DOCSLIB.ORG

Merced River Water Temperature Feasibility Investigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Merced River Water Temperature Feasibility Investigation Merced River Water Temperature Feasibility Investigation Reconnaissance Report December 29, 2003 Prepared for: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Anadromous Fish Restoration Program Prepared by: David A. Vogel, Senior Scientist Natural Resource Scientists, Inc. P.O. Box 1210 Red Bluff, CA 96080 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Background....................................................................................................................................1 The Merced River Development Project ...................................................................................................................4 History ......................................................................................................................................................................4 Description of Project Facilities..............................................................................................................................6 New Exchequer Dam/Lake McClure ...................................................................................................................6 McSwain Dam and Reservoir...............................................................................................................................7 Merced Falls Dam and Forebay...........................................................................................................................7 Crocker-Huffman Dam and Reservoir.................................................................................................................8 Merced River Hatchery.........................................................................................................................................8 Water Project Operating Strategies, Requirements, and Agreements .................................................................10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control ....................................................................................................10 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ..............................................................................................12 Davis-Grunsky Agreement ...................................................................................................................................12 Cowell Agreement Diversions...............................................................................................................................13 Stevinson Diversions..............................................................................................................................................13 Merced ID Main Canal and Northside Canal Diversions ..................................................................................14 Vernalis Adaptive Management Plan and San Joaquin River Agreement.......................................................14 Merced River Adaptive Management Plan (MRAMP)......................................................................................17 Additional 12,500 Acre-Feet October Flows .......................................................................................................17 Miscellaneous Water Withdrawals ......................................................................................................................17 Lake Don Pedro Community Services District ..................................................................................................17 Mariposa County Public Utilities District..........................................................................................................17 Merced ID Campground Facilities ....................................................................................................................18 Accretions/Depletions .........................................................................................................................................18 Merced Water Supply Plan...................................................................................................................................18 Historical Water Year Classifications......................................................................................................................19 Recent Historical Operations of the Merced River Development Project............................................................20 Merced River Simulation Model (MRSIM) ........................................................................................................21 Main Canal Diversions..........................................................................................................................................23 Northside Canal Diversions ..................................................................................................................................23 Stream Flow, Reservoir, and Weather Records......................................................................................................24 Lower Merced River Chinook Salmon Phenology and Monitoring......................................................................42 Chinook Salmon Phenology..................................................................................................................................42 Salmon Monitoring................................................................................................................................................43 CDFG Annual Spawning Ground Surveys........................................................................................................43 CDFG/Merced ID Memorandum of Understanding Biological Studies ..........................................................44 Juvenile Salmon