DOCSLIB.ORG

What Journalists Think of Rating Scales in Fact-Checking a Project Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Journalists Think of Rating Scales in Fact-Checking a Project Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate World of trade-offs: what journalists think of rating scales in fact-checking A Project presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by YUE YU Professor Tom Warhover, Committee Chair Professor Scott Swafford Professor Alison Young December 2019 i © Copyright by Yue Yu 2019 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my parents, Shunxin Yu and Ying Wang, for supporting my decision coming to the U.S. for my dream in journalism two and a half years ago. My mother, who raised me by herself for more than a decade and whose yearlong salary could barely cover my tuition for the first semester, had always wanted me to stay close to home but nonetheless chose to support me and understand my career endeavors. My father, who always encouraged me to push through during the hardest times, has been a great mentor and friend for the past two years. Speaking of mentorship, I’d like to further thank all my professors at the University of Missouri who taught me invaluable skills and helped me become a better journalist. These professors include but are not limited to: Scott Swafford, Mark Horvit, David Herzog, Tom Warhover, Katherine Reed, Brett Johnson, Liz Brixey, Mike Jenner and Jeanne Abbott. I would like to express my special gratitude to Scott Swafford, who nurtured and guided me over the years with his patience and kindness; to Mark Horvit, who connected me to a wide range of opportunities and always challenged me to dig deeper, and to Tom Warhover, who offered me sharp and detailed comments on my research project. I also want to thank my academic advisor Kathy Adams for helping me whenever she can and offering me moral support at some of my lowest points. I’m also grateful for having Alison Young as my D.C. program director, who is ever understanding and caring as I struggle with my health conditions throughout the final semester. Finally, I’d like to thank all the journalists and researchers I had the pleasure of connecting with during my final semester in D.C. That includes my supporting colleagues at the Center for iii Responsive Politics where I fostered a strong set of skills covering national news from the perspective of money in politics, and all the journalists and researchers who took their time for my interviews. This professional project would not have been possible without their help. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Appendix A: Interview Transcripts ............................................................................................................. 38 Appendix B: Activity Log .......................................................................................................................... 99 Appendix C: Personal Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 128 Appendix D: Project Proposal .................................................................................................................. 133 v vi Chapter 1: Introduction I started out at The Columbia Missourian as a local government reporter two and a half years ago. Without a clue of what the U.S. politics was like, I soon started learning about it by covering the city government in Columbia. While covering tax issues, substance abuse as well as the spring municipal election, I found myself frequently examining documents to back up politicians’ claims and sometimes asking them for proof. A year later, I changed my focus to report on issues on a larger scale. During the four months walking the halls in Jefferson City, I often took it with a grain of salt whenever lobbyists and lawmakers spoke of a piece of legislature without offering supporting evidence. It was when I was exposed to the reporting process at PolitiFact that I realized that I had been conducting fact-checks all along while covering politics at different levels. My experience at PolitiFact taught me how to spot checkable dubious claims, to track down independent sources and to defend my ratings. However, I also took notice that, more often than not, my classmates and I would struggle to reach a consensus on which rating we should assign to a claim. What kind of controversy has the rating system brought, if any? And how can we improve the rating system to further contribute to the public discourse? I chose to zoom in on the rating system because I wanted to answer those questions I had as well as to help fact-checkers brainstorm for new ideas to strengthen the current rating system and the practice of fact-checking. Research I conducted suggested clashes between fact-checkers at news outlets with a rating scale and those without, and my interviews with multiple researchers as well as professional fact- checkers further proved that point and offered more insights to the topic. While rating systems 1 generally offer readers a quick glance at the analysis behind each claim, they also invited criticism from readers who questioned the accuracy of the rating and from journalists who warned against the risk of oversimplification through assigning fixed labels to sophisticated issues. For the professional component of my project, I worked as a reporter intern at the Center for Responsive Politics, where I wrote about an array of topics including foreign and domestic lobbying, super PAC spending, political