This Preliminary Official Statement and the information contained herein are subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy them be accepted, prior to the time the Official Statement is delivered in final form. Under no circumstances shall this Preliminary Official Statement constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of, these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. concurrently withthedeliveryof2017ABondsbyASSUREDGUARANTYMUNICIPALCORP. subject tothetermsandconditionsofInstallmentPurchaseAgreement. Payments. TheDistrictmayincuradditionalobligationspayablefromNetElectricSystemRevenuesonaparitywiththeSeries2017AInstallment Payments, or HydroelectricSystem. not pledgedtotheSeries2017AInstallmentPaymentsandarepayablefromrevenuesofDistrict’sWater System payable fromNetElectricSystemRevenuesonaparitywiththe2017ABonds. Bonds fromDistrictreserves,asfurtherdescribedherein,thewillhaveapproximately$55,170,000aggregateprincipalamountof outstanding Revenues oftheDistrict’sElectricSystem.Afterprepayment2012SystemBondsonorbeforedateissuance the2017A The obligationoftheDistricttomakeSeries2017AInstallmentPaymentsisaspecialpayablesolelyfromNetElectric System the AuthorityfromDistrictpursuanttoanInstallmentPurchaseAgreement,datedasofJuly1,2017,byandbetween Authority. amounts ondepositinfundsandaccountsunder the Indenture.AuthorityRevenuesconsistprimarilyofSeries2017AInstallmentPaymentsreceivedby Official Statement. subsequent disbursementtoDTCParticipantswhowillremitsuchpaymentsthebeneficialownersof2017ABonds. principal amountsof$5,000andintegralmultiplesthereof.Paymentsinterestonthe2017ABondswillbepaidbyTrusteetoDTCfor Company, New York, New York. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their interest in the 2017A Bonds. Individual purchases will be in The 2017ABondsarebeingissuedinfullyregisteredbook-entryformandinitiallythenameofCede&Co.,asnomineeDepositoryTrust Reserve Fund;and(iv)topaythecostsofissuing2017ABonds,allasmorefullydescribedherein. policy toguaranteepaymentoftheprincipalandintereston2017ABonds;(iii)purchaseadebtservicereserveinsurancefordepositin certain capitalimprovementstotheElectricSystemofMercedIrrigationDistrict,amemberAuthority;(ii)purchasemunicipalbondinsurance payable fromthesourcesdescribedherein.The2017ABondsarebeingissued:(i)toprovidefundsfinancedesign,acquisitionandconstructionof Indenture ofTrust,datedasJuly1,2017,byandbetweentheAuthorityTheBankNewYorkMellonTrustCompany,N.A.,trustee,willbe tax. Seethecaption“TAXMATTERS”withrespecttotaxconsequencesrelating2017ABonds. the furtheropinionofBondCounsel,interest(andoriginalissuediscount)on2017ABondsisexemptfromStateCaliforniapersonalincome and isnotanitemoftax preference forpurposesofcalculatingthefederalalternative minimum taximposedonindividualsandcorporations.In in thisOfficialStatement,interest(andoriginalissuediscount)onthe2017ABondsisexcludedfromgrossincomeforfederaltaxpurposes and judicialdecisions,assumingtheaccuracyofcertainrepresentationscompliancewithcovenantsrequirementsdescribed * Preliminary, subjecttochange. Dated: July__,2017 Dated: DateofDelivery NEW ISSUE–BOOK-ENTRYONLY available fordeliverythroughthefacilities ofTheDepositoryTrustCompanyonoraboutAugust8,2017. Counsel totheDistrictandAuthority, fortheInsurerbyitscounselandTrusteecounsel. Itisanticipatedthatthe2017ABondswillbe will bepasseduponfortheUnderwriters bytheircounsel,Gilmore&Bell,P.C.,fortheAuthorityand District byPhillipR.McMurray,Esq.,General of the2017ABondsbyStradlingYocca Carlson & Rauth,aProfessional Corporation,BondCounsel,andcertainotherconditions.Certainlegal matters Official Statementshallhavethemeaningsascribedtheretoherein. entire OfficialStatementtoobtaininformationessentialthemaking ofaninformedinvestmentdecision.Capitalizedtermsusedonthecoverthis OR PLEDGEDANYFORMOFTAXATION. OBLIGATION FORWHICHTHEDISTRICTISOBLIGATEDTOLEVYOR PLEDGEANYFORMOFTAXATIONORFORWHICHTHEDISTRICTHASLEVIED THEREOF INCONTRAVENTIONOFANYCONSTITUTIONALORSTATUTORY DEBTLIMITATIONORRESTRICTIONANDDOESNOTCONSTITUTEAN AGREEMENT, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OF THE DISTRICT OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION PAYABLE SOLELY FROM NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES OF THE DISTRICT AND OTHER FUNDS DESCRIBED IN THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE PROVISION. OR ANYMEMBEROFTHEAUTHORITYINCONTRAVENTION OFANYSTATECALIFORNIACONSTITUTIONALORSTATUTORY LIABILITY OROBLIGATIONOFTHESTATECALIFORNIAANYPUBLICAGENCYTHEREOF(OTHERTHANAUTHORITY) INTEREST ON,THE2017ABONDS.AUTHORITYHASNOTAXINGPOWERS.BONDSDONOTCONSTITUTE ADEBT, OR ANYMEMBEROFTHEAUTHORITYISPLEDGEDTOPAYMENTPRINCIPALAMOUNTREDEMPTIONPRICE OF,OR In theopinionofStradlingYoccaCarlson&Rauth,aProfessionalCorporation,BondCounsel,underexistingstatutes,regulations,rulings The scheduledpaymentoftheprincipalandintereston2017ABondswhenduewillbeguaranteedunderaninsurancepolicyto issued The DistricthascovenantednottoincuradditionalobligationspayablefromNetElectricSystemRevenuesseniortheSeries2017AInstallment The Districtowns and operatesa Water SystemandHydroelectricbut the revenues of theDistrict’sWaterSystemand Hydroelectric Systemare The 2017ABondsarelimitedobligationsoftheAuthority.payablesolelyfromAuthorityRevenuesandcertain other The 2017ABondsaresubjecttooptional,mandatorysinkingfundandextraordinaryredemptionpriormaturityasdescribedin this Interest dueonthe2017ABondsispayablesemiannuallyApril1andOctoberofeachyear,commencing1,2017,untilmaturitythereof. The MercedIrrigationDistrictFinancingAuthorityElectricSystemRevenueBonds,Series2017Aarebeingissuedbythepursuanttoan The 2017ABondsareofferedwhen, asandifissuedreceivedbytheUnderwriters,subjecttoapproval ofthevalid,legalandbindingnature This coverpagecontainscertaininformationforquickreferenceonly. Itisnotacompletesummaryofthe2017ABonds.Investorsshouldread THE OBLIGATIONOFDISTRICTTOMAKESERIES2017A INSTALLMENT PAYMENTSISASPECIALOBLIGATIONOFTHEDISTRICT NEITHER THEFAITHANDCREDITNORTAXINGPOWEROFSTATECALIFORNIAORANYPUBLICAGENCYTHEREOF
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Citigroup ELECTRIC SYSTEMREVENUEBONDS,SERIES2017A
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT JULY 20, 2017
MATURITY SCHEDULE–SeeInsideCoverPage $19,990,000* Caldwell Sutter Capital,Inc. Due: October 1,asshownoninsidecover RATINGS: Seethecaption“RATINGS”
MATURITY SCHEDULE
$19,990,000* MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2017A
Maturity Date Principal Interest (October 1) Amount Rate Price Yield CUSIP† $ % %
$______% Term Bonds Due October 1, 20__, Price ___, Yield ___%, CUSIP _____
* Preliminary, subject to change. † CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. Copyright © 2017 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by Standard & Poor’s CUSIP Service Bureau. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CUSIP Service Bureau. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. Neither the District nor the Purchaser takes any responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. NO DEALER, BROKER, SALESPERSON OR ANY OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER OR SALE OF THE 2017A BONDS, OTHER THAN AS CONTAINED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, ANY SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE AUTHORITY, THE DISTRICT OR THE UNDERWRITERS. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OF ANY SECURITIES OTHER THAN THOSE DESCRIBED ON THE COVER PAGE OR AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THE 2017A BONDS BY ANY PERSON IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE. THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A CONTRACT WITH THE PURCHASERS OF THE 2017A BONDS.
The information contained in this Official Statement has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but this information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The Underwriters have provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement:
The Underwriters have reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as part of, their responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriters do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information.
The information and expressions of opinion in this Official Statement are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Authority or the District since the date hereof.
This Official Statement contains forward-looking statements, including: (a) statements containing projections of Net Electric System Revenues, expenditures and other financial items; (b) statements of the plans and objectives of the District for future operations of the Electric System; (c) statements of future economic performance of the Electric System; and (d) statements of the assumptions underlying or relating to statements described in (a), (b) and (c) above (collectively, “Forward-Looking Statements”). All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Official Statement regarding the District’s financial position, business strategy, capital resources and plans and objectives for future operations of the Electric System, are Forward-Looking Statements. Although such expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Statements of important factors (collectively, the “Cautionary Statements”) that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations of the District are disclosed in this Official Statement. All subsequent written and oral Forward-Looking Statements attributable to the Authority or the District or person acting on behalf of the Authority or the District are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements.
This Official Statement is submitted in connection with the sale of the 2017A Bonds and may not be reproduced or be used, as a whole or in part, for any other purpose.
In connection with the offering of the 2017A Bonds, the Underwriters may overallot or effect transactions which stabilize or maintain the market price of the 2017A Bonds at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. The Underwriters may offer and sell the 2017A Bonds to certain dealers and dealer banks and banks acting as agent and others at prices lower than the public offering prices stated on the cover page of this Official Statement, and the Underwriters may change those public offering prices from time to time.
THE 2017A BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), IN RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION CONTAINED IN THE ACT. THE 2017A BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE.
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (“AGM”) makes no representation regarding the 2017A Bonds or the advisability of investing in the 2017A Bonds. In addition, AGM has not independently verified, makes no representation regarding, and does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this Official Statement or any information or disclosure contained herein, or omitted herefrom, other than with respect to the accuracy of the information regarding AGM supplied by AGM and presented under the heading “BOND INSURANCE” and Appendix G—”SPECIMEN MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE POLICY.” The District maintains a website. However, the information presented there is not a part of this Official Statement and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision with respect to the 2017A Bonds. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DISTRICT AND THE AUTHORITY
Dave Long, President/Chair Scott Koehn, Vice President/Vice Chair Kevin Gonzalves, Director Jeff Marchini, Director Billy Pimentel, Director
DISTRICT STAFF
John Sweigard, General Manager Hicham Eltal, Deputy General Manager, Water Supply/Rights Bryan Kelly, Deputy General Manager, Water Resources Don Ouchley, Deputy General Manager, Energy Resources Brian Stubbert, Chief Financial Officer Victor Moreno, Director of Administrative Services Mike Jensen, Public and Government Relations Officer Bret Theodozio, Director of Parks and Recreation
SPECIAL SERVICES
General Counsel to the District and the Authority
Phillip R. McMurray, Esq.
Bond Counsel
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation Sacramento, California
Municipal Advisor
Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. Irvine, California
Trustee
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. Los Angeles, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
INTRODUCTION ...... 1 General ...... 1 Purposes of the 2017A Bonds ...... 1 Authority for Issuance ...... 1 Sources of Payment for the 2017A Bonds ...... 1 Sources of Payment for the Series 2017A Installment Payments ...... 2 Reserve Fund ...... 3 Insurance ...... 3 Additional Parity Obligations ...... 3 Merced Irrigation District ...... 3 The Authority ...... 4 Professionals Involved in the Offering ...... 4 Other Information About this Official Statement ...... 4
THE PROJECT ...... 5
ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS ...... 6
THE 2017A BONDS ...... 6 Terms of the 2017A Bonds ...... 6 Redemption of 2017A Bonds ...... 6 Notice of Redemption ...... 7 Selection of 2017A Bonds for Redemption ...... 8 Partial Redemption of Bonds ...... 8 Effect of Redemption of Bonds ...... 8 Book-Entry Only System ...... 8 Transfers and Exchanges Upon Termination of Book-Entry Only System ...... 9 Debt Service Schedule ...... 10
SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS ...... 11 General ...... 11 Revenue Pledge Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments ...... 11 Rate Covenant Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments ...... 12 Limitations on District Parity and Superior Obligations; Subordinate Obligations ...... 13 Reserve Fund ...... 14 Rate Stabilization Fund ...... 15
BOND INSURANCE ...... 15 Bond Insurance Policy ...... 15 Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp...... 15
THE AUTHORITY ...... 17
THE DISTRICT ...... 17
APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ...... 17
LITIGATION ...... 18 The Authority ...... 18 The District ...... 18
-i- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page
TAX MATTERS...... 18
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ...... 20
MUNICIPAL ADVISOR ...... 21
RATINGS ...... 21
UNDERWRITING ...... 21
MISCELLANEOUS ...... 22
APPENDIX A INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT ...... A-1 EXHIBIT A-1 MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ...... A-1-1 APPENDIX B DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ELECTRIC MARKETS AND OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING THE UTILITY INDUSTRY ...... B-1 APPENDIX C DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS ...... C-1 APPENDIX D PROPOSED FORM OF LEGAL OPINION ...... D-1 APPENDIX E DTC AND BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM ...... E-1 APPENDIX F FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE ...... F-1 APPENDIX G SPECIMEN MUNICIPAL BOND INSURANCE POLICY ...... G-1
-ii- $19,990,000* MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2017A
INTRODUCTION
General
This Official Statement provides information concerning the issuance of the Merced Irrigation District Financing Authority Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A (the “2017A Bonds”) pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of July 1, 2017 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Merced Irrigation District Financing Authority (the “Authority”) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”). See the caption “THE 2017A BONDS.”
Purposes of the 2017A Bonds
The 2017A Bonds are being issued: (i) to provide funds to finance the design, acquisition and construction of certain capital improvements to the Electric System of the Merced Irrigation District (the “District”), a member of the Authority, as described under the caption “THE PROJECT;” (ii) to purchase a municipal bond insurance policy to guarantee payment of the principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds; (iii) to purchase a debt service reserve insurance policy for deposit in the Reserve Fund and (iv) to pay the costs of issuing the 2017A Bonds. See the caption “ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS” and “THE PROJECT.”
Authority for Issuance
The 2017A Bonds are being issued under the Indenture and the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, as amended, constituting Article 4 of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “State”).
Sources of Payment for the 2017A Bonds
The 2017A Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority. The 2017A Bonds are payable solely from Authority Revenues and certain other amounts on deposit in funds and accounts under the Indenture. Authority Revenues consist primarily of payments (the “Series 2017A Installment Payments”) received from the District pursuant to an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2017 (the “Installment Purchase Agreement”), by and between the District and the Authority. See the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS.”
NEITHER THE FAITH AND CREDIT NOR THE TAXING POWER OF THE STATE OR ANY PUBLIC AGENCY THEREOF OR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY IS PLEDGED TO THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OR REDEMPTION PRICE OF, OR INTEREST ON, THE 2017A BONDS. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWERS. THE 2017A BONDS DO NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT, LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION OF THE STATE OR ANY PUBLIC AGENCY THEREOF (OTHER THAN THE AUTHORITY) OR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY STATE CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY PROVISION.
* Preliminary, subject to change.
1 Sources of Payment for the Series 2017A Installment Payments
Pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement, the District is obligated to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments as the purchase price for certain capital improvements described in the Installment Purchase Agreement. The obligation of the District to make the Series 2017A Installment Payments is a special obligation of the District payable solely from the Electric System Revenues and other funds described in the Installment Purchase Agreement, and does not constitute a debt of the District or of the State or of any political subdivision thereof in contravention of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction and does not constitute an obligation for which the District is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation or for which the District has levied or pledged any form of taxation.
In order to carry out and effectuate the pledge and lien contained in the Installment Purchase Agreement, the District has agreed and covenanted that all Electric System Revenues (as such term is defined in the Installment Purchase Agreement), will be received by the District in trust thereunder and will be deposited when and as received in the Electric System Revenue Fund, which fund the District has agreed and covenanted to maintain so long as any Series 2017A Installment Payments remain unpaid.
All amounts on deposit in the Electric System Revenue Fund have been irrevocably pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments as provided in the Installment Purchase Agreement. Such pledge constitutes a first lien on, subject to application of amounts on deposit therein as permitted in the Installment Purchase Agreement, the Electric System Revenue Fund for the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and all other parity Contracts and Bonds (as such terms are defined in the Installment Purchase Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Installment Purchase Agreement. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Other Outstanding Obligations.”
The District will, from the moneys in the Electric System Revenue Fund, pay all Maintenance and Operation Costs of the Electric System (as such term is defined in the Installment Purchase Agreement), including amounts reasonably required to be set aside in contingency reserves for Maintenance and Operation Costs of the Electric System, the payment of which is not then immediately required. All remaining moneys in the Electric System Revenue Fund (the “Net Electric System Revenues”) will be set aside by the District as set forth in the Installment Purchase Agreement to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments and other parity Contracts and Bonds. See the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS.”
The District currently has $65,870,000 aggregate principal amount of Bonds outstanding payable from Net Electric System Revenues, consisting of the outstanding principal amount of the District’s 2012 Electric System Revenue Bonds (the “2012 Electric System Bonds”) and the Electric System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A (the “2015A Electric System Bonds”). The District expects to prepay, from District reserves, the 2012 Electric System Bonds on or before the date of delivery of the 2017A Bonds. After such prepayment, the District will have $55,170,000 of 2015A Electric System Bonds outstanding which are payable from Net Electric System Revenues. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT— Other Outstanding Obligations.
The District owns and operates a water system and a hydroelectric system (as more fully defined in Appendix A hereto the “Water System” and the “Hydroelectric System,” respectively). The revenues of the District’s Water System and Hydroelectric System are not pledged to the payment of principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds and principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds are not payable from revenues of the District’s Water System or Hydroelectric System. In addition, the District entered into an unsecured line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank National Association in a not-to-exceed amount of $25,000,000 to finance the District’s operating and capital expenditures (the “Line of Credit”). The Line of Credit is payable from all legally available funds and revenues of the District, including Net Electric System Revenues available after payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and other Bonds and Contracts. See Appendix A— “INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the captions “THE
2 DISTRICT— Other Outstanding Obligations” and “—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage.” The Line of Credit is scheduled to expire on August 17, 2017. The District expects to extend the Line of Credit on or before August 17, 2017.
Reserve Fund
A Reserve Fund for the 2017A Bonds is established pursuant to the Indenture in an amount equal to the Reserve Requirement. The Reserve Requirement for the 2017A Bonds is $______. AGM has committed to issue, simultaneously with the issuance of the 2017A Bonds, a municipal bond debt service reserve insurance policy (the “Reserve Surety Policy”) in the principal amount of $______for deposit in the Reserve Fund to satisfy the Reserve Requirement. See the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS— Reserve Fund.”
