2013 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2013 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard 2013 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD FIRST SESSION OF THE 113TH CONGRESS LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org LCV Board Of directors * John H. Adams George T. Frampton, JR. Reuben Munger Natural Resources Defense Council Covington & Burling, LLP Vision Ridge Partners, LLC Paul Austin Wade Greene, Honorary Scott A. Nathan, CHAIR Conservation Minnesota & Conservation Rockefeller Family & Associates The Baupost Group, LLC Minnesota Voter Center Rampa R. Hormel Bill Roberts Brent Blackwelder, Honorary Enlyst Fund Corridor Partners, LLC Friends of the Earth John Hunting, Honorary Larry Rockefeller The Honorable Sherwood L. John Hunting & Associates American Conservation Association Boehlert, Vice Chair Tom Kiernan, Treasurer Theodore Roosevelt IV, The Accord Group American Wind Energy Association Honorary Chair The honorable carol browner Michael Kieschnick Barclays Capital Center for American Progress CREDO Mobile Laura Turner Seydel Marcia Bystryn, Secretary Peter Mandelstam Turner Foundation New York League of Conservation Voters Trip Van Noppen Pete Maysmith Brendon Cechovic Earthjustice Conservation Colorado Western Conservation Foundation Kathleen Welch WInsome mcintosh, honorary Carrie Clark Corridor Partners, LLC The McIntosh Foundation North Carolina League of Conservation Voters William H. Meadows III Manny Diaz The Wilderness Society Lydecker Diaz LCV IssuEs & Accountability Committee * Brent Blackwelder Ruth Hennig Trip Van Noppen Friends of the Earth The John Merck Fund Earthjustice The honorable carol browner Reuben Munger Wesley Warren Center for American Progress Vision Ridge Partners, LLC Natural Resources Defense Council Marcia Bystryn New York League of Conservation Voters LCV scorecard Advisory Committee * CAROL ANDRESS JESSICA FEINGOLD-LIEBERSON MELINDA PIERCE Environmental Defense Fund The Humane Society of the United States Sierra Club ANNA AURILIO EDIE GILLISS ALAN ROWSOME Environment America Washington Conservation Voters The Wilderness Society GEOFFREY BROWN MARTY HAYDEN JOSHUA SAKS The Pew Charitable Trusts Earthjustice National Wildlife Federation MARCIA BYSTRYN DAVID JENKINS BEN SCHREIBER New York League of Conservation Voters Conservatives for Responsible Stewardship Friends of the Earth ROBERT COWIN CRAIG LASHER KERRY SCHUMANN Union of Concerned Scientists Population Action International Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters ROBERT DEWEY ELISE RUSSELL LIGUORI CINDY SHOGAN Defenders of Wildlife National Parks Conservation Association Alaska Wilderness League MAUREEN DROUIN BRIAN MOORE SCOTT SLESINGER Maine League of Conservation Voters National Audubon Society Natural Resources Defense Council * Organizations are shown for identification purposes only he nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has CONTENTS published a National Environmental Scorecard every Con- gress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders of the 1. ANALYSIS environmental movement following the first Earth Day. TLCV works to turn environmental values into national priorities. Overview of the 1st This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objec- Session of the 113th tive, factual information about the most important environmental legis- Congress 2 lation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members Voting Summary 4 of the first session of the 113th Congress. This Scorecard represents the consensus of experts from about 20 respected environmental and con- servation organizations who selected the key votes on which members of 2. SENATE SCORES Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most important issues of the year, including energy, climate change, public health, public lands Vote Descriptions 8 and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The Senate Votes 12 votes included in this Scorecard presented members of Congress with a real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environ- mental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes 3. HOUSE SCORES consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded Vote Descriptions 19 votes occurred. Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their House Votes 28 time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Score- card Advisory Committee for their valuable input. Cover photo of the federal government shutdown sign by David P. Fulmer. 