Shifting Cultivators

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shifting Cultivators Shifting cultivators Local technical knowledge and natural resource management in the humid tropics by Katherine Warner FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1991 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Design and lay-out by Lynn Ball Illustrations by L. V. Pascual Cervera All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1991 iii Preface In 1990, within its Forestry for Community Development Programme, the FAO Forestry Department published Community Forestry Note 4, "Herders' Decision-Making in Natural Resources Management in Arid and Semi- Arid Africa". This was the first step in filling an information gap on what knowledge rural people have developed in the management of trees and forests in relation to their production systems. Dr. Katherine Warner, an anthropologist with a special focus on shifting cultivation systems, follows with this Community Forestry Note 8. "Shifting Cultivators" highlights the local technical knowledge applied by swidden/fallow farmers when making resource management decisions. This is an especially timely volume as it brings together data and provides valuable analysis of a practice that is currently in ill repute with forestry planners and environmentalists. Dr. Warner does not claim that shifting cultivators can continue with their systems, especially in the face of competing land and tree uses for their fallow areas. She does, however, point out valuable lessons that can be learned from the long-term swidden/fallow cultivators about sustainable use of tropical forests. She provides suggestions for the evolution of systems based on what these women and men farmers already know and use in providing a livelihood for their families in difficult tropical environments. The development of "Shifting Cultivators" was supported by the Community Forestry Unit and by an interdepartmental working group and a number of outside reviewers. The study was partially funded from a multi- donor trust fund, Forests, Trees and People, dedicated to increased sustainable livelihoods for women and men in developing countries, especially the rural poor, through self-help management of tree and forest resources. "Shifting Cultivators" is to be followed by documents on private tree management of single trees (for production of various products) and of trees in spatial arrangements (including indigenous agroforestry), and on communal management of woodlands. It is hoped that this series of studies will prove useful in pointing out the importance of local knowledge and resource management strategies, and will provide more effective support of local people in their effort to improve their current and future well-being through better tree and woodland management. M.R. de Montalembert Chief, Planning and Institutions Service Forestry Department v Executive summary Integral swidden has been, and continues to be, practiced throughout the tropics. Integral swidden is a land use system based on a "traditional, year-round, community-wide, largely self-contained and ritually sanctioned way of life" that is still prevalent among tribal minorities in Southeast Asia and South America and a small, declining percentage of African farmers (Conklin 1957:2). Swidden agriculture is one component, albeit the major one, of the larger agroecosystem. This agroecosystem includes not only agriculture, but also forest collection, hunting, fishing and, in some areas, cash cropping. All too often in the past swidden was perceived as exploiting, not managing, the natural resources of the humid tropics. However recent research, and reinterpretation of past research, has shown that natural resource management does occur. The natural resource management of the integral swiddener is focused on maintaining the highly valued diversity of the forest ecosystem. Although the forest may be cut, the swidden practices of small dispersed clearings, selective weeding, and planting and protection of trees actually aid the forest in its return. Other resources, such as animals and fish, are also managed within a worldview that looks beyond immediate needs to future sustainability. Such swidden/fallow systems are not rigid in their adaptation, but show flexibility in response to changes in the environment or to shifts from one locale to another. Analysis of numerous examples of traditional practices suggests that the integral swiddener succeeds by accepting and working within the constraints of the natural processes associated with the year-round growing season and rapid ecological succession in the humid tropics. The utilization of natural processes, combined with an intimate knowledge of the microenvironments of forest and field and the microsite needs of specific crops, enables swidden/fallow to succeed where other land use systems have failed. Although