DOCSLIB.ORG

Minimalist Program and Its Fundamental Improvements in Syntactic Theory: Evidence from Agreement Asymmetry in Standard Arabic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minimalist Program and Its Fundamental Improvements in Syntactic Theory: Evidence from Agreement Asymmetry in Standard Arabic Minimalist program and its fundamental improvements in syntactic theory: evidence from agreement asymmetry in standard Arabic NASSER AL-HORAIS Collage of Arabic Language and Social Studies P.O. Box 6611, Buryadh Qassim University Saudi Arabia E-mail: [email protected] MINIMALIST PROGRAM AND ITS PROGRAMA MINIMALISTA Y SUS PROGRAMME MINIMALISTE ET SES FUNDAMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS IN MEJORAS FUNDAMENTALES EN LA AMÉLIORATIONS FONDAMENTALES DE LA SYNTACTIC THEORY: EVIDENCE FROM TEORÍA SINTÁCTICA: EVIDENCIA DE THÉORIE SYNTAXIQUE: LEÇONS À TIRER AGREEMENT ASYMMETRY IN STANDARD ASIMETRÍA EN EL ACUERDO ÁRABE ACCORD ASYMÉTRIE DANS L'ARABE ARABIC ESTÁNDAR STANDARD ABSTRACT: The Minimalist Program RESUMEN: El Programa Minimalista RÉSUMÉ: Le programme minimaliste is a major line of inquiry that has been constituye una de las líneas est une ligne de recherche majeure developing inside Generative Grammar fundamentales de investigación de la élaborée par chomsky (1993. 1995), since the early nineties, when it was Gramática Generativa que ha elle s’est développée au sein de la proposed by Chomsky (1993, 1995). evolucionado desde que fuera grammaire générative depuis les At the outset, Chomsky (1998: 5) propuesta por Chomsky (1993, années 90 . N. Chomsky présente le presented Minimalist Program as a 1995). Si bien en su día, Chomsky Pogramme minimaliste comme un program, not as a theory, but today, (1998 : 5) lo presentó como programme et non une théorie; mais the Minimalist Program lays out a very programa y no como teoría, en la aujourd’hui, le Pogramme minimaliste specific view of the basis of syntactic actualidad el Programa Minimalista qui jette un regard spécifique sur les grammar that, when compared to representa una visión muy específica fondements de la structure de la other formalisms, is often taken to de las bases de la sintaxis que con grammaire, et comparé à d’autres look very much like a theory. The frecuencia se interpreta como teoría formalismes, est considéré comme une prime concern of this paper, however, cuando se la compara con otros théorie . Néanmoins le souci is to provide a comprehensive and formalismos. Este artículo tiene primordial de cet article est de accessible introduction to the art of como objetivo proporcionar una présenter une introduction the minimalist approach to show its introducción al arte del enfoque compréhensive et accessible de la fundamental improvements in minimalista detallada y a su vez littérature minimaliste pour montrer syntactic theory. And in order to accesible, para mostrar las mejoras ses apports fondamentaux pour la evidence the significance of these que ha efectuado en el campo de la théorie syntaxique. Et pour faire fundamental improvements, the teoría sintáctica. Para demostrar la ressortir la signification de ces apports current paper provides a minimalist importancia de dichos avances, este le présent article présente une analysis to account for agreement and artículo presenta un análisis approche minimaliste pour rendre word-order asymmetry in Standard minimalista de la concordancia y de compte de l’accord et de l’asymétrie de Arabic. This fresh minimalist account la asimetría en el árabe estándar. l’ordre des mots en arabe standard . meets the challenges (to the basic Este nuevo análisis proporciona Cette nouvelle analyse minimaliste tenets of syntactic theory) posed by respuestas a las preguntas que, en embrasse les défis (aux concepts pre-minimalist analyses. relación con los pilares de la teoría cardinaux de la théorie syntaxique) sintáctica, quedaban sin contestar rencontrés dans les analyses en análisis previos al enfoque préminimalistes. minimalista. KEY WORDS: Economy Principles; PALABRAS CLAVES: Principios de MOTS CLÉS: Principes d’économie, Merge; Agree; EPP features; Feature Economía; Ensamble; Concordancia; fusionne, accorde, traits de principes Inheritance, word-order; Agreement rasgos PPE; herencia de rasgos; de projection étendue, héritage de Asymmetry; null subjects. orden de palabras; asimetría de la traits, ordre des mots, accord concordancia; sujetos nulos. asymétrique, sujets nuls. SUMMARY: 1.Introduction. 2. The SUMARIO: 1.Introducción. 2. El SOMMAIRE: 1.Introduction. 2. L Innovation of the MP. 3. Syntactic Innovación de la MP. 3. Derivación 'innovation de la MP. 3. Dérivation Derivation. 4. The EPP feature. 5. sintáctica. 4. El EPP característica. syntaxique. 4. Le PPE fonction. 5. Phases and Feature Inheritance. 6. 5. Fases y herencia de Phases et héritage Feature. 6. Minimalism and Agreement características. 6. Minimalismo y el Minimalisme et Accord asymétrie en Asymmetry in Arabic. 7. A Pre- Acuerdo Asimetría en árabe. 7. Un arabe. 7. Une analyse pré-minimaliste: minimalist analysis: Spec-Head análisis pre-minimalista: Spec-Head Spec-tête accord. 8. Une analyse Agreement. 8. An Alternative Acuerdo. 8. Un análisis alternativo alternative minimaliste. 9. Accord minimalist analysis. 9. Arabic minimalista. 9. Acuerdo en árabe arabe chez les sujets nuls et théorie Agreement in Null Subjects and Sujetos nulos y Teoría Acuerdo. 10. Accord. 10. conclusion. Agreement Theory. 