Prospecting Report on Elliot Lake Area

Home , Elliot Lake

I I I I I I J I Reliant Gold Corp. I Report I on the I Exploration of the Esten Property Elliot Lake Area I District of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario I NTS 041J/07 I Trevor Boyd, P.Geo. February, 2012 I I I I I I I I I I I

I SUMMARY

The Esten Property, located in the Elliot Lake area of north-central Ontario, was initially explored by trenching I and drilling in 1956, and drilling in 197 4, encountering two linear zones of siliceous rocks within Archean granitoid intrusive rocks. The southern zone hosts chalcopyrite and pyrite mineralization. Gitennes Exploration Inc. I acquired the Esten for its potential to host copper-gold mineralization, and completed Inverse Polarization (IP), Airborne Magnetic, and Mobile Metal lon (MMI) soil geochemistry surveys identifying a number of targets for drill testing. I The property consists of 11 contiguous unpatented mining claims totalling 42 units, located 20 road-kilometres south of Elliot Lake, Ontario. The claims were subject to an option agreement between Reliant Gold Inc. and Mr. I Robert John de Carle and Harry Hodge. Access is by a dirt road originating at Highway 108, between Highway 17 and the town of Elliot Lake. I In 2010, Reliant Gold carried out exploration comprising of surface sampling of historic trenches plus a property-wide geological traverses focusing on the ground follow-up of the Gitenne Exploration anomalies plus general prospecting. The results confirmed the presence of good Cu mineralization in the trenches. I Based upon the field investigation and review of previous work, additional drilling is recommended for the property to test the extent of the known mineralization zone at depth towards the east where the Gitennes high IP I chargeability is strongest and another equally strong IP chargeability anomaly located 200 metres to the south I I I I I I TABLE of CONTENTS Page SUMMARY...... i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATIOI\1 ...... - 1 - ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ...... - 2- HISTORY ...... - 2- EXPLORATION ...... - 4- REGIONAL GEOLOGY...... - 4 - LOCAL GEOLOGY ...... - 5 - PROPERTY GEOLOGY ...... - 5 - ROCK SAMPLING METHODS AND APPROACH ...... - 7 - INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS ...... - 8- RECOMMENDATIONS ...... - 8- REFERENCES ...... - 9 - CERTIFICATE of QUALIFIED PERSON ...... - 10-

LIST of TABLES

Table 1. Esten Property- Land Status September 2011 ...... - 1 - Table 2. Drill Intercepts for Federal Kirkland (1956), and Esten Explorations (1974) Drill Holes. . - 3- Table 3: Esten Property Geological Units ...... - 6 -

LIST of FIGURES

Figure 1: Esten Property Location Sketch Following Page 10 Figure 2: Esten Property Claim Map Following Page 10 Figure 3: Esten Property Samples Location Map Following Page 10

LIST of APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1...... List of Rock Samples APPENDIX II...... Analytical Certificates APPENDIX Ill ...... Prospecting and Sampling Log

ii I

I INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE Reliant Gold Corp. acquired the Esten Property in 2010. The property consists of 11 contiguous unpatented mining claims totalling 42 units, located 20 road-kilometres south of Elliot Lake, Ontario (Figure 1). It is in the I Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division, Ontario. Previous exploration in the 1950's and mid-1970's tested a zone of chalcopyrite and pyrite mineralization in a zone of highly siliceous rocks, variously interpreted to be Archean I metavolcanics or metasedimentary rocks. Sources of information include Ontario Base Maps of 1:20,000 topography, geological maps and reports from the Ontario Department of Mines/Ontario Geological Survey, assessment work reports at the Provincial Mining Recorder's Office in Sudbury, and the list of references I provided in the References section of this report.

I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The Esten Property is located in the Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division, Ontario (NTS 041 J07), about 20 road- kilometres south of Elliot Lake. It lies in a rectangle bounded by UTM coordinates 377000E 5131 OOON, 377000E I 5127000N, 372000E 5127000N, and 372000E 5131000N (all UTM coordinates and map projections in this report are for Zone 17, NAD83 datum). It comprises of 11 unpatented and unsurveyed mining claims totalling 42 units I (see Table 1 and Figure 2). The claims are located in Esten Township (Mining Plan G-3270). Reliant Gold entered into an option agreement with Mr. Robert John de Carle and Harry Hodge during May, 2010, whereby I Reliant Gold can earn a 100% interest in the claims comprising the Esten Property. The original property comprised of 10 claims totalling 26 units; a claim totalling 16 units were added during December, 2010. All I staking documents are registered with the Provincial Mining Recorder, Sudbury, Ontario. I I I I I

I Information regarding claims can be viewed at the Provincial Mining Recorder's Office in Sudbury, or on the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines website at http://www.mndm.qov.on.ca/mndm/mines. I I I - 1 - I

ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY I Access to the Esten Property is by vehicle. Elliot Lake, population 12,000, is approximately 35 kilometres north of Highway 17, between Sudbury and Sault Ste. Marie. It is the nearest population and service centre, I although mining equipment and labour force would be more readily available in Sudbury. From the Highway 108 exit at Serpent River on Highway 17, it is 11 kilometres to an unnamed dirt road on the west side of Highway 108, then 5.0 kilometres to an area of old trenches on the north side of the road, which lie in the main area of previous I drilling. An Ontario Hydro transmission line to Elliot Lake lies less than a kilometre west of the western boundary of the I Esten Property. Topography is dominated by low rolling hills comprising exposed or shallowly buried bedrock mantled by till and glaciofluvial deposits. Drainage is to the south, ultimately to Lake Huron. Elevations on the property vary I from 260 to 300 metres a.s.l. Vegetation consists of immature stands of maple, white spruce, white pine, birch I and poplar. HISTORY The history and geology sections of this report are largely drawn from the 2005 assessment report filed by I James Foster on behalf of Gitennes Exploration Inc. (Foster 2005). The property was trenched and drilled in 1956 by Federal Kirkland Mining Co. (28 holes- 9,594 feet) and by Esten Explorations Inc. in 1974 (6 holes- I 1,922 feet). In total, 28 holes were directed at the known zone of mineralization or its potential strike extensions. Reports in the Sudbury assessment files include microfiche copies of all drill logs by the two companies, a VLF I EM map, magnetometer survey map, and report by Esten Exploration Ltd. Copper assays only are given in the logs for most of the holes- two important Federal Kirkland holes (15 and 17) along strike have no assays, but do indicate chalcopyrite mineralization is present. No trace of the 1956 drill sites have been found, and it is likely the I area was logged sometime following the Federal Kirkland work. However, there is still BQ-sized casing in bedrock and some metallic debris for Esten Explorations' holes 74-1, -7, -8, and -9. Their location in the field I corresponds reasonably well with those shown on Esten Exploration maps, however the azimuths for casing still remaining in the ground are quite different than azimuths stated in the logs. Table 2 gives average copper intercepts for those drill holes for which assay values are given in the logs (all I footages converted to metres). No assays were reported for hole 74-9. Based upon diamond drilling completed on the Property in 1956 and 1974, a non-NI 43-101 compliant historic resource of 76,900 tons at 1.73% Cu is I reported. I I I I I - 2- I