20052013 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW There is a jarring disconnect between the frightening climate change developments of 2013 and the re- sults of the 2013 National Environmental Scorecard. As the scientific consensus around climate change and its impacts only solidified, climate change deniers ramped up their rhetoric, pushed harmful leg- islation that would exacerbate the climate crisis, and blocked all efforts to address it. Indeed, the first session of the 113th Congress is widely acknowledged to be one of the least productive and most dysfunctional in our nation’s history and will likely be best remembered for shutting down the govern- ment. In stark contrast to the congressional denial and dysfunction that ran rampant in 2013, President Obama made significant progress in addressing the climate crisis through executive action. This Scorecard comes on the heels of another record- For the third year in a row, there is an unusually high breaking year of global climate change impacts, ranking number of House votes included in the Scorecard, due to as one of the five hottest years ever recorded, replete with the breadth and depth of anti-environmental legislation perilous extreme weather, including stronger storms, more brought to the House floor in 2013. The 2013 Scorecard intense wildfires, and longer droughts. In the U.S. alone, includes 28 House votes, which is second only to the re- there were seven separate weather and climate disasters cord 35 votes included in both 2011 and 2012, the most in 2013 with price tags exceeding $1 billion. In May, the anti-environmental U.S. House of Representatives in his- planet hit an alarming milestone when the concentration tory. Many other votes warranted inclusion and would of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere passed 400 parts per have been included in a typical year. million, the highest level in human history. Just as they did in the 112th Congress, the House seem- Despite this reality, the U.S. House of Representatives ingly left no issue untouched during the first session of the continued its unprecedented assault on the environment 113th Congress. The attacks included efforts to: roll back and public health that began during the 112th Congress. cornerstone environmental laws like the Clean Air Act, Although Congress started 2013 with votes to provide di- the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Pol- saster relief in the wake of Hurricane Sandy, it’s painfully icy Act; legislatively approve the risky Keystone XL tar clear that far too many members failed to heed the les- sands pipeline and increase harmful drilling and fracking sons offered by that tragic storm. Indeed, this Scorecard across the country; decimate protections for our forests is a disturbing reflection of the extent to which the Re- and other public lands; continue subsidizing dirty fos- publican leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives sil fuels while cutting funding for renewable energy and continues to be controlled by Tea Party climate change energy efficiency; and deny the costs of carbon pollution deniers with an insatiable appetite for attacks on the envi- despite the fact that they are already all too apparent. ronment and public health. The good news once again is the U.S. Senate and the Obama administration blocked the vast majority of 2 scorecard.lcv.org | 2013 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV House-passed attacks on the environment and public while the Dirty Dozen members had an average lifetime health. With bipartisan votes, the Senate rejected anti- score of just 12 percent. Another reason for optimism is 1. An environmental riders to prevent the Environmental Pro- that more and more members of Congress are speaking tection Agency from protecting public health by cutting out on the urgent need to address climate change. Many A lysis carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act and to gut the have joined congressional caucuses and task forces cre- Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. Also along biparti- ated specifically to tackle climate change, and they are san lines, the Senate confirmed Sally Jewel as Secretary speaking out – on the House and Senate floor, in the me- of the Department of the Interior and Gina McCarthy as dia, and in their districts and states. Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Building on the significant accomplishments of his first (although despite being highly qualified, McCarthy had term, President Obama also spoke out and led more pow- to answer a record 1100 written questions and wait more erfully than ever in 2013. After eloquent remarks on the than 100 days to be confirmed). urgent need to address climate change in both his inaugu- The fact that the Scorecard includes just 13 Senate ral speech and his State of the Union, President Obama votes is testament to the stalwart leadership of Senator laid out his commonsense and ambitious Climate Action Reid (D-NV), who successfully prevented many of the Plan on June 25. At the center of that plan are EPA rules House’s most egregious attacks from coming to the Sen- to cut carbon pollution
Recommended publications
  • 2010 Election Protection Report
