Orion Mystery Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orion Mystery Pdf Orion mystery pdf Continue Robert Bauval is an author, lecturer and researcher of Ancient Egypt, best known for his theory of Orion's correlation. Bauval was born in Alexandria, Egipi. He attended Franciscan College in Buckinghamshire, England. He spent most of his engineering career living and working in the Middle East and Africa as a civil engineer. At the end of 1992, Bauval contacted Adrian Gilbert; they went on to write The Mystery of Orion together, which became an international bestseller. He also co-authored three books with Graham Hancock, Breaking The Mirror Of Heaven: Conspiracy to Suppress the Voice of Ancient Egypt with Ahmed Osman and two books with Thomas Brophy, including The African Imhotep: The Architect of Cosmos. Robert Bauval is the famous author of The Secrets of Orion and co-author (with Graham Hancock) of The Mystery of the Sphinx, The Mystery of Mars and the Guardian of Genesis. His contribution to Egyptology and Archaeology was widely recognized. Adrian Gilbert is a best-selling author and co-author of The Orion Mystery, The Mayan Prophecies, Magi: The zuest for a Secret Tradition and The Holy Kingdom. The fringe hypothesis in the alternative Egyptological representation of the central principle of Orion's correlation theory: the outlines of the pyramids of Giza superimposed on the photograph of stars in the Orion belt. The veracity of this match was questioned by Hancock's critics. The Orion Correlation Theory (or the theory of the Ghiza-Orion correlation) is a fringe theory in alternative Egyptology. He argues that there is a correlation between the location of the three largest pyramids of the Giza pyramid complex and the Orion belt of the constellation Orion, and that this correlation was conceived as such by the original builders of the pyramid complex giza. Orion's stars were associated with Osiris, the god of rebirth and the afterlife of the ancient Egyptians. Depending on the theory version, additional pyramids may be included to complete the image of the constellation Orion, and the Nile River may be included in the Milky Way. The theory was first published in 1989 in the journal Discussions in Egyptology, Volume 13. In 1994, he became the subject of the bestselling book The Mystery of Orion, as well as the BBC documentary The Great Pyramid: The Gateway to the Stars (February 1994) and appears in some New Age books. The Orion Story correlation theory was advanced by Robert Bauval and mentioned that Mintaka, the dimmer and the westernmost of the stars, dominated the Orion Belt, was slightly displaced from the others. Bauval then made a connection between the location of the three main stars in the Orion Belt and the location of the three main pyramids in the pyramid complex of Giza. He published this idea in 1989 in the journal Discussions in Egyptology, Volume 13. This idea was further outlined by Bauval in collaboration Adrian Gilbert (The Orion Mystery, 1994) and Graham Hancock (Keeper of Genesis, 1996), as well as in their individual publications. At the heart of this theory, it can be assumed that the relative positions of the three main ancient Egyptian pyramids on the Giza plateau were conceived to the relative positions of the three stars in the constellation Orion, which make up the Orion belt, since these stars appeared in 10,000 BC Their original ideas about aligning the pyramids of Giza with Orion: ... The three pyramids were the earthly map of the three stars of the Orion Belt later joined by speculation about the age of the Great Sphinx. According to these works, the Great Sphinx was built around 10500 BC (Upper Paleolithic), and its lion shape is considered the final reference to the constellation Leo. In addition, the orientation and location of the Sphinx, the pyramids of Giza and the Nile River relative to each other on the ground is aligned as an accurate reflection or map of the constellations of Leo, Orion (in particular, the Orion Belt) and the Milky Way respectively. How Hancock puts it in 1998's Mars Mystery (co-authored with Bauval): ... we demonstrated with a substantial amount of evidence that the picture of the stars that is frozen on earth in Giza in the form of three pyramids and the Sphinx represents the location of the constellations Of Orion and Leo as they looked at the moment of sunrise on the vernal equinox during the astronomical Age of the Lion (i.e., the era in which the Sun was placed by Leo on spring equilibrium.) It is generally calculated that fell between the Gregorian calendar dates 10970 and 8810 BC Allusions on dates about 12,500 years ago are important to Hancock, as this is the era he seeks to appropriate the advanced civilization of the progenitor, which has now disappeared, but which he claims through most of his works existed