The Specter of Rome in Montesquieu's the Spirit Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Specter of Rome in Montesquieu's the Spirit Of THE SPECTER OF ROME IN MONTESQUIEU’S THE SPIRIT OF THE LAWS ZACHARY SHUFRO – SENIOR HONORS THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Vickie Sullivan, for her guidance and infinite knowledge of Montesquieu, without which I would never have been able to write this work; Professor Dennis Rasmussen, for his encouragement, advice, and candor in his revisions; my grandmother, Lydie Shufro, for fielding my questions on French history, grammar, and anything else that crossed my mind; and my friends, for tolerating my astronomical levels of stress as deadlines approached. I could not have completed this work without your aid and constant support. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 PART I: FRANCE ............................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER I: MONTESQUIEU’S ANALYSIS OF FRENCH LAW ............................................... 9 CHAPTER II: THE INFLUENCE OF ROMAN LAW IN FRANCE............................................. 22 CHAPTER III: THE ORIGINS OF THE FRENCH – THE GRAND DEBATE .............................. 32 CHAPTER IV: THE REVOLUTION OF THE LAWS .............................................................. 47 CONCLUSION TO PART I ................................................................................................. 60 PART II: ENGLAND ..................................................................................................... 62 CHAPTER V: MONTESQUIEU’S ANALYSIS OF ENGLAND ................................................. 65 CHAPTER VI: THE INFLUENCE OF ROMAN LAW IN ENGLAND ........................................ 89 CHAPTER VII: THE ORIGINS OF ENGLISH LAW .............................................................. 98 CHAPTER VIII: THE BARRIERS OF THE COMMON LAW ................................................ 111 CONCLUSION TO PART II .............................................................................................. 122 PART III – SYNTHESIS.............................................................................................. 124 CHAPTER IX: THE COMMON ROOTS OF THE LAW ........................................................ 127 CHAPTER X: THE DIVERGENCE OF THE LAW ............................................................... 135 CHAPTER XI: DEVIATING POLITICS ............................................................................. 144 CHAPTER XII: CONSEQUENCES .................................................................................... 155 CONCLUSION TO PART III ............................................................................................ 162 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 164 WORKS CITED............................................................................................................ 169 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 177 2 INTRODUCTION Few in modern history have had as profound an impact on the world as Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu. In his magnum opus, The Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu undertook to examine the very roots of human existence, and to uncover the spirit of liberty through an examination of the world as it is and the laws as he saw them. He explains: “I began by examining men, and I believe that, amidst the infinite diversity of laws and mores, they were not led by their fancies alone” (Preface, xliii). Being thus resolved, Montesquieu laid down the principles of all governments and laws as he saw fit, explaining their histories and mores through a keen analysis of their laws. Over the course of this examination, Montesquieu observed in England a principle which has shaped every democratic constitution of the modern era: the theory of the separation of powers. But beyond this important principle, Montesquieu had much more to impart to the reader. Throughout his discussion of the laws of various nations, Montesquieu devotes considerable attention to the laws of France and of England; he furthermore implies that the spirit of Roman laws casts a shadow over these nations’ legal codes. This thesis seeks to examine the specter of Rome in these two nations, in order to understand Montesquieu’s analysis of the following three questions: First, how did the adoption of Roman law affect the development of a strong and central illiberal government in France? To fully elucidate the implications of Montesquieu’s analysis, it will be necessary not only to examine his analysis, but to cast an eye to the history of the nation as a whole. We will determine the extent to which there existed prior legal codes in France, and their exact nature; once their spirit has been ascertained, we will examine