Annual Safety Recommendations Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Safety Recommendations Review ANNUAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW 2015 SAFETYANNUAL RECOMMENDATIONS Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2015 EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY AVIATION EUROPEAN EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY SAFETY ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT Designed in Luxembourg Strategy & Safety Management Directorate Safety Intelligence & Performance Department Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2015 Disclaimer: Neither the European Aviation Safety Agency, nor any person acting on behalf of the European Aviation Safety Agency is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The Annual Safety Recommendation Review is produced by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). This edition provides an overview of the safety recommendations that have been addressed to EASA in 2015. It also presents the replies produced during the year. This annual review aims at providing a feedback on the follow-up given to safety recommendations in the con- text of openness, transparency and accountability that characterises the European Public Administration. Apart from its safety related information character, this review is also expected to provide relevant information related to raised safety concerns, both for EASA itself, as well as its stakeholders, including the European public. © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2016. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Printed copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet site: www.easa.europa.eu. 2015 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Contents Abbreviation list 4 1. Introduction 6 2. Safety Recommendations received in 2015 9 Overview of Safety Recommendations received in 2015 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Origin of the Safety Recommendations received in 2015 �������������������������������������������������������������������������12 3. Safety Recommendations replied in 2015 14 Overview of Safety Recommendations replies in 2015 �����������������������������������������������������������������������������15 Status of the Safety Recommendations replies in 2015 �����������������������������������������������������������������������������16 4. Overview of key safety issues processed and actions carried out in 2015 18 Aircraft tracking, rescue operation and safety investigations ������������������������������������������������������������������19 Cabin Air Quality ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������20 Risks posed by Lithium Batteries on Board / Transportation of Lithium Batteries ����������������������������������21 Unexpected Autopilot Behaviour on Instrument Landing System (ILS) Approach �����������������������������������22 Unreliable Airspeed Indication at High Altitude/ Manual Handling at High Altitude �����������������������������23 Loss of Control Prevention and Recovery Training �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������23 Runway Safety/ Mitigating the risk of Runway Excursion (RE)������������������������������������������������������������������24 Inadequate Go Around ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Helicopter Offshore Operations ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25 Rotorcraft fuel tank crashworthiness ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������26 Parachuting operations �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������26 Ballistic Parachute Recovery Systems (BPRS) ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������27 Medical and psychological conditions of flight crew ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������28 5. Conclusions 29 ANNEX A: List of 2015 Safety Recommendations Replies 31 ANNEX B: Definitions 154 ANNEX C: Safety Recommendations classification 157 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 Abbreviation list ANNEX A. ANNEX B. ANNEX C. 2015 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Abbreviation list PAGE 5 Abbreviation list AD Airworthiness Directive AFM Aircraft Flight Manual AMC Acceptable Means of Compliance ANSV Italian National Agency for the Safety of Flight BEA Bureau d’Enquête et d’Analyse pour l’Aviation