I Table 2. Drill Intercepts for Federal Kirkland ( 1956) and Esten Explor ations (1974) Drill Holes FROM TO INTERVAL Cu HOLE metres metres metres % I 1 44.5 55.87 11.37 0.80 2 21.03 22.01 0.98 0.45 49.19 54.83 5.64 1.72 I 3 10.06 10.67 0.61 0.84 4 35.96 36.85 0.88 1.13 80 31 8945 9.12 0 25 I 5 35.72 36.21 0.49 2.15 54.68 55.87 1.19 3.69 I 67.72 85.95 18.23 0.80 6 57.30 63.21 5.91 0.72 97.07 105.00 7.93 0.49 I 7 123.62 124.44 0.82 1.07 8 50.78 51.57 0.79 1.32 55.44 56.69 1.25 1.03 I 9 70.10 76.20 6.10 0.84 10 92.01 94.09 2.08 0.47 11 105.58 110.64 5.06 1.72 I 116.73 119.17 2.44 0.53 20 42.67 52.42 9.75 0.79 21 20.73 25.36 4.64 1.06 I 29.93 37.09 7.16 0.78 43.77 51.51 7.74 0.67 I 74-1 83.21 86.25 3.05 0.26 74-7 36.27 38.25 1.98 1.30 54.16 54.77 0.61 0.93 I 74-8 18.20 19.35 1.16 2.74 27.25 29.05 1 80 1 06 31.61 33.40 1.80 1.12 I 37.70 38.16 0.46 0.83 38.89 44.13 5.23 0.83 I 45.14 47.46 2.32 1.20 The area was flown with airborne magnetics by the Geological Survey of Canada - Ontario Department of I Mines in 1963 (1/4-mile line-spacing for the Elliot Lake area). There is a strong WNW-trending four-kilometre long magnetic anomaly on this map - the area of historic trenching and drilling on the Esten Property occurs near its eastern end on its northern margin. I Between 2003 and 2005, Gitennes Exploration Inc. carried out exploration comprising of sampling of the existing trenches was done, as well as a brief programme of mapping. Of the 21 chip samples collected, twelve I samples returned copper values in the range of 0.24% - 1.62%. This followed by a property-wide airborne magnetic and electromagnetic (HLEM) survey, and over the area of previous drilling and trenching, linecutting, I geological mapping, geochemical (MMI-A and MMI-B) sampling, and IP surveying. Airborne magnetics confirmed the length and relative intensity of a linear magnetic anomaly believed to be associated with the copper I - 3- I

mineralization. No significant EM conductors were detected, however, some interesting high chargeability I anomalies were identified associated with the mineralized zone. Bedrock along the trace of the magnetic feature comprises massive to gneissic felsic intrusions with at least two generations of diabase dykes, one of which is I strongly magnetic. In the vicinity of historic trenching , mapping extended the known extent of the two siliceous zones, and confirmed that IP chargeability anomalies were associated with both. I EXPLORATION I During August 2010, positioning during mapping was determined with hand-held GPS units, which usually display an accuracy of 5 to 25 metres, depending on satellite reception . The baseline of the Gitannes Exploration was found and confirmed to be oriented at 120° with picket LO+OO , O+OOE located at UTM Nad83 Zone 17 , 375136E, I 5128580N.

I For the program, Reliant Gold began completed a surface examination of the property with a program of sampling of existing trenches, and follow-up prospecting of the property previously mapped by Gitannes Exploration. Analytical results from rock sampling at Esten confirmed the presence of high grade copper (Cu) I concentrations on surface outcrop. Assays from the surface sampling of the historical trenches on the Property returned an average value of 1.52% Cu from a 0.5 metre chip sample obtained from each of the five historical I trenches. The highest grade assay obtained was 2.4% Cu The results of the sampling are summarized in Appendix 1. I Exploration in 2010 comprised as well of ground checking and sampling of geology and mineralization in areas of the Gitannes Exploration IP survey high chargeability anomalies identified in 2004. Based upon the field I investigation and review of previous work, it appears that main mineralized zone associated with the sampled trenches hosts one of the two strongest high chargeability anomalies and this zone remains open. Based upon I the re-examination of the IP survey results in conjunction with the fieldwork, the zone appears to have an easterly plunge.at a moderate to steep angle (40-60 degrees) and the IP anomaly overlies an area of the most promising I drill holes testing the south siliceous zone at its eastern end where it appears to be open at depth. Another equally strong chargeability anomaly is located 200 metres to the south of the main zone. Rusty chloritized amphibolite sub-crop or possible outcrop hosting disseminated sulphides was found in the area. This particular I anomaly has never been drilled. I REGIONAL GEOLOGY The Esten Property lies within the Abitibi Subprovince of the Archean Superior Province of the Canadian I Shield , where the Abitibi is in contact with Paleoproterozoic rocks of the Huronian Supergroup of the Southern Subprovince. In the Esten area, Archean rocks include metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the Whiskey I Lake Greenstone Belt, and foliated to gneissic granitoid intrusive rocks. Proterozoic rocks in the report area are related to the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogeny, and include the uraniferous conglomerates and continental clastic and marine chemical metasedimentary rocks of the Huronian I Supergroup. Regional Paleoproterozoic dyke swarms include the Matachewan dyke swarm (2446 to 2473Ma), I - 4 - I the Nipissing diabase (2219 Ma), the Preissac dike swarm (2150 Ma), and the Sudbury dyke swarm ( 1238 Ma; I Osmani, 1991 ). Although not outcropping in the immediate area, the Sudbury Structure, host of many significant nickel-copper-PGE deposits, lies 80 kilometres to the east Recent deposits are peat bogs, and fluvial sands and I gravels of no great extent LOCAL GEOLOGY I Detailed government mapping of Esten Township was done at one inch to 1/2 mile by Robertson (1970). To the east, the Whiskey Lake greenstone belt was mapped at 1:15,000 by Jensen (1994). The Whiskey Lake greenstones are Archean tholeiitic and calc-alkalic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, with minor amounts I of komatiitic metavolcanics. Esten Township itself is predominantly underlain by metamorphosed granitoid intrusions that form the core of the Chiblow Anticline. To the north lie Huronian clastic sedimentary rocks, which I form the southern limb of the east-plunging Quirke Lake Syncline. From oldest to youngest, the Huronian sequence comprises the Elliot Lake Group (metavolcanics and clastic sedimentary rocks with Witwatersrand-type I uraniferous conglomerates), and the Hough Lake, Quirke Lake, and Cobalt Groups (Bennet et a/, 1991 ), each comprising three sedimentary cycles of conglomerate overlain by mudstone, siltstone, or carbonate rocks overlain by crossbedded sandstones. These were folded during the Penokean Orogeny into the east-trending I paired Chiblow Anticline-Quirke Lake Syncline. To the south , along Highway 17, the Murray Fault System has juxtaposed amphibolite-facies metamorphosed equivalents of the foregoing against greenschist- to amphibolite I facies Huronian lithologies. Major Proterozoic intrusions in the report area include Nipissing diabase dykes and gabbroic to granitic rocks of the Croker Island Complex Of lesser extent, but possibly of significance to the I Esten Property, are pre-Nipissing and post-Nipissing diabase dykes, the younger of which is magnetite-rich (Jensen, 1994).

