the quality of the National Park; operationally the Park and Council boundaries should coincide. 4.4 Loch Earn and St Fillans - this area is included, and it is recommended that the Council argue for its exclusion from the National Park, because it does not meet the criteria for inclusion. It is also argued that as this area is of separate cultural and administrative character, that its inclusion would lead to unbalanced representation, confusion and poor service delivery. The argument for the inclusion of Loch Earn is founded on the management of the water body, and a convincing case that this is less easy or unachievable through other mechanisms has not been made; a similar argument could be made for Loch Tay. 4.5 Port and Lake of Menteith; this area is included. It is recommended that the Council does not argue for either the inclusion or exclusion, but questions the wisdom of including this area which is not fundamental to the integrity of the new National Park when there is opposition from the local community. 4.6 There are some local boundary positions which may not be the most appropriate or effective. These may be identified by local community and Members. An example would be the Pots of Gartness, where the hamlet is N:\DEMSUPP\NEWDECISIONS\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\EQ20010906-EQ195MS.DOC excluded. These will be considered for inclusion in the Council’s response in consultation with the Local Member and Chair if necessary. Representation 4.7 With the addition of part of Perth and Kinross Council’s area, the representation of the Council on the National Park Authority reduces from 5 members to 4, (one of which is to be a “local” member), to allow a member from Perth and Kinross to become a member of the Authority. Given the size of the population, which Stirling Council represents, within the Park, the number of members is democratically disproportionate, given that Stirling Council area will include 56% of the population and Perth and Kinross 2%. Appropriate Local Authority representation is essential in that the Park Authority with limited powers will require to work in partnership with the Council if it is to fulfil its obligations. Powers 4.8 The powers of the proposed Park Authority are similar to those of the previous consultations, and include all planning powers except structure planning. This accords with the Council’s previous position, and no comments on this aspect are proposed. 5 POLICY IMPLICATIONS 5.1 The establishment of the National Park for Loch Lomond and the Trossachs has long been an aim of the Council. The reduced representation of the Council on the Park Authority would be contrary to the Council objective of encouraging local democracy. The inclusion of part of Perth and Kinross within the Park and the exclusion of the Killin area would not be in the interests of Quality Service Provision, or in creating a “natural” unit for tourism and visitor management purposes. 6 CONSULTATIONS 6.1 None outwith the Council; the Scottish Executive is undertaking this consultation exercise, including public meetings throughout the area. 7 RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS 7.1 None consequential on the subject of this paper, but the establishment of the National Park will have some resource implications for next years revenue budgeting. 8 BACKGROUND PAPERS 8.1 Environmental Quality Committee Report - 24 February 2000 8.2 Stirling Council Committee Report - 8 March 2001 8.3 Stirling Council Committee Report - 28 June 2001 N:\DEMSUPP\NEWDECISIONS\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\EQ20010906-EQ195MS.DOC Author(s) Name Designation Tel No/Extension Mick Stewart Head of Planning & Ext 2958 Environmental Strategy Approved by Name Designation Signature David Martin Director of Environmental Services Date 24 August 2001 Reference N:\DEMSUPP\NEWDECISIONS\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\EQ20010906-EQ195MS.DOC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inchmahome Priory Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID:PIC073 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90169); Gardens and Designed Landscapes (GDL00218) Taken into State care: 1926 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2012 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE INCHMAHOME PRIORY We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH INCHMAHOME PRIORY SYNOPSIS Inchmahome Priory nestles on the tree-clad island of Inchmahome, in the Lake of Menteith. It was founded by Walter Comyn, 4th Earl of Menteith, c.1238, though there was already a religious presence on the island.
