Reconstructing the Triassic Northern Barents Shelf;

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconstructing the Triassic Northern Barents Shelf; Reconstructing the Triassic northern Barents Shelf; basin infill patterns controlled by gentle sags and faults Alvar Braathen, Snorre Olaussen, Ingrid Anell, Kei Ogata, UNIS; Jan Inge Faleide, Roy Gabrielsen, Johan Petter Nystuen, UiO; William Helland-Hansen, Wojtek Nemec, UiB; Atle Mørk, NTNU; Per Terje Osmundsen, NGU/UNIS; Harmon Maher, UoN/USA; Fabrizio Storti, Fabrizio Balsamo, UoP/Italy Combining onshore and offshore observations From Svalbard towards the south and east 1) Setting: Caledonian to Devonian infra-structure 2) Setting: Carboniferous rifting before the Permian platform 3) Triassic foreland sag basins and their infill characteristics 4) Triassic extensional faulting modifying sediment routing 5) Summary Force workshop, Stavanger, 4th April 2013 Project proposal submitted to Petromaks2 the 150213: Reconstructing the Triassic northern Barents Shelf ProjectProposal group from: builds on a UNIS, UiO, UiB, NGU, NTNU, UoP/Italy, UoN/USA, Middle UU/Netherlands,series ofCanadian observations, Survey Triassic Backed by Spring Energy (Tullow Oil Norway) presented here Aims: Integrate onshore and offshore datasets to improve the understanding of basin development and tectonic activity of the northern Triassic Barents Shelf Clinoform migration across regional sag-type basins, Fluvial and shallow marine depositional systems of the Image from Google Earth, .kmz-file based migrating shelf, on Ron Blakeys palaeogeography Growth faulting in the distribution of reservoir sandstones, Interaction between shelf progradation, sag-basin development and faulting, Deep-seated zones of weakness and far-field stress configurations How did this foreland basin fill in? What controlled infill patterns? Can we establish sediment routing? Braathen et al. 2012 1) SETTING Grogan et al. 1999 Todays exposures … Late Cretaceous+Tertiary N-side up from Late Cretaceous to Oligocene events … controlling the map pattern domains Onshore study sites Eocene-Oligocene N side up => rifting W-side up W side up => rifting Tertiary fold-thrust belt • Stacked crust in f-t belt • Foredeep Open seismic grid • Forebulge • Backbulge Where are they? 1) SETTING: Paleogene and Cretaceous Paleogene transpression => transtension Extensive Cretaceous (125 Ma) intrusive tectonics during North Atlantic break-up and extrusive basaltic rocks (HALIP) N-S domain Stéphane Polteau et al. 2011 Fold-thrust E-W belt domain NE-SW domain Fault- basin inversion NGU grav.-mag. 1) SETTING: basement data linking Norway with Linking mainland with Svalbard Svalbard tectonics across the shelf Devonian basins and Current deep infrastructure: tectonics Restoration: Caledonian Caledonian nappes modified by nappes in initial position Devonian extension N-S Braathen et al. 1999 Gernigon & Brønner 2012 Devonian basement grain … infra-structural controlling later faulting Top-N, corrugation- and orogen-parallel Orogen-parallel shear zone extenion, Extension-normal basement ridges Thrust front? SCANDINAVIAN CALEDONIDES Orogen-normal/ oblique extension, Extension-parallel basement ridges SVALBARD Poorly consolidated coarse-clastic alluvial fan and fluvial S deposits, with seismic-scale sedimentary architecture N Osmundsen, Braathen & Maher, in progress Braathen et al. 2010: e Extensional shear e e e Te zone with top-N Mz kinematics, truncating syn-tectonic hanging- e e e e wall basin fill, also with younger fault activity 2) SETTING: Carboniferous rift basin, reactivating N-S Devonian fault zone Billefjorden Fault Zone reactivated as Carboniferous extensional fault Billefjorden Trough in the hanging-wall Bælum & Braathen 2012 Bergh et al. 2011 Carboniferous extensional basin Regional W-E seismic line, Isfjorden Devonian reverse faulting Carboniferous Billefjorden Trough Karst development Palaeoaplysina bioherms Av. Φ/Perm; Asselian 17.9 %/55.3 mD reefs Basin shoulder Fault-tip monoclines reefs/buildups Localized fan in evaporite complexes dominated areas Karst systems around/above intra-basin fault Braathen et al. 2011 Johannessen and Steel 1992 Detailed 3D geometries unravel basin configuration Billefjorden Trough Boundary fault domain (west) • N-S fault zone with relay structure between master faults • Major alluval fan complex building out from relay zone Alluvial fan complex in • Large basin-parallel monocline fault relay zone along fault zone; Petuniabukta syncline Geographic reconstruction of basin fill Braathen et al. 2012 