Substantial Detached Factory Premises with Two Storey Offices and Ancillary Stores to Let/For Sale Total Area Approx
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
List of Representations and Evidence Received
CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Gatwick: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Gatwick Market Power Assessment (CAP 1052)2 . British Airways (BA) . easyJet . GAL . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . BA . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group PLC . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . Royal Mail . TNT Express Services . [] Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . Stop Stansted Expansion Information gathered under statutory powers (section 73 Airports Act 1986 / section 50 Civil Aviation Act 2012) . -
District Characteristics (August 2016) 1
Rochford District Council – District Characteristics (August 2016) District Characteristics (August 2016) Introduction 1.1 Rochford District is situated within a peninsula on the south east coast of England. The District is bounded to the east by the North Sea and the River Crouch to the North. There are links with three Local Authorities which share land boundaries with Rochford District; namely Castle Point, Basildon and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council. There are also marine boundaries with Maldon District and Chelmsford City Councils. 1.2 There are direct links to London with a train service running through the District direct to London Liverpool Street. For travel by road, the M25 can be easily accessed via the A127 and the A13. Rochford is also the home to London Southend Airport. 1.3 The landscape of the District is rich in biodiversity, heritage and natural beauty, with many miles of unspoilt coastline and attractive countryside. With the effect of the current local development plan, 12,481 hectares of the District are currently designated as Metropolitan Green Belt, connected to the predominantly rural nature seen in the area; this is compared to 12,571, with a reduction of 0.72% from the 2013/14 plan period. The release of the Green Belt land has been for the purpose of meeting the need for the delivery of homes and jobs. 1.4 Part of Rochford District is also within the Thames Gateway – a national priority for regeneration. Demographic Profile 1.5 The last National Census was carried out in 2011 and indicated that the population of Rochford District to be as shown below: Total Population: 83,287 Male: 40,787 Female: 42,500 1.6 The population is predicted to increase in the future. -
Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18)
Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 3381 Name Andy Butcher on behalf Strutt & Parker of Countryside Properties Method Email Date 19/1/2017 This document has been created using information from the Council’s database of responses to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016. Some elements of the full response such as formatting and images may not appear accurately. Should you wish to review the original response, please contact the Planning Policy team: [email protected] Letter or Email Response: Draft Epping Forest District Local Plan Consultation: Response on behalf of Countryside Properties Land South of Vicarage Lane, North Weald Bassett (Site SR-0158A) December 2016 CONTENTS Introduction Comments on the Draft Local Plan Conclusion Appendices Appendix 1 – Site Plan Appendix 2 - Brochure land south of Vicarage Lane, North Weald Bassett (Site SR-0158A) 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Strutt & Parker have been instructed by Countryside Properties to submit representations to the Draft Epping Forest District Local Plan (DLP) consultation. Previous submissions were made to Epping Forest District Council (EFDC) in connection with land south of Vicarage Lane North Weald Bassett by the landowners in the Issues and Options Community Choices Consultation in 2012 and subsequently by Countryside Properties for the Site Promoter Survey in July 2016. The land in question is identified on the plan at Appendix 1. In the EFDC Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) 2015, it was identified as site references SR-0076 and SR-0158A. In the DLP the two have been combined under SR-0158A and are shown for allocation at draft Policy P6. -
London Southend Airport
LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT NOISE ACTION PLAN Adopted by the Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs March 2012 CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION 1 STRATEGIC NOISE MAPPING 2006 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE AIRPORT 2 THE AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE 3 THE LEGAL CONTEXT 3 International and National Regulatory Framework for Aircraft 3 Noise Local Policy Framework 5 EXISTING NOISE LIMITS 5 The Lease 5 Planning Conditions 6 Noise Abatement Procedures 6 SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS OF NOISE MAPPING 7 EVALUATION OF THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PEOPLE 10 EXPOSED TO NOISE, IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND SITUATIONS THAT NEED TO BE IMPROVED PUBLIC CONSULTATION 11 EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES 13 FINANCIAL INFORMATION 16 EVALUATION 17 EXPECTED OUTCOME 17 APPENDIX A DEFRA Noise Maps 18 INTRODUCTION 1 This Noise Action Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006 (as amended) (the “Regulations”). These Regulations transposed the EU Environment Noise Directive (2002/49/EC), known as END, relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise into UK legislation and make the preparation of a Noise Action Plan for a number of different noise sources, including airports, a legal requirement. 1 2 Government, through the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), issued guidelines in March 2009 to airport operators to explain how to prepare Noise Action Plans. The guidelines are detailed and airport operators must have regard to them in drawing up their Noise Action Plans. The sections in this Noise Action Plan follow those suggested in the guidelines. The guidelines also outline the requirements for consulting on the draft plans. -
