DOCSLIB.ORG

Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2012 Lucas Graves All rights reserved ABSTRACT Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves This dissertation studies the new class of political fact-checkers, journalists who specialize in assessing the truth of public claims — and who, it is argued, constitute a professional reform movement reaching to the center of the elite US news media. In less than a decade this emergent genre of news has become a basic feature of political coverage. It figures prominently in national debates and commands the direct attention of elite political actors, who respond publicly to the fact-checkers and dedicate staff to dealing with them, especially during electoral campaigns. This study locates fact-checking in a wider practice of “annotative journalism,” with precursors in the muckraking tradition in American news, which has come into flower in an online media environment characterized by promiscuous borrowing and annotation. Participant observation and content analysis are used together to examine the day-to-day work of the news organizations leading the fact-checking movement. This approach documents the specific and forceful critique of conventional journalistic practice which the fact-checkers enact in their newswork routines and in their public and private discourse. Fact-checkers are a species of practical epistemologists, who seek to reform and thus to preserve the objectivity norm in American journalism, even as their daily work runs up against the limits of objective factual analysis. In politics, they acknowledge, “facts can be subjective.” Fact-checkers are also active participants in an emerging news ecosystem in which stories develop, and authority is constructed, in patterns of citation and annotation across discursive networks of media and political actors. This study demonstrates how attention to these media-political networks subtly informs and constrains the work of producing objective assessments of factual claims. And it suggests that the objective status of the fact-checkers themselves can be seen as a function of their position in media-political networks, reproduced in formal and informal partnerships and, most immediately, in the pattern of outlets which cite and quote and link to them. This perspective helps to account for the surprising limits of the political critique offered by professional fact-checkers, who argue for a more honest, fearless journalism but carefully avoid the largest and most controversial political conclusions that emerge from their own work. In seeking to redefine objective practice for a changed media environment, the new genre of fact-checking underscores the essentially defensive nature of what has been called the “strategic ritual” of journalistic objectivity. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction … p. 1 Chapter 1 - From Free Software to Fact-Checking … p. 26 Chapter 2 - Annotative Journalism and the Practice of Objectivity… p. 70 Chapter 3 - The Elite Fact-Checkers: Finding Facts to Check … p. 119 Chapter 4 - The Elite Fact-Checkers: Deciding What’s True … p. 169 Chapter 5 - The Elite Fact-Checkers: Making a Difference … p. 226 Conclusion … p. 290 Bibliography… p. 295 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A project like this incurs many debts before it’s done. This dissertation could not have come together, first of all, without the generosity and transparency of the fact-checkers who gave me a window onto their professional world. I’m grateful to Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post, to Brooks Jackson and Eugene Kiely of FactCheck.org, and to everybody at the national bureau of PolitiFact — most of all Bill Adair, whose initial “yes” set all of this in motion. This manuscript benefited immeasurably from the comments, large and small, of my dissertation committee: Todd Gitlin, Victor Pickard, Stephen Reese, Michael Schudson, and David Stark. I return to the discussion at our midsummer meeting over and over as I think about carrying this work forward. I owe a profound thanks to two committee members who have guided and inspired me at Columbia in a way I hope one day to emulate. David Stark bridges intellectual worlds like few others in or out of academia, and never fails to ask the question that casts everything in a new light; his interest, advice and support have been invaluable. Michael Schudson has been the ideal advisor, patient and wise, always knowing more than he says and saying precisely what’s needed. I hope this dissertation reveals the influence of his thoughtful and respectful scholarship, which I admire more every time I return to it. I received valuable support and feedback from David Stark’s CODES seminar and from many friends in the Sociology department, which became a second home intellectually and actually; thanks especially to Monique Girard, Elena Krumova, Olivia Nicol, Alix Rule, and Josh Whitford, a constant ally to graduate students. The Mellon Graduate Fellows program at ISERP provided the best possible environment to finally put pen to paper for me and many others, due ii in no small part to the efforts of Bill McAllister and Bethany Kell. James Chappel, Seema Golestaneh, Seung-Jeung Kim and Sonali Thakkar were valued companions in our subterranean lair. The New America Foundation supported this research at a crucial stage, and hosted the fact- checking conference that figures so prominently in the final chapters. Many people and organizations contributed to that conference and to the research agenda that grew out of it, which continues today. I’m grateful in particular for the efforts of Steve Coll, Kate Fink, John Kelly, Brendan Nyhan, Lori McGlinchey, and most of all my friend and colleague Tom Glaisyer, who puts people together like no one I’ve ever