Outmigration ..........................................................................................................................47 Merced River Corridor Restoration Plan...........................................................................................................47 USFWS AFRP Projects......................................................................................................................................47 Water Temperature Monitoring .........................................................................................................................48 Water Temperature Models .....................................................................................................................................65 Merced River and Lake McClure Water Temperature Model .........................................................................65 Lake McClure Temperature Model....................................................................................................................65 Merced River Temperature Model .....................................................................................................................66 Alternative Flow Analyses..................................................................................................................................67 Proposed Expanded Merced River and Reservoirs Water Temperature Models ...........................................68 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................73 References ..................................................................................................................................................................74 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Merced River Water Temperature Feasibility Investigation – Reconnaissance Report Page i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Merced River and its four dams. ............................................................................................................2 Figure 2. Longitudinal schematic of New Exchequer Dam on the Merced River .......................................................6 Figure 3. Longitudinal schematic of McSwain Dam on the Merced River .................................................................7 Figure 4. Flood control storage space criteria for Lake McClure/New Exchequer Dam............................................11 Figure 5. Classification of water year types for the San Joaquin River basin.............................................................20 Figure 6. Historical monthly average flow (acre-feet) downstream of Merced Falls Dam prior to the construction of Exchequer Dam, during Exchequer Dam operations, and after construction of New Exchequer Dam...............21 Figure 7. Merced River Simulation Model (MRSIM) schematic including description of nodes .............................22 Figure 8. Historical water diversions (acre-feet) into Merced ID’s Main Canal. .......................................................23 Figure 9. Historical water diversions (acre-feet) into Merced ID’s Northside Canal for the period 1970 through 1999. ....................................................................................................................................................................24 Figure 10. Location of stations in the Merced River watershed downstream of New Exchequer Dam. ....................25 Figure 11. Weather data stations located near the Merced River watershed. .............................................................26 Figure 12. Freshwater life history periodicity for San Joaquin River basin fall-run Chinook salmon. ......................43 Figure 13. Locations of water temperature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment 1 Credentials of Trlia Board of Senior Consultants
    ATTACHMENT 1 CREDENTIALS OF TRLIA BOARD OF SENIOR CONSULTANTS FAIZ I. MAKDISI, PH.D., P.E. PRINCIPAL ENGINEER EDUCATION SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Ph.D., Geotechnical Dr. Makdisi’s 28-year career has combined applied research and Engineering, University of professional practice in geotechnical and foundation/earthquake California, Berkeley, 1976 engineering for commercial, residential, industrial, and critical M.Sc., Geotechnical structures. Recently he has focused on geotechnical studies and safety Engineering, University of evaluations of earth and rockfill dams, embankments, and landfills. His California, Berkeley, 1971 work includes feasibility evaluations and preliminary design studies; field investigation design and planning; borrow area material studies; in B. Eng., Civil, American situ and laboratory testing; and evaluation and interpretation of static University of Beirut: and dynamic material properties of dams and their foundations. Studies Lebanon, 1970 also included stability evaluations of embankment slopes, seepage analyses, and static and dynamic stress analyses to evaluate stability REGISTRATION during earthquakes. Professional Civil Engineer, He has performed studies to determine earthquake-induced permanent CA No. C29432, 1978 deformations in slopes and embankments, and developed and published Civil Engineer, Institute of widely used simplified procedures for estimating dynamic response and Civil Engineers, Lebanon, permanent deformations in earth and rockfill dams and embankments. 1970 He is a lead participant in earthquake ground motion studies and development of seismic design criteria for key facilities such as dams AFFILIATIONS and nuclear power plants. He was principal investigator of the “Stability American Society of Civil of Slopes, Embankments and Rockfalls” chapter of the Seismic Retrofit Engineers Manual for the Federal Highway Project being prepared for the National Earthquake Engineering Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
    [Show full text]
  • System Reoperation Study