Insurance
Payment of principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds will be insured by a municipal bond insurance policy (the “Policy”) to be issued by the Insurer concurrently with the issuance of the 2017A Bonds. See the caption “BOND INSURANCE.”
Additional Parity Obligations
The District has covenanted not to incur additional obligations payable from Net Electric System Revenues senior to the Series 2017A Installment Payments. The District may incur additional obligations on a parity with the Series 2017A Installment Payments, subject to the terms and conditions described under the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS—Limitations on Parity and Superior Obligations; Subordinate Obligations.”
Merced Irrigation District
The District is a California irrigation district organized in 1919 under the provisions of the Irrigation District Law (codified as Division 11 of the California Water Code). The District has the powers under the Irrigation District Law to, among other things, provide water, electricity and water-related recreation services. In connection therewith, the District has the powers of eminent domain, to contract, to construct works, to fix rates and charges for commodities or services furnished and to incur indebtedness.
The District owns and operates a retail electric system which serves portions of the District. The District is not the sole provider of retail electric service within the District. Currently the District serves approximately 9,000 customers within the District while the Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”), an investor owned utility serves the remaining customers within the electric service area of the District. See Appendix A— “INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—General.”
The District owns, operates and maintains a Hydroelectric System, consisting of the New Exchequer Dam, which impounds the New Exchequer Reservoir (Lake McClure) and the McSwain Dam, which impounds the McSwain Reservoir (Lake McSwain). New Exchequer Reservoir and the McSwain Reservoir have storage capacities of approximately 1,024,600 acre feet and 9,730 acre-feet, respectively. Both dams, reservoirs and related hydroelectric facilities comprise the Merced River Hydroelectric Project. The Merced River Hydroelectric Project is licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”).
The District owns, operates and maintains a Water System which delivers water through approximately 720 miles of earthen and concrete-lined canals, and pipelines. The District owns approximately 215 well sites. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Water System and Hydroelectric System.”
3 In 1994, the District established a storm water drainage district known as the Merced Irrigation District Drainage Improvement District #1 (the “Drainage District”). The District uses portions of its irrigation distribution system for urban storm drainage by routing natural stream flows and runoff from urban developments, away from populated areas. Drainage fees are assessed annually by the District and are collected through the County of Merced (the “County”) tax rolls but are not included in Electric System Revenues. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Drainage District.”
The District owns, operates and maintains five recreation areas adjacent to Lake McClure and Lake McSwain which consist of the Lake McSwain Recreation Area, located adjacent to Lake McSwain; McClure Point, Barrett Cove, Horseshoe Bend and Bagby Recreation Areas, all located adjacent to Lake McClure (collectively, the Parks and Recreation Facilities”). Revenues generated by the District’s Parks and Recreation Facilities are not included as Electric System Revenues. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Parks and Recreation.”
The Authority
The Authority is a joint exercise of powers agency organized under the provisions of State law governing the joint exercise of powers, being Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State (the “Act”) and a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2015 (the “Joint Powers Agreement”), by and between the District and the Modesto Irrigation District, to provide for the financing and refinancing of capital improvement projects of the District by exercising the powers referred to in the Joint Powers Agreement, and any other transaction authorized by law. Under the Act and the Joint Powers Agreement, the Authority has the power to issue bonds to pay the costs of public capital improvements. See the caption “THE AUTHORITY.” The Board of Directors of the Authority consists of the members of the Board of Directors of the District.
Professionals Involved in the Offering
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. will act as Trustee with respect to the 2017A Bonds. The 2017A Bonds are offered when, as and if issued, subject to approval as to their legality by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Sacramento, California, Bond Counsel, and certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed on for the Underwriters by their counsel, Gilmore & Bell, P.C., for the Authority and the District by Phillip R. McMurray, Esq., General Counsel to the Authority and the District, for the Insurer by its counsel and for the Trustee by its counsel. Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. Irvine, California is acting as municipal advisor to the District. Payment of the fees of Bond Counsel, the Municipal Advisor and Underwriters’ Counsel is contingent upon issuance of the 2017A Bonds.
Other Information About this Official Statement
There follows in this Official Statement (and attached appendices) a brief description of the 2017A Bonds, the security for the 2017A Bonds, the District, the Authority and certain other information relevant to the issuance of the 2017A Bonds. The descriptions and summaries of various documents in this Official Statement do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive, and reference is made to each document for complete details of all terms and conditions. All statements in this Official Statement are qualified in their entirety by reference to each document.
All capitalized terms used herein and not normally capitalized have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture and the Installment Purchase Agreement, the summaries of which are included in Appendix C, unless otherwise stated in this Official Statement.
4 The Appendices are integral parts of this Official Statement and must be read together with all other parts of this Official Statement.
THE PROJECT
The District expects to apply a portion of the proceeds of the 2017A Bonds and certain other District funds to finance the design and construction of certain transmission and distribution facilities for the District’s Electric System (the “Project”). The Project consists of a new substation, an interconnection with an existing Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)/California ISO’s (CAISO) system via an existing adjacent PG&E transmission line, and distribution lines to connect the new substation with the District’s existing Electric System. The total cost of the Project is expected to be approximately $45,000,000, of which approximately $22,000,000 is expected to be financed from a portion of the proceeds of the 2017A Bonds, as described below, and the balance is expected to be funded from District reserves.
The Project consists of two components – the distribution component and the transmission component. The District expects the costs of the distribution component to be approximately $32,000,000, of which the District expects to finance approximately $22,000,000 from the proceeds of the 2017A Bonds. The distribution component consists of approximately 15.7 miles of 21kV distribution lines to connect a new 230/21kV substation (the “Lyons Substation”) to the District’s Electric System. The majority of the new distribution lines would be located within existing right-of-ways within the City of Merced.
The District expects the costs of the transmission component to be approximately $13,000,000 which the District currently expects to fund from District reserves. The transmission component of the Project consists of the Lyons Substation and an interconnection of the Lyons Substation with PG&E/CAISO system via an existing adjacent PG&E transmission line. Such interconnection is expected to require the installation of two 230 kV poles. The new Lyons Substation site would be located on approximately 11.2 acres within the City of Merced, in a planned industrial and commercial development area. The District is currently exploring the possibility of being reimbursed for costs of the transmission component of the Project by CAISO through transmission access charges (TAC), however, the District can make no assurances that such reimbursements will occur. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Future Electric System Improvements” in Appendix A hereto for further discussion on the TAC reimbursement.
The following table sets forth the expected sources of funds for the two components of the Project.
Sources of Funds Distribution Transmission Totals Component Component 2017A Bond Proceeds $ 22,000,000 -- $ 22,000,000 District Reserves 10,000,000 $ 13,000,000 23,000,000 Totals $ 32,000,000 $ 13,000,000 $ 45,000,000
The District may substitute a component of the Project with a transmission component or add a transmission component to the Project upon delivery of an opinion of Bond Counsel stating, in substance, that such substitution or addition, as applicable will not, in and of itself, adversely affect the exclusion of interest on the 2017A Bonds from federal income taxation and from state income taxation.
A final revised environmental impact report for the Project dated September 21, 2016 was prepared and was certified by the Board of Directors on October 4, 2016. No challenges to the final revised environmental impact report have been filed. The District expects to obtain all other permits and approvals necessary to construct the Project. The District expects to commence construction of the Project in 2017 and expects that the Project will be completed in 2019.
5 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
The following is an estimateof the sources and uses of 2017A Bond proceeds.
Sources(1) Principal Amount of 2017A Bonds $ Plus/Less Net Original Issue Premium/Discount TOTAL $
Uses(1) Deposit to Acquisition Fund $ Underwriters’ Discount Deposit to Costs of Issuance Fund(2) TOTAL $
(1) Amounts rounded to the nearest dollar. (2) Includes fees for Trustee and Municipal Advisor, legal fees, premiums for the Policy and the Reserve Surety Policy, printing costs, rating agency fees and other costs of delivery.
THE 2017A BONDS
Terms of the 2017A Bonds
The 2017A Bonds will be issued in the aggregate principal amount of $19,990,000* and will be dated as of the date of issuance. Interest on the 2017A Bonds is payable by check or draft of the Trustee mailed by first class mail on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing October 1, 2017 (each an “Interest Payment Date”). Interest on the 2017A Bonds is payable on each Interest Payment Date to the person whose name appears on the Registration Books as the Owner thereof as of the Record Date immediately preceding each such Interest Payment Date, such interest to be paid by check of the Trustee sent by first class mail on the applicable Interest Payment Date to the Owner at the address of such Owner as it appears on the Registration Books (except that in the case of an Owner of $1,000,000 or more in principal amount, such payment may, at such Owner’s option, be made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account in the United States in accordance with written instructions provided to the Trustee by such Owner prior to the Record Date). Principal of and premium (if any) on any 2017A Bond will be paid by check of the Trustee upon presentation and surrender thereof at maturity or upon the prior redemption thereof, at the Office of the Trustee. Both the principal of and interest and premium (if any) on the 2017A Bonds will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
Interest on the 2017A Bonds will accrue at the rates per annum and will mature on the dates set forth on the inside front cover page of this Official Statement. Interest on the 2017A Bonds will be computed based on a year consisting of 360 days and twelve 30-day months. Individual purchases will be made in principal amounts of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof.
Principal of the 2017A Bonds is payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the Office of the Trustee in San Francisco, California.
Redemption of 2017A Bonds
Optional Redemption. The 2017A Bonds with stated maturities on or after October 1, 20__ are subject to redemption prior to their respective stated maturities, as a whole or in part on any date as directed by the Authority in a written request to the Trustee at least 35 days (or such lesser number of days acceptable to the Trustee in the sole discretion of the Trustee, such notice for the sole convenience of the Trustee) prior to
* Preliminary, subject to change.
6 such date and by lot within each maturity in integral multiples of $5,000, on or after October 1, 20__, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without premium.
Extraordinary Redemption from Insurance or Eminent Domain Proceeds. The 2017A Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption prior to their respective stated maturities, as a whole or in part on any date in the order of maturity and within maturities as directed by the District in a written request to the Trustee at least 35 days (or such lesser number of days acceptable to the Trustee in the sole discretion of the Trustee, such notice for the convenience of the Trustee) prior to such date and by lot within each maturity in integral multiples of $5,000 from Net Proceeds, upon the terms and conditions of, and as provided for in the Indenture and the Installment Purchase Agreement, at a Redemption Price equal to the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without premium.
Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. The 2017A Bonds with stated maturities on October 1, 20__ are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in part (by lot) on each October 1 on and after October 1, 20__, in integral multiples of $5,000 at a Redemption Price of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium, in accordance with the following schedule:
Redemption Date Principal (October 1) Amount $
* Final Maturity.
Notice of Redemption
Notice of redemption will be mailed by first class mail not less than 20 days before any Redemption Date, to the respective Owners of any 2017A Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses appearing on the Registration Books and to the Securities Depositories and the Information Services; provided, however, that so long as the 2017A Bonds are registered in the name of the Nominee, notices of redemption shall be provided in such manner as complies with the requirements of DTC, and, provided further, that such notice may be cancelled by the Authority upon written request delivered to the Trustee not less than 5 days prior to such Redemption Date. Each notice of redemption will state the date of notice, the redemption date, the place or places of redemption, the Redemption Price, will designate the maturities, CUSIP numbers, if any, and, if less than all 2017A Bonds of any such maturity are to be redeemed, the serial numbers of the 2017A Bonds of such maturity to be redeemed by giving the individual number of each 2017A Bond or by stating that all 2017A Bonds between two stated numbers, both inclusive, have been called for redemption and, in the case of 2017A Bonds to be redeemed in part only, the respective portions of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. Each such notice will also state that on the redemption date there will become due and payable on each of said 2017A Bonds or parts thereof designated for redemption the Redemption Price thereof or of said specified portion of the principal thereof in the case of a 2017A Bond to be redeemed in part only, together with, interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, and that (provided that moneys for redemption have been deposited with the Trustee) from and after such redemption date interest thereon will cease to accrue, and will require that such 2017A Bonds be then surrendered to the Trustee. Neither the failure to receive such notice nor any defect in the notice or the mailing thereof will affect the validity of the redemption of any 2017A Bond. Notice of redemption of 2017A Bonds will be given by the Trustee, at the expense of the Authority, for and on behalf of the Authority.
With respect to any notice of optional redemption of 2017A Bonds, such notice may state that such redemption is conditional upon the receipt by the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for such redemption of moneys sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such 2017A Bonds to be redeemed
7 and that, if such moneys have not been so received, said notice will be of no force and effect and the Trustee will not be required to redeem such 2017A Bonds. In the event that such notice of redemption contains such a condition and such moneys are not so received, the redemption will not be made, and the Trustee will within a reasonable time thereafter give notice, in the manner in which the notice of redemption was given, that such moneys were not so received.
Selection of 2017A Bonds for Redemption
Whenever provision is made in the Indenture for the redemption of less than all of the 2017A Bonds, the Trustee will select the 2017A Bonds for redemption as a whole or in part on any date as directed by the Authority and by lot within each maturity in integral multiples of $5,000 in accordance with the Indenture. The Trustee will promptly notify the Authority in writing of the numbers of the 2017A Bonds or portions thereof so selected for redemption.
Partial Redemption of Bonds
Upon surrender of any 2017A Bond redeemed in part only, the Authority will execute and the Trustee will authenticate and deliver to the Owner thereof, at the expense of the Authority, a new 2017A Bond or 2017A Bonds of authorized denominations equal in aggregate principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the 2017A Bonds surrendered and of the same series, interest rate and maturity.
Effect of Redemption of Bonds
Notice of redemption having been duly given as set forth in the Indenture, and moneys for payment of the redemption price of, together with interest accrued to the date fixed for redemption on, the 2017A Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption being held by the Trustee, on the redemption date designated in such notice, the 2017A Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption will become due and payable, interest on the 2017A Bonds so called for redemption will cease to accrue, said 2017A Bonds (or portions thereof) will cease to be entitled to any benefit or security under the Indenture, and the Owners of said 2017A Bonds will have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of the redemption price thereof. The Trustee will, upon surrender for payment of any of the 2017A Bonds to be redeemed on their Redemption Dates, pay such 2017A Bonds at the Redemption Price.
All 2017A Bonds redeemed pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture will be canceled upon surrender thereof.
Book-Entry Only System
One fully-registered 2017A Bond for each maturity will be issued in the principal amount of such 2017A Bond. Such 2017A Bonds will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. and will be deposited with DTC.
The District may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, the 2017A Bonds will be printed and delivered and will be governed by the provisions of the Indenture with respect to payment of principal and interest and rights of exchange and transfer.
The District cannot and does not give any assurances that DTC participants or others will distribute payments with respect to the 2017A Bonds received by DTC or its nominee as the registered Owner, or any redemption or other notices, to the Beneficial Owners, or that they will do so on a timely basis, or that DTC will service and act in the manner described in this Official Statement. See Appendix E hereto for additional information concerning DTC.
8 Transfers and Exchanges Upon Termination of Book-Entry Only System
Any 2017A Bond may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred on the Registration Books by the person in whose name it is registered, in person or by his or her duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of such 2017A Bond at the Office of the Trustee for cancellation, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument of transfer, duly executed in a form acceptable to the Trustee. The Trustee is not required to register the transfer of any 2017A Bond during the period in which the Trustee is selecting 2017A Bonds for redemption and any 2017A Bond that has been selected for redemption.
Whenever any 2017A Bond or 2017A Bonds is surrendered for transfer, the Authority will execute and the Trustee will authenticate and deliver a new 2017A Bond or 2017A Bonds of authorized denomination or denominations for a like series and aggregate principal amount of the same maturity. The Trustee will require the 2017A Bond Owner requesting such transfer to pay any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer. Following any transfer of 2017A Bonds, the Trustee will cancel and destroy the 2017A Bonds it has received.
The 2017A Bonds may be exchanged at the Office of the Trustee for a like aggregate principal amount of other authorized denominations of the same series and maturity. The Trustee is not required to exchange any 2017A Bond during the period in which the Trustee is selecting 2017A Bonds for redemption and any 2017A Bond that has been selected for redemption. The Trustee will require the 2017A Bond Owner requesting such exchange to pay any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange. Following any exchange of 2017A Bonds, the Trustee will cancel and destroy the 2017A Bonds it has received.
9 Debt Service Schedule
Set forth below is a table of the annual Series 2017A Installment Payments and principal of and interest on the 2015A Electric System Bonds.
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT Debt Service Schedule
2017A Bonds Outstanding Electric System March 31 Principal Interest Total Bonds(1)(2) Total 2018 $ $ $ $ 4,828,413 $ 2019 4,824,563 2020 4,820,163 2021 4,822,163 2022 4,544,663 2023 4,394,663 2024 4,391,163 2025 4,391,913 2026 4,386,413 2027 4,384,663 2028 4,376,163 2029 4,368,500 2030 4,368,750 2031 4,361,250 2032 4,356,000 2033 4,357,500 2034 4,345,000 2035 3,488,000 2036 3,484,000 2037 -- 2038 -- 2039 -- 2040 -- 2041 -- 2042 -- 2043 -- 2044 -- 2045 -- 2046 -- 2047 -- 2048 -- TOTAL $ $ $ $ 83,293,934 $
(1) Includes the principal of and interest on the 2015A Electric System Bonds. The District expects to prepay, from District reserves, the 2012 Electric System Bonds on or before the date of delivery of the 2017A Bonds. See Appendix A— “INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Other Outstanding Obligations.” (2) Total may not sum due to rounding. Source: District.
10 SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS
General
Pursuant to the Indenture, the Authority, for good and valuable consideration, has unconditionally assigned and pledged to the Trustee without recourse all of its rights to receive the Authority Revenues and to enforce the Installment Purchase Agreement upon an event of default thereunder for the benefit of the Owners of the 2017A Bonds, for the purpose of securing: (a) the payment of the principal of and the interest and premium on the 2017A Bonds under the terms of the Indenture; and (b) all of the rights, title, and interest of the Authority in the Installment Purchase Agreement, including all rights of the Authority to receive payments thereunder and all rights of the Authority thereunder as may be necessary to enforce compliance with said provisions (including enforcement of payment obligations and rate covenants contained in the Installment Purchase Agreement) or otherwise to protect the interest of the Owners of the 2017A Bonds, subject to the terms of the Indenture, and excepting therefrom any rights to indemnification or to receive notices thereunder.
The 2017A Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority. The 2017A Bonds are payable solely from Authority Revenues and from certain other amounts on deposit in funds and accounts under the Indenture. Authority Revenues consist primarily of Series 2017A Installment Payments received from the District pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement. See the caption “—Revenue Pledge Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments.”
