Baconian-Rosicrucian Ciphers
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Baconian-Rosicrucian Ciphers An introduction to the cryptography used by Francis Bacon and the Rosicrucian-Freemasonic fraternity. Author: Peter Dawkins Cipher was extremely important to Francis Bacon. Not only did he regard mathematics (i.e. number and geometry) as a vitally important and metaphysical science, and one of the essential forms of things,1 but he also considered that Allusive or Parabolical Poesie, using fables, parables and symbolism, was “a sacred and venerable thing, especially seeing Religion itself hath allowed it a work of that nature, and by it traffics divine commodities with men,” and in addition was essential to veil the secrets and mysteries of religion, policy and philosophy from eyes unfit or unready to see them.2 Like the Platonists and Kabbalists before him, Bacon saw nature, and the underlying ‘forms’ of nature (i.e. their geometry, proportion, numerology and signature), as symbols of spiritual truths. Francis Bacon made use of several different kinds and types of cipher, some of them to sign various published works issued outwardly under different names or pseudonyms, some of them to give signposts, messages or teachings, some of them to provide geometric constructions (such as a Masonic square and compasses signature or a compass rose providing map directions), and some of them being a method by means of which to analyse and raise consciousness, and ultimately to know the metaphysical laws and intelligencies of the universe. Francis himself was a secretive person both by choice and by necessity. He learnt the use of ciphers early in his youth, first of all from his mother, Lady Ann Bacon, who used cipher in her literary works as well as letters, and later when he was employed by Lord Burghley and Sir Francis Walsingham on intelligence matters both at home and abroad. Francis’ brother Anthony was likewise employed, travelling to France and elsewhere for this and other purposes, where he remained for over twelve years. When Anthony finally returned to England in 1592, Francis, by request of the Queen, “knit” his brother’s services to Essex. Anthony thereafter acted as a virtual secretary of state to the Earl, running his own network of spies and, together with his brother Francis, feeding both the Earl and the Queen with intelligence. Together the brothers set up their own intelligence headquarters in London, assisted by top agents and cryptologists such as Thomas Phelippes, Anthony Standen, Henry Wotton and Nicholas Faunt, who between them had travelled widely and were highly trained and experienced. Francis Bacon not only used cipher but also invented several ciphers of his own, one of which he describes in Book VI of the 1623 Latin edition of his Advancement of Learning (the De Augmentis Scientiarum, first published in English translation in 1640). This particular cipher he calls the Biliteral Cipher, which he says he invented in his youth whilst in Paris (1576-9). From the principles of this cipher, Morse Code was later developed and ultimately the binary system that computers use nowadays. The cipher used by Lady Ann Bacon and her sons, Anthony and Francis, was a simple one involving the substitution of certain English characters with Greek ones. They used this in literary works as well as in letters to each other. Petter Amundsen, for instance, has found Francis Bacon Research Trust ~ UK Registered Charitable Trust #280616 ~ VAT Reg. #487 8233 01 www.fbrt.org.uk | www.francisbaconresearchtrust.org.uk BACONIAN-ROSICRUCIAN CIPHERS 2 the use of this cipher by Francis Bacon in the Shakespeare works.3 Other simple ciphers used by Francis Bacon and his Rosicrucian fraternity include the capital letter and numerical ones. The capital letter ciphers are both easy to see yet easy to miss or dismiss as either unimportant or printer’s errors. For instance, the portrait poem that fronts the Shakespeare Folio emphasises the importance of the word “TWO” (the capitalised first letters of the first three non-indented lines) by means of the first word “To” of the address heading the poem, and by the use of the word “Figure” instead of “Picture” (as used in the last line) followed by “that thou here seest put”. A ‘figure’ is pre-eminently a number (cipher)—or a form, shape or symbol—and here a number is indeed described. It is the number 2. This is used as a signpost, such as to page 2 of the plays, which is page 2 of The Tempest, wherein can be found all manner of cryptic information. But the 2 is also a signpost to other secrets, or mysteries, as well, including the association of 2 (two) with Shakespeare as a “figure” as portrayed on page 2 of the