Lidar scan of Billefjorden Trough sub-basin near Central-East dip-slope side basin center of half-graben Wedge-shaped sub-basin • N-S intra-basin faults and sub-basins • Filled with interfingering siliciclastic, carbonate and evaporite rocks • Fault-tip monocline and sharp- breaking extensional faults, controlled by evaporite fill Extensional fault-tip monocline, with lenticular-shaped, HW sub-basin Braathen et al. In press Seismic interpretation of Carboniferous extensional basin Applying onshore basin geometries and facies distribution models to cultivate a viable basin description well Reindalen Hydro line Tertiary detachment thrust Post-rift Late-rift thinning lenticular lenticular monocline wedging Pre-rift basement monocline Smelror et al. 2009 3) TRIASSIC N-S domain SYSTEM… E-W± domain Peak of Uralides collision orogen … N-S domain • Low relief NNE-SSW Foredeep? sed. systems domain Forebulge? • Sag basins • Local high relief sed. Faults? systems • Grabens West East Te foredeep Te forebulge? Compiled by Thickness 3-5 km Statoil Where is the Forebulge? Foredeep Heavy root? Distance > 700 km Triassic Palaeogeography .. clinoforms filling a foreland shallow sea Braathen et al. 2012 Anell et al. in prep. Riis et al., 2008 Onshore: Triassic succession showing regional basin configuration Regional shallow sag (foreland) basin with clinoforms infilling mainly from the ESE to SE Widespread upper Triassic fault-bound basins of mainly the Snadd Fm age Offshore: Riis et al. 2008 Regional sedimentary Hopen-2 system bypassing eastern foredeep basin Tying seismics to well Hopen-2, and Glørstad-Clark et al. 2011 previous studies Limited distribution seismics Triassic sags and up-warps Gardarbanken High (GH) Regional up-warping in Early Triassic (Forebulge - Deep salt - Other?) Limited distribution seismics Blocking Early-Mid Triassic clinoform migration Bypassed in Mid. Triassic Sørkapp basin (SB) Regional sag basin (back-bulge?) Thick, continuous(?) Triassic succession Limited distribution seismics Comparison of Snadd Fm channels (seismics) to Details: Sediment routing systems De Geerdalen1000 Fm channels (onshore Hopen) Correlation between Barents Sea 3D 2a (m) 100 seismics and databases … 2b … ongoing work (Helland-Hansen et al., UiB) w/t 10 w/t 100 thickness thickness 10 w/t 1000 Max Where are the sand sinks? Upper Triassic w/t 1 drainage patterns identified with seismic 1 Hopen 10 100 1000 10000 1000001000000 attributes in the Hoop Graben area Maximum width (m) Limited distribution seismics Fluvial/Distributary channels Outline of Hopen Hopen: Fluvial channel sandstone … point bar progradation Paleocurrent … partly on subseismic scale Nørdstefjellet 1000 Fining-up 2a (m) successions 100 2b w/t 10 Comparison of Snadd Fm 10 w/t 100 thickness thickness channels w/t 1000 (seismics) to 1 Max De Geerdalen 10 1000 100000 w/t 1 Fluvial channels of Hopen Fm channels Maximum width (m) Hopen (Hopen) 4) TRIASSIC FAULTING – steep, planar faults of Hopen View from the SE of the Fault-tip defined as a major monocline in shale northernmost fault on Hopen T2 T1 Fault throw T1>T2 c. 60 m U.Tr. De Geerdalen Fm Snadd Fm Dip slip normal fault o striking c. 115 Fluvial channel belt? U D c. 100 m Fault reading= 133 64 64 NOTE OBLIQUE VIEW Faulting of Klinkhammaren, Poles to bedding, Edgeøya indicating an N=22 approximately ESE-WNW rotation • Faults inferred from truncated sandstone sections axis • Domino-style block faulting above bedding-parallel detachment near top Kobbe Fm • Growth deposits seen in the upper shale section to the south. • Erosional base below the upper succession that buries the faults. • Snadd/DeGeerdalen Fm develops from a marine, thick- bedded and sandstone dominated lower succession, into variable paralic deposits in the upper half. Atle-170809 Rita-170809 SSE Alvar-170809 Heli-Lidar scanned slope Alvar 190809 Snadd/De Geerdalen Fm Tschermakfjellet Fm Kobbe/Botneheia Fm c. 200 m Onlap? Growth wedges? Snadd Fm Kobbe Fm Fault style summary: Edgeøya (Hopen) Steep, planer 50-100m faults cutting Kobbe/Botnheia Fm shale Listric faults rooting in Kobbe/Botnheia Fm shale Hopen Both fault systems with similar strike (~ E-W) Both fault systems with sedimentary growth wedges, hence active in Late Triassic time Detachment in Kobbe/ Botnheia Fm pro-delta shale Klinkhammaren Decoupled but linked deep-rooted (planar) and shallow-rooted (listric) faulting Rotated blocks No-rotation blocks Skrukkefjellet Shallow rooted Deep-rooted Orientation of Triassic fault system, as seen in onshore and offshore data Anell et al., in press. World class example of interacting Growth fault = contemporaneous faulting shallow and deep rooted fault and sedimentation, evidenced by abrupt system increase of thickness across fault …… Kvalpynten growth fault system, South Edgeøya e.g., Edwards (1976) c. 8 km DeGeerdalen Fm 8 9 11 2 3 4b 5 6 7 10 Fault blocks 1 4a Fault interactions No-rotation block => Planar ft Rotation block Rotation block => Listric fault => Listric fault next Fault block 6 7 8 Kvalpynten fault 2 characteristics c. 20 m Note rotated low-angle to bedding ”normal”