met. My friend Rasmus objects to the word “community,” but he would agree we’ve had a fine one in the small PhD program in Columbia’s journalism school. On our remarkable faculty, each of whom has helped and influenced me, I owe special thanks to Andie Tucher and Frank Moretti, whose support and confidence made the difference when it counted. Herb Gans, whose research erected the platform for this and so many other studies of journalists at work, offered penetrating comments on this manuscript. Among many fellow PhD seekers who shared and shaped my long arc in our program, Chris Anderson, Jonah Bossewitch, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Ruth Palmer, Soomin Seo, Julia Sonnevend, and Madiha Tahir have all been indispensable allies and friends. I owe special thanks, and many quarters, to my neighbor, colleague and co-conspirator Joost van Dreunen. Many others have contributed ideas, criticism and material support to this project at various stages. Peter Asaro, Chris Anderson, Katherine Brown, Biella Coleman, Christina Dunbar- Hester, Ruth Palmer, Laura Portwood-Stacer, Annie Rudd and Julia Sonnevend all read drafts of iii early chapters. Olivier Sylvain shouldered more than his share of a side project neither of us had the time for. Jack Bratich offered many encouraging words, and drinks. David McNally helped to turn me into a coder, for a summer at least. Rich Garella, Omar Serageldin, and Ranjit Singh were uncommonly gracious hosts during frequent trips to Philadelphia and Washington, DC. Ingrid Erickson lent me her beautiful Harlem aerie for the mad final weeks. And the deadline would surely have been missed if not for the editing and illustration talents, and limitless patience, of my mother Janice Olson. I’ve been lucky to have the constant support and indulgence of an extended family in New York — Janice, David, Jessie, Alan — who heard more dodges and evasions than any of us can remember to the question, “So what’s your dissertation about?” Finally, I owe more than I can possibly say to the person who bridges all of these worlds, my best friend, constant interlocutor and finest role model, whose subtly totalizing worldview informed this project at every stage. Thank you, Christina, for showing me how to do this. iv 1 Introduction This dissertation is about the fact-checking movement — what a journalism review has called “The Fact-Checking Explosion” — in American news.1 It examines a set of emergent practices, and an accompanying journalistic discourse, which have coalesced into a reform movement reaching to the center of the elite news media. The largest question this project tries to address is this: How has the Internet — not as a technological force, but as a complex of affordances rendered meaningful by new practices, norms, and organizations — transformed journalistic work and the world of news production? The new actors and behaviors studied here will also, I think, reveal deeper currents in the practice of journalism and its defining professional norm. Reform movements have complicated beginnings. As we shall see, professional fact-checkers trace the roots of their new genre to a style of reporting that emerged, in fits and starts, two decades ago. But a fair date for the birth of fact-checking as it is practiced today is December 9, 2001. As discussed in the next chapter, on that day just two months after September 11 an irate conservative blogger issued what would later be seen as a call to arms against the mainstream news media: It's 2001, and we can Fact Check your ass.2 The phrase quickly became part of Internet lore. It would be repeated thousands of times as a kind of shorthand for the animosity between blogger-journalists and their professional counterparts. As a New Yorker piece on the 1 Carey Spivak, “The Fact-Checking Explosion,” American Journalism Review, December/January 2011. 2 Ken Layne, “More Funny Fisk, from Sept.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marketing Hospitality Web Sites Galen Collins Northern Arizona University, Null@Nau.Edu
    Hospitality Review Volume 20 Article 2 Issue 1 Hospitality Review Volume 20/Issue 1 January 2002 Marketing Hospitality Web Sites Galen Collins Northern Arizona University, null@nau.edu Jamie Murphy The University of Western Australia, null@uwa.edu.au Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/hospitalityreview Part of the E-Commerce Commons, Hospitality Administration and Management Commons, and the Management Information Systems Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Galen and Murphy, Jamie (2002) "Marketing Hospitality Web Sites," Hospitality Review: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/hospitalityreview/vol20/iss1/2 This work is brought to you for free and open access by FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hospitality Review by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu. Marketing Hospitality Web Sites Abstract The ew b has emerged as a potent business channel. Yet many hospitality websites are irrelevant in a new and cluttered technical world. Knowing how to promote and advertise a website and capitalizing on available resources are the keys to success. The uthora s lay out a marketing plan for increasing hospitality website traffic. Keywords Internet, Hospitality, Galen Collins This article is available in Hospitality Review: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/hospitalityreview/vol20/iss1/2 Marketing hospitality websites by Galen Collins and Jamie Murphy The web has emwedas a potentbusiness created wonderful websites, yet like channel. kt many hospitaliry websites are a wonderful and irrelevant in a new and cluttered technld world, how promote andadver- establishment, the acid test is visi- tise a website and capitalizing on available tors that stay and spend.