    2010 Election Protection Report Partners Election Protection would like to thank the state and local partners who led the program in their communities. The success of the program is owed to their experience, relationships and leadership. In addition, we would like to thank our national partners, without whom this effort would not have been possible: ACLU Voting Rights Project Electronic Frontier Foundation National Coalition for Black Civic Participation Advancement Project Electronic Privacy Information Center National Congress of American Indians AFL-CIO Electronic Verification Network National Council for Negro Women AFSCME Fair Elections Legal Network National Council of Jewish Women Alliance for Justice Fair Vote National Council on La Raza Alliance of Retired Americans Generational Alliance National Disability Rights Network American Association for Justice Hip Hop Caucus National Education Association American Association for People with Hispanic National Bar Association Disabilities National Voter Engagement Network Human Rights Campaign American Bar Association Native American Rights Fund IMPACT American Constitution Society New Organizing Institute Just Vote Colorado America's Voice People for the American Way Latino Justice/PRLDEF Asian American Justice Center Leadership Conference on Civil and Project Vote Asian American Legal Defense and Human Rights Rainbow PUSH Educational Fund League of Women Voters Rock the Vote Black Law Student Association League of Young Voters SEIU Black Leadership Forum Long Distance Voter Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • March 10, 2016
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: AN INQUIRY INTO THE STATE CASE NO. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND 2016·00059 ORDER On February 1, 2016, the Commission, on its own motion, initiated this administrative proceeding to investigate the current and future funding, distribution, and administration of the Kentucky Universal Service Fund ("KUSF") , which provides supplemental support for authorized telecommunications carriers that also participate in the federal Lifeline program. The Commission stated that the need for the investigation arose from the projected depletion of the KUSF by April 2016, at which time the fund will no longer be able to meet its monthly obligation, absent action to increase funding or reduce spending. The Commission named as parties the Attorney General's office; all Local Exchange Carriers; all commercial mobile radio service providers; and all eligible telecommunications carriers, and established a procedural schedule providing for the filing of testimony by parties, discovery, and an opportunity for a hearing. In initiating this investigation, the Commission's February 1, 2016 Order cited the need to maintain the solvency of the KUSF and proposed to either temporarily raise the KUSF per-line surcharge from $0.08 to $0.14 or to temporarily lower the amount of state support. Any comments addressing either proposal were required to be filed no later than February 22, 2016. The Commission received a total of nine joint and/or individual comments from the parties to the case, as well as three comments from members of the public. Four joint and/or individual comments 1 expressed support for the Commission's proposal to temporarily raise the per-line monthly surcharge from $0.08 to $0.14.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 National Environmental Scorecard First Session of the 114Th Congress
    2015 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD FIRST SESSION OF THE 114TH CONGRESS LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS scorecard.lcv.org LCV BOARD OF DIRECTORS * JOHN H. ADAMS GEORGE T. FRAMPTON, JR. REUBEN MUNGER Natural Resources Defense Council Covington & Burling, LLP Vision Ridge Partners, LLC PAUL AUSTIN WADE GREENE, HONORARY BILL ROBERTS Conservation Minnesota & Rockefeller Family & Associates Corridor Partners, LLC Conservation Minnesota Voter Center RAMPA R. HORMEL LARRY ROCKEFELLER BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARY Enlyst Fund American Conservation Association Friends of the Earth JOHN HUNTING, HONORARY THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. John Hunting & Associates HONORARY CHAIR BOEHLERT MICHAEL KIESCHNICK Barclays Capital The Accord Group CREDO Mobile KERRY SCHUMANN THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, MARK MAGAÑA Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters CHAIR GreenLatinos LAURA TURNER SEYDEL Center for American Progress PETE MAYSMITH Turner Foundation BRENDON CECHOVIC Conservation Colorado TRIP VAN NOPPEN Western Conservation Foundation WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARY Earthjustice CARRIE CLARK The McIntosh Foundation KATHLEEN WELCH North Carolina League of Conservation Voters WILLIAM H. MEADOWS III Corridor Partners, LLC MANNY DIAZ The Wilderness Society REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOOD Lydecker Diaz Hip Hop Caucus LCV ISSUES & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE * BRENT BLACKWELDER RUTH HENNIG KERRY SCHUMANN Friends of the Earth The John Merck Fund Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER MARK MAGAÑA TRIP VAN NOPPEN Center for American
    [Show full text]
  • The JOBS Act Weakens Investor Protections, Undermines Market Transparency, and Will Increase the Cost of Capital
