DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNEX 2 FINAL Lop Jt St Budapest -30 Jan 09 Danube Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNEX 2 FINAL Lop Jt St Budapest -30 Jan 09 Danube Commission Joint Statement Meeting on 29-30 Jan. 2009 in Budapest List of participants № NAME COUNTRY ORGANIZATION E-mail address Working Groups WG 1 Facilitating better application of the Joint Statement in IWT projects WG 2 Securing future development of and adherence to the JS 1. Mr. GRILL LEO AUSTRIA Ministry of transport Innovation [email protected] WG1 and Technology Institute for Water Management, 2. Hydrology and Hydraulic [email protected] Mr. HABERSACK WG2 AUSTRIA Engineering, BOKU-University HELMUT for Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna 3. Mr.MUILERMAN AUSTRIA Via Donau-Österreichische [email protected] WG2 GERT-JAN Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft 4. Mr. SIMONER AUSTRIA Via Donau-Österreichische [email protected] WG2 MARKUS Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH 5. Mr. STADLER AUSTRIA BMLFUW Wien AT [email protected] WG 1 RICHARD 6. Mr. SCHWETZ OTTO AUSTRIA CORRIDOR VII, TINA [email protected] WG1 VIENNA TRANSPORT STRATEGIES [email protected] 7. Mr. KARKIN KEMAL BOSNIA AND Ministry of Communication and HERZEGOVINA Transport [email protected] WG1 8. Mrs. MEHMEDOVSKI BOSNIA AND Ministry of Communications and [email protected] WG1 SENAIDA HERZEGOVINA Transport 9. Mr. BENOV PETAR BULGARIA Ministry of Transport [email protected] WG1 10. Mr.GEORGIEV BULGARIA Agency for Exploration and WG1 GEORGI Maintenance of the Danube River [email protected] 11. Mrs.MARTINOVA BULGARIA Agency for Maritime Exploration DESISLAVA and Maintenance WG1 12. Mrs.NAYDENOVA BULGARIA Ministry of Env.and Water – [email protected] KATYA “EIA and SEA” Dep. WG1 NATURA 2000 Department, National 13. Mrs. SLAVOVA BULGARIA Nature Protection Service, Ministy [email protected] EMILIYA Environment and Water WG1 Mrs. MARINA IVICA- Ministry of Maritime, [email protected] 14. MATKOVAC CROATIA Transport and Infrastructure WG1 15. Mr. ISTUK MIROSLAV CROATIA Agency for IWT [email protected] - 16. Mr. RADELJAK IVAN CROATIA HIDROING-Osijek [email protected] - 17. Mr. TADIC ZDENKO CROATIA HIDROING-Osijek [email protected] - 18. Mrs.ACKERMANN GERMANY German Ministry of Transport [email protected] WG1 EVA Federal Ministry for the 19. Mr. BEYER KNUT GERMANY Environment, Nature [email protected] WG1 Conservation and Nuclear Safety 20. Mr. SCHERF DIETER GERMANY Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.v. [email protected] WG2 [email protected] Bavarian Ministry For Economic 21. Mr. VON RIMSCHA GERMANY Affairs, Infrastructure, Transport [email protected] WG1 NICOLAI and Technology e 22. Mrs. ZENKER VERENA GERMANY Embassy of Germany in Budapest [email protected] WG1 - 23. Mr. KOVÁCS PETÉR HUNGARY Ministry of Environment and [email protected] Water Ministry of Environment and - 24. Mr. KOVÁCS GYORGY HUNGARY Water [email protected] Ministry of Economy and - 25. Mr. MARTON TAMAS HUNGARY Transport [email protected] 26. Mr. TOTH BALÁZS HUNGARY Duna-Ipoly National Park [email protected] WG2 27. MR.MARTIN EDGAR MOLDOVA Giurguilesti International Free [email protected] WG2 Port 28. Mr. COSTACHE ROMANIA Ministry of Environment [email protected] WG2 MIHAIL 29. Mr. ALEXE FLORIN ROMANIA TRAPEC BUCHAREST [email protected] WG1 30. Mr. BALCU ROMANIA TRAPEC BUCHAREST [email protected] WG1 ALEXANDRU Ministry of Transport WG1 31. Mrs. CUC CRISTINA ROMANIA [email protected] - 32. Mrs. TARASOVA RUSSIAN Russian Federation Embassy in [email protected] IRINA FEDERATION Budapest Institute for the development of 33. Mrs. BABI Ć SERBIA water resourses “Jaroslav Cerni” MLADENOVI Ć Marina.Babic- WG1 MARINA [email protected] Ministry of Agriculture, forestry 34. MRS. LAZAREVIC SERBIA and Water Management [email protected] MARIJA WG2 [email protected] 35. Mr. MIHAJLOVI Ć SERBIA Directorate for Inland waterways WG1 LJUBIŠA - PLOVPUT Ć 36. Mrs. OSTOJI SERBIA Directorate for Inland waterways [email protected] WG2 BARJAKTAREVI Ć – PLOVPUT ŽANETA Ministry of Transport, Post and [email protected] 37. Mr. CAKY PETER SLOVAKIA Telecommunication WG1 38. Mr.HOLCIK SLOVAKIA Water Management Engineering WG2 VLADIMIR 39. Mr.JENCIK GABRIEL SLOVAKIA Hydro-system GABCIKOVO WG1 40. Mrs. SRSNOVA OLGA SLOVAKIA Ministry of Environment [email protected] WG2 [email protected] 41. Mrs. SVERENYAK UKRAINE Embassy of Ukraine in Budapest [email protected] WG1 VICTORIA 42. Mrs.PEIJS KARLA EU EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG-TREN WG1 43. Mr.BERNABEI EU EUROPEAN COMMISSION [email protected] WG2 CESARE DG-TREN 44. Mr.DEMETER EU Nature and Biodiversity Unit, [email protected] WG2 ANDRAS