    [Show full text]
  • Betsy Mccaughey, Ph.D. Phone: (212) 534-3047 • E-Mail: Betsy@Hospitalinfection.Org
    Betsy McCaughey, Ph.D. Phone: (212) 534-3047 • E-Mail: Betsy@hospitalinfection.org Dr. McCaughey is a health policy expert and former Lt. Governor of New York State. In 2004, she founded the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths (www.hospitalinfection.org), a nationwide educational campaign to stop hospital-acquired infections. She serves as the Chairman of the organization. In five years, RID has made hospital infections a major public issue, provided compelling evidence that preventing infection improves hospital profitability as well as saving lives, and won legislation in over 25 states for public reporting of infection rates. RID has become synonymous with patient safety and clean hospital care. Dr. McCaughey’s research on how to prevent infection deaths has been featured on Good Morning America, the CBS Morning Show, ABC’s 20/20, and many other national programs. She has appeared on Fox News Network’s Hannity & Colmes, The O’Reilly Factor, CNN’s Talk Back Live, and numerous radio programs. Dr. McCaughey is the author of over one hundred scholarly and popular articles on health policy, infection, medical innovation, the economics of aging, and Medicare. Her writings have appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, New Republic, Policy Review, Forbes Magazine, New York Law Journal, Los Angeles Times, U.S. News & World Report, and many other national publications. Her 1994 analysis of the dangers of the Clinton health plan in the New Republic won a National Magazine Award for the best article in the nation on public policy. Her article on the dangers of “Dumbing Down Medical Care” won the National Media Award from the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
    [Show full text]
  • They Hate US for Our War Crimes: an Argument for US Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights
    UIC Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 4 2019 They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the ost-HumanP Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) Michael Drake Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Michael Drake, They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol52/iss4/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact repository@jmls.edu. THEY HATE U.S. FOR OUR WAR CRIMES: AN ARGUMENT FOR U.S. RATIFICATION OF THE ROME STATUTE IN LIGHT OF THE POST-HUMAN RIGHTS ERA MICHAEL DRAKE* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1012 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................ 1014 A. Continental Disparities ......................................... 1014 1. The International Process in Africa ............... 1014 2. The National Process in the United States of America ............................................................ 1016 B. The Rome Statute, the ICC, and the United States ................................................................................. 1020 1. An International Court to Hold National Leaders Accountable ...................................................... 1020 2. The Aims and Objectives of the Rome Statute .......................................................................... 1021 3. African Bias and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15
    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 msteger@skattorney.com Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Directory
    D DIRECTORY Member Directory ABOUT THE MOBILE MARKETING ASSOCIATION (MMA) Mobile Marketing Association Member Directory, Spring 2008 The Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) is the premier global non- profit association established to lead the development of mobile Mobile Marketing Association marketing and its associated technologies. The MMA is an action- 1670 Broadway, Suite 850 Denver, CO 80202 oriented organization designed to clear obstacles to market USA development, establish guidelines and best practices for sustainable growth, and evangelize the mobile channel for use by brands and Telephone: +1.303.415.2550 content providers. With more than 600 member companies, Fax: +1.303.499.0952 representing over forty-two countries, our members include agencies, mma@mmaglobal.com advertisers, handheld device manufacturers, carriers and operators, retailers, software providers and service providers, as well as any company focused on the potential of marketing via mobile devices. *Updated as of 31 May, 2008 The MMA is a global organization with regional branches in Asia Pacific (APAC); Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA); Latin America (LATAM); and North America (NA). About the MMA Member Directory The MMA Member Directory is the mobile marketing industry’s foremost resource for information on leading companies in the mobile space. It includes MMA members at the global, regional, and national levels. An online version of the Directory is available at http://www.mmaglobal.com/memberdirectory.pdf. The Directory is published twice each year. The materials found in this document are owned, held, or licensed by the Mobile Marketing Association and are available for personal, non-commercial, and educational use, provided that ownership of the materials is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Nate Silver's Punditry Revolution