Recommended publications
  • Petroleum, Coal and Research Drilling Onshore Svalbard: a Historical Perspective
    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 3 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-3-1 Petroleum, coal and research drilling onshore Svalbard: a historical perspective Kim Senger1,2, Peter Brugmans3, Sten-Andreas Grundvåg2,4, Malte Jochmann1,5, Arvid Nøttvedt6, Snorre Olaussen1, Asbjørn Skotte7 & Aleksandra Smyrak-Sikora1,8 1Department of Arctic Geology, University Centre in Svalbard, P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 2Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration (ARCEx), University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 3The Norwegian Directorate of Mining with the Commissioner of Mines at Svalbard, P.O. Box 520, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 4Department of Geosciences, University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 5Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS, P.O. Box 613, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 6NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Fantoftvegen 38, 5072 Bergen, Norway. 7Skotte & Co. AS, Hatlevegen 1, 6240 Ørskog, Norway. 8Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway. E-mail corresponding author (Kim Senger): [email protected] The beginning of the Norwegian oil industry is often attributed to the first exploration drilling in the North Sea in 1966, the first discovery in 1967 and the discovery of the supergiant Ekofisk field in 1969. However, petroleum exploration already started onshore Svalbard in 1960 with three mapping groups from Caltex and exploration efforts by the Dutch company Bataaffse (Shell) and the Norwegian private company Norsk Polar Navigasjon AS (NPN). NPN was the first company to spud a well at Kvadehuken near Ny-Ålesund in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Inputs Govern Spatial Distribution of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcbs) and Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in an Arctic Fjord System (Isfjorden, Svalbard)*
    Environmental Pollution 281 (2021) 116963 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Terrestrial inputs govern spatial distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) in an Arctic fjord system (Isfjorden, Svalbard)* * Sverre Johansen a, b, c, Amanda Poste a, Ian Allan c, Anita Evenset d, e, Pernilla Carlsson a, a Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Tromsø, Norway b Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway c Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway d Akvaplan-niva, Tromsø, Norway e UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway article info abstract Article history: Considerable amounts of previously deposited persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are stored in the Received 20 July 2020 Arctic cryosphere. Transport of freshwater and terrestrial material to the Arctic Ocean is increasing due to Received in revised form ongoing climate change and the impact this has on POPs in marine receiving systems is unknown This 11 March 2021 study has investigated how secondary sources of POPs from land influence the occurrence and fate of Accepted 13 March 2021 POPs in an Arctic coastal marine system. Available online 17 March 2021 Passive sampling of water and sampling of riverine suspended particulate matter (SPM) and marine sediments for analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) was carried out Keywords: Particle transport in rivers and their receiving fjords in Isfjorden system in Svalbard. Riverine SPM had low contaminant < S e Terrestrial runoff concentrations ( level of detection-28 pg/g dw PCB14,16 100 pg/g dw HCB) compared to outer marine Environmental contaminants sediments 630-880 pg/g dw SPCB14,530e770 pg/g dw HCB).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cenozoic Eurekan Strain Partitioning and Decoupling in Central Spitsbergen, Svalbard