The 2017A Bonds do not constitute a charge against the general credit of the Authority. The 2017A Bonds are not secured by a legal or equitable pledge of, or charge or lien upon, any property of the Authority or any of its income or receipts except payments under the Installment Purchase Agreement and other moneys pledged by the Authority under the Indenture. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State or any public agency thereof or any member of the Authority is pledged to the payment of the principal amount or redemption price of, or interest on, the 2017A Bonds. The Authority has no taxing power. The 2017A Bonds do not constitute a debt, liability or obligation of the State or any public agency thereof (other than the Authority) or any member of the Authority in contravention of any State constitutional or statutory provision.
Revenue Pledge Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments
Pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement, the District is obligated to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments as the purchase price for certain capital improvements described in the Installment Purchase Agreement. THE OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT TO MAKE THE SERIES 2017A INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS IS A SPECIAL OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT PAYABLE SOLELY FROM NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES OF THE DISTRICT AND OTHER FUNDS DESCRIBED IN THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DEBT OF THE DISTRICT OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR OF ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY DEBT LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OBLIGATION FOR WHICH THE DISTRICT IS OBLIGATED TO LEVY OR PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION OR FOR WHICH THE DISTRICT HAS LEVIED OR PLEDGED ANY FORM OF TAXATION.
In order to carry out and effectuate the pledge and lien contained in the Installment Purchase Agreement, the District has agreed and covenanted that the Electric System Revenues shall be deposited when and as received in a special fund designated as the “Electric System Revenue Fund” which fund has been established and which fund the District has agreed and covenanted to maintain and to hold separate and apart from other funds so long as the Series 2017A Installment Payments remain unpaid.
All amounts on deposit in the Electric System Revenue Fund and the Rate Stabilization Fund have been irrevocably pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments as provided in the Installment Purchase Agreement. Such pledge constitutes a first lien on, subject to application of amounts on
11 deposit therein as permitted in the Installment Purchase Agreement, the Electric System Revenue Fund and the Rate Stabilization Fund for the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and all other parity Contracts and Bonds (as such terms are defined in the Installment Purchase Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Installment Purchase Agreement.
The District will, from the moneys in the Electric System Revenue Fund, pay all Operation and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System (including amounts reasonably required to be set aside in contingency reserves for Operation and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System, the payment of which is not then immediately required) as such Electric System Operation and Maintenance Costs become due and payable. The Net Electric System Revenues will be set aside by the District as set forth in the Installment Purchase Agreement to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments and parity Contracts and Bonds.
The obligation of the District to make the Series 2017A Installment Payments from Net Electric System Revenues is on a parity with the obligation of the District to pay debt service for certain bonds, which after the prepayment of the 2012 Electric System Bonds from District reserves, as described herein, will be outstanding in the approximate aggregate principal amount of $55,700,000. See Appendix A— “INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the captions “THE DISTRICT—Other Outstanding Obligations” and “—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage.”
Electric System Revenues. Electric System Revenues are defined under the Installment Purchase Agreement to include all income, rents, rates, fees, charges and other moneys derived from or attributable the ownership or operation of the Electric System calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all income, rents, rates, fees, charges, business interruption insurance proceeds or other moneys derived by the District from the sale, furnishing and supplying of electric generation, transmission and distribution through the facilities of or in the conduct or operation of the business of the Electric System; plus all income, rents, rates, fees, charges, business interruption insurance proceeds or other moneys derived by the District under any contract for the sale of power, energy, transmission or other services from the Electric System or any part thereof or any contractual arrangement with respect to the use of the Electric System or any part thereof or the services, output or capacity thereof; connection charges or similar charges related to the Electric System; plus payments received by the District in connection with any commodity swaps related to the Electric System, including Commodity Swaps; the earnings on and income derived from the investment of the amounts described above, and from investment of amounts in the Electric System Revenue Fund; plus the earnings on and income derived from investment of the District reserves allocated to the Electric System; plus all amounts transferred from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the Electric System Revenue Fund during any Fiscal Year in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement. Electric System Revenues do not include in all cases any amounts transferred from the Electric System Revenue Fund to the Rate Stabilization Fund during any Fiscal Year in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement, customer deposits or any other deposits or advances subject to refund until such deposits or advances have become the property of the District, any proceeds of taxes restricted by law to be used by the District to pay obligations of the District other than Bonds or Contracts and revenues of the Water System or Hydroelectric System. In addition, Electric System Revenues do not include revenues with respect to any electric generation or transmission facilities of the District which are not a part of the Electric System as determined in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement. See the definition of Electric System set forth in Appendix C— “SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS” hereto for a description of the ability of the Board of the District to elect to include or exclude generation or transmission facilities in the Electric System.
Rate Covenant Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments
The District has covenanted in the Installment Purchase Agreement to fix and prescribe rates and charges for Energy Service which are reasonably expected to be sufficient to yield during such Fiscal Year Net Electric System Revenues (not including amounts transferred from the Rate Stabilization Fund pursuant to the
12 Installment Purchase Agreement in excess of twenty percent (20%) of Debt Service payable in such Fiscal Year) which will equal one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Debt Service payable in such Fiscal Year.
The District may make adjustments from time to time in such rates and charges and may make such classifications thereof as it deems necessary, but will not reduce the rates and charges then in effect unless the Net Electric System from such reduced rates and charges will at all times be sufficient to meet the requirements described in the prior paragraph.
Failure to produce Net Electric System Revenues to equal one hundred twenty percent (120%) of Debt Service at the end of a Fiscal Year is not an Event of Default under the Installment Purchase Agreement so long as the District complies with the covenant described above. Such failure may, however, affect the ability of the District to issue Bonds or incur Contracts payable from Net Electric System Revenues on a parity with the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
For purposes of the covenant set forth above, any Policy Costs due and owing shall be treated as Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
Limitations on District Parity and Superior Obligations; Subordinate Obligations
Additional Obligations Superior to Series 2017A Installment Payments. The District has covenanted in the Installment Purchase Agreement that it will not, so long as any Series 2017A Installment Payments are outstanding, issue or incur any obligations payable from the Revenues superior to the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Additional Obligations on a Parity with Series 2017A Installment Payments. The District may at any time execute any Contract or issue any Bonds, as the case may be, in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement; provided:
(i) The Net Electric System Revenues for either the most recent audited Fiscal Year or any consecutive twelve calendar month period during the eighteen calendar month period preceding the date of adoption by the Board of Directors of the District of the resolution authorizing the issuance of such Bonds or the date of the execution of such Contract, as the case may be, as evidenced by both a calculation prepared by the District and a special report prepared by an Independent Certified Public Accountant or an Independent Financial Consultant on such calculation on file with the District, shall have produced a sum equal to at least one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Debt Service for such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period, as applicable; and
(ii) At the option of the District:
(1) the Net Electric System Revenues for either the most recent audited Fiscal Year or any consecutive twelve calendar month period during the eighteen calendar month period preceding the date of the execution of such Contract or the date of adoption by the Board of Directors of the District of the resolution authorizing the issuance of such Bonds, as the case may be, including adjustments to give effect as of the first day of such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period to increases or decreases in rates and charges for the Energy Service approved and in effect as of the date of calculation, as evidenced by a calculation prepared by the District, shall have produced a sum equal to at least one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Debt Service for such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period plus the Debt Service which would have been payable on any Contracts executed or Bonds issued since the end of such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period assuming such Contracts had been executed or Bonds had been issued at the beginning of such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period, plus the Debt Service which would have been payable had such Contract been executed or Bonds been issued at the beginning of such audited Fiscal Year or such twelve month period, as applicable; or
13 (2) the estimated Net Electric System Revenues for the then current Fiscal Year and for each Fiscal Year thereafter to and including the first complete Fiscal Year after the latest Date of Operation of any uncompleted Parity Project previously financed or being financed from the proceeds of Bond or Contracts, as evidenced by an Engineer’s Report on file with the District, plus (after giving effect to the completion of all such uncompleted Parity Projects and the Net Electric System Revenues to be derived from such Parity Projects) an allowance for estimated Net Electric System Revenues for each of such Fiscal Years arising from any increase in the rates and charges estimated to be fixed and prescribed for the Energy Service and which are economically feasible and reasonably considered necessary based on projected operations for such period, as evidenced by an Engineer’s Report on file with the District, shall produce a sum equal to at least one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the estimated Debt Service for each of such Fiscal Years, after giving effect, in either case, to the execution of all Contracts and the issuance of all Bonds estimated to be required to be executed or issued to pay the costs of completing all uncompleted Parity Projects within such Fiscal Years, assuming that all such Contracts and Bonds have maturities, interest rates and proportionate principal repayment provisions similar to the Contract that was first executed or the Bonds that were first issued for the purpose of acquiring and constructing any of such uncompleted Parity Projects.
For purposes of the foregoing requirements, Electric System Revenues in any Fiscal Year do not include any amounts transferred from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the Electric System Revenue Fund in excess of 20% of the Debt Service for such Fiscal Year. See also the caption “—Rate Stabilization Fund.”
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Bonds or Contracts may be issued or incurred to refund outstanding Bonds or Contracts if, after giving effect to the application of the proceeds thereof, total Debt Service will not be increased in any Fiscal Year in which Bonds or Contracts (outstanding on the date of issuance or incurrence of such refunding Bonds or Contracts, but excluding such refunding Bonds or Contracts) not being refunded are outstanding in an amount in excess of 10%.
For purposes of calculations set forth above with respect to the issuance of Bonds or the execution of Contracts, any Policy Costs due and owing shall be treated as Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
Subordinate Obligations. Nothing in the Installment Purchase Agreement prohibits the District from issuing bonds, notes or other obligations payable from Net Electric System Revenues subordinate to Bonds or Contracts. The Line of Credit is an unsecured obligation of the District and is not a Bond or Contract. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Other Outstanding Obligations.” The District has the right to secure other District obligations with a subordinate pledge of Electric System Revenues without compliance with the financial test set forth above. See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Future Electric System Improvements.”
Reserve Fund
The Insurer has made a commitment to issue, simultaneously with the initial issuance of the 2017A Bonds, the Reserve Surety Policy in the amount of $______(equal to the Reserve Requirement) for deposit in the Reserve Fund, effective as of the date of issuance of the 2017A Bonds. Under the terms of the Reserve Surety Policy, the Insurer will unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee to pay that portion of the scheduled payments of principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds that becomes due for payment but shall be unpaid by reason of nonpayment by the Authority.
See Appendix B—” DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS” under the caption “THE INDENTURE—REVENUES, FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS; PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST—Reserve Fund” for further information with respect to the Reserve Surety Policy.
14 Rate Stabilization Fund
There is continued under the Installment Purchase Agreement a special fund designated as the “Rate Stabilization Fund” to be held by the District in trust thereunder, which fund the District has pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments under the Installment Purchase Agreement and has agreed and covenanted to maintain and to hold separate and apart from other funds so long as any Series 2017A Installment Payments remain unpaid, including but not limited to the rate stabilization fund created with respect to the Water System and the Hydroelectric System. On the date of the issuance of the 2017A Bonds, approximately $1,000,000 will be on deposit in the Rate Stabilization Fund (which amount includes approximately $800,000 of monies collected in prior Fiscal Years and which are currently recorded as unrealized revenue on the District’s financial statements as described in Appendix A under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION—District Reserves”). Money transferred by the District from the Electric System Revenue Fund to the Rate Stabilization Fund in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement will be held in the Rate Stabilization Fund and applied in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement.
The District may withdraw all or any portion of the amounts on deposit in the Rate Stabilization Fund and transfer such amounts to the Electric System Revenue Fund for application in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement or, in the event that all or a portion of the 2017A Bonds are discharged in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement, transfer all or any portion of such amounts for application in accordance with the Installment Purchase Agreement. Amounts transferred from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the Electric System Revenue Fund pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement during or within 270 days after a Fiscal Year, may be taken into account as Electric System Revenues for purposes of the calculations described under the captions “—Rate Covenant” and “—Additional Indebtedness” in such Fiscal Year.
Under certain circumstances, moneys received in one Fiscal Year may be required or permitted by GAAP to be recorded as revenue in a subsequent Fiscal Year, regardless of whether such moneys have been deposited in the Rate Stabilization Fund. See “APPENDIX A-1 – MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.”
BOND INSURANCE
Bond Insurance Policy
Concurrently with the issuance of the 2017A Bonds, Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. will issue its Municipal Bond Insurance Policy for the 2017A Bonds. The Policy guarantees the scheduled payment of principal of and interest on the 2017A Bonds when due as set forth in the form of the Policy included as Appendix G to this Official Statement.
The Policy is not covered by any insurance security or guaranty fund established under New York, California, Connecticut or Florida insurance law.
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AGM is a New York domiciled financial guaranty insurance company and an indirect subsidiary of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (“AGL”), a Bermuda-based holding company whose shares are publicly traded and are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AGO.” AGL, through its operating subsidiaries, provides credit enhancement products to the U.S. and global public finance, infrastructure and structured finance markets. Neither AGL nor any of its shareholders or affiliates, other than AGM, is obligated to pay any debts of AGM or any claims under any insurance policy issued by AGM.
15 AGM’s financial strength is rated “AA” (stable outlook) by S&P Global Ratings, a business unit of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”), “AA+” (stable outlook) by Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. (“KBRA”) and “A2” (stable outlook) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”). Each rating of AGM should be evaluated independently. An explanation of the significance of the above ratings may be obtained from the applicable rating agency. The above ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold any security, and such ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, including withdrawal initiated at the request of AGM in its sole discretion. In addition, the rating agencies may at any time change AGM’s long-term rating outlooks or place such ratings on a watch list for possible downgrade in the near term. Any downward revision or withdrawal of any of the above ratings, the assignment of a negative outlook to such ratings or the placement of such ratings on a negative watch list may have an adverse effect on the market price of any security guaranteed by AGM. AGM only guarantees scheduled principal and scheduled interest payments payable by the issuer of bonds insured by AGM on the date(s) when such amounts were initially scheduled to become due and payable (subject to and in accordance with the terms of the relevant insurance policy), and does not guarantee the market price or liquidity of the securities it insures, nor does it guarantee that the ratings on such securities will not be revised or withdrawn.
Current Financial Strength Ratings. On June 26, 2017, S&P issued a research update report in which it affirmed AGM’s financial strength rating of “AA” (stable outlook). AGM can give no assurance as to any further ratings action that S&P may take.
On December 14, 2016, KBRA issued a financial guaranty surveillance report in which it affirmed AGM’s insurance financial strength rating of “AA+” (stable outlook). AGM can give no assurance as to any further ratings action that KBRA may take.
On August 8, 2016, Moody’s published a credit opinion affirming its existing insurance financial strength rating of “A2” (stable outlook) on AGM. AGM can give no assurance as to any further ratings action that Moody’s may take.
For more information regarding AGM’s financial strength ratings and the risks relating thereto, see AGL’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
Capitalization of AGM. At March 31, 2017:
The policyholders’ surplus of AGM was approximately $2,204 million.
The contingency reserves of AGM and its indirect subsidiary Municipal Assurance Corp. (“MAC”) (as described below) were approximately $1,263 million. Such amount includes 100% of AGM’s contingency reserve and 60.7% of MAC’s contingency reserve.
The net unearned premium reserves of AGM and its subsidiaries (as described below) were approximately $1,349 million. Such amount includes (i) 100% of the net unearned premium reserves of AGM and AGM’s wholly owned subsidiary Assured Guaranty (Europe) Ltd. and (ii) 60.7% of the net unearned premium reserve of MAC.
The policyholders’ surplus of AGM and the contingency reserves and net unearned premium reserves of AGM and MAC were determined in accordance with statutory accounting principles. The net unearned premium reserves of Assured Guaranty (Europe) Ltd were determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference. Portions of the following documents filed by AGL with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that relate to AGM are incorporated by reference into this Official Statement and shall be deemed to be a part hereof:
16 (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (filed by AGL with the SEC on February 24, 2017); and
(ii) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 (filed by AGL with the SEC on May 5, 2017).
All consolidated financial statements of AGM and all other information relating to AGM included in, or as exhibits to, documents filed by AGL with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, excluding Current Reports or portions thereof “furnished” under Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of Form 8-K, after the filing of the last document referred to above and before the termination of the offering of the 2017A Bonds shall be deemed incorporated by reference into this Official Statement and to be a part hereof from the respective dates of filing such documents. Copies of materials incorporated by reference are available over the internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, at AGL’s website at http://www.assuredguaranty.com, or will be provided upon request to Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.: 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019, Attention: Communications Department (telephone (212) 974- 0100). Except for the information referred to above, no information available on or through AGL’s website shall be deemed to be part of or incorporated in this Official Statement.
Any information regarding AGM included herein under the caption “BOND INSURANCE – Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.” or included in a document incorporated by reference herein (collectively, the “AGM Information”) shall be modified or superseded to the extent that any subsequently included AGM Information (either directly or through incorporation by reference) modifies or supersedes such previously included AGM Information. Any AGM Information so modified or superseded shall not constitute a part of this Official Statement, except as so modified or superseded.
Miscellaneous Matters. AGM makes no representation regarding the 2017A Bonds or the advisability of investing in the 2017A Bonds. In addition, AGM has not independently verified, makes no representation regarding, and does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this Official Statement or any information or disclosure contained herein, or omitted herefrom, other than with respect to the accuracy of the information regarding AGM supplied by AGM and presented under this caption “BOND INSURANCE.”
THE AUTHORITY
The Authority is a joint exercise of powers agency organized under the provisions of the Act and the Joint Powers Agreement to provide for the financing and refinancing of capital improvement projects of the District by exercising the powers referred to in the Joint Powers Agreement, and any other transaction authorized by law. The Authority was created on May 21, 2015. Under the Act and the Joint Powers Agreement, the Authority has the power to issue bonds to pay the costs of public capital improvements. The Board of Directors of the Authority consists of the members of the Board of Directors of the District.
THE DISTRICT
Appendix A hereto presents information relating to the District and the Electric System. The Series 2017A Installment Payments are payable solely from Net Electric System Revenues. No revenues of the District’s Water System and Hydroelectric System are pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and no Net Electric System Revenues are pledged to the payment of obligations of the District’s Water System and Hydroelectric System.
APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The validity of the 2017A Bonds is subject to the approval of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Sacramento, California, acting as Bond Counsel. The form of such legal opinion is
17 attached hereto as Appendix D and such legal opinion will be attached to each 2017A Bond. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement or other offering materials relating to the 2017A Bonds and expressly disclaims any duty to advise the Owners of the 2017A Bonds as to matters related to this Official Statement.
Certain legal matters will be passed on for the Underwriters by their counsel Gilmore & Bell, P.C., Salt Lake City, Utah (“Underwriters’ Counsel”), for the Authority and the District by Phillip R. McMurray, Esq., General Counsel to the Authority and the District, for the Insurer by its counsel and for the Trustee by its counsel. Payment of the fees of Bond Counsel and Underwriters’ Counsel is contingent upon issuance of the 2017A Bonds.
