The Management of Sirex Noctilio in South Africa: Standard Operating Procedures for Monitoring and Biological Control Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Management of Sirex Noctilio in South Africa: Standard Operating Procedures for Monitoring and Biological Control Operations ICFR Bulletin 05/2014 The management of Sirex noctilio in South Africa: Standard operating procedures for monitoring and biological control operations Philip Croft, Brett Hurley and Marcel Verleur This is an updated document from the original version produced as ICFR Bulletin 20/2009 Produced by the South African Sirex Control Programme and The Institute for Commercial Forestry Research (ICFR) This report has been produced by the ICFR as part of the South African Sirex Control Programme and has been peer-reviewed by this group. The recommendations contained in the ICFR Bulletin Series are based on the results of research conducted at the ICFR and reflect our current understanding of the complex inter-relationships involved. The ICFR reserves the right to subsequently modify recommendations in the light of new evidence from ongoing research and no guarantees are provided, either explicitly or by implication. The ICFR must be acknowledged whenever information contained in this document is reproduced or used in any form. © ICFR 2014 ICFR Bulletin Series 05/2014 Table of Contents Key Findings ...............................................................................................................................................................................................2 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Ibalia leucospoides – background ........................................................................................................................................................4 Monitoring Sirex .........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Determining the presence of Sirex ...................................................................................................................................................5 Monitoring using a trap network .......................................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring using trap trees ................................................................................................................................................................8 National Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................................................8 Biological Control ....................................................................................................................................................................................11 Nematode handling procedures ...................................................................................................................................................11 Inoculation procedures ...................................................................................................................................................................12 Compartment Inoculation Record .................................................................................................................................................15 Emergence cages (drums)..............................................................................................................................................................16 Ibalia leucospoides ..........................................................................................................................................................................16 Key Findings • Monitoring the movement of S. noctilio in SA has facilitated the immediate release of biological control organism enhancing control measures. • Standard Operating Procedures have produced consistent inoculation results across SA. • Monitoring S. noctilio population, tree mortality, and parasitism are key to successful management of this pest. © ICFR 2014 Page 2 Return to table of content ICFR Bulletin Series 05/2014 The management of Sirex noctilio in South Africa: Standard operating procedures for monitoring and biological control operations Philip Croft1, Brett Hurley2 and Marcel Verleur3 1 Institute for Commercial Forestry Research (ICFR), P O Box 100281, Scottsville, 3209, Pietermaritzburg, SOUTH AFRICA Email: [email protected] Telephone: +27 33 386 2314, Fax: +27 33 386 8905, www.icfr.ukzn.ac.za 2 Forestry & Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria 3 Sappi Forests, P O Box 13124, Cascades, 3202 Summary Keywords: Sirex noctilio is a woodwasp currently threatening commercial pine plantations in National monitoring South Africa. It was first detected in South Africa in the Western Cape in 1994 onPinus Emergence cages radiata. By 2002, Sirex had spread along the Southern Cape and into the Eastern Cape moving onto Pinus patula. From the Eastern Cape it moved into KwaZulu-Natal where SASCP the population exploded with high tree mortality during 2004. Currently S. noctilio has Ibalia