2005 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2005 Annual Report The Urban–Brookings Tax Policy Center 2005 Annual Report Independent, timely, and accessible analyses of current and emerging tax policy issues The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037 The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036 http://www.taxpolicycenter.org CONTENTS OVERVIEW................................................................................................... 2 2005 HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................... 3 NEW PROGRAM ON STATE AND LOCAL TAXATION ....................... 5 MODEL ENHANCEMENTS........................................................................ 5 OUTREACH .................................................................................................. 6 FUNDRAISING............................................................................................. 8 KEY TPC PERSONNEL.............................................................................. 9 PUBLICATIONS, REPORTS, AND COMMENTARIES ....................... 14 TESTIMONIES ........................................................................................... 19 PUBLIC FORUMS...................................................................................... 20 REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION TABLES............................................ 20 MEDIA PLACEMENT ................................................................................ 20 1 The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center 2005 Annual Report OVERVIEW The Urban Institute–Brookings Institution policy options. TPC has become the news Tax Policy Center (TPC) was launched in media’s primary source of information on April 2002. In less than four years, it has tax policy issues. The TPC’s publications, achieved outstanding success in moving symposia, commentaries, and other out- forward on its primary mission: providing reach activities have attracted positive at- policymakers and the public with timely tention and coverage. As one example, and accessible facts and insights on press- many universities’ economics, law, and ing tax policy issues based on state-of-the- public policy programs have made the art modeling and research. Center’s research and web-based Tax Facts required reading in their curricula. The backbone of TPC’s research is “In a tax debate in which bombast and a detailed microsimulation model of the sound bites often crowd out facts, figures U.S. tax system that we built, maintain, and reasoned analysis, the Tax Policy and continue to develop. TPC analysts use Center provides all three, in an easy-to- this and other tools to estimate how tax access, easy-to-understand fashion.” proposals affect revenue, how tax burdens are distributed, and how taxes affect incen- David Wessel, Columnist, Wall Street Journal. tives to work and save. We also use the Transfer Income Model (TRIM) devel- oped at the Urban Institute to compare tax and spending alternatives. The two models The TPC staff includes several re- allow researchers to conduct timely analy- spected and internationally recognized ex- ses of current and emerging issues, as well perts (listed below) who have served at the as study longer-term policy trends and the U.S. government’s highest levels and who effects of taxes on economic decisions. earned outstanding reputations as scholars In 2005, we expanded the model to and motivators in framing the debate and include items on the tax reform agenda, stimulating discussion on tax policy. Poli- including consumption taxes (and variants, cymakers, the news media, universities, such as the so-called “flat tax”) and breaks advocacy organizations, and independent for charitable contributions and homeown- think tanks recognize the TPC as a com- ership—both of which would have been prehensive and credible source for up-to- significantly affected by tax reform. The date analysis and information on emerging model produces revenue and distribution 2 estimates that enable us to conduct cut- in June before the House of Representa- ting-edge analysis that we present in dis- tives’ Ways and Means Committee on The cussions with the media, public symposia, Impact of Tax Reform on Low- and Mid- congressional testimony, on-air commen- dle-Income Households. He confirmed that tary, an extensive electronic newsletter, tax reform would be a major accomplish- and TPC’s award winning web site. More ment if it made the tax system simpler, than 300 distribution and revenue tables fairer, and more conducive to economic generated by these models were posted on growth. Tax reform poses risks, however, our web site in 2005. Official revenue and for vulnerable populations that rely on the distribution estimates typically are not tax system for substantial income support. available and are often incomplete. The These low-income households count heav- information provided by the