successful in the past, swidden-based agroecosystems cannot serve as the model for the future of the tropics. The tropical forest, so crucial for the swidden/fallow agroecosystem, is precipitously declining in area as it falls under increasing pressure from landless settlers, logging concerns, and national financial needs. However the local technical knowledge found in integral swidden societies can contribute to better natural resource management and the development of sustainable agroecological systems. Swiddeners can be active participants in designing new agroecosystems to meet the challenges of a constricting resource base. There is a need for on-farm research in swidden communities to aid in the development of new cropping systems for intensification of the swidden system. Such research may also lead to innovations that can be utilized by non-swidden smallholders in the tropics. It is also recommended that agricultural and forestry extension agents be trained in the general principles of swidden systems: utilization of microenvironment differences, integration of trees into smallholder agroecosystems, and perception of agriculture as being one component in the larger agroecosystem. Contents PREFACE iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v TABLE OF CONTENTS vii CHAPTER 1. LOCAL TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE, SHIFTING CULTIVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1 Introduction 1 Local technical knowledge and natural resource management 2 Local technical knowledge 2 What are the natural resources? 3 The natural resources of the humid tropics: forest and soils 4 Forest 4 Soils 7 Shifting cultivation 9 What is shifting cultivation? 9 Who are the shifting cultivators? 9 CHAPTER 2. SHIFTING CULTIVATION AS A RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR THE TROPICS 11 Swidden and tropical soils 12 Mobility and forest maintenance 14 Variation in swidden systems 14 Maintenance of the agroecosystem 14 Swidden as a form of forest 15 Multifields 16 Agroecosystem dynamics: the development of a local farming system 17 Development of the tropical crop repertoire 17 Use of natural process 19 CHAPTER 3. THE SWIDDEN/FALLOW SYSTEM 21 Overview: variation and similarity 21 Climate 21 Terrain 22 Population 22 Settlement pattern 22 Household autonomy in decision making 23 The swidden/fallow cycle 23 Site selection and clearing 23 Burning 35 Planting 38 Weeding and protecting 42 Harvesting, yields and processing 44 Succession and rotation 45 Resource management: hunting and fishing components of the agroecosystem 48 CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS 53 Sustainability 53 New strategies 54 The role of government and donor agencies 55 BIBLIOGRAPHY 57 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Model of tropical forest ecosystem dynamics with swidden 13 Figure 2. Site selection 25 Figure 3. Southeast Asia: local topographic classification 26 Figure 4. Amazon: local soil classification 27 Figure 5. Southeast Asia: local soil classification 28 Figure 6. Size of field 31 Figure 7 Southeast Asia: indicators of when to start clearing the swidden field 32 Figure 8. Desanâ agricultural calendar 33 Figure 9. Local indicators of the coming of the rains and the optimal time to burn 37 Figure 10. Southeast Asia: local indicators of the time to plant 39 Figure 11. Desanâ fishing and gathering calendar 49 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Extent of warm humid tropics (million hectares) 4 Table 2. Effects of methods of deforestation on runoff and erosion 7 LIST OF BOXES Box 1. Burning anxiety and adaptation: Tagbanwa of Palawan 36 Box 2. Amazonian planting patterns 40 Chapter 1 Local technical knowledge, shifting cultivation and natural resource management INTRODUCTION This forestry note will examine the local technical knowledge (LTK) of the traditional swiddener and how it is utilized for natural resource management in the humid tropics. Starting with a review of the environment of the humid tropics and the problems of natural resource management in the region, the note will go on to an analysis of shifting cultivation
Recommended publications
  • 'Slash and Burn' Farmers Is Deforesting Mainland Southeast Asia