leucospoides moved throughout the country with a handful of areas where it still remains undetected. Inoculation procedure In 2002, the South African Sirex Control Programme was formed, and today exists as a collaborative initiative of the South African Forestry Industry, in partnership with the South African National Government Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and is managed through Forestry South Africa, an association representing all timbers growers in the country. Its objective is to develop and implement a strategy to manage Sirex, by reducing the wasp population to an acceptable level thereby reducing the impact and risk to South African commercial pine plantations. The Programme’s strategic approach to manage the risk includes Biological Control (research and commercial initiatives), Monitoring, Awareness and Research to develop a knowledge base of S. noctilio. This report provides information on the standard operating procedures currently being used by the Programme for the Monitoring and Biological Control aspects. Introduction Sirex noctilio was first reported in South Africa at a timber yard been low. The only exception was an infestation in George in Port Elizabeth in 1962. However, the wasp did not become in 2002, where tree mortality was around 10% in 100 ha of 12 established in pine plantations in the area. In April 1994, to 13-year-old P. radiata. These trees were overstocked and S. noctilio was recorded at Tokai, Cape Town in Pinus radiata the infestation subsided during the course of the next year. plantations. Its initial spread was in a 90-km arc through pine In 2002, S. noctilio was detected in the Eastern Cape and plantations of this region. Sirex noctilio infestation levels in KwaZulu-Natal provinces. A variety of Pinus species were the Western Cape province of South Africa have generally infested, but mostly P. radiata in the Western Cape and © ICFR 2014 Page 3 Return to table of content ICFR Bulletin Series 05/2014 P. patula in the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal. Infestation The most successful biological control agent of S. noctilio levels in the north eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal were is the nematode Deladenus (previously Beddingia) siricidicola. substantially higher than those reported in the Eastern Cape, In 1962, D. siricidicola was discovered in New Zealand’s North with a number of compartments having over 10% annual tree Island. mortality, and some higher than 35% cumulative. In 2005, it Seven species of Beddingia have been found, parasitising was estimated that approximately 35 000 ha of pine in the some 31 Siricid species. Only Deladenus siricidicola was found Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal were infested to a mean suitable for controlling S. noctilio. Deladenus siricidicola has a level of 6%, with a total estimated value of damage being bi-cyclic life cycle and the individuals in the different phases R300 million per annum (2005). of the life cycle are morphologically distinct. In 2005, S. noctilio was found around Greytown in central • The one phase is free living and feeds exclusively on the KwaZulu-Natal. During 2007, S. noctilio females were found fungus Amylostereum areolatum. The emerging juvenile in panel traps at Vryheid and Ngome in Northern KwaZulu- nematodes start the fungus feeding phase, breed up in Natal and by 2008, as far north as Commondale on the large numbers and spread throughout the trees. The fungus border between KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga. By 2011 feeding phase can live in the tree for an indefinite period S. noctilio had moved throughout the entire country but as long as the fungus is present. remains undetected on a few localised areas. • The other phase is parasitic and feeds on the body fluids In 2002, in response to this threat, the South African Sirex of S. noctilio larvae. When juvenile mycetophagous Control Programme was formed, and today exists as a (fungus feeding) nematodes reach the microenvironment around S. noctilio larvae they are stimulated by the high collaborative initiative of the South African Forestry Industry, CO and low pH, resulting in the development of parasitic in partnership with
Recommended publications
  • The Ecology, Behavior, and Biological Control Potential of Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in North America