    Experts Agree: The JOBS Act weakens investor protections, undermines market transparency, and will increase the cost of capital. It is a JOBS Act in name only. To fix this deeply flawed bill: Vote YES on cloture for Reed-Landrieu-Levin Amendment Vote NO on cloture for the House bill if the amendment fails to pass Two weeks ago, the House gave bipartisan approval to a JOBS Act that is opposed by a growing number of current and former securities regulators, investors, consumer groups, unions, seniors, market experts and legal scholars because it would undermine important investor protections without promoting meaningful, sustainable job growth. Opponents of the House bill are looking to the Senate to adopt a more balanced and thoughtful approach, one that narrowly targets legitimate barriers to capital formation without taking a hatchet to regulations that are essential to protecting investors and promoting the transparency and integrity of our capital markets. The Reed-Landrieu-Levin substitute amendment offers that more balanced approach, providing regulatory relief in each of the areas addressed in the House bill, but without eviscerating investor protections in the process. Senators who care about investor protection must vote YES on the Reed-Landrieu-Levin amendment and, if it fails to garner the 60 votes necessary to invoke cloture, vote NO on cloture for the dangerous and damaging JOBS Act. Below is a sampling of recent articles that highlight the legislation’s many flaws and explain why so many different groups and individuals have come out in opposition. Please contact CFA Director of Investor Protection Barbara Roper ([email protected], cell: 719-569-9159, office: 719-543-9468) if you have any questions about our position on the legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Sky * Advocates for Environmental Human Rights * Alabama
    1Sky * Advocates for Environmental Human Rights * Alabama Environmental Council Alabama First * Alabama Rivers Alliance * Alaska Community Action on Toxics * Altamaha Riverkeeper * American Bottom Conservancy * American Rivers * Appalachia - Science in the Public Interest * Appalachian Center For the Economy and the Environment * Appalachian Voices * Arkansas Public Policy Center * Assateague Coastal Trust * B.E. Cause Group * Black Warrior Riverkeeper * Blackwater Nottoway Riverkeeper Program * Bristlecone Alliance * Cahaba Riverkeeper * Carbon Action Alliance * Carrie Dickerson Foundation * Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation, Inc. * Center for Biological Diversity * Center for Coalfield Justice * Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies * Center for Energy Matters * Center for Healthy Environments and Communities * Chattooga Conservancy * Chesapeake Climate Action Network * Citizens Against Longwall Mining * Citizens Against Ruining the Environment * Citizens' Environmental Coalition * Citizens for Clean Power * Citizens for Dixie's Future * Citizen Power * Citizen Advocates United to Safeguard the Environment, Inc. * Citizens Coal Council * Civil Society Institute * Clean Air Carolina * Clean Air Council * Clean Air Task Force * Clean Air Watch * Clean Power Now * Clean Water Action * Clean Water for North Carolina * Clean Wisconsin * Coal River Mountain Watch * Coastal Conservation League * Coastal Women for Change * Concerned Citizens of Giles County * Congaree Riverkeeper * Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Down the Tea Party Ten a Leftist Super PAC Smears Conservatives to Safeguard “Progressive Change” by Matthew Vadum and Charles Dickenson
    Stopping Juvenile Detention: Taking Down the Tea Party Ten A Leftist Super PAC Smears Conservatives To Safeguard “Progressive Change” By Matthew Vadum and Charles Dickenson Summary: Using its for-profi t business to generate left-wing political donations, Credo/Working Assets has launched a new campaign aimed at unelecting 11 (not 10) Tea Party members of Congress. Even as the group protested super PACs, it formed a super PAC of its own to accomplish this goal. ut-of-control government spend- ing, a crushing national debt, op- Opressive anti-business regulations, a stagnant economy, the very existence of the country—none of these things are important to Credo Super PAC. The far-left political action committee is focused instead on de- feating prominent Congressmen associated with the Tea Party, the grassroots movement that sprang up in opposition to Washington’s socialist juggernaut. Tea Party star Michele Bachmann is the only woman targeted by Credo Super PAC. Community organizer Becky Bond, president Party wave in 2010 that was funded of Credo Super PAC, described the commit- on just buckets of super PAC money tee’s mission: from the Koch brothers and from October 2012 people like Karl Rove. And we’ve For over 25 years Credo has been seen a lot of history, and we know CONTENTS involved in progressive politics. this is bad. And as good people of We’ve been fi ghting former House conscience, we’ve decided that Speaker Newt Gingrich since the Taking Down the Tea Party Ten we need to strike back, and it’s Page 1 mid ’90s, and we’ve been pushing time to fi ght back, and we need to for progressive change.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Rimmer Professor of Intellectual Property and Innovation Law Faculty of Law Queensland University of Technology
