DOCSLIB.ORG

Unique Abilities of Hopper Spacecraft to Enable National Objectives for Solar System Exploration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unique Abilities of Hopper Spacecraft to Enable National Objectives for Solar System Exploration UNIQUE ABILITIES OF HOPPER SPACECRAFT TO ENABLE NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION EPHRAIM ROBERT LANFORD B.S. Engineering Harvey Mudd College, 2006 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TECHNOLOGY AND POLICY and MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © 2011 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of author: Technology and Policy Program Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics January 27, 2011 Certified by: Jeffrey A. Hoffman Professor of the Practice of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Certified by: John Danis Group Leader, Mission Architectures and Applications Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Accepted by: Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Engineering Systems, MacVicar Faculty Fellow Director of Technology and Policy Program Accepted by: Eytan H. Modiano Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2 UNIQUE ABILITIES OF HOPPER SPACECRAFT TO ENABLE NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION Ephraim Robert Lanford B.S. Engineering Harvey Mudd College, 2006 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on January 27, 2011 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT In comparison with conventional and other conceived approaches, hopper spacecraft offer unique advantages in exploring Solar System objects beyond Earth. The present work began with a survey – based on documents from the White House, Congress, NASA, and the international planetary science community – of exploration plans and objectives in the United States. The results are presented, and lead into a representative description of goals that might be enabled by hoppers. Relevant hopper attributes are then described in comparison to other vehicle types, and these vehicle characteristics are mapped to the exploration goals to show how hoppers can facilitate achievement of policy and science objectives. Specific examples are examined by formulating and analyzing a demonstrative and timely variety of model missions on Earth’s Moon, Mars, and Saturn’s moon Titan. These analyses use models for both hovering and ballistic hops to produce realistic values for hopper performance including mass, fuel consumption, trajectory characteristics, and basic spacecraft subsystem characteristics. In sum, planetary hopper technology is not for every mission, but generally offers paradigm- changing mobility and flexibility for small additional mass or development costs. Mission planners should evaluate hoppers for suitability to their exploration goals. Policy recommendations are offered toward this purpose. Thesis Supervisor: Professor Jeffrey A. Hoffman Professor of the Practice MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Advisor: John Danis Group Leader, Mission Architectures and Applications Charles Stark Draper Laboratory 3 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Jeff Hoffman for his guidance and relaxed but demanding demeanor. John Danis, my Draper Laboratory Fellow advisor, deserves the next mention for his profuse helpfulness and enthusiasm for my work. Draper Laboratory as a whole has been very generous and supportive of my research. Bobby Cohanim has also been critical to my progress, success, and sanity; I thank him for his assistance and friendship. From even before my involvement with hoppers, Phillip Cunio has been a stimulating and insightful collaborator. Beyond these, I would like to thank the entire Talaris team at MIT for providing me with ideas, aid, and a fulfilling research project. Next, my colleagues Dan Fulcoly, Ben Corbin, Akil Middleton, and Wendelin Michel all offered advice and contributed to the analytical portions of this thesis. Outside of the aerospace and astronautics world at MIT, my home has been the Technology and Policy Program. For my happy time there I have first to thank Sydney Miller, Frank Field, Ed Ballo, and Dava Newman, for bringing me in, giving me the program I was really looking for, and helping me with the details along the way. In that realm of details, I could not have managed without the helpful people scattered in financial and administrative offices across the Institute. I am also indebted to the MIT Space, Policy, and Society Group, where I began my work space policy, and the fine people in the Space and Science Branch at the Office of Management and Budget who allowed me to intern there one summer. Above all I must express my gratitude to my friends in Cambridge and elsewhere, who have made my time here immensely rewarding, and my family, who got me off to a fine start and have been great comrades ever since. Finally, thanks to Daft Punk for writing the soundtrack to the homestretch of my master’s student career. 4 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 4 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................... 7 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter I: Introduction ................................................................................................ 