10. Conclusion Conclusión. Fecha de Recepción 27/04/2012 Fecha de Revisión 29/10/2012 Fecha de Aceptación 30/10/2012 Fecha de Publicación 01/12/2012 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2012.i20.01 pragmalingïüística 9 20 (2012) 8-40 Minimalist program and its fundamental improvements in syntactic theory: evidence from agreement asymmetry in standard Arabic NASSER AL-HORAIS 1. INTRODUCTION The Minimalist Program (MP, henceforward) explores the hypothesis that the language faculty is optimal realization of interface conditions, and thus, the strongest minimalist thesis is that language L is an optimal solution to interface conditions imposed on FL by performance systems, and the linguistic expressions generated by L must be legible to these external systems if they are usable (Chomsky 2004). The MP is “a non-redundant and optimal system in the sense that particular phenomena are not over-determined by linguistic principles and that linguistic system is subject to economy restrictions with a least effort flavor” (Hornstein et al 2005: 14). In other words, this new approach strives to create a model of language that eliminates unnecessary steps in the representation of the derivation of a sentence (Brown 1999). Accordingly, the strongest minimalist thesis is that language L is an optimal solution to interface conditions imposed on the Faculty of Language by performance systems, and the linguistic expressions generated by L must be legible to these external systems if they are usable (Chomsky 2001). The current paper mainly aims to give a clear sketch picture of the key premises of the MP, considering in this regard three topics which will be spread over three sections. (i) Section 2 outlines the most features distinguishing the MP from its predecessors, namely Government and Binding theory (GB), and Principles and Parameters theory (PPT). The reason is to show that the MP is motivated not only by the search for the explanatory adequacy, but also for a certain level of formal simplicity. (ii) Section 3 considers ‘the structure-building computation’ that is viewed as a series of a number of operations which are considered to be the heart and soul of the MP. It consists of a small set of basic operations: Select Merge, Agree, Move and Transfer. (iii) Sections 4 & 5 discusse some new ideas articulated recently by Chomsky such as changing the function of movement and the Extended Projection Principle (EPP) feature, or as proposing new theories such as Phases and Feature Inheritance in order to determine the least “costly” derivation and reduce the computational complexity. the rest of this paper is devoted to analyzing the agreement asymmetry system in Standard Arabic under the minimalist assumptions, I would like to express my sincere thanks to Qassim University for supporting this work. I extend my thanks to Anders Holmberg and Jeffrey Pool for insightful comments, suggestions and discussions on an early version of this paper. Errors are mine. 10 Minimalist program and its fundamental improvements in syntactic theory: evidence from agreement asymmetry in standard Arabic NASSER AL-HORAIS in order to prove that the MP handles better the problems found with previous generative analyses of agreement in Arabic, and this strongly gives an example of several fundamental improvements in syntactic theory made by the MP since nineties until today. 2. THE INNOVATION OF THE MP 2.1. ECONOMY PRINCIPLES The MP is distinguished from its predecessors by its 'derivational concept' which provides principles for how an analysis is constructed, rather than providing filtering conditions that constrain output representations (Weinberg, 1999). The main derivational constraints are the so-called ‘Economy Principles, first made explicit in Chomsky (1991), which are considered to be the cornerstone of the MP. As the MP seeks to determine the least “costly” derivation and reduce the computational complexity, it should provide principles for how an analysis is constructed, rather than providing filtering conditions that constrain output representations (Weinberg, 1999). To make this idea clear, Hornstein et al (2005: 8) describe principles of economy as the practice of “placing a premium on least-effort notions as natural sources of grammatical principles”. As pointed out by Motut (2010), the hypothesis that Universal Grammar (UG) itself is based on principles that favour more economical operations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Minimalism Minimalism Is the Name of the Predominant Approach In
    Minimalism Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first introduced by Chomsky in his work The Minimalist Program (1995) and has seen several developments and changes since. The central idea of minimalism is that a linguistic theory should contain as few non-derived assumptions as possible. Many notions that had been developed in earlier generative theory, specifically the Government & Binding theory (GB), have been abandoned, in an attempt to derive them from more basic concepts. In Chomsky's (1995) view, minimalism is an implementation of the more general Principles and Parameters model. According to this language model, the human language capacity consists of a set of universal principles combined with a set of parameters. The principles are thought to be innate, which means that every language adheres to them. The parameters can be thought of as switches that can be set in two positions. Learning the syntax of one's native language, according to Chomsky's view, is a matter of acquiring the correct parameter settings for the language. Chomsky describes syntax as a cognitive system that connects two other cognitive systems: the conceptual-intentional system and the articulatory-perceptual system. Because syntax is linked to these two systems, the syntactic model defines two interface levels, one for each of them: Phonological Form (PF) is the interface to the articulatory-perceptual system, and Logical Form (LF) is the interface to the conceptual-intentional system. The grammar model is built up as follows: a clause is derived by selecting a set of lexical items from the lexicon.
