DOCSLIB.ORG

Five-Year Review Report, Maywood Chemical Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five-Year Review Report, Maywood Chemical Co FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT Maywood Chemical Co. Superfund Site Bergen County, New Jersey Performed by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 SEPTEMBER 2009 With technical assistance from COM Federal Programs Corporation Under Contract with U.s. Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Contents Executive Summary and Five-Year Review Summary Form .......................... E-l Section 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Site Status.............................. ........................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Organization of the Report ......................................................................... 1-4 Section 2 Site Chronology ...................................................................................... 2-1 Section 3 Background ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Physical Characteristics .............................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Site Location and Description ....................................................... 3-1 3.1.1.1 MISS ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1.2 Stepan Company ................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1.3 Residential Vicinity Properties ........................................ .3-2 3.1.1.4 Commercial and Government Vicinity Properties ....... .3-2 3.1.2 Geology/Soils ................................................................................ .3-2 3.1.3 Topography, Drainage, and Surface Water ............................... .3-3 3.2 Land and Resource Use .............................................................................. 3-4 3.2.1 Current Land Use ........................................................................... 3-4 3.2.1.1 Borough of Maywood ....................................................... 3-4 3.2.1.2 Borough of Lodi ................................................................. 3·5 3.2.1.3 Township of Rochelle Park.. ............................................. :J..5 3.2.2 Future Land Use ............................................................................. 3-5 3.2.2.1 Borough of Maywood ....................................................... 3-6 3.2.2.2 Borough of Lodi ................................................................. 3-6 3.2.2.3 Township of Rochelle Park.. ............................................. 3·7 3.2.2.4 Reasonably AntiCipated Future Land Use and Selection of Cleanup Criteria ............................................................ 3·7 3.2.3 Surface Water and Groundwater Uses ........................................ 3·7 3.3 History of Contamination........................................................................... :J..8 3.4 Initial Response ......................................................................................... .3-10 3.5 Basis for Taking Action ............................................................................. 3-11 Section 4 Remedial Actions ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Remedy Selection and Cleanup Criteria ................................................ ..4-1 4.1.1 Remediation Completed During 1984-1985 ................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Remediation Completed During 1995-1999 ................................ 4-1 4.1.3 Remediation Completed for Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision ............................................................................................ 4-2 4.1.4 Background Levels of Radionuclides ......................................... .4-5 4.2 Remedy Implementation ........................................................................... .4·6 4.2.1 Remediation Completed During 1984 and 1985 ....................... .4-6 4.2.2 Remediation Completed During 1995·1999 ................................ 4-7 4.2.3 Remediation Completed for Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision ............................................................................................ 4-9 ii Table of Contents 4.3 System Operation/Operation and Maintenance ........................ .. ....... .4-11 Section 5 Progress Since Last Review .................................................................. 5-1 Section 6 Five-Year Review Process ..................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Administrative Components.................... .................................................. 6-1 6.2 Community In volvement .... ............ ................................................ .. ......... 6-1 6.3 Document Review ....................... ... .. ........................................................... 6-2 6.4 Data Review ................................................................................................. 6-2 6.5 Site Inspection and Interview .................................................................... 6-2 Section 7 Technical Assessment ........................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Approach of the Technical Assessment... ................................................. 7-1 7.1 .1 Radionuclides in 50il.. ................ .... ............................................. ... 7-2 7.1.2 Gamma Exposure ........................................................................... 7-3 7.1.3 Radon and Radon Decay Products in 5tructure ......................... 7-3 7.2 Phase I Properties Remediated During1984-1985 .................................. 7-4 7.3 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1995-1999 .................................. 