DOCSLIB.ORG

SOUTH and WEST BERKELEY Alameda County Congestion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOUTH and WEST BERKELEY Alameda County Congestion Final S OUTH AND W E S T B ERKELEY COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Alameda County Congestion Management Agency June 4, 2007 DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIR ONMENT Final S OUTH AND W E S T B ERKELEY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Submitted to Alameda County Congestion Management Agency June 4, 2007 DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIR ONMENT 1625 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 300 TEL: 510 848 3815 BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94709 FAX: 510 848 4315 in association with Nelson\Nygaard Consulting ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to all who participated. A. Project Team Diane Stark, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA) Therese Knudsen, Metropolitan Transportation Agency (MTC) Matt Nichols, City of Berkeley Lila Hussain, City of Berkeley Ian S. Moore, Design, Community and Environment (DC&E) Christina Ferracane, DC&E Richard Weiner, DC&E Team, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Rachel Ede, DC&E Team, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates B. Berkeley Youth Works Juanita McMullen, Director Narender Sharma, Student Garland Yul Albert, Student Christina Bailey, Student Victoria Session, Student Ramon Cardona, Student C. Building Opportunities for Self Sufficiency Janny Castillo, Coordinator Pauline Harris, Survey administrator Donna Hayes, Survey administrator Caro Snook, Survey administrator Patricia Taylor, Survey administrator Patricia Valay, Survey administrator ALAMEDA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY SOUTH AND WEST BERKELEY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS D. Community-Based Organizations Betsy Morris, West Berkeley Neighborhood Development Corporation Lila Hussain, Program Manager (former), Urban Habitat E. Technical Advisory Committee Nathan Landau, Project Manager, AC Transit Service Planning Kenya Wheeler, Senior Planner, BART Val Menotti, Deputy Manager Stations, BART Naomi Armenta, Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................... 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................. I-1 II. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... II-1 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................... III-1 IV. TRANSPORTATION GAPS......................................................................... IV-1 V. COMMUNITY OUTREACH ........................................................................ V-1 VI. SOLUTIONS............................................................................................ VI-1 VII. FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................................. VII-1 APPENDIX A: COMMUNITY QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF FOCUS GROUP COMMENTS i ALAMEDA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY SOUTH AND WEST BERKELEY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures Figure III-1 South and West Berkeley Project Area ............................... III-2 Figure III-2 Residents Under 18, South and West Berkeley, 2000...................................................................................... III-6 Figure III-3 Residents 65 or Older, South and West Berkeley, 2000...................................................................................... III-7 Figure III-4 Distribution of South and West Berkeley Residents in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty), 1999.................................................................................... III-12 Figure III-5 Distribution of Households with No Vehicles, 2000.................................................................................... III-15 Figure IV-1 AC Transit Service and Frequencies, South and West Berkeley......................................................................IV-4 List of Tables Table I -1 Summary of Recommended Solutions and Strategies .................................................................................I-5 Table I-2 Potential Funding Sources by Project Type ..................................I-6 Table III-1 Race of Residents, Project Area and City of Berkeley, 2000...................................................................... III-4 Table III-2 Age Distribution of South and West Berkeley Residents, 2000 .................................................................... III-5 Table III-3 Primary Household Language, 2000 ................................... III-9 Table III-4 Linguistic Isolation, 2000..................................................... III-9 Table III-5 Income Ranges for South and West Berkeley Households, 1999............................................................... III-13 Table III-6 Population in Poverty (200% of Federal Poverty), 