DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2020 INCSR 2020 Volume 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Common Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... iii International Agreements.................................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Basis for the INCSR ......................................................................................................................... 2 Presidential Determination ................................................................................................................................. 7 Policy and Program Developments .................................................................................................... 12 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production .......................................................... 18 Parties to UN Conventions ............................................................................................................................... 23 (with dates ratified/acceded) ............................................................................................................................. 23 USG Assistance ................................................................................................................................... 29 International Training ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) ......................................................................................................... 34 United States Coast Guard (USCG) .................................................................................................................. 37 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ...................................................................................................... 39 Chemical Controls ............................................................................................................................... 43 Synthetic Drugs ................................................................................................................................... 79 Country Reports .................................................................................................................................. 89 Afghanistan ...................................................................................................................................................... 90 Albania ............................................................................................................................................................ 93 Algeria ............................................................................................................................................................. 94 Argentina ......................................................................................................................................................... 95 The Bahamas ................................................................................................................................................... 96 Belgium ........................................................................................................................................................... 99 Belize............................................................................................................................................................. 100 Benin ............................................................................................................................................................. 103 Bolivia ........................................................................................................................................................... 104 Brazil ............................................................................................................................................................. 108 Burma ............................................................................................................................................................ 111 Cabo Verde .................................................................................................................................................... 115 Canada ........................................................................................................................................................... 116 China ............................................................................................................................................................. 117 Colombia ....................................................................................................................................................... 121 Costa Rica ...................................................................................................................................................... 124 Cuba .............................................................................................................................................................. 128 Dominican Republic ....................................................................................................................................... 129 Dutch Caribbean ............................................................................................................................................ 132 Eastern Caribbean .......................................................................................................................................... 135 Ecuador.......................................................................................................................................................... 138 El Salvador .................................................................................................................................................... 142 Georgia .......................................................................................................................................................... 145 Ghana ............................................................................................................................................................ 146 Guatemala ...................................................................................................................................................... 149 Guyana .......................................................................................................................................................... 153 Haiti ............................................................................................................................................................... 156 Honduras ....................................................................................................................................................... 159 India .............................................................................................................................................................. 163 i INCSR 2020 Volume 1 Table of Contents Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................................... 167 Iran ................................................................................................................................................................ 170 Jamaica .......................................................................................................................................................... 171 Kazakhstan..................................................................................................................................................... 174 Kenya ............................................................................................................................................................ 177 Kyrgyz Republic ............................................................................................................................................ 180 Laos ............................................................................................................................................................... 183 Liberia ........................................................................................................................................................... 186 Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................................ 189 Mali ............................................................................................................................................................... 190 Mexico ..........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Policy Perspective on the Global Use of Smokeless Tobacco
    Curr Addict Rep DOI 10.1007/s40429-017-0166-7 TOBACCO (AH WEINBERGER, SECTION EDITOR) A Policy Perspective on the Global Use of Smokeless Tobacco Kamran Siddiqi1 & Aishwarya Lakshmi Vidyasagaran1 & Anne Readshaw1 & Ray Croucher2 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Keywords Smokeless tobacco . Snus . Tobacco control . Background Globally, over 300 million people consume di- Global health verse smokeless tobacco (ST) products. They are addictive, cause cancer, increased cardiovascular mortality risks and poor pregnancy outcomes. Introduction Purpose of Review To identify gaps in implementing key ST demand-reduction measures, focused literature reviews were “Smokeless tobacco” (ST) comprises tobacco products that do conducted and findings synthesized according to relevant not involve a combustion process, such as chewing, nasal and WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) oral tobacco [1•]. Globally, over 300 million people consume Articles. ST [1•], yet ST has been largely neglected in research and Recent Findings The literature supports implementation of policy arenas because it is generally regarded as less harmful ST demand-reduction measures. For taxation, labelling and than cigarettes. It is also seen as a regional rather than a global packaging, most administrations have weaker policies for ST problem, and too diverse and complex to control. than cigarettes. Capacity to regulate ST contents and offer ST use is reported in at least 116 countries worldwide, cessation support is lacking. There is poor compliance with including countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and the bans on ST advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Americas [2•]. Smokeless tobacco consumption is therefore Summary The literature on implementation of WHO a global public health issue.