LITIGATION
The Authority
There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, regulatory agency, public board or body, pending or, to the knowledge of the Authority, threatened against the Authority affecting the existence of the Authority or the titles of its officers to their respective offices or seeking to restrain or to enjoin the sale or delivery of the 2017A Bonds, the application of the proceeds thereof in accordance with the Indenture, or in any way contesting or affecting the action of the Authority contemplated by any of said documents, or in any way contesting the completeness or accuracy of this Official Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, or contesting the powers of the Authority or its authority with respect to the 2017A Bonds or any action of the Authority contemplated by any of said documents.
The District
See Appendix A—“INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT” under the caption “LITIGATION” for information with respect to litigation affecting the District.
TAX MATTERS
In the opinion of Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, California, Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, and assuming the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants and requirements described herein, interest (and original issue discount) on the 2017A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest (and original issue discount) on the 2017A Bonds is exempt from State of California personal income tax. Bond Counsel notes that, with respect to corporations, interest on the 2017A Bonds may be included as an adjustment in the calculation of alternative minimum taxable income, which may affect the alternative minimum tax liability of such corporations.
Bond Counsel’s opinion as to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the 2017A Bonds is based upon certain representations of fact and certifications made by the District and others and is subject to the condition that the District complies with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the 2017A Bonds to assure that interest on the 2017A Bonds will not become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Failure to comply with such requirements of the Code might cause interest on the 2017A Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes retroactive to the date of issuance of the 2017A Bonds. The District has covenanted to comply with all such requirements.
18 The difference between the issue price of a 2017A Bond (the first price at which a substantial amount of the 2017A Bonds of a maturity is to be sold to the public) and the stated redemption price at maturity with respect to the 2017A Bond (to the extent the redemption price at maturity is greater than the issue price) constitutes original issue discount. Original issue discount accrues under a constant yield method, and original issue discount will accrue to a 2017A Bond Owner before receipt of cash attributable to such excludable income. The amount of original issue discount deemed received by a 2017A Bond Owner will increase the 2017A Bond Owner’s basis in the applicable 2017A Bond. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, the amount of original issue discount that accrues to the 2017A Bond Owner is excluded from gross income of such 2017A Bond Owner for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, and is exempt from State of California personal income tax.
The amount by which a 2017A Bond Owner’s original basis for determining loss on sale or exchange in the applicable 2017A Bond (generally, the purchase price) exceeds the amount payable on maturity (or on an earlier call date) constitutes amortizable bond premium, which must be amortized under Section 171 of the Code; such amortizable bond premium reduces the 2017A Bond Owner’s basis in the applicable 2017A Bond (and the amount of tax-exempt interest received with respect to the 2017A Bonds), and is not deductible for federal income tax purposes. The basis reduction as a result of the amortization of bond premium may result in a 2017A Bond Owner realizing a taxable gain when a 2017A Bond is sold by the Owner for an amount equal to or less (under certain circumstances) than the original cost of the 2017A Bond to the Owner. Purchasers of the 2017A Bonds should consult their own tax advisors as to the treatment, computation and collateral consequences of amortizable bond premium.
The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has initiated an expanded program for auditing tax exempt bond issues, including both random and targeted audits. It is possible that the 2017A Bonds will be selected for audit by the IRS. It is also possible that the market value of the 2017A Bonds might be affected as a result of such an audit of the 2017A Bonds (or by an audit of similar municipal obligations). No assurance can be given that in the course of an audit, as a result of an audit, or otherwise, Congress or the IRS might not change the Code (or interpretation thereof) subsequent to the issuance of the 2017A Bonds to the extent that it adversely affects the exclusion from gross income of interest on the 2017A Bonds or their market value.
It is possible that subsequent to the issuance of the 2017A Bonds there might be federal, state, or local statutory changes (or judicial or regulatory interpretations of federal, state, or local law) that affect the federal, state, or local tax treatment of the 2017A Bonds or the market value of the 2017A Bonds. Recently, proposed legislative changes have been introduced in Congress, which, if enacted, could result in additional federal income or state tax being imposed on owners of tax-exempt state or local obligations, such as the 2017A Bonds. The introduction or enactment of any of such changes could adversely affect the market value or liquidity of the 2017A Bonds. No assurance can be given that subsequent to the issuance of the 2017A Bonds such changes (or other changes) will not be introduced or enacted or interpretations will not occur. Before purchasing any of the 2017A Bonds, all potential purchasers should consult their tax advisors regarding possible statutory changes or judicial or regulatory changes or interpretations, and their collateral tax consequences relating to the 2017A Bonds.
Bond Counsel’s opinions may be affected by actions taken (or not taken) or events occurring (or not occurring) after the date hereof. Bond Counsel has not undertaken to determine, or to inform any person, whether any such actions or events are taken or do occur. The Indenture, the Installment Purchase Agreement and the Tax Certificate relating to the 2017A Bonds permit certain actions to be taken or to be omitted if a favorable opinion of Bond Counsel is provided with respect thereto. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion as to the effect on the exclusion from gross income of interest for federal income tax purposes with respect to any 2017A Bond if any such action is taken or omitted based upon the advice of counsel other than Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation.
19 Although Bond Counsel has rendered an opinion that interest on the 2017A Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes provided that the District continues to comply with certain requirements of the Code, the ownership of the 2017A Bonds and the accrual or receipt of interest on the 2017A Bonds may otherwise affect the tax liability of certain persons. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such tax consequences. Accordingly, before purchasing any of the 2017A Bonds, all potential purchasers should consult their tax advisors with respect to collateral tax consequences relating to the 2017A Bonds.
A copy of the proposed form of opinion of Bond Counsel is attached hereto as Appendix D.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
The District has covenanted in a Continuing Disclosure Certificate for the benefit of the holders and beneficial owners of the 2017A Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the District by not later than the 270 days following the end of the District’s Fiscal Year (currently its Fiscal Year ends on March 31) (the “Annual Report”), commencing with the report for Fiscal Year ending March 31, 2018, to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events, and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain other enumerated events, if material. The Annual Report and the notices of enumerated events will be filed by the District with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access system. The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report and the notice of material events is set forth in Appendix F—”FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE.” These covenants have been made in order to assist the Underwriters in complying with Section (b)(5) of Rule 15c2-12 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Over the past five years, the District has been subject to obligations under various continuing disclosure certificates (the “Prior Continuing Disclosure Undertakings”). Pursuant to the Prior Continuing Disclosure Undertakings, the District agreed to file its audited financial reports, certain operating data with respect to the Water System, the Hydroelectric System and Electric System, as well as notices of certain enumerated events.
The District filed its audited financial statements, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (“CAFR”) and updates to required operating data in accordance with the Prior Continuing Disclosure Undertakings in each of the past five years. In certain years, however, the audited financial statements and the CAFRs were not properly linked on EMMA to all applicable District obligations.
On June 6, 2014, the District filed supplements to its continuing disclosure reports for the last five fiscal years with respect certain obligations (since refunded) of the Electric System, the Water System and Hydroelectric System to include the balance in the reserve funds established for such obligations as of December 31 of such fiscal years. On June 12, 2014, the District filed supplemental notices with respect to certain Electric System obligations (since refunded), reflecting the then-current ratings on such obligations. Other than such ratings change notices described in the prior sentence, the District is not aware of any events in the last five years which may have required the filing of significant event notices under the Prior Continuing Disclosure Undertakings that were not filed.
The District believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with the Prior Continuing Disclosure Undertakings.
In order to ensure compliance by the District with its continuing disclosure undertakings in the future, the Board of Directors approved disclosure procedures on August 5, 2014 (the “Disclosure Procedures”). Pursuant to the Disclosure Procedures, the Chief Financial Officer is required to take steps to ensure that continuing disclosure filings are prepared and filed in a timely manner. A copy of the Disclosure Procedures has been provided to the Underwriters and is available from the Chief Financial Officer of the District at 744 West 20th Street, Merced, California Telephone: (209) 722-5761.
20 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR
The District has retained Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc., Irvine, California, as municipal advisor (the “Municipal Advisor”) in connection with the issuance of the 2017A Bonds. The Municipal Advisor has not undertaken to make an independent verification or to assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or fairness of the information contained in this Official Statement. The fees being paid to the Municipal Advisor are contingent upon the issuance of the 2017A Bonds.
The Municipal Advisor is an independent advisory firm and is not engaged in the business of underwriting, trading or distributing municipal or other public securities.
RATINGS
The District expects that S&P will assign the 2017A Bonds the rating of “AA” (stable outlook) based upon the delivery of the Policy by AGM at the time of issuance of the 2017A Bonds. See the caption “BOND INSURANCE” for a discussion of recent rating actions taken with respect to AGM. S&P will assign the 2017A Bonds the rating of “A” (stable outlook) notwithstanding the delivery of the Policy. There is no assurance that any credit rating given to the 2017A Bonds will be maintained for any period of time or that a rating may not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by S&P, if, in the judgment of S&P, circumstances so warrant. Any downward revision or withdrawal of a rating may have an adverse effect on the market price of the 2017A Bonds. Such ratings reflect only the views of S&P, and an explanation of the significance of such ratings may be obtained from S&P.
In providing a rating on the 2017A Bonds, S&P may have performed independent calculations of coverage ratios using its own internal formulas and methodology which may not reflect the provisions of the Installment Purchase Agreement. The District makes no representations as to any such calculations, and such calculations should not be construed as a representation by the District as to past or future compliance with any bond covenants, the availability of particular revenues for the payment of Debt Service or for any other purpose.
UNDERWRITING
The 2017A Bonds will be purchased by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citigroup”), as representative of itself and Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. (together, the “Underwriters”), pursuant to a Purchase Contract, dated July __, 2017 (the “Purchase Contract”), by and between the District and Citigroup, as representative. Under the Purchase Contract, the Underwriters have agreed to purchase all, but not less than all, of the 2017A Bonds for an aggregate purchase price of $______(representing the principal amount of the 2017A Bonds, less an Underwriters’ discount of $______, plus/less a net original issue premium/discount of $______). The Purchase Contract provides that the Underwriters will purchase all of the 2017A Bonds if any are purchased, the obligation to make such a purchase being subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Contract and the approval of certain legal matters by counsel.
The initial public offering prices stated on the inside front cover of this Official Statement may be changed from time to time by the Underwriters. The Underwriters may offer and sell the 2017A Bonds to certain dealers (including dealers depositing 2017A Bonds into investment trusts), dealer banks, banks acting as agents and others at prices lower than said public offering prices.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. has entered into a retail distribution agreement with each of TMC Bonds L.L.C. (“TMC”) and UBS Financial Services Inc. (“UBSFS”). Under these distribution agreements, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. may distribute municipal securities to retail investors through the financial advisor network of UBSFS and the electronic primary offering platform of TMC. As part of this arrangement, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. may compensate TMC (and TMC may compensate its electronic platform member firms) and UBSFS for their selling efforts with respect to the 2017A Bonds.
21 Citigroup and its affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment management, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Citigroup and its affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various investment banking services for the Authority and the District for which they received or will receive customary fees and expenses. In addition, certain affiliates of Citigroup are lenders, and in some cases agents or managers for the lenders, under credit and liquidity facilities.
In the ordinary course of their various business activities, Citigroup and its respective affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (which may include bank loans and/or credit default swaps) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve securities and instruments of the Authority and the District.
MISCELLANEOUS
Insofar as any statements made in this Official Statement involve matters of opinion or of estimates, whether or not expressly stated, they are set forth as such and not as representations of fact. No representation is made that any of such statements made will be realized. Neither this Official Statement nor any statement which may have been made verbally or in writing is to be construed as a contract with the Owners of the 2017A Bonds.
The execution and delivery of this Official Statement have been duly authorized by the Authority.
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
By: President
22 APPENDIX A
INFORMATION RELATING TO MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
The following information relates to the District and the District’s Electric System. In addition, the description of the District below includes information on operations of the District that are not part of its Electric System. The Series 2017A Installment Payments are payable solely from Electric System Revenues as described in the Official Statement under the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS— Revenue Pledge Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments.”
THE DISTRICT
General
The District is a California irrigation district organized in 1919 under the provisions of the Irrigation District Law (codified as Division 11 of the California Water Code). The District has the powers under the Irrigation District Law to, among other things, provide water, electricity and water-related recreation services. In connection therewith, the District has the powers of eminent domain, to contract, to construct works, to fix rates and charges for commodities or services furnished and to incur indebtedness.
The District owns and operates a retail electric system which serves portions of the District. The District is not the sole provider of retail electric service within the District. Currently the District serves approximately 9,000 customers within the District while the Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”), an investor owned utility serves the remaining customers within the electric service area of the District. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—General.”
The District owns, operates and maintains a Hydroelectric System, consisting of the New Exchequer Dam, which impounds the New Exchequer Reservoir (Lake McClure) and the McSwain Dam, which impounds the McSwain Reservoir (Lake McSwain). New Exchequer Reservoir and the McSwain Reservoir have storage capacities of approximately 1,024,600 acre feet and 9,730 acre-feet, respectively. Both dams, reservoirs and related hydroelectric facilities comprise the Merced River Hydroelectric Project. The Merced River Hydroelectric Project is licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”).
The District owns, operates and maintains a Water System which delivers water through approximately 720 miles of earthen and concrete-lined canals, and pipelines. The District owns approximately 215 well sites. See the caption “—Water System and Hydroelectric System” below.
The revenues of the Water System and Hydroelectric System are not pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and the Series 2017A Installment Payments are not payable from revenues of the District’s Water System or Hydroelectric System.
In 1994, the District established a storm water drainage district known as the Merced Irrigation District Drainage Improvement District #1 (the “Drainage District”). The District uses portions of its irrigation distribution system for urban storm drainage by routing natural stream flows and runoff from urban developments, away from populated areas. Drainage fees are assessed annually by the District and are collected through the County of Merced (the “County”) tax rolls but are not included in Electric System Revenues. See the caption “—Drainage District” below.
The District owns, operates and maintains five recreation areas adjacent to Lake McClure and Lake McSwain which consist of the Lake McSwain Recreation Area, located adjacent to Lake McSwain; McClure Point, Barrett Cove, Horseshoe Bend and Bagby Recreation Areas, all located adjacent to Lake McClure (collectively, the Parks and Recreation Facilities”). Revenues generated by the District’s Parks and Recreation Facilities are not included as Electric System Revenues. See the caption “—Parks and Recreation” below.
A-1 Service Area
The District is located in the central portion of the San Joaquin Valley and currently encompasses approximately 160,000 acres.
The District provides surface irrigation water to approximately 100,000 acres in eastern Merced County. At times, the District also provides water to lands within its sphere of influence, which among other areas, includes land within the Merced Groundwater Basin located in the eastern part of the County. In addition, the District provides water to the Stevinson Water District and to Merced National Wildlife Refuge.
The District owns and operates a retail electric system which serves portions of the District. The District is not the sole provider of retail electric service within the District. Currently the District serves approximately 9,000 customers within the District while PG&E, an investor owned utility, serves the remaining customers within the electric service area of the District. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—General.”
Governance and Management
The District is governed by an elected Board of Directors (the “Board”) composed of five persons serving staggered four year terms. The current directors and their terms are set forth below:
Director Expiration of Term Occupation Dave Long, President December 2019 Businessman Scott Koehn, Vice President December 2017 Businessman Kevin Gonzalves, Director December 2017 Farmer Jeff Marchini, Director December 2019 Farmer Billy Pimental, Director December 2017 Farmer
The management of the District is under the direction of its General Manager. The District is organized functionally into ten departments. The six operating departments are: Irrigation Operations, Facilities Maintenance, Energy Resources, Hydroelectric Project, Parks and Recreation, and Storm Drainage. The four support departments are: Finance, Administrative Services, Engineering and Planning. The operating departments also manage a storm drainage district, a ground water management program, and flood control on the Merced River. The following is the background of the District’s management staff involved in water resources, retail electric services and hydroelectric generation activities.
General Manager – John Sweigard: Mr. Sweigard joined the District in 2010 as its General Manager. Prior to joining the District, Mr. Sweigard served almost 13 years as the General Manager of Patterson Irrigation District. Mr. Sweigard is an active member of the United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage and was elected by his irrigation profession peers to their Board of Directors in 2011. Additionally, he was a longtime board member of the San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority (“SLDMWA”) and served on the SLDMWA Finance and Administration Committee and Operations and Maintenance Committee. Mr. Sweigard received his Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
Deputy General Manager, Water Supply/Rights – Hicham Eltal: Mr. Eltal serves as the Deputy General Manager, Water Supply/Rights and has over 26 years of experience in civil engineering work, including 22 years as a professional engineer in the California. Mr. Eltal is responsible for the compliance and protection of the District’s various water rights, including administering water resource-related activities involving water rights, supply, quality, marketing and resource development. Mr. Eltal is a Chairman of the Merced Area Groundwater Pool Interests (“MAGPI”), a member of the groundwater committee of the Association of California Water Agencies, and represents the District with respect to the Merced Integrated Regional Water Management Plan and various state and national committees for issues related to water supply
A-2 and water rights. Mr. Eltal is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Mr. Eltal received a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from California State University, Fullerton and is licensed as a professional civil engineer in California.
Deputy General Manager, Water Resources – Bryan Kelly: Mr. Kelly joined the District in August 2004 as a senior engineer with the Water Resources Department. Mr. Kelly is responsible for overseeing all of water resources engineering, construction, maintenance, operations and planning. In addition, Mr. Kelly is responsible for overseeing the District’s water resources related regulatory compliance. Mr. Kelly has more than 18 years of experience in planning, engineering, operations and management of irrigation and municipal infrastructure systems. Prior to joining the District, Mr. Kelly worked for ten years at a national environmental engineering firm where he served as a water resource project manager, lead engineer, staff manager and marketing lead. Mr. Kelly obtained his Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of New Orleans.
Deputy General Manager, Energy Resources – Don Ouchley: Mr. Ouchley joined the District in September 2011 as the Manager of Engineering and Operations for Energy Resources. Mr. Ouchley provides oversight for the general planning, direction, supervision of engineering, construction, operation and maintenance related to the Energy Resources Department, which includes the New Exchequer Dam and hydroelectric facilities. Mr. Ouchley has more than 46 years of experience in the public utility industry. Prior to joining the District, he served as a director with Beaches Energy Services, a municipal electric and gas utility in Jacksonville Beach, Florida, and as General Manager of Piedmont Municipal Power Agency in Greer, South Carolina. Mr. Ouchley has a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from City University, Seattle, Washington, and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University.