11 I.1. Introduction........................................................................................................ 11 I.2. Description of Sections to Follow ....................................................................... 11 I.3. Background ......................................................................................................... 12 1.3.1 Hopper definition ........................................................................................ 12 1.3.2 History of hoppers ...................................................................................... 12 1.3.3 Project Talaris ............................................................................................. 13 I.4. Methodology ...................................................................................................... 14 1.4.1 The Logic and Process ................................................................................. 14 1.4.2 “Hoptimizer” Model for Hovering Hops ..................................................... 15 1.4.3 BallisticHop Model for Ballistic Hops .......................................................... 21 Chapter II: Objectives for Solar System Exploration ..................................................... 30 II.1. Policy Objectives ................................................................................................ 30 2.1.1 How Solar System Exploration Policy Works .............................................. 30 2.1.2 Important Issues in Planetary Exploration Policy ....................................... 37 2.1.3 Policy Objectives Summary and Outlook .................................................... 42 II.2. Science Objectives .............................................................................................. 43 2.2.1 Sources of Exploration Science Objectives ................................................. 43 2.2.2 Fundamental Questions that Underpin Solar System Exploration ............. 44 2.2.3 Solar System Destinations and Related Goals ............................................ 48 2.2.4 Science Objectives Summary ...................................................................... 53 Chapter III: Matching Vehicle Attributes to Exploration Objectives ............................. 54 III.1. Planetary Exploration Vehicles and Their Attributes ..................................... 54 III.2. Hopper Attributes ........................................................................................... 56 III.3. Destination and Mission Attributes ................................................................ 60 III.4. Vehicle Attributes Mapped to Exploration Objectives ................................... 63 3.4.1 Mapping Hoppers to Destination and Mission Attributes .......................... 63 3.4.2 Mapping Hoppers to Policy Objectives ....................................................... 65 3.4.3 Mapping Hoppers to Science Objectives .................................................... 65 III.5. Chapter Summary ........................................................................................... 68 Chapter IV: Model Missions ........................................................................................... 70 IV.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 70 IV.2. Earth’s Moon .................................................................................................. 71 4.2.1 A Hopper to Emplace the International Lunar Network? ........................... 72 4.2.2 Hopping in and out of Permanently Shadowed Regions on the Moon ...... 79 4.2.3 Lunar Pits....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Teacher's Guide
    A Teacher’s Guide for LIFE on Earth – and Beyond: An Astrobiologist’s Quest About the Book: Astrobiologists have searched Earth’s most extreme environments in their quest to understand what factors are necessary to sustain life. Dr. Chris McKay’s scientific journey has taken him from the freezing cold of Antarctica’s Dry Valleys to the rocky wasteland of the Atacama Desert in Chile to the permafrost-covered tundra of Siberia. By studying environments on Earth that resemble those on Mars and elsewhere in the solar system, Dr. McKay hopes that his experiments will help answer the ultimate question: is there life beyond Earth? About the Author: Pamela Turner has written for kids and young adults, mostly about science and nature. She also has a strong interest in multicultural literature because she’s lived in and worked in Kenya, South Africa, Japan, the Philippines, and the Marshall Islands. Hardback ISBN 978-1580891332 Honors and Awards: School Library Journal starred review, Booklist starred review, Bank Street College of Education Best Books List, AAAS/Subaru Science Writing Prize Prize finalist, Booklist Top Ten Sci-Tech Books for Youth, NSTA Outstanding Science Trade Book, Booklist Editors’ Choice, CCBC Choice. Booklist Starred Review: "Astrobiologists look outward from the Earth seeking evidence of life elsewhere in the Universe. But, as this fascinating book shows, they also travel to places on Earth where extreme conditions may be similar to those on distant worlds... Turner's absorbing account gives enough detail to create vivid impressions of McKay's explorations and enough background information to show what his amazing findings imply.