advertisement and industry spending. I learned how to write about national politics from a campaign finance perspective and advanced my skills on deadline writing and data analysis, among others. My opportunity writing about money in politics encouraged me to study the campaign finance laws at the national level, dig through documents to find otherwise overlooked information and pitch story ideas from a brand-new angle. I’ve fostered the habit of examining fact-checking websites for background information I need for certain politicians or pieces of legislature. The fact-checks often offered ample evidence and nuanced analysis that I needed while researching a certain topic. The ratings also helped me a great deal when I sought quick opinions on certain political claims when on deadline. Through this project, I’ve learned much more about both the ongoing debate among fact-checkers on the pros and cons of a rating system and the world of writing about money in politics in an exploding news cycle. Both aspects of my experience in D.C. helped prepare me to become a future political reporter who knows always to look for evidence instead of conducting “he said, she said” reporting and to explore the paper trail politicians and lobbyists leave behind. 2 Chapter 2: Literature Review Theoretical framework The fact-checking process before publication, according to Lucas Graves in his book Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism, speaks to “the imperative to eliminate untruth,” which means fact-checkers need to discern between facts and lies and make judgments to discard or call out misinformation (Graves, 2016). This nature of fact- checking largely fits into the framework of gatekeeping theory invented by psychologist Kurt Lewin in 1947. Lewin coined the term “gate keeper” in his series “Frontiers in Group Dynamics,” which included an analysis of the decision-making process behind food selection (Lewin, 1947). Lewin argued that there is a “gate” at work at each stage of the process of determining what kind of food would finally make it to the dinner table, and each gate is “governed either by impartial rules or by ‘gate keepers.’” (Lewin, 1947, p. 145). For instance, decisions are made over which type of food to grow and which to buy at a grocery store (p. 145). In this case, decision makers act as the “gate keepers” and play a vital role in controlling what type of food to take into consideration and what not at each “gate” (p. 145). They guard the gate to keep certain choices out and let others in according to their own standards (Lewin, 1947). In his article, Lewin (1947) mentioned that the theory of gatekeeping also applies outside of the psychology realm. “This holds not only for food channels but also for the travelling of a news item through certain communication channels in a group, for movements of goods, and the social locomotion of individuals in many organizations,” Lewin wrote (p.145). The theory was then first expanded to the field of communication studies by David Manning White in a case study in 1950 to explain how reporters and editors decide what stories to include in the newspaper. 3 Lewin (1947) further argued that it’s important to understand the “forces” influencing gatekeepers’ decisions, which Lewin said “depend partly on their ideology, that is their system of values and beliefs which determine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-2018 "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House Carol Pauli Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Communications Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, and the President/ Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Carol Pauli, "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House, 33 Ohio St. J. Disp. Resol. 397 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1290 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "Enemy of the People": Negotiating News at the White House CAROL PAULI* I. INTRODUCTION II. WHITE HOUSE PRESS BRIEFINGS A. PressBriefing as Negotiation B. The Parties and Their Power, Generally C. Ghosts in the Briefing Room D. Zone ofPossibleAgreement III. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION A. The Parties and Their Power, 2016-2017 B. White House Moves 1. NOVEMBER 22: POSITIONING 2. JANUARY 11: PLAYING TIT-FOR-TAT a. Tit-for-Tat b. Warning or Threat 3. JANUARY 21: ANCHORING AND MORE a. Anchoring b. Testing the Press c. Taunting the Press d. Changingthe GroundRules e. Devaluing the Offer f. MisdirectingPress Attention * Associate Professor, Texas A&M University School of Law; J.D. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fragility of the Free American Press