    Solid Earth, 12, 1025–1049, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-1025-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Early Cenozoic Eurekan strain partitioning and decoupling in central Spitsbergen, Svalbard Jean-Baptiste P. Koehl1,2,3,4 1Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1028 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway 2Department of Geosciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway in Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway 3Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration (ARCEx), University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway 4CAGE – Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate, 9037 Tromsø, Norway Correspondence: Jean-Baptiste P. Koehl ([email protected]) Received: 30 September 2020 – Discussion started: 19 October 2020 Revised: 22 March 2021 – Accepted: 6 April 2021 – Published: 10 May 2021 Abstract. The present study of field, petrological, explo- Group and Mimerdalen Subgroup might be preserved east ration well, and seismic data describes backward-dipping of the Billefjorden Fault Zone, suggesting that the Billefjor- duplexes comprised of phyllitic coal and bedding-parallel den Fault Zone did not accommodate reverse movement in décollements and thrusts localized along lithological tran- the Late Devonian. Hence, the thrusting of Proterozoic base- sitions in tectonically thickened Lower Devonian to lower- ment rocks over Lower Devonian sedimentary rocks along most Upper Devonian; uppermost Devonian–Mississippian; the Balliolbreen Fault and fold structures within strata of the and uppermost Pennsylvanian–lowermost Permian sedimen- Andrée Land Group and Mimerdalen Subgroup in central tary strata of the Wood Bay and/or Wijde Bay and/or Spitsbergen may be explained by a combination of down-east Grey Hoek formations; of the Billefjorden Group; and Carboniferous normal faulting with associated footwall rota- of the Wordiekammen Formation, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas in Svalbard – Securing Internationally Valuable Cultural and Natural Heritage Contents Preface
    Protected areas in Svalbard – securing internationally valuable cultural and natural heritage Contents Preface ........................................................................ 1 – Moffen Nature Reserve ......................................... 13 From no-man’s-land to a treaty and the Svalbard – Nordaust-Svalbard Nature Reserve ...................... 14 Environmental Protection Act .................................. 4 – Søraust-Svalbard Nature Reserve ......................... 16 The history of nature and cultural heritage – Forlandet National Park .........................................18 protection in Svalbard ................................................ 5 – Indre Wijdefjorden National Park ......................... 20 The purpose of the protected areas .......................... 6 – Nordenskiöld Land National Park ........................ 22 Protection values ........................................................ 7 – Nordre Isfjorden National Park ............................ 24 Nature protection areas in Svalbard ........................10 – Nordvest-Spitsbergen National Park ................... 26 – Bird sanctuaries ..................................................... 11 – Sassen-Bünsow Land National Park .................... 28 – Bjørnøya Nature Reserve ...................................... 12 – Sør-Spitsbergen National Park ..............................30 – Ossian Sars Nature Reserve ................................. 12 Svalbard in a global context ..................................... 32 – Hopen Nature Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard 2015–2016 Meld
    Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security Published by: Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security Public institutions may order additional copies from: Norwegian Government Security and Service Organisation E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.publikasjoner.dep.no KET T Meld. St. 32 (2015–2016) Report to the Storting (white paper) Telephone: + 47 222 40 000 ER RY M K Ø K J E L R I I Photo: Longyearbyen, Tommy Dahl Markussen M 0 Print: 07 PrintMedia AS 7 9 7 P 3 R 0 I 1 08/2017 – Impression 1000 N 4 TM 0 EDIA – 2 Svalbard 2015–2016 Meld. St. 32 (2015–2016) Report to the Storting (white paper) 1 Svalbard Meld. St. 32 (2015–2016) Report to the Storting (white paper) Svalbard Translation from Norwegian. For information only. Table of Contents 1 Summary ........................................ 