TPC, thus, ily on benefits received from refundable fills a critical void in research, policy, and tax credits such as the earned income tax media circles. credit (EITC) and the child tax credit (CTC). Indeed, the EITC is the largest source of cash assistance for low-income 2005 HIGHLIGHTS families, even bigger in the aggregate than In 2005, TPC researchers produced 9 dis- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families cussion papers, 7 policy briefs, and 67 (TANF) or food stamps. other publications and commentaries. The EITC and the CTC phase in These included a series of seminal papers with earnings, encouraging low-income on how changes in federal tax policy could family members to work. When legislators improve the eco- consider tax reform, it is therefore impor- nomic prospects of tant to look at the effects of eliminating or low- and middle- reducing these credits and thus devastating income working low-income households unless new spend- families. Five of the ing programs are created to provide cash Discussion Papers assistance. Leonard Burman discuss- and four of the Is- Codirector Peter R. Orszag testi- ing the consumption tax sues and Options fied before the on The NewsHour with Senate Finance Jim Lehrer, March 3, briefs show that 2005. federal tax policies Committee and that expand and argued that indi- modify the child and dependent care tax vidual accounts credit, the saver’s credit, and subsidies for can and should health insurance or that redirect home- Peter R. Orszag discuss- be strengthened ownership subsidies away from deductions ing Social Security re- as a supplement and toward capped credits for homeowner- form on The NewsHour to Social Secu- with Jim Lehrer, October ship could improve the economic well- 19, 2004. rity, rather than being, opportunities, and incentives for as a substitute. working families, especially for the mil- Orszag also examined other proposals for lions who live in urban areas. Social Security solvency. TPC scholars testified 11 times be- C. Eugene Steuerle, another TPC fore Congress and 4 times before the codirector, testified before the Senate Fi- President’s tax reform panel. For example, nance Committee’s Subcommittee on So- TPC codirector Leonard Burman testified cial Security and Family Policy in Sep- 3 tember 2005. His testimony, Charities on The TPC has become the news the Frontline and Making the Best Use of media’s primary source of information on Tax Policy to Help Them, outlined a com- bined legislative package that would en- hance incentives for charitable giving Newt Gingrich said, “‘That’s a stunning while also improving compliance meas- number’ referring to [TPC’s estimate ures and creating a better system of infor- that] half of black children … fail to re- mation reporting. At the same hearing, ceive the full credit. ‘I’d find a way to TPC codirector Bill Gale’s testimony, make sure those kids get the money’ as Charitable Giving and the Taxation of Es- part of a broader post–Hurricane Katrina tates, focused on the important role of the plan.” estate tax in encouraging charitable giving. Jason DeParle, “Study Finds Many Children Don’t Benefit from Credits,” New York Times, October 2, 2005. tax policy issues. In 2005, there were ap- proximately 350 major media article cita- tions (and countless regional pieces), in- cluding 66 citations in the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal. Jason DeParle’s October 3rd arti- cle in the New York Times, “Study Finds Many Children Don’t Benefit from Cred- its,” highlights how TPC’s research find- ings influence the sentiments of policy Gene Steuerle and Bill Gale testifying before the House Budget Committee, October 6, 2004. makers across party lines. Mr. DeParle’s article featured a recent TPC study that examined the racial disparities in the use TPC researchers are highly sought of the child tax credit, one of the tax cuts after for both their expertise and their abil- that the President argues helps low-income ity to explain complex issues in clear, families. According to the study, more comprehensible language. For example, than 25 percent of American children—50 when Alan Greenspan testified before the percent of whom are black, 47 percent tax reform panel in favor of a consumption Hispanic, and 18 percent white—do not tax, Leonard Burman and Bill Gale were fully qualify for the $1,000 per year child invited to explain the issue on Public tax credit because their family incomes are Broadcasting Service’s The NewsHour too low. According to Mr. DeParle, former with Jim Lehrer. The tax day “cover story” Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich of CBS’s Sunday Morning featured Leo- called our finding
Recommended publications
  • 06Dem Internationalen Steuerwettbewerb Begegnen