    [Show full text]
  • International Narcotics Control Strategy Report
    United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2017 INCSR 2017 Volume 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. iii International Agreements .......................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Policy and Program Developments ......................................................................................................... 17 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production ............................................... 24 (with dates ratified/acceded) ................................................................................................................... 30 USG Assistance ..................................................................................................................................... 36 International Training .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The FARC and Colombia's Illegal Drug Trade
    LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM © JOHN VIZCANO/Reuters The FARC and Colombia’s Illegal Drug Trade By John Otis November 2014 Introduction In 2014, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, Latin America’s oldest and largest guerrilla army known as the FARC, marked the 50th anniversary of the start of its war against the Colombian government. More than 220,000 people have been killed1 and more than five million people uprooted2 from their homes in the conflict, which is the last remaining guerrilla war in the Western Hemisphere. However, this grim, half-century milestone coincides with peace negotiations between the Colombian government and the FARC that began in Havana, Cuba, in November 2012. The Havana talks have advanced much farther than the three previous efforts to negotiate with the FARC and there is a growing sense that a final peace treaty is now likely.3 So far, the two sides have reached agreements on three of the five points on the negotiating agenda, including an accord to resolve an issue that helps explain why the conflict has lasted so long: The FARC’s deep involvement in the taxation, production, and trafficking of illegal drugs. On May 16, 2014, the government and the FARC signed an agreement stating that under the terms of a final peace treaty, the two sides would work in tandem to eradicate coca, the plant used to make cocaine, and to combat cocaine trafficking in areas under guerrilla control. The FARC “has promised to effectively contribute, in diverse and practical ways, to a definitive solution to the problem of illegal drugs,” Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos said in a televised speech the day the accord was signed.4 “The Havana talks have advanced much farther than the three previous efforts to negotiate with the FARC and there is a growing sense that a final peace treaty is now likely.” A month later, Santos secured more time to bring the peace talks to a successful conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking on Trafficking
    COOPEration Taking on Trafficking The Central Asian Counternarcotics Initiative promises a united front against opiates By per Concordiam Staff n August 9, 2011, police in Tajikistan arrested three men and seized nearly 32 kilograms of heroin. The three men – a Tajik, a russian and a Kyrgyz – formed a multiethnic gang Orepresentative of the regional spread of heroin traffick- ing. Almost daily, opium and its derivative heroin are smuggled out of Afghanistan into Central Asia en route to russia and Western Europe, leaving a trail of crime and drug addiction. A month before that big arrest, the United States Department of State put forth a new plan to intensify the fight against drug trafficking in Central Asia. “The new Central Asian Counternarcotics Initiative (CACI) would establish counternarcotics task forces in the five Central Asian countries (Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan) that would collaborate with similar units that already exist in Afghanistan and russia,” according to an article in World Politics Review. The U.S. State Department would pay for training of personnel and purchase much-needed equipment. Successful implementation of CACI would create a law enforcement network that, World Politics Review noted, “would link both the main narcotics source country, Afghanistan, with key transit countries,” allowing authorities to tackle the narcotics trafficking problem from multiple angles. 40 per Concordiam “According to a 2010 report from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Afghanistan produces 85 percent of the world’s heroin, and almost one-fourth of that is exported through post-Soviet Central Asia.” A counternarcotics specialist embedded with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • PHASE IV and the Vienna Declaration PARIS PACT PARTNERS