    [Show full text]
  • CITATION LAKE of MENTEITH SITE of SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST Stirling Site Code: 900
    CITATION LAKE OF MENTEITH SITE OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST Stirling Site code: 900 PLANNING AUTHORITY: Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park Authority NATIONAL GRID REFERENCE: NN 577005 OS 1:50,000 SHEET NO: Landranger Series 57 1:25,000 SHEET NO: Explorer Series 365 AREA: 485.49 hectares NOTIFIED NATURAL FEATURES Geological: Quaternary geology and geomorphology: Quaternary of Scotland Biological: Freshwater habitats : Mesotrophic loch Vascular plants : Vascular plant assemblage Birds : Pink-footed goose DESCRIPTION Lake of Menteith Site of Scientific Interest (SSSI) is located in the Carse of Stirling, 5 km to the east of Aberfoyle. The site is notified for its mesotrophic loch, vascular plant assemblage, pink-footed goose population and Quaternary of Scotland features. The lake contains the most diverse aquatic plant community mosaics in standing water in the Stirling district, along with a well developed succession of habitats from open water to woodland. The banks along the eastern shoreline of the lake are notified for its Quaternary of Scotland geological interest. Exposures in these banks reveal shelly marine clay overlain by the sands and gravels of the Menteith moraine. Marine shells from these sediments have been used to date the Loch Lomond Readvance. Dates directly related to this glacial readvance are only available from a few sites in Britain. Mesotrophic freshwater systems are especially uncommon in lowland Britain, and are under threat from nutrient enrichment. The succession of habitats from open water through swamp to carr, grassland and woodland is well developed around the lake because of its broad, shallow periphery, the low, natural fluctuation of its water level and the lack of disturbance along its shores.
    [Show full text]
  • Designed Landscape Assessment in Relation to Sensitivity To
    Name Local Designed Other designations Guidelines in Recommendations from LLTNP Non Contribution made by Landscape Elements to Analysis of overall Landscape Landscape (LDL) or Inventory Designed Landscapes (DL) Study or Landscape Character. sensitivities of designed Gardens and Historic Environment Scotland (HES) Inventory of landscapes to woodland Designed Gardens and Designed Landscapes (GDL). creation. (LLTNP Landscape Landscapes (GDL) Adviser.) Kinnell LDL Significant tree avenues, two straight drives; one Contibutes to a small extent but is a key location No views of this landscape backdropped by the west end of Tarmachan ridge in the local landscape. apart from footpath over viewed with Auchmore. Boundary belts and Kinnell viaduct. woods. Ardvorlich LDL SSSI – Woodland Parkland trees. Drive and frontage to house. North The parkland contributes to the wider landscape Potential loss of parkland and boundary belt. Important locally south side of qualities of Loch Earn. open pasture features in Loch Earn. foreground views over Loch and along B road (South Loch Earn Road). Edinample LDL SSSI – non Picturesque composition on south Loch Earn, fine Strategic location at head of loch and contribution Significant in Low woodland views over Loch Earn, good views of its setting to landscape character. local landscape from Lochearnhead. and wider panoramas. Edinchip LDL SSSI – Woodland Parkland trees need to be restocked. There are no Parkland character in lower glen around house Potential in higher hill areas views from A84, route of NCR7/Rob Roy Way and strong links to past and present transport passes through. There are views across to east routes. and north east. Wider setting and character dominated by conifer plantations with potential for broadleaves and restructuring.