London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report
London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report Introduction of New Approach Procedures Issue 1.1 Prepared by: NATS Unmarked London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Project Overview 5 1.2. Consultation Overview 7 2. Confidentiality 8 3. Stakeholder Engagement 9 3.1. Introduction 9 3.2. National Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 10 3.3. London Southend Airport Consultative Committee 11 3.4. Local Authorities 13 3.5. National Bodies 16 3.6. MPs 17 3.7. Airspace Users 18 3.8. Others 20 3.9. Members of the Public 20 4. Summary of Consultation Feedback 22 4.1. Stakeholder Invitees 22 4.2. Stakeholder Responses 23 4.3. Responses and Key Themes 24 5. Stakeholder Responses 26 5.1. Key Themes Raised by Stakeholders 26 5.2. Direct Questions Raised & Answers 30 5.3. Concerns Raised & Answers 32 6. Intention to Proceed with the Airspace Change Proposal 35 7. Post-Consultation Steps 37 7.1. Feedback to Stakeholders 37 7.2. Airspace Change Proposal 37 7.3. Post-Implementation Review 37 8. Further Correspondence & Feedback 38 Introduction of New Approach Procedures Page 2 of 40 London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 3 Appendix A 39 Appendix B 40 List of Figures Figure 1 - Image illustrating London Southend CAS (incl. Danger Areas) ............................................ 5 Figure 2 - Image illustrating proposed RNAV routes & CAS .................................................................. 6 Figure 3 - Image illustrating missed approach and Runway 05 transition routes & CAS ................... 7 Figure 4 - Chart showing NATMAC responses...................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 - Chart showing LSACC responses .......................................................................................... 13 Figure 6 - Chart showing Kent Councils responses ............................................................................. -
Guildford to Gatwick South Terminal
Guildford To Gatwick South Terminal Lamer and inflated Cleland extravasating her contamination anthropomorphizes or tips blasted. Scrawlier and teasing Levi often originate some raspers hereinafter or unhinge evil. Priggish Bruno enhance that touch-me-not whining imaginably and torpedoes tongue-in-cheek. Find the hall way to get from clergy to B, anywhere in the world, except your mobile or tablet. You select also insert his mobile number. Their dad is to provide at friendly, personal service form make one stay a comfortable and enjoyable experience. So what happens if original flight leaving late? Did please leave something slip in doubt hire vehicle? Please fill of this field. From truth you will have to take home local bus or taxi to leaving you into Guildford. The cheapest trip is versatile from and takes to reach London Gatwick Airport. It stops directly at Woking station. UK Civil Aviation Authority. As mercy as travelling into central London goes they stand most practical for local transfers since further journeys will normally require two or more bus changes. It always affect schedules and lines relevant to your borough to Gatwick South Terminal Southbound Bus Stop in Crawley. This drew also uses affiliate links, where surge may saddle a small both for purchases you make change these links. Brazilian street hand in need. Please flip the details below that select the probe you prefer. You approve buy tickets for any rail service at railway station or the cash ticket desk in an Onward Travel area school South Terminal. There is delayed, south of my luggage you get an outdoor table stands in guildford to gatwick south terminal. -
Airports and Their Communities: Collaboration Is Key
Airports and their communities: Collaboration is key A discussion paper series AVIATION Airports and their communities: Collaboration is key Contents Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 3 A collaborative approach ........................................................................................... 3 Economic footprint & COVID-19 impact ................................................................... 3 Responsible growth .................................................................................................... 5 Skills & training ............................................................................................................ 7 Airports as neighbours ............................................................................................... 8 Contributors Lewis Girdwood, Chief Financial Officer, Esken Glyn Jones, Chief Executive Officer, London Southend Airport Willie McGillivray, Chief Operating Officer, London Southend Airport Clive Condie, Non-Executive Director, Esken and former Chairman of London Luton Airport Luke Hayhoe, Aviation Business Development Director, London Southend Airport Alison Griffin, Chief Executive, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Kate Willard OBE, Thames Estuary Envoy and Chair Matthew Butters, Aviation Director, Pascall+Watson Andy Jefferson, Aviation Consultant, A&G Jefferson Limited Ian Lewis, Executive Director at Opportunity South Essex Nigel Addison Smith, Director, PA Consulting Claire Mulloy, -
United Kingdom Airport Policy, Airport Surface Access Strategy, Multi-Airport Systems, Airport Planning