exactly how they have 3 changed over time, and seek to understand why. The political implications of these changes will then allow a fuller understanding of the nature of politics in France. Second, why did England not adopt Roman law? The English legal and political system must be examined, both in Montesquieu’s analysis and from a historical perspective. It is necessary to establish exactly what the legal code is in England, as well as its origins. From that point of departure, it can be established whether or not Roman law ever influenced its development. Ultimately, a full understanding of why the English legal code developed in the way it did, when, and why, will allow us to understand how England above all other states “has political liberty for its direct purpose” (XI.5, 156). Once the answers to the two above questions have been fully determined, we can approach the third: what role did the divergence of the legal codes of France and England play in Montesquieu’s analysis of absolutism and political liberty? * * * * * Montesquieu published The Spirit of the Laws in 1748; in the Preface, he refers to this, his lasting contribution to modern politics, as “the work of twenty years” (Preface, xliii). The examination of his analysis must be couched in an understanding of the era in which he wrote. Louis XIV, the roi soleil and the great consolidator of the absolute French monarchy, died in 1715; under his great-grandson, Louis XV, France slowly started to revert to a state run by nobility in their domains and of the king at Versailles, albeit with only a margin of their former power in each case. Scandals rocked the era: the French were resoundingly defeated in the War of the Spanish Succession at the 1704 Battle of Blenheim, and the king kept company with a known prostitute, whom he had ennobled through marriage to the title of Madame du Barry, and the age of the 4 Enlightenment marked a reversal of all known modes and orders of the previous centuries; change happened in Europe at a scale unknown since the Reformation. The French Catholic Church, for almost a century a formidable political influence under the regencies of the Cardinals Mazarin and de Richelieu, was slowly losing its monopoly on power, as deistic understandings of the world, prompted by scientific advancement, began to take the world by storm. Natural right theory, promoting the individual rather than the state, was rearing its head, and belief in a scientific analysis of the natural world flourished. In England, a young German couple ruled as king and queen; first Sir Robert Walpole, then the Earl of Wilmington, guided policy by creating the de facto position of Prime Minister. Change was in the air, on both political and societal fronts; Montesquieu’s work is considered by some to have contributed to, or even to have sparked, some of this change. By presenting a full analysis of the English and French governments in that era, as well as historically, Montesquieu exposes the most fundamental traits of these regimes, for better or for worse; his keen observations will provide a further understanding of the political and social values, norms, and mores of this turbulent era. Ultimately, this thesis seeks to examine the roots of absolutism in early modern politics, guided by Montesquieu’s implicit theories on the influence of Roman law. A careful examination of his analysis of France and of England will provide a lens through which to scrutinize Montesquieu’s understanding of political liberty. Through a careful consideration of Montesquieu’s opus, the legal codes upon which the British common law system was established, one can shed light on the development and state of French jurisprudence in his era and the legal history of Western civilization, as well as on Montesquieu’s implications regarding what we understand to be political liberty, and why we consider that the paramount goal of modern government. With that in mind, we now turn to Part I – Montesquieu’s analysis of France. 5 PART I: FRANCE 6 PART I: FRANCE It should hardly be surprising that a French author would look to his country when writing a treatise on government. Even less surprising would be that such an author, especially a baron and judge of the Enlightenment era, would seek to understand the origins of his own nation’s form of government. Montesquieu makes reference to France and to the French throughout his work, both obliquely through discussion of ‘our laws’ or through the use of a national ‘we’ [fr: nous] when discussing moral, legal, and social customs, and with his extensive analysis of
Recommended publications
  • Duelling and Militarism Author(S): A