    www.paris-pact.net >> PHASE IV and the Vienna Declaration PARIS PACT PARTNERS 58 PARIS PACT PARTNER COUNTRIES Afghanistan (Islamic Republic of) Denmark Latvia Serbia Albania Estonia Lithuania Slovakia Armenia Finland Luxembourg Slovenia Australia * France Macedonia (The former Yugoslav Spain Austria Georgia Republic of) Sweden Azerbaijan Germany Malta Switzerland Belarus Greece Moldova (Republic of) Tajikistan Belgium Hungary Montenegro Turkey Bosnia and Herzegovina India Netherlands Turkmenistan Bulgaria Iran (Islamic Republic of) Norway Ukraine Canada Ireland Pakistan (Islamic Republic of) United Arab Emirates * China (The People’s Republic of) * Italy Poland United Kingdom Croatia Japan Portugal United States of America Cyprus Kazakhstan Romania Uzbekistan Czech Republic Kyrgyzstan Russian Federation 23 PARIS PACT PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS • Central Asian Regional Information and Coordination • International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) Centre (CARICC) • Interpol (INTERPOL) • Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) • North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) • Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) • Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) • Council of Europe (CE) • Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) • Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) • Southeast European Law Enforcement Center (SELEC) • Eurasian Group on Combating Money Laundering and • United Nations Aids Programme (UNAIDS) Terrorist Financing (EAG) * • United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) • European Monitoring Centre for
    [Show full text]
  • Asia, International Drug Trafficking, and Us-China Counternarcotics
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION CENTER FOR NORTHEAST ASIAN POLICY STUDIES ASIA, INTERNATIONAL DRUG TRAFFICKING, AND U.S.-CHINA COUNTERNARCOTICS COOPERATION Zhang Yong-an Associate Professor and Associate Dean, College of Liberal Arts; and Executive Director, David F. Musto Center for Drug Policy Studies Shanghai University February 2012 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington D.C. 20036-2188 Tel: (202)797-6000 Fax: (202)797-2485 http://www.brookings.edu 1. Introduction The end of the Cold War may have heralded an end to certain tensions, but among other unforeseen effects it also precipitated a significant increase in the flow of illegal drugs across traditional national boundaries. International travel has become easier in an increasingly borderless world, and―although international drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) have never respected national boundaries―newly globalized markets for drug production and exportation, along with changing patterns of consumption in some societies, have had an enormous impact on drug trafficking. In short, the global market for illicit drugs, and the capacity of providers to deliver to this market, is expanding inexorably around the world. What was once called “the American disease”1 has become a global one. 2 The international community first took an interest in the Asian drug trade at the beginning of the 20th century. The Shanghai Opium Commission in 1909 was the first attempt at regulating drug trade in the region, as countries including the United States, Great Britain, China, Japan, and Russia convened to discuss the growing trafficking of opium. Since then, numerous measures have been adopted by individual countries and collectively to curb the illegal drug trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2020 (E/INCB/2020/1) Is Supplemented by the Following Reports
    INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD Report 2020 EMBARGO Observe release date: Not to be published or broadcast before Thursday 25 March 2021, at 1100 hours (CET) UNITED NATIONS CAUTION Reports published by the International Narcotics Control Board for 2020 TheReport of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2020 (E/INCB/2020/1) is supplemented by the following reports: Celebrating 60 Years of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 and 50 Years of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 (E/INCB/2020/1/Supp.1) Narcotic Drugs: Estimated World Requirements for 2021 — Statistics for 2019 (E/INCB/2020/2) Psychotropic Substances: Statistics for 2019 — Assessments of Annual Medical and Scientific Requirements for Substances in Schedules II, III and IV of the Convention on Psychotropic Sub- stances of 1971 (E/INCB/2020/3) Precursors and Chemicals Frequently Used in the Illicit Manufacture of Narcotic Drugs and Psycho tropic Substances: Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2020 on the Implementation of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 (E/INCB/2020/4) The updated lists of substances under international control, comprising narcotic drugs, psycho­ tropic substances and substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, are contained in the latest editions of the annexes to the statistical forms (“Yellow List”, “Green List” and “Red List”), which are also issued by the Board. Contacting the International Narcotics Control Board The secretariat of the Board may be reached at the following address: Vienna International Centre Room E­1339 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Statutes and Regulations on Combating Illicit Trafficking of Narcotic Drugs