I PROPERTY GEOLOGY In general, the property covers one or more massive to gneissic Archean felsic intrusive bodies, which may be phases of a single batholith, with occasional inclusions of Archean supracrustal rocks, cut by at least two I generations of diabase dykes. The following geological description is predominately from the work completed by Gittennes Exploration and is I repeated here from their assessment report completed in 2005. Only two large exposures of probable Archean supracrustal metavolcanic rocks (mapping unit 1a) were mapped on the Esten Property. The larger lies at the I west end of an unnamed lake on Claim 1191953, well north of the airborne magnetic anomaly. It is a well foliated amphibolite lacking conclusive extrusive textures, but extensive shearing when examined during this program in 2010. The second , much smaller exposure, exposed on the east side of a logging road on Claim 3016177, may I be a large inclusion. It is a well foliated, banded mafic metavolcanic rock or metavolcaniclastic rock with a north trending zone of brecciation, possibly a fault Otherwise, remnants of mafic metavolcanic (or intrusive) rocks are I found as inclusions in weakly fol iated intermediate to felsic granitoid rocks. These are generally metre- to several metres-sized irregular inclusions with relatively sharp (but locally assimilated) inclusion boundaries, recrystallized I to medium-grained, weakly to moderately foliated rocks lacking internal textures. Their distribution appears to be irregular, which does not appear to define a zone or trend where inclusion density could be indicating a previously unrecognized supracrustal belt Both rock types exhibiting intrusive contacts in single outcrops were observed in I this area during this program. I - 5- I

I Table 3: Esten Property Geological Units PHANEROZOIC CENOZOIC I QUATERNARY PLEISTOCENE Glacial and glaciofluvial deposits; till, sand, gravel I Unconformity PRECAMBRIAN PROTEROZOIC I Post Nipissing mafic dykes magnetic diabase dykes Intrusive Contact (not observed) I Nipissing Diabase dykes weakly magnetic, very weakly metamorphosed diabase dykes Intrusive Contact ARCHEAN Intermediate to Felsic lntrusive(s) Weakly foliated to gneissic intermediate to felsic (granitoid) I intrusives, <5% ferromagnesian minerals and mafic (volcanic) inclusions Strongly silicified and foliated intermediate to felsic intrusive I Intrusive Contact (not observed)

Intermediate to Felsic lntrusive(s) Weakly foliated to gneissic intermediate to felsic (granitoid) intrusives, 5-20% ferromagnesian minerals and mafic I (volcanic) inclusions I Intrusive Contact (not observed) Mafic intrusives Foliated gabbroic to pyroxenitic intrusions I Intermediate to felsic granitoid intrusion(s) form the bulk of the bedrock on the Esten Property. These are massive or weakly foliated to gneissic, with mafic mineral content ranging from <1% to 20%. The intensity of I foliation is related to mafic content - those rocks with little or no mafics appear massive. Although an attempt was made to differentiate mafic inclusion-rich (mapping unit 2b) from mafic inclusion-poor (mapping unit 2a), the I writer believes the subdivision was not mapping out intrusive phases, nor was it mapping out a zone where inclusion-rich granitoids dominated over inclusion-poor. Cutting both types of granitoid intrusions are narrow I aplite dykes. These are fine-to medium-grained, lack significant mafic mineral content, and generally weather proud. They are ubiquitous, likely multigenerational, and are occasionally seen in concentrations that comprise greater than 50% of the host granitoid rock. I Within the granitoid intrusion(s) in the area of historic drilling are two subparallel zones of intense silicification (mapping unit 1 b). These are fine-grained highly siliceous rocks with little or no mafic minerals, usually hosting I stockworks of narrow quartz veins and veinlets oriented parallel to the overall trend of the zone, with gradational contacts with the host granitoid intrusion(s). The Southern Siliceous Zone is about five metres wide, has been traced over a strike length of 500 metres from L5+00W to LO+OO. At its eastern end, Federal Kirkland trenched it I with at least six trenches or pits in the 1950's. Confined to the Southern Siliceous Zone and cutting it at very low angles are chloritic shears and quartz stringers. Irregular blebs of chalcopyrite and disseminated pyrite are I associated with the shears and in the siliceous host, but do not appear to extend into the granitoid intrusives. The I - 6- I Northern Siliceous Zone is similar in all respects to the southern zone, except that it has little in the way of chlorite I content, and lacks any significant sulphide mineralization. Both siliceous zones were examined and sampled in this program. It has been observed in outcrop from grid Line 7+00W to Line 0+00. Uncorrected ground magnetic I surveying on individual grid lines over both zones did not detect significant magnetic responses, indicating these zones are not in themselves causing the airborne magnetic anomaly. A couple of outcrops of pyroxenite and gabbro (mapping unit 3a) occur at the boundary between Claims I 3016177 and 1191953. These are moderately foliated , and are though to be Archean rather than Proterozoic. They may be inclusions in the surrounding felsic rocks. Their presence was confirmed by this program. I During this program, subcrop and outcrop of rusty sheared diorite and amphibolite sometimes hosting fine disseminated sulphides were observed in local depressions approximately 200 metres south of the South Siliceous Zone in the vicinity of a high chargeability anomaly indentified in the Gittennes IP survey similar in I strength to that which hosts the South Siliceous Zone. No Huronian sedimentary rocks were encountered during mapping. I Proterozoic diabase dykes are well represented on the Esten Property. There are at least two types. The dominant type (mapping unit 4a) is a medium-grained dark green weakly-magnetic massive to very weakly I foliated rock. It appears to be forming west-northwest-trending dykes, probably of hundreds of metres strike length and several to tens of metres width, occasionally with a marked topographic expression ind icating continuity between exposures. This diabase is exposed outside of the trend of the airborne magnetic anomaly, I indicating that at least some of this rock type lacks a well-defined anomalous magnetic signature. The second type of diabase (mapping unit 4b) is a black, fresh-looking fine-grained highly magnetic rock lacking a significant I topographic expression. Uncorrected ground magnetic surveying confirmed that peak magnetic responses are directly associated with outcrops, which occur within the trend of the airborne magnetic feature. The magnetic I diabase was observed cropping out in two areas and were observed in this program: 1) in the southeast corner of Claim 3016177, where it may form a single dyke, probably in excess of four metres thickness, and coincident with the trend of the airborne magnetic anomaly; and I 2) south of the Southern Siliceous Zone, where it appears to form at least two narrow dykes, again coincident with the trend of the airborne magnetic anomaly. I Both contacts were not observed on individual magnetic diabase outcrops in the field , such that the thickness of individual dykes is not known, but likely less than eight metres. The coincident spatial relationship at the Esten I Property suggests the magnetic diabase (or a zone of multiple magnetic dykes) is the dominant cause of the seven-kilometre-long airborne magnetic anomaly.

I ROCK SAMPLING METHODS AND APPROACH During the 2010 program, half metre chip samples were collected in existing trenches on the Southern Siliceous Zone plus grab samples were taken of outcrop and dug-out angular subcrop throughout the property. Grab I samples in particular were chosen in areas believed to be strike extensions of the northern and southern silicified zones. Other samples were obtained from exposures or subcrop in areas in the vicinity of anomalously high IP I chargebility or magnetic signatures indentified from the 2003 Gitannes ground survey.