and whose advanced technology influenced and shaped the development of famous civilizations in the world of antiquity. Egyptology and archaeological sciences claim that the available evidence suggests that the pyramids of Giza were built during the Fourth Dynasty (3rd millennium BC), while the exact date of the Great Sphinx is still unclear. Hancock does not dispute the dating evidence of the current existing pyramids, but instead argues that they may have been the architectural evolution of sites whose origins and cultural significance date back about eight thousand years before the current monuments were built - since the orion correlation theory claims to be oriented in this way - which, implied, provides additional evidence of the impact of astronomical, mathematical and historical knowledge that may not have been conveyed Builders. The critical arguments of Hancock, Bauval, Anthony West and others about the significance of the proposed correlations were described as a form of pseudoarchaeology. They include two astronomers, Ed Krupp of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles and Tony Fairall of the University of Cape Town. Using planetarium equipment, Krupp and Fairall independently explored the angle between the alignment of the Orion Belt and the North in the era referred to by Hancock, Bauval, etc. (which differs from the angle seen today or in the third millennium BC, due to the precession of the equinox). They found that the angle was slightly different from the ideal match, which is believed to exist by Bauwal and Hancock in Orion's correlation theory. They estimate 47-50 degrees per planetarium, compared to the 38-degree angle formed by the pyramids. Krupp noted that the slightly bent line formed by the three pyramids deviated to the north, while a small kink in the Orion belt line deformed to the south, and to fit them, one or the other had to be turned upside down. Indeed, this is what was done in the original book of Bauval and Gilbert (The Mystery of Orion), which compares the images of the pyramids and Orion, without revealing that the map of the pyramids was upside down. Krupp and Fairall find other problems with their arguments, including the fact that if the Sphinx is to represent the constellation Leo, it should be on the opposite side of the Nile (Milky Way) from the pyramids (Orion), that the spring equinox c. 10.500 BC was in vir between the Virgin, not Leo, and that in any case the constellations of the zodiac originated from Mesopotamia and were completely unknown in Egypt until late Greco-Roman. Ed Krupp repeated this statement upside down in the BBC documentary Atlantis Revival (1999). Bauval said some astronomers, including Archie Roy of the University of Glasgow, rejected Krupp's argument. Krupp presented a counterpoint to objections that Bauwal's statement was made by the late Dr. Roy, who was emeritus professor of astronomy at the University of Glasgow (including the accusation that Bauval and Gilbert deliberately inverted the pyramid map). (Clarification needed) (failed check). In a ruling by the Broadcasting Standards Commission (UK), the committee ruled in favour of Robert Bauval that Krupp's claim that the cards had been turned upside down was unfairly presented in the Bbc documentary Atlantis Reborn, without including Bauwal's response. Bauwal and Hancock's responses to Krupp's statements were included in an amended version of the documentary Atlantis Revival Again, shown on December 14, 2000. Leo and the Sphinx The Great Sphinx of The Great Gies it is a colossal statue with the face of a man and the body of a lion. Carved from the surrounding limestone rock, it is 57 meters long, 6 meters wide and 20 meters high, making it the largest single stone statue in the world. The Great Sphinx is one of the largest and oldest statues in the world, but basic facts about it, such as the real model for the face, when and why it was built, and by whom, are discussed. These questions collectively earned the title of The Riddle of the Sphinx, a nod to its Greek namesake. The Great Sphinx is usually taken by Egyptologists as the likeness of King Hafra (also known by the Hellenized version of his name, Chephren), who is often credited as a builder as well. This will accommodate the construction time sometime between 2520 BC and 2494 BC Since limited evidence giving Hafra's origins is ambiguous, the idea of who built the Sphinx, and when, continues to be the subject of discussion. The argument put forward by Bauwal and Hancock in support of orion's theory of correlation is that the construction of the Great Sphinx began in 10500 BC; that the lion shape of the Sphinx is the final reference to the constellation Leo; and that the location and orientation of the Sphinx, the pyramid complex of Giza and the Nile River are an accurate reflection or map of the constellations of Leo, Orion (in particular, the Orion Belt) and the Milky Way, respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Health & Science University School Of
