DOCSLIB.ORG

Plateau Mountain Ecological Reserve Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plateau Mountain Ecological Reserve Management Plan PLATEAU MOUNTAIN ECOLOGICAL RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT Technical Report Number: International Standard Book Number: For copies of this report, contact: Kananaskis Country Natural Resources Service Alberta Environment Suite 201, 800 Railway Avenue Canmore, Alberta T1W 1P1 Telephone: (403) 678-5508 Fax: (403) 678-5505 OR Crowsnest Forest Area Land and Forest Service Box 540 Blairmore, AB T0K 0E0 Telephone: (403) 562-3210 Fax: (403) 562-7143 Email: [email protected] ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 SCOPE OF THE PLAN ....................................................................................................1 2.0 SYSTEMS CONTEXT......................................................................................................1 2.1 Ecological Reserves In Alberta......................................................................................1 2.1.1 Classification of Protected Areas ................................................................1 2.1.2 Systems Framework for Ecological Reserves..............................................2 2.1.3 Legislative Framework................................................................................3 2.1.4 The Role of Ecological Reserves..................................................................4 2.2 Role of Plateau Mountain Ecological Reserve ..............................................................6 2.2.1 Location and Significance............................................................................6 3.0 OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................................6 3.1 Location and Regional Setting.......................................................................................6 3.2 Legal Status (Order-in-Council) & Area .......................................................................7 3.3 Boundary Definition & Justification..............................................................................7 3.4 History of Reserve Designation.....................................................................................9 3.5 Resources .......................................................................................................................9 3.5.1 Geology & Landforms..................................................................................9 3.5.2 Soils............................................................................................................10 3.5.3 Climate.......................................................................................................10 3.5.4 Hydrology ..................................................................................................10 3.5.5 Vegetation ..................................................................................................10 3.5.6 Fauna .........................................................................................................12 3.5.7 Visual Landscape (Aesthetics) ...................................................................12 3.5.8 Palaeontology ............................................................................................12 3.5.9 Archaeology ...............................................................................................12 3.5.10 Special Features Summary ........................................................................13 3.6 Land Uses.....................................................................................................................13 3.6.1 Historical Land Use...................................................................................13 3.6.2 Dispositions................................................................................................13 3.6.3 Recreation..................................................................................................13 3.6.4 Surrounding Lands.....................................................................................14 3.6.5 Research.....................................................................................................14 3.6.6 Environmental Education ..........................................................................14 3.7 Commercial Activity....................................................................................................15 3.7.1 Natural Gas................................................................................................15 3.7.2 Communications Facilities ........................................................................15 4.0 MANAGEMENT ISSUES...............................................................................................15 4.1 Minimize Impacts From Ongoing Natural Gas Operations.........................................15 4.2 Unauthorized Vehicle Use and Impacts.......................................................................15 4.3 Reclamation .................................................................................................................16 4.4 Scientific Research.......................................................................................................16 4.5 Heritage Appreciation and Environmental Education .................................................16 4.6 Promotion.....................................................................................................................16 4.7 Public Safety................................................................................................................17 4.8 Recreation ....................................................................................................................17 4.9 Hunting ........................................................................................................................17 4.10 Trapping.......................................................................................................................17 4.11 Grazing.........................................................................................................................17 4.12 Pest/Weed Management...............................................................................................17 4.13 Relationship to Other Plans .........................................................................................18 4.14 Boundary Issues...........................................................................................................18 5.0 VALUES, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................18 5.1 Values ..........................................................................................................................18 5.2 Goals ............................................................................................................................18 5.3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................19 5.3.1 Protection...................................................................................................19 5.3.2 Heritage Appreciation...............................................................................19 5.3.3 Outdoor Recreation...................................................................................19 5.3.4 Tourism ......................................................................................................19 6.0 MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES...................................................................................19 6.1 Protection .....................................................................................................................20 6.1.1 Geologic and Geomorphic Resource Management ...................................20 6.1.2 Atmospheric Monitoring............................................................................20 6.1.3 Aquatic Resource Management .................................................................20 6.1.4 Vegetation Resource Management............................................................20 6.1.5 Faunal Resource Management ..................................................................21 6.1.6 Historic Values Management.....................................................................21 6.1.7 Visual Resource Management....................................................................21 6.1.8 Environmental and Ecological Monitoring ...............................................21 6.2 Uses of Natural and Historic Values............................................................................22 6.2.1 Scientific Research and Collection ............................................................22 6.2.2 Heritage Appreciation...............................................................................22 6.2.3 Recreation..................................................................................................22 6.2.4 Tourism ......................................................................................................23 6.2.5 Non-conforming Uses ................................................................................23 ii 7.0 SURROUNDING LANDS...............................................................................................23 7.1 Offsite Impacts.............................................................................................................23 7.2 Proposed Buffer Zones/Boundary Adjustments ..........................................................23 8.0 RESEARCH AND COLLECTION................................................................................23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milk River – Sage Creek: Coming to Terms on a Grassland Wilderness by Cliff Wallis
    ALBERTA WILDERNESS ARTICLE ASSOCIATION Wild Lands Advocate 9(5): 5-7, October 2001 Milk River – Sage Creek: Coming to Terms on a Grassland Wilderness By Cliff Wallis This is the story of how the AWA became a founding member of the Milk River Management Society in which it is still an active member today. Situated between the Cypress Hills and the Canada-U.S. boundary, Milk River-Sage Creek is one of the least fragmented, most extensive and most diverse prairie upland, wetland and valley landscapes on the glaciated plains of North America. This 5000 sq. km area is hard to describe in anything less than superlatives. Its size, unique geology and diverse ecosystems make it a national treasure. The Great Plains has been profoundly altered by human activities. In just over 100 years, more than 70% of Canada's grasslands have been destroyed by cultivation. Direct loss and fragmentation has changed species' distributions and numbers while transforming entire landscapes and natural ecological processes. It is one of the most endangered natural regions in North America. Despite this, less than 1% of Alberta's remaining grasslands are "protected". This has contributed to the high numbers of species at risk. Of Alberta's vertebrates at risk, over half occur at Milk River-Sage Creek. The area abounds in unique and rare phenomena, but it is the variety in both the rare and the common features that gives Milk River-Sage Creek its tremendous value. Resting atop a badland butte and gazing across the Milk River canyon and rolling grasslands to the forested Sweetgrass Hills, one can contemplate the natural majesty of the Great Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Geography of Southeast Asia