Directorate General Environment, European Commission 45. Mrs. BRAILESCU EU EC-DG ENV [email protected] WG2 CRISTINA 46. Mrs. NICOLAESCU EU EC-DG REGIO [email protected] WG1 IRINA 47. Mrs.NATALIE EU EC-DG REGIO [email protected] WG2 VERSCHELDE 48. Mrs.SUNDSETH EU The N2K GROUP (Ecosystems)- [email protected] WG1 KERSTIN consultant to DG ENV 49. Mr.VAN BOCKEL EU Netherlands Ministry of [email protected] WG1 ROELAND Transport / PLATINA 50. Mr. PAULI GERNOT CCNR Commission Centrale pour la [email protected] WG2 Navigation du Rhin 51. Mr. RUSCHE JÖRG EBU EBU-European Barge Union [email protected] WG2 52. Mr. KUKOBAT RCC Regional Cooperation Council [email protected] WG2 MIROSLAV (RCC) Southeast European Cooperative 53. Mrs. GJORESKA SECI [email protected] Initiative WG2 ALEXANDRA WG2 54. Mr. NAGL GERHARD DEF Danube Environmental Forum [email protected] (DEF) 55. Mrs. EREIFEJ LAURICE WWF WWF Hungary [email protected] WG2 56. Mr. GRUBER TAMÁS WWF WWF Hungary [email protected] WG1 57. Mrs. LUCIUS IRENE WWF WWF GERMANY-Danube- [email protected] WG1 Carpathian Programme 58. Mrs. IGNJATOVIC REC REC for Central and Eastern [email protected] WG1 JOVANKA Europe - 59. Mr.MOTHPOULSEN FAO Food and Agriculture [email protected] THOMAS Organization of the UN (FAO) Office of the Parliamentary 60. Mrs. BERCZI ANNA OPCFG Commissioner for Future [email protected] WG1 Generation Office of the Parliamentary 61. Mr. BARANYAI OPCFG Commissioner for Future [email protected] WG1 GABOR Generation 62. Mr.WELLER PHILIP ICPDR International Commission for the [email protected] WG2 Protection of the Danube River 63. Mrs.VOGEL BIRGIT ICPDR International Commission for the [email protected] WG1 Protection of the Danube River 64. Mr. ZINKE ICPDR International Commission for the [email protected] WG1 ALEXANDER Protection of the Danube River [email protected] - 65. Mr. BACIC BRANKO ISRBC International Sava River Basin [email protected] Commission [email protected] 66. Mr. KOMATINA ISRBC International Sava River Basin WG1 DEJAN Commission [email protected] 67. Mr. MILKOVIC ISRBC International Sava River Basin WG2 ZELJKO Commission - 68. Mr.SAVOLSKIY IGOR DC Danube Commission [email protected] - 69. Mr.SUVOROV PJOTR DC Danube Commission [email protected] - 70. Mr.ANDA KAROL DC Danube Commission danail.nedialkov@danubecom- - 71. Mr.NEDIALKOV DC Danube Commission intern.org DANAIL [email protected] - 72. Mr.PETAR MARGIC DC Danube Commission [email protected] WG2 73. Mr.POPA CIPRIAN DC Danube Commission [email protected] WG1 74. Mr.SCHINDLER DC Danube Commission HORST [email protected] WG1 75. Mrs. SMIRNOVA DC Danube Commission IRINA - [email protected] 76. Mr.STEMMER DC Danube Commission ALEXANDER [email protected] WG2 77. Mrs.TOMIC IVANA DC Danube Commission .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reducing Conflict Over the Danube Waters: Equitable Utilization and Sustainable Development
    ', "*k. t, 1' 210 97RE Natural Resources rnrum. Vol. 21. No. I. pp. 23 -38. 1997 Pergamon ~t', 1997 United Nalions Published by hlM-'vier Science Lid ['rimed in Great Britain IMI: SO 165-0203(96)00004-9 0165-0203/97 SI7.00+ 0.00 Reducing conflict over the Danube waters: equitable utilization and sustainable development Rhoda Margesson This paper develops the idea that the principle of equitable utilization must be applied in concert with sustainable water use not only in the resolution of specific disputes but in the cooperative management of water resources in general. It illustrates this point with two different cases involving the use of the Danube River. The first is the conflict over the Gabcikovo Nagymaros Dam, which now rests before the International Court of Justice. The author argues that a narrow legal ruling that fails to take into account broader issues of equitable utilization as they relate to sustainable development will not satisfactorily address the long-term questions at slake between the parties. The second involves the situation in the Danube Delta where the potential for conflict exists, but may be minimized through the convention and institutional framework developed to address the environmental degradation and pollution of the Danube River basin, which is based in part on the principle of equitable utilization and the goal of achieving more sustainable water use. The paper provides a brief overview of the geographical features of the Danube River and international water law. It then explores the principle of equitable utilization and sustainable water use in light of the two cases and discusses the implications for the.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint
    Manual on Danube Navigation Imprint Published by: via donau – Österreichische Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH Donau-City-Straße 1, 1220 Vienna [email protected] www.via-donau.org Responsibility for content: Hans-Peter Hasenbichler Project management: Martin Paschinger Editing: Thomas Hartl, Vera Hofbauer Technical contributions: Maja Dolinsek, Simon Hartl, Thomas Hartl, Brigitte Hintergräber, Vera Hofbauer, Martin Hrusovsky, Gudrun Maierbrugger, Bettina Matzner, Lisa-Maria Putz, Mario Sattler, Juha Schweighofer, Lukas Seemann, Markus Simoner, Dagmar Slavicek Sponsoring: Hedwig Döllinger, Hélène Gilkarov Layout: Bernd Weißmann Print: Grasl Druck & Neue Medien GmbH Vienna, January 2013 ISBN 3-00-009626-4 © via donau 2013 Klimaneutrale Produktion Erneuerbare Energie Nachhaltiges Papier Pflanzenölfarben The Manual on Danube Navigation is a project of the National Action Plan Danube Navigation. Preface Providing knowledge for better utilising the Danube’s potential In connection with the Rhine, the Danube is more and more developing into a main European traffic axis which ranges from the North Sea to the Black Sea at a distance of 3,500 kilometres, thereby directly connecting 15 countries via waterway. Some of the Danube riparian states show the highest economic growth rates amongst the states of Europe. Such an increase in trade entails an enormous growth of traffic in the Danube corridor and requires reliable and efficient transport routes. The European Commission has recognised that the Danube waterway may serve as the backbone of this dynamically growing region and it has included the Danube as a Priority Project in the Trans-European Transport Network Siim Kallas (TEN-T) to ensure better transport connections and economic growth. Vice-President of the European Prerequisite for the utilisation of the undisputed potentials of inland naviga- Commission, Commissioner for tion is the removal of existing infrastructure bottlenecks and weak spots in the Transport European waterway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Version
    FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITIES? THE POLITICS OF REGIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 1990-2007 By Luciana-Alexandra Ghica Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: András Bozóki CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 I hereby declare that this work is entirely my own, except where otherwise indicated, and that it does not contain materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. Luciana Alexandra Ghica Budapest, 3 September 2008 CEU eTD Collection ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I investigate from a social constructivist perspective how international regionalism has become a widespread phenomenon in post Cold War Central and Eastern Europe, although the historical and political circumstances were not pointing towards this development. Existing scholarship on the topic, focusing mostly on the regional intergovernmental arrangements established in the aftermath of the Yugoslav wars, seems to agree that the European Union had the decisive role in the process, even if not through direct intervention. Instead, I argue that democratic rather than EU conditionality was mostly at play in this case. At the same time, post Cold War regionalism has been also a race to appropriate better mental spaces in the attempt to be recognised as part of the democratic community. In order to investigate this hypothesis of democratic conditionality and rhetoric action, I analyze comparatively the creation and evolution of the major Central and East European regional intergovernmental initiatives. For this purpose, I use the conceptual frameworks of social constructivism and international regionalism, which I further develop particularly through the introduction of the concept of regional cohesiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • River / 3-4/2015
    Danube Watch THE MAGAZINE OF THE DANUBE RIVER / WWW.ICPDR.ORG 3-4/2015 Danube Day 2015 SPECIAL FOLD-OUT 12 Fighting For the sturgeons 16 saving a sacreD river Experts from the Danube and the Ganges Rivers are sharing knowledge and experiences on protecting these unique rivers to help river basins achieve their shared goals. 