    DEM INTERNATIONALEN STEUERWETTBEWERB 06BEGEGNEN I. Motivation II. Der Tax Cuts and Jobs Act und seine Auswirkungen 1. Wesentliche Elemente der Steuerreform 2. Makroökonomische Auswirkungen der Steuerreform III. Deutschland im internationalen Steuerwettbewerb 1. Gewinnsteuersätze international im Abwärtstrend 2. Diskriminierende Besteuerung von mobilen und immobilen Aktivitäten IV. Herausforderungen bei der internationalen Besteuerung 1. Prinzipien zur Festlegung der Besteuerungsrechte 2. Besteuerung der Digitalwirtschaft als Herausforderung 3. Alternative Harmonisierungsbestrebungen V. Steuerpolitische Optionen zur Förderung privater Investitionen 1. Moderate Senkung der Steuerbelastung 2. Abbau von Verzerrungen Eine andere Meinung Literatur Dem internationalen Steuerwettbewerb begegnen – Kapitel 6 DAS WICHTIGSTE IN KÜRZE Zu Beginn des Jahres 2018 wurde in den Vereinigten Staaten mit dem Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) eine umfangreiche Steuerreform umgesetzt, die zum einen die Steuersätze auf Arbeits- und Kapi- taleinkommen deutlich reduziert hat, zum anderen die Besteuerung multinationaler Unternehmen neu ordnet. Dies ist die größte Steuerreform seit dem Tax Reform Act 1986 und dürfte sich in viel- facher Hinsicht auf die Wirtschaft in den Vereinigten Staaten auswirken. Es ist eine zusätzliche Belebung des US-amerikanischen Wirtschaftswachstums zu erwarten, was wiederum das deut- sche Wirtschaftswachstum anregen dürfte. Mit Belgien, Frankreich und Italien haben Staaten mit ehemals höheren Steuersätzen als Deutsch- land ebenfalls die Steuersätze gesenkt und weitere Senkungen angekündigt. Bei den tariflichen Gewinnsteuersätzen rückt Deutschland damit allmählich wieder an die Spitze der OECD-Länder. Die Steuertarife sind jedoch nur ein Bestandteil eines Steuersystems. Die Bemessungsgrundlage, auf die der Steuersatz angewandt wird, ist gleichermaßen von Bedeutung. In diesem Kontext wird unter dem Begriff „Smart Tax Competition“ diskutiert, inwieweit steuerliche Anreize gezielt gesetzt werden können, um bestimmte, sehr mobile Aktivitäten anzuziehen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Microsimulation Model: Documentation and Methodology for Version 0304
    The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Microsimulation Model: Documentation and Methodology for Version 0304 Jeffrey Rohaly Adam Carasso Mohammed Adeel Saleem January 10, 2005 Jeffrey Rohaly is a research associate at the Urban Institute and director of tax modeling for the Tax Policy Center. Adam Carasso is a research associate at the Urban Institute. Mohammed Adeel Saleem is a research assistant at the Urban Institute. This documentation covers version 0304 of the model, which was developed in March 2004. The authors thank Len Burman and Kim Rueben for helpful comments and suggestions and John O’Hare for providing background on statistical matching. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Urban Institute, the Brookings Institution, their boards, or their sponsors. Documentation and Methodology: Tax Model Version 0304 A. Introduction.................................................................................................................... 3 Overview................................................................................................................................. 3 History..................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Source Data .................................................................................................................... 7 SOI Public Use File ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Administrations and the Challenges of the Digital
    LISBON TAX SUMMIT TAX ADMINISTRATIONS AND THE CHALLENGES OF THE DIGITAL WORLD 24 - 26 October 2018 Lisbon, Portugal SUMMARY REPORT LISBON TAX SUMMIT TAX ADMINISTRATIONS AND THE CHALLENGES OF DIGITAL WORLD CONTENTS DAY 1 FAIR AND EFFECTIVE TAXATION ACROSS THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 2 SESSION 1 INAUGURAL SESSION 2 SESSION 2 KEYNOTES: FAIR AND EFFECTIVE TAXATION ACROSS THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 3 SESSION 3 PANEL: HOW TO TAX DIGITAL BUSINESSES - COUNTRIES EXPERIENCES 4 SESSION 4 PANEL: TAX TRANSPARENCY IN THE DIGITAL ERA 6 SESSION 5 ROUND TABLE: DIGITAL TAXATION. IMPLICATIONS, CONCERNS ON THE POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION SIDES 7 SESSION 6 ROUND TABLE: TREATMENT OF CRYPTOCURRENCIES 14 AND INITIAL COIN OFFERINGS 8 DAY 2 MAKING TAX ADMINISTRATION DIGITAL 9 SESSION 7 KEYNOTE: MAKING TAX ADMINISTRATION DIGITAL 9 SESSION 8 PANEL: GETTING CLOSER TO THE FACTS. REAL-TIME CONTROLS FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION PURPOSES 10 SESSION 9 PANEL: PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY 11 SESSION 10 PANEL: HUMAN RESOURCES & CAPACITY BUILDING 13 SESSION 11 ROUND TABLE: TAX AND CUSTOMS DIGITAL ADMINISTRATIONS 14 SESSION 12 PANEL: ADVANCED ANALYTICS FOR COMPLIANCE CONTROL 15 DAY 3 VISION OF THE FUTURE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF TAX DIGITIZATION 16 SESSION 13 KEYNOTE: VISION OF THE FUTURE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF TAX DIGITIZATION 16 SESSION 14 PANEL: NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO ENHANCE TAX COMPLIANCE AND COLLECTION 17 SESSION 15 PANEL: TAX DIGITIZATION: VIEWS AND PERSPECTIVES OF BUSINESS COMMUNITY 18 SESSION 16 ROUND TABLE: TAX ADMINISTRATION IN 10 - 15 YEARS, HOW ARE WE COPING WITH THE PACE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Policy— Unfinished Business
