DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 © 48Th European Contact L Served

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 © 48Th European Contact L Served Overhauling the phylogenetic origins and early evolution of lizards and 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © II Joint Congress snakeson Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48thTiago European R. Simões Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Squamata Lizards Snakes Amphisbaenians Ca. 6.300 spp Ca. 3.500 spp 197 spp Lepidosauria = Squamata + Rhynchocephalia 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th EuropeanSphenodon Contactpunctatus Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 242ma 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Jones et al. 2018 © II Joint Congress(2013) on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproductionWhat even in partare is prohibited. the closest relatives to lepidosaurs? Which were the earliest squamates? When did the major reptile clades originate? 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Early lepidosaur evolution Current impediments to advance our knowledge 1- Origin of squamates: ~240 mya (Early-Middle Triassic) Oldest known fossils: Middle Jurassic (165 MYA) of Britain, Morocco, Central Asia. 2- They look like this: 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. Balnealacerta silvestris Bellairsia gracilis Oxiella tenuis (NHMUK R12669) (NHMUK2018 R12678) © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology(NHMUK 2018. All rights R12689) reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Early lepidosaur evolution Current impediments to advance our knowledge 3- Which of these are lepidosauromorphs? Younginiforms: Gauthier 1984; Benton 1985, 1990; Carrol 1988; Evans 1988 Paliguanids: Gauthier 1984; Benton 1985, 1990; Carroll 1975, 1988; Evans 1988 Kuehneosaurids: Gauthier 1984; Evans 1988; Caldwell 1996; Motani et al. 1998; Lee 1997, Lee 2001 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. Sauropterygians: Rieppel & de Braga 1996; Wilkinson 1997; Motani et al. 1998; Lee 2001; Hill 2005 Turtles: Rieppel & de Braga 1996; Caldwell 1996; Motani et al. 1998; Müller 2004; Lyson et al. 2012 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © 48th European Contact Lens Society Of Ophthalmologists. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited] . Early lepidosaur evolution Current impediments to advance our knowledge 4- Taxonomic sampling in broad scale reptile relationships: 10,000 species of extant forms (64 families) + hundreds of extinct lineages represented as… 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018 © II Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology 2018. All rights reserved - Any reproduction even in part is prohibited. 2018Gauthier ©et
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The First Possible Choristoderan Trackway from the Lower
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The frst possible choristoderan trackway from the Lower Cretaceous Daegu Formation of South Korea and its implications on choristoderan locomotion Yuong‑Nam Lee1*, Dal‑Yong Kong2 & Seung‑Ho Jung2 Here we report a new quadrupedal trackway found in the Lower Cretaceous Daegu Formation (Albian) in the vicinity of Ulsan Metropolitan City, South Korea, in 2018. A total of nine manus‑pes imprints show a strong heteropodous quadrupedal trackway (length ratio is 1:3.36). Both manus and pes tracks are pentadactyl with claw marks. The manus prints rotate distinctly outward while the pes prints are nearly parallel to the direction of travel. The functional axis in manus and pes imprints suggests that the trackmaker moved along the medial side during the stroke progressions (entaxonic), indicating weight support on the inner side of the limbs. There is an indication of webbing between the pedal digits. These new tracks are assigned to Novapes ulsanensis, n. ichnogen., n. ichnosp., which are well‑matched not only with foot skeletons and body size of Monjurosuchus but also the fossil record of choristoderes in East Asia, thereby N. ulsanensis could be made by a monjurosuchid‑like choristoderan and represent the frst possible choristoderan trackway from Asia. N. ulsanensis also suggests that semi‑aquatic choristoderans were capable of walking semi‑erect when moving on the ground with a similar locomotion pattern to that of crocodilians on land. South Korea has become globally famous for various tetrapod footprints from Cretaceous strata1, among which some clades such as frogs2, birds3 and mammals4 have been proved for their existences only with ichnological evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diapsida: Saurosphargidae), with Implications for the Morphological Diversity and Phylogeny of the Group