7-5 7.4 Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision ............................................... .7-6 7.5 Summary of Technical Assessment... ....................................................... .7-8 Section 8 Issues ........................................................................................................ 8-1 8.1 Phase I Properties Remedia ted During 1984-1985 .................................. 8-1 8.2 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1995-1999 .................................. 8-1 8.3 Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision ................................................ 8-2 Section 9 Recommendations and Follow-up Actions ....................................... 9-1 9.1 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1984-1985 .................................. 9-1 9.2 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1995-1999 .................................. 9-1 9.3 Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision ................................................ 9-2 Section 10 Protectiveness Statement .................................................................. 10-1 10.1 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1984-1985 ........... ..................... 10-1 10.2 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1995-1999 ................................ 10-1 10.3 Properties in the 2003 Record of Decision .............................................. l0-1 Section 11 Next Review ........................................................................................ 11-1 COM iii Table of Contents List of Tables 1-1 Property List 4-1 Cleanup Criteria for Phase I Properties -1984 to 1985 4-2 Cleanup Criteria for Phase I Properties - 1995 to 1999 4-3 Cleanup Criteria in 2003 Record of Decision 7-1 Summary of Reviews for Phase I Properties - 1984 to 1985 7-2 Summary of Reviews for Phase I Properties -1995 to 1999 7-3 Summary of Reviews for 2003 ROD Properties 8-1 Summary of Issues for Phase I Properties - 1984 to 1985 8-2 Summary of Issues for Phase I Properties -1995 to 1999 8-3 Summary of Issues for 2003 ROD Properties 9-1 Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions for Phase I Properties - 1984 to 1985 9-2 Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions for Phase I Properties - 1995 to 1999 9-3 Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions for 2003 ROD Properties List of Figures 1-1 Site Map 3-1 Site Location Map 3-2 Land Use Map 3-3 Buildings/Structures, Burial Pits, and Retention Pond Locations 4-1 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1984-1985 4-2 Phase I Properties Remediated During 1995-1999 4-3 Properties in 2003 Record of Decision List of Appendices Appendix A Public Notice of Five-Year Review Appendix B List of Reference Documents Reviewed/ Reference Appendix C Post-Remedial Action Data (Provided on DVD only) Appendix D Radiological Survey Reports, Radiological Characterization Reports, Results of the Independent Radiological Verification Survey Post-Remedial Action Reports, and 2007 Annual Monitoring Report (Provided on DVD only) Appendix E Five-Year Review Site Inspection/ Interview Meeting Minutes Appendix F USACE Correspondences to Owners of ROD OU2 Properties Regarding Construction Notification Requests AppendixG Draft USACE Technical Memorandum for Initial Listed Properties Assessment AppendiX H Memorandum of Understanding between USACE and NJDOT aune 9, 2000) COM "_~Co.s.-turoI_,.-...v .. _ .. _ Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations AEC Atomic Energy Commission ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable ARARs Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements BNL Bechtel National, me. CDM COM Federal Programs Corporation CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations cae Contaminant of Concern DCGL Derived
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BJ's Wholesale Club-30 Route 17, Blk 501, Lot 5
    STONEFIELD August 4, 2020 Borough of Paramus Planning Board 1 West Jockish Square #1 Paramus, New Jersey 07652 RE: Traffic & Parking Assessment Report Proposed Fueling Service Addition to BJ’s Wholesale Club Block 501, Lot 5 and Block 502, Lots 2.02 & 9 30 NJSH Route 17 North Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey SE&D Job No. S-19114 Dear Board Members: Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC (“Stonefield”) has prepared this analysis to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed fuel service addition to the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club on the adjacent roadway network. The subject property is located along NJSH Route 17 North to the south of NJSH Route 4 in the Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey. The subject property is designated as Block 501, Lot 5, and Block 502, Lot 9 and 2.02 as depicted on the Borough of Paramus Tax Map. The site has approximately 905 feet of frontage along the NJSH Route 17 North off-ramp to NJSH Route 4. The existing site is currently developed with a BJ’s Wholesale Club. Access is currently provided via one (1) right-turn ingress- only driveway along NJSH Route 17 North, one (1) right-turn ingress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue, and one (1) right-turn egress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue. Under the proposed development program, a fueling station with 10 fueling positions would be constructed in the southerly portion of the existing parking area. The construction of the fueling station would result in a net reduction to the overall parking supply of 103 parking spaces, and 445 parking spaces would be provided for the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ
    Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ Prepared for the Montvale Planning Board by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning & Real Estate Consultants Adopted April 1, 2008 MASTER PLAN FOR THE BOROUGH OF MONTVALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared for The Montvale Planning Board Prepared by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning and Real Estate Consultants 434 Sixth Avenue New York, New York 10011 125 Half Mile Road—Suite 200 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Adopted April 1, 2008 Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Purpose 1 C. Brief History of Montvale 1 1. Early History 1 2. Incorporation (1894 to 1950) 3 3. 1950 to the Present 4 D. Scope of Master Plan 4 E. Context for Preparation of Master Plan 5 1. Development in Corporate Office Sector 5 2. Downtown Renaissance 6 3. Diversification of Housing Stock 6 4. Acquisition and Improvement of Public Parks and Open Space 6 5. New Community Facilities 7 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY RESIDENT AND BUSINESS SURVEYS 8 A. Introduction 8 B. Community Resident Survey 8 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 8 2. Survey Results 10 C. Community Business Survey 30 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 30 2. Results of the Survey 31 3. Analysis of the Survey Results 42 CHAPTER 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 44 CHAPTER 4. LAND USE 47 A. Introduction 47 B. Existing Uses 47 1. Residential 47 2. Non-Residential 52 C. Existing Zoning 56 1. Residential 58 D. Consistency of Existing Uses With Current Zoning 61 E. Montvale’s Land Use Plan 62 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Energy. Remedial Action Work Plan For
    # - i-aq'f 'l.n't{i(ni; ',.Jp ..f*{ oRo-850 REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN FOR THE MAYI'IOOD SITE JULY I9B4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction and Objectives I l.I Background I L.2 Site ldentification I 1.3 Purpose 3 2.O Site Description 4 2.L Site Location and Description 4 2.2 Radiological Description 4 2.3 Site Geology and Hydrology 7 3.0 Management Approach 9 4.0 Work Plan 11 4.L Remedial Action Criteria I1 4.2 Site Characterization L4 4.3 Prelininary Engineering I5 . 4.4 NEPA 16 4.5 Design Engineering L7 4.6 Access Agreenents I7 4.7 Renedial Actions L7 4.8 Occupational Exposures 2L 4.9 Verification Sampling and Analysis 23 4. l0 Waste Volume Projections 25 4.Il Quality Assurance 25 4.L2 l"taintenance and Surveillance 25 5.0 Schedule and Cost 28 6.0 References 30 Appendix A Radiological Survey/t'tonitoring Plan 111 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE I-L t"laywood Interim Storage Site and Vicinity Properties 2-L Waste Burial Sites on Stepan Company Property 4-L Proposed Storage Pile at the MISS 22 5-1 Maywood Site Schedule and Cost Summary 29 LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE 4-L Sunmary of Residual Contamination Guidelines L2 for the Maywood Site 4-2 Approximate Waste Volume Projections 27 tv I.O INTRODUCTIONAND OBJECTIVES }.1 BACKGROUND The United States Government initiated the Forurerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in L974.
    [Show full text]
  • SNPLI Long Island REGIONAL #2 SITE INFORMATION April 12 – April 14, 2018
    SNPLI Long Island REGIONAL #2 SITE INFORMATION April 12 – April 14, 2018 Event Location Hofstra University Arena 1000 Fulton Avenue Hempstead, NY 11550 Phone: (516) 463-6600 NOTE: The site will not accept or store team robots or toolboxes. http://www.sbpli-lifirst.org/robotics.html http://www.hofstra.edu/home/index.html Directions to Hofstra University Arena For directions and bus and train schedules use the web address below: http://www.hofstra.edu/StudentServ/IC/ic_hofstra_directions.cfm From New York City: From the Queens Midtown Tunnel, continue on the Long Island Expressway (I-495) East to exit 38, Northern State Parkway East, to the Meadowbrook Parkway South (exit 31A) ... Stay on the Meadowbrook Parkway until Exit M4 (sign reads "Hempstead" and "Coliseum") Follow "From All Points," below. From southern New Jersey, southeast Pennsylvania, Maryland, Washington, D.C., and Virginia: Take N.J. Turnpike to Exit 13. Follow Route 278 to Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. Take left exit off bridge onto the Belt Parkway East. Take that to Exit 25A (Southern State Parkway East — the Belt Parkway splits, stay left). Take that to Exit 22N (Meadowbrook Parkway North). Stay on the Meadowbrook Parkway until Exit M4 (sign reads "Hempstead" and "Coliseum"). Follow "From All Points," below. From northwestern New Jersey, northern Pennsylvania, and the Middle States: Take either Interstate 78, Interstate 80, US Route 22, New Jersey Route 4, or New Jersey Route 17 to the George Washington Bridge. Proceed over the bridge to the Cross Bronx Expressway onto the Throgs Neck Bridge:Follow directions from Throgs Neck Bridge, detailed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Maywood Chemical Company Superfund Site ADMINISTRATIVE
    Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Maywood Chemical Company Superfund Site ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Operable Unit 1 – Soils and Buildings __________________________ Document Number MISS-151 __________________________ COMMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN FUSRAP MAYWOOD SUPERFUND SITE MAYWOOD, NEW JERSEY SITE-SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT NO. W912DQ-13-D-3016 TASK ORDER 001 Prepared for Department of the Army Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District Kansas City District 26 Federal Plaza 700 Federal Building New York, New York 10278 Kansas City, Missouri 64103 Prepared by 100 West Hunter Avenue Maywood, New Jersey 07607 November 2013 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgment .............................................................................................................. iii Section 1 Overview of Community Relations Plan (CRP) ............................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 CRP Background ..................................................................................... 1-2 Section 2 Capsule Site Description ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Site Location and
