DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Realism and Political Philosophy in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract in Political Science in the Graduate Di

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Realism and Political Philosophy in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract in Political Science in the Graduate Di Political Realism and Political Philosophy in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract by Haozhe Wang A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Wendy Brown, Chair Professor David Bates Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2013 Abstract Political Realism and Political Philosophy in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract by Haozhe Wang Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Wendy Brown, Chair This thesis places Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the “realist” or raison d’état tradition of political thought. While highly critical of the conceptualization of political sovereignty among earlier social contract theorists such as Hugo Grotius and Thomas Hobbes and also very condemnatory of the popular eighteen-century discourse of reason of state, Rousseau preserves some of the most important insights in the theory of state and political sovereignty of earlier authors, in particular the value, status, and justification of political life. This thesis thus looks at both the continuity and the disruption or corrections that Rousseau represents in the tradition of political realism. The first part of the dissertation looks at Rousseau’s reflections on international politics, political economy, and the role of government. It examines Rousseau’s criticism of the seemingly triumphant theory and practice of realpolitik and mercantilism in the eighteenth-century and how this criticism derives from his overriding concern with political equality and liberty in the Social Contract . The second part of the dissertation details the necessary link between Rousseau’s conceptualization of the political and his epistemology and linguistic anthropology. Rousseau’s linguistics accounts for both his emphasis on equality as the condition of the political and his anxiety over the fragility of the political. Rousseau must confront a gap between the concept of the political as a just and equitable form of civil association and the utter impossibility of the literality of the political condition. Rousseau’s theory of government and his resentment of mercantile administration must be read in light of this gap between the concept and literality of the political. 1 Introduction Rousseau’s political realism This thesis will read Jean-Jacques Rousseau as a political realist. There are several aspects to this political realism that intersect each other in Rousseau’s writings. Political scientists most commonly understand realism as a principle that governs the treacherous and mutually suspicious relationships between states. Thanks to some fine works by Kenneth Waltz, Stanley Hoffman, and others, 1 we now accept that Rousseau indeed has something meaningful to say on international politics. Realism is also frequently associated with Thomas Hobbes and a certain notion of sovereignty that is absolutist and overridingly concerned with (collective and individual) self-interest and self-preservation that justifies and legitimates the political state.2 Rousseau’s own Hobbism is well noted not only for the use of the fiction of state of nature but for the domestic analogy of man and state, which according to some authors may have been an inspiration for the political ideas found in the Social Contract .3 Above all, I argue that Rousseau’s realism lies in a certain understanding of the political that, as with Machiavelli and Carl Schmitt, asserts its reality and autonomy as well as skepticism of metaphysical, moral, cultural, religious norms that claim their conceptual anteriority. 4 Rousseau’s political realism encompasses all these elements: a privileged ontic status of the political, an absolutist notion of sovereign authority, and a quintessentially pluralistic international politics. They are welded together in original ways in Rousseau. In calling Rousseau a realist I want to show that he culminated a development in early modern political thought that started to uphold the meaning and essence of political life as legitimate exercise of collective self-preservation and defense of security and unity of the body politic and emphasize the primacy and autonomy of this political logic. 