Civile BPRS Ballistic Parachute Recovery Systems CAT Commercial Air Transport CM Certification Memo CRI Certification Review Item CRM Crew Resource Management CS Certification Specifications CS-LSA Certification Specifications for Light Sport Aeroplanes CVR Cockpit voice recorder DSB Dutch Safety Board ELT Emergency Locator Transmitter ENCASIA European Network of Civil Aviation Safety Investigation Authorities EPAS European Plan for Aviation Safety ETOPS Extended Operation ETSO European Technical Standard Order EU European Union FAA Federal Aviation Administration GM Guidance Material GP Glide Path HOFO Helicopter Offshore Operations ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICCAIA International Coordination Council for Aerospace Industry Associations ILS Instrument Landing System LOC-I Loss of control-inflight MOPSC Maximum Operational Passenger Seating Configuration MS Member states NCO Non-Commercial operations with Other than complex motor-powered aircraft RE Runway Excursion CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 Introduction ANNEX A. ANNEX B. ANNEX C. 2015 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Introduction PAGE 7 Introduction At the European Union level, the principles governing the investigation of accidents and serious incidents are de- fined in Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation. Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 implements international standards and recommended practices as described in Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. It sets down an obligation for each Member State of the European Union (EU) to establish an independent permanent national civil aviation safety investi- gation authority, which shall investigate accidents and serious incidents in order to improve aviation safety and prevent future occurrences without apportioning blame or liability. Investigation reports and the related safety recommendations shall be communicated to the concerned aviation authorities for consideration and appropri- ate action, as needed. Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, which established EASA, states that “Results of air accident investigations should be acted upon as a matter of urgency, in particular when they relate to defective aircraft design and/or opera- tional matters, in order to ensure consumer confidence in air transport”. EASA assigns a high priority to the follow-up of safety recommendations and has established effective proce- dures to that effect: EASA delivers the first response to incoming recommendations within 90 days; The safety recommendations process is subject to continuous internal monitoring until all corrective actions are closed; The Agency receives assessments of its responses from Safety Investigation Authorities and can identify when opinions diverge. In this context, EASA considers the assessment given by the safe- ty investigation authority on the appropriateness of the mitigation measures when closing the recommendation. All safety recommendations must be taken into full consideration by all stakeholders to whom they are ad- dressed. In this context, the Agency maintains transparency with respects to its decisions and actions, in line with its safety mission. The Annual Safety Recommendations Review provides an overview on the follow-up performed by EASA in response to recommendations addressed to the Agency by Safety Investigation Authorities in relation to the in- vestigation of Accidents and Serious Incidents or with respect to safety studies. The first edition of this review was issued in 2007. This 9th edition shows the 2015 activity and presents: general statistical data of the safety recommendations addressed by safety investigation authorities to EASA in 2015. replies that EASA has given in 2015 to safety recommendations and safety issues that have been pro- cessed with actions taken. 2015 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Introduction PAGE 8 Since 2011 a process to assess and mitigate safety risks at European level has been established. At the heart of this system is the concept of safety risks management, namely hazards identification, risks assessment and deci- sion-making on the best course of action to mitigate those risks. EASA, Member States (MS) and industry work closely together in this process. At European level, this process is coordinated by the Agency and documented in the European Plan for Aviation Safety (EPAS). The EPAS identifies the key safety issues as well as the safety actions to resolve or mitigate the hazards. Safety recommendations are one of the key inputs to the safety risk management process. They provide informa- tion on the hazards as well as proposed solutions to mitigate the associated safety risks to the aviation system. CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 Safety CHAPTER 5 Recommendations ANNEX A. received in 2015 ANNEX B. ANNEX C. 2015 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Safety Recommendations