    Copyright 2017 by RonNell Andersen Jones and Sonja R. West Vol. 112 Northwestern University Law Review THE FRAGILITY OF THE FREE AMERICAN PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones & Sonja R. West ABSTRACT—President Donald Trump has faced criticism for attacking the press and for abandoning longstanding traditions of accommodating and respecting it. This Essay argues that the national discussion spurred by Trump’s treatment of the press has fallen short of capturing the true seriousness of the situation. Trump’s assault on the custom of press accommodation follows a generation-long collapse of other major press protections. In order to fully understand the critical juncture at which American press freedom now stands, we must expand the discussion beyond talk of a rogue president’s aberrant attacks on the press and consider the increasingly fragile edifice on which the American free press sits. This is because the kind of press we value and need in the United States—one that is free, independent, and democracy-enhancing—does not just occur naturally. Nor is it protected by a single, robust constitutional right. Rather, it is supported by a number of legal and nonlegal pillars, such as the institutional media’s relative financial strength, the goodwill of the public, a mutually dependent relationship with government officials, and the backing of sympathetic judges. Each of these supports has weakened substantially in recent years, leaving the one remaining pillar of tradition and custom to bear more of the weight. Contrary to widespread belief, our concern should not be that Trump might be taking the first step toward crippling the power of the free press, but rather that he might be taking the final step in a process that has long been underway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internationalisation of Bangladeshi Military Intervention in 2007
    The Internationalisation Of Bangladeshi Military Intervention In 2007 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury 17 November, 2014 Countercurrents.org International relations have major role in governing different countries, particularly, in this era of globalisation. It is more evident in developing countries’ politics. Moreover, extra-constitutional government needs special support and attention from foreign powers for its legitimacy. Bangladesh witnessed military-backed government’s parley to gain international support during its tenure of 2007-08 period. The military rule contacted relevant international powerful quarters in order to receive their supports. Appointment of Dr. Fakhruddin Ahmed as the head of the government was nothing but first signal of military administration to show that they have international connections. On the one hand the military’s priority was Dr. Muhammad Yunus, and on the other hand, Yunus’s choice was different. He was more interested to be the head of the state or the President of the country. Instead of joining as head of the government or Chief Adviser during the army-backed regime Yunus made his all out efforts to start with a journey for his new political front ‘Nagarik Shakti’. However, that move has failed as people went against the military’s anti-political behaviour. Role of PR in UN Initially, Permanent Representative of Bangladesh in United Nations Dr. Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury was aspirant for the position of the Chief Adviser. After completion of his regular appointment in the United Nations as Permanent Representative, Iftekhar was discharging his contractual assignment in the same position in New York. In fact, he was the unofficial adviser of Army Chief Moeen Uddin Ahmed prior to 11 January 2007 military coup.
    [Show full text]
  • ENEMY CONSTRUCTION and the PRESS Ronnell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun†
    ENEMY CONSTRUCTION AND THE PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones* & Lisa Grow Sun† ABSTRACT When the President of the United States declared recently that the press is “the enemy,” it set off a firestorm of criticism from defenders of the institutional media and champions of the press’s role in the democracy. But even these Trump critics have mostly failed to appreciate the wider ramifications of the President’s narrative choice. Our earlier work describes the process of governmental “enemy construction,” by which officials use war rhetoric and other signaling behaviors to convey that a person or institution is not merely an institution that, although wholly legitimate, has engaged in behaviors that are disappointing or disapproved, but instead an illegitimate “enemy” triggering a state of Schmittian exceptionalism and justifying the compromise of ordinarily recognized liberties. The Trump administration, with a rhetoric that began during the campaign and burgeoned in the earliest days of Donald Trump’s presidency, has engaged in enemy construction of the press, and the risks that accompany that categorization are grave. This article examines the fuller components of that enemy construction, beyond the overt use of the label. It offers insights into the social, technological, legal, and political realities that make the press ripe for enemy construction in a way that would have been unthinkable a generation ago. It then explores the potential motivations for and consequences of enemy construction. We argue that enemy construction is particularly alarming when the press, rather than some other entity, is the constructed enemy. Undercutting the watchdog, educator, and proxy functions of the press through enemy construction leaves the administration more capable of delegitimizing other institutions and constructing other enemies—including the judiciary, the intelligence community, immigrants, and members of certain races or religions—because the viability and traction of counter-narrative is so greatly diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Tension Between Politics and the Media
