DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Bias? ‘Fake News’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Bias? ‘Fake News’ Media Bias? ‘Fake News’ (Or Are Political Supporters And the Smith’s and Jones’s of the U.S. Paranoid?) Arthur Solomon, Public Relations Consultant There is one issue that Republicans, Democrats, independents and people who have no interest in politics should be able to agree on: Today, the claim of media bias is led by President Trump, his “see no evil, hear no evil” press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the president’s surrogates, and the right and left wings talk show media. Another point that everyone, regardless of their political affiliations should be able to agree on is that technological advances have given a larger soapbox to allegations of media bias than ever before, but the original sin is ancient history. Students of history should know that claims of media bias in our country dates back before the founding of the United States. Let’s face it: When Thomas Paine wrote his famous pamphlets, “Common Sense” and “The American Crisis,” there were plenty of Americans who thought the author was biased against England. People knowledgeable about journalism, know that any reporter can write a lede and body of an article many ways without distorting any information and still be accused of bias by readers who don’t like the order of the included facts, even though the writer does not have any biases. Today, largely because of the yellow journalism practices of cable TV commentators and journalists, both on the right and the left, virtually every report is considered biased by someone. One example that I often relate happened when I had my first job in public relations. It was with a Republican PR firm and I worked on local, state and presidential campaigns in the days when conservative Democrats controlled Congress, (now controlled by extremist” hear no evil, see no evil, do evil” right wing Republicans, in my admitted biased opinion.) It was in the closing days of a tight presidential election when someone almost foaming from his mouth came running in with a newspaper that had a picture of the Pope blessing a crowd. Beneath the photo was another picture and story of the Democratic candidate. “Look at this, the Pope is blessing the Democrat. You have to do something,” he shouted to the PR staff. Of course, there was nothing we could do, we explained. Moreover, we said, the newspaper in question was a strong supporter of Republican candidates; its first page had considerably more positive stories about all the GOP candidates. And the opinion columnists and editorial writers were constantly writing columns praising GOP candidates and attacking the Democrats. (Conclusion: Bias was in the eyes of this individual.) But bias is not always an illusion – especially in political journalism. On cable TV, it’s easy to recognize bias. (An easy way to determine bias is to hear the commentary of Fox TV opinion commentators and compare what they say to Fox’s hard news reporters. Then you decide what’s fair and balanced.) In print journalism, it can be more difficult for readers to decipher. Below are several facets of print journalism that cause readers to claim bias: The placement of stories: Bias accusers believe that negative stories regarding their candidates are placed on page one while negative articles about candidates they dislike are buried on page 34. Assignment of stories: Bias accusers believe reporters are only assigned to look for negative stories about candidates the accusers prefer. Length of stories: The length of stories, not the news value in them, is a sign of bias by accusers. Quotes: Always a sore point by people who see bias. Who was quoted, how long was the quote and the placement of it in a story are questioned. But the use of photos and headlines in hard news stories are two of the easiest ways to determine bias in journalism. Photos: Bias accusers believe that the determining factor of which pictures are used shows the bias of the selecting editor. In this case, they may be correct. (The advent of color photographs in newspapers added a new claim by people who see bias in every editorial decision. Pictures of candidates in color are obviously selected to show who the editors prefer, the bias ghost hunters feel.) Headlines, Pictures and Stories: The way they are written is a sure sign of bias, according to some people, including me. An example is a New York Times story on October 13, 2018, with a four column headline reading, “Israeli Forces Kill 7 Palestinians in Gaza Border Clashes.” A pull-out read,” A death toll of about 200 Palestinians in six months of protests.” A few days later, on October 18, a Times story was headlined, “After Rocket Hits House, Israel Strikes Gaza Sites.” That shows there isn’t any bias, because both Israel and the Palestinians were blamed in separate stories, a person might say. Not so fast, Charley. The second story had a three column picture of a wailing Palestinian mother whose child was killed during the Israeli response. (If the headline and pull-out doesn’t provide a biased opinion in the initial story, which could have been written and headlined many different ways, and a three column picture of the distraught Palestinian family in the second article does not show bias I don’t know what does.) Then, on October 30, the Times ran a story titled “Thousands Mourn 3 Palestinian Boys Killed in Israeli Airstrike.” This story was accompanied by a huge five column picture showing the three victims. Another image was