1999.................................................................................... III-13 Table III-7 Vehicle Availability, South and West Berkeley Residents, 2000 .................................................................. III-16 Table III-8 Mode of Travel to Work, 2000.......................................... III-17 ii ALAMEDA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY SOUTH AND WEST BERKELEY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table IV-1 Summary of AC Transit Services Serving South and West Berkeley............................................................... IV-2 Table IV-2 Summary of BART Service to South and West Berkeley............................................................................... IV-3 Table IV-3 Lifeline Transit Routes Serving South and West Berkeley............................................................................... IV-7 Table IV-4 Lifeline Routes Frequency of Service.................................. IV-9 Table IV-5 Frequency of Service for Non-Lifeline Routes ................. IV-12 Table IV-6 Lifeline Routes Hours of Operation Objectives ............... IV-14 Table IV-7 Hours of Operation for Non-Lifeline Routes................... IV-15 Table V-1 Survey Responses for Each Mode .............................................. V-4 Table V-2 Age Distribution of Survey Respondents............................. V-5 Table V-3 AC Transit: Summary of Issues and Comments from Surveys......................................................................... V-9 Table V-4 AC Transit: Summary of Focus Groups........................... V-11 Table V-5 BART: Summary of Issues and Comments from Surveys................................................................................ V-13 Table V-6 BART: Summary of Focus Groups.................................... V-14 Table V-7 Walking: specific locations for improvements* ................ V-15 Table V-8 Walking: Summary of Focus Groups................................. V-16 Table V-9 Bicycling: Specific Locations For Improvements*............ VI-16 Table VI-1 Evaluation Criteria for Transportation Strategies .............. VI-4 Table VI-2 Evaluation of Route 9 Frequency and Span Improvements...................................................................... VI-8 Table VI-3 Evaluation of Route 19 Frequency Improvements ........... VI-10 Table VI-4 Evaluation of BART Richmond Line Frequency Improvements.................................................................... VI-12 Table VI-5 Evaluation of Bus Stop and Shelter Improvements.................................................................... VI-15 Table VI-6 Evaluation of Other Transit Information......................... VI-18 Table VI-7 Evaluation of BART to Bus Real-Time Arrival Information ....................................................................... VI-20 Table VI-8 Evaluation of Low-Income Transit Fare Subsidy ............. VI-23 iii ALAMEDA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY SOUTH AND WEST BERKELEY COMMUNITY BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table VI-9 Evaluation of AC Transit Weekend Transfer Window Extension............................................................VI-26 Table VI-10 Evaluation of Improving Signal Timing............................VI-29 Table VI-11 Evaluation of Improving Crosswalk Visibility .................VI-30 Table VI-12 Evaluation of Improving Lighting.....................................VI-32 Table VI-13 Evaluation of Providing More Locations for Safe Bicycle Storage...................................................................VI-33 Table VI-14 Evaluation of Educating Cyclists about Bicycle Boulevards..........................................................................VI-34 Table VI-15 Evaluation of Improving Crossings at Bicycle Boulevards..........................................................................VI-35 Table VI-16 Evaluation of Installation of Shared Roadway bicycle Markings................................................................VI-36 Table VI-17 Evaluation of Taxi Scrip Program Expansion...................VI-38 Table VI-18 Evaluation of Subsidized Car Sharing Program ................VI-41 Table VII-1 Potential Funding Sources by Project Type.....................VII-16 iv 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Introduction The South and West Berkeley Community Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) is the result of technical analysis and community outreach conducted in 2006-2007 to identify transportation needs and solutions for South and West Berkeley. The Plan was designed to advance the findings of the Metro- politan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) 2001 Lifeline Transportation Network Report and Environmental Justice Report. Both of these reports iden- tified the need to support local planning efforts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0.0 Cover January 2010.Ai
