DOCSLIB.ORG

Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Government Performance and Results Act FY 2001 Report Introducing the “Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Performance Report for FY 2001” It is with considerable pleasure that the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) of the National Science Foundation presents its FY 2001 GPRA Performance Report. In this Report we offer a small sample of examples of support for research and education fulfilling the Outcome Goals of the National Science Foundation. The broad portfolio of research and educational activities supported by the Directorate has resulted in a number of remarkable discoveries that have attracted the attention of the press and the public. These discoveries are only, of course, small pieces of a puzzle ultimately leading to development of a fuller, more accurate understanding of the world and universe we inhabit. Progress in the mathematical and physical sciences is, of course, linked to other disciplines, and there are many examples of work jointly supported with other NSF Directorates of other agencies. In addition, the development of technology and progress in all fields of research are closely related, We wish to emphasize, however, that in all the research highlighted here, the education of future citizens and future scientists is becoming an integral component. The Directorate supports thousands of graduate students and postdoctoral students in the physical sciences. These individuals will form a major portion of the leadership of the physical sciences community in the coming decades. We are committed to making the results of the research we support available and understandable to the general public. We are also attempting to increase the involvement of our community with teachers and with students in grades K-12. It is essential that our community become involved in improving the mathematical and science skills of all Americans. The report gives a number of examples of this type of activity. I’m sure you’ll agree this Report illustrates that MPS is not only alive and well, but that the research it is supporting is dramatic and forward-looking. I encourage you to contact us should you require further information on any aspect of the material contained within the Report. Robert A. Eisenstein Assistant Director for Mathematical and Physical Sciences ii Contents Introduction 1 III. Outcome Goal: Tools Funding Priorities 4 Introduction Tools - 1 The Relationship of Resources to Outcomes 4 Performance Indicators Tools - 2 Organizational Highlights 4 COV Assessments Tools - 2 Independent Assessments of MPS Divisions 5 Indicator 1 Tools - 3 Cross-cutting and Coordination Activities 9 Indicator 2 Tools - 16 High-Risk Investment Areas 16 Indicator 3 Tools - 19 Areas of Special Emphasis in FY 2000 17 IV. Tables I. Outcome Goal: People Table 1 – External Evaluations T - 1 Introduction People - 1 Table 2 – COV Schedules T - 5 Performance Indicators People - 4 Table 3 – COV Outcome Results T- 6 COV Assessments People - 4 Table 4 – Management Goals T - 9 Indicator 1 People - 7 Table 5 – Investment Goals T- 10 Indicator 2 People - 11 Table 6 – Use of Merit Review by Division of Chemistry (CHE) T - 14 Indicator 3 People - 16 Table 7 – Use of Merit Review by Indicator 4 People - 25 Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS) T - 20 II. Outcome Goal: Ideas Introduction Ideas - 1 Performance Indicators Ideas - 7 COV Assessments Ideas - 7 Indicator 1 Ideas - 9 Indicator 2 Ideas - 19 Indicator 3 Ideas - 36 Indicator 4 Ideas - 45 iii Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences GPRA Performance Report FY 2001 The Directorate for Mathematical and Physical budget justifications, press releases and related Sciences (MPS) supports a strong and diverse media materials, divisional annual reports, and portfolio of research and education in formal external evaluations. mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, and materials research. The purpose of this work is The Division of Chemistry both to deepen our understanding of the physical universe and to use that understanding in service The mission of the Division of Chemistry (CHE) to society both as a means of intellectual is to promote the health of academic chemistry enrichment and as a wellspring to future and to enable research and education in economic development. The mathematical and chemistry at the highest possible professional, physical sciences, supported across all Federal technical, and creative levels. agencies, serve as the training ground for at least half of all doctoral scientists now employed in The Division of Chemistry provides about one- U.S. industry. quarter of Federal research funds for academic chemistry. The National Institutes of Health The Directorate