Chief Financial Officer – Brian Stubbert: Mr. Stubbert joined the District as Chief Financial Officer in March 2011. Mr. Stubbert is responsible for planning and directing the District’s financial activities, including budgeting, payroll, customer service and billing as well as developing and improving cost controls. He has over 20 years of experience in accounting, budgeting and auditing. Prior to joining the District, Mr. Stubbert served as Vice President of Accounting and Administration at Patterson Vegetable Co. Mr. Stubbert graduated from California State University, Stanislaus and is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Director of Administrative Services - Victor Moreno: Mr. Moreno joined the District as its Director of Administrative Services in January 2017. He is responsible for planning, directing and coordinating all of the District’s human resource, information technology and risk management activities, as well as implementing the goals, objectives, policies and procedures of the District’s Administrative Services Department. Mr. Moreno has an extensive background in investigations, risk management, safety and human resources, with over two decades of experience as a labor relations manager and as a corporate safety manager. Mr. Moreno obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from California State University, Stanislaus, a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Saint Mary's College of California and a Workplace Health and Safety Manager Certificate from the University of California, Davis. Mr. Moreno also maintains a certificate from the Human Resources Certification Institute as a Senior Professional in Human Resources.
General Counsel – Phillip R. McMurray: Prior to joining the District, Mr. McMurray served as an associate with Linneman, Burgess, Telles, Van Atta, Vierra, Rathmann, Whitehurst & Keene, with primary offices located in Los Banos and Dos Palos, California. Mr. McMurray has been General Counsel to the District since July 2011. Mr. McMurray received his Bachelor of Science in Agriculture Business and Plant Science from California State University, Fresno and his law degree from Lincoln Law School in Sacramento.
A-3 Budget Process
In approximately January of each year, District staff provides the Finance and Administration Committee with a draft budget including estimates of revenues and expenditures for operations for the upcoming Fiscal Year and holds two public meetings during which the draft budget is reviewed and adjustments are recommended. The Board typically holds meetings in February to review and consider a draft budget including estimates of revenues and expenditures for operations for the upcoming Fiscal Year and makes such revisions as it deems desirable. The Board typically adopts a final budget by the end of March or the beginning of April each year. The Board adopted its budget for Fiscal Year 2018 on February 10, 2017. The District’s Electric System rates are not subject to the requirements under Article XIIID of the California Constitution. See the caption “CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON APPROPRIATIONS AND CHARGES—Proposition 218.”
Prior to Fiscal Year 2013, the District’s fiscal years began on January 1 and ended on December 31 of each year. On September 4, 2012, the District modified its fiscal year to begin on April 1 and end on March 31 of each year. All references herein to Fiscal Year 2013 under the captions “THE DISTRICT,” “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM,” “FINANCIAL RESULTS OF THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM AND ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION” refer to the 15 month period ended March 31, 2013. All reference therein to Fiscal Years subsequent to Fiscal Year 2013 refers to the twelve month periods ending March 31 of the applicable year.
Employees and Employee Benefits
General. The District current roster shows employment of approximately 167 fulltime employees, of whom 26 work in Irrigation Operations, 41 work in Facilities/Fleet Maintenance, 15 work in Energy Resources, 7 work in Hydroelectric Project, 19 work in Parks and Recreation, 21 work in Finance and Customer Service, 12 work in Administration, and 26 work in Engineering and Planning.
The Field Operations employees are represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1245 (“IBEW”). No other District employees are represented by a labor union. The District has not experienced any strike or other labor actions. The District’s current contract with the IBEW expires March 31, 2021.
Pension. The District contributes to the California Public Employees Retirement System (“CalPERS”), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for its participating member employers. CalPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non-duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: the Basic Death Benefit, the 1957 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law.
On September 12, 2012, the Governor of the State signed Assembly Bill 340 (“AB 340”), which implements pension reform in the State. Effective January 1, 2013, AB 340 provides in part as follows: (i) requires public retirement systems and their participating employers to share equally with employees by January 1, 2018 the normal cost rate (as described below) for such retirement systems; (ii) prohibits employers from paying employer-paid member contributions to such retirement systems for employees hired after January 1, 2013; (iii) establishes a compulsory maximum non safety benefit formula of 2.5% at age 67; and (iv) defines final compensation as the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned during a 36 month period. The Board adopted a resolution creating a separate tier of CalPERS pension benefits for
A-4 employees hired after January 1, 2013 to comply with AB 340’s compulsory reduced formula. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by State statute and the Board.
The Pension Plan’s provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2017, are summarized as follows:
Hired Prior to Hired on or After Hire Date January 1, 2013 January 1, 2013 Benefit formula 2.0% @ 60 2% @ 62 Benefit vesting schedule 5 years’ service 5 years’ service Benefit payments Monthly for life Monthly for life Minimum Retirement age 50 52 Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible compensation(1) 2.0% 2.0% Required employee contribution rates 7.0% 7.0% Required employer contribution rates(2) 15.837% 15.837%
Employees Covered. At March 31, 2017, the following number of employees were covered by the benefit terms of the Pension Plan:
Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 192 Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 21 Active employees 162
Contributions. Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by an actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS’ annual actuarial valuation process. The rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the determined rate and the contribution rate of the employees. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended.
The table below provides a recent history of the required employer contributions for the Pension Plan, as determined by the annual actuarial valuation, as well as the required employer contributions for Fiscal Year 2018. The information below does not account for prepayments or benefit changes made during a fiscal year.
Fiscal Year Employer Normal Cost Unfunded Rate Total 2012-13 5.744% 6.667% 12.411% 2013-14 6.250 6.926 13.176 2014-15 6.692 7.959 14.651 2015-16 6.647 9.190 15.837 2016-17 7.029 9.972 17.001 2017-18(1) 6.897 N/A N/A
(1) Beginning with Fiscal Year 2018, CalPERS will collect employer contributions toward the unfunded accrued liability as dollar amounts instead of a contribution rate. The District’s estimated employer contribution for its unfunded liability in Fiscal Year 2017-18 is estimated to be $1,406,203.
Net Pension Liability. The District’s net pension liability for the Pension Plan is measured as the total pension liability, less the pension plan’s fiduciary net position. The available net pension liability of the Pension Plan was most recently measured as of June 30, 2015, using an annual actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2014 rolled forward to June 30, 2015 using standard update procedures. A summary of principal assumptions and methods used to determine the net pension liability is shown below.
A-5 Valuation date June 30, 2015 Measurement date June 30, 2016 Actuarial cost method Entry-age normal cost method Discount rate 7.65%(1) Inflation 2.75% Payroll Growth 3.00% Projected Salary Increase Varies by entry age and service Investment rate of return(2) 7.65% Mortality rate table(3) Derived using CalPERS’ membership data for all funds
(1) The discount rate, net of pension plan investment expenses (including inflation), is 7.5%. (2) Net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation. In December 2016, CalPERS’ board voted to reduce the assumed investment rate of return to 7% by 2020. See the caption “— Discount Rate” below. (3) The mortality rate table was developed based on CalPERS’ specific data. The table includes 20 years of mortality improvements using Society of Actuarial Scale BB.
Discount Rate
General. CalPERS reviews all actuarial assumptions as part of its regular Asset Liability Management (ALM) review cycle. In December 2016, CalPERS’ board approved reductions in the assumed investment rate of return (also referred to as the discount rate) in accordance with the following schedule: 7.375% in fiscal year 2017-18, 7.25% in fiscal year 2018-19 and 7.00% in fiscal year 2019-20. Such reductions in the discount rate are expected to increase the District’s required employer contributions as well as the District’s unfunded accrued pension liability. See the caption “— Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate” for the estimated effect of changes in the discount rate to the District’s net pension liability. The District does not expect such reductions in CalPERS’ assumed discount rate and increases in its required payments to CalPERS’ which may result therefrom to have a material adverse impact on its ability to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments. CalPERS may adjust the discount rate in the future, which adjustments will require action by CalPERS’ board and proper stakeholder outreach.
On November 18, 2015, the CalPERS Board adopted a Funding Risk Mitigation Policy (the “Mitigation Policy”) that seeks to reduce funding risk over time. The Mitigation Policy establishes a mechanism whereby CalPERS investment performance that significantly outperforms the discount rate triggers adjustments to the discount rate, expected investment return, and strategic asset allocation targets. Reducing the volatility of investment returns is expected to increase the long-term sustainability of CalPERS pension benefits for members. In February 2017, the CalPERS Board revised the Mitigation Policy. The revisions include suspension of the policy until fiscal year 2020-21, and a decrease of the required first excess investment return threshold from 4 to 2 percent.
Changes in the Net Pension Liability. The following table shows the changes in net pension liability recognized over the measurement period.
A-6 Increase (Decrease) Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension Liability Liability (a) Net Position (b) (c) = (a) – (b) Balance at June 30, 2015(1) $ 69,277,387 $ 49,733,463 $ 19,543,924 Changes Recognized for the Measurement Period: Service Cost 1,445,525 -- 1,445,525 Interest on Total Pension Liability 5,238,549 -- 5,238,549 Changes of Benefit Terms 183,194 -- 183,194 Changes in Assumptions ------Differences between Expected and Actual Experience 159,334 -- 159,334 Contribution from Employer -- 1,699,603 (1,699,603) Contribution from Employees -- 751,609 (751,609) Net Investment Income -- 244,953 (244,953) Benefit Payments, including Refunds of Employee Contribution (3,729,791) (3,729,791) -- Administrative Expense -- (30,310) 30,310 Net Changes During 2015-16 3,296,811 (1,063,936) 4,630,747 Balance at June 30, 2016(1) $ 72,574,198 $ 48,669,527 $ 23,904,671
(1) The fiduciary net position includes receivables for employee service buybacks, deficiency reserves, fiduciary self-insurance and OPEB expense.
Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate. The following presents the net pension liability of the District, calculated using the current discount rate, as well as what the District’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage point lower or 1-percentage point higher than the current rate:
Current Discount Rate Current Discount Rate Current Discount Rate + – 1% 6.65% 7.65% 1% 8.65% Plan Net Pension Liability/(Assets) $33,889,036 $23,904,671 $15,719,336
Funding History. The Pension Plan’s market value and funding progress over the most recently available five years is set forth below at the actuarial valuation date of June 30. As further discussed below, the District’s Pension Plan is included within a pooled pension plan.
Annual Valuation Entry Age Accrued Market Value of Unfunded Accrued Covered Date Liability Assets(1) Liability Funded Ratio Payroll 6/30/2011 $56,533,121 $40,619,193 $15,913,928 71.90% $10,284,848 6/30/2012 58,262,912 39,666,695 18,596,217 68.10 9,869,599 6/30/2013 61,284,108 43,535,691 17,748,417 71.00 9,922,950 6/30/2014 67,609,001 49,811,025 17,797,976 73.07 10,555,622 6/30/2015 70,935,830 49,665,726 21,270,104 70.00 10,504,655 ______(1) As a result of recent pension reform adopted by CalPERS on April 17, 2013 and made effective as of June 30, 2013, CalPERS no longer uses an actuarial value of assets and instead uses a market value of assets. While this results in a change to the funded ratio, this does not reflect any change in payments made.
Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflow/Inflow of Resources. The District has deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resrouces related to pensions, as listed below. Included in the list below are subsequent contributions that were made between the measurement date of June 30, 2016 and the District’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.
A-7 Deferred Outflow of Deferred Inflow of Resources Resources Change of assumptions $ -- $ (578,173) Differences between actual and expected experience 396,047 -- Pension contribution subsequent to measurement date 1,963,127 -- Net differences between projected and actual earnings on plan investments 3,465,140 (1,074,680) Total $ 5,824,314 $(1,652,853)
The District has deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to its Pension Plan as listed below.
Measurement Period Deferred Outflows/(Inflows) (June 30 of Resources 2017 $ 69,955 2018 279,819 2019 1,139,563 2020 718,997 Total $ 2,208,334
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position. Detailed information about the District’s pension plan fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports.
Further information with respect to the Pension Plan is set forth in Note 9 and the Supplementary Information to the District’s audited financial statements for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017, attached to the Official Statement as Appendix A-1.
Other Post-Employment Employee Benefits. The District administers a single employer defined benefit other post-employment healthcare (“OPEB”) plan to provide healthcare coverage to eligible retired employees and their eligible dependents. The District maintains the same medical plans for its retirees as for its active employees. Benefits are paid until the retiree, spouse or surviving spouse becomes eligible for Medicare. Employees become eligible to retire and receive healthcare benefits upon reaching age 60 with five years of service to the District.
With respect to its OPEB plan, since March 1, 2014, the District has been participating in the CalPERS California Employer’s Retiree Benefit Trust Program (“CERBT”), a prefunding plan trust fund. Employers who participate in CERBT own units of the fund’s portfolio which is invested in accordance with the approved strategic asset allocation; they do not have direct ownership of the securities in the portfolio. The CERBT is a self-funded program, in which the participating employers pay the program costs.
The following table provides a summary of the District’s fair value of assets on deposit with CERBT for Fiscal Year 2017:
Fiscal Year 2017 Fair Value – beginning of year $ 584,686 Contributions 71,085 Gain (loss) on investments 61,479 Administrative Expenses (436) Fair Value – end of year $ 716,814
A-8 The Governmental Accounting Standards Board’s Statement No. 45 (“GASB 45”) requires governmental agencies that fund post-employment benefits on a pay-as-you go basis, such as the District, to account for and report the outstanding obligations and commitments related to such post-employment benefits in essentially the same manner as for pensions. For the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017, the District contributed $158,070 to the plan, which represents 47% of the cost for such Fiscal Year. While requiring the District to disclose the unfunded actuarial accrued liability and the ARC in its financial statements, GASB 45 does not require the District to amortize the ARC.
The following table shows the components of the District’s annual OPEB cost for Fiscal Year 2017, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and changes in the District’s net OPEB obligation to the plan.
Fiscal Year 2017 Annual required contribution $ 350,055 Interest on net OPEB obligation 102,111 Adjustment to annual required contribution (117,554) Annual OPEB cost (expense) $ 334,612 Funded Contribution (71,085) Contributions made (158,070) Increase (decrease) in Net OPEB obligations $ 105,457 Net OPEB obligation, beginning of year $ 1,458,735 Net OPEB obligation, end of year $ 1,564,192
The following table shows the annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the fiscal years noted.
Percentage of Annual Fiscal Year Ended Annual OPEB Cost OPEB Cost Contributed Net OPEB Obligation 03/31/2015 $397,145 152.76% $1,516,407 03/31/2016 334,001 117.27 1,458,735 03/31/2017 334,612 68.48 1,564,192
As of July 1, 2015, the latest valuation date, the actuarial accrued liability for the OPEB plan was $4,879,243. In the July 1, 2015 valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial method was used. The assumptions included a 7% investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses), which is based on the District’s own investments, and a constant 3% general inflation rate increase. The annual healthcare cost trend rates are as follows: for medical premiums, 7% initially, reduced by 1% decrements to an ultimate rate of 5% after four years and 4% every year for dental and vision premiums. The unfunded accrued actuarial liability is being amortized as a level dollar on an open basis. The remaining amortization period at July 1, 2015 was 30 years.
For Fiscal Year 2018, the District has budgeted $265,820 with respect to post-employment benefits, which is equal to the expected amount of the ARC for Fiscal Year 2017. The District currently does not expect that any increased funding of post-employment benefits in the future will have a material adverse effect on the ability of the District to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Further information with respect to the District’s post-employment benefits funding status is set forth in Note 10 and the Supplementary Information to the District’s audited financial statements for Fiscal Year 2017 attached to the Official Statement as Appendix A-1.
Risk Management
The District participates in the Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance Authority (the “JPIA”), an intergovernmental risk sharing joint powers authority created to provide
A-9 self-insurance programs for California water agencies. The JPIA arranges and administers programs of insurance for the pooling of self-insured losses, and purchases excess insurance coverage for its members. The JPIA began operations on October 1, 1979 and has continued without interruption since that time.
As of March 31, 2017, the Agency limits and deductibles for liability, property, and workers compensation programs of the JPIA are as follows:
General and auto liability, public officials and employees’ errors and omissions: The JPIA total pooled self-insurance limits is $5,000,000, per occurrence. The JPIA purchased additional excess coverage layers of $58,000,000 for general, auto and public officials liability, which increases the limits on the insurance coverage noted above.
Property losses are paid at the replacement cost for buildings, fixed equipment and personal property on file, if replaced within two years after the loss, otherwise such losses are paid on an actual cash value basis, subject to a $10,000 deductible per loss, actual cash value for mobile equipment, subject to a $5,000 deductible per loss, and licensed vehicles, subject to a $5,000 deductible per loss. Accidental machinery breakdown coverage is provided and is subject to variable deductibles. The JPIA purchased excess coverage for a combined total of $150,000,000 per occurrence.
Dam failure liability of up to $5,000,000. The deductible per loss is $250,000.
Workers compensation insurance up to State statutory limits for all work related injuries/illnesses covered by State law. The JPIA has a pooled layer of up to $2,000,000 and excess coverage has been purchased.
Settled claims have not exceeded commercial insurance coverage in any of the past three Fiscal Years.
Other Outstanding Obligations
Outstanding Electric System Bonds. In 2012, the District issued its 2012 Electric System Revenue Bonds (the “2012 Electric System Bonds”) to Rabobank, N.A. to secure the District’s obligations under a Payment Agreement, dated July 1, 2012 (which Payment Agreement was amended and restated by an Amended and Restated Payment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2015 by and between the District and Rabobank, N.A.). The 2012 Electric System Bonds are payable from Net Electric System Revenues on a parity with the Series 2017A Installment Payments. As of March 31, 2017, the 2012 Electric System Bonds were outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $10,170,000. The District expects to prepay, from District reserves, the 2012 Electric System Bonds on or before the date of delivery of the 2017A Bonds. The table under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION— Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” reflects such prepayment of the 2012 Electric System Bonds.
In June 2015, the District issued its Electric System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A in the aggregate principal amount of $59,010,000 (the “2015A Electric System Bonds” and together with the 2012 Electric System Bonds, the “Outstanding Electric System Bonds”), which are currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $55,170,000. The 2015A Electric System Bonds are secured by an Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between the District and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The 2015A Electric System Bonds are payable from Net Electric System Revenues on a parity with the Series 2017A Installment Payments. A portion of the proceeds of the 2015A Electric System Bonds were used to refund the District’s outstanding 2005 Electric System Refunding Revenue Bonds (the “2005 Bonds”), 2005 Revenue Certificates of Participation (2005 Electric System Project) (“2005 Certificates”) (which 2005 Certificates were secured by payments made under an Installment Purchase
A-10 Contract, dated as of October 1, 2005 (the “2005 Installment Purchase Contract”)) and Electric System 2013 Revenue Refunding Bonds (the “2013 Bonds”).
The District may incur additional obligations payable from Net Electric System Revenues on a parity with the Series 2017A Installment Payments and the Outstanding Electric System Bonds, subject to the terms and conditions described in the Official Statement under the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS— Limitations on District Parity and Superior Obligations; Subordinate Obligations” and in this Appendix A under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Future Electric System Improvements.” The District may incur obligations payable from Net Electric System Revenues subordinate to the Series 2017A Installment Payments and the Outstanding Electric System Bonds without compliance with such terms and conditions.