Recommended publications
  • Geschäftsbericht 2016 Inhalt
    Geschäftsbericht 2016 www.flughafenbern.ch Inhalt Organe 3 Organigramm 4 Bericht des Präsidenten 5 2016 im Überblick 6 | 7 Flughafenbetrieb 8 | 9 | 10 Administratives / Finanzielles 11 Bilanz 12 | 13 Besitzverhältnisse 13 Erfolgsrechnung 14 Anhang zur Jahresrechnung 15 | 16 Verwendung des Bilanzgewinnes 16 Bericht der Revisionsstelle 16 Flughafenpartner 17 | 18 | 19 Fördervereine 20 | 21 Verkehrsausweis 22 Flughafen Bern AG CH-3123 Belp Tel. +41 (0)31 960 21 11 Fax +41 (0)31 960 21 12 www.flughafenbern.ch [email protected] Organe 3 Verwaltungsrat Präsident Dr. Beat Brechbühl 1) 3) u Managing Partner, Kellerhals Carrard, Bern Vizepräsident Urs Sieber 1) u Ehemaliger EVP Swissport International Ltd., Stäfa Thomas E. Kern u Ehemaliger CEO Flughafen Zürich AG, Zumikon Helene Niedhart 1) u President und CEO Cat Aviation AG, Zürich Charles Riesen u Ehemaliger Direktor Alpar AG, Toffen Dr. Rudolf Stämpfli 2) u Mitinhaber und Verwaltungsratspräsident Stämpfli Gruppe AG, Bern Adrian Studer 3) u Vorsitzender der Geschäftsleitung beco Berner Wirtschaft, Bern Paul Thoma 1) 3) u Kommandant Lufttransportdienst des Bundes, Belp Jobst Wagner 2) u Verwaltungsratspräsident REHAU Gruppe, Muri 1) Mitglieder Comité Stratégique (Leitung Dr. B. Brechbühl) 2) Mitglieder Finanz-Ausschuss (Leitung Dr. R. Stämpfli) 3) Mitglieder VR-Ausschuss «Infrastruktur» (Leitung A. Studer) Geschäftsleitung CEO Dr. Mathias Gantenbein u Bern CFO Martin Leibundgut u Belp COO Heinz Kafader u Belp Revisionsstelle CORE Cotting Revisions AG u Bern 4 Organigramm Verwaltungsrat VR-Präsident
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Mit: Peter Pfister
    Interview mit: Peter Pfister Luftkampf: Die nationale Airline Swiss attackiert ihren Billigkonkurrenten Helvetic Airways. Statt Zusammenarbeit will die Swiss den zunehmend erfolgreicher werdenden Mitbewerber aus dem Markt drängen, indem sie auf erfolgreichen Helvetic-Destinationen wie Alicante Konkurrenzflüge anbietet. Bedeutet dies das Ende von Helvetic? CEO Peter Pfister erklärt gegenüber “persönlich” seine Strategie, sein Verhältnis zu Swiss und EasyJet sowie die Erfahrungen beim Gründen einer eigenen Airline. Interview: Matthias Ackeret, Oliver Prange Fotos: Marc Wetli “Ein Pilot hat etwa die Qualifikation eines Ingenieurs, und der verdient auch keine 200000 Franken. Ich sehe nicht ein, warum man einem Piloten so viel zahlen soll.” “Der Swiss-Angriff ist nicht gerade eine Kriegserklärung, aber ärgerlich.” “Im letzten Jahr waren die Rahmenbedingungen für eine neue Airline sehr gut: Es gab zu viele Flugzeuge, zu viele Piloten, zu viele Fachleute.” “Aktuell haben wir sechs Fokker-100 und eine MD-83. Ende August kommt noch eine weitere Fokker-100 dazu.” “Wenn Swiss sich als Premium Airline verkauft, dann muss sie auch eine Premium Airline sein.” “Im Prinzip muss der oberste Chef gar nicht so viel von der Fliegerei verstehen.” Herr Pfister, die Swiss bietet in Zukunft auch Flüge auf den gleichen Strecken wie Helvetic Airways an. Ist dies eine Kriegserklärung? “Eine Kriegserklärung nicht gerade, aber ärgerlich.” Wie beurteilen Sie diese Massnahme? “Die Swiss empfindet uns als Konkurrenten und unternimmt entsprechende Massnahmen, um uns in attraktiven Märkten anzugreifen. Erstaunlich ist jedoch, dass die Swiss genau diese Strecken vor kurzer Zeit aufgegeben hat.” Ist dies für Ihre Airline existenzbedrohend? “Existenzbedrohend nicht, aber ärgerlich, da die Swiss diese Strecken sicher nicht kostengünstiger als wir betreiben kann.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Organisations CH