3 Dear readers 8 Providing safe passage routes 14 Danube:Future, achieving 20 Remember the river: using on the Columbia River integrated sustainable art to connect students to 4 News & events development in the Danube the Danube 10 Groundwater: River Basin 6 A state of the sector: the river’s invisible twin 22 The road to environmentally looking at water and waste- 16 Saving a sacred river sustainable inland waterway water in the Danube Basin 12 Fighting for the sturgeons navigation 18 Taking hydromorphology assessments for a test drive 23 Danube Adventure: learning about the river in a 19 Nitrogen pollution playful way in the Danube Basin 20 Štúrovo, Slovakia students on each side of 18 the Danube in hungary and Pielach River, slovakia are linking their Lower Austria recollections together to to help countries develop explore how the Danube an assessment metho- crosses borders and unifies dology for all the WFD people. hydromorphology quality elements, water experts head to the field to test drive four of the methodo- logies. Dear readers, © ICPDR It has been a great pleasure cooperating with all of Cooperation with other commissions has been an the distinguished Heads of Delegations and experts important part of the ICPDR since its establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Insight Inland Navigation in Europe
    MARKET INSIGHT INLAND NAVIGATION IN EUROPE PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2021 Market Insight Published in INLAND NAVIGATION IN EUROPE April 2021 Please find all our data at: www.inland-navigation-market.org TABLE OF CONTENTS FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC ON INLAND WATERWAYS (P.5) 01 Transport performance in Europe (p.6) Passenger transport (p.14) Transport volume in main European IWT countries (p.16) Dry bulk, liquid bulk and container transport (p.17) OPERATING CONDITIONS (P.21) 02 Impact of water levels (p.22) Freight rates in the Rhine region (p.29) Cost evolution (p.32) FOCUS ON FRANCE (P.39) 03 Inland waterway traffic in French ports (p.40) Fact sheet IWT in France (p.42) IWW freight transport in France for the two largest cargo segments (p.44) CCNR MARKET INSIGHT - APRIL 2021 4 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC ON INLAND WATERWAYS CCNR MARKET INSIGHT - APRIL 2021 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC ON INLAND WATERWAYS 5 01 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC ON INLAND WATERWAYS • Transport performance (TKM) on inland waterways in the EU decreased by 8.1% in the first three quarters of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019. • In the two largest IWT countries the decrease was -11.9% (Germany) and -6.8% (the Netherlands). In Danube countries, transport performance was 9% lower. • Passenger transport (river cruises) recorded a reduction of passengers by 90-95%. CCNR MARKET INSIGHT - APRIL 2021 6 FREIGHT AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC ON INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE IN EUROPE TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE IN IWT ON THE NATIONAL TERRITORY OF EACH COUNTRY IN EUROPE
    [Show full text]
  • Danube Developments Against the Backdrop of History and Geopolitics Thoughts on the Region-Constituting Role of the Danube
    1. Korrektur DER DONAURAUM Jahrgang 52 – Heft 2/2012 Tamás Hardi Danube Developments against the Backdrop of History and Geopolitics Thoughts on the region-constituting role of the Danube Introduction As traffic and delivery route, a river contributes significantly to organizing the economy of a region, and as such it also shapes the economic spatial structure. The investigative approach employed here primarily focuses on which role the river might have played in the economic development of the region in the various eras of economic history; in addition, the – especially geopolitical – reasons are examined, why the Danube could not fully meet the economic needs (cf. Hardi 2012). Two facts should be mentioned that provide reasons why the economy along the Danube has thus far made only little use of waterborne transport: on one hand, a regional system of relations whose axis and requirements the river might have been able to secure did not develop in any branch of the economy in our region. During the industrialization the national economies along the Danube rather became competitors instead of complementary systems. On the other hand, the water transport network that would have ensured the efficiency of waterborne transport, such as navigable tributaries, a system of distance-reducing and connecting channels, ports, connections to other traffic systems (e.g. railroads), was not developed. Thus the extremely long waterway existing today is primarily suitable for handling transit traffic and can contribute little to the development of the regional system of relations. The past two hundred years of development of the regional economy and related development of the Danube as waterway can be divided into characteristic sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Danube River Authors: Aaron T