    REVIEW:BIOLOGICAL CONTROL-PARASITOIDS &PREDATORS The Ecology, Behavior, and Biological Control Potential of Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Woodwasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in North America 1 DAVID R. COYLE AND KAMAL J. K. GANDHI Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Environ. Entomol. 41(4): 731Ð749 (2012); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN11280 ABSTRACT Native and exotic siricid wasps (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) can be ecologically and/or economically important woodboring insects in forests worldwide. In particular, Sirex noctilio (F.), a Eurasian species that recently has been introduced to North America, has caused pine tree (Pinus spp.) mortality in its non-native range in the southern hemisphere. Native siricid wasps are known to have a rich complex of hymenopteran parasitoids that may provide some biological control pressure on S. noctilio as it continues to expand its range in North America. We reviewed ecological information about the hymenopteran parasitoids of siricids in North America north of Mexico, including their distribution, life cycle, seasonal phenology, and impacts on native siricid hosts with some potential efÞcacy as biological control agents for S. noctilio. Literature review indicated that in the hymenop- teran families Stephanidae, Ibaliidae, and Ichneumonidae, there are Þve genera and 26 species and subspecies of native parasitoids documented from 16 native siricids reported from 110 tree host species. Among parasitoids that attack the siricid subfamily Siricinae, Ibalia leucospoides ensiger (Norton), Rhyssa persuasoria (L.), and Megarhyssa nortoni (Cresson) were associated with the greatest number of siricid and tree species. These three species, along with R. lineolata (Kirby), are the most widely distributed Siricinae parasitoid species in the eastern and western forests of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Sirex Noctilio
    O R E ST E ST PE C IE S R O FIL E F P S P November 2007 Sirex noctilio Fabricius, 1793 Other scientific names: Sirex melanocerus Thomson, 1871; Paururus noctilio Order and Family: Hymenoptera: Siricidae Common names: European woodwasp; sirex; sirex woodwasp; steel-blue horntail Sirex noctilio is a major global threat to forests and the forest sector causing considerable damage and costs for control. In 1900, this pest was reported from New Zealand which represented the first time it was recorded outside of its native range. Since then it has gradually spread around the globe – to Australia in the 1960s, Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1980s, Africa in the 1990s and North America in this decade. Adult sirex woodwasps – male (L), female (R) (Photos: David R. Lance, USDA APHIS PPQ, Bugwood.org) DISTRIBUTION Native: Europe, Asia, northern Africa (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia) Introduced: Africa: South Africa (1994) Asia and the Pacific: Australia (1961), New Zealand (1900), Tasmania (1952) Latin America and the Caribbean: Argentina (1985), Brazil (1988), Chile (2001), Uruguay (1980) North America: Canada (2005), US (2004) IDENTIFICATION Eggs are cylindrical, creamy white and approximately 0.30-0.35 mm wide and 1.35-1.56 mm long (Ciesla, 2003b). Larvae are creamy white in colour, legless with a distinctive dark spine at the posterior end (TPCP, n.d.). Length varies but larvae can reach up to 30 mm in length. Adult wasps are metallic blue-black in colour with two pairs of clear yellow membranous wings, black antennae and an upturned, spear-shaped spine or plate (cornus) at the end of the abdomen (TPCP, n.d.; W alker, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environmental and Forest Biology Annual Report Summer 2016 Academic Year 2016
    Department of Environmental and Forest Biology Annual Report Summer 2016 Academic Year 2016 – 2017 Donald J. Leopold Chair, Department of Environmental and Forest Biology SUNY-ESF 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY 13210 Email: [email protected]; ph: (315) 470-6760 August 15, 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .4 Overview to Annual Report . 4 Building(s) . 6 Teaching . 6 Summary of main courses taught by faculty members . .6 Course teaching load summary by faculty members . 10 Undergraduate student advising loads . 12 Curriculum changes . 12 Undergraduate students enrolled in each EFB major . 12 Listing of awards and recognition . 13 Undergraduate Recruitment Efforts . .13 Student Learning Outcomes Assessment . .14 Research/Scholarship . .14 Summary of publications/presentations . .14 Science Citation Indices . 14 Most Cited Publication of Each EFB Faculty Member . 18 Summary of grant activity . 20 Patents and Patent Applications . 22 Listing of awards and recognition . 22 Outreach and Service . 22 Service to the department, college, and university . 22 Enumeration of outreach activities . 22 Summary of grant panel service . 23 Number of journal manuscripts reviewed by faculty. 23 Summary of journal editorial board service. 23 Listing of awards and recognition . 24 Service Learning . 24 Graduate Students. .26 Number of students by degree objectives . 26 Graduate student national fellowships/awards . 26 Graduate recruitment efforts . 26 Graduate student advising . 28 2 Courses having TA support and enrollment in each . .28 Graduate Program Accomplishments – Miscellaneous. .29 Governance and Administrative Structure . .. .29 Components. .29 Supporting offices, committees, directors, and coordinators . .30 Budget . .32 State budget allocations . .32 Funds Generated by Summer Courses and Grad Tuition Incentive Program .