    [Show full text]
  • River Forth Catchment Profile
    Published September 2011 River Forth catchment profile Introduction The River Forth catchment encompasses a large area – approximately 1029 km2. As can be seen in Figure 1, the catchment not only contains the River Forth itself, but also major tributaries such as the River Teith. Figure 1: River Forth catchment Land-use within the catchment is predominantly rural, comprising managed forests and farmland. The Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park covers a significant portion of the upper reaches of the catchment. In the lower-lying reaches, a greater degree of urbanisation can be seen with the City of Stirling and surrounding villages, interspersed with agricultural holdings. Water resources are important within this catchment with the lochs and reservoirs serving important functions in the supply of drinking water – indeed Loch Katrine plays a vital role in providing Glasgow with much of its water. In addition, the development of small-scale micro hydro generation schemes are increasing within the catchment. The catchment contains 46 baseline1 surface water bodies, six of which are heavily modified. These heavily modified water bodies have been designated because of the modifications necessary to enable the supply of drinking water. There are five groundwater bodies associated with the catchment. Further information on the River Forth catchment can be found on the RBMP interactive map. 1 A baseline water body is a river which drains a catchment greater than 10km 2, lochs bigger than 0.5km2, all coastal waters out to three nautical miles, transitional waters such as estuaries and groundwaters. A non-baseline water body is a river or loch which falls below the size threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Tools for Toponymy: Their Application to Scottish Hydronymy
    Analytical Tools for Toponymy: Their Application to Scottish Hydronymy Jacob King MSc. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2008 i I declare that this thesis is entirely my own work. Jacob King Abstract It has long been observed that there is a correlation between the physical qualities of a watercourse and the linguistic qualities of its name; for instance, of two river-names, one having the linguistic quality of river as its generic element, and one having burn, one would expect the river to be the longer of the two. Until now, a phenomenon such as this had never been formally quantified.The primary focus of this thesis is to create, within a Scottish context, a methodology for elucidating the relationship between various qualities of hydronyms and the qualities of the watercourses they represent. The area of study includes every catchment area which falls into the sea from the River Forth, round the east coast of Scotland, up to and including the Spey; also included is the east side of the River Leven / Loch Lomond catchment area.The linguistic strata investigated are: Early Celtic, P-Celtic, Gaelic and Scots. In the first half of the introduction scholarly approaches to toponymy are discussed, in a Scottish and hydronymic context, from the inception of toponymy as a discipline up to the present day; the capabilities and limitations of these approaches are taken into consideration.In the second half the approaches taken in this thesis are outlined.The second chapter explains and justifies in more detail the methodology and calculus used in this thesis.The subsequent chapters examine the following linguistic components of a hydronym: generic elements, linguistic strata, semantics and phonological overlay.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of a Lateglacial Mountain Ice Cap in Northern Scotland
    Evolution of a Lateglacial mountain ice cap in northern Scotland ANDREW FINLAYSON, NICK GOLLEDGE, TOM BRADWELL AND DEREK FABEL Detailed geomorphological mapping of the Beinn Dearg massif in northern Scotland, was conducted to examine the maximum (Younger Dryas) extent, and earlier interstadial evolution, of an ice cap that existed during the Lateglacial period (14.7 – 11.7 cal. ka BP). Landform evidence indicates a plateau ice cap configuration, with radial outlet glaciers, during the Younger Dryas. The interpreted age is supported by new cosmogenic exposure ages, and previously reported interstadial sediments beyond the ice cap margin. The reconstructed Younger Dryas Beinn Dearg ice cap covered 176 km2, with its summit positioned over the western side of the massif. Area-altitude balance ratio (AABR) equilibrium line altitudes (ELAs) of 570 – 580 m were calculated for the ice cap as a whole. The empirically reconstructed ice cap is compared with recent numerical model simulations; both methods produce an ice cap with a similar configuration. However, differences are apparent in the extent of eastern and western outlets (±1–5 km), and in the spatial variation of ELAs. Results suggest that the numerical simulation over-estimates the extent of western ice cap sectors, and under-estimates the extent of eastern ice cap sectors. We attempt to quantify these differences in terms of ice cap mass balance and assess their possible causes. Geomorphological evidence for pre-Younger Dryas ice cap configuration indicates that the Beinn Dearg massif remained an important source during earlier deglaciation. In contrast, the neighbouring Fannich mountains acted as an ‘unzipping’ zone, and were ice free on their northern side by the Allerød (Greenland Interstadial 1c to 1a).
