Sustainable Infrastructure and Asset Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Infrastructure and Asset Management SSustainableustainable IInfrastructurenfrastructure andand AAssetsset MManagementanagement KiyoshiKiyoshi KOBAYASHIKOBAYASHI WhatWhat isis AssetAsset Management?Management? TheThe optimaloptimal allocationallocation ofof thethe scarescare budgetbudget betweenbetween thethe newnew arrangearrange--mentment ofof infrastructureinfrastructure andand rehabilitation/maintenancerehabilitation/maintenance ofof thethe existingexisting infrastructureinfrastructure toto maximizemaximize thethe valuevalue ofof thethe stockstock ofof infrastructureinfrastructure andand toto realizerealize thethe maximummaximum outcomesoutcomes forfor thethe citizenscitizens AssetAsset managementmanagement Pavement management (highway, runway) Railway management Bridge management Facility management Tunnel management Water supply system management Port facility management Embankment management Slope management River facility/Dam facility management Forest management DamDam FacilityFacility ManagementManagement LongLong--termterm SustainableSustainable InfrastructureInfrastructure ComprehensiveComprehensive managementmanagement ofof sedimentationsedimentation systemssystems (( environmental change, ecological impacts, riverbed degradation, river morphology change, and coastal erosion ) LargeLarge--scalescale risksrisks (( socio-economic change, volatility in sedimentation, green house effects ) DamDam facilitiesfacilities basedbased onon renewalrenewal durationduration andand managementmanagement pointspoints Renewal Facilities Management Others duration points Short Mechanical Reduction of total Improvement of service Several yrs - Electrical cost of Inspection, level Several 10 yrs Architectural Maintenance, Technical Innovation Repair and Long Reservoir LongRenewal Life Renewal duration will be Several 10 yrs - (Sedimentatio Reduction of Life expanded by proper Several 100 yrs n) Cycle cost countermeasures Extra long Dam body Reduction of No Renewal will be Inspection and necessary for extra long Maintenance cost duration and present value Risk assessment of the renewal can not be Occasional Reservoir slope Inspection Respondevaluated up to certain level Land slide Immediate action during construction period Earthquake HierarchicalHierarchical assetasset managementmanagement cyclescycles Plan Do Budget allocation Plan benchmarking innovation Do R/M See strategies Plan See R/M activities See Do ProbabilisticProbabilistic analysisanalysis ofof reservoirreservoir sedimentationsedimentation 99.9 4500 4000 99 3500 (%) 3000 F /year) 2 2500 90 2000 /km 3 80 1500 70 1000 60 Specific Specific sediment yield(m 50 500 40 0 30 20 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 Year 10 KAWAMATA dam (Tone River) 1 0.1 Annual record of specific Non-exceeding probability sediment yield can be plotted on 0.01 110102 103 104 105 log-normal probability paper Specific sediment yield using Weibull plot. (m3/km2/year) F(xi)=i/(N+1) ExpectedExpected grossgross storagestorage capacitycapacity changechange withoutwithout sedimentationsedimentation managementmanagement All new proposal and under Existing storage construction projects included capacity 350 18 m ) Total storage ) 3 300 3 16 Total st orage capacity Wit hout new dams 14 c apac it y 250 Total Total Without new dams sediment at ion 12 200 sedimentation 100million 10 Sediment at i on r at e Sediment at ion rat e 100millionm 150y( 0.24%/ yr 8 0.42%/yr acit 100p 6 Ca 50 4 Capacity( 2 0 Year Year 0 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 JapanJapan ChubuChubu ReRegiongion ReservoirReservoir sedimentationsedimentation inin SakumaSakuma damdam J-Power (EPDC) 1956 Power generation Gravity concrete Height=155.5 m FutureFuture estimationestimation ofof reservoirreservoir sedimentationsedimentation inin SakumaSakuma damdam 320 平岡ダム 300 標高(ELm) 新豊根発電所放水口 280 201yr 260 クレスト敷高 101yr EL246.5m 240 豊川用水 取水口 220 佐久間ダム建設前の河床高 200 佐久間発電所 予備放流水位 180 取水口 常時満水位 堆砂101年後 160 堆砂201年後 建設前河床勾配の1/ 2勾配で堆砂(泰阜ダムの実績値) 140 昭和55年度最深河床高 建設前河床勾配の1/ 3.2勾配で堆砂(平岡ダムの実績値) 平岡地区護岸高 120 天竜中学校構内 