    Swiss Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisations Approved i.a.w. (EC) No. 1321/2014 CAMO Principal Place of CAMO and CAO Organisations CAMO Typ Approval Business .Auth. Airw.Rev Aero Locarno SA CH.MG.5006 Gordola A to A X Aéro-Club des Montagnes Neuchâteloises / AOC CH.MG.5001 La Chaux-de-Fonds A to A X Fliegerschule Birrfeld AG CH.MG.5010 Birrfeld AG A to A X Flugschule Eichenberger AG CH.MG.5018 Buttwil AG A to A MFGZ CAMO Plus AG CH.MG.5031 Zürich Flughafen A to A X Motorfluggruppe Thurgau CH.MG.5030 Lommis TG A to A X Air Sarina AG CH.MG.5040 Saanen BE AOC X Air-Glaciers SA / AOC 1502 CH.MG.1502 Sion VS AOC X Albinati Aeronautics SA / AOC 1036 CH.MG.1036 GVA AOC X Aviathor GmbH CH.MG.1055 Oberdorf NW AOC x Cat Aviation SA / AOC 1004 CH.MG.1004 ZRH AOC X Chair Airlines Ltd / AOC 1052 CH.CAMO.1052 Glattbrugg AOC X Dasnair SA / AOC 1035 CH.MG.1035 GVA AOC X EasyJet Switzerland SA / AOC 1018 CH.CAMO.1018 BSL/GVA AOC X Edelweiss Air AG / AOC 1007 CH.MG.1007 ZRH AOC X ExecuJet Europe AG / AOC 1020 CH.MG.1020 ZRH AOC X Helvetic Airways SA / AOC 1033 CH.MG.1033 Zürich AOC X Jet Aviation Business Jets AG / AOC 1010 CH.CAMO.1010 BSL/GVA/ZRH AOC X Lions Air Skymedia AG / AOC 1501 CH.MG.1501 ZRH AOC X Nomad Aviation AG / AOC 1046 CH.MG.1046 Kloten AOC X Premium Jet (Club Aircharter) AG / AOC 1011 CH.MG.1011 ZRH AOC X Rabbit-Air AG / AOC 1026 CH.MG.1026 Bachenbülach ZH AOC X Swiss Air Ambulance Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerosuisse Aerosuisse the Environment the Environment
    CIVIL AVIATION AND CIVIL AVIATION AND AEROSUISSE AEROSUISSE THE ENVIRONMENT THE ENVIRONMENT NOISE LIST OF ITS 143 MEMBERS (as at 30th April 2016) Established in 1968, AEROSUISSE as umbrella association aims Breakdown of CO2 emissions by sector Aviation generates noise emissions too. However, the number of people to maintain the interests of the Swiss aerospace sector and to ensure exposed, in relation to other transport carriers, is rather low. Construction and, Aero-Club of Switzerland, Lucerne Dasnair SA, Geneva-Airport ISS Aviation AG, Zurich-Airport SPAS Seaplane Pilots Association its means of existence. It takes influence on the formation of the legal Switzerland, Lutry Exceeding the emission limit value pursuant to LSV: Other; 10% manufacturing industry; Aero Insurance Service AG, Zurich-Airport ddPConcepts GmbH, Ennetbürgen Japat AG / Novartis International AG, framework in the domain of aviation and space. Today, AEROSUISSE 16% Basel SR Technics Switzerland, Zurich-Airport Transport Carrier Exposed population over IGW 1) Aerolite AG, Ennetbürgen Dnata Switzerland AG, Kloten represents 143 companies and organisations including scheduled and Transport Aéroport de Neuchâtel SA, Colombier Dufry International AG, Basel Jet Aviation Management AG, SSIG Swiss Space Industries Group, charter airlines, international and regional airports, airfields, fixed base Day Night (excluding air Zurich-Airport Zurich operators, air traffic control, maintenance shops, aircraft and subcompo- Road 1’200’000 700’000 Aéroport de Sion, Sion Easyjet Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report No. 1953 by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau
    Büro für Flugunfalluntersuchungen BFU Bureau d’enquête sur les accidents d’aviation BEAA Ufficio d’inchiesta sugli infortuni aeronautici UIIA Uffizi d'inquisiziun per accidents d'aviatica UIAA Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau AAIB Final Report No. 1953 by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau concerning the incident to the Boeing 767-300 aircraft, HB-ISE operated by Belair Airlines under flight number BHP 902 on 21 February 2006 at Zurich Airport Bundeshaus Nord, CH-3003 Berne Final Report BHP 902 HB-ISE Ursachen Der Vorfall ist darauf zurückzuführen, dass technische Störungen am Boden dazu führten, dass auf dem Flughafen Zürich bei den herrschenden Wetterbedingungen eine Landung nicht mehr erlaubt war. Dies hatte zur Folge, dass die Flugbesatzung aufgrund des noch zur Ver- fügung stehenden Treibstoffes einen Anflug und eine Landung nach low visibility procedures durchführte, obwohl der Betrieb der Piste 16 auf CAT I beschränkt war. Zum Vorfall beigetragen hat der Umstand, dass die Information nicht übermittelt wurde, dass die Piste 14 für Anflüge und Landungen nach CAT III nicht zur Verfügung stand. Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau Page 2 of 37 Final Report BHP 902 HB-ISE General information on this report This report contains the AAIB’s conclusions on the circumstances and causes of the incident which is the subject of the investigation. In accordance with Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 7 December 1944 and article 24 of the Federal Air Navigation Law, the sole purpose of the investigation of an aircraft accident or serious incident is to prevent future accidents or serious incidents. The legal assessment of accident/incident causes and circumstances is expressly no concern of the accident investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebenslauf Personalien