places a high priority on provide about one-third of the Federal funds for multidisciplinary work and on partnerships. academic chemistry, narrowly targeted to Within MPS the Office of Multidisciplinary projects that directly benefit biomedical research. Activities serves as a catalyst in emerging areas The chemical and allied processes industries of research and education at disciplinary (including pharmaceuticals) have sales of over boundaries. $400 billion and invest about $18 billion per year in research. This industry segment employs about 94,300 scientists and engineers. In International partnerships are critical in the work addition, other industries such as semiconductor, MPS supports, especially in astronomy, physics, transportation, and agriculture, support and and materials research, all of which require large depend on chemistry research. These industry facilities in order to carry out state-of-the-art investments in research are usually short-term research. A critical objective of MPS is world and targeted to a narrow purpose. Thus, the leadership in the sciences MPS supports, and, Division is the only significant source of funds to over the years, numerous MPS-supported build the knowledge base and educate the future researchers have received the Nobel Prize or workforce on which this large, diverse, and other awards of high international standing. economically important enterprise depends. Postdoctoral training, Research Experiences for The Division places a high priority on support Undergraduate (REU) sites, graduate student for high risk-high potential research, for traineeships, national facilities and centers, adequate funding of academic investigators at the partnerships with the Directorate for Education beginning of their careers, for support and and Human Resources (EHR), and workshops encouragement of chemists who are members of and conferences are means through which the underrepresented groups, and for projects Directorate for Mathematical and Physical integrating research and education. The Division Sciences helps develop the nation’s next is extensively involved in interdisciplinary and generation of scientists and engineers. crosscutting NSF-wide programs. All Programs and Divisions within the MPS The total FY 2001 Current Plan funding is Directorate have provided background $153.46 million. information for this report. Other sources include project reports, FY 2001 COV reports, Introduction - 1 The Division of Mathematical Sciences priority area in the mathematical sciences with the first year of a 5-year investment strategy The Division of Mathematical Sciences (DMS) beginning in FY 2003. To jumpstart this supports over 65 percent of Federal academic investment, the Division is targeted with an investments in the mathematical sciences. additional $20M increase in FY 2002. At this date the precise budget for this priority area has Today's advances in science and engineering, not yet been determined by Congress and driven in part by increasingly sophisticated and approved by the President, but this future multi- readily available computing environments, lift year investment will empower the mathematical the mathematical sciences to the forefront of sciences on three frontiers: (a) advancing science and engineering, reshaping modern fundamental mathematical sciences, (b) science and engineering discovery through advancing the mathematical sciences in quantitative predictions, modeling, visualization, interdisciplinary science and engineering, and (c) computational algorithms, and optimization advancing the nation’s mathematical skills and methods. Science and engineering are becoming literacy. more mathematical and statistical, not only in the physical, engineering and informational sciences, The total FY 2001 Current Plan funding for but also the biological, geophysical, DMS is $121.48 million. environmental, social, behavioral, and economic sciences. While the mathematical sciences are The Division of Physics pervasive in science, technology and health, mathematics and statistics is often an invisible The Division of Physics (PHY) has major partner, encapsulated, for example, in stewardship responsibility for the university algorithms, models, and software packages. sector of the physics community. The field of Today the mathematical sciences play a physics provides the basis for the fundamental fundamental role in the security of understanding of the physical universe, from the communications; in robust computation and basic building blocks of matter to the evolution and structure of the universe. Physics also contributes conceptual underpinnings and technologies to many other fields. Moreover, physics contributes strongly to the training of the
Recommended publications
  • Prizes, Fellowships and Scholarships