    [Show full text]
  • How Doc Draper Became the Father of Inertial Guidance
    (Preprint) AAS 18-121 HOW DOC DRAPER BECAME THE FATHER OF INERTIAL GUIDANCE Philip D. Hattis* With Missouri roots, a Stanford Psychology degree, and a variety of MIT de- grees, Charles Stark “Doc” Draper formulated the basis for reliable and accurate gyro-based sensing technology that enabled the first and many subsequent iner- tial navigation systems. Working with colleagues and students, he created an Instrumentation Laboratory that developed bombsights that changed the balance of World War II in the Pacific. His engineering teams then went on to develop ever smaller and more accurate inertial navigation for aircraft, submarines, stra- tegic missiles, and spaceflight. The resulting inertial navigation systems enable national security, took humans to the Moon, and continue to find new applica- tions. This paper discusses the history of Draper’s path to becoming known as the “Father of Inertial Guidance.” FROM DRAPER’S MISSOURI ROOTS TO MIT ENGINEERING Charles Stark Draper was born in 1901 in Windsor Missouri. His father was a dentist and his mother (nee Stark) was a school teacher. The Stark family developed the Stark apple that was popular in the Midwest and raised the family to prominence1 including a cousin, Lloyd Stark, who became governor of Missouri in 1937. Draper was known to his family and friends as Stark (Figure 1), and later in life was known by colleagues as Doc. During his teenage years, Draper enjoyed tinkering with automobiles. He also worked as an electric linesman (Figure 2), and at age 15 began a liberal arts education at the University of Mis- souri in Rolla.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE RESEARCH in POLAND Report to COMMITTEE
    SPACE RESEARCH IN POLAND Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) 2020 Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Report to COMMITTEE ON SPACE RESEARCH (COSPAR) ISBN 978-83-89439-04-8 First edition © Copyright by Space Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences and The Committee on Space and Satellite Research PAS Warsaw, 2020 Editor: Iwona Stanisławska, Aneta Popowska Report to COSPAR 2020 1 SATELLITE GEODESY Space Research in Poland 3 1. SATELLITE GEODESY Compiled by Mariusz Figurski, Grzegorz Nykiel, Paweł Wielgosz, and Anna Krypiak-Gregorczyk Introduction This part of the Polish National Report concerns research on Satellite Geodesy performed in Poland from 2018 to 2020. The activity of the Polish institutions in the field of satellite geodesy and navigation are focused on the several main fields: • global and regional GPS and SLR measurements in the frame of International GNSS Service (IGS), International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS), International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS), European Reference Frame Permanent Network (EPN), • Polish geodetic permanent network – ASG-EUPOS, • modeling of ionosphere and troposphere, • practical utilization of satellite methods in local geodetic applications, • geodynamic study, • metrological control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) equipment, • use of gravimetric satellite missions, • application of GNSS in overland, maritime and air navigation, • multi-GNSS application in geodetic studies. Report
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Books and reports Blandford, R.D. (Chair) New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council, 2010 Bondi, Hermann. et al Pioneering in Outer Space Heinemann Educational Books, 1971 Clarke, Arthur C. The Exploration of Space Temple Press, London, 1951 Department of Energy/NASA Satellite Power Systems Concept Development and Evaluation Program. DoE/NASA, October 1978 http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/1978DOESPS-ReferenceSystemReport.pdf Satellite Power Systems (SPS) Space Transportation Cost Analysis and Evaluation. DoE/NASA, November 1980 http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/1980DOESPS- SpaceTransportationCostAnalysis.pdf Dick, Steven J. (editor) Remembering the Space Age: Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Conference. NASA SP-2008-4703, 2008 http://history.nasa.gov/Remembering_Space_Age_A.pdf © Springer International Publishing AG 2017 235 M. van Pelt, Dream Missions, Springer Praxis Books, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53941-6 236 Bibliography Dyson, George Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship Henry Holt & Company, Inc., USA, 2002 Ehricke, Krafft A. Solar Transportation In Space Age in Fiscal Year 2001, Proceedings of the Fourth AAS Goddard Memorial Symposium American Astronautical Society, 1966 Friedman, Louis. Human Spaceflight, from Mars to the Stars The University of Arizona Press, 2015 Gatland, Kenneth W. & Bono, Philip Frontiers of Space Blandford Press, UK, 1969 Hansen, James R. Chapter 9, Skipping “The Next Logical Step” in Spaceflight Revolution; NASA Langley Research Center from Sputnik to Apollo NASA History Series SP-4308, USA, 1994 http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch9.htm Koelle, Heinz-Hermann. Nova and Beyond, a Review of Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Concepts in the Post-Saturn Class Technical University Berlin, Germany, 2001 Konecci, Eugene B.
