DOCSLIB.ORG

Cranial Shape in Asian Homo Erectus: Geographic, Anagenetic, and Size-Related Variation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cranial Shape in Asian Homo Erectus: Geographic, Anagenetic, and Size-Related Variation Chapter 6 Cranial Shape in Asian Homo erectus: Geographic, Anagenetic, and Size-Related Variation Karen L. Baab Abstract A strong focus on the morphological differences Introduction between African and Asian H. erectus has generally overshadowed variation among populations of Asian Despite the implicit assumption of broad homogeneity H. erectus. This study explored variation in Asian H. erectus within Asian H. erectus, there is variation in the cranial using 3D geometric morphometric methods, examining morphology of the Javanese and Chinese H. erectus sam- the shape of the neurocranium, frontal bone, occipital ples. This diversity has implications for the interpretation of bone and temporal base. Analyses focused on the elucida- tion of geographic, temporal and size-related patterns of the taxonomy and evolutionary history of H. erectus. cranial shape variation in a representative sample from Although H. erectus s.l. is now known from sites across the Zhoukoudian, Sangiran, Ngandong, Sambungmacan and Old World, the initial H. erectus discoveries were from sites Ngawi. In regards to the neurocranium, geographic dif- on the Indonesian island of Java (Trinil; Dubois 1894), and ferences explained the greatest proportion of variation, from mainland China (Zhoukoudian; Black 1929). A pre- followed by geochronological age (these two factors occupation with the distinctions between African and Asian explained similar shape differences within the neurocra- H. erectus has generally overshadowed potential variation nium) and size. The temporal base, frontal and occipital within Asian H. erectus (e.g., Wood 1984, 1994; Andrews bones were strongly influenced by geography and size. 1984; Stringer 1984; Villmoare 2005). Yet, those studies Although the later Javanese and Zhoukoudian specimens that have explored differences within and among Asian were generally distinct, there was some overlap between H. erectus fossil assemblages have uncovered complex and Sangiran 2 and the northern Chinese specimens. This sometimes conflicting patterns of geographic, temporal, may suggest that isolation between the two regions did and size-related cranial variation (von Koenigswald and not occur until the Middle or Late Pleistocene or that Weidenreich 1939; Weidenreich 1943, 1951; Jacob 1975, the Sangiran hominins are morphologically close to the 1978; Sartono 1975; Rightmire 1990; Kidder and Durband common ancestor of the Zhoukoudian and later Javanese 2000, 2004; Antón 2002; Durband et al. 2005; Kaifu et al. H. erectus. The late Indonesian fossils did group together 2005, 2008; Liu et al. 2005; Baab 2007). in the principal components analyses. Yet there were subtle Some researchers have reported a robust relationship shape differences between the Sambungmacan/Ngawi fos- between morphology and geography within Asian H. erectus. sils and those from Ngandong, indicating the presence of These studies show that the Javanese and northern Chinese two similar but slightly different potentially contemporane- samples are each relatively homogenous but clearly distinct ous morphs. The Sambungmacan specimens do not appear from one another in regards to their cranial shape (Weidenreich to be morphological intermediaries between the Sangiran 1951; Picq 1990; Kidder and Durband 2000, 2004; Antón and Ngandong fossils in regards to overall cranial shape. 2002; Durband et al. 2005), despite the greater time depth of the Indonesian fossil sample. Differences have been docu- Keywords Shape variation • 3D geometric morphometrics mented in the overall shape of the cranial vault, including the • China • Indonesia • Middle Pleistocene frontal bone, occipital bone, and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). In contrast, other studies have documented greater overlap between the Indonesian and Chinese morphologies (Rightmire 1990; Bilsborough 2000; Liu et al. 2005). Cranial shape may have changed over time both within K.L. Baab (*) Asian H. erectus as a whole as well as within regional sam- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA ples (e.g., Antón 2002). It has been well-established that the e-mail: [email protected] average brain size increased over time in H. erectus s.l. C.J. Norton and D.R. Braun (eds.), Asian Paleoanthropology: From Africa to China and Beyond, Vertebrate Paleobiology 57 and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9094-2_6, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 58 K.L. Baab (Wolpoff 1984; Leigh 1992; Rightmire 2004) and within workers were implicitly supporting the presence of two or Asian H. erectus s.s. in particular (Sartono 1975; Antón and more separate lineages within Javanese H. erectus for over 1 Swisher 2001). However, it is unclear exactly how this relates Myr. Jacob (1978) extended this lineage back in time even to changes in cranial shape within this taxon, although Antón further to >1.5 Ma by arguing for an ancestor–descendent (2002) has speculated that an increase in cranial height and relationship between “Pithecanthropus modjokertensis” minimum frontal breadth were the result of increasing (which includes S 4) and “P. soloensis” (Ngandong, Sm 1, endocranial volume in the Javanese H. erectus. Santa Luca and S 17). (1980) identified several evolutionary trends in the shape of This study complements previous efforts to better char- the cranium within Asian H. erectus which he also attributed acterize and understand the degree and pattern of variation to an increase in brain size. These changes include an increase within Asian H. erectus based on linear measurements and in the breadth across the temporal squamae, a decrease in the discrete characters by focusing on an alternate source of size of the sagittal keel, a reduction of the supraorbital sulcus information: three dimensional (3D) cranial shape. Three and a more vertically oriented occipital plane. More recently, dimensional geometric morphometrics has advantages over Kaifu et al. (2008) suggested that increases in external cra- standard linear measurements in that it retains the original nial dimensions in the more recent Indonesian fossils corre- geometry of the specimens and can be used to visualize spond to increases in endocranial capacity. shape differences related to external factors such as geogra- Differences within the sites of Sangiran, Ngandong, and phy or size. Although discrete traits have proven central to Zhoukoudian have also been attributed to sexual variation the debate about the distinctiveness of Asian vs. African (e.g., Weidenreich 1943; Santa Luca 1980; Rightmire 1990; H. erectus, they have also proven quite controversial. For Wolpoff 1999). Interpretations of sexual variation must be instance, disagreements concerning individual character viewed cautiously, however, due to well-documented diffi- definitions, independence of characters, and taxonomic culties in assigning sex to individual fossils (Armelagos and distribution of characters remain unsettled (e.g., Stringer Van Gerven 1980). To avoid the risks associated with assign- 1984; Andrews 1984; Wood 1984, 1991, 1994; Hublin 1986; ing sex to the fossils, this study focused on size-related vari- Bräuer 1990; Kennedy 1991; Bräuer and Mbua 1992; ation; within Asian H. erectus, and within limited Villmoare 2005). Cranial shape, as quantified by geometric temporogeographic samples (such as Ngandong), this prob- morphometric techniques, provides a less subjective source ably corresponds to sexual variation. However, size varia- of information about cranial morphology and allows for the tion outside of these circumscribed samples must be viewed study of the shape of biological structures, rather than just a as a combination of sexual and allometric variation. Recent limited set of linear measurements. In this study the rela- work has highlighted the effect of size on certain aspects of tionship between cranial shape variation and several exter- cranial shape often used to defineH. erectus, such as occipi- nal variables, specifically geography, geological age and tal angulation and degree of postorbital constriction (Spoor cranial size, was explored using principal components and et al. 2005). multiple regression analyses. In addition, the affinities of In addition to questions which apply to the Asian H. erectus individual specimens within the Javanese sample and pos- sample as a whole, there are also areas of ambiguity related sible evolutionary relationships were also assessed using specifically to the Javanese H. erectus sample. For example, this dataset. it is unclear whether the Sambungmacan fossils form a sin- gle, homogenous sample and, if so, whether they are a good morphological intermediary between the Sangiran and Ngandong samples (Frayer et al. 1993; Wolpoff 1999; Baba Materials et al. 2003; Kaifu et al. 2008), or whether they are more closely related to the Ngandong specimens (Sartono 1975; In this study 3D landmark data were acquired from Indonesian Jacob 1975, 1978; Delson et al. 2001; Antón 2002). The less and Chinese H. erectus cranial fossils. Original specimens widely-known Ngawi specimen has also been grouped with were used when available, but casts were substituted for the the Ngandong and Sambungmacan fossils, although only Zhoukoudian, S 12, S 17 and Ngawi fossils (Table 6.1). limited morphometric comparisons have been made between Although data was collected from the well-preserved Perning Ngawi and other Indonesian H. erectus (Sartono 1990; fossil calvaria, it was not included in any analysis as a result Widianto and Zeitoun
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Craniofacial Morphology of Homo Floresiensis: Description, Taxonomic