    Duelling and Militarism Author(s): A. Forbes Sieveking Source: Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Vol. 11 (1917), pp. 165-184 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Historical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3678440 Accessed: 26-06-2016 04:11 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press, Royal Historical Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the Royal Historical Society This content downloaded from 128.192.114.19 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 04:11:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms DUELLING AND MILITARISM By A. FORBES SIEVEKING, F.S.A., F.R.Hist. Soc. Read January 18, 1917 IT is not the object of this paper to suggest that there is any historical foundation for the association of a social or even a national practice of duelling with the more recent political manifestation, which is usually defined according to our individual political beliefs ; far less is it my intention to express any opinion of my own on the advantages or evils of a resort to arms as a means of settling the differences that arise between individuals or nations.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Civil Code
    TUE A ERICANI LAW REGISTER FOUNDED 1852. UNIERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPART=ENT OF LAW VOL. {4 0 - S'I DECEMBER, 1902. No. 12. THE GERMAN CIVIL CODE. (Das Biirgerliche Gesetzbuch.) SOURCES-PREPARATION-ADOPTION. The magnitude of an attempt to codify the German civil. laws can be adequately appreciated only by remembering that for more than fifteefn centuries central Europe was the world's arena for startling political changes radically involv- ing territorial boundaries and of necessity affecting private as well as public law. With no thought of presenting new data, but that the reader may properly marshall events for an accurate compre- hension of the irregular development of the law into the modem and concrete results, it is necessary to call attention to some of the political- and social factors which have been potent and conspicuous since the eighth century. Notwithstanding the boast of Charles the Great that he was both master of Europe and the chosen pr6pagandist of Christianity and despite his efforts in urging general accept- ance of the Roman law, which the Latinized Celts of the western and southern parts of his titular domain had orig- THE GERM AN CIVIL CODE. inally been forced to receive and later had willingly retained, upon none of those three points did the facts sustain his van- ity. He was constrained to recognize that beyond the Rhine there were great tribes, anciently nomadic, but for some cen- turies become agricultural when not engaged in their normal and chief occupation, war, who were by no means under his control. His missii or special commissioners to those people were not well received and his laws were not much respected.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation
    University of Groningen The growth of an Austrasian identity Stegeman, Hans IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Stegeman, H. (2014). The growth of an Austrasian identity: Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 The growth of an Austrasian identity Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de rector magnificus dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial by Battle*
    Trial by Battle Peter T. Leesony Abstract For over a century England’s judicial system decided land disputes by ordering disputants’legal representatives to bludgeon one another before an arena of spectating citizens. The victor won the property right for his principal. The vanquished lost his cause and, if he were unlucky, his life. People called these combats trials by battle. This paper investigates the law and economics of trial by battle. In a feudal world where high transaction costs confounded the Coase theorem, I argue that trial by battle allocated disputed property rights e¢ ciently. It did this by allocating contested property to the higher bidder in an all-pay auction. Trial by battle’s “auctions” permitted rent seeking. But they encouraged less rent seeking than the obvious alternative: a …rst- price ascending-bid auction. I thank Gary Becker, Omri Ben-Shahar, Peter Boettke, Chris Coyne, Ariella Elema, Lee Fennell, Tom Ginsburg, Mark Koyama, William Landes, Anup Malani, Jonathan Masur, Eric Posner, George Souri, participants in the University of Chicago and Northwestern University’s Judicial Behavior Workshop, the editors, two anonymous reviewers, and especially Richard Posner and Jesse Shapiro for helpful suggestions and conversation. I also thank the Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory at the University of Chicago, where I conducted this research, and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. yEmail: [email protected]. Address: George Mason University, Department of Economics, MS 3G4, Fairfax, VA 22030. 1 “When man is emerging from barbarism, the struggle between the rising powers of reason and the waning forces of credulity, prejudice, and custom, is full of instruction.” — Henry C.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty
    Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Author: Rebecca Clark Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:103616 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Department of Political Science MONTESQUIEU ON THE HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF POLITICAL LIBERTY A dissertation by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 © Copyright by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK 2012 Abstract Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Rebecca R. Clark Dissertation Advisor: Christopher Kelly Montesquieu famously presents climate and terrain as enabling servitude in hot, fertile climes and on the exposed steppes of central Asia. He also traces England’s exemplary constitution, with its balanced constitution, independent judiciary, and gentle criminal practices, to the unique conditions of early medieval northern Europe. The English “found” their government “in the forests” of Germany. There, the marginal, variegated terrain favored the dispersion of political power, and a pastoral way of life until well into the Middle Ages. In pursuing a primitive honor unrelated to political liberty as such, the barbaric Franks accidentally established the rudiments of the most “well-tempered” government. His turn to these causes accidental to human purposes in Parts 3-6 begins with his analysis of the problem of unintended consequences in the history of political reform in Parts 1-2. While the idea of balancing political powers in order to prevent any one individual or group from dominating the rest has ancient roots, he shows that it has taken many centuries to understand just what needs to be balanced, and to learn to balance against one threat without inviting another.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuler Dissertation Final Document
    COUNSEL, POLITICAL RHETORIC, AND THE CHRONICLE HISTORY PLAY: REPRESENTING COUNCILIAR RULE, 1588-1603 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anne-Marie E. Schuler, B.M., M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Dutton, Advisor Professor Luke Wilson Professor Alan B. Farmer Professor Jennifer Higginbotham Copyright by Anne-Marie E. Schuler 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation advances an account of how the genre of the chronicle history play enacts conciliar rule, by reflecting Renaissance models of counsel that predominated in Tudor political theory. As the texts of Renaissance political theorists and pamphleteers demonstrate, writers did not believe that kings and queens ruled by themselves, but that counsel was required to ensure that the monarch ruled virtuously and kept ties to the actual conditions of the people. Yet, within these writings, counsel was not a singular concept, and the work of historians such as John Guy, Patrick Collinson, and Ann McLaren shows that “counsel” referred to numerous paradigms and traditions. These theories of counsel were influenced by a variety of intellectual movements including humanist-classical formulations of monarchy, constitutionalism, and constructions of a “mixed monarchy” or a corporate body politic. Because the rhetoric of counsel was embedded in the language that men and women used to discuss politics, I argue that the plays perform a kind of cultural work, usually reserved for literature, that reflects, heightens, and critiques political life and the issues surrounding conceptions of conciliar rule.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Start Your Own Country – Erwin S. Strauss
    HOW TO START YOUR OWN COUNTRY Princess Joan and Prince Roy at Sealand. Erwin S, Strauss HOW 10 START VOUR OWN COUNTRY Erwin S. Strauss PALADIN PRESS • BOULDER, COLORADO How to Start Your Own Country by Erwin S. Strauss Copyright © 1979. 1984, 1999 by Erwin S. Strauss ISBN 13: 978-1-58160-524-2 Printed in the United States of America Published by Paladin Press, a division of Paladin Enterprises, Inc. Gunbarrel Tech Center 7077 Winchester Circle Boulder, Colorado 80301 USA + 1.303.443.7250 Direct inquiries and/or orders to the above address. PALADIN, PALADIN PRESS, and the "horse head" design are trademarks belonging to Paladin Enterprises and registered in United States Patent and Trademark Office. All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, no portion of this book may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the publisher. Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for the use or misuse of information contained in this book. Visit our Web site at www.paladin-press.com The author (right) stands with a member of Operation Atlantis, one of the many new country ventures described in this book (from Atlantis News/ ABOUT THE AUTHOR Erwin S. Strauss was born in Washington, D.C., and grew up along Embassy Row. He lived in Europe and Asia with his German-born father, a consul and First Secretary in the diplomatic service of the United States who served in American missions in Paris and Bangkok. After being expelled from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for a book importing operation that undercut the campus bookstore and publishers owned by MIT and its faculty members, he returned there and received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Franks Free