    Seite 1 Lebenslauf Personalien Name Frischknecht Vorname Thomas Adresse 2assistU GmbH Technopark Badenerstrasse 13 CH-5200 Brugg AG Telefon +41 44 586 46 50 Mobile +41 79 699 21 54 E-Mail [email protected] Geburtsdatum 25.09.1968 in Herisau AR Zivilstand verheiratet, 3 Kinder Berufliche Erfahrung 06/2011 - open 2assistU GmbH, Brugg AG Geschäftsführer und Inhaber Ausbildung, Unternehmensmanagement und Projektmanagement in den Bereichen Security, Safety, Quality, Notfall-Management, Human Factors und Arbeitssicherheit 11/2007 – 12/2014 Belair Airlines AG, Glattbrugg ZH CEO / Accountable Manager Gesamtverantwortung für das Unternehmen mit 8 Flugzeugen und 300 Mitarbeitern, Schweizer Operator der airberlin group Seite 2 09/2006 – 10/2007 Belair Airlines AG, Glattbrugg ZH Chief Commercial Officer Mitglied der Geschäftsleitung, Führung der Bereiche Product Services, Verkauf, Marketing und Crewplanung, Stellvertreter des Geschäftsführers Führung von 10 Mitarbeitern 06/2003 – 07/2006 Helvetic Airways AG, Zürich Chief Commercial Officer Mitglied der Geschäftsleitung, Aufbau und Leitung des Kommerz (Produkt, Marketing, Verkauf und PR) Führung von 18 Mitarbeitern 11/2001 – 05/2003 Flughafen Zürich AG, Zürich Head of Airline & Cargo Marketing Mitglied der Kommerzleitung, Aufbau und Leitung der Abteilung Führung von 8 Mitarbeitern 08/2001 – 11/2001 Swissair AG, Zürich, Zürich Vice-President Network Planning Verantwortlich für Netzplanung, Scheduling und Distribution Führung von 45 Mitarbeitern 04/2001 – 07/2001 Swissair Group, Zürich
    [Show full text]
  • VADEMECUM 2014 Or Landing in an EU-Country, Thereby Including Non-European Airlines Too
    CIVIL AVIATION CIVIL AVIATION AND AEROSUISSE AEROSUISSE AEROSUISSE AND THE ENVIRONMENT THE ENVIRONMENT NOISE LIST OF ITS 135 MEMBERS (as at 30th April 2014) Established in 1968, AEROSUISSE as umbrella association aims to maintain the Breakdown of CO2 emissions by sector interests of the Swiss civil aerospace sector and to ensure its means of existence. Aviation generates noise emissions too. However, the number of people Aero-Club of Switzerland, Lucerne COREB Communauté régionale IG AirCargo, Zurich-Airport Schweiz. Gletscherpiloten-Vereinigung It takes influence on the formation of the legal framework in the domain of exposed, in relation to other transport carriers, is rather low. Aero Insurance Service AG, Zurich-Airport de la Broye, Payerne IG Berner Luftverkehr, Bern SGPV, Naters aviation and space. Today, AEROSUISSE represents about 140 companies and Construction and, Custodio AG, Zurich-Airport Sirius AG, Zurich-Airport organisations including scheduled and charter airlines, international and regional Exceeding the emission limit value pursuant to LSV: Aerolite Max Bucher AG, Ennetbürgen IG Flughafen Zürich, Zurich-Airport airports, airfields, fixed base operators, air traffic control, maintenance shops, Other; 10% manufacturing industry; Darwin Airline SA, Lugano skyguide, swiss air navigation services ltd., 1) Aéroport de Neuchâtel SA, Colombier IG Luftverkehr Vereinigung Pro aircraft and subcomponents manufacturers, companies within the space industry, Transport Carrier Exposed population over IGW 16% Geneva Aéroport de Sion, Sion Dasnair SA, Geneva-Airport EuroAirport, Basel flight training schools as well as all influential aviation associations and other Day Night Transport Dnata Switzerland AG, Kloten ISS Aviation AG, Zurich-Airport Sky Jet AG, Zurich-Airport companies being related to aerospace in a broader sense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avalanche Victim Resuscitation Checklist, a Victims with Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) in the Period