    Berkeley Pedestrian Master Plan Final Draft January 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. GOALS AND POLICIES ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 3. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING AND POLICY DOCUMENTS ............ 3-1 4. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN NETWORK ........................................................................................ 4-1 5. PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL, DEMAND AND SAFETY ............................................................ 5-1 6. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS ......................................................................................................... 6-1 7. RECOMMENDED PROGRAMS ....................................................................................................... 7-1 8. ACCESSIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 8-1 9. ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 9-1 10. IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING .................................................................................... 10-1 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 Berkeley Area Plans ............................................................................................................................ 3-6 Figure 4-1 Pedestrian Network (Northeast Quadrant) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Communications (3)
    Late Communications Planning Commission September 1, 2021 Supplemental Communications (3) (The following are communications received after 4pm on September 1.) Late Communications Planning Commission September 1, 2021 Communication From: Andrew Beahrs <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 7:48 PM To: Pearson, Alene Subject: North Berkeley BART housing now WARNING: This is not a City of Berkeley email. Do not click links or attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Commissioners: As a Berkeley homeowner I understand the desire for convenient parking at the North Berkeley and Ashby stations, which I have taken advantage of on many occasions (Ashby was my local station for a decade, and North Berkeley is now). That said, I *strongly* support immediately moving ahead with construction of transit‐friendly housing at both stations. While my preference is for affordable units, I would also love to see more market‐rate units that might play a small but real role in filling the deep need for more housing of all kinds in our region. I welcome the prospect of new, diverse neighbors renting apartments on the sites. As a community, we regularly issue statements of support in favor of respecting the value of Black lives and adapting and/or mitigating to climate change. We speak loudly of our openness to accepting refugee communities, and decry the state of homelessness in our town, region, and state. All these words are entirely empty without a willingness to build transit‐friendly housing. THIS is what we need to do; THIS is the place to do it; THIS is the time to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure RR Small Business Outreach
    Measure RR Small Business Outreach VTA River Oaks Campus Thursday, November 9, 2017 Agenda DBE Program - Small Business Elements • Measure RR Background • Measure RR Upcoming Projects • How to do business with BART • Economic Opportunity Programs • Resources • Q&A 2 Measure RR Background • $3.5B Measure RR Bond passed in 2016 to improve BART’s aging transit infrastructure: . Repair and replace critical safety infrastructure . Relieve passenger crowding, reduce traffic congestion, expand opportunities to safely access stations 3 Measure RR Upcoming Projects Program FY18* FY19* Total* Renew Track $45.9 $47.3 $93.2 Renew Power Infrastructure $85.2 $117.2 $202.4 Repair Tunnels & Structures $19.1 $25.6 $44.7 Renew Mechanical $7.0 $5.5 $12.5 Replace Train Control/Increase Capacity $5.2 $3.0 $8.2 Renew Stations $4.6 $13.6 $18.2 Expand Safe Access to Stations $14.0 $23.0 $37.0 Design/Engineer to Relieve Crowding $9.1 $14.9 $24.0 Total $190.1 $250.1 $440.2 * In millions. Represents a portion of the total project cost (RR funds only) 4 Upcoming Procurement/Construction Contract Awards Advertisement Substantial Est. Contract Project Date Completion Value ($ millions) RENEW TRACK Rail Procurement*** - 15CQ-200 FY18 – Qtr 1 FY23 – Qtr 3 $18 M03 Track Construction – 15CQ-100 FY18 – Qtr 1 FY19 – Qtr 1 $4.1 M03 Track Material FY18 – Qtr 1 FY19 – Qtr 2 $1 Rail Procurement (Frogs) – 6M3378A FY18 – Qtr 1 FY19 – Qtr 2 $0.2 A15 Portal Grout Project (DFS) FY18 – Qtr 1 FY19 – Qtr 3 $0.8 C55 Material Procurement FY18 – Qtr 2 FY19 – Qtr 3 $1.1 Wheel Rail Interface Optimize FY18 – Qtr 2 FY20 – Qtr 3 $4.9 System Joint Elimination FY18 – Qtr 2 TBD $5 C35 Interlocking Track Construction FY18 – Qtr 2 FY20 – Qtr 3 $13 Yard Track Replacement Construction FY19 – Qtr 2 TBD $200 Renew Track Sub-Total $248.1 *** Project funded by RR and other funding sources 5 UpcomingUpcoming Procurement/Construction Procurement/Construction ContractContract Awards Awards Advertisement Substantial Est.