平岡PS放水位 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 ダムからの距離(km) SedimentationSedimentation managementmanagement damsdams inin JapanJapan Classification Place Details of sediment control measures Examples in Japan Reduction of sediment production by hillside and valley works Upstream Regulation of reservoirs and sediment by erosion control dams Sabo area, Changing from sediment check dams to reservoirs and slit dams sediment control dams (slit dams) Reducing sediment Reduction of discharged sediment and river course stabilization flowing into by channel works reservoirs Regurally excavating and recycling for End of Sediment check Miwa Dam, Koshibu Dam, Nagashima Dam, aggregate or sediment supply to reservoirs dam Matsukawa Dam, Yokoyama Dam 57dams downstream river End of Asahi Dam, Miwa Dam, Koshibu Dam, Matsukawa Sediment bypass reservoirs Dam, Yokoyama Dam Sediment Sabaishigawa Dam Sediment routing sluicing Dashidaira Dam-Unazuki Dam (Coordinated sluicing ) Sediment Inside Non-gate botom outlets Masudagawa Dam management reservoirs (natural flushing) Density current Botom outlets for flood control Koshibu Dam, Futase Dam, Kigawa Dam venting Non-gate conduits with curtain wall Katagiri Dam Selective withdrawal works Yahagi Dam Drawdown Sediment flushing outlet Dashidaira Dam-Unazuki Dam (Coordinated flushing) flushing Partial flushing Inside Sediment flushing without Sediment scoring gate Senzu Dam, Yasuoka Dam reservoirs drawdown Sediment scoring pipe Ikawa Dam Excavating & Miwa Dam, Koshibu Dam, Sakuma Dam, Hiraoka Dam, Recycling for concrete aggregate Dreging Yasuoka Dam Soil improving material, Farm Land Miwa Dam, Yanase Dam filling, Banking material Sediment replacing inside reservoir Sakuma Dam Akiba Dam, Futase Dam, Miharu Dam, Nagayasuguchi Sediment supplying to downstream rivers Dam, Nagashima Dam ReservoirReservoir sedimentationsedimentation Upstream→ Coarse sediment Fine sediment ←Dam body Excavated and utilized for Kobe Airport DevelopmentDevelopment ofof efficientefficient andand environmentallyenvironmentally compatiblecompatible sedimentsediment managementmanagement techniquestechniques "Take","Take", "Transport""Transport" andand "Discharge""Discharge" - Sediment flushing/sluicing and sediment bypassing should be introduced more. - The sediment trucking and supply, and the Hydro-suction Sediment Removal System (HSRS) are needs to be improved furthermore and introduced as supplementary measures. AssetAsset managementmanagement LifeLife cyclecycle costcost (LCC)(LCC) minimizationminimization RehabilitationRehabilitation andand MaintenanceMaintenance fromfrom proactiveproactive maintenancemaintenance toto preventivepreventive maintenancemaintenance Operation,Operation, Replacement,Replacement, Expansion,Expansion, Removal,Removal, RealReal OptionOption AssetAsset managementmanagement technologytechnology 11 InspectionInspection technologytechnology InventoryInventory DatabaseDatabase ToolTool boxbox PerformancePerformance curvecurve (Markov(Markov matrix)matrix) LCCLCC evaluationevaluation (Markov(Markov decisiondecision model)model) ComputerComputer systemssystems AssetAsset managementmanagement technologytechnology 22 ProcessProcess evaluation/reengineeringevaluation/reengineering PolicyPolicy evaluationevaluation (outcome/output/input)(outcome/output/input) PPerformanceerformance--basedbased assetasset managementmanagement contractcontract CitizenCitizen participationparticipation TwoTwo--stagedstaged projectproject t 0 t1 t2 30 70 Cost 30 billion JPY 100 billion JPY 70 billion JPY Benefit three scenarios 1/3 18 billion JPY 1/3 90 billion JPY 1/ 3 0 billion JPY CostCost--benefitbenefit analysisanalysis B = (1/3) 180 + (1/3) 90 + (1/3) 0 = 90 C = 100 B - C = 90 -100 = - 10 decline Real Option Additional cost 70 billion JPY B – C = 180-70 = 110 Scenario 1 B – C = 90 – 70 = 20 Scenario 2 B – C = 0 - 70 = - 70 Scenario 3 decline (1/3) 110+ (1/3) 20 + (1/30) 0 =43.3 Real Option = 43.3- 30 = 13.3 > 0 investment LifeLife cyclecycle coursecourse decisiondecision makingmaking asas aa realreal optionoption university occupation spouse ・・・・・ ・・ integrity responsibility accountability.