    [Show full text]
  • The Sirex Woodwasp, Sirex Noctilio: Pest in North America May Be the Ecology, Potential Impact, and Management in the Southeastern U.S
    SREF-FH-003 June 2016 woodwasp has not become a major The Sirex woodwasp, Sirex noctilio: pest in North America may be the Ecology, Potential Impact, and Management in the Southeastern U.S. many insects that are competitors or natural enemies. Some of these insects compete for resources AUTHORED BY: LAUREL J. HAAVIK AND DAVID R. COYLE (e.g. native woodwasps, bark and ambrosia beetles, and longhorned beetles) while others (e.g.parasitoids) are natural enemies and use Sirex woodwasp larvae as hosts. However, should the Sirex woodwasp arrive in the southeastern U.S., with its abundant pine plantations and areas of natural pine, this insect could easily be a major pest for the region. Researchers have monitored and tracked Sirex woodwasp populations since its discovery in North America. The most common detection tool is a flight intercept trap (Fig. 2a) baited with a synthetic chemical lure that consists of pine scents (70% α-pinene, 30% β-pinene) or actual pine branches (Fig. 2b). Woodwasps are attracted to the odors given off by the lure or cut pine branches, and as they fly toward the scent they collide with the sides of the trap and drop Figure 1. The high density of likely or confirmed pine (Pinus spp.) hosts of the Sirex woodwasp suggests the southeastern U.S. may be heavily impacted should this non-native insect become into the collection cup at the bottom. established in this region. The collection cup is usually filled with a liquid (e.g. propylene glycol) that acts as both a killing agent and Overview and Detection preservative that holds the insects until they are collected.
    [Show full text]
  • And Type the TITLE of YOUR WORK in All
    TRAPPING METHODS FOR LARGE WOODBORING INSECTS IN SOUTHEASTERN U.S. FORESTS by BRITTANY FRANCES BARNES (Under the Direction of Kamal J.K Gandhi) ABSTRACT Large woodboring insects (Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Elateridae, and Siricidae) are ecologically and/or economically important in the southeastern U.S. forests. Surveys are conducted annually in the region to monitor populations of native and exotic woodboring beetle species. My research objectives were as follows: 1) to assess the efficacy of various trapping techniques for surveying of native siricids (woodwasps) and their hymenopteran parasitoids in southeastern pine (Pinus spp.) stands; and 2) to determine the effect of lure placement on modified funnel traps on capturing efficiency of large woodboring beetles. Creating trap-logs at the peak flight of siricids (early November) and using fresh pine billets with an intercept panel trap were the most efficient methods for trapping native siricids and their hymenopteran parasitoids. A modified funnel trap with lures hanging on the inside of the trap maximized the catches and diversity of cerambycid and elaterid beetles. INDEX WORDS: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Elateridae, hymenopteran parasitoids, Pinus spp., semiochemical lures, Siricidae, Southeastern U.S., trapping, woodboring insects TRAPPING METHODS FOR LARGE WOODBORING INSECTS IN SOUTHEASTERN U.S. FORESTS by BRITTANY FRANCES BARNES BSFR., University of Georgia, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2012 © 2012 Brittany Frances Barnes All Rights Reserved TRAPPING METHODS FOR LARGE WOODBORING INSECTS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN U.S. FORESTS by BRITTANY FRANCES BARNES Major Professor: Kamal J.K Gandhi Committee: Jeffrey F.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc. Distribución Potencial Del Parasitoide Ibalia Leucospoides
    Quebracho - Revista de Ciencias Forestales ISSN: 0328-0543 [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero Argentina Villacide, J. M.; Corley, J. C. Distribución potencial del parasitoide Ibalia leucospoides (Hymenoptera: Ibaliidae) en la Argentina Quebracho - Revista de Ciencias Forestales, núm. 10, diciembre, 2003, pp. 7-13 Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero Santiago del Estero, Argentina Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48101001 Abstract We used an ecoclimatic matching model (CLIMEX), to evaluate the potential distribution of the parasitoid Ibalia leucospoides in Argentina, with special emphasis on Patagonia. The species is an important agent for the biological control of the exotic woodwasp Sirex noctilio, a widely distributed pest of pine forestation in our country. The model compares de climate of 164 localities from the country with that of the region of the world from where the parasitoid is native to. For Argentina, the model predicts high ecoclimatic