    AUGUST 2016 ROCK AGAINST THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP: COPYRIGHT LAW, THE CREATIVE INDUSTRIES, AND INTERNET FREEDOM DR MATTHEW RIMMER PROFESSOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INNOVATION LAW FACULTY OF LAW QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Queensland University of Technology 1 Executive Summary This submission provides a critical analysis of the copyright sections of Chapter 18 of the Trans-Pacific Partnership on intellectual property. In National Interest Analysis, the Australian Government asserts that the Trans-Pacific Partnership is a merely capitulation of existing agreements: The TPP Intellectual Property Chapter is consistent with Australia’s existing intellectual property regime and will not require any changes to Australia’s legislation. Minor regulatory changes relating to encoded broadcasts will be required to extend to Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand the benefits in Part VAA of the Copyright Act 1968 that Australia already extends to parties to the International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations 1961 (the Rome Convention). The TPP does not require an increase in the term of copyright protection in Australia, nor any other changes to Australia’s copyright regime, including with respect to technological protection measures. The TPP standard with respect to ISPs is consistent with Australia’s existing ISP liability regime and will not require ISPs to monitor, report or penalise copyright infringement. However, such an assertion is not well-founded. A close examination of the Trans-Pacific Partnership reveals that the agreement has obligations above and beyond existing agreements – such as the TRIPS Agreement 1994 and the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentencing Times a Publication of the Sentencing Project, Washington, D.C
    RESEARCH ADVOCACY POLICY OUTREACH PROFILES Sentencing Times A publication of The Sentencing Project, Washington, D.C. Fall 2009 POLICY INSIDE Interview with National Crack equalization bill passes in Public Radio.....................2 House Judiciary Sentencing Project steps up state focus ........4 The prospects for significant reform to the Marc Mauer federal crack cocaine sentencing policies speaks with Public Education............ .4 Congressman improved dramatically over the summer, Danny Davis, Supreme Court to when a bill that would equalize the penalties at the "Rethinking consider juvenile life for powder and crack cocaine offenses passed Federal Sentencing without parol e................ .5 out of the House Judiciary Committee. The Symposium" reform bill, HR 3245, was introduced by in June. Federal voting rights Congressman Bobby Scott, Chairman of the Obama’s transition committee identified act introduced ................ .5 Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and eliminating the “100 to 1” drug quantity Life sentences examined Homeland Security. disparity between crack and powder cocaine in new report ................. ..6 Since this historic vote, advocates have offenses as a top civil rights priority. been expecting Senate Judiciary Subcommittee The disparity results from a penalty Quoting The Sentencing Chairman Dick Durbin of Illinois to introduce structure in which the amount of the drug Project................. ..............6 a bipartisan bill in the Senate to reform the involved in an offense triggers a five- or ten-year mandatory minimum prison Donor Profile: current penalties. sentence. Thus, an offense involving just Rachel Porter................. ...7 “After two decades of watching the devas - tating effects of the racially biased, excessive 5 grams of crack cocaine results in the same Race and justice federal sentences for low-level crack cocaine five-year prison term as one involving 500 information clearing- offenses, we are beginning to see the light at grams of powder cocaine.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013 No. 70 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, May 20, 2013, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013 The House met at 9 a.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. Speaker, I will move an amend- called to order by the Speaker. The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman ment when the National Defense Au- thorization Act comes to the House f from California (Mr. MCNERNEY) come forward and lead the House in the floor that will direct the Secretary of PRAYER Pledge of Allegiance. Defense to determine what the current Mr. MCNERNEY led the Pledge of Al- excess capacity is so that we will know The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick legiance as follows: the potential savings from doing an- J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: other Base Realignment and Closure Loving and gracious God, we give I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Repub- Commission. You thanks for giving us another day. lic for which it stands, one nation under God, I support the administration and its Help us this day to draw closer to indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. call for another Base Realignment and You so that, with Your Spirit and f Closure Commission in 2015. Every dol- aware of Your presence among us, we lar wasted in the Defense budget is a ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER may all face the tasks of this day.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Info TC86