5 But I want to address also what I hold to be important corrections to the realist tradition that Rousseau’s political theory, especially his theory of government, entails. The two tasks are inseparable because accounting for Rousseau’s theory of political sovereignty necessitates a critical engagement with aspects in the natural law theories of Hugo Grotius and Hobbes as well as the economic, fiscal, and foreign policies of the leading European states of their time that modern scholarship often calls “realist” but which Rousseau deems incompatible with the principle of popular sovereignty and the essence of political life. To put Rousseau in that tradition, to expound the continuity as well as the disruption or (self-)correction of the tradition in Rousseau’s political thought, yields a concept of political sovereignty that I think will be more satisfactory than previously understood in the realist or raison d’état tradition. In his critique of the conquest rights that Grotius, Hobbes, and Samuel von Pufendorf all cited in explaining the origin of the political, we first see the simultaneous disruption and continuity that Rousseau presents in the realist tradition. Rousseau appreciates the bold theoretical innovation of conquest rights in hypothesizing an origin of the political that does not depend on any assumption of natural or commercial sociability of humankind or any ethical and judicial principles. Rousseau’s critique of conquest rights is not a dissent from this realist concept of the political that has proclaimed its radical conceptual autonomy in the Grotian or Hobbesian contract; rather, Rousseau’s complaint is that the fact of conquest cannot establish an absolute and perpetual sovereign authority 1 and that the true political condition – in which individuals join the contract to form a constituted whole in order to live in the peace and security of the whole – never takes hold in a state founded on conquest. In Rousseau, collective security is only possible if we join as free and equal members. The political condition is thus innately emancipatory because all subjects surrender themselves equally to the rule of law and thus save themselves from any other forms of dependency. For Rousseau, dominion acquired through temporary advantage in force injects an element of instability to political life that contradicts the very idea of sovereignty, which is supposed to perpetuate and preserve itself against threats of foreign and civil wars. It is precisely this realist or absolutist conception of political sovereignty that must guarantee moral autonomy, equality, and justice to the citizens. Without this emancipatory dimension, political sovereignty is never complete or self-sustaining. Moreover, Rousseau inherits but also expands Grotius and Hobbes’s understanding of the relationship between sovereignty and government. For the two natural law theorists, the inquiry into the nature of the political is separate and superior to matters of statecraft and administration that in previous centuries had obstructed any scientific, abstract, and universal understanding of the nature of political power and sovereign authority. Rousseau, too, insists that the government is merely the minister of the sovereign and that the relativity and particularity of the science of government must not obscure the universal validity and truth of the principles of the social contract. Writing in the age of mature absolutism, however, Rousseau also vehemently castigates the statecraft of the ancien régime . Rousseau observes that the eighteenth century practice of realpolitik was part of a mercantile governmental reason that was purported to create not only a European balance of power but also a pattern of economic production, circulation, and extraction that was unjust and unequal. The skewed understanding of national interests and security not only gave rise to a set of economic and fiscal policies that were tyrannical and caused inequalities between the city and the country and between social classes but also threatened the sovereignty and unity of the state. The mercantile reason of state thus conflates the appearance of an absolutist, undivided government with the majesty of unified sovereignty; it is usurpation and despotism. Rousseau wants to at once uphold the emancipatory and egalitarian promise of the political and to purge absolute sovereignty of its unsavory association with despotism and the mercantile competition between states by proposing a science of government that can maintain the security, rigor, and health of the state and above all must prevent its own degeneration into corruption, centralization, and tyranny. Far from being a utopian ideal, Rousseau’s concept of legitimate sovereignty and his attack on tyranny entails a theory of political administration and public economy that must embody and materialize what is otherwise an abstract doctrine of popular sovereignty and must substitute for the mercantilist governmental reason. Whereas the principle of liberty and equality is everywhere the same and the general will has the quality of predictable simplicity, Rousseau knows that states must assume different forms of government contingent upon the climate of the land,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Logic of Violence in Civil War Has Much Less to Do with Collective Emotions, Ideologies, Cultures, Or “Greed and Grievance” Than Currently Believed