    The Avalanche Victim Resuscitation Checklist MED-REC0033 / Alpine Medicine Commission / December 31, 2014 1/3 Resuscitation 91 (2015) e7–e8 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Resuscitation j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/resuscitation Letter to the Editor The Avalanche Victim Resuscitation Checklist, a victims with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the period 4 new concept for the management of avalanche 1987–2009. Data of key parameters were incomplete, overall victims survival was very low, and initiation of CPR was lower than expected for patients with long burials and patent airways. The Sir, reasons to initiate or withhold resuscitation remained unclear in the majority of cases. Deficiencies in awareness of the guidelines The International Commission for Mountain Emergency by bystanders, first responders and hospital personnel, and the Medicine (ICAR MEDCOM) established official consensus guidelines transfer of essential information from the accident site to hospital 1 on the onsite treatment of avalanche victims in 2002 and 2013. may have been partially responsible for the poor outcome. These aim to inform basic and advanced life support providers of the Although existing management guidelines are simple, utiliz- best evidence-based management, as selected severely hypother- ing the theoretical knowledge and making the right decisions can mic victims in cardiac arrest can survive with a good neurologic be very challenging in the stressful environment of an avalanche 2 outcome even after several hours of burial. Key parameters for where major decisions, such as starting or withholding resusci- an avalanche victim in cardiac arrest are duration of burial, airway tation, are being taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Technical and Medical Requirements for HEMS
    Kottmann et al. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (2018) 26:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0520-3 ORIGINALRESEARCH Open Access Identification of the technical and medical requirements for HEMS avalanche rescue missions through a 15-year retrospective analysis in a HEMS in Switzerland: a necessary step for quality improvement Alexandre Kottmann1,2* , Pierre-Nicolas Carron1, Lorenz Theiler2,3, Roland Albrecht2, Mario Tissi2 and Mathieu Pasquier1 Abstract Background: Avalanche rescues mostly rely on helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) and include technical rescue and complex medical situations under difficult conditions. The adequacy of avalanche victim management has been shown to be unexpectedly low, suggesting the need for quality improvement. We analyse the technical rescue and medical competency requirements of HEMS crewmembers for avalanche rescue missions, as well as their clinical exposure. The study aims to identify areas that should be the focus of future quality improvement efforts. Methods: This 15-year retrospective study of avalanche rescue by the Swiss HEMS Rega includes all missions where at least one patient had been caught by an avalanche, found within 24 h of the alarm being raised, and transported. Results: Our analyses included 422 missions (596 patients). Crews were frequently confronted with technical rescue aspects, including winching (29%) and patient location and extrication (48%), as well as multiple casualty accidents (32%). Forty-seven percent of the patients suffered potential or overt vital threat; 29% were in cardiac arrest. The on-site medical management of the victims required a large array of basic and advanced medical skills. Clinical exposure was low, as 56% of the physicians were involved in only one avalanche rescue mission over the study period.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau
    Federal Department of Environment, Transport Energy and Communications No. u1793 Investigation Report of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau on the accident to aircraft AVRO 146-RJ100, HB-IXM, operated by Crossair under flight number CRX 3597, on 24 November 2001 near Bassersdorf/ZH This report has been prepared for the purpose of accident/incident prevention. The le- gal assessment of accident/incident causes and circumstances is no subject of the ac- cident investigation (Art. 24 Air Navigation Law). The language of the valid formulation of this report is German. Within 30 days after receipt of the investigation report, any person giving proof of a well-founded