    Journal of Human Evolution 61 (2011) 644e682 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: Description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication Yousuke Kaifu a,b,*, Hisao Baba a, Thomas Sutikna c, Michael J. Morwood d, Daisuke Kubo b, E. Wahyu Saptomo c, Jatmiko c, Rokhus Due Awe c, Tony Djubiantono c a Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki Prefecture Japan b Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan c National Research and Development Centre for Archaeology, Jl. Raya Condet Pejaten No 4, Jakarta 12001, Indonesia d Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia article info abstract Article history: This paper describes in detail the external morphology of LB1/1, the nearly complete and only known Received 5 October 2010 cranium of Homo floresiensis. Comparisons were made with a large sample of early groups of the genus Accepted 21 August 2011 Homo to assess primitive, derived, and unique craniofacial traits of LB1 and discuss its evolution. Prin- cipal cranial shape differences between H. floresiensis and Homo sapiens are also explored metrically. Keywords: The LB1 specimen exhibits a marked reductive trend in its facial skeleton, which is comparable to the LB1/1 H. sapiens condition and is probably associated with reduced masticatory stresses. However, LB1 is Homo erectus craniometrically different from H. sapiens showing an extremely small overall cranial size, and the Homo habilis Cranium combination of a primitive low and anteriorly narrow vault shape, a relatively prognathic face, a rounded Face oval foramen that is greatly separated anteriorly from the carotid canal/jugular foramen, and a unique, tall orbital shape.
    [Show full text]
  • From Left to Right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. Van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert Van Heekeren 1902-1974
    From left to right, R. P. Soejono, H. R. van Heekeren, and W. G. Solheim II Hendrik Robert van Heekeren 1902-1974 Received 29 September 1975 R. P. SOEJONO The friendly spirit and cooperation I found from scientists as well as from the simple peoples in small villages all over Indonesia will stay with me forever. (van Heekeren's Ceremonial Lecture Dr. H. C., University of Indonesia, 1970) R. H. R. van Heekeren passed away in Heemstede on 10 September 1974 after a four month's illness. His attendance at the "Symposium on Modern D Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia," which was held on 16 May 1974 in Groningen, was the last activity of his lifetime in the field of science. The paper he gave during this symposium dealt with problems ofthe chronology of Indonesian prehistory, which he always considered as being in its formative stage, with research on this subject continuously intensifying. His work of writing the second edition of his book The Bronze-Iron Age of Indonesia (first published in 1958), being done in cooperation with R. P. Soejono at the N.LA.S. (The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar), has not yet been accomplished, in spite of his earnest desire to have the new edition published as quickly as possible. He fell ill upon his return from Groningen, making it impossible for him to continue his writing at the N.LA.S., and this illness ended with his death. It was not expected that he would pass away so soon and so suddenly, as a few days before his death he seemed to be improving and was looking forward to his next visit, the following year, to Indonesia, which he had always considered as his second homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Homo Floresiensis and Its Relation to Evolutionary Processes Under Isolation G.A
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE Vol. advpub No. 0, 000–000, 2008 The origin of Homo floresiensis and its relation to evolutionary processes under isolation G.A. LYRAS1, M.D. DERMITZAKIS1, A.A.E. Van der GEER1, S.B. Van der GEER2, J. De VOS3* 1Museum of Paleontology and Geology, Faculty of Geology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 15784, Greece 2Pulsar Physics, Eindhoven 5614 BD, the Netherlands 3National Museum of Natural History Naturalis, Leiden 2300 RA, the Netherlands Received 11 April 2008; accepted 20 May 2008 Abstract Since its first description in 2004, Homo floresiensis has been attributed to a species of its own, a descendant of H. erectus or another early hominid, a pathological form of H. sapiens, or a dwarfed H. sapiens related to the Neolithic inhabitants of Flores. In this contribution, we apply a geo- metric morphometric analysis to the skull of H. floresiensis (LB1) and compare it with skulls of normal H. sapiens, insular H. sapiens (Minatogawa Man and Neolithic skulls from Flores), pathological H. sa- piens (microcephalics), Asian H. erectus (Sangiran 17), H. habilis (KNM ER 1813), and Australop- ithecus africanus (Sts 5). Our analysis includes specimens that were highlighted by other authors to prove their conclusions. The geometric morphometric analysis separates H. floresiensis from all H. sa- piens, including the pathological and insular forms. It is not possible to separate H. floresiensis from H. erectus. Australopithecus falls separately from all other skulls. The Neolithic skulls from Flores fall within the range of modern humans and are not related to LB1. The microcephalic skulls fall within the range of modern humans, as well as the skulls of the Neolithic small people of Flores.