    P1: KAE 0521854091pre CUNY324B/Kalyvas 0 521 85409 1 March 27, 2006 20:2 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: KAE 0521854091pre CUNY324B/Kalyvas 0 521 85409 1 March 27, 2006 20:2 TheLogic of Violence in Civil War By analytically decoupling war and violence, this book explores the causes and dynamics of violence in civil war. Against prevailing views that such violence is either the product of impenetrable madness or a simple way to achieve strategic objectives, the book demonstrates that the logic of violence in civil war has much less to do with collective emotions, ideologies, cultures, or “greed and grievance” than currently believed. Stathis Kalyvas distinguishes between indis- criminate and selective violence and specifies a novel theory of selective violence: it is jointly produced by political actors seeking information and indi- vidual noncombatants trying to avoid the worst but also grabbing what oppor- tunities their predicament affords them. Violence is not a simple reflection of the optimal strategy of its users; its profoundly interactive character defeats sim- ple maximization logics while producing surprising outcomes, such as relative nonviolence in the “frontlines” of civil war. Civil war offers irresistible opportu- nities to those who are not naturally bloodthirsty and abhor direct involvement in violence. The manipulation of political organizations by local actors wishing to harm their rivals signals a process of privatization of political violence rather than the more commonly thought politicization of private life. Seen from this perspective, violence is a process taking place because of human aversion rather than a predisposition toward homicidal violence, which helps explain the para- dox of the explosion of violence in social contexts characterized by high levels of interpersonal contact, exchange, and even trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltz's Theory of Theory
    WALTZ’S THEORY OF THEORY 201 Waltz’s Theory of Theory Ole Wæver Abstract Waltz’s 1979 book, Theory of International Politics, is the most infl uential in the history of the discipline. It worked its effects to a large extent through raising the bar for what counted as theoretical work, in effect reshaping not only realism but rivals like liberalism and refl ectivism. Yet, ironically, there has been little attention paid to Waltz’s very explicit and original arguments about the nature of theory. This article explores and explicates Waltz’s theory of theory. Central attention is paid to his defi nition of theory as ‘a picture, mentally formed’ and to the radical anti-empiricism and anti-positivism of his position. Followers and critics alike have treated Waltzian neorealism as if it was at bottom a formal proposition about cause–effect relations. The extreme case of Waltz being so victorious in the discipline, and yet being so consistently misinterpreted on the question of theory, shows the power of a dominant philosophy of science in US IR, and thus the challenge facing any ambitious theorising. The article suggests a possible movement of fronts away from the ‘fourth debate’ between rationalism and refl ectivism towards one of theory against empiricism. To help this new agenda, the article introduces a key literature from the philosophy of science about the structure of theory, and particularly about the way even natural science uses theory very differently from the way IR’s mainstream thinks it does – and much more like the way Waltz wants his theory to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Change in International Politics: the New Institutionalism and the Interpretative Approach
    Analyzing Change in International Politics: The New Institutionalism and the Interpretative Approach - Guest Lecture - Peter J. Katzenstein* 90/10 This discussion paper was presented as a guest lecture at the MPI für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln, on April 5, 1990 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Lothringer Str. 78 D-5000 Köln 1 Federal Republic of Germany MPIFG Discussion Paper 90/10 Telephone 0221/ 336050 ISSN 0933-5668 Fax 0221/ 3360555 November 1990 * Prof. Peter J. Katzenstein, Cornell University, Department of Government, McGraw Hall, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853, USA 2 MPIFG Discussion Paper 90/10 Abstract This paper argues that realism misinterprets change in the international system. Realism conceives of states as actors and international regimes as variables that affect national strategies. Alternatively, we can think of states as structures and regimes as part of the overall context in which interests are defined. States conceived as structures offer rich insights into the causes and consequences of international politics. And regimes conceived as a context in which interests are defined offer a broad perspective of the interaction between norms and interests in international politics. The paper concludes by suggesting that it may be time to forego an exclusive reliance on the Euro-centric, Western state system for the derivation of analytical categories. Instead we may benefit also from studying the historical experi- ence of Asian empires while developing analytical categories which may be useful for the analysis of current international developments. ***** In diesem Aufsatz wird argumentiert, daß der "realistische" Ansatz außenpo- litischer Theorie Wandel im internationalen System fehlinterpretiere. Dieser versteht Staaten als Akteure und internationale Regime als Variablen, die nationale Strategien beeinflussen.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule by the Few in the Federalist Papers: an Examination of the Aristocratic Preference of Publius
    Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies 10(2) (2021), DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2020-0020 Rule by the Few in the Federalist Papers: An Examination of the Aristocratic Preference of Publius Carl M. Felice IV.* ABSTRACT The Federalist Papers are a set of eighty-five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay during the founding era of the United States, with the purpose of persuading the states to adopt the Constitution as the replacement for the Articles of Confederation. The Papers were some of the most impressive political writings of the time, and are still cited frequently today by the United States Supreme Court. The arguments set forth in the Papers attempted to defend the Constitution’s aristocratic characteristics against its opponents, the Anti-Federalists, while also attempting to normalize an anti-democratic, representative form of government in the minds of the American people. The clever advocacy and skillful rhetoric employed by Hamilton, Madison, and Jay led to the eventual ratification of the Constitution, and consequently the creation of the most powerful and prosperous nation on the planet. This paper examines the differences between the traditional forms of government, the political philosophies of the Papers’ authors, the anti-democratic, aristocratic nature of the government proposed by the Constitution, and the arguments for and against its adoption, as articulated in the Papers and various other writings. KEYWORDS Federalist Papers, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Aristocracy, Constitution CONTENTS I. Introduction .....................................................................................219 II. Classic Conceptions of Government ............................................219 A. Government as Conceived by Aristotle ........................................219 B. Government as Conceived by Montesquieu .................................222 III.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Literature in English, North America English Language and Literature 6-11-2009 A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau Jack Turner University of Washington Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Turner, Jack, "A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau" (2009). Literature in English, North America. 70. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_english_language_and_literature_north_america/70 A Political Companion to Henr y David Thoreau POLITIcaL COMpaNIONS TO GREat AMERIcaN AUthORS Series Editor: Patrick J. Deneen, Georgetown University The Political Companions to Great American Authors series illuminates the complex political thought of the nation’s most celebrated writers from the founding era to the present. The goals of the series are to demonstrate how American political thought is understood and represented by great Ameri- can writers and to describe how our polity’s understanding of fundamental principles such as democracy, equality, freedom, toleration, and fraternity has been influenced by these canonical authors. The series features a broad spectrum of political theorists, philoso- phers, and literary critics and scholars whose work examines classic authors and seeks to explain their continuing influence on American political, social, intellectual, and cultural life. This series reappraises esteemed American authors and evaluates their writings as lasting works of art that continue to inform and guide the American democratic experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline; Follow Them Very Carefully
    The University of Calgary Historical Studies (HTST) 201 (01) The History of Europe: EUROPE SINCE 1500 Winter 2017 Class times and location: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 9:00 - 9:50 a.m., ICT 121 Instructor: Brad Rennie Office: SS 615 E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: 10:00 - 10:40 a.m. or by appointment Course Description: This course examines major events and developments in European history since 1500, including the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, industrialization, social and political trends, colonialism and imperialism, key wars, totalitarianism, and globalization. It also considers the origins and impact of such events and developments and how they, along with related belief systems, shaped modern western civilization. Lectures will take most of the class time, though there will be some discussions and small-group exercises. Required Readings: Marvin Perry, Sources of the Western Tradition, Volume II: From the Renaissance to the Present, Ninth Edition (2014). Available in the Bookstore. The History Student's Handbook. Free at hist.ucalgary.ca – click on "Essay Guide" on the left. Optional Reading: Marvin Perry, Western Civilization: A Brief History, Volume II: Since 1600, Eleventh Edition (2016). THIS BOOK IS ON ONE-HOUR RESERVE IN THE LIBRARY. Grading: Document analysis 15% Due February 6 Midterm 25% Two parts: Part one on February 15; part two on February 17 Research Paper 30% Due March 27 Final exam 30% Scheduled by the Registrar Exams: The exams will NOT be open book, but to help you prepare for the exams, I'll post in D2L an information sheet before each exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Corruption and Intellectual Activism in Henrik Ibsen's an Enemy of the People