Recommended publications
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published online version may require a subscription. Link to publisher’s version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3168-4 Citation: Hanmaiahgari PR, Gompa NR, Pal D et al (2018) Numerical modelling of the Sakuma Dam reservoir sedimentation. Natural Hazards. 91(3): 1075-1096. Copyright statement: © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018. Reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. This is a post-peer- review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Natural Hazards. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3168-4. Numerical modeling of the Sakuma Dam reservoir sedimentation Prashanth R. Hanmaiahgari*, Nooka Raju Gompa, Debasish Pal, Jaan H Pu *Prashanth Reddy Hanmaiahgari, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Eng., Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India 721302. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) Nooka Raju Gompa, Graduate student, Dept. of Civil Eng., Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India 721302. E-mail: [email protected] Debasish Pal, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India, Present Address: Engineering Systems and Design Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Technical Regulation on Hydropower Civil Works
    SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Ministry of Construction (MOC) Guideline for Technical Regulation on Hydropower Civil Works Design and Construction of Civil Works and Hydromechanical Equipment Final Draft June 2013 Japan International Cooperation Agency Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. Shikoku Electric Power Co., Inc. West Japan Engineering Consultants, Inc. IL CR(2) 13-096 Guideline for QCVN xxxx : 2013/BXD Table of Contents 1. Scope of application .................................................................................................. 1 2. Reference documents ............................................................................................... 1 3. Nomenclatures and definitions ................................................................................. 1 4. Classification of works .............................................................................................. 1 4.1 General stipulation ................................................................................................. 1 4.2 Principles for the classification of hydropower works .............................................. 2 5. Guarantee of serving level of hydropower works .................................................... 7 6. Safety coefficient of hydropower civil works ........................................................... 7 7. Construction of hydropower civil works ................................................................ 26 7.1 General requirements .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2 共通表記編(Pdf:1518Kb)
    長野県案内サイン整備指針 2 共通表記編 令和2年6月 目 次 第1章 基本的事項 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 1 目 的 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 2 指針の対象範囲 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 第2章 言語表記 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 1 表記する言語 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 2 日本語の表記方法 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 3 外国語の表記方法 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2 (1)英語表記 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2 (2)英語表記例 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 7 第3章 ピクトグラム ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 21 1 ピクトグラムの活用 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 21 (1)使用するピクトグラム ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 21 (2)ピクトグラム使用上の注意 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 21 (3)ピクトグラムの推奨度 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 21 2 ピクトグラム一覧 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 22 第1章 基本的事項 1 目 的 外国人観光客等が安心して目的地へ移動できるよう、わかりやすい案内サインの整備を行う にあたって、統一した言語及びピクトグラムの表記が行えるよう、必要な情報を提供する。 