    How Blaming ‘Slash and Burn’ Farmers is Deforesting Mainland Southeast Asia JEFFERSON M. FOX AsiaPacific ISSUES Analysis from the East-West Center SUMMARY For decades, international lenders, agencies, and foundations No. 47 December 2000 as well as national and local governments have spent millions of dollars trying The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to to “modernize” the traditional practices of farmers in many mountainous foster mutual understanding and cooperation among the govern- areas of Southeast Asia—an agenda driven by the belief that their age-old ments and peoples of the Asia Pacific region, including the United shifting cultivation practices (known pejoratively as “slash and burn”) are States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. government deforesting Asia. But a new look at how forests fare under shifting cultivation with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, (as opposed to under permanent agriculture) clearly demonstrates that efforts corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. to eliminate the ancient practice have actually contributed to deforestation, The AsiaPacific Issues series 1 contributes to the Center’s role as loss of biodiversity, and reduction in carbon storage. In fact, shifting cultiva- a neutral forum for discussion of issues of regional concern. The tion, rather than being the hobgoblin of tropical forest conservation, may be views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those ecologically appropriate, culturally suitable, and under certain circumstances of the Center. the best means for preserving biodiversity in the region. The real threat to these tropical forests is posed by the steady advance of large-scale permanent and commercial agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Slash-And-Burn Experiments to Reconstruct Late Neolithic Shifting Cultivation
    International Forest Fire News (IFFN) No. 30 (January – June 2004, 70-74) Slash-and-Burn Experiments to Reconstruct Late Neolithic Shifting Cultivation Introduction The origin of agriculture in the Near East was in a region where the wild ancestors of the cultivated plants grew in a more or less open landscape. The spread of agriculture to the northwest into Europe covered forested landscapes and therefore required clearing to practise agriculture. According to older opinions, Neolithic agriculture was rather simple and hadn’t developed sophisticated methods of manuring and tillage. Therefore people had to shift their fields regularly to avoid bad harvests (Childe 1929, 1952, 1960, Sangmeister 1950). But on the authority of later research the fertile soils of the loess belt in Central Europe, colonized during the Early Neolithic of Central Europe (about 5600 to 4300 B.C. cal.), allowed adequate yields for many years without manuring. Adequate yields in this case mean between five and eight dt/ha, as calculated for the Early Modern age three-field-system. Based on those yields are also quantitative models of Neolithic agriculture and nutrition (Jacomet and Schibler, 1985). For these reasons permanent fields and settlements were postulated (Modderman 1971, Lüning 1980 a, b). Neolithic agriculture was different from recent shifting cultivation in the tropics and also different from early modern age slash-and-burn agriculture on poor soils in mountains. In the late Neolithic, between 4300 and 2300 B.C., people colonized fresh landscapes outside the loess belt, in the low-mountain region and in the former glaciated regions of the pre-alpine lowlands and those of northern Central Europe and southern Scandinavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaingin in the Philippines: Is It the End of the Forest?
    RURAL DEVELOPMENT FORESTRY NETWORK FROM THE FIELD Kaingin in the Philippines: is it the end of the forest? Anna Lawrence A Synthesis of Results of the FTPP Farmer-initiated Research and Extension Practices Initiative in East Africa Christoffel den Biggelaar Slash-and-Burn in the History of the Swedish Forests Henning Hamilton Forest Genetic Resources in Central America: The Challenge of Conservation Adrian J. Barrance Network Paper 21f Summer 1997 Contents Page Kaingin in the Philippines: is it the end of the forest? Anna Lawrence 1 A Synthesis of Results of the FTPP Farmer-initiated Research and Extension Practices Initiative in East Africa Christoffel den Biggelaar 9 Slash-and-Burn in the History of the Swedish Forests Henning Hamilton 19 Forest Genetic Resources in Central America: The Challenge of Conservation Adrian J. Barrance 25 The authors may be contacted at the following addresses: Anna Lawrence, AERDD, The University of Reading, PO Box 238, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AL, UK. Christoffel den Biggelaar, 100 North Street, Apt 322, Columbus OH 43202, USA. Henning Hamilton, Skogens Hus, Falkvägen 22, 183 50 Täby, Sweden. Adrian Barrance, ESA Consultores, Apartado Postal 4227, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, CA. ISSN 0968-2627 (formerly Social Forestry Network ISSN 0951-1857) Kaingin in the Philippines: is it the end of the forest? Anna Lawrence Introduction Kummer (1992) writes that a lack of data and confusion over terms has given the impression that shifting cultivation, often known as kaingin (in tagalog), is the predominant form of agriculture in the Philippines, and that it is responsible for deforestation. His view is that both of these assertions are overstatements, and detailed work by Olofson (1980) shows that the word kaingin has a range of meanings which reveal the diversity of hillside farming systems in the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Cultivation and Deforestation in Indonesia: Steps Toward Overcoming Confusion in the Debate