    Geol. Mag.: page 1 of 21. c Cambridge University Press 2013 1 doi:10.1017/S001675681300023X A new species of Largocephalosaurus (Diapsida: Saurosphargidae), with implications for the morphological diversity and phylogeny of the group ∗ CHUN LI †, DA-YONG JIANG‡, LONG CHENG§, XIAO-CHUN WU†¶ & OLIVIER RIEPPEL ∗ Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, China ‡Department of Geology and Geological Museum, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China §Wuhan Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Wuhan, 430223, PR China ¶Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, STN ‘D’, Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, Canada Department of Geology, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA (Received 31 July 2012; accepted 25 February 2013) Abstract – Largocephalosaurus polycarpon Cheng et al. 2012a was erected after the study of the skull and some parts of a skeleton and considered to be an eosauropterygian. Here we describe a new species of the genus, Largocephalosaurus qianensis, based on three specimens. The new species provides many anatomical details which were described only briefly or not at all in the type species, and clearly indicates that Largocephalosaurus is a saurosphargid. It differs from the type species mainly in having three premaxillary teeth, a very short retroarticular process, a large pineal foramen, two sacral vertebrae, and elongated small granular osteoderms mixed with some large ones along the lateral most side of the body. With additional information from the new species, we revise the diagnosis and the phylogenetic relationships of Largocephalosaurus and clarify a set of diagnostic features for the Saurosphargidae Li et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small Lepidosauromorph Reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland
    A SMALL LEPIDOSAUROMORPH REPTILE FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF POLAND SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA Evans, S.E. and Borsuk−Białynicka, M. 2009. A small lepidosauromorph reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica 65, 179–202. The Early Triassic karst deposits of Czatkowice quarry near Kraków, southern Poland, has yielded a diversity of fish, amphibians and small reptiles. Two of these reptiles are lepido− sauromorphs, a group otherwise very poorly represented in the Triassic record. The smaller of them, Sophineta cracoviensis gen. et sp. n., is described here. In Sophineta the unspecial− ised vertebral column is associated with the fairly derived skull structure, including the tall facial process of the maxilla, reduced lacrimal, and pleurodonty, that all resemble those of early crown−group lepidosaurs rather then stem−taxa. Cladistic analysis places this new ge− nus as the sister group of Lepidosauria, displacing the relictual Middle Jurassic genus Marmoretta and bringing the origins of Lepidosauria closer to a realistic time frame. Key words: Reptilia, Lepidosauria, Triassic, phylogeny, Czatkowice, Poland. Susan E. Evans [[email protected]], Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Uni− versity College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. Magdalena Borsuk−Białynicka [[email protected]], Institut Paleobiologii PAN, Twarda 51/55, PL−00−818 Warszawa, Poland. Received 8 March 2006, accepted 9 January 2007 180 SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA INTRODUCTION Amongst living reptiles, lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, amphisbaenians, and tuatara) form the largest and most successful group with more than 7 000 widely distributed species. The two main lepidosaurian clades are Rhynchocephalia (the living Sphenodon and its extinct relatives) and Squamata (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians).
    [Show full text]
  • Tiago Rodrigues Simões
    Diapsid Phylogeny and the Origin and Early Evolution of Squamates by Tiago Rodrigues Simões A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta © Tiago Rodrigues Simões, 2018 ABSTRACT Squamate reptiles comprise over 10,000 living species and hundreds of fossil species of lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians, with their origins dating back at least as far back as the Middle Jurassic. Despite this enormous diversity and a long evolutionary history, numerous fundamental questions remain to be answered regarding the early evolution and origin of this major clade of tetrapods. Such long-standing issues include identifying the oldest fossil squamate, when exactly did squamates originate, and why morphological and molecular analyses of squamate evolution have strong disagreements on fundamental aspects of the squamate tree of life. Additionally, despite much debate, there is no existing consensus over the composition of the Lepidosauromorpha (the clade that includes squamates and their sister taxon, the Rhynchocephalia), making the squamate origin problem part of a broader and more complex reptile phylogeny issue. In this thesis, I provide a series of taxonomic, phylogenetic, biogeographic and morpho-functional contributions to shed light on these problems. I describe a new taxon that overwhelms previous hypothesis of iguanian biogeography and evolution in Gondwana (Gueragama sulamericana). I re-describe and assess the functional morphology of some of the oldest known articulated lizards in the world (Eichstaettisaurus schroederi and Ardeosaurus digitatellus), providing clues to the ancestry of geckoes, and the early evolution of their scansorial behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2020 Issue