    [Show full text]
  • H. R. 3550 [Report No
    IB Union Calendar No. 259 108TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 3550 [Report No. 108–452, Part I] To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOVEMBER 20, 2003 Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PETRI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. COBLE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. GILCHREST, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MICA, Mr. NADLER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. QUINN, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mrs. KELLY, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. BAKER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. NEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BOS- WELL, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HAYES, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. SIMMONS, Ms. BERKLEY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. WEINER, Mr. PLATTS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. KEN- NEDY of Minnesota, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. POR- TER, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma) introduced the fol- lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure MARCH 29, 2004 Reported with an amendment and referred to the Committees on Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Resources, and Science, for a period ending not later than March 29, 2004, for consider- ation of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the ju- risdictions of those committees pursuant to clause 1 of rule X 2 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] MARCH 29, 2004 Additional sponsors: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Avenue (CR 503) – Carlstadt Borough Road Safety Audit
    Washington Avenue (CR 503) – Carlstadt Borough Road Safety Audit FINAL REPORT October 2013 Submitted by Andy Kaplan SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY ENGINEER Sally Karasov Michael Weber TRANSPORTATION SAFETY ENGINEER ENGINEERING RESEARCHER Center for Advanced Infrastructure & Transportation (CAIT) RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NJDOT Research Project Manager Robert Desando In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Data Development and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DISCLAIMER STATEMENT Road Safety Audit reports provided by Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation staff do not constitute an engineering report. The agency responsible for design and construction should consult a professional engineer licensed in the State of New Jersey in preparing construction documents to implement any of the safety countermeasures in the report. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Rutgers Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Such document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. ii Report No. Government Accession No. Recipient’s Catalog No. Title and Subtitle Report Date Washington Avenue (CR 503) Road Safety Audit October 2013 Performing Organization Code CAIT/Rutgers Author(s) Performing Organization Report No. Andy Kaplan, Sally Karasov, Michael Weber Performing Organization Name and Address Work Unit No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 Student Handbook
    2011-2012 Student Handbook Table of Contents ACADEMIC CALENDAR OF THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE .................................................................................. 1 WELCOMES ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Welcome from Hofstra University President, Stuart Rabinowitz ............................................... 2 Welcome from North Shore-LIJ Health System President, Michael Dowling ............................. 2 Welcome from Hofstra University School of Medicine in partnership with North Shore-LIJ Health System Dean, Lawrence G. Smith ................................................................................... 3 Welcome from Assistant Dean for Student Affairs, Jodi Langsfeld ............................................ 3 LEADERSHIP ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Hofstra University President and Senior Leadership .................................................................. 4 Trustees of Hofstra University .................................................................................................... 4 North Shore-LIJ Health System President and Senior Leadership .............................................. 6 Trustees of the North Shore – LIJ Health System ....................................................................... 6 School of Medicine Dean and Senior Leadership ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rockland County, New York Adopted Comprehensive Plan