I The surface samples were sealed in secure packages and delivered by the Qualified Person of the Company to S G S Laboratories in Toronto, Ontario, for FAI323 assay for gold (fire assay with atomic absorption finish) and I - 7 - I multi-acid digestion plus 49 element analysis by ICP-AESIICP-MS (ICM40C) and ore grade analysis for those I samples with >10,000 ppm Cu. A polymetallic standard and blank, unknown to the laboratory, were included with the shipment of samples. S.G.S. Laboratories fulfilled standard QNQC protocols. I INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS I The linear magnetic feature seen in the 2004 airborne magnetic survey completed by Gittannes appears to be closely associated with highly magnetic WNW-trending fine-grained diabase dyke(s). Although these dykes appear to be narrow, they are highly magnetic. I Berube (2004) recommended drilling on five IP targets in their work report. "First-priority" targets are associated with the Southern Siliceous Zone. Based upon the results of the 2010 field program; these IP targets I indicate potential of hosting possible economic grades and widths of copper mineralization associated with anomalous gold values, however, the targeting should take into account an interpreted ESE trending steep I plunge of the mineralized body based upon examination of the historical drilling results and the mineralization observed in the trenches. A proposed 300m hole at 0+75E-1+00N orientated at Grid South (210 degAZ/45 deg. dip) would essentially I test directly beneath Federal Kirkland (1956) drill hole 11 which intersected multiple Cu-rich zones of up to 1.72% Cu over 5.06m. A second hole is recommended at 1+50E-1+00N to be drilled at a similar orientation and length. I If either of these holes intersect Cu of similar grades and widths at depth then the property remains viable for hosting a potentially economic mineralized body. A third 150 to 200 m hole is proposed (similar to Berube, 2004) I at 0+50E-2+25S drilling Grid North (030 deg.AZ/45 deg. dip) to test the strong south IP trend (E-10). Surface sampling to-date confirmed the presence of the copper; however, to-date the association of significant gold with the base metals is erratic and inconclusive. It is recommended that drill core be analyzed for I Au as well as Cu. I RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the field investigation and review of previous work, a new drilling program is recommended for the I property to test the known mineralization zone at depth towards the east where the Gitennes high chargeability is strongest and another equally strong chargeability anomaly located 200 metres to the south. I I Signed and sealed this 18th day of February, 2012 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada: I I Trevor Boyd, P.Geo. I I - 8- I I REFERENCES Bennett, G. Dressier, B. 0. and Robertson, J. A., 1991: The Huronian Supergroup and associate intrusive rocks; I in Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey Special Volume 4, Part 1, pp. 549-591. Berube, Pierre, 2004: Resistivity/Induced Polarization Survey, Esten Mining Property, Esten Township, Sault Ste. Marie Mining Division, Ontario- Logistics and Interpretation Report; report prepared by Abitibi Geophysique Inc. I for Gitennes Exploration Inc., Foster, James, 2005: REPORT on the EXPLORATION of the ESTEN PROPERTY, ELLIOT LAKE AREA, District of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Unpublished Assessment report prepared by GITENNES EXPLORATION I INC., 10p.

Jensen, L. S., 1994: Geology of the Whiskey Lake Greenstone Belt (West Half), Districts of Sault Ste. I Marie and Sudbury; Ontario Geological Survey Open File Rept. 5883, 101 p. Pritchard, R., 2004: DIGHEMv-osP Survey for Gitennes Exploration Inc. Esten Cu Property, Elliot Lake Area, I Northern Ontario NTS:41 J/7; report prepared by Fugro Airborne Surveys Corp. for Gitennes Exploration Inc. Osmani, L. A., 1991: Proterozoic mafic dike swarms in the Superior Province of Ontario; in Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey Special Volume 4, Part 1, pp. 661-681.

I Robertson, J A., 1970: Geology of the Spragge Area; Ontario Dept. Mines GR 76, 109 p.

Waddington, D. H., 2003: Operations summary- Esten Township property visit; report prepared for Gitennes I Exploration Inc. I I I I I I I I I I - 9- CERTIFICATE of QUALIFIED PERSON

I, Trevor Boyd, P. Geo., do hereby certify that:

1. I am a geologist residing at 148 Lascelles Blvd, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5P 2E6;

2. I obtained a M.Sc (Applied) Minex degree from McGill University in 1988.

3. I have practised my profession 26 years since 1986;

4. I am responsible for the preparation of this Technical Report titled "Report on the Exploration of the Esten Property, Elliot Lake Area, District of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario - NTS 041 JOT' and dated December, 2011. I have visited and worked on the property for a total of 10 days in 2010.

5. I have not had involvement with the property prior to 2010 that is the subject of this Assessment Report;

6. As of the date of this certificate, I am not aware of any material fact or material change with regard to the Esten Property that would make this Technical Report misleading;

7. I am Vice President and an Director of Reliant Gold Inc. I own capital stock of Reliant Gold Inc. and have been granted options to acquire shares in Reliant Gold Inc.;

1 Dated the 18 h day of February, 2012, in Toronto, Ontario.

(Signed and Sealed by) -~-,L;;:;;-----<::::....~...~::.~+-u~~--+---+/1------ Trevor Boyd, P. Geo. #1 023

- 10------

I~ 1 145% 1.. rm

) i ~· Homep.ryne -~~ ~ - I • ,j ... t •, ~ C•""•••• l ' WhlleL J,, lroquots LQk~ Abt ; / .I f .tlls ... I • ../ •• -. 'I '·-- ...... \ b T1r'nl'nlnS - . . 1 • I T I i,l ( 0 .••• ~ •· l l f I v·J I \ If I I j \ _Sup·. ri ut · ~ .... . R m&IJY U e >.... \

•• ~ ...... - __ '\. I ~..__Esr_E_N_PR_O_P_E_R_TY----;J f ''-· I ,· -

"'· \ l H u 0 ·r1 .. ' · -rJc1 AIMaps J Ministry----- of Northern Development and Mines - Windows Internet Explorer - []@~ ~------... v/ ~ ~ +t [ X ~ 1-'J ·;.:c·')k· ---- File Edit View Favorites Tools Help

0 ._) 0 >4 Sign in Private E-mail psge ·------

~ Mineral Titles Online stockwatch @_, Su

_I £:> CLA!Maps I Min~try of Northern Development and Mnes [ • Pail" • Safety • Tools •

Explore Government >

:(; £;.> Ontario c E!J ~ ~,,. 4t r2 ~ Q. .. ~ 0 ~ ;'; 9

©~ 2012~ Queen's Printer for Ontario !Claim 4224430 Unk t o MG System ~ Pan

Done 8 Internet 4a • Oil. too% • __ _ ------

;RELIANT GOLD CORP. ESTEN PROPERTY ONTARIO (See Appendix for GPS Locations and Samples Names) Ill • I • • I I • ...... JOOBIJi • Ill.'.