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE APPLICATION OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TOOLS TO THE STUDY OF BIOREMEDIATION IN CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS By Christina N. Brow A DISSERTATION Presented to the Division of Environmental & Biomolecular Systems and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2011 I DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RIOMOLECI JLAR SYSTEMS INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL I-II'AI,TH OREGON HEALTI-I & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY CEIITTFICA'T'E OF AI'PTIOVAL --- --.----.-.----...-. - -- ..... .. This is to ccitifL Illat thc Pl3.D. dissc~tatioi~of . Christina N. RI-c~w has bccli appr-ovccl - -- - - -36 -- -------- Dl-. HOIGM. Sjnio~i,Assistant i'mfcssc~r Reseal-cli Co-Ad visor --. ..- --,-.- -.*-- -t-.- s. Richar i . .1 I~nson,P~.oli.ssos ---r~TdResearch Co-Advisor - --- v----- Dr. Paul G. Tralriyck, Professor ----.. w..3- -- .- -.--- , , Dl-. ewis Sc~~~psi~ii.cgor atc linivcr-sity -3 ExternalE-xamine~- - Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................................III ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................IV 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 55,500 BCE and the 23 Stars of Giza I Douglas 2019
    55,500 BCE and the 23 Stars of Giza I Douglas 2019 55,500 BCE and the 23 Stars of Giza Ian Douglas, B.Sc [email protected] 3 December 2019 Version 1.1.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3263927 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Please check via DOI for latest version on Zenodo, where there is proper version control. Abstract This is a companion paper to and reliant on “Diskerfery and the Alignment of the Four Main Giza Pyramids” (Douglas, 2019 [1]). Following the geometric alignments shown in that paper, we now present the astronomical design plan with 23 stars. There is a perfect alignment with two stars, very close alignment with others, and close alignment with other prominent stars in the area. We propose that this was done to provide a date for the construction of Giza. The alignment occurs at circa 55,500BCE. Keywords: Giza, pyramids, alignment, archaeoastronomy. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology, notation and accuracy 3. Overview of existing stellar explanations 4. The Quadruple Points 5. The Big Dipper hint 6. The stellar alignment 7. Rounds 2 and 3 8. Comparative chronology 9. Discussion 1 55,500 BCE and the 23 Stars of Giza I Douglas 2019 10. Acknowledgements 11. Bibliography Changes: 1.0.2 22 July 2019: Added date from Scott Creighton [2]. 1.04 Aug/Sep: round 3, comment about Khafre 3-4-5 design. Added dates from and comments about The Treatise on the Egyptian Pyramids. Not published. 1.1.0 November/December 2019: Major update.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomie: Concept, Theory, Research Promise
    Anomie: Concept, Theory, Research Promise Max Coleman Oberlin College Sociology Department Senior Honors Thesis April 2014 Table of Contents Dedication and Acknowledgements 3 Abstract 4 I. What Is Anomie? Introduction 6 Anomie in The Division of Labor 9 Anomie in Suicide 13 Debate: The Causes of Desire 23 A Sidenote on Dualism and Neuroplasticity 27 Merton vs. Durkheim 29 Critiques of Anomie Theory 33 Functionalist? 34 Totalitarian? 38 Subjective? 44 Teleological? 50 Positivist? 54 Inconsistent? 59 Methodologically Unsound? 61 Sexist? 68 Overly Biological? 71 Identical to Egoism? 73 In Conclusion 78 The Decline of Anomie Theory 79 II. Why Anomie Still Matters The Anomic Nation 90 Anomie in American History 90 Anomie in Contemporary American Society 102 Mental Health 120 Anxiety 126 Conclusions 129 Soldier Suicide 131 School Shootings 135 III. Looking Forward: The Solution to Anomie 142 Sociology as a Guiding Force 142 Gemeinschaft Within Gesellschaft 145 The Religion of Humanity 151 Final Thoughts 155 Bibliography 158 2 To those who suffer in silence from the pain they cannot reveal. Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Professor Vejlko Vujačić for his unwavering support, and for sharing with me his incomparable sociological imagination. If I succeed as a professor of sociology, it will be because of him. I am also deeply indebted to Émile Durkheim, who first exposed the anomic crisis, and without whom no one would be writing a sociology thesis. 3 Abstract: The term anomie has declined in the sociology literature. Apart from brief mentions, it has not featured in the American Sociological Review for sixteen years. Moreover, the term has narrowed and is now used almost exclusively to discuss deviance.