    FREE THE HISTORY OF THE FRANKS PDF Bishop of Tours Saint Gregory,Lewis Thorpe | 720 pages | 01 Apr 1983 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140442953 | English | London, United Kingdom Gregory of Tours - Wikipedia Gregory of Tours 30 November c. He was born Georgius Florentius and later added the name Gregorius in honour of his maternal great- grandfather. His most notable work was his Decem Libri Historiarum Ten Books of Historiesbetter known as the Historia Francorum History of the Franksa title that later chroniclers gave to it, but he is The History of the Franks known for his accounts of the miracles of saints, especially four books of the miracles of Martin of Tours. Martin's tomb was a major pilgrimage destination in the 6th century, and St. Gregory's writings had the practical effect of promoting this highly organized devotion. Gregory was The History of the Franks in Clermontin the Auvergne region of central Gaul. Gregory had several noted bishops and saints as close relatives his family effectively monopolised the Bishoprics of Tours, Lyons, and Langres at the time of his birthand, according to Gregory, he was connected to thirteen of the eighteen bishops of Tours preceding him by ties of kinship. Gregory's paternal grandmother, Leocadia, descended from Vettius Epagatus, the illustrious martyr of Lyons. His father evidently died while Gregory was young and his widowed mother moved to Burgundy where she had property. Gregory went to live with his paternal uncle St. Gallus, Bishop of Clermontunder whom, and his successor St. Avitus, Gregory had his education. Gregory also received the clerical tonsure from Gallus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight Master, January 1979, Vol. 2 Issue 1
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Fight Master Magazine The Society of American Fight Directors 1-1979 The Fight Master, January 1979, Vol. 2 Issue 1 The Society of American Fight Directors Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/fight Part of the Acting Commons, Other Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, Performance Studies Commons, and the Theatre History Commons tbe Property of the ~oci~t1i of fi9bt J\merinm Jlf igfrt JDirecforz rnaste~ tbe sociefcY of amer2ican fight <lir2ector2s If•'------------------ THE FIGHT MASTER The Magazine of the Society of American Fight Directors 1 'V JANUARY 1979 R€PLICA SWORDS NO. 4 We carry a wide selection of replica Editor - Mike McGraw Lay-out - David:. Boushey swords for theatrical and decorative use. Typed and Duplicated by Mike McGraw 'ilECOMMENDED BY THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FIGHT DIRECTORS *************************************** Society of American Fight Directors The second Society of Fight Directors in the world has been incorporated in Seattle, Washington. Its founder is David Boushey, Overseas Affiliate or the Society of British Fight \ Directors. ,,I OFFICERS a President David L, Boushey 4720 )8th N,E, Seattle, Wa. 98105 Vice President Byron Jennings 1440 Sacramento #6 San Francisco, Calif. 94109 Write for our Illustrated Sec/Treas. Erik Fredricksen catalog ($2,00) and prlca 11st 202 W. 98th #5-D The; .ARMOURY New York, N,Y. 10025 AMERICAN FENCERS SUPPLY CO., 2116 FILLMORE ST.,,SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 . 415/346•8662 2 ANNUAL DUES Membership fees for 1979 are now due, 90% of the 1 the designated time will have to be removed from the society's receipts via dues go-toward the publication membership roster of the society, There are a number of our magazine, The Fight Master.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Quincy Sewall, Jr., the Gentle Boy Hdt What? Index