119195 3 1 X I ------i 1 l ______.l_ \ ESTEN TOWNSHIP

N 6 .a 2010 FIELD PROGRAM •- Samples for Geochecmial Analysis sr- Other Samples (not analysed) Scale b© 2012 Queen's Printer for Ontuio I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I I List of Rock Samples I I I I I I I I ------

Sample# Field Name GPS UTM NAD 83 Coordinates Elevation Comments Au ppb Cu ppm Cu%

255001 E-TR-1A 17 T 375136 5128580 288m Trench 1A, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, 0.5m chip 16 61.7 255002 E-TR-1 B 17 T 375136 5128580 288m Trench 1 B, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, 0.5m chip 22 1750 255003 E-TR-2 17 T 375120 5128592 288m Trench 2, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, cpy, 0.5 m chip 55 >1 0000 1.32 255004 E-TR-3 17 T 375098 5128602 288m Trench 3, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, cpy, 0.5 m chip 43 >10000 2.00 255005 E-TR-4 17 T 375084 5128612 289m Trench 4, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, cpy, 0.5 m chip 74 >10000 1.70 255006 E-TR-5 17 T 375070 5128616 291m Trench 5, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py, cpy, 0.5 m chip 49 >10000 2.40 255007 E-NS-1 17T3751015128634 284m North Siliceous Unit, rusty shear, py, qtz veins, grab 9 129 255008 E-NS-2 17 T 375103 5128635 295m North Siliceous Unit, rusty shear, py, qtz veins, grab 13 90.3 255009 E-NS-3 17 T 375262 5128539 300m North Siliceous Unit, rusty shear, grab, eastern ext. by road 19 31.6 255010 E-NS-4 17 T 375055 5128663 294m North Siliceous Unit, rusty shear, py, grab, western ext. 34 56.5 255011 E-NS-5 17 T 374870 5128796 293m North Siliceous Unit, diss. py, grab, western ext. <5 15.7 255012 E-NS-6 17 T 374816 5128823 290m North Siliceous Unit, diss. py, grab, western ext. <5 236 255013 E-NS-7 17 T 374777 5128838 291m Rusty schist with qtx veining, py <5 9.7 E-NS-8 17 T 374475 5129078 292m Granite outcrop 255014 E-SS-1 17 T 374620 5128688 290m Fine-grained diabase dyke with diss po, magnetic <5 131 255015 E-SS-2 17 T 374663 5128785 296m Chloritic shear in granite <5 5 E-NW-1 17T3744105129118 295m Granite outcrop E-NW-2 17 T 374293 5129184 300m Chloritic amphibolite in contact with granite E-NW-3 17 T 374080 5129256 287m Granite outcrop 255016 E-NW-4 17 T 373935 5129203 290m Chloritic rusty sheared amphibolite, diss. po <5 139 E-NW-5 17 T 373941 5129148 298m Chloritic amphibole and granite E-NW-6 17 T 373888 5129050 291m Gabbro - pyroxenite 255017 E-NW-7 17 T 373612 5129000 288m Pyroxenite in contact with granite, magnetic <5 146 E-NW-8 17 T 373549 5128914 287m Diabase dyke 255018 E-NW-9 17 T 374412 5129066 289m Rusty sheared granodiorite <5 4.9 255019 E-NW-1 0 17 T 374438 5129059 291m Rusty sheared granodiorite <5 23.2 E-NW-11 17 T 373229 5130097 288m Granite E-NW-12 17 T 373127 5130006 281m Granite E-NW-13 17 T 373065 5129821 274m Diabase dyke, magnetic E-NW-14 17 T 372946 5129767 286m Granite, diabase dyke E-NW-15 17 T 372855 5129893 306m Diabase dyke, magnetic E-NW-16 17 T 372857 5130106 300m Granite E-SA-1 17 T 375099 5128453 289m Granite - diabase dyke E-SA-2 17 T 374998 5128241 284m Granite 255020 E-SA-3 17 T 375081 5128386 306m Granite and diabase dyke, fine diss. sulphides, magnetic <5 6.2 255021 E-SA-4 17T3750915128390 298m Granite and diabase dyke, fine diss. sulphides, magnetic <5 159 255022 E-SA-5 17 T 375097 5128469 288m Diorite <5 3.3 255023 E-SA-6 17 T 374709 5128525 308m Diorite <5 38 255024 E-SA-7 17 T 374634 5128336 304m Rusty diorite <5 24.5 ------

255025 E-SA-8 17 T 374614 5128310 303m Rusty chloritic shear in granite <5 6.3 255026 E-SA-9 17 T 375105 5128421 300m Rusty amphibolite, magnetic <5 110 255027 E-SA-1 0 17 T 375106 5128414 298m Rusty amphibolite, magnetic <5 75 .5 255028 E-SA-11 17 T 375094 5128402 300m Rusty amphibolite, magnetic, fine diss. sulphides <5 147 255029 E-SA-12 17 T 375086 5128279 307m Rusty amphibolite <5 140 255030 E-SA-13 17 T 375045 5128206 292m Rusty amphibolite, sheared and fractured <5 132 255031 standard 13 952 255032 E-TR-3B 17 T 375098 5128602 288m Trench 3, South Siliceous Unit, rusty, py , cpy, grab 41 >1 0000 1.82 255033 blank <5 110 17 T 375136 5128580 288m Esten picket 0+00, Base Line from 2003 IP survey 17 T 375070 5128616 291m Esten picket 0+75W, on Base Line I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX II I Analytical Certificates I I I I I I I I I I

Certificate of Analysis Work Order: T0111 068

To: Trevor Boyd Date: Sep 03, 2010 I REC Minerals Corp. 330 Bay Street Suite 820 I TORONTO ON M5H 2S8 I P.O. No. ESTEN PROJECT Project No. I No. Of Samples 33 Date Submitted Jul22,2010 Report Comprises Pages 1 to 7 I (Inclusive of Cover Sheet) Distribution of unused material: I Return to client: I I I Certified By j_/~~ Gav1n McGtll I Operations Manager

SGS Minerals Setvices (Toronto) is accredited by Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and conforms to the requirements of 1501/EC 17025 for I specific tests as indicated on the scope of accreditation to be found at http:llwww.scc.ca/enlprogramsllablmineral.shtml

I Report Footer: LNR =Listed not received I.S. = Insufficient Sample n.a. = Not applicable =No result

*INF = Composition of this sample makes detection impossible by this method I M after a result denotes ppb to ppm conversion, %denotes ppm to% conversion Methods marked with an asterisk (e.g. *NAAOBV) were subcontracted Methods marked with the @symbol (e.g. @AAS21 E) denote accredited tests I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms and conditions. him. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client's direction. The Findings constitute no wanranty of the sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca sgs com