5 6Longyearbyen .............................. 39 1.1 A predictable Svalbard policy ........ 5 6.1 Introduction .................................... 39 1.2 Contents of each chapter ............... 6 6.2 Areas for further development ..... 40 1.3 Full overview of measures ............. 8 6.2.1 Tourism: Longyearbyen and surrounding areas .......................... 41 2Background .................................. 11 6.2.2 Relocation of public-sector jobs .... 43 2.1 Introduction .................................... 11 6.2.3 Port development ........................... 44 2.2 Main policy objectives for Svalbard 11 6.2.4 Svalbard Science Centre ............... 45 2.3 Svalbard in general ........................ 12 6.2.5 Land development in Longyearbyen ................................ 46 3 Framework under international 6.2.6 Energy supply ................................ 46 law .................................................... 17 6.2.7 Water supply .................................. 47 3.1 Norwegian sovereignty .................. 17 6.3 Provision of services .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Ice Cover in Isfjorden and Hornsund, Svalbard (2000-2014) from Remote Sensing Data S
    Manuscript prepared for J. Name with version 2015/04/24 7.83 Copernicus papers of the LATEX class copernicus.cls. Date: 3 December 2015 Sea ice cover in Isfjorden and Hornsund, Svalbard (2000-2014) from remote sensing data S. Muckenhuber1, F. Nilsen2,3, A. Korosov1, and S. Sandven1 1Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NERSC), Thormøhlensgate 47, 5006 Bergen, Norway 2University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway 3Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, 5020 Bergen, Norway Correspondence to: S. Muckenhuber ([email protected]) Abstract. A satellite database including 16 555 satellite images and ice charts displaying the area of Isfjorden, Hornsund and the Svalbard region has been established with focus on the time period 2000–2014. 3319 manual interpretations of sea ice conditions have been conducted, resulting in two time series dividing the area of Isfjorden and Hornsund into “Fast ice” (sea ice attached to the coast- 5 line), “Drift ice” and “Open water”. The maximum fast ice coverage of Isfjorden is > 40 % in the periods 2000–2005 and 2009–2011 and stays < 30 % in 2006–2008 and 2012–2014. Fast ice cover in Hornsund reaches > 40 % in all considered years, except for 2012 and 2014, where the maximum stays < 20 %. The mean seasonal cycles of fast ice in Isfjorden and Hornsund show monthly aver- aged values of less than 1 % between July and November and maxima in March (Isfjorden, 35.7 %) 10 and April (Hornsund, 42.1 %) respectively. A significant reduction of the monthly averaged fast ice coverage is found when comparing the time periods 2000–2005 and 2006–2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (8.862Mb)
    Faculty of Science and Technology Department of Geosciences Structural analysis along seismic profiles trough late-Paleozoic deposits in Billefjorden and Sassenfjorden, Svalbard and their relation to the Billefjorden Fault Zone Agata Kubiak Master’s thesis in Geology, GEO-3900, November 2020 Abstract The focus of this thesis is structural analysis of the Billefjorden Fault Zone astride Billefjorden and Sassenfjorden in Spitsbergen, with the use of seismic interpretation combined/aided by geological and bathymetric maps, field observations and well data. The aim is to describe structures and the tectonic development of the study area. The focus is on large tectonic events from Devonian to Palaeogene. The Billefjorden Fault Zone was described in detail by Harland et al. (1974). Since then, many studies have been made on the fault zone, with much focus on along-strike changes and a suggested reactivation history. Most published work is based on land observations from Austfjorden to Pyramiden. Much less work has been done on the offshore domain of the fault zone. Marine seismic data from Billefjorden and Sassenfjorden were available for this thesis. In order to identify stratigraphic units in the seismic profiles, terrestrial seismics are used in combination with well data and a velocity survey from Reindalen. Furthermore, geological maps, published works and bathymetry are used for structural interpretation. The seismic data are of very poor quality. This presents a challenge in locating stratigraphic units and identifying structures. No well-tie is available in the study area. Therefore, a well in Reindalen is used. The distance from the well to the study area is problematic since only part of the stratigraphy overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Spitsbergen Nordaustlandet Polhavet Barentshavet