    Nate Silver’s punditry revolution By Cameron S. Brown Jerusalem Post, November 6, 2012 Whether or not US President Barack Obama is re-elected will not just determine the future of politics, it is also likely to influence the future of political punditry as well. The media has been following the US elections with two very, very different narratives. Apart from the obvious – i.e. Democrat versus Republican—opinions were divided between those who thought the race was way too close to call and those who predicted with great confidence that Obama was far more likely to win. Most of the media—including the most respected outlets—continued with the traditional focus on the national polls. Even when state-level polls were cited, analyses often cherry-picked the more interesting polls or ones that suited the specific bias of the pundit. While on occasion this analysis has given one candidate or another an advantage of several points, more often than not they declared the race “neck-and-neck,” and well within any given poll’s margin of error. The other narrative was born out of a new, far more sophisticated political analysis than has ever been seen in the mass media before. Nate Silver, a young statistician who was part of the “Moneyball” revolution in professional baseball, has brought that same methodological rigor to political analysis. The result is that Silver is leading a second revolution: this time in the world of political punditry. In his blog, “Five Thirty-Eight,” (picked up this year by the New York Times), Silver put his first emphasis on the fact that whoever wins the national vote does not actually determine who wins the presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line
    Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line: DATE Event Description 4th Origins of ice cream being made… China, Persians faloodeh, Nero in Rome (62 AD) century BC 15th Spanish, Italian royalty and wealthy store mountain ice in pits for summer use Century 16th Ice Cream breakthrough is when Italians learn to make ice by immersing a bucket of Century water in snow and adding potassium nitrate… later just use common salt. 1700s Jefferson and Washington In US serving ice cream 1776 First US ice cream parlor in New York City and American colonists first to use the term ice cream 1832 Augustus Jackson (Black) in Philadelphia adds salt to lower temp. White House chef to a catering business. 1846 Nancy Johnson patented hand-crank freezer 1848 William Young patents an ice cream freezer 1851 Jacob Fussell in Seven Valleys, Pennsylvania established the first large-scale commercial ice cream plant… moved to Baltimore 1870s Development of Industrial Refrigeration by German engineer Carl von Linde 1904 Walk away edible cone at the St Louis World’s Fair 1906 William Dreyer made his first frozen dessert to celebrate his German ship's arrival in America. Made Ice Cream in New York then moves to Northern California began 20 year apprenticeship with ice cream makers like National Ice Cream Company and Peerless Ice Cream. 1921 Dreyer opens own ice creamery in Visalia and one first prize at Pacific Slope Dairy Show. 1920s – Dreyer taught ice cream courses at the University of California and served as an officer in 1930s the California Dairy Industries Association.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; WILLIAM SHINE, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief of Staff to the Case No. President of the United States; SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, in her official capacity as Press Secretary to the President of the United States; the UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; RANDOLPH D. ALLES, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Secret Service; and JOHN DOE, Secret Service Agent, Defendants. DECLARATION OF THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I, THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., hereby declare under penalty of perjury the following: 1. My name is Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. I am a partner with the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a member of the bar of this Court. I represent Plaintiffs Cable News Network, Inc. (“CNN”) and Abilio James Acosta (“Jim Acosta”) in the above-captioned action. By virtue of my direct involvement in this matter, I have personal knowledge of the content of this declaration, and I could and would competently testify to the truth of the matters stated herein. 2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an article by Brian Stelter of CNN entitled “Donald Trump: I won’t kick reporters out of White House press briefing room,” dated June 14, 2016, available at https://money.cnn.com/2016/06/14/media/donald-trump-press- credentials-access/index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, V