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Linguistics Within the Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Alec Marantz
    Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language Alec Marantz Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT Standard practice in linguistics often obscures the connection between theory and data, leading some to the conclusion that generative linguistics could not serve as the basis for a cognitive neuroscience of language. Here the foundations and methodology of generative grammar are clarified with the goal of explaining how generative theory already functions as a reasonable source of hypotheses about the representation and computation of language in the mind and brain. The claims of generative theory, as exemplified, e.g., within Chomsky’s (2000) Minimalist Program, are contrasted with those of theories endorsing parallel architectures with independent systems of generative phonology, syntax and semantics. The single generative engine within Minimalist approaches rejects dual routes to linguistic representations, including possible extra-syntactic strategies for semantic structure-building. Clarification of the implications of this property of generative theory undermines the foundations of an autonomous psycholinguistics, as established in the 1970’s, and brings linguistic theory back to the center of a unified cognitive neuroscience of language. 2 1. The place of linguistics* The first decade of the 21st century should be a golden era for the cognitive neuroscience of language. Fifty years of contemporary linguistic analysis of language can be coupled with a wide range of brain imaging and brain monitoring machines to test hypotheses and refine theory and understanding. However, there is still a gulf between mainstream linguistics within the generative linguistic tradition and most of those engaged in experimental cognitive neuroscience research. Some have argued that the fault here lies with the linguists, whose generative theories are based in principle on separating the study of linguistic representations from research on the acquisition and use of language in the minds and brains of speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Features from Aspects Via the Minimalist Program to Combinatory Categorial Grammar
    Á. Gallego & D. Ott (eds.). 2015. 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. Available for purchase at http://mitwpl.mit.edu © The Authors FEATURES FROM ASPECTS VIA THE MINIMALIST PROGRAM TO COMBINATORY CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR NEIL SMITH ANNABEL CORMACK University College London 1 Background One major contribution of Aspects (Chomsky 1965)1 was to initiate the development of a theory of syntactic features. There is no use of features, either syntactic or morphophonemic, in Chomsky’s earliest work The Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew (1951/79); they do not appear in his monumental The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1955/75); nor in Syntactic Structures (1957) (except for category labels); nor, except for phonological distinctive features, in Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (1964). In Aspects features play a crucial role. Chomsky suggests (p.214) that “We might, then, take a lexical entry to be simply a set of features, some syntactic, some phonological, some semantic”. But even here the use of features was somewhat haphazard, apparently unconstrained, and a terminological mess. In this contribution we want to trace – in broad outline – the development of a theory of morphosyntactic features and propose a fully Merge-based and parsimonious version of such a theory. Our work is intended as a contribution to Chomsky’s Minimalist Program, pursuing the same ends on the basis of some different background assumptions. These assumptions and the specific analyses derived from them have been developed using an austere version of Combinatorial Categorial Grammar, but are of wider applicability. All current theories use phonological features and ‘semantic’ features which we will largely ignore except to point out that the term ‘semantic’ is used in radically different ways to cover truth-theoretic, conceptual or encyclopaedic distinctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement in Minimalism, Class 2: Linearization and the Problem of Copies July 11, LSA Summer Institute 2017