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 30 May 2017 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Bickerdike, H.L. and O¡ Cofaigh, C. and Evans, D.J.A and Stokes, C.R. (2018) 'Glacial landsystems, retreat dynamics and controls on Loch Lomond Stadial (Younger Dryas) glaciation in Britain.', Boreas., 47 (1). pp. 202-224. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12259 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2017 The Authors. Boreas published by John Wiley Sons Ltd on behalf of The Boreas Collegium. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk bs_bs_banner Glacial landsystems, retreat dynamics and controls on Loch Lomond Stadial (Younger Dryas) glaciation in Britain HANNAH L.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a LAKE Amongst LOCHS? Peter Mcniven, University of Glasgow the Lake of Menteith Has the Distinction Of
    Varia The Lake of Menteith: Why a LAKE amongst LOCHS? Peter McNiven, University of Glasgow The Lake of Menteith has the distinction of being the onlylake in Scotland. It was not always thus: on James Stobie’s map of the Counties of Perth and Clackmannan, published in 1783, the lake is named Loch of Menteith, while in a letter dated to 1817–19, Sir Walter Scott called it Lough of Menteith (Grierson 1933, 302). Why, then, did this ‘considerable sheet of water’, as the Ordnance Survey described it in 1862–63 (OS1/25/69/43), come to be termed a lake when every other ‘sheet of water’ in the vicinity is designated loch? There are a number of theories given for this unique state of affairs including a popularly held notion that it is a lake because in geographical terms it is different from Scotland’s other stretches of inland fresh water. However, this must be rejected as there are many other examples of Lowland bodies of water that are called lochs, e.g. Linlithgow Loch WLO, Bishop Loch near Glasgow, and Loch Leven KNR. Another theory is that lake here derives from Scots laich ‘stretch of low-lying ground’ (DOST), meaning, in effect, the land surrounding the lake, and a cartographer mistook this Scots word for lake.1 While this theory seems plausible on the face of it, it should also be rejected since there is no evidence that the flat, often boggy area around the lake has ever been called a laich. Until the beginning of the 19th century the Lake of Menteith always had loch in its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Main Issues Report Consultation (Part 1) September 2014
    Responses to Main Issues Report consultation (Part 1) September 2014 POST MAIN ISSUES REPORT DOCUMENT The LIVE Park consultation process The LIVE Park public consultation was held for 11 weeks from 28 April until 14 July 2014. We wanted to encourage as many people as possible to get involved in the process and we welcomed comments and feedback in a variety of ways: • Through our website either as quick comments or formal consultation responses (Responses to MIR consultation Part 1) • Through hard copy forms either electronically or via our online system (Responses to MIR consultation Part 1) • At our events focused on working with Young People (‘Youth engagement and input to the Main Issues Report consultation’ - Part 2) • Through comments on our Facebook, Blog and Twitter pages (Part 3) • At community or stakeholder events/meetings (Part 3) What is this Report? This report (Part 1) includes all the comments submitted during the LIVE Park consultation process as formal responses (attributable) or ‘quick’ comments (non attributable) via the ourlivepark.com. It also includes those received via our website (including our online system – OLDP), by email or posted to us as a hard copy. As verbatim comments, these are shown word-for-word. To make it easier to analyse we’ve been through every comment and categorised them so what you’ll see presented in this report is organised by the relevant section of the Main Issues Report (e.g. by theme, such as housing or rural economy, or by area). We received approximately 653 comments to our consultation so this document is lengthy and it’s advisable to be read online along with the actual Main Issues Report document which can be found on www.ourlivepark.com by clicking on ‘Downloads’ then on ‘Full Main Issues Report’.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonefield Port of Menteith Stirling Stirlingshire Fk8 3Rd