    5°0'0"E 10°0'0"E 15°0'0"E 20°0'0"E 25°0'0"E 30°0'0"E 35°0'0"E 81°0'0"N Polhavet Prins Oscars Land Orvin Land Vesle Tavleøya Gustav V Land Nordaustlandet Karl XII-øya Phippsøya Sjuøyane Gustav Adolf Land 80°0'0"N Martensøya Parryøya Kvitøyjøkulen Waldenøya Foynøya Nordkappsundet Kvitøya Repøyane Castrénøyane 434 433 ZorgdragerfjordenDuvefjorden Snøtoppen Nordenskiöldbukta Scoresbyøya Wrighttoppen Brennevinsfjorden 432 Laponiahalvøya Damflya Lågøya Storøya Kvitøyrenna Storøysundet Botniahalvøya Sabinebukta Orvin Land 437 Rijpfjorden Prins Lady Franklinfjorden Maudbreen Oscars Franklinsundet Worsleybreen Sverdrupisen 80°0'0"N Land Andrée Land Rijpbreen Albert I Land Norskebanken Ny-Friesland Storsteinhalvøya Olav V Land Franklinbreane James I Land Oscar II Land 401 Hinlopenrenna Haakon VII Land Gustav V Moffen Celsiusberget Murchisonfjorden Land Rijpdalen Søre Russøya Vestfonna Harald V Land Mosselhalvøya Austfonna Sorgfjorden 436 Heclahuken Gotiahalvøya Nordaustlandet Harald V Land Fuglesongen Oxfordhalvøya Breibogen Bragebreen Etonbreen IdunfjelletWahlenbergfjorden 435 Amsterdamøya Reinsdyrflya 427 Raudfjorden Balberget Hartogbukta Danskøya Vasahalvøya Smeerenburgfjorden Valhallfonna 79°0'0"N Ben Nevis 428 Woodfjorden Reuschhalvøya Palanderbukta Gustav Adolf Liefdefjorden Magdalenefjorden Åsgardfonna Albert I Glitnefonna Roosfjella Wijdefjorden Land 430 431 Hoelhalvøya Scaniahalvøya Land Bockfjorden Lomfjorden Hinlopenstretet Vibehøgdene Lomfjordhalvøya Svartstupa Monacobreen 429 Seidfjellet Svartknausflya Bråsvellbreen 402 Lomfjella Vibebukta
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Trace Elements in Arctic Soils: a Case-Study in Svalbard
    Environmental Research 159 (2017) 202–211 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envres Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace elements in MARK Arctic soils: A case-study in Svalbard ⁎ Montse Marquèsa,b, , Jordi Sierrab,c, Tatiana Drotikovad,e, Montse Maria,b, Martí Nadala, José L. Domingoa a Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Catalonia, Spain b Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Departament d′Enginyeria Quimica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain c Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain d University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), Department of Arctic Technology (AT), Longyearbyen, Norway e Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science (KBM), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: A combined assessment on the levels and distribution profiles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Svalbard (Arctic) trace elements in soils from Pyramiden (Central Spitsbergen, Svalbard Archipelago) is here reported. As pre- Soil viously stated, long-range atmospheric transport, coal deposits and previous mining extractions, as well as the Environmental pollution stack emissions of two operative power plants at this settlement are considered as potential sources of pollution. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Eight top-layer soil samples were collected and analysed for the 16 US EPA priority PAHs and for 15 trace Trace elements elements (As, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sn, Tl, V and Zn) during late summer of 2014. The highest levels of PAHs and trace elements were found in sampling sites located near two power plants, and at downwind from these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Planbeskrivelse Pyramiden
    AREALPLAN FOR PYRAMIDEN Planbeskrivelse | 16. desember 2014 Utarbeidet av LPO arkitekter for Trust Arktikugol Arealplan vedtatt 16.desember 2014 Endelig utgave for vedtak 28.november.2014 Andre gangs høring 16.mai 2014 og 20. juni 2014 Første gangs høring 18. oktober 2013 1 Innhold 1. Innledning .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Sammendrag ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Bakgrunn ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Formål med planarbeidet ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Organisering .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Planprosess .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Kunngjøring om oppstart .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Endelig planprogram ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise'billefjorden! SÅRBARHETSANALYSE!–!GUIDELINES! ! !