    System Reoperation Study Phase III Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies California Department of Water Resources August 2017 System Reoperation Study Phase III Report This page is intentionally left blank. August 2017 | 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.1 Study Authorization ....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.2 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1 -2 1.3 Planning Principles .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.4 Related Studies and Programs...................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.5 Uncertainties in Future Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5.1 Climate Change ..........................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY of INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY of MERCED RIVER at the CONFLUENCE with SAN JOAQUIN RIVER a Project Presented to the Faculty
    STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of Civil Engineering California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil Engineering (Water Resources Engineering) by Hani Nour SUMMER 2017 © 2017 Hani Nour ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER A Project by Hani Nour Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Saad Merayyan __________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Cristina Poindexter, P.E. ___________________________ Date iii Student: Hani Nour I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. _________________________, Department Chair ______________ Dr. Benjamin Fell, P.E. Date Department of Civil Engineering iv Abstract of STUDY OF INCREASING CONVEY CAPACITY OF MERCED RIVER AT THE CONFLUNENCE WITH SAN JOAQUIN RIVER by Hani Nour Flooding in California’s Central Valley is very common and expected to occur every year anywhere throughout the region. The climate and geography of the Central Valley, together, are responsible for over flow streams, rivers, and lakes causing water flooding, particularly at the lower elevation areas. San Joaquin Basin is located between the Sierra Nevada (on the east) and the Coast Ranges (on the west) where flooding is typically characterized by infrequent severe storms during winter season due to heavy rain and snow- melt runoff coming from the foothills, east of Merced County (Jesse Patchett 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Ferguson Rock Slide Buries California State Highway Near Yosemite
    Recent Landslides Landslides Edwin L. Harp . Mark E. Reid . Jonathan W. Godt . Jerome V. DeGraff . Alan J. Gallegos DOI 10.1007/s10346-008-0120-9 Received: 14 June 2007 Accepted: 18 January 2008 Ferguson rock slide buries California State Highway near © Springer-Verlag 2008 Yosemite National Park Abstract During spring 2006, talus from the toe area of a rock- about future movement of the approximately 800,000-m3 slide mass. block slide of about 800,000 m3 buried California State Highway Normally, the highway accommodates about 800,000 vehicles per 140, one of the main routes into heavily-visited Yosemite National year. During the 92 days in 2006 when the highway was completely Park, USA. Closure of the highway for 92 days caused business closed, the nearby city of Mariposa sustained losses in tax and losses of about 4.8 million USD. The rock slide, composed of slate business community revenue of about 4.8 million USD (Rick Benson, and phyllite, moved slowly downslope from April to June 2006, Mariposa County Administrator, personal communication, 2007), creating a fresh head scarp with 9–12 m of displacement. traffic congestion increased on other routes to Yosemite National Movement of the main rock slide, a re-activation of an older Park, and local residents and school children endured greatly slide, was triggered by an exceptionally wet spring 2006, following lengthened commutes. Moreover, future downslope movement of a a very wet spring 2005. As of autumn 2006, most of the main slide large part of the slide mass could potentially impact the highway appeared to be at rest, although rocks occasionally continued to realignment and dam or alter the Merced River, a designated fall from steep, fractured rock masses at the toe area of the slide.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan Kelly Director of Regulatory Compliance and Government Affairs, Water Merced Irrigation District
    Bryan Kelly Director of Regulatory Compliance and Government Affairs, Water Merced Irrigation District Testimony on H.R. 869 - To clarify the definition of flood control operations for the purposes of the operation and maintenance of Project No. 2179 on the Lower Merced River. Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands June 14, 2011 Chairman Bishop, Ranking Member Grijalva, and members of the Subcommittee, my name is Bryan Kelly and I am the Director of Regulatory Compliance and Government Affairs -Water for the Merced Irrigation District (MID). I am pleased to be offered this opportunity to testify in support of H.R. 869, legislation that would allow the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to consider proposed improvements to the spillway at New Exchequer Dam that will provide additional water supply to Merced County and the San Joaquin Valley of California. I’d like to begin by thanking Congressman Denham and the cosponsors of H.R. 869 for introducing this bipartisan bill that could improve the precarious water supply situation in California’s San Joaquin Valley without major environmental impact and at no cost to the federal government. The Merced Irrigation District is a California Public Agency under the California Irrigation District Law. MID owns, operates and maintains hydro-electric facilities on the Merced River, consisting of the New Exchequer Dam and Reservoir (Lake McClure) and McSwain Dam and Reservoir (Lake McSwain). They are located in the western foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountain range, approximately 23 miles northeast of the City of Merced. Lake McClure has a storage capacity of 1,024,600 acre feet, while Lake McSwain has a storage capacity of 9,730 acre feet and is operated principally as a regulating reservoir for MID’s hydroelectric generation facilities at New Exchequer Dam (FERC Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacation Planner Yosemite & Mariposa County Tourism Bureau