interest in the investigation result may request the report to be examinated by the Review Board (Eidg. Flug- unfallkommission – EFUK) for completeness and conclusiveness. Bundeshaus Nord, CH-3003 Berne Investigation report CRX 3597 Ve 23.01.04 Table of contents Brief presentation........................................................................................................10 Investigation ...............................................................................................................11 1 Factual information ..........................................................................13 1.1 Prior history and history of the flight ..........................................................13 1.1.1 Prior history...................................................................................................................13 1.1.1.1 Aircraft .....................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth Session of the Statistics Division
    STA/10-WP/6 International Civil Aviation Organization 2/10/09 WORKING PAPER TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION Montréal, 23 to 27 November 2009 Agenda Item 1: Civil aviation statistics — ICAO classification and definition REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS OF DOMESTIC AND CABOTAGE AIR SERVICES (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY Currently, ICAO uses two different definitions to identify the traffic of domestic flight sectors of international flights; one used by the Statistics Programme, based on the nature of a flight stage, and the other, used for the economic studies on air transport, based on the origin and final destination of a flight (with one or more flight stages). Both definitions have their shortcomings and may affect traffic forecasts produced by ICAO for domestic operations. A similar situation arises with the current inclusion of cabotage services under international operations. After reviewing these issues, the Fourteenth Meeting of the Statistics Panel (STAP/14) agreed to recommend that no changes be made to the current definitions and instructions. Action by the division is in paragraph 5. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In its activities in the field of air transport economics and statistics, ICAO is currently using two different definitions to identify the domestic services of an air carrier. The first one used by the Statistics Programme has been reaffirmed and clarified during Ninth Meeting of the Statistics Division (STA/9) and it is the one currently shown in the Air Transport Reporting Forms. The second one is being used by the Secretariat in the studies on international airline operating economics which have been carried out since 1976 and in pursuance of Assembly Resolution A36-15, Appendix G (reproduced in Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Preise in CHF Pro Person Inklusive Transfers, Flughafen- Und Sicherheitstaxen, Aktuelle Treibstoffzuschläge
    1 / 7 16.04.2015 7 N. Faro ab 98.- 23./30.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Nurflug 98 26.04. SO ZRH Air Berlin Nurflug 149 23./30.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Vitors Village, Ferragudo 4* B2/2 RO 249 23.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Tivoli Carvoeiro, Carvoeiro 4* A2/2 BB 349 26.04. SO ZRH Air Berlin Jardim do Vau, Portimao 3* A4/2 SC 349 30.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Jardim do Vau, Portimao 3* A4/2 SC 349 23./30.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Vale d'Oliveiras Quinta Resort Spa, Carvoeiro 5* A2/2 BB 399 26.04. SO ZRH Air Berlin Hotel Pestana Palm Gardens, Carvoeiro/Lagoa 4* A2/2 RO 399 26.04. SO ZRH Air Berlin Tivoli Carvoeiro, Carvoeiro 4* A2/2 BB 399 26.04. SO ZRH Air Berlin Vale d'Oliveiras Quinta Resort Spa, Carvoeiro 5* A2/2 BB 449 23.04. DO ZRH Air Berlin Adriana Beach Club & Resort, Albufeira 4* A2/2 AI 549 7./21.05. DO ZRH Air Berlin Nurflug 149 3./10./17.05. SO ZRH Air Berlin Nurflug 149 3.05. SO ZRH Air Berlin Vitors Village, Ferragudo 4* B2/2 RO 349 3./10.05. SO ZRH Air Berlin Tivoli Carvoeiro, Carvoeiro 4* A2/2 BB 399 7.05. DO ZRH Air Berlin Jardim do Vau, Portimao 3* A4/2 SC 399 7./21.05. DO ZRH Air Berlin Tivoli Carvoeiro, Carvoeiro 4* A2/2 BB 399 3./10./17.05. SO ZRH Air Berlin Pestana Viking, Porches 4* B2/2 BB 449 21.05.
    [Show full text]