    Movement in Minimalism, Class 2: Linearization and the problem of copies July 11, LSA Summer Institute 2017 This class: . We discuss Nunes’s (1995, 2004) proposal that copy deletion derives from the demands of the linearization algorithm at PF . We look at cases for which a copy theory has an advantage over a trace theory, involving multiple spell-out in predicate clefting/V-fronting constructions as well as wh-copying . We examine exceptional cases of copy spell-out, including deletion of the highest copy and scattered deletion 1 Two approaches to copy deletion As we discussed last week, Merge provides us with a single structure-building mechanism. Merge can create long-distance dependencies as long as we adopt the Copy Theory of Movement: (1) Which book did you read which book? CP DP C’ which book did TP you T’ did VP read which book However, getting rid of traces in this way means that we need to posit a rule of copy deletion. But where does copy deletion come from? 1.1 Three sources of wellformedness constraints In the Minimalist Program, constraints on wellformedness have only three possible sources: 1. Constraints on the PF interface 2. Constraints on the LF interface 3. Natural principles of computation, often referred to as “economy constraints” =) Copy deletion too should derive from one of these sources. 1 Two of these options have been explored in previous work, and we will discuss them this week: 1. Copy deletion as a result of linearization at PF (Nunes 1995, 2004; cf. Fox and Pesetsky 2005; Johnson 2012): .
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Minimalist Syntax
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF MINIMALIST SYNTAX Timothy Hawes Northeastern University Senior Honors Project Dec, 15 2005 Introduction Many animals communicate with sounds and signs. Birds have elaborate songs to attract mates, some monkeys have special warning cries for different threats and some animals have even been taught to communicate with people using limited vocabularies of signed or spoken words. Each of these forms of communication represents some sort of paring between sound (or actions) and meaning. However, all of these forms of communication differ from human language in one very important feature, productivity. Not only can humans produce sounds that have abstract relations to meanings, but humans have a system of language that is both hierarchically organized and recursive, thus making it infinitely productive. As the only species on earth with language in this sense, it seems logical to conclude that there must be some sort of biological basis for this property. Though the degree to which language is biologically specified has been argued for many years now, it has been generally agreed that there is something specific to humans that gives them the ability to produce language. This special property is known as the “Faculty of Language”, and has long been the object of linguistic inquiry. By studying the Faculty of Language, linguists hope not only to be able to describe languages with all of their variation, but be able to explain the basic properties of language and how children are able to acquire it so easily despite the many factors working against them. In the early 1960’s, linguists were trying to explain language acquisition and linguistic variation with the “format framework”, which relied on rules and constructions to explain grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minimalist Program 1 1 the Minimalist Program
    The Minimalist Program 1 1 The Minimalist Program Introduction It is my opinion that the implications of the Minimalist Program (MP) are more radical than generally supposed. I do not believe that the main thrust of MP is technical; whether to move features or categories for example. MP suggests that UG has a very different look from the standard picture offered by GB-based theories. This book tries to make good on this claim by outlining an approach to grammar based on one version of MP. I stress at the outset the qualifier “version.” Minimalism is not a theory but a program animated by certain kinds of methodological and substantive regulative ideals. These ideals are reflected in more concrete principles which are in turn used in minimalist models to analyze specific empirical phenomena. What follows is but one way of articulating the MP credo. I hope to convince you that this version spawns grammatical accounts that have a theoretically interesting structure and a fair degree of empirical support. The task, however, is doubly difficult. First, it is unclear what the content of these precepts is. Second, there is a non-negligible distance between the content of such precepts and its formal realization in specific grammatical principles and analyses. The immediate task is to approach the first hurdle and report what I take the precepts and principles of MP to be.1 1 Principles-Parameters and Minimalism MP is many things to many researchers. To my mind it grows out of the per- ceived success of the principles and parameters (P&P) approach to grammatical competence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory (Chomsky 1993)