    [Show full text]
  • Schrodinger's Cat Pseudoscience and Fringe Theories Sgm, 2018/DEC/01
    Schrodinger's Cat Pseudoscience and Fringe Theories sgm, 2018/DEC/01 from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger %27s_cat “Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method. [1][Note 1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and absence of systematic practices when developing theories, and continued adherence long after they have been experimentally discredited. The term pseudoscience is considered pejorative[4] because it suggests something is being presented as science inaccurately or even deceptively. Those described as practicing or advocating pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.[2]” from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience “Fringe theories include any new area of scientific endeavor in the process of becoming established and some proposed theories. It can include speculative sciences. This includes physics fields and physical theories presented in accordance with known evidence, and a body of associated predictions have been made according to that theory. Some fringe theories go on to become a widely accepted part of physics. Other fringe theories end up being disproven. Some fringe theories are a form of protoscience and others are a form of pseudoscience. The falsification of the original theory sometimes leads to reformulation of the theory.” from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theoretical_physics#Fringe_th eories “The scientific method is an empirical method of knowledge acquisition which has characterized the development of science since at least the 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeptical Inquirer the Condon UFO Study
    the Skeptical Inquirer The Condon UFO Study Remote viewing Unmasked Flew on Parapsychology Sebeok on Animal Language Shneour on Occam's Razor VOL. X NO. 4 / SUMMER 1986 $5.00 Published by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Skeptical Inquirer THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. Klass, Paul Kurtz, James Randi. Consulting Editors Isaac Asimov, William Sims Bainbridge, John Boardman, John R. Cole, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Public Relations Andrea Szalanski (director), Barry Karr. Production Editor Betsy Offermann. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Systems Programmer Richard Seymour, Data-Base Manager Laurel Geise Smith. Typesetting Paul E. Loynes. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Staff Beth Gehrman, Ruthann Page, Alfreda Pidgeon, Laurie Van Amburgh. Cartoonist Rob Pudim. The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; philosopher. State University of New York at Buffalo. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock, psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Eduardo Amaldi, physicist. University of Rome, Italy. Isaac Asimov, biochemist, author; Irving Biederman, psychologist, SUNY at Buffalo; Brand Blanshard, philosopher, Yale; Mario Bunge, philosopher, McGill University; Bette Chambers, A.H.A.; John R. Cole, anthropologist. Institute for the Study of Human Issues; F. H. C. Crick, biophysicist, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, Calif; L. Sprague de Camp, author, engineer; Bernard Dixon, science writer, consultant; Paul Edwards, philos­ opher.