    Prizes, Fellowships and Scholarships

    ESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES ALERT Issue 26: Volume 2 R SCHOLARSHIPS, PRIZES AND FELLOWSHIPS (Quarter: July - September, 2016) A Compilation by the Scholarships & Prizes RESEARCH SERVICES UNIT Early/ Mid Career Fellowships OFFICE OF RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT (ORID), UNIVERSITY OF GHANA Pre/ Post-Doctoral Fellowships Thesis/ Dissertation Funding JUNE 2016 Issue 26: Volume 2: Scholarships, Prizes and Fellowships (July – September, 2016) TABLE OF CONTENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR JULY 2016 DAVID ADLER LECTURESHIP AWARD ............................................................................................................ 15 HAYMAN PRIZE FOR PUBLISHED WORK PERTAINING TO TRAUMATISED CHILDREN AND ADULTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 HANS A BETHE PRIZE ........................................................................................................................................... 16 TOM W BONNER PRIZE IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS ............................................................................................ 17 HERBERT P BROIDA PRIZE .................................................................................................................................. 18 OLIVER E BUCKLEY PRIZE IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS ............................................................... 18 DANNIE HEINEMAN PRIZE FOR MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS..................................................................
  • 2018 APS Prize and Award Recipients

    2018 APS Prize and Award Recipients

    APS Announces 2018 Prize and Award Recipients The APS would like to congratulate the recipients of these APS prizes and awards. They will be presented during APS award ceremonies throughout the year. Both March and April meeting award ceremonies are open to all APS members and their guests. At the March Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Monday, March 5, 5:45 - 6:45 p.m. at the Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) in Los Angeles, CA. At the April Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Sunday, April 15, 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. at the Greater Columbus Convention Center in Columbus, OH. In addition to the award ceremonies, most prize and award recipients will give invited talks during the meeting. Some recipients of prizes, awards are recognized at APS unit meetings. For the schedule of APS meetings, please visit http://www.aps.org/meetings/calendar.cfm. Nominations are open for most 2019 prizes and awards. We encourage members to nominate their highly-qualified peers, and to consider broadening the diversity and depth of the nomination pool from which honorees are selected. For nomination submission instructions, please visit the APS web site (http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/index.cfm). Prizes 2018 APS MEDAL FOR EXCELLENCE IN PHYSICS 2018 PRIZE FOR A FACULTY MEMBER FOR RESEARCH IN AN UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION Eugene N. Parker University of Chicago Warren F. Rogers In recognition of many fundamental contributions to space physics, Indiana Wesleyan University plasma physics, solar physics and astrophysics for over 60 years.
  • 2005 Annual Report American Physical Society

    2005 Annual Report American Physical Society

    1 2005 Annual Report American Physical Society APS 20052 APS OFFICERS 2006 APS OFFICERS PRESIDENT: PRESIDENT: Marvin L. Cohen John J. Hopfield University of California, Berkeley Princeton University PRESIDENT ELECT: PRESIDENT ELECT: John N. Bahcall Leo P. Kadanoff Institue for Advanced Study, Princeton University of Chicago VICE PRESIDENT: VICE PRESIDENT: John J. Hopfield Arthur Bienenstock Princeton University Stanford University PAST PRESIDENT: PAST PRESIDENT: Helen R. Quinn Marvin L. Cohen Stanford University, (SLAC) University of California, Berkeley EXECUTIVE OFFICER: EXECUTIVE OFFICER: Judy R. Franz Judy R. Franz University of Alabama, Huntsville University of Alabama, Huntsville TREASURER: TREASURER: Thomas McIlrath Thomas McIlrath University of Maryland (Emeritus) University of Maryland (Emeritus) EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Martin Blume Martin Blume Brookhaven National Laboratory (Emeritus) Brookhaven National Laboratory (Emeritus) PHOTO CREDITS: Cover (l-r): 1Diffraction patterns of a GaN quantum dot particle—UCLA; Spring-8/Riken, Japan; Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lab, SLAC & UC Davis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 085503 (2005) 2TESLA 9-cell 1.3 GHz SRF cavities from ACCEL Corp. in Germany for ILC. (Courtesy Fermilab Visual Media Service 3G0 detector studying strange quarks in the proton—Jefferson Lab 4Sections of a resistive magnet (Florida-Bitter magnet) from NHMFL at Talahassee LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT APS IN 2005 3 2005 was a very special year for the physics community and the American Physical Society. Declared the World Year of Physics by the United Nations, the year provided a unique opportunity for the international physics community to reach out to the general public while celebrating the centennial of Einstein’s “miraculous year.” The year started with an international Launching Conference in Paris, France that brought together more than 500 students from around the world to interact with leading physicists.
  • 2009 SIAM Annual Meeting Is Being Held Rooms Sell out Quickly!) in Conjunction with the Community Lecture Wednesday, July 8, 6:15 – 7:15 PM I.E

    2009 SIAM Annual Meeting Is Being Held Rooms Sell out Quickly!) in Conjunction with the Community Lecture Wednesday, July 8, 6:15 – 7:15 PM I.E