    RURAL DEVELOPMENT FORESTRY NETWORK Shifting Cultivation and Deforestation in Indonesia: Steps Toward Overcoming Confusion in the Debate William D. Sunderlin Network Paper 21b Summer 1997 The author wishes to thank Carol Pierce Colfer for insightful comments and Kate Schreckenberg and David Brown for helpful editorial suggestions on a draft of this article. The author is responsible for any errors of fact or interpretation that remain in the text. William D. Sunderlin may be contacted at: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research) P.O. Box 6596, JKPWB Jakarta 10065, Indonesia Tel: +62 251 622 622; Fax: +62 251 622 100 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 0968-2627 (formerly Social Forestry Network ISSN 0951-1857) Shifting Cultivation and Deforestation in Indonesia: Steps Toward Overcoming Confusion in the Debate1 William D. Sunderlin Summary The role of shifting cultivation in deforestation in Indonesia has been an area of great debate. Some claim this farming system is the main cause of forest cover loss. Others claim that – far from being damaging – it is a key means for the conservation and sustainable management of remaining forests. The two sides of the debate are talking past each other, because each refers to different farming systems at opposite ends of what might be called the ‘forest farming continuum’. Recently, there has been progress in clarifying the meaning of certain terms but the debate remains confused. In order to better understand the causes and extent of forest cover change in Indonesia, it is necessary to clearly identify the different forms of agency affecting forests and also to define key terms and concepts such as ‘forest’, ‘deforestation’, ‘degradation’, and ‘causation’.
    [Show full text]
  • Social-Sciences in Forestry. a Current Selected Bibligraphy, No. 61. Blacksburg. Div. of Forestry and Wildlife Reference Materia
    'DOCUMENT RESUME ED 230 412 SE 041 612 AUTHOR Schwab, Judith L., Ed. TITLE Social-Sciences in Forestry. A Current Selected Bibligraphy, No. 61. INSTITUTION Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. Div. of Forestry and Wildlife Resources. SPONS AGENCY Forest Service (DOA), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jun 83 NOTE 64p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Bibliographies (131) -- Collected Works - Serials (022) JOUUNAL CIT Social Sciences in Forestry; n61 Jun 1983 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Business; Conservation (Environment); Economics; *Forestry; *Lumber Industry; *Natural Resources; *Publications; Resource Materials; *Social Science Research; *Social Sciences ABSTRACT Provided in thisdocument is a bibliography of selected materials addressing tiiesinterface between forestry and the social sciences. Materials include articles appearing in United States and foreign professional journals, bibliographies, conference proceedings, and other types of publicntions. A subject-matter classification scheme, in outline format, is provided at the beginning of the document. Entries (numbered 3355-3564) are liited alphabetically by author according to the topics indicated in this , scheme. Major topic areas include social science-applied to: (1) forestry at large; (2) forestry's productive agents; (3) forest production; (4) manufacturing; and (5) to marketing, trade, and demancLfor forest output. Each entry includes citation number, author(s), title, source, year, number of pages, and a code related to specific sections in the subject-matter classification scheme. In °addition, if the publication is not in English, the language used is indicated. Brief annotations are provided for most entries. An author index and subject index are also pr6vided. It is recommended that the subject index be used in conjunction with the subject-laatter classification scheme to locate specific citations.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Fires: a Country-By- IUCN Country Analysis of Forest and Land the World Conservation Union Fires in the ASEAN Nations
