DOCSLIB.ORG

Access to Open Content Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access to Open Content Survey Access to Open Content Survey Introduction Thank you for agreeing to participate in our survey about access to open content. This survey should take about 20 - 30 minutes to complete. The survey link cannot be shared so if multiple people are required to complete the survey, it is recommended to gather all their feedback before beginning the survey. Please download the PDF-document of the full survey and explanations of the open content activity categories and be sure to have it handy while filling out the survey. The survey will focus on your library’s efforts and ambitions to support access to open content. It contains the following 5 sections with a total of 23 questions: 1) About your library; 2) About your library’s activities supporting access to open content; 3) Making your open content efforts explicit; 4) Accelerating success and the role of OCLC; 5) About you. While taking the survey, please use only the Continue and Back buttons at the bottom of each page. Please do not use your browser's Forward and Back buttons as these might result in the loss of your survey answers. If you are using Google Chrome, you may experience difficulties in using the Back buttons. To avoid difficulties, we recommend using another browser to complete this survey. Definitions Open content For the purposes of this survey, we define “open content” broadly as the full range of freely available, unrestricted, online content (including OA-scientific articles and e-books, pre-prints, open textbooks and other educational resources, conference proceedings, governmental and non-governmental publications, grey literature, open datasets, digitized heritage collections, freely available web content, YouTube videos, news websites, etc.). Open content activities We define “open content activities” as the full range of library policies, activities and services devoted to this type of content (including the publication and management of open content, making digitized collections available online, selecting and indexing open content not managed by the library, making open content discoverable and usable, preserving open content for long-term access, etc.). 1 Section 1: About Your Library 1. In what country is your library located? [alphabetical dropdown list of countries] 2. *Which of the following best describes your type of library? 1. Education: university / higher education 2. Education: community college / technical school 3. Education: school (K-12) 4. Education: other 5. Consortia 6. Research 7. Government (federal, state, local; all but national libraries) 8. National 9. Public 10. Museum/Archive/Cultural Heritage 11. Special (corporate, law, medical, other) 12. Other (please specify): [If Q2=1-4 ask Q3; otherwise ask Q4] 3. Which of the following best describes the number of full-time students (FTE) that your institution has? • Less than 1,000 • 1,001 to 5,000 • 5,001 to 10,000 • 10,001 to 20,000 • More than 20,000 [Skip to Q5] 4. Which of the following best describes the size of the population your library serves? • Less than 1,000 • 1,001 to 5,000 • 5,001 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • 25,001 to 50,000 • 50,001 to 100,000 • 100,001 to 300,000 • 300,001 to 500,000 • 500,001 to 1,000,000 • Over 1,000,000 5. How many titles do you estimate are in your library’s collection? • Under 500,000 • 500,000-1M • 1M-4M • Over 4M 2 Section 2: About your library’s open content activities The following questions are to gauge which open activities your library is currently carrying out; plan to be carried out; and those your library has offered but has decided to stop. Please be sure to reference the explanations of the open content activity categories as you are completing this section. Refer to page 9 of this document for the complete explanations. 6. In which, if any, of the following open content activities is your library currently involved? (Select all that apply.) Producing open content • Advocacy and policies 1 • Publishing 2 • Digitizing collections 3 • Data services 4 • Supporting authors/researchers/teachers 5 • Bibliometrics 6 Making open content discoverable and usable • Supporting users/instructing/digital literacy programs 7 • Selecting open content not managed by the library 8 • Promoting the discovery of open content 9 • Deep interactions with open content 10 • Assessment 11 Collecting and managing open content • Institutional repository 12 • Digital Collections Library 13 • Born-digital (legal) deposit/Web-archive 14 Not sure None, we are currently not involved in open content activities 7. In which, if any, of the following open content activities is your library planning to become involved? (Select all that apply.) • LIST ONLY THOSE NOT SELECTED IN Q6 • Not sure • None, we are not planning to be involved in open content activities IF Q6 AND Q7 ARE NONE: Follow-up with: You indicated your library is not currently nor planning to be involved in open content activities. Why is that? 3 8. In which, if any, of the following open content activities has your library decided to stop its involvement? (Select all that apply.) • LIST ONLY THOSE NOT SELECTED IN Q6 OR Q7 • Not sure • None, we have not stopped any open content activities IF ANY STOPPED ACTIVITIES: Follow-up with: You indicated your library has stopped some open content activities. Why is that? (Please make sure to note which specific activity you are referring to if there was more than one you decided to stop.) IF NONE OR NOT SURE TO Q6, Q7-Q8, SKIP TO SECTION 5 9. Please indicate for how many years you have been involved in each of your current open content activities. More than 3 1 – 3 Less than Not Your current open content