    Join SIAM in Denverwww.siam.org/meetings/an09 Organizing Committee Mihai Anitescu, Argonne National Laboratory Andrew Conn, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center Lenore Cowen, Tufts University William McEneaney, University of California, San Diego Esmond Ng, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Donald Estep, Colorado State University Lori Freitag-Diachin (co-chair), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Padma Raghavan, Pennsylvania State University Jonathan Rubin, University of Pittsburgh Invited Presentations Björn Sandstede, University of Surrey, United Plenary Speakers Kingdom Heinz-Otto Kreiss, KTH Stockholm, Sweden Rob Schreiber, Hewlett Packard Karl Kunisch*, University of Graz, Austria Tao Tang, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong Ulisses Mello, IBM Research Andy Wathen (co-chair), University of Oxford, * Joint speaker with the 2009 SIAM Conference on United Kingdom Control and Its Applications Thaleia Zariphopoulou, University of Texas, Austin Topical Speakers Alberto Bressan, Pennsylvania State University Prizes and Awards Luncheon Russel E. Caflisch, University of California, Los Angeles The following prizes and awards will be presented Stephen Coombes, University of Nottingham, at the prizes and awards luncheon on Tuesday, United Kingdom July 7, 12:30 – 2:00 PM. Michael C. Ferris, University of Wisconsin Wen-mei Hwu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign I. E. Block Community Lecture Ioannis Karatzas, Columbia University Theodore von Kármán Prize Lecture Charles E. Leiserson, Cilk Arts and Massachusetts AWM-SIAM Sonia Kovalevsky Lecture Institute of Technology W. T. and Idalia Reid Prize in Mathematics Lecture Lois Curfman McInnes, Argonne National Laboratory The John von Neumann Lecture Denver images courtesy Bruce Younggreen, and Denver Visitors and Convention Bureau and Denver Visitors Younggreen, Denver images courtesy Bruce Juan C.
  • 2018 March Meeting Program Guide

    2018 March Meeting Program Guide

    MARCHMEETING2018 LOS ANGELES MARCH 5-9 PROGRAM GUIDE #apsmarch aps.org/meetingapp aps.org/meetings/march Senior Editor: Arup Chakraborty Robert T. Haslam Professor of Chemical Engineering; Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT Now welcoming submissions in the Physics of Living Systems Submit your best work at elifesci.org/physics-living-systems Image: D. Bonazzi (CC BY 2.0) Led by Senior Editor Arup Chakraborty, this dedicated new section of the open-access journal eLife welcomes studies in which experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches rooted in the physical sciences are developed and/or applied to provide deep insights into the collective properties and function of multicomponent biological systems and processes. eLife publishes groundbreaking research in the life and biomedical sciences. All decisions are made by working scientists. WELCOME t is a pleasure to welcome you to Los Angeles and to the APS March I Meeting 2018. As has become a tradition, the March Meeting is a spectacular gathering of an enthusiastic group of scientists from diverse organizations and backgrounds who have broad interests in physics. This meeting provides us an opportunity to present exciting new work as well as to learn from others, and to meet up with colleagues and make new friends. While you are here, I encourage you to take every opportunity to experience the amazing science that envelops us at the meeting, and to enjoy the many additional professional and social gatherings offered. Additionally, this is a year for Strategic Planning for APS, when the membership will consider the evolving mission of APS and where we want to go as a society.
  • Executive Committee Meeting 6:00 Pm, November 22, 2008 Marriott Rivercenter Hotel

    Executive Committee Meeting 6:00 Pm, November 22, 2008 Marriott Rivercenter Hotel

    Executive Committee Meeting 6:00 pm, November 22, 2008 Marriott Rivercenter Hotel Attendees: Steve Pope, Lex Smits, Phil Marcus, Ellen Longmire, Juan Lasheras, Anette Hosoi, Laurette Tuckerman, Jim Brasseur, Paul Steen, Minami Yoda, Martin Maxey, Jean Hertzberg, Monica Malouf, Ken Kiger, Sharath Girimaji, Krishnan Mahesh, Gary Leal, Bill Schultz, Andrea Prosperetti, Julian Domaradzki, Jim Duncan, John Foss, PK Yeung, Ann Karagozian, Lance Collins, Kimberly Hill, Peggy Holland, Jason Bardi (AIP) Note: Attachments related to agenda items follow the order of the agenda and are appended to this document. Key Decisions The ExCom voted to move $100k of operating funds to an endowment for a new award. The ExCom voted that a new name (not Otto Laporte) should be chosen for this award. In the coming year, the Award committee (currently the Fluid Dynamics Prize committee) should establish the award criteria, making sure to distinguish the criteria from those associated with the Batchelor prize. The committee should suggest appropriate wording for the award application and make a recommendation on the naming of the award. The ExCom voted to move Newsletter publication to the first weeks of June and December each year. The ExCom voted to continue the Ad Hoc Committee on Media and Public Relations for two more years (through 2010). The ExCom voted that $15,000 per year in 2009 and 2010 be allocated for Media and Public Relations activities. Most of these funds would be applied toward continuing to use AIP media services in support of news releases and Virtual Pressroom activities related to the annual DFD meeting. Meeting Discussion 1.
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science

    Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science

    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The new prophet : Harold C. Urey, scientist, atheist, and defender of religion Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j80v92j Author Shindell, Matthew Benjamin Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The New Prophet: Harold C. Urey, Scientist, Atheist, and Defender of Religion A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History (Science Studies) by Matthew Benjamin Shindell Committee in charge: Professor Naomi Oreskes, Chair Professor Robert Edelman Professor Martha Lampland Professor Charles Thorpe Professor Robert Westman 2011 Copyright Matthew Benjamin Shindell, 2011 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Matthew Benjamin Shindell is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...... iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………. iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………….
  • April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No

    April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No

    April 2002 NEWS Volume 11, No. 4 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Executive Board Expresses Concern Over Funding Imbalance In Bush Administration’s FY2003 Budget Request When President Bush unveiled outside of the scientific community tire research budget of the National for physical science remains es- his FY 2003 budget request for have expressed concern at the im- Science Foundation, in keeping sentially flat, the APS Executive The Executive Board of the R&D in February, no one was sur- balance of research funding with the president’s campaign bud- Board approved a resolution re- American Physical Society ap- prised at the emphasis on priorities in favor of the biological get to double the NIH budget by garding the FY2003 budget plauds the proposed increased antiterrorist, and on homeland sciences. 2003. request at its meeting on Febru- for the NIH and for life sciences and economic security in the wake For example, the National Insti- Noting that while funding for ary 23, 2002. The full text of the generally in the FY2003 Bud- of the September 11th attacks. How- tutes of Health would receive a $3.9 biological and medical research Executive Board statement is con- get Request submitted by President Bush on February 4, ever, many both within and billion increase, larger than the en- continues to increase, funding tained in the box at the right. 2002. However, the Board ex- presses great concern about Task Force to Weigh Pros the requested budgetary lev- Outlook on FY 2003 Budget Bills els for research in the physi- cal sciences.

  • Mothers of Invention: Women in Technology

    Mothers of Invention: Women in Technology n old adage counsels, “Maternity Rideout (AZT), M. Katherine Holloway and is a matter of fact… paternity is Chen Zhao (protease inhibitors), and Diane a matter of opinion.” And indeed, Pennica (tissue plasminogen activator).2 Awhen it comes to people, the evidence of By 1998, women accounted for 10.3 who physically bears the child is visible and percent of all U.S.–origin patents granted undeniable. With the gestation of ideas, annually. Innovation professionals believe this however, lineage is less clear. percentage will continue to increase. A recent The evidence for women’s role in survey of one thousand U.S. researchers technology has been obscured historically. yielded the names of twenty U.S. scientists Only two percent of the fi ve hundred Nobel under the age of forty who have demonstrated Prize Laureates recognized for scientifi c once-in-a-generation insight. Nine of them— achievement are women. As recently as the almost half—are women.3 Jennifer A. Kurtz early 1980s, U.S. Patent and Trademark Offi ce records show that only 2.8 percent of patents Research Fellow, Indiana went to women each year. This participation Business Research Center, rate did not differ much from the 1 percent or Women must Kelley School of Business, so of patents that went to women in the period increasingly pursue Indiana University from 1790 to 1895.1 Young women have had relatively few role science and models to encourage their pursuit of scientifi c and technological adventures. That pattern has technology to ensure begun to change as women are increasingly that the future needs present in all dimensions of the innovation life cycle: knowledge creation, technology transfer, for a skilled U.S.
  • Faculty Award Winners by Award