captioned, “Palestinian protesters in Gaza on Monday protected their faces from tear gas fired by Israeli troops.” The problem with this picture was that no where could you see the tear gassing described in the picture. It wasn’t until the fourteenth paragraph that the story said, “Gaza militants fired nearly 40 rockets into southern Israel between Friday night and Saturday morning, and the Israeli Air Force retaliated with strikes on more than 90 unmanned militant targets in Gaza.” The following graph detailed rocket fire, incendiary balloons and mortar fire from Gaza causing hundreds of fires in Israel. Another example that provides a good case for people claiming that the New York Times is biased in its coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian situation: In its November 12, 2018, edition, a story was headlined, “Deadly Israeli Gaza Raid Threatens New Cease-Fire.” The article was accompanied with a photo captioned, in part, “An Israeli tank in October.” A few days ago, in its April 29, 2019, paper, the New York Times ran a story headlined, “Times Apologizes for Printing Anti-Semitic Cartoon,” which was widely condemned internationally. This was followed by several days of mea culpa articles and the Times publisher saying the paper will update its bias training to include anti-Semitism. (Question: Did the publisher just wake up from a Rip Van Winkle snooze to acknowledge the rise of anti-Semitism?) The Times has long been accused of being biased against Israel in its reporting. (Media bias, of course, is subjective, especially when the subject is politics). On Holocaust Remembrance Day, Ron Dermer, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, called the paper “a cesspool of hostility” While I disagree with Dermer’s choice of words, I do think the entire scope of how the Times covers the Israeli-Palestinian situation deserves to be reviewed by the Times publisher. Also, anti Israel bias by CNN was evident on Saturday. When reporting about rockets from Gaza being launched into Israel, followed by an Israeli response, one of the CNN headlines said, “Baby & Mother killed in Israeli Airstrike.” A more accurate headline would have been, “Israeli responds to rocket attacks from Gaza.” Burying the news: This tactic is perhaps the one most used and it is largely inefficient. An example of what I consider overt media bias resulted from a major report saying that global warming will result in an economic loss in the United States as well as threatening the planet. The report, which contradicted the political position of President Trump, received major coverage in prominent print pubs and on cable television, the exception being Fox, which has turned into a public relations agency for the president. The White House attempted to lessen its media coverage by releasing the report on Black Friday, resulting in media reporting saying the president was trying to reduce coverage. While most cases of bias in reporting from major newspapers are unfounded, bias does exist, especially when reporting on hot button issues, like the ones described above and below. (In some cases the way articles are headlined, written and presented with pictures are deliberately biased. But in most cases, I believe, bias is in the eyes of the readers because they don’t like stories they disagree with, even if they are 100% accurate.) Any fair-minded person who pays even scant attention to the political scene knows that there is bias in the coverage of President Trump by the so-called mainstream media (as there is bias against Democrats by the right wing media). But the question is which came first? Trump claiming that the mainstream media was treating him unfairly, or the media responding to his claims of “fake news.” As a close observer of the political news scene and the once daily White House press briefings, I side with the media, which riled Trump and his spokespeople by consistently correcting their false claims. (But I also believe that many of the TV pundits that continually attack Trump secretly wish that he’ll be reelected next year because if he is defeated they’ll have nothing to talk about but hurricanes, killings and fires.) In our business, I’ve heard many practitioners, whose job it is to place stories or gain TV interviews, claim that the reporters must have a bias because “my pitches” are always turned down.” It’s true that some reporters look more favorably on some PR people than others.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-2018 "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House Carol Pauli Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Communications Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, and the President/ Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Carol Pauli, "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House, 33 Ohio St. J. Disp. Resol. 397 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1290 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House CAROL PAULI* I. INTRODUCTION II. WHITE HOUSE PRESS BRIEFINGS A. PressBriefing as Negotiation B. The Parties and Their Power, Generally C. Ghosts in the Briefing Room D. Zone ofPossibleAgreement III. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION A. The Parties and Their Power, 2016-2017 B. White House Moves 1. NOVEMBER 22: POSITIONING 2. JANUARY 11: PLAYING TIT-FOR-TAT a. Tit-for-Tat b. Warning or Threat 3. JANUARY 21: ANCHORING AND MORE a. Anchoring b. Testing the Press c. Taunting the Press d. Changingthe GroundRules e. Devaluing the Offer f. MisdirectingPress Attention * Associate Professor, Texas A&M University School of Law; J.D. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fragility of the Free American Press