activities years years 1 year sure PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 10. How successful are your current open content activities (based on your measurements)? Neither Successful Your current open Very Somewhat nor Somewhat Very Not content activities Successful Successful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful Unsuccessful measured PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 4 Section 3: Making your open content efforts explicit 11. In planning for expenses/investment, please indicate if the source of investment for each of your current open access activities is a budget line item, full-time equivalent (FTE) allocation and/or project-specific funding. (Select all that apply.) Don’t Your current open Budget FTE Project No source of know/Not content activities line item allocation Money Other* investment sure PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 * If you indicated other, please specify here: 12. Thinking about your library’s total budget expenditures (e.g. staff, hardware/software, acquisitions budgets, project costs covered by grants, etc.), what is the percentage spent on current open content per activity category? (If entering decimals, please use the decimal point format (e.g., .5 or 1.5, etc.)) Percentage of total budget Your current open content activities spent on open content PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 number number number If you are unable to specify by category, can you give an approximate percentage of total expenditure for open content? number 13. Please explain problems or insights, if any, you encountered trying to answer the two previous questions about your library’s investments and expenditures spent on open content. Has trying to make your investment in open content activities more explicit been a useful exercise to you? Why or why not? 5 Section 4: Accelerating success and the role of OCLC 14. For which of the current and planned open content activities would you like to accelerate the impact? Want to Comfortable with Your current and planned open content activities accelerate impact the pace PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 AND Q7 15. For each of your current and planned open content activities, what do you think is the right scale to achieve impact? Local scale (campus; National / Trans- Your current and planned Institutional local Consortial regional national Global open content activities scale community) scale scale scale scale PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 AND Q7 16. For each of your current or planned open content activities, please indicate how you perceive OCLC’s role in supporting your library’s efforts? I do not see a role I see a role for OCLC for OCLC to Your current and planned open OCLC supports my to support my support my content activities library’s efforts library’s efforts library’s efforts PIPE IN RESPONSES FROM Q6 AND Q7 6 17. Which of the following OCLC research areas are most relevant to your open content activities? (Select top 3 options) • Research Information Management (RIM) / Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) • Research Data Management (RDM) • Special Collections and Archives • Optimizing Resource Sharing • User behavior studies • Impact assessment • Standardization of metadata (e.g., Designating Open Access Information in the MARC Formats; IIIF; etc.) • Linked Data • Discoverability of open content • Wikimedia and libraries • Other (please specify) 18. Please identify organizations, coalitions, or associations in your region that support open content or Open Access and that you think OCLC should be engaging with to help achieve impact. 19. Please provide any final thoughts you’d like to share with OCLC regarding open content. 7 Section 5: About you Thinking about those who participated in completing the survey, please answer the following questions. 20. Lead contributor’s level of responsibility: • Administrator (Director) • Assistant Administrator (Assistant Director) • Unit Manager/Unit Head • Librarian/Library Staff • Other (Please specify) 21. Area(s) of responsibility of lead contributor: (Select all that apply.) • Overall responsible (Director level) • Acquisitions • Assessment • Archives/Special Collections • Cataloging/Technical Services • Collection Development/Selection • E-resources • Information Technology/Systems • Interlibrary Loan • Public/Reference Services • Other (Please specify) 22. Did others contribute to this survey? • Yes (Go to Q23) • No 23.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worldcat Data Licensing
    WorldCat Data Licensing 1. Why is OCLC recommending an open data license for its members? Many libraries are now examining ways that they can make their bibliographic records available for free on the Internet so that they can be reused and more fully integrated into the broader Web environment. Libraries may want to release catalog data as linked data, as MARC21 or as MARCXML. For an OCLC® member institution, these records may often contain data derived from WorldCat®. Coupled with a reference to the community norms articulated in WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative, the Open Data Commons Attribution (ODC-BY) license provides a good way to share records that is consistent with the cooperative nature of OCLC cataloging. Best practices in the Web environment include making data available along with a license that clearly sets out the terms under which the data is being made available. Without such a license, users can never be sure of their rights to use the data, which can impede innovation. The VIAF project and the addition of Schema.org linked data to WorldCat.org records were both made available under the ODC-BY license. After much research and discussion, it was clear that ODC-BY was the best choice of license for many OCLC data services. The recommendation for members to also adopt this clear and consistent approach to the open licensing of shared data, derived from WorldCat, flowed from this experience. An OCLC staff group, aided by an external open-data licensing expert, conducted a structured investigation of available licensing alternatives to provide OCLC member institutions with guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Mate Choice from Avicenna's Perspective
    Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online) Vol.26, 2014 Mate choice from Avicenna’s perspective 1 2 3 Masoud Raei , Maryam sadat fatemi Hassanabadi * , Hossein Mansoori 1. Assistant Professor Faculty of law and Elahiyat and Maaref Eslami, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran. 2. MA Student. Fundamentals jurisprudence Islamic Law. , Islamic Azad Khorasgan University, Isfahan, Iran. 3. MA in History and Philosophy of Education, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. * E-mail of the corresponding author: hosintaghi@ gmail.com Abstract The aim of the present research was examining mate choice from Avicenna’s perspective. Being done through application of qualitative approach and a descriptive-analytic method as well, this study attempted to analyze and examine Avicenna’s perspective on effects of mate choice and on criteria for selecting an appropriate spouse and its necessities as well as the hurts discussed in this regard. The research results showed that Avicenna has encouraged all people in marriage, since it brings to them economic and social outcomes, peace and sexual satisfaction as well. Avicenna stated some criteria for appropriate mate choice, and in addition to its necessities, he advised us to follow such principles as the obvious marriage occurrence, its stability, wife’s not being common and a suitable age range for marriage. Moreover, he has examined issues and hurts related to mate choice referring to such cases as nature incongruity, marital infidelity, the state of not having any babies and ethical conflict which may happen in mate choice and marriage, suggesting some solutions to such problems.
    [Show full text]
  • OCLC and the Ethics of Librarianship: Using a Critical Lens to Recast a Key Resource
    OCLC and the Ethics of Librarianship: Using a Critical Lens to Recast a Key Resource Maurine McCourry* Introduction Since its founding in 1967, OCLC has been a catalyst for dramatic change in the way that libraries organize and share resources. The organization’s structure has been self-described as a cooperative throughout its his- tory, but its governance has never strictly fit that model. There have always been librarians involved, and it has remained a non-profit organization, but its business model is strongly influenced by the corporate world, and many in the upper echelon of its leadership have come from that realm. As a result, many librarians have questioned OCLC’s role as a partner with libraries in providing access to information. There has been an undercurrent of belief that the organization does not really share the values of the profession, and does not necessarily ascribe to its ethics. This paper will explore the role the ethics of the profession of librarianship have, or should have, in both the governance of OCLC as an organization, and the use of its services by the library community. Using the frame- work of critical librarianship, it will attempt to answer the following questions: 1) What obligation does OCLC have to observe the ethics of librarianship?; 2) Do OCLC’s current practices fit within the guidelines established by the accepted ethics of the profession?; and 3) What are the responsibilities of the library community in ob- serving the ethics of the profession in relation to the services provided by OCLC? OCLC was founded with a mission of service to academic libraries, seeking to save library staff time and money while facilitating cooperative borrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Upload Your File to Worldcat Knowledge Base
    Upload your file to WorldCat knowledge base Use these instructions to upload a third-party file of your holdings to your WorldCat knowledge base (accessed via WorldShare Collection Manager). Make sure you have completed the steps specific to your third-party provider to download your file. See the instructions to export your holdings from your provider. Prepare your file for upload Use the following file name convention for your holdings file, i.e., the word HOLDINGS in all capital letters, underscore, your institution's registry ID number, dot, file extension: HOLDINGS_registry-id.extension Replace registry-id with your library's Registry ID (also called OCLC Institution ID). To locate the Registry ID for your library, visit the WorldCat Registry or locate the module in OCLC Service Configuration. Contact OCLC Support, if you have questions. Note that you should not attempt to change the file format/extension. Rather, it is important that these files were formatted correctly at the time of download from your third-party service. HOLDINGS_registry-id.txt [See note] HOLDINGS_registry-id.xml-marc [See note] Serial Solutions and EBSCO files need to be in .txt format when uploading via the WorldShare interface or via FTP. SFX files must be in .txt format to upload via the WorldShare interface, but in .xml-marc format to upload via FTP. Use the relevant option to upload your file Use one of the options below. Note that the method you use could be dependent on the file format of your downloaded file. Important note: After you upload your file, you need to contact OCLC Support to alert us that a file is available for our review.