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cruise'Billefjorden! SÅRBARHETSANALYSE!–!GUIDELINES! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sammendrag! ! Fra!1.!januar!2015!opphørte!unntaket!for!tungoljeforbudet,!som!innebærer!at!skip!ikke!kan!bruke!eller!ha! med!tungolje!i!naturreservatene!på!østsiden!av!Svalbard!og!i!de!tre!store!nasjonalparkene!i!vest.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! De!aller!fleste!av!de!oversjøiske!cruiseskipene!står!dermed!foran!en!stor!endring!i!sine!seilingsplaner,!siden! de!ikke!lenger!har!anledning!til!å!seile!innenfor!grensene!til!disse!verneområdene!med!tungoljeombord.!! Vi!har!som!en!følge!av!dette!registrert!færre!innmeldte!skipsanløp!også!til!Longyearbyen!fra!sommeren! 2015,!med!bortfall!av!inntekter!for!det!lokale!reiselivet!som!konsekvens.!Det!er!derfor!viktig!at!vi!kommer!ut! med!informasjon!om!alternative!seilingsruter!i!Isfjorden!for!de!angjeldende!oversjøiske!cruiseskipene,!slik!at! vi!kan!beholde!også!Longyearbyen!som!en!attraktiv!cruisedestinasjon.!! Reiselivet!er!seg!bevisst!føreHvarHprinsippet!i!forvaltningen!av!Svalbard,!og!innser!at!en!slik!kanalisering!av! cruiseskip!til!Isfjorden!kan!bety!stor!miljømessig!påvirkning!på!de!stedene!skipene!velger!å!besøke!og!sette!i! land!sine!gjester.!Denne!erkjennelsen!danner!bakgrunnen!for!sårbarhetsanalysen,!som!har!tatt!for!seg!4! utvalgte!potensielt!attraktive!ilandstigningssteder!i!Billefjorden;!Brucebyen,!Pyramiden,!Skansbukta!og! Adolfbukta.!Hensikten!er!å!undersøke!områdenes!sårbarhet!når!det!gjelder!bl.a.!kulturminner,!flora!og! fauna,!og!på!bakgrunn!av!dette!finne!ut!om!det!er!tilrådelig!med!besøk,!i!hvilket!omfang,!når!på!året!og!med!
    [Show full text]
  • BRYOPHYTES, LICHENS and CYANOPROCARYOTES in SURROUNDINGS of PYRAMIDEN (SVALBARD): a CONCISE GUIDE-BOOK Pyramiden RUSSIAN ACADEMY of SCIENCES N.A
    BRYOPHYTES, LICHENS AND CYANOPROCARYOTES IN SURROUNDINGS OF PYRAMIDEN (SVALBARD): A CONCISE GUIDE-BOOK Pyramiden RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES N.A. AVRORIN POLAR-ALPINE BOTANICAL GARDEN-INSTITUTE SVALBARD ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FUND O. Belkina, N. Konstantinova, N. Korolеva, L. Konoreva, D. Davydov, A. Savchenko, A. Likhachev BRYOPHYTES, LICHENS AND CYANOPROCARYOTES IN SURROUNDINGS OF PYRAMIDEN (SVALBARD): A CONCISE GUIDE-BOOK 2015 UDC 581.526.533(481-922.1) + 582.29(481-922.1) + 582.33:581.9 (481-922.1) ISBN O. Belkina, N. Konstantinova, N. Korolеva, L. Konoreva, D. Davydov, A. Savchenko, A. Likhachev. Bryophytes, lichens and cyanoprocaryotes in surroundings of Pyramiden (Svalbard): a concise guide-book. 2015. p. 254 This book presents some widespread and rare species of mosses, liverworts, lichens and cyanoprokaryotes in the surroundings of Pyramiden town on Svalbard archipelago, together with brief explanations of morphology, ecology and distribution of selected species. Five excursion routes in and around Pyramiden show the diversity of cryptogamic organisms and their habitats. The book contains more than 200 full-colored photographs and five maps of the excursion routes. To all who are interested in Arctic wildlife. Fig. - 325, bibliogr. –33 Editors: Dr. Sci (Biology) Michael Dodd, Dr. Sci (Biology) Irina Tatarenko, Dr. Sci (Biology) Natalia Koroleva Reviewers: Dr. Sci (Biology) Layout: A. Savchenko The book was published due to financial support of Environmental Protection Fund of Svalbard, № 13\12 © O. Belkina, N. Konstantinova, N. Korolеva, L. Konoreva, D. Davydov, A. Savchenko, A. Likhachev © Photo: D.А. Davydov, O.A. Belkina, N.A. Konstantinova, L. A. Konoreva, N.E. Korolеva, A.N. Savchenko © The Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden and Institute by N.
    [Show full text]