    [Show full text]
  • On Orbital Debris JEFF FOUST, COLLEGE PARK, Md
    NOVEMBER 24, 2014 SPOTLIGHT Clyde Space See page 12 www.spacenews.com VOLUME 25 ISSUE 46 $4.95 ($7.50 Non-U.S.) PROFILE/22> YVONNE PENDLETON DIRECTOR, SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION RESEARCH VIRTUAL INSTITUTE INSIDE THIS ISSUE LAUNCH INDUSTRY Swift Development of Ariane 6 Urged Applauding the end of a French-German impasse over the Ariane 6 rocket, the European Satellite Operators Association said the vehicle needs to be in service as quickly as possible. See story, page 8 ATK Hints at Antares Engine Selection Alliant Techsystems Chief Executive Mark DeYoung said there are no near-term liquid- propulsion alternatives to Russian engines for U.S. rockets. See story, page 6 ESA PHOTO Virginia May Seek Federal Funds for Wallops > “We have found a compromise that is OK for both countries, for the other participating states and also for industry,” Brigitte Zypries (above), Germany’s Virginia’s two U.S. senators said they may seek federal funds to cover $20 million in repairs to the space minister, said of an agreement under which Germany and France will back the Ariane 6 rocket and scrap the Ariane 5 Midlife Evolution. Wallops Island launch pad damaged when Orbital Sciences’ Antares exploded. See story, page 6 MILITARY SPACE Protected Tactical Waveform Taking Shape German-French Compromise The U.S. Air Force is expected to demonstrate its protected tactical waveform in new modems and reworked terminals as early as 2018. See story, page 11 U.S. To Grant Indirect Access to Space Fence Paves Direct Path to Ariane 6 The Pentagon’s international space surveillance partners will have indirect access to data from the Air Force’s next-generation Space Fence tracking system.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics a Hipparcos Study of the Hyades
    A&A 367, 111–147 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000410 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics A Hipparcos study of the Hyades open cluster Improved colour-absolute magnitude and Hertzsprung{Russell diagrams J. H. J. de Bruijne, R. Hoogerwerf, and P. T. de Zeeuw Sterrewacht Leiden, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 13 June 2000 / Accepted 24 November 2000 Abstract. Hipparcos parallaxes fix distances to individual stars in the Hyades cluster with an accuracy of ∼6per- cent. We use the Hipparcos proper motions, which have a larger relative precision than the trigonometric paral- laxes, to derive ∼3 times more precise distance estimates, by assuming that all members share the same space motion. An investigation of the available kinematic data confirms that the Hyades velocity field does not contain significant structure in the form of rotation and/or shear, but is fully consistent with a common space motion plus a (one-dimensional) internal velocity dispersion of ∼0.30 km s−1. The improved parallaxes as a set are statistically consistent with the Hipparcos parallaxes. The maximum expected systematic error in the proper motion-based parallaxes for stars in the outer regions of the cluster (i.e., beyond ∼2 tidal radii ∼20 pc) is ∼<0.30 mas. The new parallaxes confirm that the Hipparcos measurements are correlated on small angular scales, consistent with the limits specified in the Hipparcos Catalogue, though with significantly smaller “amplitudes” than claimed by Narayanan & Gould. We use the Tycho–2 long time-baseline astrometric catalogue to derive a set of independent proper motion-based parallaxes for the Hipparcos members.
    [Show full text]
  • Alactic Observer
    alactic Observer G John J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 14, No. 2 February 2021 International Space Station transit of the Moon Composite image: Marc Polansky February Astronomy Calendar and Space Exploration Almanac Bel'kovich (Long 90° E) Hercules (L) and Atlas (R) Posidonius Taurus-Littrow Six-Day-Old Moon mosaic Apollo 17 captured with an antique telescope built by John Benjamin Dancer. Dancer is credited with being the first to photograph the Moon in Tranquility Base England in February 1852 Apollo 11 Apollo 11 and 17 landing sites are visible in the images, as well as Mare Nectaris, one of the older impact basins on Mare Nectaris the Moon Altai Scarp Photos: Bill Cloutier 1 John J. McCarthy Observatory In This Issue Page Out the Window on Your Left ........................................................................3 Valentine Dome ..............................................................................................4 Rocket Trivia ..................................................................................................5 Mars Time (Landing of Perseverance) ...........................................................7 Destination: Jezero Crater ...............................................................................9 Revisiting an Exoplanet Discovery ...............................................................11 Moon Rock in the White House....................................................................13 Solar Beaming Project ..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office May 1988
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE MAY 1988 A SPECIAL STUDY THE NASA PROGRAM IN THE 1990s AND BEYOND The Congress of the United States Congresssional Budget Of'f'ice NOTES All costs are expressed in 1988 dollars of budget authority, unless otherwise noted. All years are fiscal years, except when applied to launch schedules. PREFACE The United States space program stands at a crossroads. The momentum of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) program over the last 20 years has brought NASA to a point where new activities will require substantial increases in the agency's budget. Critics of the NASA program have called for even more ambi- tious goals, most prominently an expansion of manned space flight to the Moon or Mars. Fiscal concerns, however, may limit even the more modest set of activities envisioned by NASA. This special study, requested by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans- portation, examines the broad options for the U.S. space program in the 1990s. In keeping with the mandate of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to provide objective nonpartisan analysis, the report makes no recommendations. David H. Moore, of CBO's Natural Resources and Commerce Division, prepared the report under the supervision of Everett M. Ehrlich. Frances M. Lussier of CBO's National Security Division and Michael Sieverts of CBO's Budget Analysis Division provided valu- able comments and assistance. Many outside reviewers made useful comments and criticisms. Amanda Balestrieri edited the manuscript. Margaret Cromartie prepared early drafts of the report, and Kathryn Quattrone prepared the final draft for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Yet Uncontrolled Re-Entries of the Cluster-Ii Spacecraft