    [Show full text]
  • OCLC Developer Network Handbook
    Join the OCLC Developer Network at www.oclc.org/developer. OCLC Just register or Developer log in to join! Network handbook Guide to OCLC Web Services WorldShare Web services WorldCat Basic API WorldCat Search API WorldCat knowledge base API WorldCat Registry APIs OpenURL Gateway WorldCat Identities Identifier Services (xID) QuestionPoint knowledge base Terminology Services Experimental MapFAST Web Service WorldShare Web services Note: the OCLC WorldShare Management Services (WMS) include an array of APIs, listed here as a group. WMS WMS Circulation API offers libraries a shared approach to license management, What it is: A read-only Web service so library staff can circulation and acquisitions to streamline collection generate a pull list for materials. management workflows across all formats, and create new value through cooperative analytics and shared data and What it does: Shows you which materials used need to be practices. There are 5 WorldShare Web services covered here: pulled for patron requests, holds, and digitization. 1. WMS Acquisitions API What you get: Lists of materials to be pulled at a 2. WMS Circulation API particular branch and the basic metadata to be able to retrieve the materials: title, material format, number of pieces, 3. WMS Collection Management API location and call number 4. WMS Vendor Information Center API Base Service URL: https://circ.sd00.worldcat.org/ 5. WMS NCIP Service pulllist/ For all of these services a library must subscribe to the Documentation: http://www.oclc.org/developer/ WorldShare Management Services in order to use it. The services/wms-circulation-api Query protocol is OpenSearch, record formats are XML and JSON (Atom).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Contributions to Worldcat
    Guidelines for Contributions to WorldCat These Guidelines are designed to assist OCLC member institutions in interpreting the Global Council document titled, "WorldCat Principles of Cooperation" and in using the document "WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative." They were endorsed by Global Council at its June 2011 meeting. 1. "Member libraries make a commitment to contribute to OCLC all current metadata and holdings information, which represents items in their collections." Many libraries question what this means to them. Most do not hesitate to add metadata and holdings for their physical collections held in their buildings, but question whether metadata for other types of materials, including e-resources, ought to be included. Below are some examples to help in deciding when to add or not to add metadata and holdings information to WorldCat. Member libraries are encouraged to add the following to WorldCat: • Physical collections If the materials are part of your permanent collection, and appear in your catalog, the metadata and holdings should appear in WorldCat. The item does not have to be classified in order to qualify for inclusion in WorldCat; many libraries only assign accession numbers to some kinds of materials but still catalog them and consider them part of their permanent collection. • E-Resources Metadata and holdings for e-books, e-journals and other electronic resources (such as Web sites) should be included in WorldCat. The availability of metadata and holdings can facilitate linking users with content through services such as the WorldCat knowledge base. Such inclusion does not necessarily indicate the ability to loan these materials or use them to fill interlibrary loan requests, as many license agreements do not allow such use.