    [Show full text]
  • BART @ 20 Series Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BART
    BART@ 20 Series Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BARTSystem Robert Cervero Alfred Round Todd Goldman Kang-Li Wu Working Paper UCTCNo. 307 TheUniversity of California TransportationCenter Universityof California Berkeley, CA94720 The University of California Transportation Center The University of California Center activities. Researchers Transportation Center (UCTC) at other universities within the is one of ten regional units region also have opportunities mandated by Congress and to collaborate with UCfaculty established in Fall 1988 to on selected studies. support research, education, and training in surface trans- UCTC’seducational and portation. The UCCenter research programs are focused serves federal Region IX and on strategic planning for is supported by matching improving metropolitan grants from the U.S. Depart- accessibility, with emphasis ment of Transportation, the on the special conditions in California Department of Region IX. Particular attention Transportation (Caltrans), and is directed to strategies for the University. using transportation as an instrument of economic Based on the Berkeley development, while also ac- Campus, UCTCdraws upon commodatingto the region’s existing capabilities and persistent expansion and resources of the Institutes of while maintaining and enhanc- Transportation Studies at ing the quality of life there. Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and Los Angeles; the Institute of The Center distributes reports Urban and Regional Develop- on its research in working ment at Berkeley; and several papers, monographs, and in academic departments at the reprints of published articles. Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and It also publishes Access, a Los Angeles campuses. magazine presenting sum- Faculty and students on other maries of selected studies. For University of California a list of publications in print, campuses may participate in write to the address below.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Access Ashby & North Berkeley BART Stations April 29, 2021
    Station Access Ashby & North Berkeley BART Stations April 29, 2021 CAG Meeting #6 Jay Primus Consulting Meeting Notices • Pursuant to Section 3 of Executive Order N‐29‐20, issued by Governor Newsom on March 17, 2020, this meeting of the City’s BART Community Advisory Group will be conducted exclusively through teleconference and Zoom video conference. Please be advised that pursuant to the Executive Order and the Shelter‐in‐Place Order, and to ensure the health and safety of the public by limiting human contact that could spread the COVID‐19 virus, there will not be a physical meeting location available. • Please be mindful that this meeting will be recorded, and all other rules of procedure and decorum will apply for the City’s BART Community Advisory Group meetings conducted by teleconference or videoconference. 1 Tonight’s Agenda Welcome and Introductions Process Refresh Policy Background Planning for Better Station Access Once New Housing is Built How Do People Currently Access the Two Stations? Q&A and Discussion #1 BART Station Access: Tradeoffs CAG Poll and Discussion/Breakout Groups #2 Next Steps Public Comment 2 Meeting Logistics + Facilitation • Via Raise Hand feature (either on computer or by dialing *9 on your phone). The meeting facilitator (Dave) will recognize you and unmute your mic. one minute per speaker • Comments received via mail or email before the meeting and through May 7 will be part of the public record and included in the meeting summary. 3 CAG Small Group Discussion: Interactive Online Feedback Padlet How‐to Guide 1) Log in to Padlet.com to access the platform and contribute.
    [Show full text]
  • AOC Weekend Terra"S Temple
    INFO FOR ART OF CIRCLING WEEKENDS AT TERRA’S TEMPLE WORKSHOP LOCATION Terra's Temple 3051 Adeline Street Berkley, CA 94703 WHAT TO BRING TO TERRA’S TEMPLE Please bring a journal, a water bottle, a mug with a lid, and wear comfortable clothes. The space has chairs, cushions, and backjacks. If you require specific seating throughout the weekend, please feel free to bring your own cushions or backjacks. You are welcome to bring a lunch and eat onsite. However, Terra's Temple does not have refrigerator space. There are a few restaurants within walking distance and many within a short drive of the venue. PARKING There is ample street parking in the area, but Terra's Temple asks that you park in the zones they have designated so as to respect their neighbors and not take all the parking spots in front of the neighbor's home. WWW.CIRCLINGINSTITUTE.COM THE CIRCLING INSTITUTE ©2014. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Also, please be careful NOT to block the driveways. Please carpool, use BART, bus and bicycles whenever possible. DIRECTIONS & TRANSPORTATION TO TERRA’S TEMPLE: Terra’s Temple is conveniently located in a popular area of Berkeley. • FROM SAN FRANCISCO — Take the CA-24 exit toward Berkeley/Walnut Creek, keep right at the fork, follow signs for Martin Luther King Junior Way and merge onto Martin Luther King Jr. Way. Continue onto Adeline St and the destination will be on the right. • FROM 101 NORTH — Take the Ashby Ave exit from I-580 E/I-80 W. Follow Ashby Ave N to Adeline St.