    MIT Fall A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory Chomsky The Minimalist Chronicles Episo de I MIT We Dec To start with some familiar observations regarding Economy Why do DPs move to Ap ositions a The ship was sunk t i i b The ice melted t i i c L es l les ont toutes dans French The girls have allFEMPL danced The girls have all danced Cf Toutes les l les ont dans Bil l seemed to t that the world is round a i i seemed to Bil l that the Cf It b Bil l struck t that the world is round i i Cf It struck Bil l that the Last Resort Move to Sp ec only if some prop erty of or requires it Some version of the Caselter This is an economy consideration Theory What else may not motivate movement to Ap ositions Binding a Sue b elieved herself to seem likely t to win the game i i would win the game b Sue believed herself to seem likely to t that Mary i i Cf Sue believed it to seem likely to her mother that Mary would win the game judgements O to seem to oneself to always be likely to t win is a welcome il lusion a PR i i b PRO to be liked t by everone is wishful thinking i i c PRO to seem to t that Bush is intel ligent is hard to believe i i or it to seem to anyone that Bush is intel ligent is impossible Cf F 1 Handout inspired in great part from Davids exegesis What ab out covert expletive replacement Though there is much to say ab out the story of ther e a There seem to be children in the room b There seem that children are in the room Cf It seems that children are in the room So what exactly do
    [Show full text]
  • Minimalist Grammars and Recognition
    Minimalist grammars and recognition Edward P. Stabler∗ Abstract Recent work has shown how basic ideas of the minimalist tradition in transformational syntax can be captured in a simple generative for- malism, a “derivational minimalism.” This framework can model “rem- nant movement” analyses, which yield more complex antecedent-trace relations, suggesting a new and significant sense in which linguistic structures are “chain based.” Michaelis (1998) showed that these gram- mars correspond to a certain kind of linear context free rewrite system, and this paper takes the next step of adapting the recognition meth- ods for “non-concatenative” grammars (Weir, 1988; Seki et al., 1991; Boullier, 1999). This turns out to be quite straightforward once the grammars are set out appropriately. 1 Chain-based syntax Some recent proposals in transformational syntax involve more movements of larger pieces of structure than have ever been seriously proposed be- fore. According to some of these analyses movement, everything major constituent in a clause moves. For example, in an attempt to get certain lin- guistic universals about constituent order to follow from the architecture of human grammars, Kayne has proposed that there is no right adjunction and no rightward movement. These proposals are at odds with the earlier transformational analyses of structures like: (1) They showed [a picture ti]tome[thatIlike]i Here, it was commonly assumed that the relative clause was right adjoined to the noun phrase apictureand then right extraposed to its final position. To account for the fact that VO languages tend to be prepositional, Kayne (1999) considers the possibility that P enters a derivation not by merging with its object, but rather entering above the VP, like other case assign- ers.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimalism and Language Acquisition
    Minimalism and Language Acquisition Charles Yang & Tom Roeper University of Pennsylvania & UMass Amherst Perhaps more clearly than any other field, the study of child language acquisition highlights the continuity from the Principles & Parameters framework (Chomsky 1981) to the Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1995). As is the case for all meaningful theoretical developments, under Minimalism new challenges emerge, puzzles are cast under different lights, while important insights from previous work can still be retained; this chapter provides an overview of these issues. The first part builds on the continuity from P&P to Minimalism, with focus on the role of parameters in the theory of language acquisition and the mechanisms of learning. The second part turns to the Minimalist innovations, specifically how the new formulations of the syntactic system bring new tools to the explanation of child language. Part I. Formal Issues in Minimalism and Language Acquisition The P&P framework, for the first time, gives a plausible solution to the logical problem of language acquisition: How the child acquires a language so rapidly and accurately Thanks to all of our students and colleagues. The authors’ names are ordered as to reflect the organization of the article. under limited linguistic experience? The principles, which are considered universal, are not learned, and can be expected to be operative in (early) child language; this opens up a wealth of topics for empirical research which continues in the Minimalist era. The parameter values, which vary crosslinguistically, must be learned on the basis of specific linguistic evidence. Thus, the commonalities and differences in children’s acquisition of specific languages receive a unified treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Phrase Structure Directionality: Having a Few Choices