    [Show full text]
  • The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration
    guo namuuiy B/121188 The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration General Editor Immanuel Ness Volume V Rem-Z )WILEY~BLACKWELL A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication Contents Volume I Contents to Volume I: Prehistory IX Lexicon xiii Notes on Contributors xlvii Introduction cxxvi Acknowledgments cxxxii Abbreviations cxxxv Maps cxxxvii Prehistory Part I: The Peopling of the World during the Pleistocene 7 Part II: Holocene migrations 11 Volume II Global Human Migration A—Cro 417-1122 Volume III Global Human Migration Cru-Ind 1123-1810 Volume IV Global Human Migration Ind-Rem 1811-2550 Volume V Global Human Migration Rem-Z 2551-3180 Index to Volume I: Prehistory 3181 Index to Volumes II-V 3197 3182 INDEX TO VOLUME I: PREHISTORY Anatolia (confd) Arawak culture, 379-80, 394, 397 Ice Age land bridge, 327 Mesolithic, 143^4 language, 87, 89, 93, 384, 385, language families, 87, 328 migrations into Europe, 141—4 386-7, 392, 396-7 linguistic history, 327-32 see also Anatolia Hypothesis origin, 379 lithic technologies, 44-5, 58 Neolithic culture, 139-40, 141, society, 397 megafauna, 56—7 142, 143-4 speakers, 376, 378, 379-80 migrations within, 57 pottery, 143 spread, 380, 386-7, 398 modern populations, 254 see also Turkey archaeological evidence, 32, 293 Northern Territories, 330 Anatolia Hypothesis, 92, 161, 163, cultural changes, 40-6, 108-9 Pleistocene, 327 169,170-1 paucity, 14, 104, 112 Western Desert, 330 Ancient Egypt and radiocarbon dating see see also Tasmania archaeological sites, 135—6, under radiocarbon dating Australo-Melanesians, 220
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Prehistoric Research in Indonesia to 1950
    The History of Prehistoric Research in Indonesia to 1950 Received 16 January 1968 R. P. SOE]ONO INTRODUCTION HE oldest description of material valuable for prehistoric recording in future times was given by G. E. Rumphius at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Rum­ T phius mentioned the veneration of historical objects by local peoples, and even now survivals of the very remote past retain their respect. On several islands we also notice a continuation of prehistoric traditions and art. Specific prehistoric relics, like many other archaeological remains, are holy to most of the inhabitants because of their quaint, uncommon shapes. As a result, myths are frequently created around these objects. An investigator is not permitted to inspect the bronze kettle­ drum kept in a temple at Pedjeng (Bali) and he must respect the people's devout feelings when he attempts to observe megalithic relics in the Pasemah Plateau (South Sumatra); these facts accentuate the persistence oflocal veneration even today. In spite of the veneration of particular objects, which in turn favors their preservation, many other relics have been lost or destroyed through digging or looting by treasure hunters or other exploiters seeking economic gain. Moreover, unqualified excavators have com­ pounded the problem. P. V. van Stein Callenfels, originally a specialist in Hindu-Indonesian archaeology, be­ came strongly aware of neglect in the field of prehistoric archaeology, and he took steps to begin systematic research. During his visit to kitchen middens in East Sumatra during a tour of inspection in 1920 for the Archaeological Service, he met with the digging of shell heaps for shell for limekilns.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asian and Australian Paleoanthropology: a Review of the Last Century