Water System and Hydroelectric System Obligations. In 2014, the District issued its $31,410,000 aggregate principal amount of Water and Hydroelectric Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A and the Water and Hydroelectric Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B (Taxable) (collectively, the “Water and Hydroelectric System Obligations”). The Water and Hydroelectric System Obligations are payable solely from revenues of the District’s Water System and Hydroelectric System which generally include all revenues derived from charges for the delivery of water service and the from the sale of hydroelectric power generation. Revenues of the District’s Water System and Hydroelectric System are not pledged to and are not available to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Bank Credit Facility. The District entered into an unsecured line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association in a not-to-exceed amount of $25,000,000 to finance the District’s operating and capital expenditures (the “Line of Credit”). Principal of and interest on the Line of Credit is an unsecured obligation of the District payable from all legally available funds and revenues of the District, including Net Electric System Revenues available after payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and the Outstanding Electric System Bonds.
While the Line of Credit is an unsecured obligation of the District, under certain circumstances, including, but not limited to the downgrade of certain obligations of the Water System, the Hydroelectric System or the Electric System by one or more rating agencies or the scheduled termination of the Line of Credit, amounts due under the Line of Credit may become immediately due and payable.
As of March 31, 2017, the District had approximately $4,310,000 outstanding under the Line of Credit, none of which was applied to operating or capital expenses of the Electric System. The Line of Credit is currently scheduled to terminate on August 17, 2017. The District Board of Directors approved a three-year extension of the Line of Credit on July 18, 2017. The District expects the extension of the Line of Credit to occur on August 14, 2017. The District can make no assurances that the Line of Credit will be extended.
Water System and Hydroelectric System
Water System. The District owns and operates its Water System which consists of approximately 720 miles of water conveyance facilities, which include lined or piped and portions of natural streams, creeks, sloughs or drains that convey irrigation water during the irrigation season and storm flows during the off- season. The District’s Water System also includes 215 groundwater wells. The Merced River is the main source of the District’s surface water supply from which direct flows and stored water impounded in Lake McClure by the New Exchequer Dam are diverted by the District. The District holds pre-1914 water rights on the Merced River, local reservoirs and creeks and appropriative water rights on the Merced River issued by the State Water Resources Control Board for the direct diversion and storage of Merced River water. The District also owns small reservoirs controlled by a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition network that are used for regulating flows and balancing the supplies and demands of the District’s Water System. The District uses its facilities to deliver water to customers within its service area. Revenues of the District’s Water System are not available to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments and operations and maintenance costs of the Water System do not constitute Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
A-11 Hydroelectric System. The District owns and operates its Hydroelectric System which currently consists of the New Exchequer Dam, which impounds the New Exchequer Reservoir (Lake McClure) and McSwain Dam, which impounds the McSwain Reservoir (Lake McSwain) and related hydroelectric facilities. Both dams, reservoirs and related hydroelectric facilities were completed in 1967 and comprise the Merced River Hydroelectric Project. The District is currently operating the Merced River Hydroelectric Project under a one year license from FERC, pending the issuance of a long term license. While the current FERC schedule suggests a long term license could be issued in 2015, the District cannot predict the actual date which a long term license may be received. Until the long term license is issued, the District expects to continue receiving annual licenses permitting the continued operations of the Hydroelectric System. Revenues of the District’s Hydroelectric System are not available to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments and operations and maintenance costs of the Hydroelectric System do not constitute Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
Drainage District
In 1994, the District formed the Merced Irrigation District, Drainage Improvement District #1 and began using portions of its irrigation distribution system for urban storm drainage. As of March 31, 2017, the District provided drainage service to approximately 15,205 parcels in certain cities and communities in the County. Drainage fees are assessed annually by the District and are collected through the County tax rolls. Drainage fees collected do not constitute Electric System Revenues pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and operations and maintenance costs of the Drainage District do not constitute Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
Parks and Recreation
The District owns, operates and maintains five recreation areas adjacent to Lake McClure and Lake McSwain which consist of the Lake McSwain Recreation Area, located adjacent to Lake McSwain; McClure Point, Barrett Cove, Horseshoe Bend and Bagby Recreation Areas, all located adjacent to Lake McClure (collectively, the “Parks and Recreation Facilities”).
Fees and charges collected by the District relating to the Parks and Recreation Facilities do not constitute Electric System Revenues pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments, and operations and maintenance costs of the Parks and Recreation Facilities do not constitute Operations and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM
General
The District has the right to “provide for the acquisition, operation, leasing, and control of plants for the generation, transmission, distribution, sale and lease of electric power, including sale to municipalities, public utility districts, or persons” (California Water Code, Section 22115).
PG&E, an investor owned utility, historically was the sole provider of electric service in the District. In 1996, the District signed an interconnection agreement with Turlock Irrigation District (“TID”) to purchase power wholesale, which the District then sells to its customers on a retail basis. The District constructed the Merced-Turlock 115 kV Intertie (the “Intertie”) to provide an interconnection to TID’s system. On May 11, 1996, the District completed the Intertie along with the Pioneer Substation in Livingston and began delivering 10 megawatts (“MW”) of power to a customers within the District.
In April 1999, the District completed construction of a transmission loop line linking the cities of Livingston, Atwater, and Merced, as well as the Castle Airport. The Castle Airport is located adjacent to Atwater and is the site of the former Castle Air Force Base. The District has also built distribution main feeder
A-12 systems and substations (the Castle Airport has an existing distribution system owned and operated by the District). The District is the sole electric service provider for the Castle Airport. The District has constructed approximately 452 miles of distribution lines within its service area, approximately 85% of which are underground. The District has also constructed approximately 35 miles of 115kV overhead transmission lines.
The District serves commercial, industrial, agricultural and residential customers located in the cities and surrounding areas of Merced, Livingston, and Atwater. The District has based its five-year projections for the operations and finances of the Electric System upon current customers, customers under contract and customers deemed probable based upon recent marketing experience. See “—The District’s Customer Base” below.
The District currently provides retail electric service to approximately 9,000 customers within the electric service area of the District. Current customer information for the number of customers served by PG&E in the District electric service area is unavailable. Information published by the County in 2013 suggests that as of 2006 PG&E served approximately 68,300 residential and approximately 8,154 commercial and industrial customers within the County as a whole. The District believes most of these PG&E customers are located outside of the District electric service area and some of these customers are located outside of the boundaries of the District. The District reports that since the creation of the District Electric System, approximately 777 commercial and industrial customers have switched from PG&E to the District Electric System. During that same period the District reports that only one commercial and industrial customer has switched from the District Electric System to PG&E.
The District currently has constructed Electric System facilities within new residential developments to serve approximately 3,000 units of new residential housing. Because of the recession in the last decade as well as the slow economic recovery, growth in residential development within the District has been slower than originally anticipated. The actual rate of growth in residential customers will depend in part on the pace of economic growth within the County, new home construction activity and the sale of such new homes to residents once constructed.
The District has generated electricity through its Exchequer hydroelectric facilities since 1927 and through its McSwain hydroelectric facilities since 1967. The revenues from the District’s Hydroelectric System and Water System are not available to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Description of the Electric System
Major Electric System facilities are described below.
Transmission Line Loop. In April 1999, the District completed an approximately 35 mile 115 kilovolt (“kV”) transmission line loop that connects Pioneer Substation in Livingston to Castle Airport in Atwater, then to Merced. This transmission line provides back-up capability to all District customers, thus reducing the risk of a prolonged outage.
Substations. Connected to the transmission loop are three substations which step down voltage from 115 kV to 12 and 21 kV for local distribution. In the future, additional transmission, distribution and substation facilities may be built in the Merced area to accommodate future system growth.
Distribution Lines. The District has approximately 452 miles of distribution lines to deliver power to its customers. Most of the District’s distribution facilities and essentially all of the District’s distribution facilities within the cities of Livingston, Atwater and Merced are located underground. Underground construction results in increased capital requirements but will provide lower system maintenance costs, and improved reliability over the long term.
A-13 Power Supply
Sources of Supply. While the District owns certain hydroelectric facilities described under the caption “THE DISTRICT—Water System and Hydroelectric System,” electricity generated from such hydroelectric facilities are not supplied to customers of the Electric System. The electricity supplied to customers of the Electric System is obtained from the following power supply contracts:
(1) an all-requirements power contract with Turlock Irrigation District;
(2) a contract with the Western Area Power Administration (“WAPA”); and
(3) a contract for Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) only, with Avangrid Renewables, Inc. (formerly Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.) (“Avangrid”).
Because of the contract with TID, the District has not historically engaged in open market purchases.
Use of Supply. For the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017, the total number of meters in the Electric System was approximately 9,000. For the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017, the overall average net cost of purchased power was approximately $0.05544 cents per kilowatt-hour (“kWh”) inclusive of transmission costs.
The various power supply resources available to the Electric System during the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017 are described below. During the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017, the District purchased a total of 498,123 megawatt hours (“MWh”) of electricity for delivery to customers of the Electric System. The following table sets forth the amounts in MWh and percentages of electricity obtained by the District for customers of the Electric System during the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017.
ANNUAL ELECTRICITY SUPPLY(1) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017
Resource Cost/kWh(2) MWh Percentage TID $0.05 487,138 98% WAPA 0.03 10,985 2 Total 100%
(1) Excludes energy purchased from Avangrid, which is immediately resold to Avangrid, and is therefore not a source of supply for the Electric System. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Power Purchase Contracts— Avangrid Purchase Agreement.” (2) Includes transmission costs. Source: District
The peak demand for the Electric System for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 was 95.6 MW. The historic Electric System peak demand of 97.6 MW was set on August 19, 2013. The following table sets forth the total purchases of power (MWh) and the peak demand (MW) during the last five Fiscal Years for District customers.
A-14 TOTAL ENERGY PURCHASED AND PEAK DEMAND(1)
2013(2) 2014 2015 2016 2017 TID (MWh) 557,184 464,816 484,469 484,581 487,138 WAPA (MWh) 12,843 10,985 10,985 10,985 10,985
System Native Load (MWh) 539,074 449,965 468,552 468,497 471,978 System Peak Demand (MW) 96.0 97.6 101.5 99.2 95.6
(1) Excludes energy purchased from Avangrid, which is immediately resold to Avangrid, and is therefore not a source of supply for the Electric System. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Power Purchase Contracts— Avangrid Purchase Agreement.”’ (2) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
Power Purchase Contracts
Purchases Made Under Contract with TID. While the District has had various agreements with TID since 1996, the District entered into its current all-requirements contract (with the exception of the power supplied by WAPA) with TID in May 2017. The term of this contract is through April 30, 2028 (the “TID Purchase Contract”).
The District’s purchases of power from TID under the TID Purchase Contract for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017 totaled $23,792,949.
Purchases Made Under Contract With Western Area Power Administration. The District and WAPA have entered into an agreement (the “WAPA Purchase Contract”) that makes available to the District 0.52138% of WAPA’s base resource, which is power available after project requirements. As part of the U.S. Department of Energy, WAPA markets wholesale electrical power from hydroelectric facilities associated with the Central Valley Project and the Washoe Project. Transmission for the WAPA Purchase Contract is provided to the District by TID. The WAPA Purchase Contract will expire on December 31, 2024, unless extended. Under the terms of the existing WAPA Purchase Contract, the District received 21,252 MWh of electricity during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017. The District’s composite cost of power under the WAPA Purchase Contract was $27.35 per MWh during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.
Renewable Resource Plan. California's Renewable Portfolio Standard (“RPS”) was established in Senate Bill (“SB”) 1078, enacted in 2002. The RPS was accelerated in 2006 by SB 107. In 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-14-08 requiring that all retail sellers of electricity serve 33% of their load with renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09, signed in 2009, directed the California Air Resources Board to enact regulations to achieve this goal by 2020. Under these laws and orders, publicly owned utilities (“POUs”) like the District are required to adopt an RPS that is consistent with policies encouraging procurement of renewable resources.
In April 2011, Governor Brown signed SBX1-2 that codified the requirement to serve 33% of retail sales using renewable energy resources by 2020. SBX1-2 became effective on December 10, 2011. Under SBX1-2, POUs are no longer able to set their own RPS goals, but instead are required to meet the same RPS targets that are required of the State’s Investor Owed Utilities (“IOUs”). The District intends to comply with legislative intent of SBX1-2 and has implemented an environmental charge (“EC”). The EC will allow the District to recover the regulatory costs it incurs relating to compliance with the applicable RPS.
In April 2015, Governor Brown signed Executive Order B-30-15, which establishes a new interim statewide greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission reduction target to reduce GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. In September 2016, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill No. 32, which among other things, adopts a 40% targeted reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2030. The District’s current
A-15 generating units are all hydroelectric generators with no carbon emissions. The District’s GHG reporting is limited to sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas reporting from circuit breakers at the powerhouses as well as in the electric distribution system.
The following renewable resources have been contracted for or are being considered by the District as potential alternatives for sources of renewable energy to meet program objectives. Together, these renewable resources will meet approximately 27% of the District’s retail sales by December 31, 2017. This compares favorably with the 27% requirement in SBX1-2.
Avangrid Purchase Agreement. In 2003, the District and Avangrid (formerly Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.) entered into a 25-year power purchase agreement (the “Avangrid Purchase Agreement”) for up to five MW of wind energy generated from a project to be constructed near Solano County, California. The agreement expires in October 2028. The Avangrid Purchase Agreement is a non-firm power supply contract to purchase five MW of installed capacity, which was expected to generate 16,000 MWh of energy annually for the District at a fixed price of $54.95 per MWh. As amended in April 1, 2010, under the Avangrid Purchase Agreement the District receives a credit on their invoice for the amount of energy delivered to the California Independent System Operator (“CAISO”) times the locational marginal price applicable to the CAISO pricing node for the wind project. The District’s purchases during the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017 totaled $$543,615. The District’s sales back to Avangrid during the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017 totaled $285,646.
Small Unit Hydroelectric (less than 30 MW): The District owns five small hydroelectric units with total generation of 13.6 MW. In accordance with contracts with TID which end in 2031 and 2032, three of these units are financed, operated, and maintained by TID. Output of the units goes to TID and the expenses and benefits of their operation are equally shared by TID and the District. The units are part of the District’s Water System and the energy generated is not available for customers of the District’s Electric System. The fourth unit, at Lake McSwain, is a 9 MW unit 2 miles downstream from New Exchequer. In 2017, the District purchased its fifth small hydroelectric unit, the Merced Falls Hydroelectric Project, from PG&E, which has a capacity of 3.5MW.
Large Unit Hydroelectric (greater than 30 MW): The District’s New Exchequer hydroelectric facility has a capacity of 94.5 MW. Energy generated by the Hydroelectric System is not available for customers of the District’s Electric System.
Energy Efficiency Programs. Since 2000, the District has implemented a wide array of energy efficiency and demand reduction programs for its customers funded through the State’s Public Benefits Charge (“PBC”). The District offers customized and prescriptive commercial and residential rebate programs. The commercial energy efficiency rebate programs range from energy efficient lighting and air conditioning rebates, to cool roofs, motor replacement rebates and incentives for building retrofit projects. The rebate incentives offered by the District help reduce electricity use at peak and reduce overall utility load. Over the last three years, these combined residential and commercial programs have resulted in over 3.8 million kWh savings for customers, representing the reduced load requirement to be served by the Electric System.
Open Market Purchases
Due to the District’s TID Purchase Contract, the District has not historically purchased energy from the open market. Upon completion of the Project, the District may become more active in the open market. See, however, “—Future Power Purchase Agreements.”
A-16 Future Power Purchase Agreements
The District is exploring entering into additional power purchase contracts with other providers, including CAISO and TID. The projections under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” do not reflect an additional power purchase agreement with TID. If the District enters into an additional power purchase agreement with TID, the projected costs relating to the purchase of power under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” can be expected to increase. See the captions “—Transmission and Scheduling” and “—Future Electric System Improvements.”
Wholesale Power Trading Policies and Risk Management
Due to significant changes occurring within California’s electric power industry, management of power resources on a day-to-day basis has become critical to the financial stability of an electric utility. In response to these changes, the District adopted a formal policy for the administration of energy risk management activities within the Electric System. This policy defines the limits for power trading activities to mitigate and reduce risks associated with this business activity. The District also appointed an Energy Risk Manager to oversee the development, implementation, and ongoing monitoring of a formalized financial risk management program for power supply activities. The policy is reviewed on an annual basis, and recommended changes have been periodically adopted by the District Board.
Recently, the policy was updated to incorporate changes in regulatory and legislative requirements, including an amendment to authorized transactions, organizational structure and reporting requirements. The comprehensive updated policy was approved by the Board in 2014.
Swap Agreements
The District has entered into swap agreements that are designed to reduce the District’s variable price energy purchase exposure. Generally under the swap agreements, the District will pay a fixed price to the swap counterparty in exchange for a variable price from the counterparty based on the NP-15 Price Index. For fiscal year 2018, based on current load forecasts, the District expects to hedge a minimum of 60% of its market price exposure.
The District has entered swap agreements with a variety of counterparties. Currently the District has outstanding swap agreements with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”), Cargill Incorporated (“Cargill”), British Petroleum (“BP”), and Avangrid Renewables. The District may enter into swap agreements with additional counterparties in the future.
The Morgan Stanley, Cargill, BP and Avangrid swap agreements (the “Swap Agreements”) provide that all payments by the District under the Swap Agreements are payable from retail electric system revenues, which the District treats as Electric System Revenues. The District treats payments under the Swap Agreements as Operation and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System.
Transmission and Scheduling
TID provides wheeling, interconnection, and ancillary services to the District under a 20-year Interconnection and Transmission Service Agreement (ITSA), which went into effect on May 1, 2017. This agreement is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2038. The District is exploring an interconnection agreement with CAISO, however, the District can make no assurances as to whether such an agreement will be entered into with CAISO.
A-17 Operations and Maintenance
To begin electric operations in 1996, the District contracted with TID for operating services. Since contract initiation, the District has added field crews and enhanced its own support services to reduce its utilization of TID. The District now provides its own support services, with the exception of control center operations as provided for in the TID Purchase Contract.
The District’s Customer Base
The District currently serves approximately 9,000 customers in the communities of Livingston, Atwater, Merced and surrounding areas with a combined peak load of about 100 MW. Since starting operations, the District has diversified its rate base to include additional food processing facilities, medical care facilities, fast food restaurants, supermarkets, service stations, educational facilities, county and city administration facilities (including courthouse, county jail and city police station), ground water wells, retirement homes, product distribution facilities, commercial printing, auto sales, and commercial and residential subdivisions.
While approximately 83% of the District’s load base is currently comprised of larger commercial and industrial accounts, the load base has evolved into a diversified system including residential subdivisions and smaller commercial customers.
The District is not the sole provider of retail electric service within the District service area. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—General” and “ELECTRIC SYSTEM STRATEGIC PLAN AND OUTLOOK.”
Customers and Electric Sales
The following tables set forth the number of metered customers, total energy sold and revenues from sale of energy during the periods shown.