    CARICC’s Capacities in Assisting to Combat Transnational Drug-Related Crime A goal of establishment and primary objectives of CARICC Goal – to coordinate efforts of competent authorities of member- states in combating illicit drug trafficking. Primary objectives: ► to assist in organizing and coordinating joint international operations to combat transnational drug-related crime; ► collecting, storing, protecting, analyzing, and information sharing on drug- related crime. CARICC member-states shall determine National Coordinating and Competent Authorities, which interact with the Center. Observers with CARICC: Austria Afghanistan Great Britain Germany Italy Canada China Pakistan Romania U.S.A. Turkey Ukraine France Finland INTERPOL SELEC Example of CARICC’s assistance with coordinating a controlled delivery Initiator of the CUSTOMS SERVICE Opearation OF KYRGYZSTAN Coordinator of the Operation CUSTOMS SECURITY MINISTRY OF SERVICE OF SERVICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS RUSSIA UKRAINE OF UKRAINE Participants to the Operation A route and results of the controlled delivery Two citizens of Lithuania and four citizens of Latvia were arrested; the entire controlled cargo was seized - 2 kg of heroin. Москва Ирландия Киев The final destination point of drugs was identified. Бишкек Also, the involvement of the members of DTO in the smuggling of cigarettes, where also heroin was concealed, from Ukraine to Ireland has been indentified. Results of collection of information using CARICC capacities : With the assistance of CARICC, links of an organizer of the
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Rica, Haiti and Panama 99 the Cases of Costa Rica, Haiti and Panama
    Cha p ter 9: The cases of Costa Rica, Haiti and Panama 99 The cases of Costa Rica, Haiti and Panama MATION FOR IN Costa Rica C SI A B Population 4,870,000 Comparative increase (percentage variation 2008-2015) Territorial Extension 51,000 km2 Security State GDP Budget Budget GDP (US$) 56,908,000,000 Public Force Personnel 14,497* Security Budget (US$) 949,094,945 159% 126% 91% *Dependents of the Ministry of Security Principal Actors Security Budget as a Percentage of GDP, 2004-2015 1,000,000,000 Institutions Dependents 900,000,000 800,000,000 - Public Force (Civil Guard, Rural Guard, Coast 700,000,000 Guard, Aerial Surveilance, Drugs Control). 600,000,000 Ministry of Public -Police School. 500,000,000 Security - Directorate of Private Security Services. 400,000,000 300,000,000 - General Directorate of Armaments. 200,000,000 100,000,000 0 Ministry of - Directorate of Migration and Foreign Persons. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Interior and Police - Communal Development. Security Budget (current US$), 2004-2015 4.0% 3.5% - General Directorate of Social Adaption. Ministry of - General Directorate for the Promotion of 3.0% Justice and Peace and Citizen Coexistence. 2.5% Peace - National Youth Network for the prevention of violence. 2.0% - Violence Observatory. 1.5% - National Directorate of Alternative Confl ict Resolution. 1.0% - Commission for Regulating and Rating Public 0.5% Events. - Technical Secretariat of the National 0.0% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Commission for the Prevention of Violence and Promotion of Social Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting Drug Abuse, and Related Crime
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. "0 UNITED NATIONS SOCIAL DEFENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE· Publication No. 21 COMBATTING DRUG ABUSE, AND RELATED CRIME ". o FrateiU Palombi. Editori Rome, July 1984 . UNSDRI UNITED NATIONS SOCIAL DEFENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Publication No. 21 COMBATTING DRUG "ABUSE AND RELATED CRIME: Comparative research on the effectiveness o/socio-Iega! preventive and control measures in different countries on the interaction between criminal behaviour and drug abuse Funded by the UNITED NATIONS FUND FOR DRUG ABUSE CONTROL by Francesco Bruno M.D. ft~~i1l Fratelli Palombi Editori Rome, July 1984 97289 U.S. Department of Justlce National Institute of Justice This document has been reprodu~ed exaclly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Nallonai Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted,by • • Un~ted Nat~ons Soc~al Befence Research Inst~tute (UNSURT) to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduc!ion outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. Copyright © UNSDRI TshBeNUru8'ted Nations Social Defence Research Institute 1984 I 8 -7621-826-2 ' Extracts from this publication b d . condition that the source is indk:re/ repro uced wIthout authorization on TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword ............. K~.G·.~~.~.~: ...... :...... 3 Chapters . APR 3~ 1965 I. IntroductIon ............................... 7 II. The researchJ.l\. C~·tH iU '1'i!'O'N S' ......