    PHRASE STRUCTURE DIRECTIONALITY: HAVING A FEW CHOICES by ALEXANDRA ZEPTER A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School - New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Linguistics written under the direction of Professor Mark Baker and approved by Mark Baker Jane Grimshaw Ken Safir Peter Sells New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2003 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Phrase Structure Directionality: Having a few Choices by ALEXANDRA ZEPTER Dissertation Director: Professor Mark Baker The thesis claims that the linear organization of specifier, head and complement in a phrase and throughout a syntactic tree is determined by a conflict between general violable constraints on X-bar-structure. The adopted framework is Optimality Theory (cf. Prince & Smolensky 1993; in syntax, cf. Grimshaw 1997). The proposed constraint system explains why phrase structure directionality is mostly uniform and why only some non-uniform cases exist, while other logically possible kinds of mixed directionality are unattested. Central to the dissertation is the idea that head-initial oriented languages have a greater structural conflict to resolve inside their lexical projections than head-final languages: The combination of a general preference for [head - complement]-order and for a left-peripheral specifier bars the lexical head from surfacing at an edge of the phrase. The combination of a general preference for [complement - head]-order and for a left-peripheral specifier still allows alignment at one edge. This greater conflict can be resolved in different ways, which leads to slightly more variation among head-initial oriented languages: Not only do we find uniform SVO-languages, but we also find VOS-languages, VSO-languages and head-initial oriented languages with a head-final verb phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • Biolinguistics, the Minimalist Program, and Psycholinguistic Reality [email protected]
    2. Marie Labelle – Université de Québec à Montréal Biolinguistics, the Minimalist Program, and psycholinguistic reality [email protected] In his recent papers, Chomsky (1999, 2000, 2004, 2005a, 2005b) stresses that the minimalist program is part of a biolinguistic perspective on the language faculty. The biolinguistic framework is justified with reference to studies of neurolinguistics, and uses some psycholinguistically oriented terminology like “derivation”, “computation”, “phase-level memory”, but is curiously staying away from psycholinguistic research, and from basic observations regarding the functioning of the computational system for language processing. One question that has been bothering me for a while is related to the notion of “derivation by phase”: How can the notion of derivation by phase be reconciled with psychological reality? The notion of phase is a development of ideas having a long history in linguistics, those of bounding nodes and barriers. From a linguistic point of view it is unquestionable that these notions are productive. However, the minimalist program explores the idea that the computational system for the human language derives sentences phase by phase, starting from the most embedded one. As soon as a phase is completed, it is sent to the interfaces for interpretation, and a next phase is computed. This is justified with reference to memory load, clearly a psychological notion. However, whether from the point of view of the speaker or of the hearer, the computational system doesn’t treat sentences starting from the most embedded phase in a language like English. Instead of saying : Who said that Mary gave a book to Paul? speakers don’t spell-out something like the following (brackets added to make clear the approximative derivation): [v*Pphase1 gave a book to Paul][CPphase2 that Mary] [v*Pphase3 said][CPphase4 who]? It will not do to assume that speakers can keep in memory all the phases already planned, waiting for the most external phase to be completed, before spelling them out in the reverse order.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimalist Perspectives for Psycholinguistic
    Minimalist perspectives for psycholinguistic research* Perspectivas minimalistas en la investigación psicolingüística Perspectivas minimalistas na pesquisa psicolingüística LETÍCIA M. SICURO CORRÊA** Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Abstract modelo procedimental de la adquisición del lenguaje, el cual reconcilia el procesamiento del habla en los niños, A particular approach to the study of psycholinguistic y la idea del aprendizaje innatamente guiado, con una processes is presented, which is based on a minimalist visión minimalista del estado inicial de la adquisición del conception of language. A procedural model of language lenguaje en una explicación del problema del arranque. acquisition is sketched, which reconciles infants speech La adquisición del lenguaje es vista como procedente processing and the idea of innately guided learning con la especificación progresiva de los rasgos formales with a minimalist view of the initial state of language de las categorías funcionales del léxico. Se discute la acquisition in an account of the bootstrapping problem. posibilidad de que una derivación minimalista sea incor- Language acquisition is viewed as proceeding with porada en un modelo de producción y/o comprensión de the progressive specification of formal features of the frases. Se consideran posibles fuentes de impedimentos functional categories of the lexicon. The possibility of del lenguaje, como los manifestados en el síndrome TEL a minimalist derivation to be incorporated in a sentence (Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje), a la luz de esta production and/or comprehension model is discussed. aproximación integrativa. Se hace referencia al trabajo Possible sources of language impairment, as manifes- experimental llevado a cabo en portugués brasileño, con ted in SLI (Specific Language Impairment) syndrome, alguna extensión al portugués europeo y al español del are considered in the light of this integrative approach.
    [Show full text]