    My Vision No.31 2017.9 About this Issue Examining Tension between Politics and the Media The Divisions among the Public at the Root of “Post-truth” Politics Oxford University Press chose “post-truth” as its Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year for 2016. “Post-truth” was defined as an adjective “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” “Post-truth”had existed as a term for some time prior to its Masaki Taniguchi selection as word of the year, but it was the British referendum NIRA Executive Vice President, regarding the nation’s withdrawal from the European Union Professor of Political Science, Graduate Schools for Law and and the US presidential election in 2016 that brought the term Politics, The University of into wider usage. Tokyo Prior to the British referendum, the pro-Brexit side employed the slogan “We send the EU £350 million a week. Let’s fund our NHS instead.” The BBC reported that the British government’s expenditure on the EU was actually £160 million per week, representing a little more than 1% of government expenditure. However, this fact was only vaguely apprehended. In the US, the Trump administration is still frequently the subject of controversy as a result of inaccurate or inappropriate statements. The benchmark for these was provided by the Counselor to the President in responding to queries regarding the veracity of the official claim that the crowd attending Trump’s inauguration was the largest ever
    [Show full text]
  • Business and Politics in the Muslim World Asia Reports
    BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD ASIA REPORTS First Quarter 2009 Volume: 2. No.-1 Reports of February, 2009 Table of contents Reports for the month of February Week-1 February 04, 2009 03 Week-2 February 11, 2009 336 Country profiles Sources 2 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD ASIA REPORT February 04, 2009 Nadia Tasleem: Report on Asia 04 Ashia Rehman: Report on Fertile Crescent 20 Madiha Kaukub: Report on GCC 61 Tatheer Zehra: Report on South East Asia 82 Ghashia Kayani: Report on South Asia 145 Sadia Khanum: Report on India 318 3 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD SOUTH & EAST ASIA and GCC & Fertile Crescent Nadia Tasleem Weekly Report from 26 December 2008 to 30 January 2009 Presentation: 4 February 2009 This report is based on the review of news items focusing on political, economic, social and geo‐ strategic developments in various regions namely; South Asia, East Asia, GCC and Fertile Crescent from 26 December 2008 to 30 January 2009 as have been collected by interns. Summary South Asia: Political Front: After winning 9th Parliamentary elections in Bangladesh, 258 members from winning coalition sworn in as MPs on 3 January 2009; three days later, leader of Awami League Sheikh Haseena Wajid took oath as new Premier of Bangladesh on 6 January 2009. Later on first Parliamentary session was held on 25 January that was not being attended by opposition party i.e. BNP. Besides that Upazila elections finally held on 22 January amidst few incidents of clashes. Though election in six upazila got cancelled however took place successfully in rest of the 475 upazila areas under strong security arrangements as almost 5 lakh security persons were deployed all across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Facts’: How the Fake News Pandemic Is Killing Media As We Know It
    BBC School Report ‘ALTERNATIVE FACTS’: HOW THE FAKE NEWS PANDEMIC IS KILLING MEDIA AS WE KNOW IT On January 22nd, 2017, the controversial days Kellyanne Conway was found discussing the term ‘alternative facts’ was born. Coined by make-believe massacre in two other interviews Kellyanne Conway, the Counselor to United just days beforehand. Whether Conway was simp- States, it was used to defend the White ly lying or indeed did mix up her words is un- known, however both are equally alarming, dis- House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s blatantly playing either a deceitful sentiment or a lack of false claim about the attendance to Trump’s willingness to double check on what they are presidential inauguration. It was just one preaching. more battle in the apparent war against the truth. However, as fun as it is to witch-hunt one of the most powerful authorities in the world for their Conway’s ‘alternative fact’ phrase rapidly went flaws and blunders, the Trump administration isn’t viral across social media, triggering many, includ- the only one taking advantage of ‘alternative ing New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, facts’. Whether in the form of blasphemous sub- to dub the expression Orwellian in reference to terfuge, twisted truths or ridiculous hyperbole, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, a classic hoax and fake news has always existed. Even in 1st novel which discusses a dystopian future con- century Rome, Octavian spread misinformation trolled by a manipulative, totalitarian state. Lies about Marc Anthony to convince the Empire that and twisted truth appear to be almost epidemic in he held anti-Roman sentiment; however, in the Donald Trump’s America: askew unemployment internet era, the issue of fake news is exponential- statistics, fairy-tale terrorist attacks and fictional ly evolving to be worse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Governance