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. RECEIVED NOV 2 6 2012 ) In the Matter of ) SOUTH DAKOTA P.lJBLlC Section 63.71 Application of ) File No. UTILITIES COMMISSION Working Assets Funding Service, Inc. offered as ) Working Assets Business Long Distance ) ) For Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of ) The Conununications Act of 1934, as Amended, ) To Discontinue the Provision of Service ) ----------------------~----) SECTION 63.71 APPLICATION OF WORKING ASSETS FUNDING SERVICE, INC. OFFERED AS WORKING ASSETS BUSINESS LONG DISTANCE Working Assets Funding Service, Inc. offered as Working Assets Business Long Distance ("Working Assets") submits this Application fcir authority under Section 214(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 63.71 of the Conunission's rules, to discontinue its resold business long distance service (including toll-free service) to approximately 854 business customers whose services are supported by a billing platform that Working Assets intends to decommission. Effective December 31,2012, when the billing platform is decommissioned, affected business customers will no longer receive business long distance service (including toll-free service) from Working Assets. Pursuant to Sections 63.71 (a) and (b) of the Conunission's rules, Working Assets provides the following information: 1. Name and Address of Carrier (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.71(a)(1), (b)(2)): Working Assets Funding Service, Inc: offered as Working Assets Business Long Distance 703962457vl I 0 I Market Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94105 2. Date of Planned Service Discontinnance (47 C.F.R. §§ 63.71(a)(2), (b)(2)): · Subject to the Commission's authorization to discontinue service pursuant to Section 63.71(c) of the Commission's rules, effective December 31,2012, Working Assets will cease providing business long distance service (including toll-free service) to affected business customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Membership
    Campaign Membership – Total 1086 organizations National Organizations (150) 9 to 5, National Association of Working Women Every Child Matters Education Fund Abundant Children and Family Services Future Majority ACORN Gamaliel Adventists Community Services Generational Alliance AFL-CIO Health Care for the 21st Century Consulting AIDS Action Healthcare United Alliance for Retired Americans Hispanic Federation American Academy of Family Physicians HIV Medicine Association American Academy of Nursing Holman Healthcare Consulting American Academy of Pediatrics Hope for Hepatitis C American Family Voices Human Rights Campaign (HRC) American Federation of State, County and Municipal International Federation of Black Prides, Inc. Employees Jobs With Justice American Federation of Television and Radio Artists Latinos for National Health Insurance American Federation of Teachers (AFT) Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR) Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) American Medical Student Association Midwest Academy American Nurses Association Moms for Universal Health Care on cafemom.com Americans United for Change MoveOn.org AskSlim.org Muscular Dystrophy Foundation for Independent Living Asian and Pacific Islander American Health Forum My Rural America (Action Fund) Association for Better Insulation National Abortion Federation Association for Clinicians for the Underserved National Alliance on Mental Illness Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric & Neonatal Nurses National Alliance of Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Interlocking Issues for Pence, Assembly
    V18, N26 Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013 Interlocking issues for Pence, Assembly What became clear after a series of press avail- Issues of tax cuts, budget, abilities Wednesday was that the Pence income tax is at the mercy of the economy and sequestration, as well as sequestration and Medicaid the biennial budget, which in turn is interlocked with the begging for elusive answers prospect of Medicaid expansion, which in turn is bound by an emphatically hostile political attitude toward President By BRIAN A. HOWEY Obama and the Affordable Care Act, which, in reality, is the INDIANAPOLIS – With an array of historic, billion- law of the land. dollar questions hanging in the balance, and a gnawing The inescapable murmur in the marble Statehouse realization that the answers are increasingly elusive, the hallways is the potential of a Pence presidential run in Indiana General Assembly and Gov. Mike Pence arrived at the halfway calendar point this week. Continued on page 3 The Sequester firing line By MARK SCHOEFF JR. WASHINGTON – When $85 billion worth of au- tomatic spending cuts begin to take effect on Friday, the Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center ‘‘No. 1 is stop the drama, please. in southern Indiana will be in the fir- ing line. Stop the constant last-day The base will take a legislating. No. 2 is we $36-million hit to its budget between now and Sept. 30, when the first cannot continue to spend what round of the so-called sequester concludes, according to Democratic we don’t have.” Sen. Joe Donnelly. It’s part of the - U.S.
    [Show full text]