2 指針の対象範囲 車両や歩行者を対象とした公共案内サイン(文字、絵などの視覚的要素を媒体として、公共 的な性格の強い情報を伝達する案内サインで、市町村等が設置するもの)を対象とする。 ただし、法令等により別途定めがあるもの、表記を見直した場合、混乱が生じる可能性があ るものは除く。 第2章 言語表記 1 表記する言語 日本語及び英語の併記を基本とする。 施設特性や地域特性の観点から、中国語(簡体字、繁体字)又は韓国語等の表記が必要とさ れる場合は、視認性に配慮した上で併せて記載を検討する。 2 日本語の表記方法 日本語の表記方法は、「観光活性化標識ガイドライン」に準じるものとする。 表‐1 日本語表記の基準 表記の基準 表記の例 原則として国文法、現代仮名遣いによる表記を行う。ただし、固 有名詞においてはこの限りではない。 正式名称の他に通称がある施設名は地域において統一した名称 を使用する。 表示面の繁雑化を防ぐために、明確に理解される範囲内で省略で 長野県立若里公園 きる部分を省略する。 ⇒若里公園 アルファベットによる名称が慣用化されている場合は、それを用 東日本旅客鉄道(株) いても良い。 ⇒JR東日本 数字の表記は、原則として算用数字を用いる。ただし、固有名詞 5月5日 として用いる場合はこの限りではない。また、○丁目のように地 第二別館 名として用いる場合は漢数字を使用する。 一番町二丁目 地名、歴史上の人名など読みにくい漢字にはふりがなを付記する 等の配慮を行う。 紀年は西暦により表記する。必要に応じて日本年号を付記しても 2020年 良い。 2020年(令和2年) 参考資料:観光活性化標識ガイドライン(平成17年6月、国土交通省総合政策局)
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Life of Reservoirsextending the Life Sustainable Sediment for Dams Management DIRECTIONS in DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS in Energy and Mining Energy
    Extending the Life of ReservoirsExtending the Life DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT Energy and Mining Annandale, Morris, and KarkiAnnandale, Extending the Life of Reservoirs Sustainable Sediment Management for Dams and Run-of-River Hydropower George W. Annandale, Gregory L. Morris, and Pravin Karki Extending the Life of Reservoirs DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT Energy and Mining Extending the Life of Reservoirs Sustainable Sediment Management for Dams and Run-of-River Hydropower George W. Annandale, Gregory L. Morris, and Pravin Karki © 2016 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 19 18 17 16 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpreta- tions, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo.
    [Show full text]
  • Dams in Japan Overview 2018
    Dams in Japan Overview 2018 Tokuyama Dam JAPAN COMMISSION ON LARGE DAMS CONTENTS Japan Commission on Large Dams History … …………………………………………………………………… 1 Operation … ………………………………………………………………… 1 Organization… ……………………………………………………………… 1 Membership… ……………………………………………………………… 1 Publication…………………………………………………………………… 2 Annual lecture meeting… …………………………………………………… 2 Contribution to ICOLD… …………………………………………………… 2 Dams in Japan Development of dams … …………………………………………………… 3 Major dams in Japan… ……………………………………………………… 4 Hydroelectric power plants in Japan… ……………………………………… 5 Dams completed in 2014 − 2016 in Japan … ……………………………… 6 Isawa Dam… ……………………………………………………………… 7 Kyogoku Dam … ………………………………………………………… 9 Kin Dam…………………………………………………………………… 11 Yubari-Shuparo Dam… …………………………………………………… 13 Tokunoshima Dam………………………………………………………… 15 Tsugaru Dam… …………………………………………………………… 17 Introduction to Dam Technologies in Japan Trapezoidal CSG dam … …………………………………………………… 19 Sediment bypass tunnel (SBT)… …………………………………………… 19 Preservation measures of dam reservoirs… ………………………………… 19 Advancement of flood control operation… ………………………………… 20 Dam Upgrading Vision… …………………………………………………… 21 Utilization of ICT in construction of dam… ………………………………… 22 Papers in ICOLD & Other Technical Publications Theme 1 Safety supervision and rehabilitation of existing dams…………… 23 Theme 2 New construction technology … ………………………………… 26 Theme 3 Flood, spillway and outlet works… ……………………………… 29 Theme 4 Earthquakes and dams… ………………………………………… 30 Theme 5 Reservoir sedimentation and sustainable development……………
    [Show full text]
  • Sabo Vignette Adaptive River Sediment Management in Upper Tenryu Reach