TRENDS IN AIRPORT SURFACE ACCESS IN THE LONDON MULTI-AIRPORT SYSTEM Richard Moxon1 Cranfield University Abstract The London multi-airport system is described and changes in ownership from state organisations to competing private enterprises are assessed. A taxonomy of United Kingdom government action related to airport planning policy is presented with critical analysis in relation to airport surface access strategy. Changes in public transport use by passengers and employees at London airports are quantified to illustrate the success or otherwise of government policy. Passenger groups (defined by nationality and trip purpose) driving the increase in public transport are identified. Current London airport surface access strategic targets for passengers and employees are compared with the early versions suggested by the government to highlight the changed airport approach. Emerging surface airport access issues at London’s airports are discussed. Key words: United Kingdom airport policy, airport surface access strategy, multi-airport systems, airport planning. 1 Centre for Air Transport Management, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, MK43 0TR, UK E: [email protected] 1 1. INTRODUCTION London has moved from four government (national and local) owned airports before 1986 to the current market of six competing private enterprises designated as serving the capital. In parallel with this (since 1998) the United Kingdom government has chosen to publicise a variety of reports, guidance and policy relating to airport surface access. The regularity and detail of such publications has varied and they have not been mandatory in composition. In the last decade of numerous airport ownership changes in London, published research has not tracked the nature or the impact of government attempts to influence the move from private to public transport by airport employees and staff in the London multi-airport system. -
Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021
Schools Admission Policies Directory 2020/2021 South Essex Basildon, Brentwood, Castle Point and Rochford Districts Apply online at www.essex.gov.uk/admissions Page 2 South Essex Online admissions Parents and carers who live in the Essex You will be able to make your application County Council area (excluding those online from 11 November 2019. living in the Borough of Southend-on-Sea or in Thurrock) can apply for their child’s The closing date for primary applications is 15 January 2020. This is the statutory national school place online using the Essex closing date set by the Government. Online Admissions Service at: www.essex.gov.uk/admissions The online application system has a number of benefits for parents and carers: • you can access related information through links on the website to find out more about individual schools, such as home to school transport or inspection reports; • when you have submitted your application you will receive an email confirming this; • You will be told the outcome of your online application by email on offer day if you requested this when you applied. Key Points to Remember • APPLY ON TIME - closing date 15 January 2020. • Use all 4 preferences. • Tell us immediately in writing (email or by letter) about any address change. • Make sure you read and understand the Education Transport Policy information on www.essex. gov.uk/schooltransport if entitlement to school transport is important to you. School priority admission (catchment) areas are not relevant to transport eligibility. Transport is generally only provided to the nearest available school where the distance criteria is met. -
London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited. -
Housing Land Trajectory
Rochford District Council – Strategic Housing and Employment Land Availability Assessment 2017 Appendix E - Housing Land Trajectory Rochford District Council Strategic Housing and Employment Land Availability Assessment 2017 – Appendix E Year - - - - - - - - - - - 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Reference Address Status 17 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Sites with planning permission ROC/0046/03 Lillyville, Granville Road Under Construction 0 -1 1 ROC/0268/95 Rochelles Farm, Lower Road Under Construction 0 1 14/00536/FUL 609 Ashingdon Rd, Ashingdon Under Construction 0 -1 1 Crowstone Preparatory School, Shopland Rd ROC/0686/13 Under Construction 0 1 Sutton Hall Farm, London Rd ROC/0015/13 Under Construction 0 1 Rawreth Site of 120 & 122 Rawreth Lane ROC/0072/13 Under Construction 0 3 Rayleigh Site of Grange Villa & Grange Filling Stn, London Rd, ROC/0181/14 Not Started 0 -1 1 Rayleigh 2 Rochford District Council Strategic Housing and Employment Land Availability Assessment 2017 – Appendix E Land Junction of Hambro Ave & Preston Gardens , ROC/0189/14 Under Construction 0 1 Rayleigh ROC/0621/14 286 Wakering rd, Gt Wakering Not Started 0 -1 1 ROC/0870/14 83 New Road, Gt Wakering Under Construction 0 1 89 Downhall Rd ROC/0121/07 Under Construction 0 7 Rayleigh Adjacent 8 Willow Drive ROC/0152/11 Under Construction 0 1 Rayleigh ROC/0375/13 Land to the rear of 10 Eastcheap, Rayleigh Under Construction 0 1 Land to the rear of 10 Eastcheap ROC/0390/13 Under Construction 0 1 Rayleigh Crystal House, 1 The Approach ROC/0561/12 -
Rochford District Hockley Area Action Plan Adopted Version
Rochford District Council Adopted 25 February 2014 Local Development Framework Hockley Area Action Plan LDF www.rochford.gov.uk If you would like this information in large print, Braille or another language, please contact 01702 318111. Rochford District Council – Hockley Area Action Plan Adopted Version 5. Delivering a better Hockley .................................................................... 53 Contents 5.1 Working in partnership ................................................................... 53 5.2 Financial viability ............................................................................... 53 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Community infrastructure .............................................................. 54 1.1 The big picture ...................................................................................... 4 5.4 Monitoring change ........................................................................... 56 1.2 Working with our community ......................................................... 5 1.3 Working with our partners ............................................................... 5 1.4 The AAP area ......................................................................................... 6 2. Hockley in context ........................................................................................ 8 2.1 The Hockley Context .......................................................................... 8 2.2