NUMBER OF METERED CUSTOMERS
Fiscal Year 2013(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Residential 6,557 6,647 6,683 6,861 7,133 Commercial 1,115 1,153 1,174 1,194 1,236 Industrial 8 8 8 8 8 Agriculture 55 60 65 77 81 Municipal 95 96 102 105 108 Public Lighting 98 96 98 98 100 Total - all classes 7,928 8,060 8,130 8,343 8,666
(1) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
A-18 ENERGY SOLD (MWh)
Fiscal Year 2013(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Residential 65,981 55,031 56,091 55,217 56,791 Commercial 199,495 170,952 170,769 170,606 175,166 Industrial 210,699 169,564 176,918 172,066 178,346 Agriculture 3,254 3,640 3,763 3,847 3,265 Municipal 63,381 57,795 58,167 57,884 58,702 Public Lighting 2,065 1,332 1,259 1,263 1,265 Total MWh Sold 544,875 458,314 466,965 460,883 473,536
(1) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
Customer Concentration
The Electric System’s two largest customers provided approximately 23% of Electric System Revenues for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017. No other customer of the Electric System provided more than 5% of Electric System Revenues for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017. The top ten customers of the Electric System provided approximately 43% of Electric System Revenue for the Fiscal Year ended March 31, 2017.
Billings and Collections
Residential and commercial customers are billed monthly. Bills are generally due on the 5th day of each month. Although the utility is not subject to the general jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) or other agencies, collection activities for the District substantially conform to the requirements of the California Public Utilities Code Section 10010. After a bill is delinquent, a system generated Delinquent Notice is mailed allowing approximately seven additional days to pay. If no payment is received by the Delinquent Notice due date, a Final Disconnect Notice is mailed allowing an additional seven days to pay. If payment is not received by the Final Disconnect Notice due date, the District may disconnect electric service and charge a disconnection processing fee and a disconnection fee in accordance with the then current fee schedule. Before service is reinstated, the customer must pay the delinquent amount, disconnection processing fee, disconnection fee and a reconnection fee in accordance with the then current fee schedule, and may be required to pay a customer deposit.
A-19 Uncollectible Accounts
Over the past five Fiscal Years, an average of approximately $58,924 of the District’s total billings were uncollectible, reflecting an average annual write-off rate of approximately 0.11%. The following table shows the historical results of the Electric System’s accounts receivable and collection efforts:
HISTORY OF BILLINGS AND COLLECTIONS (Dollars in Thousands)
Write-Off as Delinquent Fiscal % of Net Receivable Year Billings Payments Billing Write-Off Balance 2017 $51,078,684 $52,785,500 0.08% $38,554 $ 33,548 2016 54,532,050 54,984,787 0.17 93,714 141,229 2015 54,690,990 55,969,360 0.03 14,767 47,637 2014 52,710,060 52,163,013 0.05 27,118 91,634 2013(1) 60,057,245 60,263,957 0.20 120,468 18,644
(1) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
Electric System Rates and Charges
The District is obligated under the Installment Purchase Agreement to establish rates and collect charges in an amount sufficient to meet Operations and Maintenance Expenses of the Electric System and Debt Service requirements, with specified requirements as to priority and coverage. Electric rates are established by the Board. Electric rates are not subject to general regulatory jurisdiction of the CPUC or by any other State agency. The State’s Public Utilities Code contains certain provisions affecting all municipal utilities such as the District, including provisions for a public benefits charge. At this time, neither the CPUC nor any regulatory authority of the State nor FERC approves the District’s retail electric rates.
Although its rates are not subject to approval by any federal agency, the District is subject to certain ratemaking provisions of the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”). PURPA requires state regulatory authorities and nonregulated electric utilities, including the District, to consider certain ratemaking standards and to make certain determinations in connection therewith. To the best of its knowledge, the District is operating in compliance with PURPA.
The District collects a surcharge for public benefit programs on customer utility bills. This surcharge was mandated by State legislation (i.e., AB 1890 and subsequent legislation) and disbursement is restricted to certain types of programs and services.
At present, the Electric System has 18 rate schedules in effect. The District provides no free electric service. The 18 rate schedules are as follows:
A-20 Rate Schedule Description AG-2 Agricultural Demand General Service ED-2 Large Demand General Service ED-1P Commercial/Industrial Large Demand General Service ED-2P Large Demand Primary Service ED-3 Medium Demand General Service ED-3V Medium Demand General Service ED-4 Small Demand General Service EGS-2 Commercial & Small Industrial General Service MD-3 Municipal & Non-Profit Medium Demand General Service MD-4 Municipal & Non-Profit Small Demand General Service RES-2 Residential General Service LSC Streetlighting – Customer Owned and Maintained LSC-1 Streetlighting – District Owned and Maintained MEF Flat Rate Service NEM Net Energy Metering PCA Power Cost Adjustment EC Environmental Charge TR-1 Large Demand Transmission Service
The Electric System’s base rates have been changed periodically since the District commenced operation of the Electric System. The District’s rate structure has evolved since inception to match the growing needs of its expanding customer base. The District has not implemented any general rate increases since 2009.
In addition to the rate schedules described above, the District has contractual arrangements with two users pursuant to which power is sold on different terms and conditions. The largest Electric System customer is one of the two users which have such contractual arrangements.
Comparison of District Rates to Surrounding Providers by Customer Class
The table below sets forth a comparison of the latest District rates per kWh (in Fiscal Year 2017) to the current charges of other energy providers in the vicinity of the District, including PG&E, which serves customers within the District’s Electric System service area. The table represents the cost for each respective provider:
Residential Commercial Industrial Merced Irrigation District $0.1571 $0.1221 $0.0781 Modesto Irrigation District 0.1810 0.1225 0.1008 Turlock Irrigation District 0.1559 0.1304 0.1197 PG&E 0.1994 0.1950 0.1565
Source: District
Marketing the District’s Electric System Services
Although the District initially concentrated on obtaining service agreements with commercial and industrial customers, the District serves power to residential developers and smaller commercial users in Merced, Atwater, Livingston, and surrounding areas where feasible.
A-21 Future Electric System Improvements
As described in the Official Statement under the caption “THE PROJECT,” the District expects to finance a portion of the South Transmission Project from a portion of the proceeds of the 2017A Bonds. The distribution component consists of approximately 15.7 miles of 21kV distribution lines to connect a new 230/21kV substation (the “Lyons Substation”) to the District’s Electric System. The transmission component of the South Transmission Project consists of the Lyons Substation and an interconnection of the Lyons Substation with PG&E/CAISO system via an existing adjacent PG&E transmission line. Such interconnection is expected to require the installation of two 230 kV poles. The District is currently exploring the possibility of being reimbursed for costs of the transmission component of the Project by CAISO through transmission access charges (TAC), however, the District can make no assurances that such reimbursements will occur.
The District projects spending approximately $91,000,000 on Electric System capital improvements and additions in the current and next four Fiscal Years, including the South Transmission Project described above. Such capital improvements include upgrades to existing substations and meters, and other capital projects to improve reliability. The District anticipates paying for the cost of such improvements and additions from a combination of proceeds of the Line of Credit, Net Electric System Revenues and existing reserves dedicated to the District’s Energy Resources Department. The District can make no assurance that such additional capital improvements will be undertaken. Other than amounts associated with the South Transmission Project, a portion of which will be financed from proceeds of the 2017A Bonds, the projections under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” do not reflect any costs associated with such potential capital improvements as such costs are expected to be capitalized rather than paid as Operation and Maintenance Costs of the Electric System. In addition, no TAC reimbursements are projected to be received, however, it is possible that the District will receive such reimbursements. See “ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION—Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” below and “THE PROJECT” in the Official Statement.
The District is reviewing the feasibility of connecting its Hydroelectric System to its Electric System, allowing the District to sell electricity generated by the Hydroelectric System directly to its current and future Electric System customers. Such review is preliminary and the District has not yet determined whether the costs of such connection will be obligations of the Electric System or the Hydroelectric System. The District also expects that certain capital improvements may be required by the terms of the new long term FERC license. Such costs are expected to be obligations of the Hydroelectric System not the Electric System. No costs for the construction of such connection or for any capital improvements required to comply with a new long term FERC license are currently reflected in the Electric System or Hydroelectric System capital improvement program.
A-22 FINANCIAL RESULTS OF THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM
Revenues
The following table sets forth such electric sales during the periods shown.
REVENUES FROM SALES OF ELECTRICITY (Dollars In Thousands With Demand Included)
Fiscal Year 2013(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Residential $ 10,314,276 $ 8,900,381 $ 9,275,503 $ 9,184,336 $ 8,925,434 Commercial 23,536,360 20,201,788 20,647,017 21,336,389 21,319,167 Industrial 16,643,053 13,593,940 14,706,334 14,463,986 13,404,211 Agriculture 350,888 524,459 486,489 546,073 498,589 Municipal 7,708,573 7,054,625 7,289,788 7,482,416 7,378,942 Public Lighting 290,126 188,151 181,365 184,461 180,281 Total $ 58,843,275 $ 50,463,344 $ 52,586,496 $ 53,197,842 $ 51,706,624
(1) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
Revenues from sales of electricity in Fiscal Year 2017 declined from Fiscal Year 2016 as a result of an increase in lower power costs from an increase in residential solar generation, resulting in an increase in credits returned to the customers through power cost adjustments.
The table below sets forth the average billing rate per kWh of the various customer classes during the last five fiscal years.
AVERAGE BILLING RATE (Cents Per kWh With Demand Included)
Fiscal Year 2013(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Residential 15.2 16.6 16.34 16.63 15.71 Commercial 12.39 12.48 12.24 12.51 12.21 Industrial 8.30 8.44 8.38 08.41 07.81 Agriculture 13.18 13.41 12.93 14.20 15.27 Municipal 12.14 12.75 12.53 12.93 12.57 Public Lighting 14.43 14.69 14.41 14.61 14.25 Average - All Classes Combined 12.60 13.06 12.80 13.21 12.97
(1) Fifteen month period ended March 31, 2013. Source: District
Operating Expenses
For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017, the total operating expenses of the Electric System were $35,354,638, excluding depreciation.
Operating expenses (excluding depreciation) have remained stable in the last five Fiscal Years. Such expenses for Fiscal Year 2014 (the first 12-month period after the District changed its Fiscal Year end date to March 31) and Fiscal Year 2017 totaled $39,426,125 and $35,354,638, respectively. Distribution operating
A-23 expenses decreased from $7,772,591 for Fiscal Year 2014 to $6,714,098 for Fiscal Year 2017, a decrease of $1,058,493 or 13.6%. Purchased power costs decreased from $28,583,744 for Fiscal Year 2014 to $25,517,470 for Fiscal Year 2017, a decrease of $3,066,274 or 10.7%.
Significant Accounting Policies
The basic financial statements of the District have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as applied to government units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. As allowed by the GASB, the District has elected to apply to its proprietary activities Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statements and Interpretations, Accounting Principles Board Opinions, and Accounting Research Bulletins of the Committee of Accounting Procedures issued after November 30, 1989, where not in conflict with GASB pronouncements.
The District’s resources are allocated to and accounted for in basic financial statements as an enterprise fund type of the proprietary fund group (i.e. the Electric System). The enterprise fund is used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to a private business enterprise, where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges, or, where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other policies. Net position represents the amount available for future operations.
The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. The enterprise fund type is accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, all assets and all liabilities associated with the operation of the District are included on the statement of net position. Net position is segregated into net investment in capital assets; restricted; and unrestricted. Enterprise fund type operating statements present increases (i.e., revenues) and decreases (i.e., expenses) in total net position.
The District uses the accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred. Grant revenue is recognized when program expenditures are incurred in accordance with program guidelines. When funds are received in advance of program expenditures, they are recorded as unearned revenues until earned. Earned but unbilled electric services are accrued as revenue. Electrical infrastructure is recorded as capital contributions and the costs are capitalized and included as a part of the electric transmission and distribution system.
Operating revenues and expenses consist of revenues and expenses that result from the ongoing principal operations of the District. Operating revenues consist primarily of charges for services. Nonoperating revenues and expenses consist of those revenues and expenses that are related to financing and investing types of activities and result from nonexchange transactions or ancillary activities.
The District maintains both restricted and unrestricted cash. Restricted cash is held in reserve and is spent exclusively for the intended purpose. In the event that the restricted cash is insufficient to complete the intended purpose, unrestricted cash is utilized.
Beginning with its audited financial statements for Fiscal Year 2016, the District implemented GASB Statement No. 68. As a result of implementing GASB Statement No. 68, the District restated the beginning net position in its Statement of Net Position for Fiscal Year 2015, effectively decreasing the net position as of April 1, 2014 by $18,142,553.
In the District’s audited financial statements for Fiscal Year 2017, certain reclassifications were made to the Fiscal Year 2016 financial statements to conform to current year presentation. There were no changes to
A-24 the ending net position and/or change in net position from the Fiscal Year 2016 audited presented figures. See Note 14 to the District’s audited financial statements in Appendix A-1 attached to the Official Statement.
For accounting policies relating specifically to the Electric System, see the notes to the financial statements in Appendix A-1 attached to the Official Statement.
ELECTRIC SYSTEM STRATEGIC PLAN AND OUTLOOK
Electric Rates
Historically, electric rates for the District’s customers have been lower than rates for PG&E customers. Based on current rates in place as of January 1, 2017, the District’s industrial and commercial rates are approximately 49.90% and 62.58%, respectively, of those charged by PG&E for such user classes. The District’s single family residential customers with an average monthly summer consumption of 1,250 kWh would pay an average of approximately 53% more if served by PG&E, while single family residential customers with a winter consumption of 750 kWh would pay an average of approximately 42% more if served by PG&E. The District cannot predict future rate actions with respect to PG&E or other utilities.
Customer Growth
The District expects to continue serving current commercial, industrial, agricultural and residential customers located in the cities and surrounding areas of Merced, Livingston and Atwater, as well as serving new residential subdivisions. For planning purposes, the District has projected growth in residential customers of approximately one percent per annum for the current and next four Fiscal Years. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—General.” For planning purposes, the District is projecting growth in commercial and industrial customers of approximately one percent per annum in the current and next four Fiscal Years. Such growth in commercial and industrial customers depends in part on the continued rate differential between the cost of power provided by the District as compared to PG&E and the construction of the South Transmission Line. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Future Electric System Improvements.”
Power Resource Portfolio Management
The District manages power supply risk, renewable resource procurement and compliance with State and federal environmental regulations (for example, GHG regulations) in an integrated fashion.
Congress requires WAPA and its customers, including the District, to provide an annual report of supply-side, demand-side, and renewable resource activities undertaken as a result of the National Energy Policy Act of 1992. These reports are available for review upon request from the District.
The cost of power under the current TID Power Contract is tied to the NP-15 Price Index price as calculated by the CAISO on an hourly basis. The District currently hedges a significant portion of such power cost as described under the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Swap Agreements.” The District expects to continue to hedge a significant portion of future power costs through swap contracts. For planning purposes, the District projects that it can enter into swap agreements for such purpose on similar terms and conditions to the District’s current swap program.
ELECTRIC SYSTEM FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION
Financial Statements
A copy of the most recent audited financial statements of the District prepared by Hudson, Henderson and Company, Inc., Certified Public Accountants, Fresno, California (the “Auditor”) are included as Appendix A-1 to the Official Statement (the “Financial Statements”). The Financial Statements are combined with
A-25 certain unaudited statistical and supplementary information to form the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Auditor’s letter concludes that the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the business-type activities of the District, as of March 31, 2017 and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Auditor is not required to, and has not been asked to, consent to the inclusion of the Financial Statements in this Official Statement.
The summary operating results contained under the caption “—Historic Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage” are derived from the Financial Statements (excluding certain non-cash items and after certain other adjustments) and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statements, including the notes thereto. See the Official Statement under the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS— Revenue Pledge Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments” and “—Rate Stabilization Fund” for a discussion of the recognition of certain revenues and operation and maintenance expenses under GAAP.
District Reserves
The District has established unrestricted funds to use current Electric System Revenues to satisfy future spending plans. The following table shows the District’s unrestricted funds and the respective balances as of March 31, 2017 with respect to its Electric System:
Balance as of March 31, 2017 New Customer Growth Fund $ 3,185,000 System Support and Growth Fund 28,947,988 Purchased Power Reserve Fund 13,051,000 Operating Reserve Fund 5,068,000 Catastrophe Fund 3,199,000
Source: District
Each of these reserves is funded in an amount equal to or greater than the respective targeted level under the current District reserve policy. The District currently does not have any monies which, under GAAP, would not be recognized as Electric System Revenues until the corresponding expenditure is made by the District. Such monies are currently on deposit in the Rate Stabilization Fund. The District may modify, amend or remove the use of such funds and the amounts. The District has additional reserves that are not designated but are expected to be applied toward other purposes.
A-26 Historic Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage
The following table is a summary of operating results of the District’s Electric System for the 15 month period ended March 31, 2013 and for Fiscal Years 2014 through 2017. These results have been derived from the District’s Financial Statements but exclude certain non-cash items and include certain other adjustments. The table has not been audited by the District’s Auditor.
Historic Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage
2013(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 REVENUES Electricity Sales and Services(2) $60,790,788 $52,655,884 $56,292,342 $54,167,965 $54,243,061 Interest Income 58,906 167,631 128,960 316,761 468,504 Other Revenues(3) 222,781 -- 142,976 151,201 114,049 Transfers In 66,975 1,534 ------Total Revenues(4) $61,139,450 $52,825,049 $56,564,278 $54,635,927 $54,825,614
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Purchase of Power $29,989,929 $28,583,744 $30,586,822 $27,475,015 $25,517,470 Electric Transmission and Distribution 10,010,831 7,772,591 7,742,320 6,053,562 6,714,099 Administrative and General(5) 1,957,902 1,844,538 1,467,584 2,053,619 2,168,669 Transfer Out(6) 37,880 1,225,252 983,692 975,792 954,400 Total Operation and Maintenance Expenses(4) $41,996,542 $39,426,125 $40,780,418 $36,557,988 $35,354,638
NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES(4) $19,142,906 $13,398,924 $15,783,860 $18,077,939 $19,470,976
DEBT SERVICE 2003 Electric Revenue COP $ 1,361,858 $ 637,953 ------2005 Bonds 5,735,494 4,220,469 $4,218,275 $2,214,067 -- 2005 Installment Purchase Contract 1,070,992 454,933 457,230 377,503 -- 2012 Electric Refunding Revenue Bond 268,949 469,900 459,130 463,580 462,920 2013 Bonds -- 348,596 768,394 547,576 -- 2015A Electric System Bonds ------1,870,989 4,833,513 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE(4) $8,437,292 $6,131,850 $5,903,029 $5,473,715 $5,296,433 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 2.27 2.19 2.67 3.30 3.68
NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR OTHER DISTRICT PURPOSES(4) $10,705,616 $ 7,267,074 $9,880,831 $12,604,224 $14,174,543
(1) Includes amounts for the 15 month period ended March 31, 2013. (2) Includes revenue from Electricity Sales (see the caption “FINANCIAL RESULTS OF THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Revenues”) in addition to certain other revenues generated from services provided by the District to retail electric customers. Amount for Fiscal Year 2014 includes administrative fees and miscellaneous revenues. (3) Includes other income, including administrative fees and miscellaneous revenue. (4) Totals may not add due to rounding. (5) Includes allocation of administrative costs, engineering, inter-fund credits related to work or equipment charged to capital projects and other funds. (6) Includes payments to Water Fund for permission fees payable by the Electric System for use of Water System rights-of-way. Source: District
Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage
The District’s projected Electric System operating results for the Fiscal Years ending March 31, 2018 to March 31, 2022 are set forth below, reflecting certain significant assumptions concerning future events and circumstances. The financial forecast represents the District’s estimate of projected financial results based on a variety of assumptions, including those described under the caption “ELECTRIC SYSTEM STRATEGIC PLAN AND OUTLOOK—Power Resource Portfolio Management” and assumptions set forth in the footnotes to the chart below. All of such assumptions are material in the development of the District’s financial projections, and variations in the assumptions may produce substantially different financial results. Actual
A-27 operating results achieved during the projection period may vary from those presented in the forecast and such variations may be material.