    SaboVignette Adaptiveriversedimentmanagement inUpperTenryuReach HiroakiNakaya Dr.Agr.,P.E. TenryuRiverUpperReachOffice ChubuRegionalDevelopmentBureau MinistryofLand,Infrastructure,TransportandTourism,JAPAN Sabo Vignette Adaptive river sediment management in Upper Tenryu* Reach *Note: The name of the river has appeared in various documents since as early as 8th century. It has shifted from Ara-Tama, through Hirose, to present Tenryu. Each has an implication of its own. Ara is a name of wild coastal ruling tribe whereas Tama is a title of a princess in upper reach. A metaphor of a marital bondage between two different tribal groups. Hirose is simpler, in that Hiro is an adjective wide while Se is shallow water. Chinese letters of Tenryu are made of two parts: Ten and Ryu. Ten is heaven (caelum in Latin, celestial/heavenly as adjective). Ryu is a flying entity, generally of good intention to proclaim prophetic messages. Therefore, cherubim river would be the literal translation in English. Folklore used Ookawa, or Kawa, each of which merely indicates big river or river itself respectively. The upper reach is also called under the name of Inadani, which is Ina valley, consisting of a basin. I. Scope Sabo work is a form of mass wasting management. It has also been transcribed as erosion and sediment control/management, but the Japanese noun “dosha” is more precisely mass in general than sediment, which may invoke a sense of material deposited in channels. Destabilization initiates mass movement. It sustains damages acutely and undesirable impacts latently upon the society in basin-wide scale, depending upon the timing and locality. The mass focused upon is chiefly the one destabilized by natural factors such as slope surface water and ground water produced by precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • 汽水域=Estuarine Region
    Estimation of Potential Sediment Yield by integrating USLE with GIS -A case study at Tenryu Watershed in Central Japan- Kazutoshi HOSHIKAWA, Masashi KAWABATA, Madhusudan B. SHRESTHA and Jun SUZUKI Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University 8304 Minamiminowa, Kamiina, Nagano, 399-4598, Japan, [email protected] Abstract: The Japanese archipelago has high potentiality in producing huge sediments due to its topographical and hydro-meteorological conditions. Of all, Tenryu basin, having its headwater sources in the highest mountain ranges, the Japanese Alps in Central Japan, is one of the highest sediment yield river. Frequent fluctuation of channel beds and deposition of huge sediments in the reservoirs have been a severe problem. In order to control flood and manage river system, an integrated management of entire watershed is considered to be a desirable strategy; therefore, estimation of potential sediment yield in a large watershed, has been an important issue. This study was attempted to estimate the sediment yield at eight sub-watersheds: Yokokawa, Katagiri, Matsukawa, Shintoyone, Minowa, Miwa, Koshibu and Misakubo watersheds of the Tenryu basin using USLE model incorporated with GIS techniques, and validated the estimated sediment yield with the actual sedimentation measured from their corresponding reservoirs. From the study, it was found that the variation of observed annual sedimentation at reservoirs has showed similar trend with the estimated USLE values within the studied watershed. This outcome suggests the reliability and adaptability of the USLE method that is integrated with GIS in estimating annual potential sediment yield in the large watershed having complex topography and geology. Keywords: USLE, GIS, Sediment production, Tenryu River sub watershed 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You Very Much for Your Kind Attention !