    37th Annual Spring Symposium and State-Local Tax Program Tax Policy— Unfinished Business Tangle of Taxes Health Policy Tax Policy and Retirement Issues in Corporate Taxation Tax Compliance Thoughts for the New Congress The Role of Federal and State Federal Impact on State Spending May 17–18, 2007 Holiday Inn Capitol Washington DC REGISTRATION — Columbia Foyer President Thursday, May 17, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM Robert Tannenwald Friday, May 18, 8:00 AM - 12:30 PM Program Chair All sessions will meet in the COLUMBIA BALLROOM Thomas Woodward Executive Director J. Fred Giertz Thursday, May 17 8:45–9:00 AM WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION 9:00–10:30 AM ROUNDTABLE: RICHARD MUSGRAVE REMEMBERED Organizer: Diane Lim Rogers, Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives Moderator: Henry Aaron, The Brookings Institution Discussants: Helen Ladd, Duke University; Wallace Oates, University of Maryland ; Joel Slemrod, University of Michigan 10:30–10:45 AM BREAK 10:45–12:15 PM TANGLES OF TAXES: PROBLEMS IN THE TAX CODE Organizer/Moderator: Roberton Williams Jr., Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Alex Brill, American Enterprise Institute — The Individual Income Tax After 2010: Post-Permanencism Ellen Harrison, Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP — Estate Planning Under the Bush Tax Cuts Leonard Burman, William Gale, Gregory Leiserson, and Jeffery Rohaly, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center — The AMT: What’s Wrong and How to Fix It Discussants: Roberta Mann, Widener University School of Law; David Weiner, Congressional Budget Office 12:30–1:45 PM LUNCHEON - DISCOVERY BALLROOM Speaker: Peter Orszag, Director, Congressional Budget Office Presentation of Davie-Davis Award for Public Service 2:00–3:30 PM HEALTH POLICY: THE ROLE FOR TAXES Organizer: Timothy Dowd, Joint Committee on Taxation Moderator: Alexandra Minicozzi, Office of Tax Analysis, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Downpayment Savings Policy That Could
    This article was downloaded by: [George Mason University] On: 27 August 2015, At: 04:02 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG Housing and Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rhas20 The little downpayment savings policy that could: revisiting building and loan societies and their products in times of the tight credit box and the pending housing finance reform Katrin Anackera a School of Policy, Government and International Affairs, 3351 Fairfax Drive, MSN 3B1, Arlington, VA 22201, USA Published online: 25 Aug 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Katrin Anacker (2015): The little downpayment savings policy that could: revisiting building and loan societies and their products in times of the tight credit box and the pending housing finance reform, Housing and Society, DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2015.1076128 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2015.1076128 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Amici Curiae Bipartisan Economic Scholars
    No. 19-840 In the Supreme Court of the United States _________ CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. TEXAS, ET AL., Respondents. _________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _________ BRIEF AMICI CURIAE FOR BIPARTISAN ECONOMIC SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS _________ SHANNA H. RIFKIN MATTHEW S. HELLMAN JENNER & BLOCK LLP Counsel of Record 353 N. Clark Street JENNER & BLOCK LLP Chicago, IL 60654 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 639-6000 May 13, 2020 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .................................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 5 I. The Fifth Circuit’s Severability Analysis Lacks Any Economic Foundation And Would Cause Egregious Harm To Those Currently Enrolled In Medicaid And Private Individual Market Insurance As Well As Health Care Providers. ....................................................................... 5 A. Economic Data Establish That The ACA Markets Can Operate Without The Mandate. ................................................................... 5 B. There Is No Economic Reason Why Congress Would Have Wanted The Myriad Other Provisions In The ACA To Be Invalidated. ....................................................... 10 II. Because The ACA Can Operate Effectively Without
    [Show full text]
  • HAMILTON Achieving Progressive Tax Reform PROJECT in an Increasingly Global Economy Strategy Paper JUNE 2007 Jason Furman, Lawrence H