    EDMUND QUINCY SEWALL, JR., THE GENTLE BOY HDT WHAT? INDEX EDMUND QUINCY SEWALL, JR. THE GENTLE BOY 1692 September 22, Thursday (Old Style): Magistrate Samuel Sewall –the progenitor of the Edmund Quincy Sewall, Jr. of Scituate in the Bay Colony who would begin to attend the Concord Academy in Concord in June 1839 and of the Ellen Devereux Sewall to whom Henry Thoreau would propose– was involved in the offing of 19 women of Salem for being in league with Satan. On this one day Martha Corey, Margaret Scott, Mary Towne Estey or Easty (whose sister, Goodwife Rebecca Towne Nurse, had already been taken to the gallows), Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Wilmott Redd, Samuel Wardwell, and Mary Parker were hanged. FINAL EXECUTIONS Jo. Wilkinson of Sowerby and final beheadings on the famous Halifax Gibbet December 30, 1648 Anthony Mitchell Martha Corey, Margaret Scott, hanged for witchcraft in the American colonies Mary Towne Estey or Easty, “...what a sad thing it is to see Eight Firebrands of September 22, 1692 Alice Parker, Ann Pudeator, Hell hanging there” Wilmott Redd, Samuel Wardwell, and Mary Parker last person to get actually hanged in England, for 1709 Henry Young being judged to have been defeated by his oppo- nent in a Trial by Combat Mary Towne Easty: “...if it be possible no more innocent blood be shed... ...I am clear of this sin.” The Reverend Nicholas Noyes: “What a sad thing to see eight firebrands of hell hanging there.” HDT WHAT? INDEX EDMUND QUINCY SEWALL, JR. THE GENTLE BOY William Hathorne’s son John Hathorne (1641-1717), a chip off the old block, a Colonel in the Massachusetts Militia and a deputy to the General Court in Boston, was a Magistrate during this episode in which in addition to the hangings of this day one woman had a short time before been tortured to death.1 WITCH 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Compurgation and Jury Nullification Notes
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2016 Juror Purgators: The Evolution of Compurgation and Jury Nullification Notes Josh Perldeiner Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Perldeiner, Josh, "Juror Purgators: The Evolution of Compurgation and Jury Nullification Notes" (2016). Connecticut Law Review. 341. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/341 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 48 JULY 2016 NUMBER 5 Note Juror Purgators: The Evolution of Compurgation and Jury Nullification JOSH PERLDEINER The ancient and medieval custom of compurgation, the clearing of one’s name by producing oath-helpers, has a long and colored past in Anglo-American law. Also known as the Wager of Law after the late-11th century and the Norman Conquest, this process made considerable concession to the knowledge and power of local communities; oath-helpers were generally peers, and were considered to know intimate details concerning the case for which they were called. This Note will show that, once compurgation had substantially vanished (whether before or after the Assize of Clarendon), the importance of locality did not simply cease, but rather carried on, taken up through the formal inquest procedure in England. From there, it made its way into the jury trial, which we may trace, insofar as English law is concerned, to the Assize of Clarendon, though it has its beginnings long before that in general European jurisprudence. The final instantiation of this transformative process from compurgation is the power of a jury to nullify. Though juries may no longer be composed of locals expected to know the law, they are still expected to embody some element of local custom.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Bemard S. Bachrach Bernard S
    Professor Bemard S. Bachrach Bernard S. Bachrach Arlnies and Politics in the Early Medieval West VARIORUM WAS THE MARCHFIELD PART OF THE FRANKISH CONSTITUTION? OR many medievalists it is alrnost axiomatic that the Franks of the F Merovingian era were a nation of infantrymen who, disdaining Iior- semanship, could begin campaigns early in the spring before there was sufficient grass for fodder. It is also traditionally held that the armies of Clovis and his descendants gathered on the first day of March each year at a Camp Mar&iw or Marchfield for the purpose of beginning the regular season of military campaigning. Further, scholars have main- tained that King Peppin I moved the muster from March to May so that the newly-created Carolingian cavalry would have enough fodder for its horses.' The traditional picture of the Merovingian army as a horde ,of half-naked axe-throwing infantrymen has recently been shown to be a myth which has flourished because scholars have ignored most of die available evidence and put excessive faith in the remarks of two Byzan- tine writers who were poorly informed.' Freed from previous views of 1 Heinrich Brunner. 'Dcr Rcitcrdicnst und die Anfingt des Lchnwcsens," ZriLrdn/L dn Savigqp-Stifiuna fir Rrc~whuh~.Gmniiiiuhc AbLluilmg. 8 (1887), 1-38; Cliristian Pfister, 'Gaul undcr thc Mcroviwian Franks: lnsti~urions,"Combndgr Mcdur*11 Ilirfoty,p (Camb"dgc.igrg). 135; C. L. Burr. 'The Carlovingian Rcvdution. and Frantish lntcrvcntion in luly:' C,IflI, X. 581; arid Ccrhard Sccligcr. 'tcgidatim and Administration ofCharles thc Crcat," CMIi. X, 669. For nurc rcccnt works, sce R.
    [Show full text]