I Memb.r of the SGS Group (Socl•t• o•nerate de Surv.lllanee) I

Page 2 of 7

Element WKg Au AI Ba Ca Cr Cu Fe K Li Method WGH79 FAI323 @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B I Det.Lim. 0.001 5 0.01 1 0.01 1 0.5 0.01 0.01 1 Units kg ppb % ppm % ppm ppm % % ppm 255001 0.772 16 4.52 19 0.28 96 61.7 5.87 0.11 9 255002 1 084 22 4.47 11 0.11 103 1750 5.66 0.10 14 I 255003 1.722 55 3.22 17 0. 06 164 > 10000 6.45 0.13 6 255004 1.846 43 1.10 8 <0.01 144 >10000 5.16 0.07 2 255005 0.932 74 0.40 8 <0.01 81 >10000 4.65 0.06 <1 I 255006 0.908 49 0.26 4 <0.01 65 >10000 4.96 0.03 <1 255007 0.570 9 3.61 98 0.15 144 129 7.33 0.37 12 255008 1.158 13 3.83 53 0.25 109 90.3 5.61 0.29 11 255009 0.618 19 3.05 40 0.06 107 31.6 2.80 0.21 5 I 255010 0.432 34 1.66 129 0.03 116 56.5 2.31 0.61 8 255011 0.518 <5 1.26 146 <0.01 34 15.7 0.30 0.60 2 255012 1 036 <5 3.17 76 0.39 100 236 4.93 0.42 8 255013 1.442 <5 1.71 13 0.03 103 9.7 2.46 0.09 8 I 255014 0.800 <5 6.31 78 5.30 60 131 11.1 0.23 6 255015 0.556 <5 6.83 68 0.86 57 5.0 8.46 0.35 23 255016 0.504 <5 6.77 75 0.62 113 139 10.7 0.36 26 I 255017 0.632 <5 6.80 212 4.34 101 146 10.4 1.11 13 255018 0.838 <5 8.60 35 0.27 99 4.9 5.66 0.14 11 255019 0.638 <5 9.02 27 0.07 44 23.2 2.52 0.18 4 255020 0.664 <5 8.35 922 1.91 86 6.2 4 08 2 08 25 I 255021 1.664 <5 6.67 183 5.54 58 159 9.55 0.60 12 255022 0.664 <5 7.98 625 0.91 70 3.3 3.49 2.19 23 255023 0.530 <5 6.53 277 5.13 45 38.0 10.2 1.05 18 255024 0.564 <5 8.14 951 1 04 44 24.5 1.57 1.54 19 I 255025 0.870 <5 8.91 19 3.12 103 6.3 13.5 0.03 74 255026 1.358 <5 6.70 259 5.46 42 110 10.4 1.13 15 255027 0.876 <5 6.55 241 5.45 46 75.5 10.6 1 03 13 I 255028 0.652 <5 6.97 78 5.80 44 147 9.95 0.32 10 255029 0.826 <5 6.48 347 6.31 76 140 11.3 1.17 24 255030 0.994 <5 7.48 212 6.44 88 132 9 01 0.70 21 255031 0.020 13 1.27 19 1.40 1070 952 8.68 0.10 12 I 255032 0.768 41 0.97 9 0.03 172 >10000 3.91 0.03 255033 0.316 <5 6.80 1170 1.05 49 110 1.79 3.47 13 •Rep 255009 20 I •Rep 255033 7.07 1200 1.08 51 112 1.77 3.47 13 I I

I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability. indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings"") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client"s direction. The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample"s representativity of the goods and stricUy relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration. forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com I

Page 3 of 7

Element Mg Mn Na Ni P S Sr Ti V Zn Method @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B I Det.Lim. 0.01 2 0.01 0.5 50 0.01 0.5 0.01 2 1 Units % ppm % ppm ppm % ppm % ppm ppm 255001 2.43 181 1.76 28.0 590 1 06 29.8 0.14 96 12 255002 3.81 222 0.96 34.1 480 0.89 16.1 0.10 117 15 I 255003 2.31 214 0.60 32.2 390 1.96 11 .1 0.17 104 14 255004 0.92 93 0.04 16.9 110 3.62 3.5 0.06 45 8 255005 0.27 37 <001 15.7 <50 4.56 2.0 0.01 13 4 1255006 0.17 26 <0.01 13.8 <50 4.62 2.1 0.01 10 11 255007 2.40 317 0.52 26.7 470 0.47 26.3 0.54 246 29 255008 2.54 371 0.86 28.4 380 0.20 17.8 0.45 187 30 255009 0.95 39 1.73 14.6 300 0.58 62.6 0.13 126 4 1255010 0.76 100 <0.01 6.8 160 0.18 4.0 0.21 82 13 255011 0.09 18 0.19 3.4 <50 0.02 6.5 0.01 17 2 255012 2.29 492 0.56 12.5 390 0.72 12.5 0.45 198 47 255013 1.51 161 0.13 15.6 150 0.02 7.4 0.06 89 12 I 255014 2.00 1810 2.50 20.6 810 0.18 611 0.86 371 92 255015 5.23 649 1.49 35.5 960 0.03 45.0 0.78 309 42 255016 7.22 1110 0.14 58.0 620 0.06 7.4 0.65 304 89 1255017 3.87 2170 1.69 55.9 780 0.08 438 0.76 320 168 255018 2.83 266 4.71 27.8 1230 0.11 74.1 0.28 62 22 255019 0.86 76 6.35 9.1 150 0.07 62.4 0.05 21 9 255020 1.52 589 3.87 26.3 1200 0.02 363 0.36 83 84 1255021 2.78 1590 1.79 34.8 680 0.07 172 0.71 333 116 255022 1.79 374 3.70 27.0 1010 0.03 269 0.31 70 46 255023 2.46 1480 1.78 34.8 740 0.04 162 0.61 272 102 255024 0.50 206 4.28 10.9 500 0.07 430 0.23 35 29 I 255025 9.72 2080 0.04 89.6 1440 0.02 7.3 1.48 438 208 255026 2.41 1680 1.91 23.1 940 0.08 269 0.79 351 131 255027 2.61 1690 2.00 21 .9 770 0.07 213 0.66 318 121 1255028 3 02 1710 2.09 37.4 630 0.06 177 0.70 325 111 255029 3.00 1770 1.23 45.0 1200 0.13 178 0.74 340 136 255030 3.73 1500 1.64 90.1 450 0.04 181 0.48 270 92 255031 >15 964 0.10 >10000 60 3.30 15.8 0.07 36 68 1255032 0.90 89 <0.01 11.1 100 2.00 4.2 0.05 32 7 255033 0.37 236 2.76 5.7 380 0.07 332 0.18 21 41 I *Rep 255033 0.36 232 2.84 5.2 370 0.06 345 0.18 21 39 I I

I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at hnp:/lwww.sgs.com/terms and conditions.hlm . Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client's direction. The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs.com I

Page 4 of 7

Element ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Method @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @I CM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B I Det.Lim. 0.5 0.02 1 0.1 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.1 5 0.1 Units ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm 255001 69.3 0.16 69 0.6 3.59 0.03 50.4 72.0 <5 24.0 255002 63.7 0.20 15 0.7 1.60 0.02 808 90.2 <5 25.0 I 255003 53 .7 0.54 17 0.7 7.21 0.03 60.7 69.3 <5 20.1 255004 230 0.69 38 0.3 7.38 0.02 23.9 80.6 <5 8.9 255005 5.5 0.55 139 0.2 13.8 <0.02 3.58 241 <5 4.3 I 255006 3.5 0.44 36 <0.1 5.37 <0.02 8.99 79.5 <5 3.0 255007 86.4 0.16 53 1.4 4.52 0.03 9.06 7.4 <5 26.9 255008 65.5 0.12 39 1.2 1.14 0.02 6.50 6.1 <5 23.7 255009 62.6 0.28 63 1.5 6.59 0.03 20.8 10.4 <5 14.7 1255010 28.8 0.19 56 1.2 0.35 0.03 2.87 1.4 <5 11 '1 255011 10.0 0.05 3 0.9 0.39 <0.02 4.64 0.5 <5 5.5 255012 88.2 0.19 4 0.5 0.83 0.02 8.03 23.4 <5 19.1 255013 27.4 0.03 3 0.6 0.22 <0.02 7.89 7.1 <5 9.6 I 255014 95.0 0.18 <1 1.1 0.25 0.05 31 .2 46.0 <5 23.1 255015 143 0.08 <1 1.9 0.31 0.05 29.2 31.3 <5 29.5 255016 106 0.08 <1 1.1 0.19 0.04 16.9 60.7 <5 21 .6 1255017 68.2 0.09 <1 1.2 0.26 0.07 29.3 53 .3 <5 19.3 255018 98.1 0.08 3 1.6 0.57 <0.02 37.9 14.2 <5 30.9 255019 71 .2 0.07 9 1.0 0.64 <0.02 11.4 4.0 <5 20.0 255020 74.6 0.08 <1 2.3 0.39 0.09 92.3 18.4 <5 23.2 1255021 102 0.14 <1 1.0 0.24 0.15 31 .3 49.5 <5 20.1 255022 80.9 0.10 <1 2.6 0.45 0.06 85.4 11.7 <5 25.5 255023 111 0.07 <1 1.4 0.25 0.13 39.5 41 .8 <5 20.1 255024 92.2 0.06 <1 2.6 0.31 0.05 25.1 6.1 <5 20.9 I 255025 187 0.16 <1 0.3 0.21 0.26 22.9 39.9 <5 34.0 255026 113 0.12 <1 1.5 0.21 0.12 48.8 44.8 <5 24.3 255027 84.1 0.09 <1 1.1 0.18 0.13 32.1 38.2 <5 20.2 1255028 95.4 0.13 <1 1.0 0.28 0.16 31 .0 53 .8 <5 20.3 255029 82.4 0.12 <1 1.0 0.20 0.23 37.7 46.6 <5 20.3 255030 52.5 0.07 <1 0.5 0.12 0.09 19.7 52.3 <5 16.9 255031 14.9 0.63 19 0.4 1.10 0.15 5.36 280 <5 3.3 1255032 13.4 0.63 2 0.3 4.54 <0.02 5.35 21.1 <5 7.7 255033 150 0.11 <1 1.9 0.11 0.03 91 .5 3.8 <5 17.9 I *Rep 255033 145 0.11 <1 2.0 0.12 0.04 97.9 3.9 <5 18.7 I I