    YOSEMITE & MARIPOSA COUNTY VACATION PLANNER YOSEMITE & MARIPOSA COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU 866-425-3366 • YOSEMITEEXPERIENCE.COM COULTERVILLE Your Adventure Starts Here While the possibilities are endless to enjoy Yosemite National Park and the surrounding county, this guide will help HORNITOS you take it all in and ensure you make the most of your trip. Visit the must-sees, such as Half Dome and Yosemite Falls, experience Gold Rush history at one of the many museums, bike or hike the nearly endless paths and trails, or just take in the scenery at one of the many relaxing hotels, resorts, vacation rentals or B&B’s. … Happy traveling! 4 | VACATION PLANNER tuolumne meadows Tenaya LAKE YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK YOSEMITE VALLEY Foresta EL PORTAL Yosemite WEST BADGER PASS MARIPOSA GROVE HISTORIC HORNITOS mariposa FISH CAMP CATHEYS VALLEY YOSEMITEEXPERIENCE.COM | 5 Welcome to Adventure County Nestled among natural monuments, vineyards, and historic Gold Rush landmarks, Mariposa County, home to Yosemite National Park, is Adventure County! Located about 200 miles east of San Francisco, 300 miles north of Los Angeles and a little more than 400 miles northwest of Las Vegas, it is a must-see for any California tour itinerary. Alive with possibility, it’s a world-class destination for all seasons that inspires curiosity, refreshes the soul, and proves that you don’t need to be rich to live life to its fullest. The simple pleasures here are closer than you think—less than a tank of gas away for most Californians. There’s a lot to see, but this county is not just for viewing from a distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code 6717-01-P
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/16/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-06402, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE 6717-01-P FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Merced Irrigation District Project No. 2179-043 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TENDERED FOR FILING WITH THE COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR LICENSING AND DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF FINAL AMENDMENTS Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection. a. Type of Application: New License b. Project No.: 2179-043 c. Date Filed: February 27, 2012 d. Applicant: Merced Irrigation District (MID) e. Name of Project: Merced River Hydroelectric Project f. Location: The existing project is located on the Merced River in Merced and Mariposa counties, California. The project would occupy 3,152.9 acres of federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management. g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 USC 791 (a)-825(r) h. Applicant Contact: Merced Irrigation District, P.O. Box 2288, Merced CA, 95344; Telephone (209) 722-5761 i. FERC Contact: Matt Buhyoff, (202) 502-6824 or [email protected] j. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this time. k. The Project Description: The project consists of two developments: New Exchequer Development - (1) New Exchequer Dam - a 490 feet-high dam with a crest length of 1,220 feet and a crest elevation of 879 feet; (2) an ogee-type Project No. 2179-043 2 concrete spillway located
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento River and San Joaquin River) San Joaquin River Or Proposed San Luis Drain Extension, Sacramento River
    FIGURES Selenium source Organic carbon-enriched sediment deposits Depositional environments Freshwater Seawater Geologic sources Coal Soils and Alluvium Oil Phosphorite Anthropogenic Power Generation Irrigation Refining Mining activity Pollutants Ash, Flue Gas Scrubbing Subsurface drainage Wastewater Tailings, runoff Kesterson NWR, San Francisco Blackfoot San Joaquin River, Receiving waters Belews Lake, Bay-Delta River watershed, (examples) North Carolina Tulare Basin, California Estuary, California Idaho scoter, scaup, coot, duck, grebe Species of bluegill, sunfish, sturgeon, splittail, trout, coot, horse, concern bass, bullhead avocet, stilt, sculpin, splittail, salmon flounder, salmon, sheep, elk, cow Dungeness crab Figure 1. Conceptual model of Se pollution with examples of source deposits, anthropogenic activities, receiving water bodies, and biota at risk. Bay-Delta Selenium Model Composite Source Load ¸ Composite Volume (oil refinery discharges, agricultural drainage via (Sacramento River and San Joaquin River) San Joaquin River or proposed San Luis Drain extension, Sacramento River Composite Freshwater Endmember Concentration (head of estuary) Transformation Phytoplankton, algae, bacteria Dissolved species Partitioning (Kd) suspended particulate material and bed sediment (selenate, selenite, organo-Se) (elemental Se, particulate organo-Se, adsorbed selenite/selenate) bioaccumulation prey clams zooplankton amphipods trophic transfer sturgeon splittail striped bass predators diving ducks flounder splittail effects Impaired reproduction, teratogenesis, selenosis Figure 2. Conceptual model describing linked factors that determine the effects of selenium on ecosystems. The sequence of relations links environmental concentrations to biological effects. The general term “bioaccumulation” can be applied to all of the biological levels of selenium transfer through the food web, but in this report we use the term explicitly in reference to particulate/invertebrate bioaccumulation. 122°30' 122°00' .