    Physical Geography of Southeast Asia Creating an Annotated Sketch Map of Southeast Asia By Michelle Crane Teacher Consultant for the Texas Alliance for Geographic Education Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 Guiding Question (5 min.) . What processes are responsible for the creation and distribution of the landforms and climates found in Southeast Asia? Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 2 Draw a sketch map (10 min.) . This should be a general sketch . do not try to make your map exactly match the book. Just draw the outline of the region . do not add any features at this time. Use a regular pencil first, so you can erase. Once you are done, trace over it with a black colored pencil. Leave a 1” border around your page. Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 3 Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 4 Looking at your outline map, what two landforms do you see that seem to dominate this region? Predict how these two landforms would affect the people who live in this region? Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 5 Peninsulas & Islands . Mainland SE Asia consists of . Insular SE Asia consists of two large peninsulas thousands of islands . Malay Peninsula . Label these islands in black: . Indochina Peninsula . Sumatra . Label these peninsulas in . Java brown . Sulawesi (Celebes) . Borneo (Kalimantan) . Luzon Texas Alliance for Geographic Education; http://www.geo.txstate.edu/tage/ September 2013 6 Draw a line on your map to indicate the division between insular and mainland SE Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variability of Levees As Measured Using the CPT
    2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA, May 2010 Spatial Variability of Levees as Measured Using the CPT R.E.S. Moss Assistant Professor, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo J. C. Hollenback Graduate Researcher, U.C. Berkeley J. Ng Undergraduate Researcher, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo ABSTRACT: The spatial variability of a soil deposit is something that is commonly discussed but difficult to quantify. The heterogeneity as a function of lateral distance can be critical to the design of long engineered structures such as highways, bridges, levees, and other lifelines. This paper presents a methodology for using CPT mea- surements to quantifying the spatial variability of cone tip resistance along a levee in the California Bay Delta. The results, presented in the form of a general relative va- riogram, identify the distance at which the maximum spatial variability is achieved for a given soil strata. This information helps define minimally correlated stretches of levee for proper failure and risk analysis. Presented herein are methods of interpret- ing, calculating, and analyzing CPT data to arrive at the quantified spatial variability with respect to different static and seismic failure modes common to levee systems. 1 INTRODUCTION Spatial variability of engineering properties in soil strata is inherent to the nature of soil. Spatial variability is controlled primarily by the depositional environment where high energy systems usually deposit materials with high spatial variability (e.g. al- luvial gravels) and low energy systems usually deposit materials with low spatial va- riability (e.g. lacustrine clays). This spatial variability is generally taken into account in geotechnical design in a qualitative empirical manner through appropriately spaced borings to assess the changing subsurface conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • LIESSE Où Klaxonner Pour Faire Chier P. 17 LA POSTE Schwaller De Rien P. 16 DÉCROISSANCE Un Art Consommé P. 7 FOOT Bilan Et P
    Vendredi 22 juin 2018 // No 369 // 9e année CHF 4.– // Abonnement annuel CHF 160.– // www.vigousse.ch FOOT DÉCROISSANCE LA POSTE LIESSE Bilan et perspectives Un art consommé Schwaller Où klaxonner pour PP. 2, 3, 4, 14 P. 7 de rien P. 16 faire chier P. 17 JAA – 1001 Lausanne P.P./Journal – Poste CH SA – Poste Lausanne P.P./Journal JAA – 1001 2 C’EST PAS POUR DIRE ! POINT V 3 opposants se font mystérieusement empoisonner, un Etat qui inonde le Y a faute, ou bien ? reste du monde de fake news, de faits Parité bien alternatifs, de théories du complot et FOOT NEWS On nous cache tout, on nous dit rien ! La vérité est de désinformation stupide, une clique malmenée de partout, sauf, heureusement, dans le seul domaine qui truque toutes les élections depuis qui compte : le football. des années, bref, le royaume du faux ordonnée… et de la magouille. Mais pour le foot, faut pas déconner quand même : on Séverine André Ce lundi, tandis que les petits Suisses mais y a hors-jeu là ! » ; « Hé ! Quel peut parfaitement faire confiance à se remettaient à peine de la nuit de connard, il l’a poussé ! » ; ou « Quel ces mythos. Car le football, c’est la t soudain, dimanche 17 juin, après des folie faisant suite au glorieux match enculé, il s’est laissé tomber ! » Très vérité. nul contre le Brésil, les élèves fran- clairement, c’est le cas que p si, et siècles d’iniquité, la Suisse s’enthousiasme çais gambergeaient sec devant leur seulement si, il y a effectivement Autre preuve que la vérité, c’est pour l’égalité.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015.Pub