prefatory material. Not only this, but the capitalised initial letters of The Tempest render ‘T.T.’ in the capital letter code, which is a Masonic signature (see below). Whilst The Tempest is the first play in the Folio, the portrait poem is the first text in the Folio, printed on the first page of the prefatory section. This portrait poem also presents the T.T. signature, with a capital T starting the first line of the address (“To the Reader”) and a second capital T starting the first line of the poem (“This Figure…). The ten lines of the poem and twelve lines of the whole text (address, poem and signature) also bring in the idea of T.T. (i.e. Ten and Twelve), as well as the numbers 10 and 12. If we add these two numbers, 10 + 12, we obtain 22, or Twenty-Two, which is T.T. again. Moreover, the signature “B.I.” at the end, normally assumed to be the capital initials of Ben Jonson, are also the capital initials of Boaz and Jachin, the names of the twin Great Pillars of Freemasonry—the two pillars of brass that stood at the entrance to Solomon’s Temple. These pillars are ‘Two’ in number and ‘Twins’ to each other, like the Gemini. ‘T.T.’ is sometimes used to refer to them, as well as ‘B.I.’. The letter T, like the letter L, is associated with the Master of a Freemasonic Lodge and his emblem, the Square (or setsquare). To confirm and emphasise this, the first printed line of The Tempest consists of the word “Master”—a word set apart on its own line and above the associated speaking part, “Bote-swaine,” of the actor playing the part of the Master. The Francis Bacon Research Trust ~ UK Registered Charitable Trust #280616 ~ VAT Reg. #487 8233 01 www.fbrt.org.uk | www.francisbaconresearchtrust.org.uk BACONIAN-ROSICRUCIAN CIPHERS 3 word “Bote-swaine” is thus on line 2 of the play, and its first letter is “B”, enlarged and contained in an ornate box over three lines deep. B is the second letter of the alphabet, and thus its simple cipher is 2. First page (upper part) of The Tempest, Shakespeare First Folio (1623) Amongst other things, these clues give the key that the Simple Elizabethan Cipher (A = 1, B = 2, C = 3, etc.) is being used and that the Shakespeare Folio is a Freemasonic-Rosicrucian production. They also indicate the essential ‘foundation’ or law underlying the ‘temple’ of Shakespeare plays—and indeed of the whole Shakespeare canon. This is what can be referred to as the Gemini principle. The Gemini in Greek myth are the twin children of Leda and the Swan, one twin being immortal (Pollux) and the other being mortal (Castor). Just as for Brahma and Sarasvati in Hindu myth, whose ‘vehicle’ or creative form is the Hamsa Swan, the Swan is the symbol of Zeus and Leda in the role of Creator, sounding the Word of Creation poetically and artistically as the Divine Poet. Their children, the Gemini, are likewise ‘Swans’: hence the attribute of ‘Swan’ to any great poet who acts as a creator, such as Orpheus, the instaurator of the Dionysian-Orphic Mysteries. The Gemini are also known in myth as ‘Spear-shakers’. Thus it is not by chance that Ben Jonson calls Shakespeare the “Sweet Swan of Avon” in his poem ‘To the Author Shakespeare’ in the preface to the Shakespeare First Folio. In other words, a hint is given that there are two ‘Swans’, two ‘Shakespeares’. This can be interpreted in several ways, but one interpretation, which is supported by the inscription of the Shakespeare Monument in Holy Trinity Church, Stratford-upon-Avon, is that there is one who is the ‘immortal’ poet-author and the other who is the ‘mortal’ actor-producer, corresponding in the symbolism of architecture to the architect and the builder/craftsman. Rosicrucianism (c.f. Architectonics) and Freemasonry (the Craft) have a similar relationship. Francis Bacon Research Trust ~ UK Registered Charitable Trust #280616 ~ VAT Reg. #487 8233 01 www.fbrt.org.uk | www.francisbaconresearchtrust.org.uk BACONIAN-ROSICRUCIAN CIPHERS 4 Besides signposting page 2 of the plays in the Shakespeare Folio, the figure 2 also signposts page 2 of the prefatory material. This second page (which is the second printed page of the Folio) contains the title of the Folio and the portrait of Shakespeare that is referred to as a “figure” (i.e. 2) on line 2 of the preceding Portrait Poem. This portrait of Shakespeare figuratively portrays the secret that there are indeed two Shakespeares, the author and the actor, with the latter masking the former. A strong line beneath the chin of the face, together with the slight disembodied and disproportionate portrayal of the face, suggests that the face is a mask that hides the true author beneath. Supporting this is the portrayal of Shakespeare’s doublet as having two left shoulders.