    Copyright 2017 by RonNell Andersen Jones and Sonja R. West Vol. 112 Northwestern University Law Review THE FRAGILITY OF THE FREE AMERICAN PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones & Sonja R. West ABSTRACT—President Donald Trump has faced criticism for attacking the press and for abandoning longstanding traditions of accommodating and respecting it. This Essay argues that the national discussion spurred by Trump’s treatment of the press has fallen short of capturing the true seriousness of the situation. Trump’s assault on the custom of press accommodation follows a generation-long collapse of other major press protections. In order to fully understand the critical juncture at which American press freedom now stands, we must expand the discussion beyond talk of a rogue president’s aberrant attacks on the press and consider the increasingly fragile edifice on which the American free press sits. This is because the kind of press we value and need in the United States—one that is free, independent, and democracy-enhancing—does not just occur naturally. Nor is it protected by a single, robust constitutional right. Rather, it is supported by a number of legal and nonlegal pillars, such as the institutional media’s relative financial strength, the goodwill of the public, a mutually dependent relationship with government officials, and the backing of sympathetic judges. Each of these supports has weakened substantially in recent years, leaving the one remaining pillar of tradition and custom to bear more of the weight. Contrary to widespread belief, our concern should not be that Trump might be taking the first step toward crippling the power of the free press, but rather that he might be taking the final step in a process that has long been underway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internationalisation of Bangladeshi Military Intervention in 2007
    The Internationalisation Of Bangladeshi Military Intervention In 2007 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury 17 November, 2014 Countercurrents.org International relations have major role in governing different countries, particularly, in this era of globalisation. It is more evident in developing countries’ politics. Moreover, extra-constitutional government needs special support and attention from foreign powers for its legitimacy. Bangladesh witnessed military-backed government’s parley to gain international support during its tenure of 2007-08 period. The military rule contacted relevant international powerful quarters in order to receive their supports. Appointment of Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed as the head of the government was nothing but first signal of military administration to show that they have international connections. On the one hand the military’s priority was Dr. Muhammad Yunus, and on the other hand, Yunus’s choice was different. He was more interested to be the head of the state or the President of the country. Instead of joining as head of the government or Chief Adviser during the army-backed regime Yunus made his all out efforts to start with a journey for his new political front ‘Nagarik Shakti’. However, that move has failed as people went against the military’s anti-political behaviour. Role of PR in UN Initially, Permanent Representative of Bangladesh in United Nations Dr. Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury was aspirant for the position of the Chief Adviser. After completion of his regular appointment in the United Nations as Permanent Representative, Iftekhar was discharging his contractual assignment in the same position in New York. In fact, he was the unofficial adviser of Army Chief Moeen Uddin Ahmed prior to 11 January 2007 military coup.
    [Show full text]
  • What Journalists Think of Rating Scales in Fact-Checking a Project Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate
    World of trade-offs: what journalists think of rating scales in fact-checking A Project presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by YUE YU Professor Tom Warhover, Committee Chair Professor Scott Swafford Professor Alison Young December 2019 i © Copyright by Yue Yu 2019 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my parents, Shunxin Yu and Ying Wang, for supporting my decision coming to the U.S. for my dream in journalism two and a half years ago. My mother, who raised me by herself for more than a decade and whose yearlong salary could barely cover my tuition for the first semester, had always wanted me to stay close to home but nonetheless chose to support me and understand my career endeavors. My father, who always encouraged me to push through during the hardest times, has been a great mentor and friend for the past two years. Speaking of mentorship, I’d like to further thank all my professors at the University of Missouri who taught me invaluable skills and helped me become a better journalist. These professors include but are not limited to: Scott Swafford, Mark Horvit, David Herzog, Tom Warhover, Katherine Reed, Brett Johnson, Liz Brixey, Mike Jenner and Jeanne Abbott. I would like to express my special gratitude to Scott Swafford, who nurtured and guided me over the years with his patience and kindness; to Mark Horvit, who connected me to a wide range of opportunities and always challenged me to dig deeper, and to Tom Warhover, who offered me sharp and detailed comments on my research project.