    “Environment is but our looking glass.” James Allen August 2015 Lethbridge Waste Diversion Policy SAGE Meetings—no The City of Lethbridge approved Council members were also tion followed by the introduc- meeting in August. a Waste Diversion Policy on briefed on potential five-, sev- tion of surcharges on tipping June 20th which sets a five-year en- and 10 year implementa- fees for targeted materials at Riparian Restoration Work- target of a 30-per-cent overall tion schedules for a diversion the landfill and, in the final shops. August 21st, 28th per-capita waste disposal reduc- strategy for waste from the phase, regulations which could and 29th in Turner Valley. tion by 2021 and a 15-year tar- local ICI/C&D sectors, which include mandatory recycling Registration $50 at Sustain- get of 50 per cent by 2030. together comprise about 75 per and/or disposal bans.” ability Resources. cent of the waste that enters the From the City of Lethbridge: landfill each year. Each pro- The Industrial, Commercial Lethbridge Sustainable Liv- “Existing residential recycling posed implementation schedule and Institutional Recycling ing Association is planning programs divert about 20 per would include a three-phase Implementation Strategy de- AppleFest for August 29th. cent of residential waste from approach, starting with educa- scribes the plan which includes See their website for details the landfill. The draft policy focused stakeholder engage- and apple-picking opportu- proposes to increase residential ment and the development of nities: waste diversion to 50 per cent by best practices to help Leth- www.lethbridgesustainableli 2021 and 65 per cent by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Issues in the Paleozoic Plateau a Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery
    GGroundwaterroundwater IssuesIssues inin tthehe PaleozoicPaleozoic PlateauPlateau A Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery Iowa Groundwater Association Field Trip Guidebook No. 1 Iowa Geological and Water Survey Guidebook Series No. 27 Dunning Spring, near Decorah in Winneshiek County, Iowa September 29, 2008 In Conjunction with the 53rd Annual Midwest Ground Water Conference Grand River Center, Dubuque, Iowa, September 30 – October 2, 2008 Groundwater Issues in the Paleozoic Plateau A Taste of Karst, a Modicum of Geology, and a Whole Lot of Scenery Iowa Groundwater Association Field Trip Guidebook No. 1 Iowa Geological and Water Survey Guidebook Series No. 27 In Conjunction with the 53rd Annual Midwest Ground Water Conference Grand River Center, Dubuque, Iowa, September 30 – October 2, 2008 With contributions by M.K. Anderson Robert McKay Iowa DNR-Water Supply Engineering Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Bruce Blair Jeff Myrom Iowa DNR-Forestry Iowa DNR-Solid Waste Michael Bounk Eric O’Brien Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Karen Osterkamp Lora Friest Iowa DNR-Fisheries Northeast Iowa Resource Conservation and Development Jean C. Prior Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey James Hedges Luther College James Ranum Natural Resources Conservation Service John Hogeman Winneshiek County Landfi ll Operator Robert Rowden Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Claire Hruby Iowa DNR-Geographic Information Systems Joe Sanfi lippo Iowa DNR-Manchester Field Offi ce Bill Kalishek Gary Siegwarth Iowa DNR-Fisheries Iowa DNR-Fisheries George E. Knudson Mary Skopec Luther College Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Bob Libra Stephanie Surine Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Huaibao Liu Paul VanDorpe Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa DNR-Geological and Water Survey Iowa Department of Natural Resources Richard Leopold, Director September 2008 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Management Assessments and Planning for Livestock and Wildlife
    Range Management Assessments and Planning For Livestock and Wildlife WE PROVIDE A COMPLETE RANGE OF RANGE AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN ALL ECOSYSTEMS Comprehensive Range Inventories: Range and Riparian Health Assessments, Detailed Vegetation Transects, Robel Pole Assessments, Browse Assessments, Invasive Species Inventories, Soil Assessments, and Production Clips Land Classification and Mapping: Plant Community Classification, High Quality Map Production, Land Use, and Management Planning Maps Range Management Planning: Comprehensive Analysis and Presentation of Data, Multivariate and Univariate Statistical Analysis, Calculating Sustainable Carrying Capacities, Creation of Grazing Plans, Creating Complex Plans for Multiple Stakeholders: Integration of Recreation, Multiple Species, Rare Species, and Habitat Protection into Management Plans SPECIALIZED SKILLS AND ABILITIES Expert Plant Taxonomists: Authors of the Common Plants of The Western Rangelands, Three Range Team Award Winning Rangeland Agrologists and Taxonomists Real World Management Experience: Personnel have managed ranches and rangelands privately and professionally We have extensive experience creating rangeland management plans for livestock and wildlife. We are experienced completing plant community mapping, range health assessments, detailed baseline transects, and creating comprehensive management plans for all forms of large grazing/browsing animals including livestock and wildlife species. We have provided dozens of long-term management plans for public lands management
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2015-2016 Annual Report
    2015-2016 Annual Report Defending Wild Alberta through Awareness and Action for 51 years 2 ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL REPORT 2015 - 2016 Buffalo Lake Alberta - Dan Olson Alberta Wilderness Association Provincial Office – Hillhurst Cottage School 455 – 12 St NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1Y9 Phone 403.283.2025 • Fax 403.270.2743 Email: [email protected] Web server: AlbertaWilderness.ca Contributions to the Annual Report are provided by AWA board and staff members. COVER PHOTO – VIEW FROM POCATERRA RIDGE – ANDREA JOHANCSIK 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS WILDERNESS FOR TOMORROW ................................................................................................................... 8 WHO WE ARE ................................................................................................................................................ 9 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................................................................................ 10 STAFF ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 MISSION, VISION, VALUES, OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................... 11 Vision ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Values ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Significant Areas of Alberta Volumes 1, 2 and 3