    JASs Invited Reviews Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 87 (2009), pp. 7-31 Southeast Asian and Australian paleoanthropology: a review of the last century Arthur C. Durband Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University, MS 41012 Holden Hall 158, Lubbock, TX 79409-1012, USA e-mail: [email protected] Summary - A large and diverse body of scholarship has been developed around the fossil evidence discovered in Southeast Asia and Australia. However, despite its importance to many diff erent aspects of paleoanthropological research, Australasia has often received signifi cantly less attention than it deserves. is review will focus primarily on the evidence for the origins of modern humans from this region. Workers like Franz Weidenreich identifi ed characteristics in the earliest inhabitants of Java that bore some resemblance to features found in modern indigenous Australians. More recent work by numerous scholars have built upon those initial observations, and have contributed to the perception that the fossil record of Australasia provides one of the better examples of regional continuity in the human fossil record. Other scholars disagree, instead fi nding evidence for discontinuity between these earliest Indonesians and modern Australian groups. ese authorities cite support for an alternative hypothesis of extinction of the ancient Javan populations and their subsequent replacement by more recently arrived groups of modern humans. Presently, the bulk of the evidence supports this latter model. A dearth of credible regional characteristics linking the Pleistocene fossils from Java to early Australians, combined with a series of features indicating discontinuity between those same groups, indicate that the populations represented by the fossils from Sangiran and Ngandong went extinct without contributing genes to modern Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Floresiensis
    Homo floresiensis CHARLES J. VELLA 2016 CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE DOCENTS GROUP DOWNLOADABLE AT WEBSITE: WWW.CHARLESJVELLAPHD.COM THANKS: L. AIELLO, D. FALK, G. HURLEY Every once in a while, there comes to light a fossil that shakes the foundation of paleoanthropology to its very core and forces us to reconsider what we thought we knew about human evolution. —Donald C. Johanson, Lucy’s Legacy This applies to Homo floresiensis Flores legend of Ebu Gogo There were legends about the existence of little people on the island of Flores, Indonesia. They were called the Ebu Gogo. The islanders describe Ebu Gogo as being about one meter tall, hairy and prone to "murmuring" to each other in some form of language. Discovery 2003 Homo floresiensis, (“the hobbit,”) found in a late Pleistocene context at the cave of Liang Bua by Michael Morwood’s group 2003: Associated with a core and flake assemblage that extended back to ca 95 ka LB1 originally dated to 38 to 13 ka; Lived there from 74 to 17 ka according to original conclusions. An arm bone provisionally assigned to H. floresiensis is about 74,000 years old 2016: new geological assessment places H. floresiensis between 100,000 and 60,000 years old. Measurements of the decay of radioactive elements in an arm bone from the partial skeleton indicate that the find dates to between 86,900 and 71,500 years ago. Until now, researchers suspected these bones were only about 18,000 years old. Later excavations that have dated more rock and sediment around the remains now suggest that hobbits were gone from the cave by 50,000 years ago, according to a study published in Nature on 30 March 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
    World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site.