    [Show full text]
  • Oroville Dam Citizens Advisory Commission
    OROVILLE DAM CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMISSION Hosted by the California Natural Resources Agency ITEM 1: WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS ITEM 2: NOVEMBER MEETING RECAP AND UPDATES ITEM 3: U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS BRIEFING USACE ROLE IN NORTHERN CA FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS 237 217 200 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27 .59 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 255 Oroville0 Dam163 Citizens132 Advisory65 Commission135 92 102 56 120 255 Southside0 163 Oroville122 Community53 Center120 56 130 48 111 Oroville, CA February 21, 2020 Joe Forbis, P.E. Chief, Water Management Section Sacramento District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.” AGENDA • USACE Sacramento District Overview • Authorities, Roles, and Responsibilities • Water Control Manuals – Folsom Example • Pilot Project - FIRO Spillway Fuse Gates at Terminus Dam SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION SACRAMENTO DISTRICT FC PROJECTS 8 SACRAMENTO DISTRICT (SPK) WATER MANAGEMENT USACE – 14 Section 7 – 31 Total – 45 SPK RESERVOIR EXAMPLES Largest Reservoir Shasta Dam and Lake 4,500,000 acre-feet Smallest Reservoir Mountain Dell Dam and Reservoir 3,200 acre-feet FLOOD OPS PARTNERS • Irrigation Districts – Stockton East Water District • Flood Control Districts – Fresno Metro Flood Control District • Federal Water Masters – Truckee River Basin Reservoirs • Water Storage Districts – Tulare Lakebed • Government Agencies – DWR – USBR Black Butte Dam USACE AUTHORITY FOR FLOOD OPS • Section 7 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (58 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses
    Nevada Irrigation District Staff Report for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, August 14, 2019 TO: Honorable Board of Directors FROM: Keane Sommers, P.E., Hydroelectric Manager Dar Chen, P.E., G.E., Senior Engineer - Dam Safety DATE: August 7, 2019 SUBJECT: Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses HYDROELECTRIC RECOMMENDATION: Award a sole source contract in the amount of $225,581.30 to Quest Structures for the Bowman South Dam Seismic Stability Analyses, and authorize the General Manager to execute the necessary documents. BACKGROUND: Bowman South Dam is a 105-foot-high and 567-foot-long concrete arch dam built in 1927 in a small canyon south of Bowman North Rockfill Dam. Both of the dams form Bowman Lake, which stores and transmits water from 6 other reservoirs on Canyon Creek and the Middle Yuba River upstream to Canyon Creek and the Bowman- Spaulding Canal downstream. According to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Division of Safety of Dams of California (DSOD), Bowman South is classified as an extremely-high-hazard dam due to the potential impacts on the downstream lives and properties in the case of its failure. It is approximately 15 miles west of the Mohawk Valley fault, which can generate up to a magnitude 7.3 earthquake. The last seismic stability analysis for the dam was performed in the mid-1990s. The study identified potential instabilities at the left abutment thrust block. Since then, the seismic criteria and the method of stability analyses have greatly evolved. Based on their dam safety inspections in 2012 and 2016, the FERC required Independent Consultants recommended that the District complete seismic stability analysis updates of the dam based on the latest seismic ground motions and methods of analysis, which include 3-D non-linear, dynamic, finite-element modeling of the dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Merced Irrigation District Drought Protection Water Management Model Project
    Environmental Assessment Merced Irrigation District Drought Protection Water Management Model Project October 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region October 2016 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitment to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Need for the Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 4 1.3 Resources Not Analyzed in Detail .................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Indian Trust Assets ...................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Environmental Justice ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]