    Case 1:18-cv-02610-TJK Document 6-1 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; WILLIAM SHINE, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Case No. 1:18-cv-02610-TJK of Staff to the President of the United States; SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, in her official capacity as Press Secretary to the President of the United States; the UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; RANDOLPH ALLES, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Secret Service; and JOHN DOE, Secret Service Agent, in his official capacity, Defendants. BRIEF OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 1:18-cv-02610-TJK Document 6-1 Filed 11/13/18 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Jihadist Propaganda on Social Networks Adam
    Rise of Jihadist Propaganda 1 The Rise of Jihadist Propaganda on Social Networks Adam Badawy, Emilio Ferrara* University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute *Corresponding author: emiliofe@usc.edu Using a dataset of over 1.9 million messages posted on Twitter by about 25,000 ISIS members, we explore how ISIS makes use of social media to spread its propaganda and to recruit militants from the Arab world and across the globe. By distinguishing between violence-driven, theological, and sectarian content, we trace the connection between online rhetoric and key events on the ground. To the best of our knowledge, ours is one of the first studies to focus on Arabic content, while most literature focuses on English content. Our findings yield new important insights about how social media is used by radical militant groups to target the Arab-speaking world, and reveal important patterns in their propaganda efforts. Keywords: Computational Social Science, Social Media, Twitter, ISIS, Islamic Radicalization. Rise of Jihadist Propaganda 2 The Rise of Jihadist Propaganda on Social Networks Introduction Militant groups have long used traditional media and the Internet to disseminate information, spread their propaganda, and recruit potential militants (Cohen-Almagor, R. 2012). But no group to date has been as savvy in terms of its propaganda campaign and recruiting terrorists via the Internet, and specifically via social media platforms, as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) (Shane & Hubbard, 2014). ISIS used a panoply of platforms, such as: Facebook, Instagram, Tumbler, Ask.fm, and most prominently, Twitter to spread its message (Bodine-Baron et al 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Do in the Digital Afterlife When You're Dead
    THINGS TO DO IN THE DIGITAL AFTERLIFE WHEN YOU'RE DEAD Dan Buzzo There are currently few procedures or public awareness about what happens to online digital identities after death. This paper discusses what happens with personal electronic information after death and looks to what is argued to be the rapidly approaching digital Afterlife. This afterlife of new emergent be- haviour offers a challenge of almost unimaginable scope to the creative vision of Artists, Philosophers, Technologists and Cultural thinkers. Introduction As more people live increasing amounts of their lives online the issues associated with physical death in the digital realm are becoming pressingly visible. Year by year deceased users leave behind petabytes of seemingly ‘immortal’ data. Yet despite growing amounts of such legacy data there is currently little legal or cultural precedent as to how to treat the personal data of dead users. “five billion images and counting on Flickr; hundreds of thousands of YouTube videos uploaded every day; oceans of content from 20 million bloggers and 500 million Facebook members; two billion tweets a month.” [1] “One and a half million Facebook users die each year. Twitter faces a similar mortality rate. It's a grow- ing problem for the social-networking sites - and often even more so for the relatives left behind. “ [2] “We feel comfortable saying that 375,000 US based Facebook users will die this year and nearly 1.5m will die worldwide. That’s 3 per minute!” [3] The industry giants have, it could be argued, largely ignored or evaded the discussion of how to deal with legacy data.
    [Show full text]