    1 Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: The Environmental program for the Danube River Authors: Aaron T. Wolf and Joshua T. Newton 1. Case summary River basin: Danube (figure 1 and table 1) Dates of negotiation: 1985 to 1994 Relevant parties: All riparian states of the Danube: Hungary, Romania, Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Germany, the Czech Republic, Moldova, and Ukraine, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, Switzerland, Albania, Poland. Convention is the first designed through the process of public participation, including NGOs, journalists, and local authorities Flashpoint: None—good example of "conflict preclusion" Issues: Stated objectives: to provide an integrated, basin-wide framework for protecting Danube water quality Additional issues: Water-related: encourage communication between water-related agencies, NGOs, and individuals; Non-water: none Excluded issues: Strong enforcement mechanism Criteria for water allocations: None determined Incentives/linkage: World Bank/donor help with quality control Breakthroughs: No untoward barriers to overcome; creation of the Danube River Basin Strategy on Public Participation Status: Convention signed in 1994. Cooperation has continued to be fruitful and well managed. 2. Background The Danube River basin is the heart of central Europe and is Europe's second longest river, at a length of 2,857 km. The drainage basin drains 817,000 km2 including all of Hungary, most of Romania, Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, and Slovakia; and significant parts of Bulgaria, Germany, the Czech Republic, Moldova, Serbia, and Ukraine. Bosnia and Herzegovina, and small parts of Italy, Switzerland, Albania and Poland are also included in the basin. The Danube River discharges into the Black Sea through a delta, which is the second largest wetland area in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Strategy for the Danube – Preliminaries, Mechanisms, Positions, Priorities and Effects –
    The European Union strategy for the Danube – Preliminaries, mechanisms, positions, priorities and effects – Authors*: Emilian M. DOBRESCU, Adriana GRIGORESCU bstract: The European Union Strategy for the Danube is an internal EU strategy where all river-side countries are invited to take part, complying Awith the three principles applied also in the case of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. The three pillars proposed by the European Commission and which the Strategy centers round are: connectivity (transport, energy, telecommunication), environmental protection and water management, as well as the socio-economic development (culture, education, tourism, rural development). The European Commission proposed to launch and organize a public debate in all river-side countries, conferences, seminars and round tables. The outcome of these debates will lie in the European Commission working out and bringing up, together with the river states, a paper on the theme of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, and also a Plan of Action. This will comprise the detailed analysis of the present state and will propose a list of strategic projects. The implementation of the Plan of Action will be monitored by the European Commission and will be periodically up- dated, according to the economic conditions and the social trends in the region. Keywords: strategy, connectivity, environmental protection, water management, socio-economic development, sustainable development JEL Classification: N5; N7; Q4; R4 * Emilian M. DOBRESCU, Ph.D., Professor, Scientific Secretary of the Economic, Law and Sociology Section of the Romanian Academy, e-mail: [email protected]; Adriana GRIGORESCU, Ph.D., Professor, SNSPA, e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Agreement” of the Loen and Leppert Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 12, folder “Helsinki Agreement” of the Loen and Leppert Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. .. Digitized from Box 12 of the Loen and Leppert Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library July 23, 1975 Confe:rence on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) The Soviet Union first p:roposed a European security conference on February 10, 1954, and periodically reiterated the proposal in subsequent yea:rs. It received little initial enthusiasm'from Western and neutra:-1 nations, but following increa·sed.bilateral initiatives toward detente, a renewed Warsaw Pact appeal from Budapest on March 17, 1969 elicited a cautiously positive reaction from NATO. The United States and our NATO allies took .the· position that such a conference might serve a useful purpose, but only after concrete progress had been achieved on the most sensitive aspect of East-West confrontation in Europe, namely Berlin. It was specified in successive NATO documents beginning in December 1969 that conclusion of a.