    STONEFIELD PORT OF MENTEITH STIRLING STIRLINGSHIRE FK8 3RD OFFERS OVER £400,000 ENERGY PERFORMANCE RATING: E Stonefield is situated in rural Stirlingshire to the east of Aberfoyle, close to the Lake of Menteith. The area was established as a burgh of barony, then named simply Port of Menteith, in 1457 by King James III of Scotland. 15 miles from Stirling, 30 miles from Glasgow and just over 50 miles from central Edinburgh, Stonefield Cottage offers a superb rural location, yet for the commuter is within easy reach of most areas of commerce within central Scotland. In the summer months a ferry runs from Port of Menteith to the island of Inchmahome, site of the Historic Scotland- maintained Inchmahome Priory. The village is home to a fishing club and is the starting point for anglers on the Lake of Menteith. Nick Nairn’s cookery school is based at Loch End, just south of Port of Menteith at the south-east corner of the Lake. In the winter months if the lake freezes over, the Grand Match or Bonspiel is held drawing curlers from all over the world. Stonefield is a charming detached traditional stone-built cottage, with a white washed render under a slate roof. The property is accessed from a private road, shared with one other property. This is a rare opportunity to purchase a unique property, which enjoys an elevated position with wonderful views over the surrounding landscape, in a most peaceful and private setting. The garden grounds are extensive and include a walled garden, home to a mature orchard.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparent Burnet Surveys on the Argyll Mainland
    On the Spot Glasgow and South West Scotland Branch Newsletter April 2017 Small Pearl-bordered Fritillary. Bill Higgins Contents Welcome to On the Spot 2016………………………..………………3 Branch AGM Notice…………………………………………………...4-5 2016 Events…………………………………………………………….6-7 Saving Our Beautiful Snout……………………………………..…....8-9 Peatland Projects……………………………………………………..10-11 Butterfly Records Summary for 2016 .……………………………..12-14 Orange-tip postcard survey…………………………………………..15 Glasgow & South-west Butterfly Conservation……………..……..16 Urban Butterfly Project Update……………………………...……....17 Branch Photographic Competition...………………………………...18-19 Forester Survey Results 2016 and Survey Plans for 2017 ..……..20-21 Transparent Burnet Surveys on the Argyll Mainland ……………...22-24 Two moths or not two moths: A play on Shakespeare! …...……...25 Transparent Burnet Surveys on the Argyll Mainland ……………...26-31 Glasgow and SW Branch Committee ………………………………..32 Newsletter edited by Anthony McCluskey Butterfly Conservation Scotland Head Office Balallan House, Allan Park, Stirling, FK8 2QG Tel: 01786 447753. Email [email protected] Butterfly Conservation Head office and Membership Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP Tel: 0870 7744309. Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.butterfly-conservation.org This magazine is published by the Glasgow & South West Scotland branch of Butterfly Conservation. Copyright © 2017. All Rights Reserved. All photographic images and text remain the copyright of the original creators as indicated. Views expressed by contributors are not necessarily those of the editors or of Butterfly Conservation either locally or nationally. The editor would welcome written and/or artwork contributions on all aspects of butterflies and moths in south west Scotland or further afield. Contributions for the next newsletter should be sent to the Newsletter Editor (contact details at back).
    [Show full text]
  • The Campbells Are Coming! a 16Th-Century Experience
    The Campbells are coming! A 16th-century experience. [A Campbell push into the Lennox and Menteith] An earlier version was delivered to Drymen and District Local History Society on 22 November 2007 Let us start with a sense of how 16th-century Scots looked at their own country by examining the map of the whole kingdom produced by Abraham Ortelius in 1574. It has west at the top rather than north and although it has got the rough shape of the country right, to our eyes and geographical knowledge there are lots of things wrong with it. As the closer view of the central strip of Scotland shows the internal geography of Scotland can seem very askew. It does show that for Scots in the early modern period the central strip of Scotland was not the same as today's Central Belt. A further zoom in shows the importance given to Loch Lomond which is a major feature and one associated with Loch Tay. In 16th-century Scotland, Stirling was central in many senses of the term. While Drymen was not shown in the close-up of the district, the parish, and in this case probably the castle, of Kilmoronock, held by the Cunninghams of Drumquhassill, were one of the relatively few local places noted on this map of all Scotland. At the end of the century, Timothy Pont changed Scottish map-making. During the 1590s he put on his walking boots and took his satchel and walked through Scotland making his surveys. Many of his sketches survive and are housed in the National Library of Scotland and are available for viewing on their website.
    [Show full text]