    THE HAMILTON Achieving Progressive Tax Reform PROJECT in an Increasingly Global Economy STRATEGY PAPER JUNE 2007 Jason Furman, Lawrence H. Summers, and Jason Bordoff The Brookings Institution The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by making economic growth broad-based, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy—strikingly different from the theories driving economic policy in recent years—calls for fiscal discipline and for increased public investment in key growth- enhancing areas. The Project will put forward innovative policy ideas from leading economic thinkers throughout the United States—ideas based on experience and evidence, not ideology and doctrine—to introduce new, sometimes controversial, policy options into the national debate with the goal of improving our country’s economic policy. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first treasury secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Consistent with the guiding principles of the Project, Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. THE Advancing Opportunity, HAMILTON Prosperity and Growth PROJECT Printed on recycled paper. THE HAMILTON PROJECT Achieving Progressive Tax Reform in an Increasingly Global Economy Jason Furman Lawrence H. Summers Jason Bordoff The Brookings Institution JUNE 2007 The views expressed in this strategy paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of The Hamilton Project Advisory Council or the trustees, officers, or staff members of the Brookings Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Individual Income Tax Rates, Standard Deductions, Personal Exemptions, and Filing Thresholds
    15-Oct-15 2016 Individual Income Tax Rates, Standard Deductions, Personal Exemptions, and Filing Thresholds If your filing status is Single If your filing status is Married filing jointly Taxable Income Taxable Income But not But not Over --- over --- Marginal Rate Over --- over --- Marginal Rate $0 $9,275 10% $0 $18,550 10% $9,275 $37,650 15% $18,550 $75,300 15% $37,650 $91,150 25% $75,300 $151,900 25% $91,150 $190,150 28% $151,900 $231,450 28% $190,150 $413,350 33% $231,450 $413,350 33% $413,350 $415,050 35% $413,350 $466,950 35% $415,050 and over 39.6% $466,950 and over 39.6% If your filing status is Married filing If your filing status is Head of Household separately Taxable Income Taxable Income But not But not Over --- over --- Marginal Rate Over --- over --- Marginal Rate $0 $13,250 10% $0 $9,275 10% $13,250 $50,400 15% $9,275 $37,650 15% $50,400 $130,150 25% $37,650 $91,150 25% $130,150 $210,800 28% $91,150 $190,150 28% $210,800 $413,350 33% $190,150 $413,350 33% $413,350 $441,000 35% $413,350 $441,000 35% $441,000 and over 39.6% $441,000 and over 39.6% Standard Deduction Standard Deduction for Dependents Standard Blind/Elderly Greater of $1000 or sum of $350 and Single $6,300 $1,550 individual's earned income Married filing jointly $12,600 $1,250 Personal Exemption $4,050 Head of Household $9,300 $1,550 Married filing Threshold for Refundable separately $6,300 $1,250 Child Tax Credit $3,000 Filing Threshold Number of Blind / Elderly Exemptions 0 1 2 3 4 Single 10,350 11,900 13,450 Head of Household 13,350 14,900 16,450 Married
    [Show full text]
  • Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
    Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) BEPS Action 7 Additional Guidance on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments 4 October 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS AFME and UK Finance .................................................................................................................. 5 Andrew Cousins & Richard Newby ............................................................................................... 8 Andrew Hickman ............................................................................................................................ 13 ANIE (Federazione Nazionale Imprese Elettrotecniche ed Elettroniche) ....................................... 19 Association of British Insurers ....................................................................................................... 22 BDI ...... .......................................................................................................................................... 24 BDO...... .......................................................................................................................................... 26 BEPS Monitoring Group ................................................................................................................ 29 BIAC ... .......................................................................................................................................... 47 BusinessEurope .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Stimulus Options in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attack