    Political Corruption and Intellectual Activism in Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People Paméssou WALLA∗ University of Lomé, Togo Résumé – Le présent article traite des problèmes liés à la corruption politique et de l’engagement de l’élite intellectuele en matière de la politique. La politique étant définie comme la gestion des affaires de la cité n’est pas toujours sans reproche pour ceux qui l’exercent. La politique loin d’être une lutte pour la cause commune se veut une guerre d’intérêts souvent égoïstes. L’homme politique pour la plupart du temps veut satisfaire ses propres egos au lieu du bien être commun. Pour cela, il met tous les moyens en place pour aboutir ; parmi les stratégies dont il fait usage l’on peut noter la manipulation de la presse, de la conscience des masses et l’exercice de l’opportunisme, c’est-à-dire profiter des failles, exploiter des occasions inattendues à ses propres fins. Par conséquent, cet article vise à montrer comment un intellectuel engagé dans la politique, peut inverser la tendance en jouant un rôle déterminant dans la gestion saine des affaires de la cité victime de manipulation politique. Key Words: politics, corruption, opportunism, manipulation and intellectual activism. 1. Introduction Politics as the science of government is critically fundamental to all human societies. However, it important to know that there are both good and bad politics. Bad politics is concerned with politics based on individual welfare whereas good politics aims at boosting the public life standards. Good politics leads to good governance and the advantages entitled to it are not to be overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-2012)
    É T U D E 5 5 U R L E 1 8' 5 1 È ( L E X V 1 1 1 Revue fondée par Ro land Mortier et Hervé Hasquin DIRECTEURS Valérie André et Brigitte D'Hainaut-Zveny COMITt tDITORIAL Bruno Bernard, Claude Bruneel (Université catholique de Louvain), Carlo Capra (Università degli studi, Milan), David Charlton (Roya l Holloway College, Londres), Manuel Couvreur, Nicolas Cronk (Vo ltaire Foundation, University of Oxford), Michèle Galand, Jan Herman (Katholi eke Universiteit Leuven), Michel Jangoux, Huguette Krief (Un iversité de Provence, Aix-en-Provence), Christophe Loir, Roland Mortier, Fabrice Preyat, Dan iel Rabreau (U niverSité de Paris l, Panthéon-Sorbonne), Daniel Roche (Collège de France), Raymond Trousson et Renate Zedinger (Universitat Wien) GROUPE D'ÉTUDE D U 1 8' 5 1 È ( L E tCRIREÀ Valérie André [email protected] Brigitte D'Hainaut-Zveny Brigitte.D Hainaut @ulb.ac.be ou à l'adresse suivante Groupe d'étude du XVIII' siècle Université libre de Bruxelles (CP 175/01) Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50 • B -1050 Bruxelles JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU (1712-2012) MATÉRIAUX POUR UN RENOUVEAU CRITIQUE Publié avec l'aide financière du Fonds de la recherche scientifique - FNRS Ë T U DES 5 URL E 1 8' 5 1 È ( L E x v 1 1 1 JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU (1712-2012) MATÉRIAUX POUR UN RENOUVEAU CRITIQUE VOLUME COMPOSÉ ET ÉDITÉ PAR CHRISTOPHE VAN STAEN 2 0 1 2 ÉDITIONS DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE BRUXELLES DAN 5 L A M Ê M E COLLECTION Les préoccupations économiques et sociales des philosophes, littérateurs et artistes au XVIII e siècle, 1976 Bruxelles au XVIIIe siècle, 1977 L'Europe et les révolutions (1770-1800), 1980 La noblesse belge au XVIIIe siècle, 1982 Idéologies de la noblesse, 1984 Une famille noble de hauts fonctionnaires: les Neny, 1985 Le livre à Liège et à Bruxelles au XVIIIe siècle, 1987 Unité et diversité de l'empire des Habsbourg à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, 1988 Deux aspects contestés de la politique révolutionnaire en Belgique: langue et culte, 1989 Fêtes et musiques révolutionnaires: Grétry et Gossec, 1990 Rocaille.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Contract As Bourgeois Ideology Stephen C