    [Show full text]
  • Linked Data Initiatives at OCLC
    Linked Data initiatives at OCLC DR. AXEL KASCHTE STRATEGY DIRECTOR, OCLC EMEA Status of Linked Data initiatives within OCLC and where we hope to be in the near future ... OCLC Linked Data Research There are quite many original OCLC research papers. changing resource description workflows “We believe that linked data will become the de-facto standard for describing things on the internet, including bibliographic objects.” Wait, but why? Why Linked Data? A better user experience Better outcomes Greater web visibility Connect library resources with other domains New functionality More ways for discovery of library resources Replicate existing library functions more efficiently Cleaner data Improve data integration across domains and regions Improve internal data management & quality Clarify context vs. inventory control https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Documents_on_repository_shelving_at_The_National_Archives.jpg Problem statement The library community’s foundational bibliographic standard is no longer sufficient to take advantage of the tremendous opportunities offered by the web. Areas of inquiry • Searching across a wide pool of described ‘things’ (entities) • Improving display of connections and context • Improving connectivity of inbound data Building a ”context layer” https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Big_Trinity_Lake.jpg Aspirations: IFLA - LRM work place person event organization concept What have we done? Linked Data of OCLC ISNI 10-50 million triples Works Persons 5 billion triples 500 million triples VIAF
    [Show full text]
  • NCO History Brief
    NCO History Brief Band Of Brothers By MSG Matthew Barnes Good morning SGM Spade and fellow classmates of R05, I am MSG Barnes and over the course of the next several minutes I will be giving you an unclassified information brief on E. Company 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, or perhaps better known as the Band of Brothers. The purpose of this brief is to give you a better insight on what these courageous men accomplished from the time they were formed as a unit through the end of WW II. I will talk about when they were formed, the type of Soldiers these men were, their campaign in Europe, and talk about several of the Noncommissioned Officers that led this company. The book, Band of Brothers, by Stephen A. Ambrose was turned into a 10 part miniseries by HBO and directed by Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks. This miniseries documents the formation of Easy Company through the end of WW II and has been hailed as one of the most accurately depicted and portrayed miniseries of WWII to date. Easy Company 2nd Battalion 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment was formed at Camp Toccoa, Georgia in the early months of 1942. The 506th was born as part of a new concept, which was Parachute Infantry. The first commander of Easy Company was 1LT Herbert Soebel, a man of conviction for what was right, he was more about standards than he was about caring for his Soldiers. During routine in ranks inspections he was proud of how he could find the most the most minute of infractions, such as rust on a hinge plate of a weapon or a dirty bayonet to threads protruding from a newly sewn rank on a uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • November Alumni Issue
    NOVEMBER 1962 ALUMNI ISSUE III o u «I 8'0 1I&"'ht.~ "'"" FRESHMEN RELATIVES OF ALUMNI --- see page 2 NEWS IN BRIEF study: Physical Educati"n, 648; Teacher Ed· method for studying the action of normal lIcation, 285; Recreation and Youth Leader· and pathological joints. The electrogoniome· ship, 139; General Studies, 222; Pre·med, ter, or elgon for short, is an electric device Enrollment Of 1.472 Largest In History. 66; Community and International Services, which automatically records movements of Springfield's enrollment is at a record high, 17; Guidance and Personnel Services, 57; the joints, and was invented by Dr. Karpo· and now surpasses the previous hiJ,(h enroll· and YMCA Physical Education, 31. vich and his son, George, and patented hy ment of 1,465 which took place in 1949. 34 The ratio of men and women continues ap· the US Army. states, the District of Columhia, and 16 for· proximately the same as it was when women Dr. Karpovich has received a renewal grant eign nations are represented on the campus were first admitted to the College eleven of 835,700 from the DuPont Company to con· this year. years ago, with 1,069 men and 403 women. tinue a study of relationship between subjec· Massachusetts leads the list with 528 students, A total of 825 members of the student body tive sensation of comfort and objective psy· followed by New York, 285; Connecticut, now reside in seven residential buildings chological signs. 200; and New Jersey, ISO. Distant states which includes the Senior House, maintained represented include Hawaii, California, Texas, near the campus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Perception of Cataloging Quality Among