indices (which reflect a good match between species characteristics and local climatic conditions) for areas in which the parasitoid is actually established. This is an indication of a good match between model and field data. Generally, the country offers conditions compatible for the establishment of the parasitoid throughout, with the exception of the more arid and austral parts of Patagonia. We discuss the implications of this in the control of woodwasp populations. Keywords Ibalia leucospoides, Sirex noctilio, Climex, ecoclimatic model, distribution. How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Mortality Factors of Woodwasp Larvae in Three Northeastern United States Host Species Author(S): Kelley E
    Common Mortality Factors of Woodwasp Larvae in Three Northeastern United States Host Species Author(s): Kelley E. Zylstra and Victor C. Mastro Source: Journal of Insect Science, 12(83):1-8. 2012. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.012.8301 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1673/031.012.8301 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 12 | Article 83 Zylstra and Mastro Common mortality factors of woodwasp larvae in three northeastern United States host species Kelley E. Zylstra1a* and Victor C. Mastro2b 1U. S. Department of Agriculture, APHIS, PPQ, 374 Northern Lights Dr. North Syracuse NY 13212. [email protected] 2U. S. Department of Agriculture, APHIS, PPQ, 1398 West Truck Rd., Buzzards Bay, MA 02542.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Updates/2010/Programupdate-2010-Qtr4
    United States Department of Proceedings Agriculture 22nd U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Interagency Research Forum on Northern Research Station Invasive Species 2011 General Technical Report NRS-P-92 Joint Research and the XXII Power of Cooperation RESEARCH January 11-14, 2011 USDA Annapolis, Maryland The fi ndings and conclusions of each article in this publication are those of the individual author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service. All articles were received in digital format and were edited for uniform type and style. Each author is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her paper. The use of trade, fi rm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This publication/database reports research involving pesticides. It CAUTION: does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that PESTICIDES the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal, agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fi sh or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. COVER ARTWORK by Vincent D’Amico, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Program for the Control of the Woodwasp Sirex Noctilio F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in the Northeastern United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Proposed Program for Marketing and Regulatory the Control of the Programs Animal and Woodwasp Sirex noctilio Plant Health Inspection Service F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in the Northeastern United States Environmental Assessment, August 2008 Proposed Program for the Control of the Woodwasp Sirex noctilio F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in the Northeastern United States Environmental Assessment August 2008 Agency Contact: Lynn Evans-Goldner Emergency and Domestic Programs Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 137 Riverdale, MD 20737 __________________________________________________________ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all Its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. __________________________________________________________ Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 March 2013, 381 P
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/273257107 Mason, P. G., D. R. Gillespie & C. Vincent (Eds.) 2013. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 381 p. CONFERENCE PAPER · MARCH 2013 DOWNLOADS VIEWS 626 123 3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Peter Mason Charles Vincent Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 96 PUBLICATIONS 738 CITATIONS 239 PUBLICATIONS 1,902 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Charles Vincent Retrieved on: 13 August 2015 The correct citation of this work is: Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.). 2013. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Pucón, Chile, 4-8 March 2013, 380 p. Proceedings of the 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile March 4-8, 2013 Peter G. Mason, David R. Gillespie and Charles Vincent (Eds.) 4th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ARTHROPODS Pucón, Chile, March 4-8, 2013 PREFACE The Fourth International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, held in Pucón – Chile, continues the series of international symposia on the biological control of arthropods organized every four years. The first meeting was in Hawaii – USA during January 2002, followed by the Davos - Switzerland meeting during September 2005, and the Christchurch – New Zealand meeting during February 2009. The goal of these symposia is to create a forum where biological control researchers and practitioners can meet and exchange information, to promote discussions of up to date issues affecting biological control, particularly pertaining to the use of parasitoids and predators as biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Host Searching Decisions Made by Ibalia Leucospoides (Hymenoptera: Ibaliidae), a Parasitoid of Sirex Noctilio (Hymenoptera:Siricidae)
    J Insect Behav DOI 10.1007/s10905-011-9301-9 Food and Host Searching Decisions Made by Ibalia leucospoides (Hymenoptera: Ibaliidae), a Parasitoid of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera:Siricidae) A. L. Pietrantuono & V. Fernández-Arhex & N. Jofré & J. C. Corley Revised: 26 September 2011 /Accepted: 4 October 2011 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 Keywords Hymenopteran parasitoids . oviposition preferences . parasitoid rearing conditions . biological control . pine plantation pest management Introduction During their adult life, parasitoids—insects that lay eggs in or on other arthropods eventually killing them- spend a significant proportion of their lifetime searching for hosts, this behavior will determine their future success, simply because fitness is closely related to host encounter (Godfray 1994). However, adult parasitoids are free living animals that in most cases need to acquire food for metabolic functions such as maintenance, survival and locomotion, as well as for reproduction. Feeding on sugar-rich products or else on host fluids (i.e. host-feeding) may imply benefits in terms of future fitness, by for instance increasing egg laying opportunities through increased egg production or longevity (Chapman 1998; Speight et al. 1999). In a biological control context, providing sugar sources in the field could in some conditions, increase the efficacy of parasitoids used as natural enemies of pests (Heimpel and Jervis 2005). In the field, parasitoid foods for non-host feeding species, is found as floral and extra- floral nectar or else honeydew excretions (Heimpel et al. 1997). If food and hosts are found in different patches, a choice must be taken by foraging females which can have significant effects on parasitoid fitness and overall parasitization rates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Invasive Species Programme
    GISP The Global Invasive Species Programme CONTENTS 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 44 Pigeons 45 European Starling 3 FOREWORD 46 Monk Parakeet 47 California Quail 4 INTRODUCTION TO 48 Red-eared Slider BIOLOGICAL 49 Teiu Lizard INVASIONS 50 Giant African Snail 51 Big-headed Ant 6 INTRODUCTION 51 Little Fire Ant 52 Africanised Bee 14 SOUTH AMERICA 53 European Wasp INVADED 54 AQUATIC INVADERS 15 TREES 54 Ballast Water and Sediment 16 Pines 56 Golden Mussel 18 Acacias 58 Asian Clam 20 Chinaberry 59 Japanese Kelp 21 Japanese Cherry 60 American Bullfrog 21 Loquat 61 African Clawed Frog 22 African Oil Palm 62 Common Carp 23 Tamarisks 64 Tilapia 24 Prosopis 66 Salmonids 25 Leucaena 67 Mosquito Fish 26 SHRUBS 68 INSECT PESTS 26 Castor Oil Plant 68 Coffee Berry Borer 27 Privets 69 Cotton Boll Weevil 28 Blackberries 69 Cottony Cushion Scale 28 Japanese Honeysuckle 70 European Woodwasp 29 Rambling Roses 71 Codling Moth 30 Brooms 31 Gorse 72 SOUTH AMERICA INVADING 32 GRASSES 73 • Water Hyacinth 73 • Alligator Weed 35 ANIMALS 74 • Mile-a-minute Weed 35 Rats 74 • Chromolaena 36 American Beaver 75 • Lantana 37 Mink 75 • Brazilian Peppertree 37 Muskrat 76 • Nutria 38 European Rabbit 76 • Armoured Catfish 39 European Hare 77 • Cane Toad 39 Small Indian Mongoose 78 • Golden Apple Snail 40 Red Deer 78 • Argentine Ant 41 Feral Pigs and Wild Boar 79 • Cassava Green Mite 42 Feral Animals in Galapagos 80 • Larger Grain Borer 44 House Sparrow 80 • Leafminers PAGE 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS © The Global Invasive Species Programme First published in 2005 by the GISP Secretariat ISBN 1-919684-47-6 (Portuguese edition: ISBN 1-919684-48-4) (Spanish edition: ISBN 1-919684-49-2) GISP wants to thank our partner organisations, the World Bank and the many individuals who helped make this publication a reality, giving their time and expertise freely despite busy work schedules and other commitments.
    [Show full text]