    Faculty Award Winners by Award

    Department of Physics and Astronomy Awards by Award Award Faculty Member Year Academia Europaea Kharzeev, Dmitri 2021 Academy of Teacher‐Scholar Award (Stony Brook) Jung, Chang Kee 2003 Academy Prize for Physics, Academy of Sciences, Goettingen, Germany Pietralla, Norbert 2004 AFOSR Young Investigator Award Allison, Thomas 2013 Albert Szent‐Gyorgi Fellowship (Hungary) Mihaly, Laszlo 2005 Alpha Epsilon Delta Premedical Honor Society (honorary member) Mendez, Emilio 1998 American Academy of Arts & Sciences Fellow Brown, Gerald 1976 Dill, Kenneth 2014 Zamolodchikov, Alexander 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow Allen, Philip 2009 Ben‐Zvi, Ilan 2007 Jung, Chang Kee 2017 Dill, Kenneth 1997 Jacak, Barbara 2009 Sprouse, Gene 2012 Grannis, Paul 2000 Jacobsen, Chris 2002 Kharzeev, Dmitri 2010 Kirz, Janos 1985 Korepin, Vladmir 1998 Lee, Linwood 1985 Marburger, Jack 2000 Mihaly, Laszlo 2013 Stephens, Peter 2011 Sterman, George 2011 Swartz, Cliff 1973 American Association of Physics Teachers Distinguished Service Award Swartz, Cliff 1973 American Association of Physics Teachers Millikan Award Strassenburg, Arnold 1972 American Geophysical Union/U.S. Geological Survey ‐ naming of de Zafra Ridge, Antarctica de Zafra, Robert 2002 American Physical Society DAMOP Best Dissertation Weinacht, Thomas 2002 American Physical Society Fellow Abanov, Alexandre 2016 Allen, Philip 1986 Aronson, Meigan 2001 Averin, Dmitri 2004 Ben‐Zvi, Ilan 1994 Brown, Gerald 1976 Deshpande, Abhay 2014 Drees, Axel 2016 Essig, Rouven 2020 Nathan Leoce‐Schappin
  • WOMEN in STEM WORD SEARCH Learn About Women Scientists Who Broke MARY JACKSON Boundaries and Made Important Discoveries Credit: NASA

    WOMEN in STEM WORD SEARCH Learn About Women Scientists Who Broke MARY JACKSON Boundaries and Made Important Discoveries Credit: NASA

    WOMEN IN STEM WORD SEARCH Learn about women scientists who broke MARY JACKSON boundaries and made important discoveries Credit: NASA V WANGARIMAATHAIMEQNW QAWAZSXEDCFRVGHAITIA XMLONOSKCAJYRAMRRPLL ZAPELNMTIOPYBNMYUIKK ORBINJANEGOODALLCRNC NYDBATRKJLXDTOCEEAAO IGOAQSIDFYOWRNBAICRT KONGHJMNOQPEVAMKRHFN GLNZXCAVALNLLUQEAEDI DDABNMEWETRLYXKYMLNL OASPOIJUIIEFERLDSCIC HRTAZWEESKXRAEQTSALC YOREYAMTREPPEOGAIRAM HSIWEEIXRYATYSUJMSSA TSCESOSRAHYNMPHIKOOR OAKIDSOATGPMOERKINRA RVLFAPNRNRTUYOUYOUQB OWAERTEYMDGUOFXBCVOR DENXOBIVANDANASHIVAA MMDYLADDRANYAMEIRAMB Answer key on page 4 Alice Ball Mae Jemison Rachel Carson Barbara McClintock Marie Curie Rosalind Franklin Bertha Parker Marie Maynard Daly Tu Youyou Donna Strickland Maria Goeppert Mayer Valentina Tereshkova Dorothy Hodgkin Mary Golda Ross Vandana Shiva Jane Goodall Mary Jackson Wangari Maathai An agency of the Lise Meitner Mary Leakey Government of Ontario WOMEN IN STEM WORD SEARCH Learn about women scientists who broke MAE JEMISON boundaries and made important discoveries Credit: NASA 1. Marie Curie (1867-1934) Polish-born French physicist and chemist. She was the first woman to be awarded a Nobel Prize (Physics), in 1903, for her research on X-rays and radioactivity, and the first person to be awarded a second Nobel Prize (Chemistry), in 1911, for her discovery of the elements polonium and radium. 2. Lise Meitner (1878-1968) Austrian-born nuclear physicist. Her research led to the discovery of uranium fission, for which only her male colleague, Otto Hahn, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1945. 1n 1997, an element was named meitnerium (Mt) in her honour. 3. Alice Ball (1892-1916) Black American chemist. She developed the first effective treatment for leprosy, later known as the Ball Method, which was widely used for over thirty years until the introduction of sulfone drugs. 4. Maria Goeppert Mayer (1906-1972) German-born American mathematician and physicist.