    VILLAGE OF AIRMONT ROCKLAND COUNTY, NEW YORK ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Prepared by: VILLAGE OF AIRMONT MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE With assistance from: TURNER MILLER GROUP PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS Recommended to the Village of Airmont Board of Trustees: December 10, 2007 Adopted with revisions: September 19, 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VILLAGE OF AIRMONT MASTER PLAN COMMITTEE FRANK GETCHELL, CHAIRMAN ANTHONY VALENTI DENNIS COHEN CHARLES PICARELLI JACKIE SOLOMON DOUG WHIPPLE PLANNING CONSULTANT TURNER MILLER GROUP 2 EXECUTIVE BLVD. SUITE 108 SUFFERN, NEW YORK 10901 ENGINEERING CONSULTANT BROOKER ENGINEERING 76 LAFAYETTE AVENUE SUFFERN, NEW YORK 10901 Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND STUDIES 1 A. Location and Regional Setting 2 B. Demographics 2 C. Existing Land Use 5 D. Environmental Conditions 7 E. Historic Preservation 12 F. Utilities 13 G. Circulation 15 III. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 18 A. Build Out Analysis 18 B. Residential Zoning Districts 18 C. Non Residential Zoning Districts 19 IV. GOALS 21 V. VISION 22 VI. PLAN 23 A. Concept Plan for the Route 59 Corridor 23 B. Concept Plan for the Residential Portion of the Village 23 VII. IMPLEMENTATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 A. Route 59 Corridor Design Guidelines 25 B. Proposed Zoning District Modifications 27 C. Proposed Recommendations for Recreation and Open Space 28 D. Proposed Recommendations to Protect and Improve Water Resources 28 E. Proposed Historic Preservation Recommendations 30 F. Proposed Utility Recommendations 30 G. Proposed Circulation Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • FMSS Feasibility Study
    FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SOILS AND BUILDINGS AT THE FUSRAP MAYWOOD SUPERFUND SITE MAYWOOD, NEW JERSEY August 2002 __________________________ Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SOILS AND BUILDINGS AT THE FUSRAP MAYWOOD SUPERFUND SITE MAYWOOD, NEW JERSEY August 2002 __________________________ prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District Office, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program with technical assistance from Stone & Webster, Inc. Under Contract No. DACW41-99-D-9001 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND SYMBOLS............................................................................................vi ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION AND NEED FOR ACTION ..........................................................................................1-1 1.1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ..........................................................1-11 1.2 SCOPING ..................................................................................................................................................1-16
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Proposed Plan, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action
    -fnV- - ga 'WO!20Fh Groundwater Proposed Plan Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Maywood Superfund Site Preparedby. US Army Corps of Engineers. With Assistance from: Shaw Environmental, Inc. 100 West Hunter Avenue Maywood, New Jersey 07607 Contract No. DACW41-99-D-9001 September 2010 GROUNDWATER PROPOSED PLAN FUSRAP MAYWOOD SUPERFUND SITE MAYWOOD, NEW JERSEY SITE-SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT NO. DACW41-99-D-9001 TASK ORDER 0004 WAD 03 Preparedby: Department of the Army Department of the Army U.S. Army Engineer District, New York U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers FUSRAP Project Office 700 Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza Kansas City, Missouri 64106 New York, New York 10278 With assistancefrom: Shaw Environmental, Inc. 100 West Hunter Avenue Maywood, New Jersey 07607 September 2010 Issued to: Date: Copy No. _---] Controlled F-] Uncontrolled GROUNDWATER PROPOSED PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS T A B L E O F C O N T EN T S .............................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ................ ............................ ........................................ i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................... ii 1.0 IN T R O D U C T IO N ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PU RPOSE OF PROPOSED PLAN ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University Field Visiting Team Guide
    HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS 2013-2014 VISITING TEAM GUIDE BASEBALL Hempstead, New York Phone: 516-463-4632 Hotels and Dining Information Hotels L.I. Marriott 101 James Doolittle Blvd. Uniondale (1 mile) 516.794.3800 Garden City Hotel 45 Seventh St., Garden City (3 miles) 516.747.3000 Hyatt Place 5 North Ave., Garden City (3 miles) 516.222.6277 Hilton Garden Inn Old Country Rd. Westbury (3 miles) 516.683.8200 Holiday Inn Old Country Rd. Westbury (3 miles) 516.997.5000 Red Roof Inn 699 Dibblee Dr. Westbury (3 miles) 516.794.4369 La Quinta 821 Stewart Avenue, Garden City (3 miles) 516.705.9000 Melville Marrioitt Rte. 110, Melville, NY (20 miles) 631.423.1600 Huntington Hilton Rte. 110, Melville, NY (20 miles) 631.845.1000 Dining Opportunities Fast Food McDonald’s 1110 Hempstead Turnpike, Hempstead 516.292.5944 Burger King 500 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow 516.565.9462 Wendy’s 1730 Hempstead Turnpike, East Meadow 516.794.4416 Dunkin Donuts 976 Hempstead Turnpike, Uniondale 516.485.2953 Moe’s Southwest Grill 674 Stewart Ave, Garden City 516.794.8200 Sandwiches Coliseum Deli 1150 Hempstead Turnpike, Uniondale 516.483.4900 Jim’s Deli 914 Front Street, Uniondale 516.483.2456 Restaurants/Diners Vincent’s Clam Bar 179 Old Country Road, Carle Place 516.742.4577 T.G.I. Friday' s 829 Merrick Ave., Westbury 516.832.8320 Tin Alley Grill 630 Stewart Ave., Garden City 516.228.3370 Bertucci’s 795 Merrick Ave, Westbury 516.683.8800 Olive Garden 1246 Old Country Rd, Westbury 516.683.3377 Borelli’s 1590 Hempstead Tpke, East Meadow 516.794.0190 PIZZA Napolini Express 325 Oak St, Uniondale, NY 11553 516.505.5500 Airports and distance to campus: John F.
    [Show full text]