    [Show full text]
  • Info for Aoc Weekends at Rudramandir
    INFO FOR AOC WEEKENDS AT RUDRAMANDIR WORKSHOP LOCATION Rudramandir 830 Bancroft Way Berkeley, CA 94710 WHAT TO BRING TO RUDRAMANDIR Please bring a journal, a water bottle, a mug with a lid, and wear comfortable clothes. The space has chairs, cushions, and backjacks. If you require specific seating throughout the weekend, please feel free to bring your own cushions or backjacks. You are welcome to bring a lunch and eat onsite. However, Rudramandir does not have refrigerator space or any facilities for you to warm your food, so you may prefer to eat out. There are a few restaurants within walking distance and many within a short drive of the venue. PARKING AT RUDRAMANDIR There is ample parking in the area, but Rudramandir asks that you park in the zones they have designated so as to respect their neighbors and not take all the parking spots in front of the neighbors' homes. WWW.CIRCLINGINSTITUTE.COM THE CIRCLING INSTITUTE ©2014. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • Park directly in front of the building or on 6th Street between Bancroft Way and Addison (the block north of our building, towards University). • Park on Bancroft Way, between 6th and 4th Streets (west of 6th). • Park on 5th and 4th Streets between Channing and Addison. • PLEASE DO NOT PARK EAST OF 6TH STREET. Those streets are in a residential area and parking is reserved for our neighbors. Also, please be careful NOT to block driveways. Please carpool, use BART, bus and bicycles whenever possible. DIRECTIONS & TRANSPORTATION TO RUDRAMANDIR Rudramandir is conveniently located in a popular area of Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Info for Art of Circling Weekends at Sacred Stream
    INFO FOR ART OF CIRCLING WEEKENDS AT SACRED STREAM WORKSHOP LOCATION Sacred Stream 2149 Byron Street, Berkeley, CA 94702 - (415) 333-1434 WHAT TO BRING TO SACRED STREAM Please bring a journal, a water bottle, a mug with a lid, and wear comfortable clothes. The space has chairs, cushions, and backjacks. If you require specific seating throughout the weekend, please feel free to bring your own cushions or backjacks. Sacred Stream has fridge space available and a full kitchen for you to use, including a stove and microwave, so feel free to bring lunch. However, the venue does not provide dishes, silverware, or glassware, so if you intend to eat on site, be sure to bring your own. There are also a few restaurants within walking distance and many within a short drive of the venue. PARKING Parking is plentiful in the neighborhood around Sacred Stream. There are no time limits for parking, or parking permits required. Once per month there is street cleaning, so please check the street signs. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FROM AIRPORTS If you are flying in, the nearest airport is Oakland International Airport (OAK). From there, the convenient AirBART shuttle travels between OAK and the Coliseum/Oakland Airport BART Station every 10 minutes during the day. From the Oakland Coliseum Station, take the Richmond line to the North Berkeley BART station. (Follow ground transport directions below.) Plan your trip here: https://www.bart.gov/ WWW.CIRCLINGINSTITUTE.COM THE CIRCLING INSTITUTE ©2014. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED If you’re flying into San Francisco airport (SFO), there is BART transport into the east bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Strategy
    C H A P T E R 2 FRAMEWORK A. INTRODUCTION B. REGIONAL SETTING The purpose of this chapter is to provide the Albany is located on the east shore of San context for the chapters that follow. While the Francisco Bay approximately 12 miles northeast of eight elements of the General Plan (Chapters 3- San Francisco and six miles north of Downtown 10) each focus on a specific topic, the Framework Oakland. It is the northernmost city in Alameda chapter looks at all topics together and provides a County. The city abuts the Contra Costa County profile of Albany today. cities of Richmond on the northwest and El Cerrito on the north, the unincorporated The chapter begins with a discussion of the city’s community of Kensington on the northeast, and location and relationship to the region around it. the Alameda County city of Berkeley on the east A brief history of Albany is provided, providing and south. The western side of Albany faces San perspective for its future plans. The chapter then Francisco Bay. The city’s location is shown in presents a profile of the city’s demographics, Figure 2-1. housing stock, and economy, followed by projections for the Year 2035. These forecasts Albany is physically defined by Codornices Creek provide the basis for the General Plan on the south and Cerrito Creek on the north. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis and However, the adjacent areas are heavily urbanized policies in the Plan itself. The final section of this and the city boundaries are subtle. Land uses, chapter identifies ten guiding principles that building types, and densities are similar to those in underpin the General Plan.
    [Show full text]