    THE FROG AND TADPOLE STUDY GROUP NSW Inc. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/FATSNSW/ Email: [email protected] PO Box 296 Rockdale NSW 2216 NEWSLETTER No. 165 FEBRUARY 2020 Frogwatch Helpline 0419 249 728 Website: www.fats.org.au ABN: 34 282 154 794 Photo by Jayden Walsh Crucifix Frog Notaden bennettii You are invited to our FATS meeting. It’s free. Everyone is welcome. Arrive from 6.30 pm for a 7pm start. Friday 7 February 2020 FATS meet at the Education Centre, Bicentennial Pk, Sydney Olympic Park Easy walk from Concord West railway station and straight down Victoria Ave. Take a torch in winter. By car: Enter from Australia Ave at the Bicentennial Park main entrance, turn off to the right and drive through the park. It’s a one way road. Or enter from Bennelong Rd / Parkway. It is a short stretch of two way road. th FATS meeting, Friday 7 February 2020 Park in P10f car park, the last car park before the Bennelong Rd. exit gate. 6.30 pm Lost Green Tree Frogs Litoria caerulea frogs and “friends” seeking forever homes: Priority to new pet frog owners. Please bring your membership card and cash $50 donation. CONTENTS PAGE Sorry, we don’t have EFTPOS. Your NSW NPWS amphibian licence must be sighted on the night. Adopted frogs can never Last meeting 2 be released. Please contact us first if you plan to adopt a frog. Corroboree poem by Giles Watson 3 We will confirm what frogs are ready to rehome. Vale John Diamond 7.00 pm Welcome and announcements Ourimbah FATS field trip, 4 7.45 pm Our main speaker is Jordan Crawford-Ash, from Australian notes from Josie Styles Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Calibration Sausage Exemplified by Recalibrating the Transcriptomic Timetree of Jawed Vertebrates
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.19.882829; this version posted January 5, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. The making of calibration sausage exemplified by recalibrating the transcriptomic timetree of jawed vertebrates 1 David Marjanović 2 Department of Evolutionary Morphology, Science Programme “Evolution and Geoprocesses”, 3 Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institute for Evolutionary and Biodiversity Research, Berlin, 4 Germany 5 ORCID: 0000-0001-9720-7726 6 Correspondence: 7 David Marjanović 8 [email protected] 9 Keywords: timetree, calibration, divergence date, Gnathostomata, Vertebrata 10 Abstract 11 Molecular divergence dating has the potential to overcome the incompleteness of the fossil record in 12 inferring when cladogenetic events (splits, divergences) happened, but needs to be calibrated by the 13 fossil record. Ideally but unrealistically, this would require practitioners to be specialists in molecular 14 evolution, in the phylogeny and the fossil record of all sampled taxa, and in the chronostratigraphy of 15 the sites the fossils were found in. Paleontologists have therefore tried to help by publishing 16 compendia of recommended calibrations, and molecular biologists unfamiliar with the fossil record 17 have made heavy use of such works (in addition to using scattered primary sources
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidosaurian Reptile Champsosaurus in North America
    Photograph bJ, fames Wagoner. LIFE RESTORATION OF CHAMPSOSAURUS HUNTING. Painting by J erome Connolly in The Science Museum of Minnesota. THE LEPIDOSAURIAN REPTILE CHAMPSOSAURUS IN NORTH AMERICA BRUCE R. ERICKSON CURATOR OF PALEONTOLOGY MONOGRAPH VOLUME 1: PALEONTOLOGY Published by THE SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ST. PAUL: March 31, 1972 MONOGRAPH OF THE SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA VOLUME 1 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 77-186470 Standard Boole Number 911338-78-0 CONTENTS Page Illustrations ......................................... 2 Introduction ................................................. 5 Species of Champsosaurus . 7 Skull of Cha;rnpsosauru.s gigas, New Species. 12 Postcranial Skeleton of Champsosaurus gigas, New Species ... 26 General Morphology . 52 Skull ................................................... 52 Postcranial Skeleton . 53 Some Aspects of Functional Morphology . 72 Responsive Functions . 75 Correlations and Distribution. 82 Phylogeny . 86 Summary ................................................... 89 Bibliography . 90 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURES Page 1. Correlation Chart of Champsosaurs. 