    The Study on Countermeasures for Sedimentaion Workshop IV, Surakarta, January 18, 2007 in The Wonogiri Multipurpose Dam Reservoir Master Plan on Sustainable Management of Wonogiri Reservoir in The Republic of Indonesia Mitigation Measures of Impacts Present Sediment N Discharge at Babat Basic Policy BENGAWAN SOLO Barrage (Ex.) Operation Rule “To minimize the Q, Turbidity Allowable limit of 22.9 million Impact to the d/s” m3/year concentration & m3/year by careful gate operation duration shall be defined N Combined operation BENGAWANbetween SOLO Wonogiri Dam and Colo Weir Sediment Discharge from Wonogiri Monitoring in Increase of sediment to be 0.8 million downstream reaches m3/year discharge to Solo River Operable period SCALE estuary will be approx. shall be strictly 5%0 15 30 45 60 75 90 km SCALE prohibited in dry 5% 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 km Flushing season Thank You very much for Your Kind Attention ! Japan International Cooperation Agency – JICA Ministry of Public Works The Republic of Indonesia Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. and Yachiyo Engineering Co. Ltd. 䋭㩷㪈㪉㪋㩷䋭 Page / 6 Estimating sediment volume into Brantas River after eruption of Kelud volcano on 1990 Mr. Takeshi Shimizu National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management 䋭㩷㪈㪉㪌㩷䋭 IEstimating Sediment volume into Brantas River after eruption of Kelud Voncano on 1990 Takeshi SHIMIZU1, Nobutomo OSANAI1 and Hideyuki ITOU1 1National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan The Brantas River that flows through East Java Province, the Republic of Indonesia, is the second largest river. It has 11,800km2 catchment areas and total length of the river approximately 320km.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulating Bathymetric Changes in Reservoirs Due to Sedimentation
    Examensarbete TVVR 12/5018 Simulating bathymetric changes in reservoirs due to sedimentation Application to Sakuma dam, Japan 2012 __________________________________________________________________ Qaid Beebo Raja Ahmed Bilal Division of Water Resources Engineering Department of Building and Environmental Technology Lund University Avdelningen för Teknisk Vattenresurslära TVVR-12/5018 ISSN-1101-9824 Simulating bathymetric changes in reservoirs due to sedimentation Application to Sakuma dam, Japan 2012 Qaid Beebo Raja Ahmed Bilal Abstract Currently sedimentation is one of the major issues to deal with, for professionals, as it causes continuous loss of storage and hinder the intended purposes of a dam. More research and case-specific studies are required to understand the behavior of sediment transport mechanism in order to propose remedial measures. Sakuma dam on Tenryu River in Japan is one of the largest dams in Japan and it is rapidly losing its storage capacity due to sedimentation. The dam started its operations in 1957. To study the bathymetric changes upstream of the dam, a mathematical modeling approach was selected using HEC RAS to simulate the existing changes and predict future trends. Before going into the detailed modeling, a literature review has been made about different sediment- related studies on the river and Sakuma dam to get deeper insight and to build a conceptual model. Then a reach of about 32 km of Tenryu River, from Hiraoka dam to Sakuma dam was modeled. Google Earth and AutoCAD were used to extract the geometrical data of Tenryu River to be used as input in HEC-RAS. Other data about flow and sedimentation were obtained from the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001
    Financial Highlights Millions of yen Years ended March 31 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Operating revenues ¥0,440,113 ¥0,451,096 ¥0,476,217 ¥0,451,543 ¥0,450,330 ¥0,495,307 Income from electric power sales 383,099 392,565 416,849 392,474 385,719 425,184 Hydroelectric 132,941 139,834 143,997 145,643 144,114 144,100 Thermal 250,158 252,731 272,851 246,830 241,604 281,084 Income from wheeling — — — — 62,287 67,095 Other operating revenues 57,013 58,530 59,368 59,069 2,324 3,026 Operating expenses 347,112 357,210 372,563 345,367 344,493 384,937 Operating income 93,001 93,886 103,654 106,176 105,837 110,369 Financial revenues 883 751 611 623 409 159 Financial expenses 84,748 84,165 86,537 72,694 72,784 76,718 Income from overseas technical service 1,718 1,677 1,613 1,353 1,651 1,534 Expenses on overseas technical service 1,511 1,510 1,505 1,149 1,362 1,221 Other income 840 175 101 768 416 3,492 Other expenses 139 159 1,274 2,618 1,248 2,280 Gross profit 10,044 10,656 16,662 32,459 32,919 35,334 Reserve for drought — — (77) (403) 131 — Extraordinary loss — — — — (12,645) (11,670) Income before income taxes 10,044 10,656 16,584 32,056 20,405 23,664 Income taxes (5,186) (5,118) (9,339) (16,195) (13,326) (15,583) Deferred income taxes — — — — 5,622 6,677 Net income 4,857 5,538 7,245 15,860 12,702 14,757 Total shareholders’ equity 90,203 91,424 94,354 105,908 120,185 130,637 Total assets 1,877,683 1,975,394 2,100,181 2,174,729 2,282,881 2,356,878 Per share: Net income (Yen) 68.80.