    [Show full text]
  • ENEMY CONSTRUCTION and the PRESS Ronnell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun†
    ENEMY CONSTRUCTION AND THE PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun† ABSTRACT When the President of the United States declared recently that the press is “the enemy,” it set off a firestorm of criticism from defenders of the institutional media and champions of the press’s role in the democracy. But even these Trump critics have mostly failed to appreciate the wider ramifications of the President’s narrative choice. Our earlier work describes the process of governmental “enemy construction,” by which officials use war rhetoric and other signaling behaviors to convey that a person or institution is not merely an institution that, although wholly legitimate, has engaged in behaviors that are disappointing or disapproved, but instead an illegitimate “enemy” triggering a state of Schmittian exceptionalism and justifying the compromise of ordinarily recognized liberties. The Trump administration, with a rhetoric that began during the campaign and burgeoned in the earliest days of Donald Trump’s presidency, has engaged in enemy construction of the press, and the risks that accompany that categorization are grave. This article examines the fuller components of that enemy construction, beyond the overt use of the label. It offers insights into the social, technological, legal, and political realities that make the press ripe for enemy construction in a way that would have been unthinkable a generation ago. It then explores the potential motivations for and consequences of enemy construction. We argue that enemy construction is particularly alarming when the press, rather than some other entity, is the constructed enemy. Undercutting the watchdog, educator, and proxy functions of the press through enemy construction leaves the administration more capable of delegitimizing other institutions and constructing other enemies—including the judiciary, the intelligence community, immigrants, and members of certain races or religions—because the viability and traction of counter-narrative is so greatly diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Tension Between Politics and the Media
    My Vision No.31 2017.9 About this Issue Examining Tension between Politics and the Media The Divisions among the Public at the Root of “Post-truth” Politics Oxford University Press chose “post-truth” as its Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year for 2016. “Post-truth” was defined as an adjective “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” “Post-truth”had existed as a term for some time prior to its Masaki Taniguchi selection as word of the year, but it was the British referendum NIRA Executive Vice President, regarding the nation’s withdrawal from the European Union Professor of Political Science, Graduate Schools for Law and and the US presidential election in 2016 that brought the term Politics, The University of into wider usage. Tokyo Prior to the British referendum, the pro-Brexit side employed the slogan “We send the EU £350 million a week. Let’s fund our NHS instead.” The BBC reported that the British government’s expenditure on the EU was actually £160 million per week, representing a little more than 1% of government expenditure. However, this fact was only vaguely apprehended. In the US, the Trump administration is still frequently the subject of controversy as a result of inaccurate or inappropriate statements. The benchmark for these was provided by the Counselor to the President in responding to queries regarding the veracity of the official claim that the crowd attending Trump’s inauguration was the largest ever
    [Show full text]
  • Business and Politics in the Muslim World Asia Reports
    BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD ASIA REPORTS First Quarter 2009 Volume: 2. No.-1 Reports of February, 2009 Table of contents Reports for the month of February Week-1 February 04, 2009 03 Week-2 February 11, 2009 336 Country profiles Sources 2 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD ASIA REPORT February 04, 2009 Nadia Tasleem: Report on Asia 04 Ashia Rehman: Report on Fertile Crescent 20 Madiha Kaukub: Report on GCC 61 Tatheer Zehra: Report on South East Asia 82 Ghashia Kayani: Report on South Asia 145 Sadia Khanum: Report on India 318 3 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD SOUTH & EAST ASIA and GCC & Fertile Crescent Nadia Tasleem Weekly Report from 26 December 2008 to 30 January 2009 Presentation: 4 February 2009 This report is based on the review of news items focusing on political, economic, social and geo‐ strategic developments in various regions namely; South Asia, East Asia, GCC and Fertile Crescent from 26 December 2008 to 30 January 2009 as have been collected by interns. Summary South Asia: Political Front: After winning 9th Parliamentary elections in Bangladesh, 258 members from winning coalition sworn in as MPs on 3 January 2009; three days later, leader of Awami League Sheikh Haseena Wajid took oath as new Premier of Bangladesh on 6 January 2009. Later on first Parliamentary session was held on 25 January that was not being attended by opposition party i.e. BNP. Besides that Upazila elections finally held on 22 January amidst few incidents of clashes. Though election in six upazila got cancelled however took place successfully in rest of the 475 upazila areas under strong security arrangements as almost 5 lakh security persons were deployed all across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Facts’: How the Fake News Pandemic Is Killing Media As We Know It