9 2. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, dorsal view, PU 16239. 13 3. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view, PU 16239. 14 4. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, dorsal view, PU 16240. 15 5. Skull of Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view, PU 16240. 16 6. Restoration of skull, C hampsosaurus gig as, dorsal view. 19 7. Restoration of skull, Champsosaurus gigas, ventral view. 22 8. Occipital region of skull, Cha.mpsosaurus gigas. 23 9. Lateral view of mandible, Champsosaurus gigas. 25 10. Cervical vertebrae, Champsosa.urus gigas. 27 11. Pleurocentrum of atlas, Champsosaurus gigas. 28 12. Hypocentrum of atlas, Champsosaurus gigas. 28 13. Posterior cervical centrum, Champsosaurus gigas. 29 14. Intercentrum of cervical vertebra, Chmnpsosaurus gigas. 29 15. Dorsal vertebra, Champsosaurus gigas. 30 16. Sacrum, lateral view, Champsosaurus gigas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Phylogenetic Systematics and the Origins of Amphibians and Reptiles
    Phylogenetic Systematics and the 2 Origins of Amphibians and Reptiles he extant amphibians and reptiles are a diverse col- lection of animals with evolutionary histories dating 2.1 Principles of Phylogenetics Tback to the Early Carboniferous period. A phylo- and Taxonomy genetic perspective helps us visualize the relationships among these organisms and interpret the evolution of Phylogenies are the basis of the taxonomic structure of rep- their physiological, morphological, and behavioral char- tiles and amphibians. A taxon (plural taxa; from the Greek acteristics. To gain this perspective, it is important to un- tax, “to put in order”) is any unit of organisms given a for- derstand how phylogenies are created and used. Thus, mal name. For example, the common five-lined skink (Ples- we begin with a brief review of phylogenetic systematics tiodon fasciatus) from eastern North America is a taxon, as is and taxonomy and then use this framework to examine its entire genus (Plestiodon), the group containing all skinks the transition from fi shlike aquatic vertebrates to the ear- (Scincidae), and several more inclusive, larger taxonomic liest terrestrial tetrapods (from the Greek tetra, “four,” + groups (Squamata, Reptilia, Tetrapoda, Vertebrata, etc.) to podos, “foot”) and the origins of modern amphibian and which it belongs. A monophyletic taxon, or clade, is made reptile groups. up of a common ancestor and all of its descendant taxa. Taxonomy is the science of categorizing, or classify- Phylogenies can be depicted in a variety of styles (Figure ing, Earth’s living organisms. A phylogeny is a hypothesis 2.1). A node is the point at which a common ancestor gives of the evolutionary relationships of these categories of rise to two sister lineages, or branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Lizards and Worm Lizards (Reptilia, Squamata) from the Neogene and Quaternary of Europe: an Overview
    Swiss Journal of Palaeontology (2019) 138:177–211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0172-y (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) REGULAR RESEARCH ARTICLE Fossil lizards and worm lizards (Reptilia, Squamata) from the Neogene and Quaternary of Europe: an overview 1 1,2 Andrea Villa • Massimo Delfino Received: 16 August 2018 / Accepted: 19 October 2018 / Published online: 29 October 2018 Ó Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz (SCNAT) 2018 Abstract Lizards were and still are an important component of the European herpetofauna. The modern European lizard fauna started to set up in the Miocene and a rich fossil record is known from Neogene and Quaternary sites. At least 12 lizard and worm lizard families are represented in the European fossil record of the last 23 Ma. The record comprises more than 3000 occurrences from more than 800 localities, mainly of Miocene and Pleistocene age. By the beginning of the Neogene, a marked faunistic change is detectable compared to the lizard fossil record of Palaeogene Europe. This change is reflected by other squamates as well and might be related to an environmental deterioration occurring roughly at the Oligocene/ Miocene boundary. Nevertheless, the diversity was still rather high in the Neogene and started to decrease with the onset of the Quaternary glacial cycles. This led to the current impoverished lizard fauna, with the southward range shrinking of the most thermophilic taxa (e.g., agamids, amphisbaenians) and the local disappearance of other groups (e.g., varanids). Our overview of the known fossil record of European Neogene and Quaternary lizards and worm lizards highlighted a substantial number of either unpublished or poorly known occurrences often referred to wastebasket taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylonyms; a Companion to the Phylocode