    [Show full text]
  • TESTING 'THE GIRL with X-RAY EYES' Tsunami Conspiracies and Hollow Moons
    TAVRIS ON SEX DIFFERENCES • RANDI ON JOHNNY CARSON • NICKELL ON TURIN SHROUD Skeptical Inquirer THE MAGAZINE FOR SCIENCE A N D R EASON Volume 29, No. 3 • May / June 200 » Testing **, 'The Girl with X-Ray Eyes' •\ •Ray Hyman. Andrew Skolnick Joe Nickell Psychic Swindlers ^H --.T.'.-V*• • Four Myths about Evolution A Librarian's Guide to Critical Thinking Published by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION of Claims off the Paranormal AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-TRANSNATIONAL (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO| • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nicked, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman. Research Fellow Lee Nisbet. Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock.* psychologist. York Univ., Toronto Saul Green, Ph.D., biochemist, president of ZOL Loren Pankratz. psychologist. Oregon Health jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, Oregon Consultants, New York. NY Sciences Univ. Marcia Angell. M.D., former editor-in-chief. New Susan Haack. Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts Robert L Park, professor of physics, Univ. of Maryland England Journal of Medicine and Sciences, prof, of philosophy, University John Paulos, mathematician. Temple Univ. Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky of Miami Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist. Harvard Stephen Barrett. M.D., psychiatrist, author. C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, consumer advocate. Allentown, Pa. David J. Helfand. professor of astronomy, executive director CICAP Italy Willem Betz.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy in Practice
    Philosophy in Practice VOLUME 8 – SPRING 2014 Cover Art: by Letizia Ragusa, “Untitled” © Copyright 2014 by CSULA Philosophy Department. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Individual copyright reverts to the authors upon further publication of their articles. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ..................................v Faculty ...........................................vi Professor Spotlight: Sheila Price ......................viii Articles: Troubles for a New Dispositional Account of Belief Nathaniel Greeley ........................... 1 Preserving Realism in the Philosophy of Science Alysha Kassam ............................ 21 Deflating Deflationary Meta-Ontology Nicole Lavoie ............................. 36 The Normative Critique of Law’s Claim to Authority: A Bad Concept of Law Pedro Viramontes, Jr. ........................ 48 Reasons and Normativity Mark Gaynor ............................. 64 Phenomenology and Time: Husserl, Derrida, Zahavi Jared Gee ................................ 77 Why There Still May Be Such a Thing as Time-Travel Samuel Batzdorff ............................91 Reconsidering Two Notions of Analyticity Neil Sanchez . .104 The Incompatibility of Compositional Nihilism and Direct Reference Theory Lena Becerra ..............................120
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design and the First Amendment: a Response
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2006 Intelligent Design and the First Amendment: A Response Jay Wexler Boston Univeristy School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Jay Wexler, Intelligent Design and the First Amendment: A Response, 84 Washington University Law Quarterly 63 (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/692 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW WORKING PAPER SERIES, PUBLIC LAW & LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 05-16 INTELLIGENT DESIGN AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: A RESPONSE JAY D. WEXLER This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Boston University School of Law Working Paper Series Index: http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/papers The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=815604 Forthcoming in the Washington University Law Quarterly Intelligent Design and the First Amendment: A Response Jay D. Wexler* Although the struggle over teaching evolution in the public schools has never been far from the front pages of the nation’s newspapers
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Student Packet
    Module #6: Attachment Student Packet 1 Page Table of Contents Page Overview of Module . 3 Learning Objectives. 3 Pre-Module Assignments. 4 Agenda . 15 Reading List . 16 Handouts . 17 2 Page Overview This module provides students with an understanding of trauma and attachment as they impact adopted children and their families. Students learn the processes of healthy and insecure attachment and the role of attunement in attachment. Through didactic presentations and experiential learning, students develop an understanding of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy as one approach to working clinically on attachment issues and they begin to develop clinical skills in utilizing this attachment-focused psychotherapy with adopted children and youth and their adoptive families. This Module provides students with opportunities to assess their readiness to do trauma-focused work with children, youth and families. Learning Objectives: Students will be able to: 1. Define “intersubjectivity” and describe the relationship between intersubjectivity and attachment. 2. Describe five components of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy (DDP) that are common to the empirically based psychotherapies and the four elements that comprise “PACE”. 3. Demonstrate the ability to find something to like in an adoptive parent even when the parent’s behavior in relation to the child is negative. 4. Give at least two examples of how a parent’s attachment history may impact his/her parenting of his/her adopted child. 5. Describe the role of adoptive parents in attachment-focused psychotherapy and two ways to prepare adoptive parents for the sessions with their child. 6. Identify at least three skills that the therapist uses in assessing the child in initial sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Anth 255: Atlantis, Aliens, and Archaeology