    BBC School Report ‘ALTERNATIVE FACTS’: HOW THE FAKE NEWS PANDEMIC IS KILLING MEDIA AS WE KNOW IT On January 22nd, 2017, the controversial days Kellyanne Conway was found discussing the term ‘alternative facts’ was born. Coined by make-believe massacre in two other interviews Kellyanne Conway, the Counselor to United just days beforehand. Whether Conway was simp- States, it was used to defend the White ly lying or indeed did mix up her words is un- known, however both are equally alarming, dis- House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s blatantly playing either a deceitful sentiment or a lack of false claim about the attendance to Trump’s willingness to double check on what they are presidential inauguration. It was just one preaching. more battle in the apparent war against the truth. However, as fun as it is to witch-hunt one of the most powerful authorities in the world for their Conway’s ‘alternative fact’ phrase rapidly went flaws and blunders, the Trump administration isn’t viral across social media, triggering many, includ- the only one taking advantage of ‘alternative ing New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, facts’. Whether in the form of blasphemous sub- to dub the expression Orwellian in reference to terfuge, twisted truths or ridiculous hyperbole, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, a classic hoax and fake news has always existed. Even in 1st novel which discusses a dystopian future con- century Rome, Octavian spread misinformation trolled by a manipulative, totalitarian state. Lies about Marc Anthony to convince the Empire that and twisted truth appear to be almost epidemic in he held anti-Roman sentiment; however, in the Donald Trump’s America: askew unemployment internet era, the issue of fake news is exponential- statistics, fairy-tale terrorist attacks and fictional ly evolving to be worse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Governance
    Crisis in Governance Crisis in Governance: Military Rule in Bangladesh during 2007–2008 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury Crisis in Governance: Military Rule in Bangladesh during 2007–2008 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3642-4 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3642-5 To the late editor Alhaj Azizur Rahman Chowdhury, my late father, Ratnagarva Sharifa Aziz Chowdhury, my late mother and Bangladesh, my country. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................... xi Foreword by Justice Mohammed Abdur Rouf ......................................... xiii Foreword by Dr Charles Che Fonchingong .............................................. xvi Preface .................................................................................................... xviii Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xxiii Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linda Qiu and Snopes Fact-Checker Bethania Palma
    EVERYONE HATES THE REFEREE: HOW FACT-CHECKERS MITIGATE A PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF BIAS A project presented to the faculty of the graduate school at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Journalism by ALLISON COLBURN Committee: Katherine Reed (chair) Jennifer Rowe Barbara Cochran December 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank Katherine Reed for helping me take my abstract ideas into something concrete and researchable. She was an essential guide when I was struggling to come up with my project proposal. I also want to thank Jennifer Rowe for her encouragement and for turning my “judgements” into “judgments.” And Barbara Cochran has given me a great deal of support during my project’s professional component. I have gained so much from having three intelligent, successful and strong-willed women on my committee. Last, I would be remiss to forget to acknowledge the Missouri School of Journalism. The disillusioned student who started with the school in fall 2015 is a better, more confident version of herself today. ii" TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments.................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1. Introduction..............................................................................................3 2. Activity Log.............................................................................................7 3. Evaluation .............................................................................................17 4. Physical Evidence .................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Well and Doing Good
    John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series Doing Well and Doing Good Thomas E. Patterson December 2000 RWP01-001 The views expressed in the KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. All works posted here are owned and copyrighted by the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. DOING WELL AND DOING GOOD: How Soft News and Critical Journalism Are Shrinking the News Audience and Weakening Democracy– And What News Outlets Can Do About It by Thomas E. Patterson Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Research sponsored by a grant from the Smith-Richardson Foundation. © Copyright 2000, President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. The Joan Shorenstein Center PRESS • POLITICS • PUBLIC POLICY • Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government INTRODUCTION interest in politics and in news, and that will strengthen the press’s watchdog role. The news has changed greatly during the past two decades. In response to the intensely These arguments are based on a two-year competitive media environment created by cable news study that was undertaken with the support news and entertainment, news outlets have of a grant from the Smith-Richardson softened their coverage. Their news has also Foundation. We conducted national surveys become increasingly critical in tone. designed to measure Americans’ news habits, interests, and preferences. Our research also Soft news and critical journalism have not includes an analysis of 5331 news stories, stopped the decline in news audiences.
    [Show full text]