    Pan-Lepidosauria J. A. Gauthier and K. de Queiroz, new clade name Registration Number: 118 2009; Evans and Borsuk-Bialylicka, 2009; Evans and Jones, 2010; but see Müller, 2004; De!nition: !e total clade of the crown clade Jones et al., 2013). More recently, kuehneosaurs Lepidosauria. !is is a crown-based total-clade have been inferred to be stem archosaurs close de"nition. Abbreviated de"nition: total ∇ of to Trilophosaurus buettneri by Pritchard and Lepidosauria. Nesbitt (2017), although Simões et al. (2018) placed them as either stem saurians or stem Etymology: Derived from pan (Greek), here archosaurs depending on the analysis, but in referring to “pan-monophylum,” another term either case only distantly related to T. buettneri. for “total clade,” and Lepidosauria, the name !e Early Triassic Sophineta cracoviensis and the of the corresponding crown clade; hence, “the Middle Jurassic Marmoretta oxoniensis have been total clade of Lepidosauria.” more consistently regarded as stem lepidosaurs, although that inference depends upon cor- Reference Phylogeny: Gauthier et al. (1988) rect association among disarticulated remains Figure 13, where the clade in question is named (Evans, 1991; Waldman and Evans, 1994; Lepidosauromorpha and is hypothesized to Evans, 2009; Evans and Borsuk-Bialylicka, include Younginiformes, which is no longer con- 2009; Evans and Jones, 2010; Jones et al., 2013; sidered part of the clade (see Composition). Renesto and Bernardi, 2014). Depending on the analysis, Simões et al. (2018) inferred S. Composition: Pan-Lepidosauria is composed cracoviensis to be either a stem lepidosaurian of Lepidosauria (Pan-Sphenodon plus Pan- or a stem squamatan, but they consistently Squamata, see entry in this volume) and all inferred M.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a New Lepidosaur Clade
    A new lepidosaur clade: the Tritosauria DAVID PETERS Independent researcher, 311 Collinsville Avenue, Collinsville, Illinois 62234 U.S.A. [email protected] RH: PETERS—TRITOSAURIA 1 ABSTRACT—Several lizard-like taxa do not nest well within the Squamata or the Rhynchocephalia. Their anatomical differences separate them from established clades. In similar fashion, macrocnemids and cosesaurids share few traits with putative sisters among the prolacertiformes. Pterosaurs are not at all like traditional archosauriforms. Frustrated with this situation, workers have claimed that pterosaurs appeared without obvious antecedent in the fossil record. All these morphological ‘misfits’ have befuddled researchers seeking to shoehorn them into established clades using traditional restricted datasets. Here a large phylogenetic analysis of 413 taxa and 228 characters resolves these issues by opening up the possibilities, providing more opportunities for enigma taxa to nest more parsimoniously with similar sisters. Remarkably, all these ‘misfits’ nest together in a newly recovered and previously unrecognized clade of lepidosaurs, the Tritosauria or ‘third lizards,’ between the Rhynchocephalia and the Squamata. Tritosaurs range from small lizard-like forms to giant marine predators and volant monsters. Some tritosaurs were bipeds. Others had chameleon-like appendages. With origins in the Late Permian, the Tritosauria became extinct at the K–T boundary. Overall, the new tree topology sheds light on this clade and several other ‘dark corners’ in the family tree of the Amniota. Now pterosaurs have more than a dozen antecedents in the fossil record documenting a gradual accumulation of pterosaurian traits. INTRODUCTION The Lepidosauria was erected by Romer (1956) to include diapsids lacking archosaur characters. Later, with the advent of computer-assisted phylogenetic analyses, 2 many of Romer’s ‘lepidosaurs’ (Protorosauria/Prolacertiformes, Trilophosauria, and Rhynchosauria) were transferred to the Archosauromorpha (Benton, 1985; Gauthier, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Evolutionary Origins and Losses of Tooth Complexity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.042796; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Multiple evolutionary origins and losses of tooth 2 complexity in squamates 3 4 Fabien Lafuma*a, Ian J. Corfe*a, Julien Clavelb,c, Nicolas Di-Poï*a 5 6 aDevelopmental Biology Program, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, FIN- 7 00014 Helsinki, Finland 8 bDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5DB, United 9 Kingdom 10 cLaboratoire d’Écologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Anthropisés (LEHNA), Université 11 Claude Bernard Lyon 1 – UMR CNRS 5023, ENTPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 12 13 *Mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.042796; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 14 Teeth act as tools for acquiring and processing food and so hold a prominent role in 15 vertebrate evolution1,2. In mammals, dental-dietary adaptations rely on tooth shape and 16 complexity variations controlled by cusp number and pattern – the main features of the 17 tooth surface3,4.
    [Show full text]