    Social Contract as Bourgeois Ideology Stephen C. Ferguson II John Rawls (Photo © Steve Pyke.) Since the publication of John Rawls’ magnum opus A Theory of Justice in 1971, there has been a significant resurgence of philosophical work in the tradition of contractarianism. The distinguished bourgeois political philosopher Robert Nozick has argued that A Theory of Justice is one of the most important works in political philosophy since the writings of John Stuart Mill. “Political philosophers,” Nozick concludes, “now must either work within Rawls’ theory or explain why.”1 It is not far from the truth that Rawls single-handedly not only gave life to analytical political philosophy, but also resuscitated contractarianism, a philosophical tradition that — in many respects — had been lying dormant in a philosophical coma. In fact, social contract theory has become the hegemonic tradition in liberal social and political philosophy. As the Afro-Caribbean My thanks for advice, guidance and/or invaluable criticism of earlier drafts to John H. McClendon III, Ann Cudd, Rex Martin, Tom Tuozzo, Robert J. Antonio and Tariq Al-Jamil. I would also like to extend a hearty thanks to Greg Meyerson and David Siar for their invaluable editorial comments. And, lastly, thanks to my wife, Cassondra, and my two sons, Kendall and Trey, for your unqualified love and support in times of tranquility as well as times of crisis. 1 Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974): 183. Copyright © 2007 by Stephen C. Ferguson and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Ferguson 2 philosopher Charles Mills has put it, contract talk is, after all, the political lingua franca of our times.2 In this essay, we will examine the ideological character and theoretical content of contractrarianism as a philosophical tradition beginning with its classic exposition in the works of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and, finally, culminating in the work of John Rawls.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Political Science
    Introduction to Political Science Professor Scott Williamson Fall 2021, Bocconi University e-mail: [email protected] Office hours: TBD Office: TBD Office room: TBD Class hours: TBD Class room: TBD Course Description What explains the rise of populism? How do authoritarian regimes hold onto power? Who opposes migration and why? When is the public more likely to hold political leaders accountable for poor governance? This course introduces the academic discipline of political science by exploring what its literatures have to say about these topics and others with substantive importance to global politics. We will read and discuss recent academic work utilizing a variety of methodological tools to answer these questions. In addition, the course is designed to help students navigate practical issues related to the effective conduct of political and social science research. We will review research practicalities ranging from choosing a research question to finding data and submitting articles to journals. Throughout the course, students will prepare a research proposal on a topic of their choice, which they will present to the class and submit in written format at the conclusion of the term. Course Objectives Throughout the course, students should expect: ▪ To develop knowledge about several major literatures in political science, gaining familiarity with ongoing debates and established findings. ▪ To acquire familiarity with a variety of primarily quantitative research methods used in political science and other social science disciplines. ▪ To develop understanding of how to consume and evaluate academic research, including how to recognize positive contributions, identify weaknesses, and provide constructive feedback in oral and written forms.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Newsletters
    APA Newsletters Volume 06, Number 2 Spring 2007 NEWSLETTER ON PHILOSOPHY AND LAW FROM THE EDITOR, STEVEN SCALET ARTICLES BRIAN H. BIX “Joseph Raz and Conceptual Analysis” JULES L. COLEMAN “Law and Political Morality” TIMOTHY ENDICOTT “Interpretation, Jurisdiction, and the Authority of Law” KENNETH EINAR HIMMA “Revisiting Raz: Inclusive Positivism and the Concept of Authority” LIAM MURPHY “Razian Concepts” STEPHEN PERRY “Two Problems of Political Authority” © 2007 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 APA NEWSLETTER ON Philosophy and Law Steven Scalet, Editor Spring 2007 Volume 06, Number 2 relating to such theories. In particular, I will look at the role of conceptual analysis in legal theory, focusing on some recent FROM THE EDITOR work by Joseph Raz.1 I. Overview Edition in Tribute to Joseph Raz It was a commonplace in the history of jurisprudence to focus on the inquiry, what is law? It is worth taking a few moments Joseph Raz is professor at Columbia University Law School to consider the question more closely. and research faculty at Oxford University. His writings influence generations of scholars and his many students are now among First and foremost, there is a potential confusion (heightened 2 the leading scholars in philosophy of law. in English more than in other major languages ), as “law,” even if focused on matters jurisprudential (and not speaking of physical For this edition of the Newsletter we invited leading political laws, the laws of games, social conventions, etc.), can refer to and legal philosophers to analyze some aspect of Professor a number of different, if related, matters: most prominently, Raz’s ideas.
    [Show full text]