    Environmentally Significant Areas of Alberta Volumes 1, 2 and 3 Prepared by: Sweetgrass Consultants Ltd. Calgary, AB for: Resource Data Division Alberta Environmental Protection Edmonton, Alberta March 1997 Environmentally Significant Areas of Alberta Volume 1 Prepared by: Sweetgrass Consultants Ltd. Calgary, AB for: Resource Data Division Alberta Environmental Protection Edmonton, Alberta March 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Large portions of native habitats have been converted to other uses. Surface mining, oil and gas exploration, forestry, agricultural, industrial and urban developments will continue to put pressure on the native species and habitats. Clearing and fragmentation of natural habitats has been cited as a major area of concern with respect to management of natural systems. While there has been much attention to managing and protecting endangered species, a consensus is emerging that only a more broad-based ecosystem and landscape approach to preserving biological diversity will prevent species from becoming endangered in the first place. Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs) are important, useful and often sensitive features of the landscape. As an integral component of sustainable development strategies, they provide long-term benefits to our society by maintaining ecological processes and by providing useful products. The identification and management of ESAs is a valuable addition to the traditional socio-economic factors which have largely determined land use planning in the past. The first ESA study done in Alberta was in 1983 for the Calgary Regional Planning Commission region. Numerous ESA studies were subsequently conducted through the late 1980s and early 1990s. ESA studies of the Parkland, Grassland, Canadian Shield, Foothills and Boreal Forest Natural Regions are now all completed while the Rocky Mountain Natural Region has been only partially completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee High Plateau Major Land Resource Area (MLRA)
    MLRA 25 – Owyhee High Plateau (Utah portion) MLRA 25 – Owyhee High Plateau (Utah portion) Ecological Zone Upland Mountain High Mountain Subalpine Precipitation (inches) 12-17 inches 16-22 inches 16-22 inches 20-27 inches Elevation 5,000 -7,000 6,000 – 8,600 8,000-9,000 9,000 - 9,300 Soil Moisture Regime Typic Xeric Typic Xeric Typic Xeric Udic Soil Temp Regime Mesic Frigid Cryic Cryic Freeze free Days 80-120 60 - 90 30 - 40 20 -35 Mountain mahogany, Sagebrushes and Mountain big Aspen, Mountain big Subalpine Fir, browse Notes sagebrush sagebrush Subalpine sagebrush 300 – 500 and 1,100-2,100 and 2,400-2,500 lbs/ac 800 – 1000 lbs.ac 400-600 lbs/ac All values in this table are approximate and should be used as guidelines. Different combinations of temperature, precipitation and soil type can place an ecological site into different zones. Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) D25 D25 - Owyhee High Plateau E47A - and Ui D28A 030 60 120 Miles Great Salt 1:3,000,000 Lake Area 25—Owyhee High Plateau This area is in Nevada (52 percent),Idaho (29 percent), Oregon (16 percent), and Utah (3 percent). It makes up about 28,930 square miles (74,960 square kilometers). The city of Elko, Nevada, which is along Interstate 80, occurs in this MLRA. The Humboldt-Toiyabe and Sawtooth National Forests and numerous wilderness study areas also occur in this MLRA. Most of the wilderness study areas are in the high desert canyon lands of southern Idaho. The Duck Valley, South Fork, Ruby Valley, and Te-Moak Indian Reservations are in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks
    54078 US Hwy 2 West Glasgow, MT 59230 November 16, 2012 Governor’s Office – Sheena Wilson Clay Vincent, Hill County Planner Montana State Library, Helena A.T. Stafne, MFWP Commissioner Montana Department of Environmental Quality Representative Kris Hansen Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks David Aageson Director’s Office BFW Land Company Fish and Wildlife Division Donna Greytak Lands Section Arnold Hall Parks Division Healy Family, LP Commission Secretary James Hirst Legal Unit Lee and Roxanne Laeupple Montana DNRC Northeastern Land Office John Schaller Environmental Quality Council Steve and Wanda McIntosh MT Environmental Information Center Evelyn Wanke State Historic Preservation Office Trevor Wolery Hill County Commissioners Mark Aageson Dear Interested Party: You recently received documents relating to the proposed action of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) purchasing 2,992 acres of property for a Wildlife Management Area located approximately 42 miles northwest of Havre. The property is located along the Milk River and consists primarily of Milk River riparian habitats and associated uplands. The primary purpose of this proposal is to conserve and enhance native areas that provide important habitat for game and nongame species and to provide additional recreational opportunities for the general public. This habitat provides critical winter range for big game species and the Milk River serves as a migratory corridor for many species. Protecting and enhancing the existing habitat is expected to increase use by game animals, including mule deer, elk, white-tailed deer, antelope, pheasants, sharp- tailed grouse, and waterfowl along with a variety of native nongame species of birds, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals.
    [Show full text]