    [Show full text]
  • Danube Commission Brussels, January 9Th, 2014 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM, Public Hearing ‘’NAIADES II’’ Towards an optimal integration of inland waterways in the transport chain capt. Petar Margić Danube Commission Brussels, January 9th, 2014 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND DANUBE • the world’s most international river basin • great role in the development of external economic relations in Europe DANUBE COMMISSION • one of the oldest intergovernmental organization in Europe (1856) DC Session (1961) Participants to the Congress of Paris (1856) European Parliament – Committee on Transport and Tourism, Public Hearing ‘’NAIADES II’’ Brussels, January 9th, 2014 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND • Convention regarding the Regime of Navigation on the Danube (BC), 1948 establishment of the Danube Commission (DC) 11 Member States (1948, 1998) Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, R.Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Ukraine. 9 Observers (2001, 2006, 2008, 2012) Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, FYRM, Greece, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Turkey. European Parliament – Committee on Transport and Tourism, Public Hearing ‘’NAIADES II’’ Brussels, January 9th, 2014 TASKS specified in Art. 8 of the Belgrade Convention • define the plan of major works on the Danube river in the interests of the navigation • establishment of a unified system of signals and pilot services • unification of rules of river surveillance • coordination of hydrometeorological services • harmonization of inland navigation rules • deliver advice, recommendations • provide statistical data on
    [Show full text]
  • The 90 Th Session of the Danube Commission
    DONAUKOMMISSION DONAUKOMMISSION COMMISSION DU DANUBE COMMISSION DU DANUBE ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ PRESS RELEASE The 29th of June, on the occasion of the 70 years of the signature of the Convention regarding the regime of navigation on the Danube, the Danube Commission gathered in Belgrade, Serbia to strengthen the partnership and the cooperation between its Member States to promote freedom of navigation on the Danube. The 90th Session of the Danube Commission, hosted by the Republic of Serbia, was held in the Palace of Serbia in Belgrade under the chairmanship of Gordan Grlić Radman, President of the Danube Commission. The delegations of all eleven-member states of the Danube Commission (Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia and Ukraine) as well as representatives of the observer states (Greece, Turkey, Czechia and Belgium) participated in the session. The session was also attended by representatives of several international organizations (European Commission, Central Commission for the Navigation on Address: Hungary, H-1068 Budapest, Benczúr utca 25. Phone: +36-1-461-80-10, Fax: +36-1-352-18-39, E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.danubecommission.org DONAUKOMMISSION DONAUKOMMISSION COMMISSION DU DANUBE COMMISSION DU DANUBE ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ the Rhine, Pro Danube Serbia, International Sava River Basin Commission, International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River and Mosselle Commission). The President opened the 90th session with a speech concerning the tasks of the Commission in 2018 and recalling future projects. Afterwards, Director-General Petar Margić presented the activities performed by the Secretariat since December 2017 as well as the main obectives, mentioning the projects in which the Commission participates.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release of the Danube Commission
    DONAUKOMMISSION DONAUKOMMISSION COMMISSION DU DANUBE COMMISSION DU DANUBE ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ ДУНАЙСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ PRESS RELEASE The Danube Commission (DC), under the presidency of the Representative of the Republic of Croatia in the Danube Commission, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Republic of Croatia, H.E. Mr. Gordan Grlić Radman, held its 94th session on 11th December 2020 at the premises of the Danube Commission in Budapest. The 94th session, previously scheduled for 9th June 2020, was postponed due to restrictions on entry and movement of foreign nationals in Hungary due to the spread of the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19. Taking into account the evolving pandemic situation as well as the needs related to the DC’s activities, the session was held in a hybrid format, allowing the presence of delegations both in the meeting room and remotely online. The delegations of all eleven Member States of the Danube Commission (Republic of Austria, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Bulgaria, Republic of Croatia, Hungary, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Republic of Serbia, Slovak Republic, Ukraine) participated in the session. A significant development of the 94th session of the DC was the election of a new Presidency of the organization. As a result of the vote, the Presidency of the DC was elected as follows: President – Ambassador of Ukraine in Hungary, Her Excellency Mrs. Liubov NEPOP, Vice- President – Ambassador of the Republic of Serbia in Hungary, His Excellency Mr. Ivan TODOROV, and Secretary – Representative
    [Show full text]