I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms and conditions.htm . Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability. indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client's direction . The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample's representatlvity of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted . The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or fal sification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto 1(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca .sgs.com I

Page 5 of7

Element Hf In La Lu Mo Nb Pb Rb Sb Sc Method @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B I Det.Lim. 0.02 0.02 0.1 0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.05 0.1 Units ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm 255001 1.86 0.02 22.1 0.16 28.5 2.3 2.5 2.0 0.07 12.7 255002 1.62 0.06 3.7 0.16 23.8 0.7 1.2 1.5 0.05 14.3 I 255003 1.41 0.34 26.2 0.24 10.5 1.4 2.5 2.9 0.06 12.3 255004 0.60 0.42 11 .1 0.10 19.9 0.8 2.5 1.4 0.08 4.8 255005 0.13 0.42 1.6 0.03 5.88 0.2 3.2 1.8 0.11 1.1 I 255006 0.09 0.42 4.0 0.02 14.5 0.2 1.9 0.8 0.07 0.5 255007 2.31 0.05 4.0 0.20 28.0 4.1 5.3 12.7 0.44 30.8 255008 1.86 0.05 2.6 0.23 19.0 3.8 2.4 14.2 0.13 24.8 255009 1.85 <0.02 10.2 0.18 34.4 1.0 2.6 6.6 0.27 21.1 I 255010 0.79 0.03 1.2 0.07 41.4 1.7 13.0 28.0 0.22 10.2 255011 0.27 <0.02 2.4 <0.01 10.2 0.4 2.1 19.7 0.06 0.2 255012 2.37 0.04 2.8 0.29 9.77 4.3 4.8 22.4 0.07 19.5 255013 0.74 <0.02 3.6 0.08 3.64 0.4 1.3 2.1 <0.05 10.7 I 255014 2.35 0.12 15.2 0.56 3.87 2.7 6.3 8.9 0.07 48.1 255015 4.16 0.08 10.7 0.78 0.44 0.4 2.9 11.9 <0.05 53.6 255016 2.70 0.11 4.3 0.42 1.57 1.9 0.6 29.3 <0.05 38.2 I 255017 1.60 0.10 13.8 0.46 0.66 0.9 8.0 57.6 0.06 49.4 255018 3.20 0.03 19.6 0.12 5.55 8.6 5.1 6.6 <0.05 14.9 255019 2.71 <0.02 5.0 0.05 2.06 6.7 6.1 0.5 0.14 2.4 255020 1.97 0.03 45.6 0.14 6.26 5.9 11.9 71 .0 0.07 10.7 I 255021 2.23 0.10 14.7 0.49 1.22 1.9 6.5 39.2 <0.05 46.3 255022 2.35 0.05 43.4 0.15 6.19 6.0 8.4 92.8 0.07 9.0 255023 2.60 0.10 18.7 0.57 0.39 0.5 7.7 75.6 0.06 39.9 255024 2.09 <0.02 9.6 0.04 7.22 4.4 8.2 47.2 0.07 1.9 1255025 4.59 0.04 7.5 0.55 0.55 15.7 1.8 2.0 0.10 50.1 255026 3.23 0.13 23.4 0.68 1.82 0.6 7.8 79.3 <0.05 47.8 255027 2.08 0.10 15.2 0.53 0.36 0.2 5.9 84.8 <0.05 44.6 I 255028 2.23 0.10 15.0 0.49 2.06 1.9 6.8 16.9 0.06 49.3 255029 2.09 0.12 17.7 0.59 0.38 0.3 10.6 62.4 <0.05 45.5 255030 0.85 0.06 9.4 0.28 2.59 2.6 3.6 47.2 <0.05 39.0 255031 0.35 0.08 2.9 0.06 2.17 0.9 5.3 9.3 0.79 8.5 I 255032 0.37 0.38 2.6 0.06 5.68 0.4 1.1 1.0 0.06 4.0 255033 3.97 <0.02 51.6 0.15 8.54 8.6 25.0 107 <0.05 2.0 I *Rep 255033 4.17 <0.02 56.4 0.15 8.58 8.6 25.5 112 <0.05 2.0 I I

I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sqs.com/terms and conditions.htm. Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability. indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings"") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client"s direction. The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample"s representativity of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration. forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445--4152 www.ca.sgscom Member of the SGS Group (SOCI•t• General• de Surveillance) I

Page 6 of?