    [Show full text]
  • Java Man and the Politics of Natural History an Object Biography
    Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 177 (2021) 290–311 bki brill.com/bki Java Man and the Politics of Natural History An Object Biography Caroline Drieënhuizen | orcid: 0000-0002-5719-2328 Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, the Netherlands [email protected] Fenneke Sysling | orcid: 0000-0001-8097-1568 Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract Natural history museums have long escaped postcolonial or decolonial scrutiny; their specimens were and are usually presented as part of the natural world, containing only biological or geological information. However, their collections, like those of other museums, are rooted in colonial practices and thinking. In this article, we sketch a polit- ical and decolonial biography of ‘Java Man’, the fossilized remains of a Homo erectus specimen, housed in Naturalis, the Natural History Museum, in the Netherlands. We describe the context of Dutch colonialism and the role of indigenous knowledge and activity in the discovery of Java Man.We also follow Java Man to the Netherlands, where it became a contested specimen and part of a discussion about repatriation. This art- icle argues that the fossils of Java Man and their meanings are products of ‘creolized’ knowledge systems produced by Empire and sites of competing national and discip- linary histories and identities. Keywords natural history museums – Java Man – repatriation – object biography © caroline drieënhuizen and fenneke sysling, 2021 | doi:10.1163/22134379-bja10012 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the cc by-ncDownloaded4.0 license. from Brill.com09/29/2021 05:34:48PM via free access java man and the politics of natural history 291 1 Introduction Natural history museums have long escaped postcolonial or decolonial scrutiny and are only now somewhat hesitantly joining the conversation about the role of non-Western objects in Western museums that has hitherto focused on eth- nological and art museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asian and Australian Paleoanthropology: a Review of the Last Century
    JASs Invited Reviews Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 87 (2009), pp. 1-xxx Southeast Asian and Australian paleoanthropology: A review of the last century Arthur C. Durband Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University, MS 41012 Holden Hall 158, Lubbock, TX 79409-1012, USA e-mail: [email protected] Summary - A large and diverse body of scholarship has been developed around the fossil evidence discovered in Southeast Asia and Australia. However, despite its importance to many diff erent aspects of paleoanthropological research, Australasia has often received signifi cantly less attention than it deserves. is review will focus primarily on the evidence for the origins of modern humans from this region. Workers like Franz Weidenreich identifi ed characteristics in the earliest inhabitants of Java that bore some resemblance to features found in modern indigenous Australians. More recent work by numerous scholars have built upon those initial observations, and have contributed to the perception that the fossil record of Australasia provides one of the better examples of regional continuity in the human fossil record. Other scholars disagree, instead fi nding evidence for discontinuity between these earliest Indonesians and modern Australian groups. ese authorities cite support for an alternative hypothesis of extinction of the ancient Javan populations and their subsequent replacement by more recently arrived groups of modern humans. Presently, the bulk of the evidence supports this latter model. A dearth of credible regional characteristics linking the Pleistocene fossils from Java to early Australians, combined with a series of features indicating discontinuity between those same groups, indicate that the populations represented by the fossils from Sangiran and Ngandong went extinct without contributing genes to modern Australians.
    [Show full text]
  • Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2010
    PERATURAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN JANGKA MENENGAH NASIONAL TAHUN 2010 - 2014 DENGAN RAHMAT TUHAN YANG MAHA ESA PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, Menimbang : bahwa untuk melaksanakan ketentuan Pasal 19 ayat (1) Undang- Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, dipandang perlu menetapkan Peraturan Presiden tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2010 - 2014; Mengingat : 1. Pasal 4 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; 2. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 47, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4286); 3. Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 104, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4421); 4. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2007 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional 2005 – 2025 (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 33, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4700); MEMUTUSKAN : Menetapkan : PERATURAN PRESIDEN TENTANG RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN JANGKA MENENGAH NASIONAL TAHUN 2010 - 2014. Pasal 1 Dalam Peraturan Presiden ini, yang dimaksud dengan: 1. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2010 -2014, yang selanjutnya disebut RPJM Nasional, adalah dokumen perencanaan pembangunan nasional untuk periode 5 (lima) tahun terhitung sejak tahun 2010 sampai dengan tahun 2014. - 2 - 2. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Kementerian/ Lembaga Tahun 2010 - 2014, yang selanjutnya disebut Rencana Strategis Kementerian/Lembaga, adalah dokumen perencanaan Kementerian/Lembaga untuk periode 5 (lima) tahun terhitung sejak tahun 2010 sampai dengan tahun 2014. 3. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah, yang selanjutnya disebut RPJM Daerah, adalah dokumen perencanaan pembangunan daerah untuk periode 5 (lima) tahun sesuai periode masing-masing pemerintah daerah.
    [Show full text]