    TAX STIMULUS OPTIONS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE TERRORIST ATTACK By William Gale, Peter Orszag, and Gene Sperling William Gale is the Joseph A. Pechman Senior outlook thus suggests the need for policies that Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institu- stimulate the economy in the short run. The budget tion. Peter Orszag is Senior Fellow in Economic outlook suggests that the long-run revenue impact Studies at the Brookings Institution. Gene Sperling is of stimulus policies should be limited, so as to avoid Visiting Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings exacerbating the nation’s long-term fiscal challen- Institution, and served as chief economic adviser to ges, which would raise interest rates and undermine President Clinton. The authors thank Henry Aaron, the effectiveness of the stimulus. Michael Armacost, Alan Auerbach, Leonard Burman, In short, say the authors, the most effective Christopher Carroll, Robert Cumby, Al Davis, Eric stimulus package would be temporary and maxi- Engen, Joel Friedman, Jane Gravelle, Robert mize its “bang for the buck.” It would direct the Greenstein, Richard Kogan, Iris Lav, Alice Rivlin, Joel largest share of its tax cuts toward spurring new Slemrod, and Jonathan Talisman for helpful discus- economic activity, and it would minimize long-term sions. The opinions expressed represent those of the revenue losses. This reasoning suggests five prin- authors and should not be attributed to the staff, of- ciples for designing the most effective tax stimulus ficers, or trustees of the Brookings Institution. package: (1) Allow only temporary, not permanent, In the aftermath of the recent terrorist attacks, the items.
    [Show full text]
  • In Fed We Trust
    IN FED WE TRUST BEN BERNANKE’S WAR ON THE GREAT PANIC DAVID WESSEL N Wess_9780307459688_3p_all_r4.indd v 6/25/09 11:57:57 AM Copyright © 2009 by David Wessel All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Crown Business, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. www.crownpublishing.com CROWN BUSINESS is a trademark and CROWN and the Rising Sun colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. Author photograph copyright © 2009 by Jay Mallin. All rights reserved. Licensed solely for publicity and book-jacket use in conjunction with In Fed We Trust by David Wessel, publication August 2009. All other reproduction, distribution, or publication prohibited. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available upon request. I S B N 9 7 8 - 0 - 3 0 7 - 4 5 9 6 8 - 8 Printed in the United States of America Design by Gabriel Levine 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N First Edition Wess_9780307459688_3p_all_r4.indd vi 6/25/09 11:57:57 AM Introduction WHATEVER IT TAKES t the beginning of October 2008, after some of the toughest weeks of A the Great Panic, the lines in Ben Bernanke’s face and the circles under his eyes offered evidence of more than a year of seven- day weeks and confer- ence calls that stretched past midnight. Sometimes all that seemed to keep Bernanke going was the constantly restocked bowl of trail mix that sat on his secretary’s desk and the cans of diet Dr Pepper from the refrigerator in his offi ce.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Administration
    Business Economics 501 A/B and C/D Analysis of Global Economic Conditions WINTER 2021 SYLLABUS Prof. Debra Glassman Office Hours: e-mail: [email protected] Wednesday, 4:00-5:00 TA: Zihao (Darwin) Chen ([email protected]) and by appointment Course Description This course examines the macroeconomic environment in which firms operate. The goal is for you to understand how macroeconomic forces and policies affect the overall health of a nation’s economy and hence the business decisions that you make. The course will give you the tools to understand the key drivers of economic growth, inflation, unemployment, business cycles, fiscal policy, monetary policy, and trade policy, both in the US and in other countries. Course Learning Objectives: The course will help you to: ★ Explain what the headlines do and do not tell us about macroeconomic statistics such as GDP growth, inflation, and unemployment. ★ Understand the press releases from the Federal Reserve’s policy-making committee. ★ Follow debates about the size of the government budget deficit and government debt. ★ Compare and contrast current macroeconomic policies in the US with policies in other major countries and regions, such as China, Japan and the Eurozone. Remote Instruction Class Format The course will have live zoom sessions for 1.5 hours at the scheduled class times (login information will be posted on Canvas under the Zoom link). Following the lecture, Prof. Glassman will stay online for informal Q&A. Zoom sessions will be recorded, and recordings will be available on Canvas (with a delay) under “Panopto Recordings”. Warning: sometimes technical issues make recordings incomplete.
    [Show full text]