Element Se Sn Ta Tb Te Th Tl U W Y Method @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B @ICM40B I Det.Lim. 2 0.3 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.1 Units ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm 255001 7 0.5 0.23 0.40 0.19 3.8 0.04 3.45 0.3 7.9 255002 4 0.5 <0.05 0.14 0.11 2.4 0.03 1.66 0.2 7.0 I 255003 8 2.0 0.09 0.53 0.08 1.8 0.05 2.66 0.2 11 .5 255004 18 1.8 <0.05 0.20 0.13 0.8 0.04 0.67 0.3 4.7 255005 14 1.8 <0.05 <0.05 0.14 <0.2 0.05 0.38 0.2 1.2 I 255006 20 1.5 <0.05 <0.05 0.14 <0.2 0.02 0.17 0.2 0.6 255007 3 0.9 0.29 0.18 0.25 1.6 0.07 0.72 0.4 6.8 255008 <2 0.8 0.25 0.36 0.06 1.1 0.10 0.65 0.5 13.0 255009 5 0.5 0.06 0.21 0.98 1.3 0.08 0.68 0.3 6.6 1255010 2 0.4 0.09 0.06 0.37 0.5 0.11 0.15 0.4 2.1 255011 <2 <0.3 <0.05 <0.05 0.25 0.7 0.05 0.31 0.2 0.4 255012 <2 0.8 0.28 0.35 0.25 2.5 0.13 0.90 0.4 14.7 255013 <2 <0.3 <0.05 0.09 <0.05 0.4 <0.02 0.29 0.1 2.9 I 255014 <2 1.6 0.14 1.01 <0.05 3.3 0.23 0.82 <0.1 38.4 255015 <2 1.5 <0.05 1.44 <0.05 3.7 0.09 3.98 <0.1 50 .6 255016 <2 1.0 <0.05 0.75 <0.05 2.6 0.16 1.00 <0.1 26.3 1255017 <2 0.9 <0.05 0.89 <0.05 2.9 0.29 0.73 <0.1 31 .9 255018 <2 0.9 0.73 0.29 0.06 9.6 0.05 4.48 0.4 6.3 255019 <2 0.6 1.21 0.09 <0.05 5.2 0.02 2.09 0.1 2.1 255020 <2 1.1 0.41 0.55 <0.05 5.0 0.33 1.79 0.4 11 .0 I 255021 <2 1.2 0.06 0.87 <0.05 3.2 0.22 0.81 <0.1 33.2 255022 <2 1.4 0.47 0.56 <0.05 5.8 0.44 2.57 0.6 11 .6 255023 <2 1.1 <0.05 1.04 <0.05 4.2 0.45 1.11 <0.1 38.0 255024 <2 1.1 0.37 0.17 <0.05 2.7 0.31 1.35 1.3 3.1 I 255025 <2 2.0 0.91 0.65 <0.05 2.4 0.05 1.56 0.4 23.9 255026 <2 1.3 <0.05 1.30 <0.05 4.3 0.45 1.10 <0.1 45.8 255027 <2 0.8 <0.05 0.95 <0.05 2.5 0.43 0.69 <0.1 34.2 1255028 <2 1.2 <0.05 0.88 <0.05 3.3 0.13 0.88 <0.1 32.6 255029 <2 0.7 <0.05 1.15 <0.05 3.2 0.38 0.76 <0.1 41 .3 255030 <2 0.7 0.12 0.54 <0.05 1.6 0.26 0.40 0.2 19.4 255031 <2 1.2 0.09 0.09 0.15 1.1 0.23 0.34 4.5 3.5 I 255032 18 1.0 <0.05 0.09 0.10 0.3 0.02 0.60 0.2 3.0 255033 <2 0.8 0.61 0.49 <0.05 17.5 0.64 2.71 0.3 11 .4 I *Rep 255033 <2 0.9 0.63 0.49 <0.05 19.1 0.65 2.40 0.3 11 .9 I I

I This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at htlp:llwww.sgs.com/terms and conditions.htm . Atlention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client's direction . The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample's representativi\y of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin I or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement purposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs com

I Memb•r of the BGS GrCHip ('SociOtCt GOMrale de Surv•lll•nee) ------~------I

Page 7 of 7

Element Yb Cu Method @ICM40B @ICP90Q I Det.Lim. 0.1 0.01 Units ppm % 255001 1.0 NA 255002 0.9 NA I 255003 1.5 1.32 255004 0.6 2.00 255005 0.1 1.70 255006 <0.1 2.40 I 255007 1.1 NA 255008 1.4 NA 255009 1.0 NA I 255010 0.3 NA 255011 <0 ~ 1 NA 255012 1.8 NA 255013 0~5 NA I 255014 3.8 NA 255015 4.9 NA 255016 2.7 NA 255017 3.2 NA I 255018 0.7 NA 255019 03 NA 255020 0~9 NA I 255021 3.3 NA 255022 1.0 NA 255023 3.9 NA 255024 0.3 NA I 255025 3.2 NA 255026 4.6 NA 255027 3.6 NA 255028 3.3 NA I 255029 4.2 NA 255030 1.9 NA 255031 0.4 NA I 255032 0.4 1.82 255033 1.0 NA *Rep 255033 1.0 I I I

This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sqs~com/terrns and conditions.htm ~Attention is drawn to the limitation of I liability, indemnification and jurisdiction issues defined therein.

WARNING: The sample(s) to which the findings recorded herein (the "Findings") relate was (were) drawn and I or provided by the Client or by a third party acting at the Client's direction~ The Findings constitute no warranty of the sample's representativity of the goods and strictly relate to the sample(s). The Company accepts no liability with regard to the origin or source from which the sample(s) is/are said to be extracted. The findings report on the samples provided by the client and are not intended for commercial or contractual settlement I purposes. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I SGS Canada Inc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.ca.sgs com APPENDIX Ill

Prospecting and Sampling Log Prospecting and Sampling Daily Log (see also Appendix 1, List of Rock Samples and Fig. 3 2010 Field Program Map)

July 14 Travel to property area from Toronto, stay at Elliot Lake. July 15 Recon into Esten Property via 4-W truck, search for old trenches and re-discover of 2003 grid baseline, commence clearing of old trenches on grid, Clms# 3001410, 3009999 . July 16 Examination, Clearing and sampling of old trenches (E-TR-1A, 1 B, 2, 3, 4, 5) along south cherty horizon, Clms# 3001410, 3009999 July 17 Examination of known showings along north cherty horizon situated north of trenches, and following their geological trend WNW and ESE (E-NS-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) in thick bush. Clms# 3001410, 3001409, 3009999 July 18 Prospecting west from the trenched area (E-NS-7, 8, E-SS-1 , 2), Clms# 3001410, 3001408. July 19 Prospecting in partially clear cut area further to the west (E-NW-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), Clms# 3001408, 3005186, 1191953, 3016177. July 20 Prospecting in NW part of the property access from north road continuing around lake and back to the partially clear cut area, (E-NW-1 0, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16), Clm# 3016177. July 21 Prospecting in thick bush directly south of the trenches (E-SA-3, 4, 5, 6) , Clm# 3001410. July 22 Prospecting southern part of property along north side of creek (E-SA-7, 8) , Clms# 300141 0' 300 1411 . July 23 More prospecting in thick bush directly south of the trenches and towards the southeast part of property (E-SA-9, 10, 11, 12, 13), Clms# 3001410, 3001411 . July 24 Back to main trenched area, additional sampling and attempt to follow geological trend from trench showings towards the east in thick bush, partial rehabilitation of baseline and some grid lines east of showings (E-TR-38), Clms# 3001410, 3009999, 3006053. July 25 Travel from property area back to Toronto. ... · : . . . . . ··"' . . . ··~ . . . .: ...... ~ •.• :::•:· ...... • ·.·: .. • ~ :~ ...... -· , - :: ... • :# ...... :...... :.:. :# ~::;•• ·~: ..... ·~= :: ...,.. ~= ·: :~...... ·~ .:.: .:...... ·: ...... •• .. ·~· • ·:.· ...... ,. . •. •.•.s.. .• ":-'': ~ELIANT GOLD CORP. ESTEN PROPERTY ONTARIO (See Appendix for GPS Locations and Samples Names)

J".,ty{[j ------! ______ESTEN TOWNSHIP

N 2010 FIELD PROGRAM • - Samples for Geochecmial Analysis , _ . '( ...... !>.:·~·. ~-:S • ~- Other Samples {not analysed)

Scale 1 F I&- 3 (iil!ilfiiyf!§@llibl'•jt#t'i@vi'&::SW!t;-: ti•4hl!tf!£jif&¥§¥iJ ...... :...... : ...... :...... :...... :...... :...... :...... - ...... · .. :..: ...... :...... - .:...... ·.... .'.. : ... : ...... :...... :· ...... ·.· ...... 729 rn ..'... : ...... :..... :...~ :. ....: ...... :...... :...... :.: ......