    ANTHROPOLOGY 255 WINTER 2021 ANTH 255: ATLANTIS, ALIENS, AND ARCHAEOLOGY Lecture: Monday/Wednesday TIME: 10:15-11:45am Labs: Thursdays at 10:15, 12:30, 2, 3:30 Meets on Synchronously on Zoom Image: Pyramid Takeoff by Meewtoo Instructor: Dr. Alison Carter GE: Tiyas Bhattacharyya Call me: Dr. Carter Call me: Tiyas (Tea-yahs) Pronouns: She/her/hers Pronouns: She/her/hers Office Hours: Mon/Wed 4-5pm or by appt. Office hours: Tuesday 3:30-4:30/Wed 3-4pm Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION There is a lot about the human past we don’t know, but does that mean aliens did it? Archaeology is the scientific study of human history and prehistory through material culture. Pseudoarchaeology misuses science, logic, and the archaeological record to create a misrepresentation or misinterpretation of the past. While some of these claims can capture the imagination or be entertaining, they can also perpetuate conspiracy theories, racist or nationalist beliefs, and misunderstandings of ancient cultures. In this class we will explore a variety of pseudoarchaeological case studies, including Atlantis and ancient aliens theories, in order to critically evaluate them. We’ll consider why some people are attracted to these theories, how they originated, and the “evidence” used to support them. In the process, we’ll also learn what proper archaeological research looks like. Students will learn valuable critical thinking and information literacy skills, while also learning how archaeologists think and what constitutes good archaeological research. 1 ANTHROPOLOGY 255 WINTER 2021 Required Textbook WHAT I WANT YOU TO GET OUT OF Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Innovative Dating in Recent Studies of Ancient Civilization
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 47 Number 47 Fall 2002 Article 8 10-1-2002 An Assessment of Innovative Dating in Recent Studies of Ancient Civilization Rosco C. Hinkle Wright State University (Emeritus) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Hinkle, Rosco C. (2002) "An Assessment of Innovative Dating in Recent Studies of Ancient Civilization," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 47 : No. 47 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol47/iss47/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Hinkle: An Assessment of Innovative Dating in Recent Studies of Ancient C 92 Comparative Civilizations Review No. 47 AN ASSESSMENT OF INNOVATIVE DATING IN RECENT STUDIES OF ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS ROSCOE C. HINKLE, PROFESSOR EMERITUS WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY, OHIO In the modern world, organized knowledge has become increasing- ly differentiated and specialized. Many, perhaps most, domains of knowledge are the focus of one explicit and defined discipline or sci- ence, whereas others (possibly fewer) are pursued by two or more. Certainly, the study of civilizations falls within the second type; i.e., it is surely multi-disciplinary. Many but not all of its representatives are in academia. As in other domains of knowledge, some are unattached (unaffiliated, free, independent), and a few even defined as marginal.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Released New Books July 2012 All Titles, All Languages
    ABCD springer.com Just Released New Books July 2012 All Titles, All Languages “Sorted by author and title within the main subject” springer.com Arts 2 A. Flüchter, Karl Jaspers Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; S. Richter, M. Herren, University of Heidelberg, Germany; M. Rüesch, Karl Arts Karl Jaspers Centre, Heidelberg, Germany (Eds.) Jaspers Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; C. Sibille, Karl Jaspers Centre, Heidelberg, Germany Structures on the Move J. Válek, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, ARCHISS, Transcultural History Prague, Czech Republic; J.J. Hughes, University of the West Technologies of Governance in Transcultural Encounter of Scotland, Paisley, Scotland, UK; C.J.W.P. Groot, Technical Theories, Methods, Sources Universtity Delft, The Netherlands (Eds.) This book enters new territory by moving toward a new conceptual framework for comparative For the 21st century, the often-quoted citation ‘past Historic Mortars and interdisciplinary research on transcultural state is prologue’ reads the other way around: The global formation. Once more, statehood and governance present lacks a historical narrative for the global Characterisation, Assessment and Repair are highly discussed topics, whereby modern state past. Focussing on a transcultural history, this book building is often considered to be a genuinely questions the territoriality of historical concepts and This volume focuses on research and practical issues European characteristic, despite the fact that early offers a narrative, which aims to overcome cultural connected with mortars on historic structures. The modern Europeans knew of, experienced and essentialism by focussing on crossing borders of all book is divided into four sections: Characterisation grappled with highly developed states in Asia. The kinds.
    [Show full text]