    PLANNED YET UNCONTROLLED RE-ENTRIES OF THE CLUSTER-II SPACECRAFT Stijn Lemmens(1), Klaus Merz(1), Quirin Funke(1) , Benoit Bonvoisin(2), Stefan Löhle(3), Henrik Simon(1) (1) European Space Agency, Space Debris Office, Robert-Bosch-Straße 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany, Email:[email protected] (2) European Space Agency, Materials & Processes Section, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, Netherlands (3) Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme, Pfaffenwaldring 29, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany ABSTRACT investigate the physical connection between the Sun and Earth. Flying in a tetrahedral formation, the four After an in-depth mission analysis review the European spacecraft collect detailed data on small-scale changes Space Agency’s (ESA) four Cluster II spacecraft in near-Earth space and the interaction between the performed manoeuvres during 2015 aimed at ensuring a charged particles of the solar wind and Earth's re-entry for all of them between 2024 and 2027. This atmosphere. In order to explore the magnetosphere was done to contain any debris from the re-entry event Cluster II spacecraft occupy HEOs with initial near- to southern latitudes and hence minimise the risk for polar with orbital period of 57 hours at a perigee altitude people on ground, which was enabled by the relative of 19 000 km and apogee altitude of 119 000 km. The stability of the orbit under third body perturbations. four spacecraft have a cylindrical shape completed by Small differences in the highly eccentric orbits of the four long flagpole antennas. The diameter of the four spacecraft will lead to various different spacecraft is 2.9 m with a height of 1.3 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar System Exploration: a Vision for the Next Hundred Years
    IAC-04-IAA.3.8.1.02 SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION: A VISION FOR THE NEXT HUNDRED YEARS R. L. McNutt, Jr. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT The current challenge of space travel is multi-tiered. It includes continuing the robotic assay of the solar system while pressing the human frontier beyond cislunar space, with Mars as an ob- vious destination. The primary challenge is propulsion. For human voyages beyond Mars (and perhaps to Mars), the refinement of nuclear fission as a power source and propulsive means will likely set the limits to optimal deep space propulsion for the foreseeable future. Costs, driven largely by access to space, continue to stall significant advances for both manned and unmanned missions. While there continues to be a hope that commercialization will lead to lower launch costs, the needed technology, initial capital investments, and markets have con- tinued to fail to materialize. Hence, initial development in deep space will likely remain govern- ment sponsored and driven by scientific goals linked to national prestige and perceived security issues. Against this backdrop, we consider linkage of scientific goals, current efforts, expecta- tions, current technical capabilities, and requirements for the detailed exploration of the solar system and consolidation of off-Earth outposts. Over the next century, distances of 50 AU could be reached by human crews but only if resources are brought to bear by international consortia. INTRODUCTION years hence, if that much3, usually – and rightly – that policy goals and technologies "Where there is no vision the people perish.” will change so radically on longer time scales – Proverbs, 29:181 that further extrapolation must be relegated to the realm of science fiction – or fantasy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumba, Salsa, Smaba and Tango in the Magnetosphere
    ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 2 r bulletin 107 — august 2001 42 ESCOUBET 24-08-2001 13:29 Page 3 the cluster quartet’s first year in space Rumba, Salsa, Samba and Tango in the Magnetosphere - The Cluster Quartet’s First Year in Space C.P. Escoubet & M. Fehringer Solar System Division, Space Science Department, ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, Noordwijk, The Netherlands P. Bond Cranleigh, Surrey, United Kingdom Introduction Launch and commissioning phase Cluster is one of the two missions – the other When the first Soyuz blasted off from the being the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory Baikonur Cosmodrome on 16 July 2000, we (SOHO) – constituting the Solar Terrestrial knew that Cluster was well on the way to Science Programme (STSP), the first recovery from the previous launch setback. ‘Cornerstone’ of ESA’s Horizon 2000 However, it was not until the second launch on Programme. The Cluster mission was first 9 August 2000 and the proper injection of the proposed in November 1982 in response to an second pair of spacecraft into orbit that we ESA Call for Proposals for the next series of knew that the Cluster mission was truly back scientific missions. on track (Fig. 1). In fact, the experimenters said that they knew they had an ideal mission only The four Cluster spacecraft were successfully launched in pairs by after switching on their last instruments on the two Russian Soyuz rockets on 16 July and 9 August 2000. On 14 fourth spacecraft. August, the second pair joined the first pair in highly eccentric polar orbits, with an apogee of 19.6 Earth radii and a perigee of 4 Earth radii.
    [Show full text]