    Crisis in Governance Crisis in Governance: Military Rule in Bangladesh during 2007–2008 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury Crisis in Governance: Military Rule in Bangladesh during 2007–2008 By M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by M Mukhlesur Rahman Chowdhury All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-3642-4 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-3642-5 To the late editor Alhaj Azizur Rahman Chowdhury, my late father, Ratnagarva Sharifa Aziz Chowdhury, my late mother and Bangladesh, my country. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................................................... xi Foreword by Justice Mohammed Abdur Rouf ......................................... xiii Foreword by Dr Charles Che Fonchingong .............................................. xvi Preface .................................................................................................... xviii Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xxiii Introduction ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Linda Qiu and Snopes Fact-Checker Bethania Palma
    EVERYONE HATES THE REFEREE: HOW FACT-CHECKERS MITIGATE A PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF BIAS A project presented to the faculty of the graduate school at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Journalism by ALLISON COLBURN Committee: Katherine Reed (chair) Jennifer Rowe Barbara Cochran December 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank Katherine Reed for helping me take my abstract ideas into something concrete and researchable. She was an essential guide when I was struggling to come up with my project proposal. I also want to thank Jennifer Rowe for her encouragement and for turning my “judgements” into “judgments.” And Barbara Cochran has given me a great deal of support during my project’s professional component. I have gained so much from having three intelligent, successful and strong-willed women on my committee. Last, I would be remiss to forget to acknowledge the Missouri School of Journalism. The disillusioned student who started with the school in fall 2015 is a better, more confident version of herself today. ii" TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments.................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1. Introduction..............................................................................................3 2. Activity Log.............................................................................................7 3. Evaluation .............................................................................................17 4. Physical Evidence .................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Well and Doing Good
    John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series Doing Well and Doing Good Thomas E. Patterson December 2000 RWP01-001 The views expressed in the KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. All works posted here are owned and copyrighted by the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. DOING WELL AND DOING GOOD: How Soft News and Critical Journalism Are Shrinking the News Audience and Weakening Democracy– And What News Outlets Can Do About It by Thomas E. Patterson Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Research sponsored by a grant from the Smith-Richardson Foundation. © Copyright 2000, President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. The Joan Shorenstein Center PRESS • POLITICS • PUBLIC POLICY • Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government INTRODUCTION interest in politics and in news, and that will strengthen the press’s watchdog role. The news has changed greatly during the past two decades. In response to the intensely These arguments are based on a two-year competitive media environment created by cable news study that was undertaken with the support news and entertainment, news outlets have of a grant from the Smith-Richardson softened their coverage. Their news has also Foundation. We conducted national surveys become increasingly critical in tone. designed to measure Americans’ news habits, interests, and preferences. Our research also Soft news and critical journalism have not includes an analysis of 5331 news stories, stopped the decline in news audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • More E-Gates Will Be Needed at HIA: Al-Baker
    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 1 Al-Attiyah pulls out of Dakar INDEX Rally DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2, 16 COMMENT 14, 15 ARAB WORLD 3 BUSINESS 1-8, 10-12 19,890.94 10,717.34 53.68 INTERNATIONAL 4–12 CLASSIFIED 9 Qatar’s real economic -51.22 +28.56 +0.42 ISLAM 13 SPORTS 1 – 8 -0.26% +0.27% +0.79% Latest Figures growth is seen at 3.7% in Q3 published in QATAR since 1978 FRIDAY Vol. XXXVII No. 10325 January 6, 2017 Rabia II 8, 1438 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals Emir watches Qatar Open matches More e-gates In brief will be needed QATAR | Diplomacy FM meets former UK prime minister at HIA: al-Baker HE the Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohamed bin Abdulrahman By Pratap John ternational Airport, the MoI said. her ID card or passport on the e- al-Thani met former UK prime Chief Business Reporter Al-Baker said Qatar was reader at the e-gate, which will minister Tony Blair in Doha among the very few countries read the vital data stored on the yesterday. that had introduced e-gates on card or the passport and verify They discussed developments in ore e-gates at the Ha- a major scale, some 10 years ago. them. the Middle-East and exchanged mad International “Unfortunately, many people “Then the device will direct views on issues of joint interest. MAirport (HIA) will be- did not want to use it for several the passenger in Arabic or Eng- come necessary with the facil- reasons.
    [Show full text]