    Framing Fires: A country-by- IUCN country analysis of forest and land The World Conservation Union fires in the ASEAN nations Prepared by European Union Dr. David Ganz Project FireFight South East Asia P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB Jakarta, Indonesia Tel: +62 251 622 622 Fax: +62 251 622 100 www.pffsea.org IUCN The World Conservation Union IUCN - World Headquaters Rue Mauverney 28 CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 999 0001 Fax: +41 22 999 0002 ASEAN nations in the and land fires A country-by-country analysis of forest Framing Fires: www.iucn.org WWF International Avenue du Mont-Blanc CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 364 9019 Fax: +41 22 364 064 www.panda.org/forests4life Panda Symbol © 1986 WWF ® WWF Registered Trademark Framing Fires: A country-by- country analysis of forest and land fires in the ASEAN nations Prepared by Dr. David Ganz Cover photos: Background picture: Eucalyptus plantation in Congo by Dr. Takeshi Toma, CIFOR Four small cover pictures from left to right: Efforts to extinguish fires East Kalimantan in 1998; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Indonesia Forest fires in Kinabatangan, Sabah in 1998; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Malaysia Haze from 1998 fires in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; © WWF-Cannon/WWF Malaysia Forest fire in Costa Rica by Stephen Homer, ACDI-CIDA Large cover picture: Kahayan River Under Smoke (d) © WWF/ Alain Compost Project FireFight South East Asia is a Global Initiative of IUCN – The World Conservation Union and WWF – The World Wide Fund for Nature funded by the European Union and supported by the US Forest Service This publication was prepared by staff and consultants of Project FireFight South East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Cultivation in Laos: Transitions in Policy and Perspective
    Shifting Cultivation in Laos: Transitions in Policy and Perspective This report has been commissioned by the Secretariat of the Sector Working Group For Agriculture and Rural Development (SWG-ARD) and was written by Miles Kenney-Lazar Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, USA [email protected] The views contained in this report are those of the researcher and may not necessary reflect those of the Government of Lao PDR 1 Abbreviations and acronyms ACF Action Contre la Faim CCAFS Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research CPI Committee for Planning and Investment DAEC Department of Agricultural Extension and Cooperatives DCCDM Department of Climate Change and Disaster Management DAFO District Agriculture and Forestry Office DLUP Department of Land Use Planning EC European Commission FS 2020 Forest Strategy to the Year 2020 GOL Government of Laos ha hectares IIED International Institute for Environment and Development Lao PDR Lao People‘s Democratic Republic LFAP Land and Forest Allocation Program LPRP Lao People‘s Revolutionary Party MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MONRE Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment MPI Ministry of Planning and Investment NAFRI National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute NA National Assembly NEM New Economic Mechanism NLMA National Land Management Authority NGPES National Growth and Poverty Eradication Strategy NNT NPA Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area NPEP National Poverty Eradication Program NTFPs
    [Show full text]
  • Teak Production by Shifting Cultivators in Northern Lao P.D.R
    Page 1 of 12 Technical Report No. 9, TR 9 Teak production by shifting cultivators in Northern Lao P.D.R. By Peter Kurt Hansen 1, Houmchitsavath Sodarak 2 and Sianouvong Savathvong Shifting Cultivation Research Sub-programme Lao Swedish Forestry Programme Luang Prabang, Lao P.D.R. July 1997 Key words : Shifting cultivation, Taungya, improved fallows, teak (Tectona grandis), Laos, ABSTRACT Shifting cultivation is the most important farming system in Northern Laos, but population pressure and government regulations are increasingly undermining its productivity and sustainability. Identifying and promoting alternative production systems is a high priority of the Lao Government. However, farmers' adoption of new technologies is often hampered by the predominantly mountainous topography, the undeveloped infrastructure, the limited market demand, the relative poverty of the population, and by other factors. Teak (Tectona grandis ) planting by shifting cultivators is one of the more promising possibilities, and has expanded rapidly since about 1988. Despite the high income potentials and ready adoption by farmers, the benefits of teak planting are limited by the inferior genetic material currently planted, by the inadequate management of farmers' teak plantations, by the competition with agriculture for arable land, and by the inability of farmers to hold on to plantations for 20-30 years. There are also concerns that plantations may be prone to serious pest attacks, excessive erosion, and soil depletion. Teak planting may provide an alternative or supplement to shifting cultivation, but is not likely to have a role in improved fallow systems. 1. INTRODUCTION Shifting cultivation is the dominant cropping system in the uplands and mountains of Lao P.D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition
    Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food Security & Historic Disturbance Regimes Swidden farming, also know as shifting cultivation or milpa in Latin America, is conventionally defined as “an agricultural system in which temporary clearings are cropped for fewer years than they are allowed to remain fallow” (Sanchez, 1976). While certainly correct, this definition reflects a Western or modern emphasis on the relatively short period when annual food and other crops are grown. Swidden can also be thought of as forest farming, since the fallow period is typically long, managed and often cultivated as well, although with perennial species rather than annuals. Irrespective of the emphasis, swidden is a rotational form of agriculture that applies natural vegetative processes as a means of replenishing soil fertility and controlling invasive weeds. The practice evolved independently throughout the world and varies in response to site-specific ecological, socio-economic and cultural conditions. Swidden systems have proven to be productive and sustainable adaptations to challenging environmental conditions that feature high labor productivity at low population densities (Cairns, 2007). Swidden agriculture, often pejoratively called slash and burn, has had a poor reputation and been actively suppressed from colonial to contemporary times. In this powerpoint, I consider swidden practices utilizing the framework developed by the classic swidden researcher, Dr. Hal Conklin (1957). He differentiated two shifting cultivation systems: 1) integral, which he described as productive, sustainable, carefully regulated and managed through social norms, cultural traditions and religious practices and that incorporated rich traditional ecological knowledge and practice and 2) incipient , which are more intensive, destructive and unsustainable practices often used by recent migrants who lack site-specific TEKP and have little management capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Mapping Shifting Cultivation Using the Case Study of West Garo Hills, India
    land Article Farms or Forests? Understanding and Mapping Shifting Cultivation Using the Case Study of West Garo Hills, India Amit John Kurien 1,2,* , Sharachchandra Lele 1 and Harini Nagendra 3 1 Centre for Environment and Development, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Jakkur P. O., Bengaluru, Karnataka 560064, India 2 Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India 3 School of Development, Azim Premji University, PES Institute of Technology Campus, Pixel Park, B Block, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560100, India * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-80-23635555 Received: 27 June 2019; Accepted: 27 August 2019; Published: 29 August 2019 Abstract: Attempts to study shifting cultivation landscapes are fundamentally impeded by the difficulty in mapping and distinguishing shifting cultivation, settled farms and forests. There are foundational challenges in defining shifting cultivation and its constituent land-covers and land-uses, conceptualizing a suitable mapping framework, and identifying consequent methodological specifications. Our objective is to present a rigorous methodological framework and mapping protocol, couple it with extensive fieldwork and use them to undertake a two-season Landsat image analysis to map the forest-agriculture frontier of West Garo Hills district, Meghalaya, in Northeast India. We achieve an overall accuracy of ~80% and find that shifting cultivation is the most extensive land-use, followed by tree plantations
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Shifting Cultivation on Some Soil Properties Of
    , m W liNivswnv f* wawa li e ;.. • EFFECT OF SHIFTING CULTIVATION ON SOME SOIL PROPERTIES OF THE BISMARCK MOUNTAINS, TERRITORY OF PAPUA AND NEW GUINEA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY AUGUST 1969 By Harley I. Manner Thesis Committee: John M. Street, Chairman G. Donald Sherman William C. Clarke We certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography. THESIS COMMITTEE _ ^ 2 __ irman ¿¿fctlVtRSlTY O f ;*mWA» J.IBRARY PREFACE In 1967, as a research assistant to Dr. John M. Street, I spent nine months among the Maring-speaking people of Kompiai, Bismarck Mountains, Territory of Papua and New Guinea. Prof. Street and I were interested in the distribution and ecology of various grassland associations, the succession of vegetation from forest to grassland, and the effects of shifting cultivation and burning on soils and vegetation. This paper is a preliminary report based on field research sponsored by the National Science Foundation (Grant GS 1464), titled, "The Influence of Savanna Vegetation on the Soil of Humid Montane New Guinea", J. M. Street the principal investigator. I wish to thank the following members of the University of Hawaii faculty and staff for their assistance: Mr. Roger Watanabe of the Department of Agronomy and Soils; and Prof. A. Abbott of the Geology Department for identifications of rock specimens.
    [Show full text]