    A STUDY OF THE PERCEPTION OF CATALOGING QUALITY AMONG CATALOGERS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES Karen Snow, B.A., M.S. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2011 APPROVED: Shawne D. Miksa, Major Professor William E. Moen, Committee Member Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis, Committee Member Suliman Hawamdeh, Chair of the Department of Library and Information Sciences Linda Schamber, Dean of the College of Information James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Snow, Karen. A study of the perception of cataloging quality among catalogers in academic libraries. Doctor of Philosophy (Information Science), December 2011, 246 pp., 38 tables, 16 figures, references, 113 titles. This study explores the concept of "quality" in library cataloging and examines the perception of quality cataloging among catalogers who work in academic libraries. An examination of the concept of "quality cataloging" in library science literature revealed that even though there is some general agreement on how this concept is defined, the level of detail and focus of these definitions often vary. These various perceptions were dissected in order to develop a framework for evaluating quality cataloging definitions; this framework was used to evaluate study participants' definitions of quality cataloging. Studying cataloger perceptions of quality cataloging is important because it is catalogers (particularly original catalogers) who are largely responsible for what is included in bibliographic records. Survey participants (n = 296) provided their personal definition of quality cataloging as well as their opinions on their department's cataloging, their influence upon their department's policies and procedures, and the specific data that should be included in a quality bibliographic record.
    [Show full text]
  • Contentdm Digital Preservation Feature Flier
    DIGITAL PRESERVATION Keep your digital special collections secure. Where do your digital Preserve your files with original files live? CONTENTdm. CONTENTdm gives you the tools to build, showcase, CONTENTdm’s preservation archive is integrated into and preserve your digital collections online through a its collection-building workflows. As you provide customizable website. your files, the preservation archive develops a health record for each file and collection so you can confirm Now, CONTENTdm includes long-term digital that we received all the files you sent and that they’re preservation tools that are fully integrated into your all free of viruses and in the format that matches their digital collection workflow. This preservation archive file extensions. The system also creates a unique protects your data from physical and cyber disasters fixity key so we can alert you if our regular, automatic or corruption. inspections discover any alterations. Each month, you You can rely on OCLC to secure your files in our receive a report on the health of your collection. ISO-certified data center with copies in multiple data Your files are then housed in OCLC’s controlled centers around the world. OCLC has been storing operating environments dedicated to the ongoing and protecting library information as a non-profit, managed storage of digital content. Our data center is member-driven library cooperative since 1967, so you ISO-27001 certified. With 24/7 physical monitoring by can be confident that your files will remain pristine for security guards, system operators, and cameras, your the future. data is protected from both minor outages and major CONTENTdm’s preservation archive offers you secure, disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Content Activities in Libraries: Same Direction, Different
    OCLC RESEARCH REPORT OPEN CONTENT ACTIVITIES IN LIBRARIES: Same Direction, Different Trajectories Findings from the 2018 OCLC Global Council Survey Titia van der Werf Open Content Activities in Libraries: Same Direction, Different Trajectories Findings from the 2018 OCLC Global Council Survey Titia van der Werf Senior Program Officer © 2020 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ July 2020 OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 978-1-55653-153-8 DOI: 10.25333/vgmw-ba86 OCLC Control Number: 1159711753 ORCID iDs Titia van der Werf http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-5395 Please direct correspondence to: OCLC Research [email protected] Suggested citation: van der Werf, Titia. 2020. Open Content Activities in Libraries: Same Direction, Different Trajectories—Findings from the 2018 OCLC Global Council Survey. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. https://doi.org/10.25333/vgmw-ba86. ERRATA Page 12, figure 1 The divided portions of the EMEA and APAC sections of the pie chart in figure 1 inaccurately represented the numeric values shown in the legends. This error has been corrected and the pie chart now accurately represents the data. This change has been corrected in the report and in the graphics gallery PowerPoint on the supplementals web page. The author thanks Sylvia Moes for spotting the error. Page 21, table 7* • The data in column AU (%) was in error. The data has been replaced with AU (%): 94%, 91%, 77%, 64% 91%, 64%. • The columns containing the data for the UK (#, %) and CA (#, %) were missing.
    [Show full text]