Projected Electric System Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage Fiscal Years ending March 31
2018(1) 2019 2020 2021 2022 REVENUES
Electricity Sales and Services(2) $ 63,478,000 $ 63,747,000 $ 64,774,000 $ 65,696,000 $ 66,324,000 Interest Income(3) 458,000 463,000 467,000 472,000 477,000 Other Revenues(4) 251,000 257,000 264,000 393,000 403,000 Transfers In(5) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenues $ 64,187,000 $ 64,467,000 $ 65,505,000 $ 66,561,000 $ 67,204,000
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS Purchase of Power(6) $ 33,223,000 $ 34,507,000 $ 35,542,000 $35,819,000 $ 36,205,000 Electric Transmission and Distribution(7) 8,269,000 8,517,000 8,773,000 9,036,000 9,307,000 Administrative and General(8) 2,640,000 2,719,000 2,801,000 2,885,000 2,971,000 Transfer Out(9) 982,000 1,011,000 1,042,000 1,073,000 1,105,000 Total Operation and Maintenance Expenses $ 45,114,000 $ 46,754,000 $ 48,158,000 $ 48,813,000 $ 49,588,000
NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES $ 19,370,000 $ 17,713,000 $ 17,347,000 $ 17,748,000 $ 17,616,000
DEBT SERVICE 2012 Electric Refunding Revenue Bond(10) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 2015A Electric System Bonds 4,828,000 4,825,000 4,820,000 4,822,000 4,545,000 2017A Electric System Bonds(11) 155,00 1,549,000 1,552,000 1,549,000 1,545,000 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE $ 4,983,000 $ 6,374,000 $ 6,372,000 $ 6,371,000 $ 6,090,000 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 3.66 2.78 2.72 2.79 2.89
NET ELECTRIC SYSTEM REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR OTHER DISTRICT PURPOSES $ 14,090,000 $ 11,339,000 $ 10,975,000 $ 11,377,000 $ 11,526,000
(1) Fiscal Year 2018 reflects budgeted amounts. (2) Projected amounts through Fiscal Year 2022 based on NP-15 forward curve. Projections also include an additional 41K MWh in purchased power driven by new customers, environmental charge, Merced Falls energy and capacity revenue approximately $919,000. Projected to increase by approximately 1% to 1.6% per annum from Fiscal Year 2019 through Fiscal Year 2022. (3) Interest income forecasted to increase by approximately 1% to 1.5% per annum. Excludes interest on notes and bonds payable. (4) Projected to increase by approximately 2.5% per annum through Fiscal Year 2022. (5) The District does not expect any transfers to the Electric Fund through Fiscal Year 2022. (6) Increase from Fiscal Year 2017 amount primarily as a result of the NP-15 forward curve, followed by an increase in power transmission costs due to addition of a demand transmission, as well as the increase in resource adequacy rate when compare to the planning reserve rate. Projections include the environmental charge. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Power Purchase Contracts—Renewable Resource Plan.” (7) Increase from Fiscal Year 2017 amount primarily as a result of projected increase in energy rates based on NP15 curve, increase in Energy Price Adder driven by higher transmission demand for industrial customers, and increase in power transmission costs due to addition of demand transmission. Projected to increase by 3% per annum from Fiscal Year 2019 through Fiscal Year 2022 (8) Includes allocation of administrative costs, engineering, inter-fund credits related to work or equipment charged to capital projects and other funds. Projected to increase 3% per annum from Fiscal Year 2019 through Fiscal Year 2022. (9) Includes payments to Water Fund for permission fees, rental payments relating to real property owned by the District and payments for services of other District departments for services provided to the Energy System. Projected to increase by 3% per annum from budgeted amount for Fiscal Year 2018 exclusive of such rental payment. (10) The District expects to prepay the outstanding 2012 Electric System Bonds from District reserves on or before the date of issuance of the 2017A Bonds. (11) Projected at an all in true interest cost of 3.80% and an aggregate principal amount of $19,990,000. Source: District.
A-28 RISK FACTORS
The purchase of the 2017A Bonds involves investment risk. Such risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following matters.
2017A Bonds are Limited Obligations
No funds of the District other than Net Electric System Revenues are pledged for the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments, and the credit or taxing power of the District is not pledged for the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments. No owner of any 2017A Bond may compel the exercise of the taxing power by the District or the forfeiture of any of its property. The principal of and interest on the Series 2017A Installment Payments are neither a debt of the District nor a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien or encumbrance upon any of its property or upon any of its income, receipts or revenues, except the Electric System Revenues and other funds, security or assets which are pledged to the payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments under the Installment Purchase Agreement.
Limitations on Remedies
The enforceability of the rights and remedies of the owners of the 2017A Bonds and the Trustee, and the obligations incurred by the District, may be subject to the following: the limitations on legal remedies against public entities in California; the federal bankruptcy code and applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally, now or hereafter in effect; principles of equity which may limit the specific enforcement under State law of certain remedies; the exercise by the United States of America of the powers delegated to it by the U.S. Constitution; and the reasonable and necessary exercise, in certain exceptional situations, of the police power inherent in the sovereignty of the state and its governmental bodies in the interest of serving a significant and legitimate public purpose. Bankruptcy proceedings, or the exercise of powers by the federal or State government, if initiated, could subject the owners of the 2017A Bonds to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or otherwise, and consequently may entail risks of delay, limitations or modification of their rights. Remedies may be limited since the Electric System serves an essential public purpose.
Electric System Expenses and Collections
The District’s Electric System, timely payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments and the financial condition of the District are dependent, in part, upon the payment by customers of the amounts billed to such customers for the energy and services they receive. There are multiple factors that might result in increased overall rates charged to such customers and, as a result, potentially have an adverse effect on collections. Many of these factors are not under the influence or control of the District or are factors over which the District has only limited influence or control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
Changes in General Economic Conditions. Significant changes in general economic conditions may be caused by, among other things, fluctuating business cycles, uncharacteristic weather patterns (such as droughts) or the occurrence of natural disasters (such as earthquakes or floods). In addition, the State’s economy faces a number of risks and pressures, including the threat of recession, potential changes to federal fiscal policies and large unfunded liabilities of the State’s pension and retiree healthcare plans. Such factors could lead to significant reductions in retail energy sales, resulting in increased retail rates for electric energy to offset reduced revenues.
Energy Market-Driven Increases in Wholesale Power Costs. Wholesale power costs are affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, natural gas prices, availability of hydroelectric power, mandated regulatory costs, availability of generation capacity, and transmission capacity.
A-29 Market Manipulation. The CAISO, with the approval from FERC, adopted tariffs, protocols and regulations governing the conduct of energy suppliers and other entities whose activities affect the energy market and transmission system. CAISO tariffs, protocols and regulations are intended, among other things, to prevent manipulation of the CAISO’s energy market and transmission system. The CAISO monitors the activities of participants, but manipulative behavior could occur, possibly resulting in higher or substantially higher costs.
Impact of These Factors. The factors discussed above (and other factors) might result in increased retail rates for electric energy while the 2017A Bonds remain outstanding. If a combination of one or more such factors lead to increased retail rates for electric energy, such increase could lead to increased delinquencies and non-payments by customers. See “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Electric System Rates and Charges” for a discussion of uncollectible accounts.
There can be no assurance that the District’s expenses for the Electric System will remain at the levels described in this Official Statement. Increases in energy costs, new environmental regulations, CAISO’s market prices or other expenses could reduce the Electric System Revenues and could require substantial increases in rates or charges. Such rate increases could increase the likelihood of nonpayment, and could also decrease demand.
Although the District has covenanted to prescribe, revise and collect rates and charges for the Electric System at certain levels as described in the Official Statement under the caption “SECURITY FOR THE 2017A BONDS— Rate Covenant Securing the Series 2017A Installment Payments,” there can be no assurance that such amounts will be collected in the amounts and at the times necessary to make timely payments with respect to the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Utility Bankruptcy
The District has entered into, and in the future may enter into, various power purchase, transmission service and other arrangements with PG&E, TID, or others. See “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Power Supply” and “—Transmission and Scheduling” above for a discussion of existing contracts and other arrangements. In the event of insolvency of PG&E or TID or other entities with which the District has, or is a beneficiary of, such contractual arrangements, in the bankruptcy proceedings PG&E or TID or other entities or their respective bankruptcy trustee must determine prior to the confirmation of its plan for reorganization, or within a shorter time period determined by the court, whether to assume or reject any of its executory contracts. The District may be subjected to payment delays pending this determination. In the event of assumption, the debtor would be required to cure any prior defaults and to provide adequate assurance of future performance under the relevant agreements. Rejection of an executory contract by the debtor would give rise to an unsecured claim of the other party or parties to the contract for contract rejection damages. In the event of rejection by the debtor in the bankruptcy proceedings of any of the contracts to which the District is a party or beneficiary, the District may be required to replace the services or power supplied under these arrangements at an increased cost, which could result in higher electric rates being charged by the District. The District is unable to determine the ultimate impact on the Electric System if PG&E or TID or other entities with which the District has, or is a beneficiary of the contractual arrangements described above, declares, or is forced into, bankruptcy.
Seismic Issues
Although the District has not experienced significant earthquake-related damage to its facilities, the Electric System and the power supplied by TID through its system could be adversely affected by a major local earthquake. See “—Casualty Risk.”
A-30 Casualty Risk
Any natural disaster or other physical calamity, including earthquake, may have the effect of reducing Net Electric System Revenues through damage to the Electric System, as well as TID’s or WAPA’s operations, and/or adversely affecting the economy of the surrounding area. In the event of material damage to Electric System facilities, there can be no assurance that insurance proceeds will be adequate to repair or replace such facilities. See “THE DISTRICT—Insurance” and “—Seismic Issues.”
LITIGATION
General. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, regulatory agency, public board or body, pending or, to the knowledge of the District, threatened against the District affecting the existence of the District or the titles of its directors or officers to their respective offices or seeking to restrain or to enjoin the sale or delivery of the 2017A Bonds, the application of the proceeds thereof in accordance with the Indenture, or in any way contesting or affecting the validity or enforceability of the 2017A Bonds, the Indenture or any action of the District contemplated by any of said documents, or in any way contesting the completeness or accuracy of this Official Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, or contesting the powers of the District or its authority with respect to the 2017A Bonds or any action of the District contemplated by any of said documents, nor to the knowledge of the District, is there any basis therefor.
Electric System Litigation. There exist lawsuits and claims against the District in connection with the Electric System which are incidental to the ordinary course of business of the operation of the Electric System. In the view of the District’s General Counsel, there is no such litigation present or pending, which will individually or in the aggregate materially impair the District’s ability to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments.
Other District Litigation. There exist lawsuits and claims against the District relating to other District activities separate from the business of the Electric System. In the view of the District’s General Counsel, there is no such litigation present or pending, which will individually or in the aggregate materially impair the District’s ability to pay the Series 2017A Installment Payments from Electric System Revenues.
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON APPROPRIATIONS AND CHARGES
Article XIIIB
The State Constitution limits the annual appropriations of the State and of any city, county, school district, authority or other political subdivision of the State to the level of appropriations of the particular governmental entity for the prior fiscal year, as adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population. The “base year” for establishing such appropriation limit is the 1978-79 fiscal year and the limit is to be adjusted annually to reflect changes in population and consumer prices. Adjustments in the appropriations limit of an entity may also be made if: (i) the financial responsibility for a service is transferred to another public entity or to a private entity; (ii) the financial source for the provision of services is transferred from taxes to other revenues; or (iii) the voters of the entity approve a change in the limit for a period of time not to exceed four years.
Appropriations subject to Article XIIIB generally include the proceeds of taxes levied by the State or other entity of local government, exclusive of certain State subventions and refunds of taxes. “Proceeds of taxes” include, but are not limited to, all tax revenues and the proceeds to an entity of government from: (a) regulatory licenses, user charges, and user fees (but only to the extent such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the service or regulation); and (b) the investment of tax revenues. Article XIIIB includes a requirement that if an entity’s revenues in any year exceed the amounts permitted to be spent, the excess would have to be returned by revising tax rates or fee schedules over the subsequent two years.
A-31 Certain expenditures are excluded from the appropriations limit including payments of indebtedness existing or legally authorized as of January 1, 1979, or of bonded indebtedness thereafter approved by the voters and payments required to comply with court or federal mandates which without discretion require an expenditure for additional services or which unavoidably make the providing of existing services more costly.
The District is of the opinion that the rates imposed by the District do not exceed the costs that the District reasonably bears in providing Electric Service. The District will covenant in the Installment Purchase Agreement that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, it will prescribe rates and charges that it reasonably expects to be sufficient to provide Net Electric System Revenues for payment of the Series 2017A Installment Payments in each year.
Proposition 218
General. An initiative measure entitled the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” (the “Initiative”) was approved by the voters of the State of California in 1996. The Initiative added Article XIIIC and Article XIIID to the California Constitution. According to the “Title and Summary” of the Initiative prepared by the California Attorney General, the Initiative limits “the authority of local governments to impose taxes and property-related assessments, fees and charges.”
Article XIIID. Article XIIID creates additional requirements for the imposition by most local agencies, including the District, of general taxes, special taxes, assessments and property-related assessments, fees and charges. By its terms, however, Article XIIID explicitly exempts fees for the provision of electric service from the provisions of such article. See the caption “THE ELECTRIC SYSTEM—Electric System Rates and Charges.
Article XIIIC. Article XIIIC provides that the initiative power shall not be prohibited or otherwise limited in matters of reducing or repealing any local tax, assessment, fee or charge and that the power of initiative to affect local taxes, assessments, fees and charges shall be applicable to all local governments. Article XIIIC does not define the terms “local tax,” “assessment,” “fee” or “charge,” so it was unclear whether the definitions set forth in Article XIIID referred to above are applicable to Article XIIIC. Moreover, the provisions of Article XIIIC are not expressly limited to local taxes, assessments, fees and charges imposed after November 6, 1996. On July 24, 2006, the Supreme Court held in Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil, 39 Cal.4th 205 (2006), that the provisions of Article XIIIC included rates and fees charged for domestic water use. In the decision, the Court noted that the decision did not address whether an initiative to reduce fees and charges could override statutory rate setting obligations. On August 11, 1980, the Court of Appeal held in Bock v. City Council of Lompoc, 109 Cal.App.3d. 52 (1980), that electric rates are subject to the initiative power. Therefore, rates charged for electricity service (which are expressly exempt from the provisions of Article XIIID) may be subject to the provisions of Article XIIIC, thereby subjecting such charges imposed by the District to reduction by the voters within the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District does not believe that Article XIIIC grants to the voters within the District the power to repeal or reduce the charges for electricity service in a manner which would be inconsistent with the contractual obligations of the District. However, there can be no assurance of the availability of particular remedies adequate to protect the beneficial owners of the 2017A Bonds. Remedies available to beneficial owners of the 2017A Bonds in the event of a default by the District are dependent upon judicial actions which are often subject to discretion and delay and could prove both expensive and time-consuming to obtain.
In addition to the specific limitations on remedies contained in the applicable documents themselves, the rights and obligations with respect to the 2017A Bonds, the Indenture and the Installment Purchase Agreement are subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent conveyance and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights, to the application of equitable principles if equitable remedies are sought, and to the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases and to limitations on legal remedies against public agencies in the State. The various opinions of counsel to be delivered with respect to such
A-32 documents, including the opinion of Bond Counsel (the form of which is attached as Appendix D), will be similarly qualified.
Proposition 26
On November 2, 2010, voters in the State approved Proposition 26. Proposition 26 amends Article XIIIC to expand the definition of “tax” to include “any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government” except the following: (1) a charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege; (2) a charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product; (3) a charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; (4) a charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property; (5) a fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government, as a result of a violation of law; (6) a charge imposed as a condition of property development; and (7) assessments and property-related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIIID. Proposition 26 provides that the local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. The District does not believe that the enactment of Proposition 26 affects its ability to charge for services provided by its Electric System.
A-33 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] EXHIBIT A-1
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 744 W 20th Street · Merced, CA. 95340
This Page Left Blank Intentionally
Merced Irrigation District of Merced, California
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the Fiscal Years Ended
March 31, 2017 and 2016
Prepared by the
Finance Department
Brian Stubbert, Chief Financial Officer Kandi Ramos, Controller Melissa Bertonneau, Budget and Reporting Analyst
744 West 20th Street, Merced, California 95340 209-722-5761 www.mercedid.org
This Page Left Blank Intentionally MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
Table of Contents Page Number INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i District Service Area Map xi District Officials xii Organization Chart xiii
FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors' Report 3 Management's Discussion and Analysis 7 Basic Financial Statements: 15 Statements of Net Position 16 Statements of Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 18 Statements of Cash Flows 19 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 21 Required Supplementary Information 61 Schedule of Funding Progress Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) 62 Schedule of Changes in the Net Position Liability and Related Ratios 63 Schedule of Contributions 64 Supplemental Information 65 Combining Statement of Net Position 66 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 74 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 78 Debt Service Ratio Related to Outstanding COP and Bonds Energy Resources 86 Debt Service Ratio Related to Outstanding COPS and Bonds Water Resources and Hydroelectric Project 87
STATISTICAL SECTION 89 Index to Statistical Section 91 Financial Trends: Table I Net Position by Component 93 Table II Changes in Net Position 94 Table III Cash and Investment Balance Summary 95 Revenue Capacity: Table IV Assessed Value of Taxable Property 96 Table V Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 97 Table VI Principal Property Taxpayers 98 Table VII Property Tax Levies and Collected 99 Table VIII Water Rates Based on Irrigation Season for Water Resources 100 Table IX Energy Resources Electric Rate Monthly Charge per Meter 101 Table X Energy Resources Electric Service by Rate Schedules Stated per Kilowatt 102 Debt Capacity: Table XI Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type &