    [Show full text]
  • Family Fun in Barton Food, Friendship & Fun for £8 a Night!
    www.ipa-uk.org Vol 55 No.4 2010 The magazine of the International Police Association, Section UK Family Fun in Barton Food, friendship & fun for £8 a night! Members took on the UK’s four highest peaks and returned to tell the tale An expedition to the Galapagos Islands with a few new friends How the Bond works “ The Holiday Property Bond has a flair The Bond invests, Police World after initial charges, The magazine of the International Police for finding perfect holiday locations. in properties and Association, Section UK securities. Properties Contents are booked for a no Not just sea and sun, but fascinating, profit ‘User Charge’ Editor Vol 55 No.4 2010 and Points issued with Lee Hemmings unforgettable places.” the Bond. There is a e-mail: [email protected] quarterly fee of around Sue Barker twenty-five pounds Deadline for article submission for Sportswoman, broadcaster and Bondholder since 2001 including VAT linked edition 2 is 28 February, 2011 Features to RPI, with all other Advertising management fees 4 Working on Your Behalf paid from securities. Elizabeth Howgill News from the National President Investment is from tel: (+44) 0115 981 3638 £4,000. You may e-mail: [email protected] 5 Cornish PC found in the corner encash after two years of a foreign field Stigliano, Tuscany at a value linked to General enquiries John Capp tells the story of a fallen hero that of the properties IPA, BSAC, Arthur Troop House, 6 Bryn gets hot and cold in Poland and securities but 1 Fox Road, you may not see a West Bridgford, Bryn Jones enjoys Polish police hospitality profit and may incur Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • DEATH PENALTY and DRUG CRIMES Detailed Factsheet 13Th World Day Against the Death Penalty
    DEATH PENALTY AND DRUG CRIMES Detailed Factsheet 13th World Day against the Death Penalty On 10 October 2015, the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty along with abolitionist activists worldwide will mark the 13th World Day against the Death Penalty by drawing attention to the death penalty for drug crimes. While opposing the death penalty in all circumstances, abolitionists are also committed to seeing existing international human rights standards implemented. Among these is the restriction of crimes punishable by death for the most serious crimes- intentional killing. Background Thirty-three countries and territories 1 provide the death penalty, at least in name, for drug smuggling, according to Harm Reduction International, a drug-focused NGO and a member of the World Coalition. Most are either in Asia or in the Middle East, and in most of them executions are extremely rare. In some the death penalty for drug crimes is just symbolic. Only in seven countries are drug offenders known to be routinely executed. This list has for some time included China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore . Indonesia is now included following a number of executions in 2015. 2 Throughout most of the 1980s and 1990s, the number of countries enacting capital drug laws rose dramatically. In 1979, about ten countries had the death penalty for drugs. By 1985, that number had risen to twenty-two and by 2000, to thirty-six. Today, the number has gone down to thirty-three countries. The reason this rise was so lamentable was that it corresponded with the remarkable global trend towards the abolition of the death penalty 3.
    [Show full text]