    [Show full text]
  • Aa2013-5 Aircraft Accident Investigation Report
    AA2013-5 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT CHUBU REGIONAL BUREAU, MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND TOURISM (OPERATED BY CONTRACTED NAKANIHON AIR SERVICE) J A 6 8 1 7 June 28, 2013 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board and with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation is to determine the causes of an accident and damage incidental to such an accident, thereby preventing future accidents and reducing damage. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Norihiro Goto Chairman, Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT HARD LANDING CHUBU REGIONAL BUREAU, MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND TOURISM (OPERATED BY CONTRACTED NAKANIHON AIR SERVICE) BELL 412EP (ROTORCRAFT), JA6817 UPSTREAM OF NAGASHIMA DAM TEMPORARY HELIPAD KAWANEHON-CHO, HAIBARA-GUN, SHIZUOKA PREFECTURE, JAPAN 12:54 JST, JUNE 29, 2012 June 7, 2013 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Shinsuke Endoh Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Sadao Tamura Member Yuki Shuto Member Keiji Tanaka SYNOPSIS <Summary of the Accident> On June 29 (Friday), 2012 at 12:54 Japan Standard Time (JST: UTC +9hrs, all times are indicated in JST on a 24-hour clock), a Bell 412EP, registered JA6817, owned by Chubu Regional Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (operated by contracted Nakanihon Air Service) experienced a hard landing when attempting to land at upstream of Nagashima Dam temporary helipad.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Simulation of Bathymetric Changes Due to Reservoir Sedimentation: a Japanese Case Study
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Qualitative simulation of bathymetric changes due to reservoir sedimentation: A Japanese case study Ahmed Bilal1, Wenhong Dai1,2,3*, Magnus Larson4, Qaid Naamo Beebo4, Qiancheng Xie1 1 College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China, 2 State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing China, 3 National Engineering Research Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Engineering Safety, Nanjing, China, 4 Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Sediment-dynamics modeling is a useful tool for estimating a dam's lifespan and its cost± benefit analysis. Collecting real data for sediment-dynamics analysis from conventional field survey methods is both tedious and expensive. Therefore, for most rivers, the historical OPEN ACCESS record of data is either missing or not very detailed. Available data and existing tools have Citation: Bilal A, Dai W, Larson M, Beebo QN, Xie Q much potential and may be used for qualitative prediction of future bathymetric change (2017) Qualitative simulation of bathymetric trend. This study shows that proxy approaches may be used to increase the spatiotemporal changes due to reservoir sedimentation: A resolution of flow data, and hypothesize the river cross-sections and sediment data. Sedi- Japanese case study. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0174931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174931 ment-dynamics analysis of the reach of the Tenryu River upstream of Sakuma Dam in Japan was performed to predict its future bathymetric changes using a 1D numerical model Editor: Jun Xu, Louisiana State University, UNITED STATES (HEC-RAS).
    [Show full text]